The protective effect of aspirin-induced temporary threshold shift in an animal model of cisplatin-related ototoxicity

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1576434/v1

Abstract

purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether induction of temporary threshold shift (TTS) with aspirin prior to cisplatin exposure can prevent or minimize cisplatin detrimental effects on hearing.

Methods: We randomly divided BALB mice into three groups: ]1[ cisplatin only, ]2[ aspirin only, and ]3[ combined aspirin/cisplatin. Cisplatin was administered as a single intraperitoneal injection of 14 mg/kg. Aspirin was administered for three weeks via intraperitoneal injection of 200 mg/kg sodium salicylate, twice daily. Air conduction thresholds were recorded using Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR). Cochleae were harvested and cochlear hair cells were counted using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

Results: Aspirin-induced TTS have reached an average of 30.05±16.9 dB after two weeks. At 60 days, cisplatin-only treated mice experienced an average threshold shifts of 50.7 dB at 4 kHz, 35.16 dB at 8 kHz, 70dB at 16 kHz, 53.1 dB at 32 kHz. All threshold shifts were significantly worse than for cisplatin/aspirin treated mice with TTS of 11.85 dB at 4 kHz, 3.58 dB at 8 kHz, 16.58 dB at 16 kHz, 20.41dB at 32 kHz (p<0.01). Cochlear cell count with SEM has shown reduction in the number of both inner and outer hair cells in the mid-turn in cisplatin treated mice.

Conclusion: Aspirin induced TTS can protect from cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. This beneficial effect was demonstrated by auditory thresholds as well as SEM. Larger pre-clinical and clinical studies are still needed to confirm these findings.

Background

Cisplatin is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent [13]. Its main reported side effects are nephrotoxicity, peripheral neurotoxicity, and ototoxicity [1, 2]. Cisplatin-induced hearing loss occurs as the result of cochlear damage [4] which typically begins at the base of the cochlea and penetrates towards the apex with increasing cumulative exposure [5]. Cochlear damage includes injury to the stria vascularis [4], spiral ganglion neurons [6] inner and outer hair cells [7] as well as supporting cells [8]. The degree of cisplatin ototoxicity is dose dependent, but also varies, though to a lesser extent, with different treatment schedules and administration routes [7, 9].

In clinical use, cisplatin causes a symmetric hearing loss in 69% of patients, measuring between 15 and 65 dB in the 4,000- to 8,000-Hz range, and in 100% of patients if extended high-frequency audiometry (> 8,000 Hz) is used. In general, hearing loss is permanent, with some sporadic and partial recovery [10]

As the mechanism of cisplatin ototoxicity lies primarily in oxidative damage to the outer hair cells, previous animal studies have evaluated the administration of antioxidants for preventing cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Systemic administration of either L- or D-methionine before Cisplatin treatment reduced ototoxic and nephrotoxic side effects but were also associated with an unwanted partial tumor-sparing effect [11]. Similar decreased chemotherapeutic efficacy of cisplatin has been reported for sodium thiosulfate co-treatment [1213].

Aspirin, and its active ingredient, salicylate, is a commonly used antipyretic, analgesic and anti-inflammatory drug. In contrast to forementioned antioxidants (methionine and sodium thiosulfate), aspirin did not inhibit the anti-tumor efficacy of cisplatin [14, 15]. Several studies evaluated the protective effect of aspirin on the ototoxic effect of cisplatin. Li et al. [14] and Minami et al. [16] demonstrated aspirin protective effect on cisplatin ototoxicity in rats. Both used a short regimen of aspirin treatment and followed the animals for a short period of time and demonstrated significant although partial otoprotection.

Beyond its antioxidative effect, aspirin affects uniquely the inner ear. Continuous aspirin administration at high doses induces for itself hearing loss and tinnitus [17, 18]. However, its effect is reversible [14, 16, 19]. In humans receiving high doses of 4g daily, temporary threshold shift (TTS) of 10-40dB develops and persists throughout the period of drug administration. Hearing thresholds typically returns to their pre-treatment level after aspirin administration is stopped [18, 20, 21]. TTS induced by high doses of aspirin can theoretically be associated with reduced metabolic activity of cochlear elements and may be associated with improved resilience of the cochlea to damaging insults. Such resilience is similar to tissue preservation achieved in brain and cardiac surgeries using hypothermia to reduce metabolic rate (hibernation) [2223]. Hypometabolic effect of hypothermia was found to be otoprotective as well. In a study by Spankovich et al, a reduction in Cisplatin-induced hearing loss after cold water irrigation of guinea pigs external auditory canal was demonstrated [24]. Moreover, hypothermia was effective also in preventing noise induced hearing loss as well as cochlear trauma induced by electrode insertion in cochlear implantation in animal models [2528]. Hypothermia is not feasible as a treatment option for patients receiving cisplatin, however a pharmacologic agent that can induce hypometabolism of the cochlea has the potential to protect from its ototoxicity.

Clinical studies have failed to demonstrate the hearing-protective effects of aspirin shown in pre-clinical studies. In a phase 2, double-blind, randomised controlled trial in patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy for multiple cancer types [15], short pre-treatment with aspirin did not protect from cisplatin-related ototoxicity.

At present, there are no approved treatments to prevent ototoxicity in patients undergoing cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Our hypothesis was that in addition to its protective anti-inflammatory or anti-oxidative effect, high doses of aspirin may reduce cochlear activity, manifested as temporary threshold shift (TTS). Reduction in cochlear activity and metabolism may increase cochlear resilience to the damaging effects of cisplatin. We, therefore, explored in an animal model the protective effects of aspirin associated TTS against cisplatin induced ototoxicity, using auditory brainstem responses and scanning electron microscopy.

Methods

Animals

A total of 20, 8-weeks old male BALB/cJ micewith a weight ranging from 20 gm to 25 gm were randomly divided into three groups: (1) cisplatin only (n = 7), (2) aspirin only (n = 7), and (3) combined aspirin/cisplatin (n = 6). The BALB/cJ mouse strain was chosen due to a previous study by DeBacker et al., that have demonstrated cisplatin induced ABR threshold shift differences between mouse strains, sexes, and dosing schedules. In comparison with other strains, the BALB/cJ strain had lower mortality rates and marked hearing loss following a single cisplatin injection [29].

All mice were purchased from ENVIGO and thereafter shipped and housed in a vivarium maintained by Felsenstein Research Center of the Rabin Medical Center and Tel Aviv University. The mice were acclimated to the vivarium for one week prior to beginning of ABR analysis, aspirin and/or cisplatin exposures. Following cisplatin administration, all mice were single housed in an isolated area. All animals treated with salicylate or cisplatin were monitored daily for signs of distress, pain and weight loss of above 20% of baseline.

All housing and experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by Rabin Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (020502).

Auditory brainstem response

Animals were anesthetized with inhalant isoflurane (5% for induction and 1.8% for maintenance of anaesthesia with a 1 L/min oxygen flow rate).

Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were measured using the SmartEP software, version 5.33 and stimuli was provided through the Opti-Amp 8002 and two high frequency transducers (Intelligent Hearing Systems, Miami, USA). A differential active needle electrode was placed subcutaneously below the test ear, a reference electrode below the contralateral ear, and a ground electrode at the vertex. ABR thresholds were recorded for each ear separately in response to 4, 8, 16, and 32 kHz. The stimulus consisted of 15 ms tone bursts, with a rise-fall time of 1 ms. The stimuli were presented to the external auditory meatus in a closed acoustic system through a tube connected to the high frequency transducer. Using a costume software, ABRs were averaged across one thousand and twenty-four tone presentations, delivered at 10 times per second. Hearing threshold was defined as the lowest intensity of stimulation that yielded a repeatable ABR response.

Cisplatin and salicylate exposure and ABR protocol

Cisplatin was administered as a single intraperitoneal injection of 14 mg/kg as previously performed by Hill et al. [30].

Aspirin was administered for three weeks via intraperitoneal injection of 200 mg/kg sodium salicylate (Sigma -St. Louis, MO), twice daily. In the combined aspirin/cisplatin group, aspirin was administered for 14 days prior and 7 days after cisplatin administration. Our protocol of long-term aspirin administration and dosage was selected to attain a sustained threshold shift [3133]

ABR recordings were performed at the following intervals:

- Aspirin-Cisplatin group: (a) baseline, prior to administration of both drugs, (b) immediately prior to cisplatin administration, after 14 days of aspirin treatment, (c) 7 days after cisplatin administration at the completion of aspirin treatment, (d) 30 days and (e) 60 days after cisplatin exposure.

- Cisplatin-only group: (a) baseline, prior to cisplatin exposure, (c) 7 days after cisplatin administration, (d) 30 days and (e) 60 days after cisplatin exposure.

- Aspirin-only group: (a) baseline, prior to administration of aspirin, (b) after 14 days of aspirin treatment, (c) at the completion 21 days of aspirin treatment, (d) 30 days and (e) 60 days after measurement b.

Scanning electron microscopy

Mice were sacrificed according to ethical guidelines and inner ears were dissected in cold PBS buffer and fixed in glutaraldehyde (2.5% v/v in PBS) overnight at 4°C. The organ of Corti (n = 3 from each treatment group) was exposed, and the sample was treated with alternating incubations in osmium tetroxide and thiocarbohydrazide (OTOTO method; Hunter-Duvar, 1978). Treated samples were critical point dried and gold-coated at the Faculty of Life Sciences Electron Microscopy Unit at Tel Aviv University and imaged with a JSM 540A scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Jeol). Using the images compiled in Adobe Photoshop, hair cells were counted using the SEM images. Intact stereocilia bundles were counted directly and considered as one cell. In case of impaired or highly disrupted bundle cell was considered damaged and were not counted. Apex and Mid turn were each counted using 3 biological repeats with 2 fields of view acquired each at 340X magnification and averaged, while Basal turn was counted using 2 biological repeats with 2 fields of view per treatment in similar magnification.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software, version 21.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). All values are presented as mean ± SD. Comparison between means of non-parametric variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney test. Normal distributed variables were compared with student t-test. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Average auditory thresholds of the three study groups, in response to 4,8,16 and 32 kHz TB stimuli are presented in Table 1 and Figs. 2a-d respectively. 

 
Table 1

ABR threshold shifts in dB SPL in 4, 8, 16 and 32 kHz for the three study groups at 60 days after cisplatin exposure (and the equivalent for the aspirin-only group – 53 days after completion of aspirin treatment).

 

4kHz

8kHz

16kHz

32kHz

Cisplatin Only

(n = 7)

51

35

70

53

Aspirin-Cisplatin

(n = 6)

12

4

17

20

Aspirin Only

(n = 6)

17

4

18

14

A- Average ABR measure before aspirin administration, B- Average ABR measure before cisplatin administration, C- Average ABR measure 7 days after cisplatin administration, D- Average ABR measure 30 days after cisplatin administration, E- Average ABR measure 60 days after cisplatin administration

Aspirin-only induced TTS reached an average of 34.85 ± 22.34 dB at 4 kHz, 21.78 ± 24.49dB at 8 kHz, 33.57 ± 25.07 dB at 16 kHz, 26.92 ± 17.26 dB at 32 kHz from baseline after two weeks, that reversed to 16.64 ± 18.37 at 4 kHz, 3.78 ± 11.08 at 8 kHz, 17.85 ± 19.58 at 16 kHz, 14.28 ± 21.47 at 32 kHz from baseline at 60 days.

Comparison between ‘cisplatin-only’ and ‘combined cisplatin/aspirin’ groups demonstrated a significant otoprotective effect. Sixty days after cisplatin administration, cisplatin-only treated mice had an average threshold shifts of 50.7 ± 14.7 dB at 4 kHz, 35.1 ± 22.6 dB at 8 kHz, 70 ± 19.9 dB at 16 kHz and 53.1 ± 22.1 dB at 32 kHz, which were significantly worse than for cisplatin/aspirin treated mice that experienced an average threshold shift of 11.85 ± 10.89 dB at 4 kHz, 3.58 ± 8.1 dB at 8 kHz, 16.58 ± 16.57 dB at 16 kHz, 20.41 ± 16.84 dB at 32 kHz (p < 0.01). Comparison between aspirin-only and cisplatin/aspirin groups demonstrated no significant difference in thresholds between the groups after 60 days. Figure 3 presents the thresholds changes for the three treatment group.

Cochlear scanning electron microscopy results are presented in Table 2 and Fig. 4. In comparison with mice from the aspirin-only group, mice treated with cisplatin had reduction in the number of both inner hair cells (IHC) and outer hair cells (OHC). The damaging effect of cisplatin was more complete at the basal turn, where the protective effect of aspirin was minimal. However, at the middle turn cisplatin caused partial destruction of hair cells, and aspirin was found to be protective with similar counts of both inner hair cells and outer hair cells in aspirin-only and aspirin-cisplatin groups (OHC: 154, 151; IHC: 49, 47, respectively) and better than in the cisplatin-only group (OHC: 70; IHC:33). 

 
Table 2

Outer and Inner Hair cell counts in the basal and middle cochlear turns for the three study groups

 

Outer Hair cells

Inner hair cells

 

Basal turn

Middle turn

Basal turn

Middle turn

Cisplatin (n = 3)

0

70

5

33

Asp-Cis (n = 3)

0

151

10

47

Aspirin (n = 3)

43

154

36

49

Discussion

Cisplatin is an indispensable antitumor agent, and currently there is no effective treatment for preventing its toxicity to the inner ear. In the present study we have demonstrated that aspirin, in high doses of 200 mg/kg, twice daily, at a long-term administration of 21 days, produces a temporary threshold shift that is mostly reversible. Aspirin administration at these levels can significantly reduce cisplatin-related sensorineural hearing loss in BALB mice, and can protect from the associate damage to inner and outer hair cells.

In our animal model, we have effectively induced the ototoxic effect of cisplatin. Cisplatin detrimental effect on hearing was maximal at 30 days after exposure in all frequencies (average difference from baseline of 58.16 ± 9.48 dB across all frequencies). At the last measurement 60 days after cisplatin exposure, mice demonstrated threshold shift from baseline of 52.26 ± 14.78 dB (averaged for the four frequencies tested).

Aspirin effect has reached a maximal average threshold shift of 30.05 ± 16.9 dB (across four frequencies) after 21 days of aspirin treatment. This effect was almost completely reversible with a threshold shift from baseline of only 13.14 ± 14.31dB after 60 days. Interestingly, threshold shift did not reverse after 30 days from end of aspirin administration (30.51 ± 6.94 dB) and continued to improve between 30 and 60 days. This gradual improvement in threshold after exposure to aspirin was different than the recovery period demonstrated by earlier studies in humans. McCabe and Dey [21] were among the first studies that measured the effect of short-term systemic aspirin administration in humans. Their regimen consisted of 4 days period of 5 gr per day of aspirin. Hearing loss recovery was noted 72 hours after aspirin cessation in all subjects. A similar recovery period was noted in a study by Myers and Bernstein [32], that examined hearing loss in patients that were administrated high aspirin dose of 6–8 gr per day for a period that was not mentioned. A recent animal study by Huang et al. [34] used salicylate in high dose regimens and had shown a longer recovery period. They measured distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in guinea pigs after two weeks administration of salicylate (200 mg/kg sodium salicylate, twice daily) and demonstatred a similar slow reduction of the distortion after salicylate cessation that returned to normal levels after four weeks. In the present study we have demonstrated threshold improvement between the 30- and 60-days measurements in all groups. These differences in the timing of threshold improvement may relate to a longer treatment regimen in our study that was intended to achieve maximal TTS.

Previous studies examined the protective effect of short-term aspirin treatment prior to cisplatin administration. Li et al. examined aspirin protective effect on cisplatin ototoxicity in rats [14]. In their study, they administered 100 mg/kg salicylate BID from 2 days before to 3 days after cisplatin treatment. Salicylate significantly attenuated the cisplatin-induced threshold shift from approximately 20 dB to 5dB at 10 days post-treatment. Similar results were presented by Minami et al [16] and Surnar et al [19]. However, in a phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial aspirin failed to protect from cisplatin ototoxicity [15]. As aspirin protocol regimen relied on the pre-clinical results by Li et al [14], cisplatin treated patients were randomized for a co-administration of 975 mg TID aspirin, one day prior and four days after cisplatin treatment. It is possible that the short-term administration of aspirin did not produce a temporary threshold shift.

Both aspirin induced TTS and ototoxic effect of cisplatin were observed in high and low frequencies suggesting that their effect involved different regions of the cochlea. A scanning electron microscopy images have shown severe hair cells damage at the basal turn compared with partial destruction at the middle turn. Basal turn hair cell loss combined with high frequency hearing loss were observed in previous studies. A study by Kamimura et al. has shown an extensive damage to outer hair cells, especially in the basal turn of the cochlea by Cisplatin [38]. Similar basal turn damage with high frequency hearing loss was noted in a study by Cardinaal et al [39] and Hyppolito (40).

At the last ABR recording, hearing threshold in the aspirin-only group has improved significantly. However, threshold at the end of the study in that group was increased by 13.14 ± 14.31dB compared to baseline measurement. At that time point, mice were aged 5–6 months. The BALB/c mice strain is characterized by early hearing loss and therefore also serves as a model for age-related hearing loss. In a study by Szepesy et al. [41] a similar progression of hearing thresholds was noted in all frequencies. Willott et al. [42], demonstrated in BALB/c mice model that aging was associated with progressive loss of hair cells and spiral ganglion cells (SGCs), most prominently between 4 and 10 months of age. In addition, they have noted that although loss of hair cells was most severe in the cochlear base, aging BALB/c mice had relatively more SGC loss in the apex. In our study we did not enroll a control group that received no treatment and therefore cannot determine whether threshold shift at 60 days after aspirin treatment is the result of aspirin exposure or aging.

Conslusions

This study demonstrated that aspirin at doses inducing auditory TTS can protect from cisplatin ototoxicity. The protective effect was manifested both in ABR recordings and in scanning electron microscopy findings. These promising results suggest that aspirin can be used as a protective agent in patients treated with cisplatin. Larger pre-clinical and clinical studies are still needed to confirm these findings.

Abbreviations

ABR - Auditory Brainstem Responses 

TTS - temporary threshold shift 

SEM - scanning electron microscope 

IHC- inner hair cells 

OHC - outer hair cells

DPOAEs - distortion product otoacoustic emissions 

SGCs - spiral ganglion cells

BID - twice a day

TID - three times a day

Declarations

Ethics approval 

- All housing and experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by Rabin Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (020502).

Consent for publication 

- Not applicable

Availability of data and materials 

- The data generated in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author

Competing interests 

- The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Funding 

- This study was supported by a research grant provided by Rabin Medical Center, Israel.

Authors' contributions

S.T. performed the majority of the experimental work and wrote the manuscript, A.M. conceptualized the research, reviewed, and edited the manuscript, N.B performed the experimental work, S.S performed the histological analysis, E.Y performed the experimental work, Y.A conceptualized the research, reviewed, and edited the manuscript and O.H conceptualized the research, reviewed, and edited the manuscript.

Acknowledgement

- We thank Advanced Bionics for their technical support and guidance and Dr. Ofir Zavdy for illustration assistance.

References

  1. Rybak L.P, Whitworth CA, Mukherjea D, Ramkumar V. Mechansims of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and prevention. Hear Res. 2007, 226, 157–167.
  2. Rybak LP, Mukherjea D, Jajoo S, Ramkumar V. Cisplatin ototoxicity and protection: clinical and experimental studies. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2009, 219, 177–186.
  3. .3. Hill GW, Morest D.K, Parham K. Cisplatin-Induced ototoxicity: Effect of intatympanic dexamethasone injections. Otol. Neurotol. 2008, 29, 1005–1011.
  4. Lanvers-Kaminsky C, Zehnhoff-Dinnesen AAM, Parfitt, R, Ciarimboli G. Drug-induced ototoxicity: mechanisms, Pharmacogenetics, and protective strategies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Apr;101(4):491-500.
  5. Komune S, Asakuma S, Snow JB. Pathophysiology of the ototoxicity of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1981;89(2):275-82.
  6. Boheim K, Bichler E. Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity: audiometric findings and experimental cochlear pathology. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 1985;242(1):1-6.
  7. Cardinaal RM, de Groot JCMJ, Huizing EH, Veldman JE, Smoorenburg GF. Dose-dependent effect of 8-day cisplatin administration upon the morphology of the albino Guinea pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 2000 Jun;144(1-2):135-46.
  8. Laurell G, Bagger-Sjoback D. Degeneration of the organ of Corti following intravenous administration of cisplatin. Acta Otolaryngol. 1991;111(5):891-8.
  9. Laurell G, Bagger-Sjoback D. Dose-dependent inner ear changes after i.v. administration of cisplatin. J Otolaryngol 2000;20: 158–67
  10. Moroso MJ, Blair RL. A review of cis-platinum ototoxicity. J Otolaryngol 1983;12:365–9
  11. Reser D, Rho M, Dewan D, Herbst L, Li G, Stupak H, Zur K, Romaine J, Frenz D, Goldbloom L, Kopke R, Arezzo J, Van De Water T. L- and D- methionine provide equivalent long term protection against CDDP-induced ototoxicity in vivo, with partial in vitro and in vivo retention of antineoplastic activity. Neurotoxicology. 1999 Oct;20(5):731-48
  12. Inoue M, Shimizu C, Shimizu H, Tanizawa O. Neutralizing effect of sodium thiosulfate on antitumor efficacy of cisplatin for human carcinoma xenografts in nude mice. Gynecol Oncol. 1991 Jan;40(1):34-7.
  13. Aamdal S, Fodstad O, Pihl A. Sodium thiosulfate fails to increase the therapeutic index of intravenously administered cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) in mice bearing murine and human tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1988;21(2):129-33.
  14. Li G, Sha SH, Zotova E, Arezzo J, Van de Water T, Schacht J. Salicylate protects hearing and kidney function from cisplatin toxicity without compromising its oncolytic action. Lab Invest 2002;82(5):585e96
  15. Crabb SJ, Martin K, Abab J, Ratcliffe I, Thornton R, Lineton B, Ellis M, Moody R, Stanton L, Galanopoulou A, Maishman T, Geldart T, Bayne M, Davies J, Lamb C, Popat S, Joffe JK, Nutting C, Chester J, Hartley A, Thomas G, Ottensmeier C, Huddart R, King E. COAST (Cisplatin ototoxicity attenuated by aspirin trial): A phase II double-blind, randomised controlled trial to establish if aspirin reduces cisplatin induced hearing-loss. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Dec; 87:75-83.
  16. Minami SB, Sha SH, Schacht J. Antioxidant protection in a new animal model of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Hear Res. 2004 Dec;198(1-2):137-43
  17. Sheppard A, Hayes SH, Chen GD, Ralli M, Salvi R. Review of salicylate-induced hearing loss, neurotoxicity, tinnitus and neuropathophysiology. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014; Apr;34(2):79-93
  18. McFadden d, Plattsmier HS. Aspirin can potentiate the temporary hearing loss induced by intense sounds. Hearing Research. 1983 Mar;9(3):295-316
  19. Surnar B, Kolishetti N, Basu U, Ahmad A, Goka E, Marples B, Kolb D, Lippman ME, Dhar S. Reduction of Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity without Compromising Its Antitumor Activity. Biochemistry . 2018 Nov 20;57(46):6500-6513
  20. Crifò S. Aspirin ototoxicity in the guinea pig. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1975;37(1):27-34.
  21. Mccabe PA, Dey FL. the effect of aspirin upon auditory sensitivity Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1965; Jun; 74:312-25.
  22. Engelman R, Baker RA, Likosky DS, Grigore A, Dickinson TA, Shore-Lesserson L, Hammon JW. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and The American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Bypass--Temperature Management during Cardiopulmonary Bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2015 Sep;47(3):145-54.
  23. Hong JM, Lee JS, Song HJ, Jeong HS, Choi HA, Lee K. Therapeutic hypothermia after recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):134-40.
  24. Spankovich C, Lobarinas E, Ding D, Salvi R, Le Prell CG. Assessment of thermal treatment via irrigation of external ear to reduce cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Hear Res. 2016; 332:55–60
  25. Henry KR. Hyperthermia exacerbates and hypothermia protects from noise-induced threshold elevation of the cochlear nerve envelope response in the C57BL/6J mouse. Hear Res. 2003; 179:88–96
  26. Hildesheimer M, Henkin Y, Muchnik C, Anafi R, Sahartov E, Rubinstein M. Sedation effect on temporary threshold shift induced by acoustic overstimulation. Hear Res. 1991 Jan;51(1):161-6. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(91)90014-z.
  27. Tamames I, King C, Bas E, Dietrich WD, Telischi F, Rajguru SM. A cool approach to reducing electrode-induced trauma: localized therapeutic hypothermia conserves residual hearing in cochlear implantation. Hear Res. 2016; 339:32–9
  28. Balkany TJ, Eshraghi AA, Jiao H, Polak M, Mou C, Dietrich DW, et al. Mild hypothermia protects auditory function during cochlear implant surgery. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115:1543–7
  29. DeBacker JR, Harrison RT, Bielefeld EC. Cisplatin-induced threshold shift in the CBA/CaJ, C57BL/6J, BALB/Cj mouse models of hearing loss. Hear Res. 2020 Mar 1;387:107878.
  30. Hill GW, Morest DK, Parham K. Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity: Effect of Intratympanic Dexamethasone Injections. Otol Neurotol. 2008 October; 29(7): 1005–1011
  31. Hu SS, Mei L, Chen JY, Huang ZW, Wu H. Effects of salicylate on the inflammatory genes expression and synaptic ultrastructure in the cochlear nucleus of rats. Inflammation. 2014;37(2):365-73. 
  32. Myers EN, Bernstein JM. Salicylate ototoxicity; a clinical and experimental study. Arch Otolaryngol. 1965 Nov;82(5):483-93
  33. N Yu, M-L Zhu, B Johnson, Y-P Liu, R O Jones, H-B Zhao. Prestin up-regulation in chronic salicylate (aspirin) administration: an implication of functional dependence of prestin expression. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008 Aug;65(15):2407-18
  34. Huang ZW, Luo Y, Wu Z, Tao Z, Jones RO, Zhao HB. Paradoxical enhancement of active cochlear mechanics in long-term administration of salicylate. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93(4):2053-61.
  35. Henry KR. Hyperthermia exacerbates and hypothermia protects from noise-induced threshold elevation of the cochlear nerve envelope response in the C57BL/6J mouse. Hear Res. 2003 May;179(1-2):88-96.
  36. Henry KR. Effects of noise, hypothermia and barbiturate on cochlear electrical activity. Audiology. 1980;19(1):44-56.
  37. Bader W, Gottfried T, Degenhart G, Johnson Chacko L, Sieber D, Riechelmann H, Fischer N, Hoermann R, Glueckert R, Schrott-Fischer A, Schmutzhard J.Measurement of the Intracochlear Hypothermia Distribution Utilizing Tympanic Cavity Hypothermic Rinsing Technique in a Cochlea Hypothermia Model. Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 11;11:620691.
  38. Kamimura T, Whitworth CA, Rybak LP. Effect of 4-methylthiobenzoic acid on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in the rat. Hear Res. 1999 May;131(1-2):117-27.
  39. Cardinaal RM, Groot JCMJ, Huizing EH, Veldman JE, Smoorenburg GF. Dose-dependent effect of 8-day cisplatin administration upon the morphology of the albino guinea pig cochlea. Hearing Res. 2000; 144:135–146
  40. Hyppolito MA, de Oliveira JA, Rossato M. Cisplatin ototoxicity and otoprotection with sodium salicylate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Sep;263(9):798-803
  41. Szepesy J, Humli V, Farkas J, Miklya I, Tímár J, Tábi T, Gáborján A, Polony G, Szirmai Á, Tamás L, Köles L, Vizi ES, Zelles T. Chronic Oral Selegiline Treatment Mitigates Age-Related Hearing Loss in BALB/c Mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 11;22(6):2853.
  42. Willott JF, Turner JG, Carlson S, Ding D, Seegers Bross L, Falls WA. The BALB/c mouse as an animal model for progressive sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res. 1998 Jan;115(1-2):162-74