Impact of acute mental stress on ankle blood pressure in young healthy men: a pilot study

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1574443/v1

Abstract

Objective: Acute mental stress (MS) increases arm blood pressure (BP); however, it remains unclear whether the stress-induced pressor response is also seen in other vessels. The present study aimed to examine the impact of acute MS on ankle BP. Fifty-six young, healthy men (age range, 19–24 years) were divided into the MS (n = 29) and control (CON) (n = 27) groups, and each group performed a 5-min MS (mental arithmetic) or CON tasks. Systolic and diastolic BPs (SBP and DBP, respectively) of both the brachial and posterior tibial arteries were simultaneously measured at baseline and 5 and 30 min after the task.

Results: In the MS group, brachial BP measures significantly increased (P < 0.05) until at 30 min after the task; ankle BP measures were also significantly (P < 0.05) elevated during this time. In the CON group, no significant change was found in brachial BP measures and ankle SBP, whereas a significant increase (P < 0.05) in ankle DBP was observed at 30 min after the task. Our findings suggest that not only brachial BP but also ankle BP exhibit a sustained elevation after acute MS, suggesting a systemic pressor response by stress exposure.

Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000047796 Registered on: 20th May 2022.

Introduction

An increase in blood pressure (BP) is known to be a typical human cardiovascular response to acute mental stress (MS). Arm BP increases during acute MS; this pressor response reportedly persists for a long time after the cessation of stress exposure [14], but not in all cases [5, 6]. Acute MS in the laboratory is considered as a proxy of stressful exposures during daily life [7]. Indeed, an exaggerated increase in arm BP during acute MS and a delayed BP recovery after stress exposure are associated with an increased risk of future cardiovascular disease (CVD) [8]. Therefore, assessing BP responses to acute MS has potential clinical implications.

Importantly, the impact of acute MS on BP in other vessels besides arm BP has not yet been investigated. Recently, the importance of assessing lower limb arterial health has been proposed in detecting general CVD risk [9]. Indeed, a chronic increase in ankle systolic BP (SBP) is an independent predictor of CVD [10, 11]. If ankle BP increases with acute MS, similar to arm BP, chronic repetition of episodic ankle pressor responses due to stressful exposures during daily life may contribute to elevating the basal BP levels of the same site. However, the changes in ankle BP associated with acute MS are currently unclear. Therefore, the present pilot study aimed to investigate the impact of acute MS on ankle BP.

METHODS

Participants

A total of 56 young healthy men (age range, 19–24 years) participated in the study. The participants were divided into the MS (n = 29; age, 20.6 ± 0.2 years; height, 169.1 ± 0.9 cm; body weight, 63.8 ± 1.2 kg; body mass index, 22.3 ± 0.4 kg/m2 [means ± SE]) and CON groups (n = 27; age, 20.4 ± 0.2 years; height, 167.6 ± 0.8 cm; body weight, 64.2 ± 1.6 kg; body mass index, 22.8 ± 0.4 kg/m2). None of the participants were smokers or took any medications during the study period. The purpose, experimental procedure, and risks associated with the study were fully explained to all participants, and they provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Okinawa University (#2018-03) and conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Experimental procedures

All experiments were conducted in a quiet, air-conditioned room (24ºC–26ºC). All participants were asked to refrain from performing strenuous exercise, consuming alcohol (≥ 24 h) and caffeine (≥ 12 h), and eating (≥ 3 h) before the experiments.

A schematic representation of the experimental protocol is shown in Fig. 1. All participants were positioned supine throughout the experimental session. After resting in the supine position for at least 15 min, baseline measures of hemodynamic variables were obtained. Subsequently, the MS and CON groups performed either a 5-min MS or a CON task (detailed below); a post-task phase was set to 30 min.

We used mental arithmetic as the MS task according to previous studies [6, 12]. To elaborate, each participant was asked to serially subtract 13 from a 3-digit number (close to 1,000) as quickly and accurately as possible within 5 min. During the task, the participants were intentionally frustrated by being asked to perform the calculation faster and by being corrected immediately if wrong answers were provided. A metronome was played loudly for additional distraction. When the number was < 13 (the answer was not allowed to go below 0), the participants restarted the task using the original 3-digit number. On the other hand, in the CON task, the participants were instructed to slowly count upward, starting from 1, for 5 min, as previously described [6, 13], without any annoying instructions or metronome noises.

Measurements

In addition to the baseline measures, heart rate (HR), SBP, and diastolic BP (BP) of both the brachial and posterior tibial arteries were measured at 5 min and 30 min after the task using a vascular testing system (VaSera VS-1500AN; Fukuda Denshi, Tokyo, Japan). For the measurements, BP cuffs were wrapped on both upper arms and ankles, and electrocardiogram electrodes were placed on both wrists.

To assess the stress responses, we measured the brachial SBP and DBP using an automated sphygmomanometer (Tango +; SunTech Medical Instruments, Morrisville, NC, USA) before and during the MS task. During the task, the measurement was conducted twice (approximately 2 and 4 min after starting the task), and the average value was calculated. HR was also continuously measured using a three-lead electrocardiogram (413; Intercross, Tokyo, Japan). HR data were recorded simultaneously with the BP measurements and averaged. Further, immediately after the task, the participants were asked to rate their perceived stress during the task using a standard five-point scale of 0 (not stressful), 1 (somewhat stressful), 2 (stressful), 3 (very stressful), and 4 (very, very stressful) [14]. On the other hand, these assessments were not conducted in the CON task because no marked changes in hemodynamic variables and perceived stress rating in response to this task have been previously confirmed [6, 13].

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as means ± SE. Hemodynamic variables before and during the MS task were compared using a paired student’s t-test. Two-way (time × group) repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc testing was performed on the post-task changes in hemodynamic variables. The significance was considered at a P-value < 0.05. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 28.0 software (IBM SPSS Japan, Tokyo, Japan).

Results

In the MS group, marked increases in HR and brachial BP in response to the task were observed (Table 1), and the mean perceived stress level was 2.8 ± 0.2 on a five-point scale.

Table 1

The response of hemodynamic variables to the task in the MS group

 

Before

Task

HR (beats/min)

58 ± 1

74 ± 2*

Brachial SBP (mmHg)

112 ± 1

128 ± 2*

Brachial DBP (mmHg)

60 ± 1

77 ± 2*

Data are expressed as means ± SE
MS, mental stress; HR, heart rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure
*P < 0.05 vs. before the MS task

The post-task changes in HR as well as the brachial and ankle BP measurements are illustrated in Table 2. As the main results, brachial SBP and DBP significantly increased until at 30 min after the task in the MS group. Similarly, ankle SBP and DBP were significantly elevated during this time in the same group. In the CON group, no significant change was found in brachial BP measures and ankle SBP across the measurement timepoints, whereas a significant increase in ankle DBP was observed at 30 min after the task.

Table 2

Post-task changes in the heart rate and brachial and ankle blood pressure measures in both groups

 

Group

Baseline

5 min

30 min

ANOVA

HR (beats/min)

CON

57 ± 2

57 ± 1

56 ± 1

Interaction: P = 0.026

 

MS

57 ± 1

59 ± 1*

56 ± 1

 

Brachial SBP (mmHg)

CON

120 ± 2

118 ± 2*

120 ± 2

Interaction: P < 0.001

 

MS

118 ± 1

121 ± 1*

120 ± 1*

 

Brachial DBP (mmHg)

CON

69 ± 1

69 ± 1

70 ± 1

Time: P = 0.010; Trial: P = 0.576

 

MS

68 ± 1

71 ± 1*

71 ± 1*

Interaction: P = 0.077

Ankle SBP (mmHg)

CON

132 ± 2

132 ± 2

132 ± 2

Interaction: P < 0.001

 

MS

130 ± 2

136 ± 2*

137 ± 2*

 

Ankle DBP (mmHg)

CON

68 ± 1

68 ± 1

70 ± 1*

Interaction: P = 0.049

 

MS

67 ± 1

70 ± 1*

72 ± 1*

 
Data are expressed as means ± SE
HR, heart rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; CON, control; MS, mental stress; ANOVA, analysis of variance
*P < 0.05 vs. baseline

Discussion

Our study demonstrates for the first time that not only brachial BP but also ankle BP exhibit a sustained elevation after acute MS.

In this study, the increased brachial BP induced by acute MS persisted for 30 min post-stress, which is congruent with previous reports demonstrating long-lasting arm BP elevations after acute MS [14]. On the other hand, other studies have reported the absence of a sustained pressor response post-stress [5, 6]. The reason for the inconsistency among the studies may be due to the differences in the participant characteristics, task types or durations, or BP measurement method.

In addition to the above brachial pressor response, we found an increase in ankle BP after acute MS, which was sustained for 30 min. Acute MS is known to substantially increases the circulating levels of catecholamines [15, 16], which would affect various tissues via blood circulation. In addition, robust elevation in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) has been observed after acute MS [14, 17], which can be observed in both upper and lower limbs [17], suggesting the presence of a systemic effect. Both norepinephrine infusion and elevated MSNA increase vascular resistance of vessels in the limbs [1820]. Moreover, it has recently been suggested that delayed BP recovery after acute MS occurs, in part, via a neurogenic vascular mechanism mediated by α1-adrenergic receptors [21]. Considered together, we speculate that the observed brachial and ankle pressor response after acute MS is likely to be attributed to the increased sympathetic vasoconstrictor tone at a systemic level. Direct evidence supporting our assertion is not available, and further investigations, therefore, are warranted. On the other hand, we observed an increase in ankle DBP at 30 min after the task in the CON group. Such vascular response seems to be caused by the basal vascular tone to maintain the peripheral blood flow, and the observed increase in ankle DBP in the MS group might also be partially due to the same mechanism.

It has been reported that a marked arm pressor response to acute MS is linked to CVD [8]. In this study, we provide the first evidence demonstrating that acute MS results in a long-lasting elevation in ankle BP. Therefore, repeated exposure to increased ankle BP due to stressful exposures during daily life activities may cause a chronic elevation of ankle BP, which is identified as an independent predictor of CVD [10, 11]. Although this aspect is largely speculative at this time, we consider that the measurement of ankle BP in addition to arm BP can be used as an important assessment of stress response, and this would further expand our understanding of the association between human cardiovascular response to acute MS and CVD.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that acute MS results in a sustained elevation in BP in both upper (i.e., the brachium) and lower (i.e., the ankle) limbs vessels in young, healthy men, suggesting a stress-induced systemic pressor response.

Limitations

This study has the following limitations. First, only young, healthy men were included. This was due to the difficulty in recruiting other populations, and we sought to examine young male individuals in this pilot study. Further studies in other populations, such as women, older individuals, and hypertensive patients, are needed because inter-population differences in vascular response to acute MS have been reported previously [2224]. Second, ankle BP measurements were not taken during acute MS; this should be addressed in future studies to formulate the assessment of stress response using ankle BP.

Abbreviations

BP

Blood pressure

CON

Control

CVD

Cardiovascular disease

DBP

Diastolic blood pressure

HR

Heart rate

MS

Mental stress

SBP

Systolic blood pressure

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Okinawa University (#2018-03) and conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The purpose, experimental procedure, and risks associated with the study were fully explained to all participants, and they provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and material

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (#20K11480 to DK).

Authors' contributions

DK and MN conceived and designed the study. DK and MN performed the experiments. DK and MN analyzed the data. DK, MN, NH, and HE interpreted the results of the experiments. DK drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the study participants.

 

References

  1. de Boer D, Ring C, Carroll D. Time course and mechanisms of hemoconcentration in response to mental stress. Biol Psychol. 2006;72:318–24.
  2. Liu X, Ishimatsu K, Sotoyama M, Iwakiri K. Positive emotion inducement modulates cardiovascular responses caused by mental work. J Physiol Anthropol. 2016;35:27.
  3. Steptoe A, Marmot M. Impaired cardiovascular recovery following stress predicts 3-year increases in blood pressure. J Hypertens. 2005;23:529–36.
  4. Steptoe A, Marmot M. Psychosocial, hemostatic, and inflammatory correlates of delayed poststress blood pressure recovery. Psychosom Med. 2006;68:531–7.
  5. Hayashi N, Someya N, Endo MY, Miura A, Fukuba Y. Vasoconstriction and blood flow responses in visceral arteries to mental task in humans. Exp Physiol. 2006;91:215–20.
  6. Kume D, Nishiwaki M, Hotta N, Endoh H. Impact of acute mental stress on segmental arterial stiffness. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020;120:2247–57.
  7. Kivimäki M, Steptoe A. Effects of stress on the development and progression of cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15:215–29.
  8. Chida Y, Steptoe A. Greater cardiovascular responses to laboratory mental stress are associated with poor subsequent cardiovascular risk status: a meta-analysis of prospective evidence. Hypertension. 2010;55:1026–32.
  9. Stone K, Fryer S, Faulkner J, Meyer ML, Heffernan K, Kucharska-Newton A, et al. Associations of lower-limb atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis with cardiovascular risk factors and disease in older adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Atherosclerosis. 2021;S0021-9150(21)01412-X. Online ahead of print.
  10. Hietanen H, Pääkkönen R, Salomaa V. Ankle and exercise blood pressures as predictors of coronary morbidity and mortality in a prospective follow-up study. J Hum Hypertens. 2010;24:577–84.
  11. Hietanen H, Pääkkönen R, Salomaa V. Ankle blood pressure as a predictor of total and cardiovascular mortality. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2008;8:3.
  12. Kume D, Nishiwaki M, Hotta N, Endoh H. Acute mental stress-caused arterial stiffening can be counteracted by brief aerobic exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121:1359–66.
  13. Vlachopoulos C, Kosmopoulou F, Alexopoulos N, Ioakeimidis N, Siasos G, Stefanadis C. Acute mental stress has a prolonged unfavorable effect on arterial stiffness and wave reflections. Psychosom Med. 2006;68:231–7.
  14. Callister R, Suwarno NO, Seals DR. Sympathetic activity is influenced by task difficulty and stress perception during mental challenge in humans. J Physiol. 1992;454:373–87.
  15. Caslin HL, Franco RL, Crabb EB, Huang CJ, Bowen MK, Acevedo EO. The effect of obesity on inflammatory cytokine and leptin production following acute mental stress. Psychophysiology. 2016;53:151–8.
  16. Reims HM, Sevre K, Fossum E, Høieggen A, Eide I, Kjeldsen SE. Plasma catecholamines, blood pressure responses and perceived stress during mental arithmetic stress in young men. Blood Press. 2004;13:287–94.
  17. Carter JR, Kupiers NT, Ray CA. Neurovascular responses to mental stress. J Physiol. 2005;564:321–7.
  18. Fairfax ST, Padilla J, Vianna LC, Davis MJ, Fadel PJ. Spontaneous bursts of muscle sympathetic nerve activity decrease leg vascular conductance in resting humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;304:H759-66.
  19. Vranish JR, Holwerda SW, Young BE, Credeur DP, Patik JC, Barbosa TC, et al. Exaggerated vasoconstriction to spontaneous bursts of muscle sympathetic nerve activity in healthy young Black men. Hypertension. 2018;71:192–8.
  20. Wilkinson IB, MacCallum H, Hupperetz PC, van Thoor CJ, Cockcroft JR, Webb DJ. Changes in the derived central pressure waveform and pulse pressure in response to angiotensin II and noradrenaline in man. J Physiol. 2001;530:541–50.
  21. Jeong JH, Brown ML, Kapuku G, Harshfield GA, Park J. α-Adrenergic receptor blockade attenuates pressor response during mental stress in young black adults. Physiol Rep. 2021;8:e14642.
  22. Yang H, Drummer TD, Carter JR. Sex differences in sympathetic neural and limb vascular reactivity to mental stress in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;304:H435–43.
  23. Heffernan MJ, Patel HM, Muller MD. Forearm vascular responses to mental stress in healthy older adults. Physiol Rep. 2013;1:e00180.
  24. Palatini P, Bratti P, Palomba D, Bonso E, Saladini F, Benetti E, Casiglia E. BP reactivity to public speaking in stage 1 hypertension: influence of different task scenarios. Blood Press. 2011;20:290–5.