For each experiment, the grinding temperature, surface roughness, minimum and maximum residual stresses are shown in Table 2.
Table 2 Orthogonal experiment schedule and results
NO.
|
Grinding
wheel speed
vs (m/s)
|
Workpiece
speed
vw (r/min)
|
Grinding
depth
ap (μm)
|
Grinding
temperature
(℃)
|
Surface
roughness
Ra (μm)
|
Min-Residual
Stress
(MPa)
|
Max-Residual
Stress
(MPa)
|
1
|
60
|
30
|
10
|
361. 2
|
1.81
|
69
|
189
|
2
|
60
|
50
|
30
|
764. 6
|
2.30
|
81
|
230
|
3
|
60
|
70
|
20
|
570. 3
|
2.41
|
61
|
145
|
4
|
60
|
90
|
40
|
760. 8
|
3.14
|
79
|
197
|
5
|
80
|
30
|
20
|
620. 5
|
2.31
|
83
|
185
|
6
|
80
|
50
|
40
|
860. 4
|
2.15
|
90
|
248
|
7
|
80
|
70
|
30
|
654. 9
|
2.51
|
82
|
258
|
8
|
80
|
90
|
10
|
366. 5
|
2.57
|
55
|
151
|
9
|
100
|
30
|
30
|
770. 9
|
2.24
|
94
|
208
|
10
|
100
|
50
|
10
|
367. 1
|
2.45
|
77
|
204
|
11
|
100
|
70
|
40
|
827. 3
|
2.27
|
98
|
284
|
12
|
100
|
90
|
20
|
600. 2
|
2.52
|
85
|
253
|
13
|
120
|
30
|
40
|
910. 7
|
2.54
|
117
|
374
|
14
|
120
|
50
|
20
|
560. 4
|
2.27
|
96
|
301
|
15
|
120
|
70
|
10
|
447. 3
|
2.23
|
72
|
176
|
16
|
120
|
90
|
30
|
757. 4
|
1.71
|
87
|
235
|
3. 1 Effect of grinding wheel speed
The effect of grinding wheel speed on the grinding result is shown in Fig.5. The grinding temperature increased with the increase of grinding wheel speed. As the grinding wheel speed increased, the number of effective abrasive grains per unit time that involved in the grinding increased, the friction and cutting effect between abrasive grains and workpiece increased, and the heat generated by the friction and thermoplastic deformation of workpiece increased. Although much heat was taken away by the generated chips, the speed of heat propagation in the workpiece surface was large than the grinding speed, and a large amount of grinding heat entered into the workpiece, making the grinding temperature rise.
As shown in Fig. 5, the surface roughness decreased with the increasing grinding wheel speed. Firstly, as the grinding wheel speed increased, the maximum undeformed chip thickness and grinding force decreased, resulting in a decrease in the surface roughness. Secondly, as the grinding wheel speed increased, the number of effective abrasive grains per unit time that involved in grinding increased; then the degree of interference between scratches increased, and the workpiece surface became smoother, resulting in a smaller surface roughness.
For dry grinding, the tensile stress caused by the grinding heat was greater than the compressive stress caused by the mechanical extrusion. As shown in Fig. 5, both the minimum and maximum residual stresses were tensile stresses, and they increased with the increase of grinding wheel speed, while the growth rate of maximum residual stress was slightly higher than that of the minimum residual stress. During the high-speed grinding, the residual tensile stress was mainly affected by the grinding thermal action. The higher the grinding temperature, the greater the residual tensile stress produced.
3. 2 Effect of workpiece speed
The effect of workpiece speed on the grinding result is shown in Fig. 6. The grinding temperature decreased with the increase of workpiece speed, and the decreasing rate became more and more gentle. As the workpiece speed increased, the grinding contact time in a unit contact region decreased, and the number of effective abrasive grains that involved in the grinding decreased, then the grinding heat decreased and the grinding temperature gradually decreased.
As shown in Fig. 6, the surface roughness increased with the increase of workpiece speed. Firstly, as the workpiece speed increased, the maximum undeformed chip thickness and grinding force increased, resulting in an increase in the surface roughness. Secondly, as the workpiece speed increased, the grinding contact time in a unit contact region decreased, resulting in a larger surface roughness.
As shown in Fig. 6, the minimum and maximum residual stresses decreased with the increase of workpiece speed. The decreasing rate of maximum residual tensile stress was greater than that of the minimum residual tensile stress. As the workpiece speed increased, the grinding contact time in a unit contact region decreased, and the compressive stress caused by the mechanical extrusion increased, the tensile stress caused by the grinding heat decreased. As the workpiece speed increased from 70 r/min to 90 r/min, the decreasing rate of grinding temperature became small, the influence of grinding thermal stress decreased, and the mechanical extrusion stress increased, then the maximum residual tensile stress decreased rapidly.
3. 3 Effect of grinding depth
The influence of grinding depth on the grinding result was shown in Fig. 7. The grinding temperature increased with the increase of grinding depth, and the increase rate was gradually gentle. As the grinding depth increased, the contact arc length between the grinding wheel and workpiece increased, and the number of effective abrasive grains that involved in grinding increased, then the energy transferred to the workpiece increased, resulting in an increase in the grinding temperature. With the increase of grinding depth, the chip volume and heat taken away by the chips increased, but the heat taken away by the chips could not exceed the melting energy, resulting in a slow increase rate in the grinding temperature.
As shown in Fig. 7, the surface roughness increased with the increase of grinding depth. As the grinding depth increased, the material removal rate and grinding force increased, and the maximum undeformed chip thickness increased, resulting in an increase in the surface roughness.
As shown in Fig. 7, both the minimum and maximum residual stresses increased with the increase of grinding depth. When the grinding depth exceeded 30 μm, the grinding temperature exceeded the Ac1 temperature of 45 steel, and the martensite of body-centered cubic lattice transformed into the austenite of face-centered cubic lattice, which reduced the volume of workpiece material. For the bound deformation of internal material, additional residual tensile stress due to the phase transformation eventually generated on the surface. Therefore, the increase rate of residual tensile stress increased, when the increase rate of grinding temperature decreased. Grinding burns would be generated when the grinding temperature was higher than the Ac1 of workpiece material, which should be avoided.
3.4 Topography
The typical ground surface topographies are shown in Fig. 8, which are corresponding to the experiments of no. 3, no. 4, no. 8, no. 16 respectively. For the experiment of no. 3, the maximum residual stress was the lowest, which was 145 MPa. For the experiment of no. 4, the surface scratches were obvious and mixed, while the surface roughness was the highest, and the ground surface topography was the worst for the maximum workpiece speed and grinding depth. For the experiment of no. 13, the grinding temperature was the highest, and the ground surface topography was better for the maximum grinding wheel speed. For the experiment of no. 16, the surface roughness was the lowest, and the ground surface was even and delicate, without obvious machining defects and burn marks.
3.5 Comprehensive discussion
By the variance analysis for each grinding characteristic in Table 2, Fig. 9 obtained. The grinding depth was the most influential factor for the grinding temperature and residual stress, followed by the grinding wheel speed and workpiece speed. The grinding depth was also the most influential factor for the surface roughness, but followed by the workpiece speed and grinding wheel speed. Combined with Fig. 5, Fig. 6 and Fig. 7, it was found that the effects of grinding wheel speed and grinding depth on the residual stress were positively correlated, but the effect of workpiece speed on the residual stress was negatively correlated.