Determinant of under nutrition among under five children in Ambo town during covid 19 pandemic. A community-based cross-sectional study

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1570098/v1

Abstract

Background: About 8 to 44% of all child mortality in Africa is associated with undernutrition. To alleviate this problem, it is necessary to determine the magnitude and determinants of undernutrition. However, there is scarce evidence in an urban setting like Ambo town. Therefore, this study assessed the magnitude and factors associated with undernutrition under five children in Ambo town, west Ethiopia.

Methods and patients: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Ambo town from March 01 - 30, 2020. A systematic sampling technique was employed to select 363 study participants. Nutritional status indices were generated using ENASMART software.  After testing for collinearity, variables with a p-value < 0.25 in binary logistic regression were interred to backward multiple logistic regressions at a level of significance of p < 0.05.

Results: This study found 16.00%, 25.30%, and 19.00% of the study participants were underweight, wasted, and stunted respectively. Decisions making on major food purchases, who usually care for the child, the age at which the child starts complimentary food, late introduction of complementary food were positively associated with wasting. Diarrhea, birth weight, child age, age at which the child starts complimentary food,  consumption of milk and milk product, and who usually care for the child were significantly associated with underweight. Consumption of milk and milk products, household food security level, and birth weight were independent determinants of stunting.

Conclusion: This study identified high prevalence of undernutrition, especially wasting.

Child birth weight, age, diarrhea, feeing practice, house hold (HH) food security, Decision making on major food purchase, late introduction of complimentary food were found to be the potential determinants of undernutrition. Thus there should be an effort to improve the nutritional status of children in the study area by focusing on these factors.

Background

In 2019, the prevalence of malnutrition among children under five years is unacceptably at a high level. About 144.0 million are stunted, 47 million are wasted and 38.3 million are overweight. About 40% of stunted and 27% of wasted children live in Africa. Being underweight is an alarming issue for low income countries and can be ten times higher than in wealthier countries (1). In Ethiopia, the results of the 2019 mini EDHS (Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey) show that 37% of children under 5 children are stunted, 7% are wasted, and 21% are underweight (2).

Undernutrition among under five years, old children have both short-term and long-term impacts. It had social, economic, and health-related impacts (35). In Africa, 8 to 44% of all child mortality is associated with undernutrition, between 1 to 18% of all school repetitions are associated with stunting, stunted children achieve 0.2 to 3.6 years less in school education, child mortality associated with undernutrition has reduced national workforces by 1 to 13.7%, and 40 to 67% of the working-age population suffered from stunting as children(6). In Ethiopia, an estimated 55.5 billion ETB (Ethiopian Birr) was lost in the year 2009 as a result of a child undernutrition. This is equivalent to 16.5% of GDP. This cost is related to the cost expend because of additional clinical episodes associated with undernutrition in children under five, increased child mortality, grade repetition rate, school dropout, work hours lost, and 67 percent of adults in Ethiopia suffered from stunting as children(7).

Efforts to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 are disrupting food systems, upending health and nutrition services, devastating livelihoods, and threatening food security. UNICEF country offices reported a 30% decline in the overall coverage of services to improve nutrition outcomes for women and children in the early months of the pandemic(8). Even without the added impact of the Covid 19, the world is not on track to meet Sustainable Development Goal 2 to end hunger and all forms of malnutrition(1). In July 2020, the warning of the pandemic worsened the pre-existing crisis of malnutrition and tips an additional 6.7 million children over the edge to become wasted during its first year (9).

The economic impact of Covid 19 in a developing countries is not the same as those of developed countries, because many adults in developing countries are self-employed and work in an informal sector with limited savings and access to safety nets(10). Measures to control the spread of the virus highly affect the urban residents, because their lively hoods are more likely to be in sectors that are more adversely affected by social distancing policies and travel ban including international flight 14-day mandatory quarantine in Ethiopia(11). This can compromise diet quality, quantity, and diversity which increases the risk of undernutrition, especially among vulnerable groups in urban residents (8). Currently, there is scarce literature on the nutritional status of under-five children during covid 19 in urban residences. Hence this study aimed to determine nutritional status and its determinant among under-five children in Ambo town.

Apart from covid 19, the majority of previous studies conducted in Ethiopia focus on rural residents. Very few community-based studies were conducted on urban residents (12, 13). These studies were conducted in the region where there is a high prevalence of undernutrition. The region is quite different from the region where the current study was conducted in terms of socio-economic status and culture including child feeding practice. In addition to this these studies emphasized household characteristics, maternal and child characteristics, and economic variables. Furthermore, these studies overlooked more important variables like childbirth weight, maternal nutritional status, dietary diversity, and household food security. Thus, this study bridge the above-mentioned knowledge gap by assessing nutritional status and its determinant among under-five children in Ambo town.

The results of this study will be used as baseline information for the researcher and for policymakers to make decisions and use available evidence-based interventions to improve the nutritional status of under-five children in the urban residence and in the context of covid 19.

Patients And Methods

Study Area, Design, and Period

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March 01- 30, 2020, in Ambo town using a systematic sampling technique among children aged 6 to 59 months. Ambo town is the capital city of the West Shoa zone of Oromia regional state that was found 144 km to the west of Addis Ababa. The town has a total population of 96,521off which 4869 are children of under-five years old(14). There are 02 public hospitals, 02 health centers, 32 private clinics, and 10 pharmacies. The lively hood of the resident of the town was majorly relaid on the market and informal sectors. The town has six kebeles of which three kebeles (Hora Ayetu, Sankale Farisi, and Yaí Gada) were included in the study. 

Source populationAll children aged 6-59 months who were living in Ambo town were the source population. 

Study populationAll 6-59 months children residing in Ambo town were selected by systematic random sampling method. 

Exclusion criteria

All children with the following parameters were excluded from the study.

Study Variables, Sample Size, and Sampling Technique

Dependent variable: nutritional status measured as wasting, stunting, and underweight

Independent variables: Seven categories of determinant factors were assessed as independent variables;

Socio-economic and demographic variables: Head of HHs, marital status, ethnicity, religion, family size, income, education, occupation, ownership of livestock and farmland, crop production, and home garden

Child characteristics; Age, Sex, birth order, place of delivery, gestational age, types of birth, birth weight, and morbidity status 

Child caring practices; breastfeeding status, dietary diversity score (DDS), hygiene, health care seeking, and immunization

Maternal characteristics; Age, number of children ever born, anti-natal care (ANC) visits, and autonomy in decision-making on major food purchases.

Environmental  health conditions; safe water supply, sanitation, and housing condition.

The minimum sample size (n) required for this study is calculated using single population formula as follows,

        image

 Where:

Zα/2=  is the standard normal score at  confidence interval (CI) 95%=1.96 

p= proportion of stunting in Haramaya district 36.07% (15)                                                                                                                                                            

d= is the margin of sampling error tolerated 5% =0.05.

n=354 

Since, the estimated population size is less than 10,000  (i,e there were only about 4869 children who are living  in Ambo Town kebeles), using the following correction formula:      

 image                                           

Where N= number of overall population. Size (4869)  

nf final sample size

nf = 354 / (1+354/4869) =330 and considering 10% non response rate, a total of 363 children were included in this study. 

Three kebeles were selected by lottery method and the final sample was proportionally allocated to the size of the participant in each selected kebeles. Finally, systematic sampling technique without a sampling frame was used to select the study participant. The data collector makes the Kebeles office the center of the kebeles and goes to the four directions of the kebeles. They contact any household and count the first house that they got children of 6 – 59 months as one. They continue the same procedure until they reach the k value for each kebeles. The first household with children of 6 – 59 months to be included in the study was selected by the lottery method from the first household to k for each kebeles. Then they interview the study participant in the household in every kth value for each kebeles. K values vary for each kebeles. If there are two or more children of 6 – 59 months in the same household, one of them was selected by lottery method.

Data Collection Tool, Process, and Quality Management

A structured pretested questionnaire was used to collect the required data through face-to-face interview and anthropometric measurement was made with children and their mothers. The tool was adopted from similar studies conducted in a different part of Ethiopia including the Ethiopian demographic and health survey (EDHS) (16-18) and some possible modification was made to the tool after to pretest to fit the local context. The questionnaire was translated to Afan Oromo by one of the senior lecturer at Ambo University who is a fluent speaker of English and Afan Oromo for the field purpose and back-translated to English by another lecturer to check for consistency. 

All anthropometric data were collected according to Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance( FANTA)  anthropometric guide 2018 (19). 

Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated portable electronic digital scale (Seca). For children younger than 2 years old, the “tared weight” procedure was used. Children older than two years/able to stand on a weight scale and mothers were measured with minimal close and without shoes. Weighing scales were calibrated with one liter water regularly, because it’s weight is known. The ace of scale indicator was checked against a zero reading for each measurment. Height/length was measured using a standardized measuring board to the nearest 0.1 cm. All anthropometric measurements were made two times and the average values were used for analysis. The child’s minimum dietary diversity score (MDDS) was measured using 24-hour dietary recall method.

Four public health graduating students were recruited and trained for four days on the tool, sampling technique, and obtaining informed verbal consent. The data collection was supervised by two field supervisors. The field supervisor and principal investigator checked the completeness, inconsistency, and inconvenience of data on the field and during summation.  

Statistical analysis

Anthropometric data were converted to nutritional status indices using ENASMART software and imported to Package for Social Science SPSS version 21 for analysis.   Before data analysis using SPSS version 21, all other data were cleaned, coded, and entered into the Epi data 3.1 version. Continuous variables were presented using mean with standard deviation. Frequencies and percentage were used to present categorical variable.  After excluding variable with collinearity coefficients of > 0.8, variables with a p-value of < 0.25 on binary logistic regression were entered into backward multivariate logistic regression analysis with statistical significance at p-value < 0.05 to search for an independent determinants of all the indices of undernutrition. 

The household food insecurity level was measured with the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), a structured, standardized, and validated tool globally(20). 

Operational definition

Under five children: in this study under five children mean those children of 6 – 59 months.

Under nutrition: undernutrition was used to indicate wasting, underweight and stunting. 

Access to improved drinking water: those who had access to tap water, drink boiled water, or treated water with wuha agar were categorized as having access to an improved water supply.

Appropriate breastfeeding: those who practice early initiation, exclusive breastfeeding for six months, Giving colostrum, feed breast milk at least eight times per day, and continue breastfeeding for two years for children older than two years and currently breastfeeding for children < 2 years (21).

Dietary diversity score: those who fed at least 4 food groups among 7 food groups over the last 24 hours before the interview were recorded as achieving good DDS and those who fed < 4 food groups were recorded as having poor DDS(21). 

Underweight: Refers to weight for age z score below the -2 SD from the NCHS/WHO reference of the median of the standard curve(19).

Wasting: Nutritional deficient state of recent of weight fo height/length  below-2SD from the NCHS/WHO  median   value (19).

Stunting: A child was defined as stunted if the height for age index was found to be below -2 SD of the median of the standard curve (19). 

Food secure:→ with raw scores= 0-3  to    the  questions  about   food insecurity-related experiences

Moderate Food insecure:→ with raw scores= 4-6 questions about food insecurity-related experiences.

Severe food insecurity: with raw scores of 7-8 about food insecurity-related experiences(22).

Fully immunized: A child receiving all immunization recommended for his/her age according to recommended immunization for children in Ethiopia (23). 

Partially immunized: A child that misses at least one of his/her immunization recommended for his/her age(23). 

Not immunized: a child never took any immunization at all. 

Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from Ambo University, college of medicine and health science ethical review Committee with the reference number AU/PGC1035/2020 on 20 February 2020. Confidentiality was kept and informed verbal consent was obtained from each study participant after explaining the purpose of the study. Verbal informed consent was approved by the Ambo University college of medicine and health science ethical review Committee. This study was conducted following the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants

A total of 363 participants were included in this study providing a 100% response rate. The mean (+ SD) age of children was 28.85 (+ 14.17) months and about 62.0% were male. Among all, 185 (51.0%) children were in the age category of 24 – 47 months and 259 (71.3%) of them had normal birth weight. Two hundred ninety-four (81.0%) children included in this study were living in male-headed household. About 92.8% of mothers of these children were living with the father of the children and about 49.6% and 41.0% of their father and mother respectively had an educational status of diploma and above. One hundred fifty-six (43.0%) of the household where these children living had severe food insecurity and 246 (67.8%) of both mothers and fathers of these children decide on major food purchases together. Two hundred twenty-five(62%) of the mother of these children were in the age group of 25 – 34 complete years and 98.3% of the household of the study participants had access to an improved water sources (table 1, table 2).  

Illness and health care utilization-related characteristics. 

Three hundred nine (85.1%) of the study participants were fully immunized and 214 (59.0%) got vitamin A supplementation in the last year before the interview. About 57.6% of the study participants experience at least one episode of illness in the last year and about 28.1% experiences diarrhea in the last two weeks. About 22.0% and 12.7% of the study children had fever and cough and fast breathing in the last two weeks respectively (Table 3). 

Caring and feeding practices of the study participant

About 76.9% of the study participants were usually cared for by their mother and 59.0% were breastfed appropriately. Two hundred eighty-four (78.2%) of the study participants started complementary food at six months and about 85.7% of them eat   four or more food groups in the last 24 hours before the interview (table 4). 

Food group consumed by the study participants 

Most (96.4%) of the study participants consumed cereal-based food and few (13.8%) of them consumed meat-based food (figure 1). 

Fig1: food groups consumed by children 

Nutritional status of the study participants

About 16.00%, 25.30%, and 19.00% of the study participants were underweight, wasted, and stunted respectively (figure 2). 

Fig 2 nutritional status of children

Determinants of wasting

Decision-making on major food purchases was an independent determinant of wasting among under-five children. Deciding on a major food purchases by only one member of the family contributes to wasting by two times (AOR= 2.512 at 95% C.I 1.426to 4.423, p-value < 0.0001). Children who were cared for by other people were less likely to waste by 60 %   (AOR= 0.407 at 95 % CI 0.180 to 0.921) relative to children cared for by their mothers. The age at which the child starts complimentary food is the dietary habit that contributes to wasting. Starting complementary food older than seven months contributes to wasting by three times (AOR = 3.506 at CI 1.582 to 7.769) relative to those who start at six months (table 5). 

Determinants of Underweight 

Diarrhea in the last two weak before data collection is the health condition of the child that was significantly associated with being underweight. Diarrhea increases the likely hood of being underweight by three times (AOR= 2.878 at 95% CI 1.206, 5.460, P= 0.014) relative to not having diarrhea. Birth weight is also the child’s nutritional status before birth that was significantly associated with being underweight. Being low birth weight increases the likely hood of being underweight during childhood by 7 times (AOR= 7.081, at 95% CI 2.650, 18.916, P<0.001) compared to being normal birth weight. Child age, being in the age group of 48 – 59 monthsincreases thelikely hood of being underweight by 8 times (AOR= 8.097, at 95% CI 3.090, 21.217, P<0.001)  compared to being in 6 – 23 months. The age at which the child starts complimentary food is a feeding practice that was significantly associated with being underweight. Children who start complimentary food at older than seven months were 6 times underweight (AOR= 6.236 at 95% CI 1.376, 28.269, P= 0.018) compared to those who start at six months. Consumption of milk and milk products is another feeding practice that shows a significant association with being underweight. Children who do not consume milk and milk products were 3 times underweight (AOR= 2.878 at 95% CI 1.427, 5.804, P= 0.003) relative to those who consume milk and milk products 24 hours before data collection. Children who were cared for by other people were less likely underweight by 80% (AOR= 0.197 at 95% CI 0.057, 0.680, P= 0.010) compared to those who were cared for by their mothers (Table 6). 

Determinants of stunting

Consumption of milk and milk products was an independent determinant of stunting among dietary variables. Children who did not consume milk in the last 24 hours before the interview were stunted two times (AOR= 2.029 at CI 1.070, 3.665, P= 0.018) relative to those who does not consume milk and milk products. Household food security, sever food insecurity increases the chance of stunting by two times (AOR= 2.481 at 95% CI 1.198, 5.136, p= 0.014) compared to food secured household. Birth weight is also an independent determinant of stunting. Being low birth weight increases the likely hood of stunting by three times (AOR= 3.185 at 95% CI 1.349, 7.518, P=0.008) relative to normal birth weight (table 7). 

Discussion

This community-based cross-sectional study aimed at identifying the nutritional status and its determinant among under-five children in an urban settings in West Shoa, western Ethiopia. Despite the national nutrition programs aimed to reduce the prevalence of undernutrition by 2020 (24), the current study identified that undernutrition among under-five children was high. About 16.00%, 25.30%, and 19.00% of the study participants were underweight, wasted, and stunted respectively. This study noted decision-making on major food purchase, caring for the child, the age at which the child start complimentary food, diarrheal disease, birth weight, age of the child, consumption of milk and milk product, and household food security were associated with undernutrition among the study participant.

This study found a high prevalence of wasting and underweight as compared to the regional prevalence reported in mini EDHS 2019 (2) and studies conducted in Rwanda(25) and a high prevalence of wasting as compared to previous studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia(12, 26, 27). This high prevalence may be because of the small sample size as compared to the national wide survey. Another possible explanation for this discrepancy is the effect of covid − 19. The current study was conducted in an urban setting, where the impact of covid 19 worsened the food security of the household (28). Thus this may increase in the prevalence because of acute nutritional deprivation as a result of the pandemic, as wasting indicates acute nutritional deprivation. Underweight indicates both chronic and acute nutritional deprivation(19). Another study also shows that covid 19 significantly affects children’s nutrition and worsens undernutrition in developing countries(29). This increase in wasting is an alarming increased risk of death for children. This study found the prevalence of stunting (19%) lower than previous studies conducted in Ethiopia that identified the prevalence of stunting as 21–47.9% (12, 13, 17, 26). This may be because of variation in the study area. Two of the study (12, 13) were conducted in the region where there is a high prevalence of stunting according to the mini EDHS 2019 report(2). Other studies were conducted in rural and pastoralist communities where there is a high prevalence of undernutrition among under-five children(26, 30).

Family decision-making on major food purchases was significantly associated with children’s wasting status. Children whose one of the family members decides on major food purchases were found to be more wasted compared to their counterparts. A study conducted in a rural communities in Ethiopia also found a significant association of power imbalance between the family and children undernutrition(31). This implies that both mother and father had power on major food purchases and they can fulfill the need of their child. A study conducted in Wolaita Sodo identified that a mother’s decision-making had a significant association with child wasting(32).

In line with other studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia, this study found that diarrheal disease in the last two weak before the interview was found to be positively associated with being underweight (13, 16, 26, 33). This may be because, infectious diseases play a major role in undernutrition as they result in increased needs and high energy expenditure, lower appetite, nutrient losses due to vomiting, poor digestion, mal-absorption, and the utilization of nutrients and disruption of metabolic equilibrium(34).

The current study found that the age at which children start complimentary food was also found a contributing factor to wasting and being underweight. Children who start complimentary food at older than seven months were more likely underweight and wasted. This finding is in agreement with the result of the study conducted in Ethiopia that reports a strong association of delay in complimentary food with linear growth falter (35). At six-month infant triple their birth weight, they become active and their digestive system is also ready for food other than breast milk. At this age breast milk alone is no longer enough to meet their dietary need because of the increased demand for their growth and development(36). There is evidence that the late introduction of complementary food increases the risk of undernutrition among under-five children(37).

Consumption of milk and milk products is another child feeding practice that was found to be positively associated with stunting and being underweight. Milk contains high levels of energy, proteins, fat, and another micronutrient like calcium and the insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) that are of major relevance for children’s development and growth(38, 39). A similar result was reported by studies that analyze the demographic and health survey (DHS) data of all low and middle-income countries (40). Another study conducted in Tanzania found a significant association between milk consumption with arm circumference and stunting among female children of five years (41).

This study identified that being low birth weight increases the likely hood of being underweight during childhood by 7 times. This finding was in agreement with the finding of other studies conducted in Ethiopia(42). Low birth weight is the fetal nutritional status that significantly affects the subsequent growth and development of the child and it is because of intrauterine growth restriction or prematurity (43). It ends up in low growth with length, weight, and head, and abdominal circumference that results in stunting and low weight due mainly a lower proportion of visceral and fat tissue (44, 45).

Child age, being in the age group of 48–59 months increases the likely hood of being underweight by 8 times compared to being in 6–23 months. A similar finding was reported by another study in Ethiopia(25). This may be because of insufficient dietary intake apart from their increased demand for their growth and development. Sever food insecurity increases the chance by two compared to food secured household. This finding agrees with the findings of other studies done in Ethiopia(46). This may be because food insecurity affects the dietary intake of the child.

This study accomplished its objective of assessing children’s nutritional status and its determinants in Ambo town. However, there are some limitations. First, it lacks measure information on some important confounding variables such as parasitic infection, HIV status, mother’s pre-pregnancy weight, and the daily caloric intake which could cause problems in interpreting the results. Second, there may be a potential recall bias to collect data on the last 24-hour food consumption, birth weight, child's history of illness, and breastfeeding practice. However, these biases were reduced by using a different technologies like looking at the birth certificate of the child for those who had it to look at birth weight and using a local calendar to help the respondent to memorize the child's history of illness. Other variables related to covid 19 were also not measured because of the lack of tools and shortage of time to draft and validate tools during the pandemic.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study identified that high prevalence of undernutrition especially wasting. Decision making on major food purchase, age at which the child starts complimentary food, diarrhea in the last two weak before data collection, birth weight, child age, consumption of milk and milk product, who usually care for the child, and household food security level were found to be the potential determinants of undernutrition (wasting, underweight and stunting).

There should be an effort on reducing child undernutrition. This could be true by reducing the incidence of diarrheal disease by increasing access to improved water, vaccination and sanitation, and hygiene. All stakeholders working on women’s affairs should work on empowering women in major household decision-making. The health office also advocates appropriate complementary feeding practices and the prevention of low birth weight. Stakeholders working on the economy of the community should work to improve the economic status of the community to ensure food security. Further study is needed to explore why children who were cared for by other people other than their mother were less likely undernourished. Further studies also need to identify the determinant of undernutrition relative covid 19.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval was obtained from Ambo University, college of medicine and health science ethical review Committee with the reference number AU/PGC1035/2020 on 20 February 2020. Informed verbal consent to participate was obtained from each study participant after explaining the purpose of the study. 

Consent for publication: Not applicable

Availability of data and materials: data and other related material will be obtained from corresponding author. 

Competing interests: We the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. 

Funding: No funding was obtained for this study except stationary material was supported by Ambo University College of medicine and health science. 

Authors' contributions: BBB and GTD design and finalize the proposal, supervise data collection, data analysis, interpreted data, manuscript preparation and summation. 

Acknowledgement : The authors would like to acknowledge Ambo University for approving proposal for this research and issuing of ethical clearance. We also extend our thanks to data collector, supervisor and participants for their cooperation. 

References

  1. Organization WH. Levels and trends in child malnutrition: UNICEF/WHO/The World Bank Group joint child malnutrition estimates: key findings of the 2020 edition. Levels and trends in child malnutrition: UNICEF/WHO/The World Bank Group joint child malnutrition estimates: key findings of the 2020 edition2020.
  2. CSA M. Ethiopia mini demographic and health survey. Addis Ababa, July. 2014.
  3. Arcand J-L. Undernourishment and economic growth: the efficiency cost of hunger: Food & Agriculture Org.; 2001.
  4. Wang X, Taniguchi K. Does better nutrition enhance economic growth? The economic cost of hunger. Nutrition intake and economic growth Studies on the cost of hunger. 2003.
  5. Taniguchi K, Wang X. Nutrition intake and economic growth: studies on the cost of hunger: Food & Agriculture Org.; 2003.
  6. Union A. The cost of hunger in Africa: Social and economic impact of child undernutrition in Egypt, Ethiopia, Swaziland and Uganda background paper. Abuja, Nigeria. 2014.
  7. African Union Commission WFP, Africa UNECf. The cost of hunger in Ethiopia: Implications for the growth and transformation of Ethiopia. 2012.
  8. Fore HH, Dongyu Q, Beasley DM, Ghebreyesus TA. Child malnutrition and COVID-19: the time to act is now. The Lancet. 2020;396(10250):517–8.
  9. Programme WF. Global monitoring of school meals during COVID-19 school closures. 2020.
  10. Barnett-Howell Z, Watson OJ, Mobarak AM. The benefits and costs of social distancing in high-and low-income countries. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2021;115(7):807–19.
  11. Bundervoet T, Finn AJ, Nakamura S, Beyene BM, Paci P, Mylenko N, et al. Ethiopia Poverty Assessment-Harnessing Continued Growth for Accelerated Poverty Reduction: Overview. 2020.
  12. Adugnga T, Thiraviam M, Kedir S, Geto T, Hagos T, Yesuf T, et al. Assessment of Nutritional status and Associated factors of children under 5years of age in Dabat Town, North Gondar, Ethiopia. 2017.
  13. Menalu MM, Bayleyegn AD, Tizazu MA, Amare NS. Assessment of prevalence and factors associated with malnutrition among under-five children in Debre Berhan town, Ethiopia. International Journal of General Medicine. 2021;14:1683.
  14. CSA. Population Projections for Ethiopia 2007–2037. CSA Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2013.
  15. Redi F, Egata G, Kedir A. Prevalence of malnutrition among children aged 6–59 in Haramaya district, Oromia, Ethiopia. J Biometrics Biostatistic. 2017;8(4).
  16. Wie GT, Tsegaye D. Determinants of acute malnutrition among children aged 6–59 Months visiting public health facilities in Gambella town, southwest Ethiopia: unmatched case–control study. Nutrition and Dietary Supplements. 2020;12:147–56.
  17. Mengesha DK. Prevalence and Determinants of Under-nutrition Among Children Under Five Years of Age in Afar Region, Ethiopia: Evidence From 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. 2021.
  18. Kassie GW, Workie DL. Determinants of under-nutrition among children under five years of age in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–11.
  19. Cashin K, Oot L. Guide to anthropometry. a practical tool for program planners, managers. and implementers. Technical report, Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition …
  20. Ballard TJ, Kepple AW, Cafiero C. The food insecurity experience scale: development of a global standard for monitoring hunger worldwide. Rome: FAO. 2013;61.
  21. Organization WH. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices part 3: country profiles. 2010.
  22. Wambogo EA, Ghattas H, Leonard KL, Sahyoun NR. Validity of the food insecurity experience scale for use in sub-Saharan Africa and characteristics of food-insecure individuals. Current developments in nutrition. 2018;2(9):nzy062.
  23. Belete H, Kidane T, Bisrat F, Molla M, Mounier-Jack S, Kitaw Y. Routine immunization in Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development. 2015;29.
  24. health Fmo. National Nutrtion Program II 2016–2020. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ministiry of health, 2020.
  25. 1 DMABEGMHHARE. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Under Nutrition among Children Aged 6 to 59 Months in Ngoma District, Rwanda. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH INTERNATIONAL 2021;4(1):10v – 20.
  26. Asfaw M, Wondaferash M, Taha M, Dube L. Prevalence of undernutrition and associated factors among children aged between six to fifty nine months in Bule Hora district, South Ethiopia. BMC Public health. 2015;15(1):1–9.
  27. Gebre A, Reddy PS, Mulugeta A, Sedik Y, Kahssay M. Prevalence of malnutrition and associated factors among under-five children in pastoral communities of Afar Regional State, Northeast Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Journal of nutrition and metabolism. 2019;2019.
  28. Hirvonen K, Abate GT, de Brauw A. Food and nutrition security in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia during COVID-19 pandemic: May 2020 report: Intl Food Policy Res Inst; 2020.
  29. Zemrani B, Gehri M, Masserey E, Knob C, Pellaton R. A hidden side of the COVID-19 pandemic in children: the double burden of undernutrition and overnutrition. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2021;20(1):1–4.
  30. Demissie S, Worku A. Magnitude and factors associated with malnutrition in children 6–59 months of age in pastoral community of Dollo Ado district, Somali region, Ethiopia. Sci J Public Health. 2013;1(4):175–83.
  31. Ersino G, Zello GA, Henry CJ, Regassa N. Gender and household structure factors associated with maternal and child undernutrition in rural communities in Ethiopia. Plos one. 2018;13(10):e0203914.
  32. Workie SB, Mekonen T, Fekadu W, Mekonen TC. Level of Undernutrition and Its Determinants Among Children Aged 12–59 Months in Wolaita District, Ethiopia. Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics. 2020;11:109.
  33. Ahmed AT, Abas AH, Elmi A, Omer A. Determinants of severe acute malnutrition among children aged 6–36 months in Kalafo district (riverine context) of Ethiopia. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):1–9.
  34. Morris SS, Cogill B, Uauy R, Maternal, Group CUS. Effective international action against undernutrition: why has it proven so difficult and what can be done to accelerate progress? The Lancet. 2008;371(9612):608–21.
  35. Hirvonen K, Wolle A, Laillou A, Vinci V, Chitekwe S, Baye K. Understanding delays in the introduction of complementary foods in rural Ethiopia. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2021:e13247.
  36. Organization WH. The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: report of an expert consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: 2001. WHO/NHD/01.09, WHO/FCH/CAH 01.24).[Google Scholar].
  37. Shrimpton R, Victora CG, de Onis M, Lima RC, Blossner M, Clugston G. Worldwide timing of growth faltering: implications for nutritional interventions. Pediatrics. 2001;107(5):e75-e.
  38. Hoppe C, Mølgaard C, Michaelsen KF. Cow's milk and linear growth in industrialized and developing countries. Annu Rev Nutr. 2006;26:131–73.
  39. Wiley AS. Does milk make children grow? Relationships between milk consumption and height in NHANES 1999–2002. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Association. 2005;17(4):425–41.
  40. Herber C, Bogler L, Subramanian S, Vollmer S. Association between milk consumption and child growth for children aged 6–59 months. Scientific reports. 2020;10(1):1–9.
  41. Ånestrand G. Milk consumption and growth of children in the Kilimanjaro region in rural Tanzania.: An ethnographic research done through quantitative and qualitative methodes. 2013.
  42. Tekile AK, Woya AA, Basha GW. Prevalence of malnutrition and associated factors among under-five children in Ethiopia: evidence from the 2016 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey. BMC research notes. 2019;12(1):1–6.
  43. Pojda J, Kelley L. Low Birth weight-Nutrition policy discussion paper No. 18. United Nations Administrative Committee on Coordination. 2000.
  44. Villar J, Belizán J. The relative contribution of prematurity and fetal growth retardation to low birth weight in developing and developed societies. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1982;143(7):793–8.
  45. Bakketeig L. Current growth standards, definitions, diagnosis and classification of fetal growth retardation. European journal of clinical nutrition. 1998;52(1):S1.
  46. Betebo B, Ejajo T, Alemseged F, Massa D. Household food insecurity and its association with nutritional status of children 6–59 months of age in east Badawacho District, south Ethiopia. Journal of environmental and public health. 2017;2017.

Tables

Table 1

socio-demographic characteristics of the study population

Socio-demographic characteristics of child’s family

frequency

percent

Child sex

male

225

62.0

female

138

38.0

Child age (in completed month)

Mean ± SD 28.85 (± 14.17)

6–23

132

36.4

24–47

185

51.0

48–59

46

12.7

Birth weight

2.5–4.2

259

71.3

< 2.5

30

8.3

not weighted

74

20.4

Head of the household

male

294

81.0

female

69

19.0

Current relationship of a mother with father of the child

mom live together

337

92.8

mom lives alone with her child

26

7.2

Father educational status

diploma and above

180

49.6

secondary education

73

20.1

primary education

83

22.9

can't read and write

27

7.4

Mother educational status

diploma and above

149

41.0

secondary education

68

18.7

primary education

108

29.8

can’t read and write

38

10.5

Mother occupation

housewife

135

37.2

employed

197

54.3

daily laborer

31

8.5

Maternal age

Mean ± SD = 28.12 ± 48

15–24

84

23.1

25–34

225

62.0

>= 35

54

14.9

Decision maker on major food purchase

both mother and father

246

67.8

only one part of the family

117

32.2

Table 2

Environmental and house hold characteristics

Environmental and household characteristics

Frequency

Percent

Number of under-five children in household

1

295

81.3

>= 2

68

18.7

> 4

12

3.3

HH food security level

Food Secured

113

31.1

Moderate food insecurity

94

25.9

Sever food insecurity

156

43.0

Goat in household

yes

3

.8

no

360

99.2

Sheep in household

yes

28

7.7

No

335

92.3

Chicken in household

yes

21

5.8

no

342

94.2

Access to improved drinking water

yes

357

98.3

no

6

1.7

Monthly income of the family

>= 4000

174

47.9

< 4000

189

52.1

Table 3

Illness and health care utilization-related characteristics

Health care utilization and health status of the child

Frequency

Percents

Immunization status for age

Fully immunized

309

85.1

partially immunized

47

12.9

not immunized

7

1.9

Vitamin A supplementation in the last year

yes

214

59.0

no

149

41.0

Illness of the child last year

no

154

42.4

yes

209

57.6

Diarrhea in the last two weak

no

261

71.9

yes

102

28.1

fever in the last two weak

no

283

78.0

yes

80

22.0

cough and fast breathing in the last two weak

no

317

87.3

yes

46

12.7

Table 4

Caring and feeding practices of the study participants

Caring and feeding practice

Frequency

Percent

Who usually feeds the child

mother

279

76.9

Others*

84

23.1

ANC visit

yes

347

95.6

no

16

4.4

Appropriate breastfeeding

yes

214

59.0

No

149

41.0

Age at which the child starts complimentary food

start at six month

284

78.2

start at < 6 month

67

18.5

atart at > = 7 month

12

3.3

Dietary diversity score

>= 4 food groups

311

85.7

< 4 food groups

52

14.3

*Home maid, sibling, grandmother, father

Table 5

Determinants of wasting

Variables

Categorical

Wasting status

AOR (95% CI)

COR (95% CI)

P-value

Decision maker on food purchase

Both mother & father

202 (82.1%)

44 (17.9%)

1

1

 

Only one part of family

69 (59.0%)

48 (41.0%)

3.237(1.461, 7.175)

2.512 (1.426, 4.423)

0.001

Fever in the last two weeks

No

200 (70.7%)

83 (29.3%)

1

1

 

Yes

71 (88.8%)

9 (11.2%)

0.414 (0.132, 1.300)

0.463 (0.209, 1.028)

0.058

Who usually cares for the child

Mother

195 (69.9%)

84 (30.1%)

1

1

 

Other people

76 (90.5%)

8 (9.5%)

0.452 (0.168, 1.214)

0.407 (0.180, 0.921)

0.031

ANC visit

Yes

259 (74.6%)

88 (25.4%)

1

1

 

No

12 (75.0%)

4 (25.0%)

0.297 (0.058, 1.515)

0.303 (0.077, 1.191)

0.089

Age at which complementary feeding started

At 6 month

206 (72.5%)

78 (27.5%)

1

1

 

< 6 month

56 (83.6%)

11 (16.4%)

1.458 (0.514, 4.135)

0.904 ( 0.500, 1.633)

0.737

>= 7 month

9 (75.0%)

3 (25.0%)

0.869 (0.187, 7.289)

3.506 (1.582, 7.769)

0.002

Table 6

determinants of underweight

Variables

Categorical

Underweight

COR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

P value

 

Only one part of family

90 (76.9%)

27 (23.1%)

1.062 (0.412, 2.737)

1.873 (0.922, 3.803)

0.083

 

Yes

80 (78.4%)

22 (21.6%)

1.377(0.483, 3.921)

2.566 (1.206, 5.460)

0.014

Who usually cares for the child

Mother

225 (80.6%)

54 (19.4%)

1

1

 

Other people

80 (95.2%)

4 (4.8%)

0.500 (0.211, 1.185)

0.197 (0.057, 0.680)

0.010

no

99 (73.9%)

35 (26.1%)

2.065 (0.938, 4.544)

2.878 (1.427, 5.804)

0.003

Birth weight (g)

2500– 4200

231 (89.2%)

28 (10.8%)

1

1

 

< 2500

19 (63.3%)

11 (36.7%)

13.778 (3.309, 57.367)

7.081 (2.650, 18.916)

< 0.001

not weighted

55 (74.3%)

19 (25.7%)

1.708 (0.563, 5.181)

 

0.175

Child age (in completed month)

6–23

120 (90.9%)

12 (9.1%)

1

1

 

24–47

159 (85.9%)

26(14.1%)

1.898 (0.587, 6.134)

2.098 (0.933, 4.716)

0.073

48–59

26 (56.5%)

20 (43.3%)

26.323 (5.827, 118.899)

8.097 (3.090, 21.217)

< 0.001

Age at which complementary feeding started

At 6 month

236 (83.1%)

48(16.9%)

1

1

 

< 6 month

61 (91.0%)

6 (9.0%)

1.115 (0.182, 6.823)

1.089 (0,377, 3.145)

0.875

>= 7 month

8 (66.7%)

4 (33.3%)

11.363 (1.078, 119.732)

6.236 (1.376, 28.269)

0.018

Table 7

determinants of stunting

Variables

Categorical

Stunting

COR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

P-value

Number of under five children in HH

1

244 (82.7%)

51 (17.3%)

1

1

 

>= 2

50 (73.5%)

18 (26.5%)

2.499 (1.058, 5.905)

1.915 (0.980, 3.742)

0.057

Milk and milk product

Yes

195 (85.2)

34 (14.8)

1

1

 

no

99 (73.9)

35 (26.1)

2.065 (0.938, 4.544)

2.029(1.070, 30529)

0.018

Maternal food security level

food secured

100 (88.5)

13 (11.5)

1

1

 

Moderate food insecurity

75 (79.8)

19 (20.2)

2.142 (0.807, 5.683)

1.811 (0.804, 4.079)

0.152

Sever food insecurity

119 (76.3)

37 (20.2)

3.138 (1.27, 8.738)

2.481 (1.198, 5.136)

0.014

Having sheep

Yes

   

1

1

 

No

   

8.601 (0.850, 87.059)

6.127 (0.794, 47.293)

0.082

Birth weight (g)

2500– 4200

219 (84.6)

40 (15.4)

1

1

 

< 2500

18 (60.0)

12 (40.0)

2.799 (0.996, 7.864)

3.185 (1.349, 7.518)

0.008

not weighted

57 (77.0)

17 (23.0)

1.717 (0.708, 4.165)

1.384 (0.691, 2.773)

0.369