The link between the consumption of dairy products with 10-year Framingham risk Score among women

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1586663/v1

Abstract

Background

Given that in Iran women are more at risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) than men, the aim of the present study was to investigate the consumption of dairy products in relation to Framingham risk Score (FRS) and cardiovascular risk factors in women.

Methods

371 women aged 18 to 50 years were recruited in this cross-sectional study. A validated and reliable food frequency questionnaire was used to measure diet. A 10-year odds of developing CVD between participants was predicted using FRS.

Results

Higher intake of total dairy, low-fat and high-fat dairy products was associated with higher FRS, but receiving each dairy, in particular, had nothing to do with FRS. Doogh consumption was directly associated with fasting blood sugar (FBS) (Odds ratio (OR): 14.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.97, 101.03; P = 0.999). Also intake of high-fat dairy was directly correlated with serum levels of triglyceride (TAG) (OR: 4.47, 95% CI: 1.75, 11.43; P = 0.999). However, no correlation was observed between dairy products and other CVD risk factors.

Conclusions

Overall, consumption of doogh and high-fat dairy products was correlated with greater serum levels of FBS and TAG, respectively. Intake of total dairy, low-fat and high-fat dairy products was also associated with higher FRS. Future studies are needed to elucidate the link between dairy consumption and risk factors of CVD to characterize gender differences.

Background

Non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), are one of the major causes of death and morbidity in recent years. About16 million deaths annually are attributed to CVDs⁽¹⁾ It is predicted that in Iran the prevalence of CVDs will be doubled in 2050 compared to 2005⁽²⁾. A part of this considerable prevalence can be explained by the rapid transition of nutrition and adverse changes in dietary habits⁽³⁾. Modifying CVD-related risk factors could be considered as a priority for reducing the mortality rate in each population. Several modifiable risk factors, including hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, sedentary lifestyle, unhealthy diets, smoking, and obesity, have been suggested to increase CVD risks⁽²⁾. Previous studies showed that high triglyceride levels (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) were observed in 40.2% of the Iranian population aged 30 and over. In addition, the prevalence of hypertension and obesity in this population was 36.1% and 22.7%, respectively⁽⁴⁾. Based on evidence, women are more likely than men to develop risk factors of CVD such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercholesterolemia⁽⁴˒⁵⁾. Therefore, women are more at risk for CVDs in Iran⁽⁶⁾. Improving risk factors, including eating habits, can decrease clinical events in CVD people, as well as in people at high risk for cardiovascular disease because of ≥ 1 risk factors, and a varied and balanced diet under a healthy lifestyle is considered to be the most important strategy for CVD prevention⁽⁷⁾.

Most dietary guidelines recommend milk and dairy products consumption as a main part of a well-balanced, healthy diet⁽⁸˒⁹⁾. Dairy products are a various food group, a number are non-fermented (such as milk), and others (such as cheese and yogurt) are fermented⁽¹⁰⁾, which different types can result in different outcomes of health, and this might be due to fat content and other components of dairy group⁽¹¹⁾. There are beneficial products in dairy products such as saturated fats with medium-chain and odd-chain, spherical phospholipids, special amino acids, natural trans fats, branched-chain and unsaturated fats, vitamin K1 and K2, and calcium. Vitamin K2, found naturally in fermented dairy products, has been proposed to reduce Coronary Heart Diseases (CHD) and aortic calcification⁽¹²٬¹³⁾. Dairy can contain probiotics, which many of them may have health consequences.

Dairy products are also a major saturated fat food source. Dairy fat is often portrayed as a negative part of dairy products, largely due to its high energy density and rich source of cholesterol⁽⁹⁾. Saturated fat intake enhances low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)⁽¹⁴⁾ and the LDL-C to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio⁽⁹⁾. It may lead to chronic inflammation, which based on this and also based on the data obtained from ecological studies, receiving dairy products has long been considered as a risk factor in cardiovascular diseases⁽¹⁵٬¹⁶⁾. In a cohort study, dairy fat consumption in women was associated with a slight increase in Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) mortality⁽¹⁷⁾. On the other hand, a meta-analysis of cohort studies on the risk of cardiovascular disease and milk did not provide any convincing evidence that milk was harmful, offering that milk drinking might be correlated with a small but valuable reduction in stroke risk and heart disease⁽¹⁸⁾. Moreover, in a cohort study, consuming more total dairy (> 2 servings per day) was correlated with a lower cardiovascular mortality risk compared to not consuming it, and similar relationships were observed for low-fat and high-fat dairy products⁽¹⁹⁾.

The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) is one of accurate and reliable risk prediction tools in the long term. It was used in Framingham Heart Study data to determine a person's 10-year chance of developing CVDs⁽²⁰⁾. FRS considers six coronary artery risk factors including sex, age, smoking habits, TC, HDL-C, and systolic blood pressure⁽²¹⁾. Notably, the validity and reliability of this tool for predicting CVDs risk in Iranian populations have been previously reported⁽⁷ ̵ ¹⁰⁾.

Numerous studies have examined the correlation between dairy consumption and the risk of CVDs. Although the FRS were used in only three studies⁽¹²٬¹³٬¹⁵⁾. Of these three studies, the outcome of two studies is cardiovascular diseases, which one was conducted in Korea and found the link between milk consumption and Framingham risk score⁽¹³⁾ and another has found a general link between lifestyle and CHD⁽¹⁵⁾. Due to the contradictory results of previous studies, the geographical differences in dairy consumption⁽¹⁴⁾, and the lack of relevant reports in Iran, the present study purpose was to clarify the association between various types of dairy products (milk, yogurt, and cheese) with a 10-year risk of Framingham score.

Methods

Participants

In the present cross-sectional study, 371 women who referred to TUMS-affiliated health centers in 2020 were included. We used the following formula to calculate the sample size: N = [(Z 1-α / 2) 2 × S2] / d2⁽²²⁾.

Iranian Women aged 18 to 50 years were included. Non-Iranian subjects, pregnants, breastfeeds, menopauses, and women suffering from chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, cancer, kidney diseases, and liver dysfunctions were not included.

Written informed consent was obtained from all eligible volunteers and the Ethics Committee of Biomedical Research in Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) approved this study ethically (IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1400.208, 99-3-212-50759).

Dietary assessment

To evaluate the dietary intake of individuals, a semi-quantitative validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) including 168 items was used⁽²³⁾. We obtained the amount of dairy product consumption such as milk, yogurt, and cheese from the FFQ with the question "mean intake of dairy products with the frequency of intake (daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly intervals). Household measurements were then used to compute the grams of each dairy food item. In addition, to calculate the total daily consumption of energy and nutrients, we used the modified version of Nutritionist IV software (version 7.0; N-Squared Computing, Salem, OR, USA) for Iranian food.

Biochemical assessment

After 12 to 14 hours of fasting, blood samples were collected and biochemical assessments were performed. In this study we measured the following parameters: serum concentrations of lipid profiles including total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglyceride (TG), and fasting blood sugar (FBS) using enzymatic methods.

Cardiovascular risk assessment

We used the Framingham Risk Score to foretell the developing CVD risk during 10 years for subjects with 30–74 years old. The reliability and validity of this score to forecast the cardiovascular disease risk between the Iranian people has been proven previously⁽²⁴⁾. FRS was computed by summing scores based on six coronary risk factors, including sex, age, TC, HDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and smoking habit. We used the following cut-offs to calculate FRS: for HDL-C: < 40, 40–49, 50–59 and ≥ 60 mg/dl; and for TC: < 160, 160–199, 200–239, 240–279, and ≥ 280 mg/dl. Percentage of ten year risk was computed using total scores (Under 9 points:<1%; 9–12 points: 1%; 13–14 points: 2%; 15 points: 3%; 16 points: 4%; 17 points: 5%; 18 points: 6%; 19 points: 8%; 20 points: 11%; 21 = 14%; 22 = 17%; 23 = 22%; 24 = 27%; 25 = 30%)⁽²⁵⁾. Percentage of absolute CVD risk over 10 years was assorted as low risk (< 10%), medium risk (10–20%) and high risk (> 20%)⁽²⁵⁾.

Anthropometric assessment

Participants' height, in the normal standing situation, without shoes, was measured by a fixed bar in front of the wall, to the nearest 0.1 cm. Their weight was also calculated to the nearest 0.1 kg after taking off their shoes and with a minimum of clothes, using a digital scale, and body mass index (BMI) was obtained by dividing weight(kg) by height squared(m²). Waist circumference at the narrowest point among the last rib and the iliac crest, and hip circumference at the narrowest point among the last rib and maximum hip circumference were measured by an inelastic tape to the nearest 0.1 cm. Then we calculated the waist to hip ratio (WHR).

Other variables assessment

We measured blood pressure for each person twice before resting for at least 10 minutes while sitting using a mercury sphygmomanometer, and for the analysis, we used the mean of the two measurements. To assess the socio-economic status (SES), a reliable Persian socio-economic questionnaire was used. This questionnaire has a vast range of questions covering education, participants' occupation, income, ownership of a house or car, having modern equipment, family member number, and travels in or out of the country in the past year. We also asked participants to register their daily activities for 24 hours and the average of individuals physical activity was computed using this equation: = …..(Activity time (houre.day-1) ×MET) = PA mean (MET.hour.day-1), that activity time is the whole time of every activity during a day, MET means metabolic equivalent task derived from a reference, and the average PA is the average of physical activity.

Statistical analysis

We used the Kolmogorov Smirnov test to evaluate the normality of the dispensation of variables, and was examined by histogram curve. chi-square test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to show qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively, across dairy consumption tertiles. Using binary regression, we explored the relationship between dairy consumption and CVD risk factors including HDL-C, LDL-C, TAG and FBS level’s in the blood. The relationship between dairy intake and FRS was also assessed using ordinal regression. We employed 3 crude, controlled for energy intake, BMI, age, smoking, SES, and disease status (having osteoporosis, diabetes, lung disease, enlarged prostate, kidney and bladder problems) (Model 1) and more adjusted for antioxidant supplements (beta-carotene, selenium, coenzyme Q10, lycopene, lutein), multivitamin supplements, and drugs (thyroid, anti-diabetic) (Model 2) for statistical analysis. SPSS software (version 24 and a significance level of p-value < 0.05) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

General characteristics of 371 women across dairy tertiles are reported in Tables 1 and 2. Milk and low-fat dairy consumption were associated with age (P = 0.003 and P = 0.033, respectively). Between yogurt consumption with BMI (P = 0.017) and SES )P = 0.0001), cheese consumption with age (P = 0.034 (and weight (P = 0.003) and waist circumference (P = 0.0001) and BMI (P = 0.003) and SES (P = 0.015), and doogh consumption with age (P = 0.0001) and BMI (P = 0.016) and waist circumference (P = 0.001) and SES (P = 0.048) were observed. Consumption of high-fat dairy products was also significantly associated with age (P = 0.0001), waist circumference (P = 0.006), SES (P = 0.0001) and multivitamin supplementation (P = 0.021). However, there was no association between total dairy consumption and any of the demographic indicators (P ≥ 0.05).

Table 2

Demographic characteristics of Participants by different tertiles of low Fat dairy, high Fat dairy, and total dairy consumption among Tehranian women.

 

Tertiles of low fat dairy consumption

 

Tertiles of high fat dairy consumption

 

Tertiles of total dairy consumption

 
 

T1 < 227.49

227.49 < T2 < 362.34

T3 > 362.34

 

T1 < 15.10

15.10 < T2 < 68.71

T3 > 68.71

 

T1 < 280.6

280.6 < T2 < 446.07

T3 > 446.07

 

Number

124 (33.4ᵇ)

123 (33.2)

124 (33.4)

P value*

125 (33.7)

120 (32.3)

126 (34)

P value*

124 (33.4)

123 (33.2)

124 (33.4)

P value*

Age (year)ᵃ

29.77 ± 6.31

30.28 ± 6.69

31.96 ± 7.58

0.033*

32.61 ± 8.32

30.23 ± 5.96

29.17 ± 5.80

0.0001*

30.42 ± 6.60

30.30 ± 7.02

31.27 ± 7.18

0.487

Weight (Kg)

63.12 ± 10.72

64.51 ± 8.81

64.78 ± 12.17

0.421

63.81 ± 9.90

65 ± 11.20

63.60 ± 10.87

0.539

63.46 ± 10.81

64.43 ± 8.95

64.57 ± 11.88

0.685

BMI (Kg/m2)

24.11 ± 3.88

24.07 ± 3.38

24.60 ± 4.74

0.514

24.50 ± 3.86

24.70 ± 4.28

23.58 ± 3.91

0.068

24.40 ± 3.88

23.85 ± 3.65

24.48 ± 4.52

0.429

waist circumference (cm)

86.02 ± 10.91

84.32 ± 7.82

86.32 ± 10.01

0.216

84.56 ± 9.05

87.83 ± 11.43

84.30 ± 7.94

0.006*

86.46.10.77

84.30 ± 8.43

85.75 ± 9.51

0.211*

Smoking status(%(n))ᵇ

     

0.542

     

0.235

     

0.574

1

0.3

0

0

0

0.3

0

0.3

0

0

2

0

0.3

0.3

0

0

0.5

0

0.3

0.3

3

0

0.3

0

0

0.3

0

0.3

0

0

4

33.2

32.6

33.2

33.4

32.6

32.9

34.8

30.5

33.7

SES(%(n))

     

0.109

     

0.0001*

     

0.141

low

10.8

6.7

11.1

8.6

12.7

7.3

12.1

6.7

9.7

moderate

12.4

14.6

10.5v

18.3

7

12.1

13.7

11.9

11.9

high

12

9.4

12.4

8.3

11

14.6

9.4

12.1

12.4

Antioxidant supplements(%(n))

0.5

0

0

0.135

0.03

0

0

0.604

0.5

0

0

0.159

Multivitamin supplements(%(n))

4

5.1

4.9

0.736

3.5

7

3.5

0.021*

4

3.2

6.7

0.067

Omega 3

0.5

1.6

0.3

0.089

0.3

1.61

0.05

0.080

0.5

1.3

0.5

0.263

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SES, Socio-economic status
ªmeans ± SD (standard deviation); ᵇ n (%)
* P-value result from ANOVA for quantitative variables and Chi-square test for qualitative variables

Dietary intake across dairy consumption tertiles is presented in Tables 3 and 4. Participants in the high category of milk consumption had higher energy intake, macronutrients, saturated fatty acids (SFA), and several nutrients (vitamin B12, vitamin A, vitamin D,, magnesium, calcium, phosphorus, potassium,, zinc and iron), and people in the upper category of yogurt had higher energy intake, carbohydrates, fats, SFA, vitamin B12, vitamin B6, vitamin D, vitamin A, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, zinc and iron. Higher intake of total energy, carbohydrates, fats, dietary fiber, SFA, vitamin B12, vitamin B6, vitamin D, vitamin E, calcium and potassium were observed in the higher cheese consumption tertile, and higher intakes of energy, protein, dietary fiber, vitamin B6, vitamin A, vitamin K, Vitamin D, potassium, calcium, and magnesium were seen in higher tertile of doogh consumption. Higher tertiles of low-fat dairy intake was correlated with higher energy intake, protein, carbohydrates, dietary fiber, vitamin B12, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin D, vitamin K, calcium, potassium, magnesium, zinc and iron, and higher tertiles of high-fat dairy consumption was correlated with higher energy, fat, dietary fiber, SFA, vitamin D, vitamin E, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, calcium and iron. People in the higher group of total dairy consumption also had higher intakes of energy, protein, dietary fiber, SFA, vitamin B12, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin E, vitamin K, potassium, calcium, zinc, magnesium and iron.

Table 3

Dietary intakes of participants in different tertiles of milk, yogurt, cheese, and doogh consumption among Tehranian women.

 

Tertiles of milk consumption

 

Tertiles of yogurt consumption

 

Tertiles of cheese consumption

 

Tertiles of doogh consumption

 
 

T1 < 40

40 < T2 < 171.42

T3 > 171.42

 

T1 < 67.85

67.85 < T2 < 157.5

T3 > 157.5

 

T1 < 15

15 < T2 < 30

T3 > 30

 

T1 < 20

20 < T2 < 102.8

T3 > 102.8

 

Number

121

123

125

P value*

121

123

125

P value*

121

123

125

P value*

123

121

125

P value*

Energy(g/day)

2348.66 ± 785.02ᵇ

2382.37 ± 783.74

2782.64 ± 620.04

0.0001*

2259.73 ± 656.82

2436.85 ± 785.41

2803.22 ± 722.70

0.0001*

2233.90 ± 827.83

2639.61 ± 470.02

2654.22 ± 768.01

0.0001*

2316.46 ± 490.79

2344.52 ± 779.44

2856.24 ± 683.51

0.0001*

Protein(g/day)

82.20 ± 31.76

85.20 ± 28.64

103.87 ± 25.62

0.001*

80.21 ± 27.42

88.54 ± 30.44

102.01 ± 28.96

0.190

83.04 ± 31.72

93.56 ± 22.05

94.90 ± 31.94

0.347

80.95 ± 27.27

84.17 ± 28.58

106.44 ± 28.56

0.001*

Fat(g/day)

69.87 ± 27.29

76.74 ± 27.33

86.28 ± 28.49

0.011*

66.58 ± 25.38

78.37 ± 26.47

83.31 ± 29.52

0.006*

68.56 ± 30.15

76.82 ± 20.47

85.44 ± 28.72

0.0001*

71.21 ± 24.52

71.34 ± 27.44

90.25 ± 29.25

0.349

Carbohydrate (g/day)

360.95 ± 130.44

350.62 ± 120.36

416.83 ± 97.87

0.017*

348.42 ± 102.32

358.78 ± 127

419.62 ± 117.81

0.012*

334.50 ± 128.59

406.62 ± 74.18

394.07 ± 124.78

0.030*

349.62 ± 116.57

353.65 ± 121.934

425.99 ± 107.21

0.691

Dietary fiber(g/day)

6.12 ± 2.89

6.27 ± 2.61

7.69 ± 2.67

0.051

5.89 ± 2.82

6.95 ± 3.06

7.20 ± 2.39

0.051

6.22 ± 2.94

6.40 ± 1.88

7.24 ± 3.04

0.025*

6.10 ± 2.58

6.09 ± 2.44

7.88 ± 3

0.021*

SFA(mg/day)

20.65 ± 9.44

24.39 ± 8.20

28.70 ± 10.25

0.0001*

20.99 ± 9.01

23.96 ± 8.92

28.54 ± 10.20

0.020*

20.22 ± 9.98

24.09 ± 7.60

28.38 ± 9.46

0.0001*

22.54 ± 9.16

22.42 ± 8.80

28.74 ± 10.34

0.256

VitaminB12(µg/day)

3.20 ± 2.19

3.86 ± 1.47

5.25 ± 1.84

0.0001*

3.02 ± 1.65

4.15 ± 1.94

5.08 ± 1.99

0.0001*

3.88 ± 2.11

3.66 ± 1.61

4.53 ± 2.14

0.0001*

3.59 ± 1.78

3.89 ± 1.82

4.56 ± 2.28

0.111

VitaminB6(µg/day)

1.84 ± 0.84

1.95 ± 0.88

2.16 ± 0.72

0.143

1.72 ± 0.78

2.04 ± 0.83

2.18 ± 0.79

0.010*

1.79 ± 0.85

1.95 ± 0.65

2.17 ± 0.85

0.009*

1.75 ± 0.62

1.82 ± 0.88

2.38 ± 0.81

0.008*

Folate(mg/day)

327.74 ± 178.80

323.23 ± 165.74

384.42 ± 123.53

0.791

294.79 ± 156.34

351.95 ± 156.50

386.67 ± 153.75

0.101

311.01 ± 164.81

339.26 ± 112.06

376.70 ± 171.80

0.054

300.28 ± 112.17

326.09 ± 160.31

411.05 ± 180.23

0.067

VitaminA(RAE/day)

10.06 ± 7.25

11.77 ± 8.37

11.48 ± 5.57

0.011*

9.01 ± 5.33

12.38 ± 8.06

11.83 ± 7.34

0.001*

9.22 ± 6.68

12.71 ± 8.38

11.72 ± 6.48

0.197

9.22 ± 4.92

11.71 ± 9.76

12.52 ± 5.85

0.008*

VitaminE(mg/day)

12.42 ± 6.12

13.05 ± 7.71

13.70 ± 6.78

0.184

11.96 ± 7.85

13.53 ± 6.70

13.63 ± 6

0.059

12.95 ± 7.85

11.93 ± 5.63

13.75 ± 6.65

0.001*

12.46 ± 6.44

11.71 ± 6.39

14.93 ± 7.44

0.456

VitaminD(µg/day)

1.14 ± 1.05

1.50 ± 1.19

2.35 ± 1.71

0.0001*

1.19 ± 1.13

1.65 ± 1.42

2.13 ± 1.58

0.015*

1.28 ± 1.35

1.58 ± 1.21

2.01 ± 1.55

0.014*

1.14 ± 0.96

1.69 ± 1.28

2.20 ± 1.78

0.0001*

VitaminK( µg /day)

140.85 ± 100.03

144.27 ± 85.56

175.93 ± 75.43

0.331

143.36 ± 90.91

154.77 ± 90.34

162.80 ± 84.86

0.554

136.97 ± 93.84

158.12 ± 70.47

165.15 ± 91.93

0.709

151.77 ± 81.58

125.94 ± 71.37

181.56 ± 101.75

0.005*

Calcium(mg/day)

783.44 ± 308.89

957.39 ± 311.32

1379.43 ± 385.09

0.0001*

753.95 ± 267.12

982.79 ± 299.09

1366.29 ± 416.45

0.0001*

856.81 ± 390.09

1059.48 ± 327.75

1174.38 ± 439.79

0.0001*

910.06 ± 368.62

979.61 ± 391.21

1238.57 ± 428.78

0.004*

Magnesium(mg/day)

3.84 ± 1.61

3.52 ± 1.43

4.05 ± 1.40

0.005*

3.44 ± 1.41

3.82 ± 1.42

4.14 ± 1.58

0.370

3.49 ± 1.57

3.81 ± 0.99

4.06 ± 1.62

0.216

3.24 ± 1.08

3.72 ± 1.35

4.49 ± 1.72

0.0001*

Potassium(mg/day)

2982.31 ± 1207.55

3259.44 ± 1138.98

4234.47 ± 1208.72

0.0001*

2945.73 ± 1118.18

3423.13 ± 1251.47

4080.27 ± 1271.41

0.0001*

3181.03 ± 1249.93

3411.53 ± 1001.01

3796.9 ± 1420.31

0.008*

3203.55 ± 1242.95

3129.38 ± 1212.17

4142.78 ± 1201.16

0.002*

Phosphorus(mg/day)

1153.37 ± 480.24

1274.94 ± 430.20

1678.91 ± 429.11

0.0001*

1102.45 ± 454.32

1314.85 ± 396.36

1674.43 ± 468.75

0.0001*

1222.97 ± 516.33

1420.76 ± 396.05

1463.31 ± 513.17

0.672

1229.26 ± 425.31

1292.71 ± 495.84

1592.61 ± 505.17

0.079

Zinc(mg/day)

8.70 ± 3.78

9.66 ± 3.32

11.99 ± 3.69

0.0001*

8.34 ± 3.29

9.96 ± 3.40

11.95 ± 3.95

0.0001*

9.21 ± 3.51

10.01 ± 3.26

10.92 ± 4.24

0.064

9.29 ± 3.49

9.67 ± 3.60

11.62 ± 14.03

0.410

Iron(mg/day)

18.6 ± 7.12

18.34 ± 7.20

20.04 ± 4.53

0.0001*

17.89 ± 6.59

19.21 ± 7.16

19.87 ± 5.31

0.0001*

17.61 ± 7.18

20.89 ± 4.40

19.13 ± 6.45

0.0001

17.45 ± 5.54

17.66 ± 6.65

21.91 ± 6.10

0.451

Abbreviations: SFA, Saturated Fatty Acid
ªmeans ± SE (standard error)
* p-value result from the analysis of covariance test (ANCOVA) adjusted for energy

Table 4

Dietary intakes of participants in different tertiles of low Fat dairy, high Fat dairy, and total dairy consumption among Tehranian women.

 

Tertiles of low fat dairy consumption

 

Tertiles of high fat dairy consumption

 

Tertiles of total dairy consumption

 
 

T1 < 227.49

227.49 < T2 < 362.34

T3 > 362.34

 

T1 < 15.10

15.10 < T2 < 68.71

T3 > 68.71

 

T1 < 280.6

280.6 < T2 < 446.07

T3 > 446.07

 

Number

121

123

125

P value*

121

123

125

P value*

121

123

125

P value*

Energy(g/day)

2240.58 ± 740.26ᵃ

2374.53 ± 729.070

2904.67 ± 632.50

0.0001*

2263.82 ± 666.85

2427.45 ± 720.17

2828.95 ± 771.45

0.0001*

2078.53 ± 653.01

2622.84 ± 747.92

2847.52 ± 653.03

0.0001*

Protein(g/day)

75.23 ± 26.80

91.22 ± 29.74

105.13 ± 26.66

0.0001*

84.31 ± 27.67

85.16 ± 26.70

102.08 ± 32.91

0.075

71.34 ± 24.41

98.26 ± 27.79

103.49 ± 28.03

0.0001*

Fat(g/day)

68.37 ± 25.63

74.76 ± 27.29

89.84 ± 28.22

0.494

67.11 ± 24.89

75.54 ± 26.03

90.33 ± 29.45

0.016*

63.05 ± 22.87

80.77 ± 27.52

90.05 ± 27.97

0.314

Carbohydrate (g/day)

342.22 ± 120.75

348.41 ± 115.63

438.91 ± 98.61

0.022*

344.73 ± 112.14

364.54 ± 116.08

420.40 ± 120.10

0.269

316.49 ± 108.98

393.22 ± 121.55

424.02 ± 103.72

0.361

Dietary fiber(g/day)

5.32 ± 2.27

6.91 ± 2.87

7.87 ± 2.68

0.0001*

6.48 ± 2.75

6.61 ± 3.13

7 ± 2.53

0.041*

5.13 ± 2.12

7.39 ± 2.87

7.70 ± 2.70

0.0001*

SFA(mg/day)

21.26 ± 9.43

23.40 ± 2.87

29.10 ± 9.82

0.233

20.15 ± 8.73

23.56 ± 8.36

30.05 ± 9.90

0.0001*

19.73 ± 8.66

24.19 ± 8.23

30 ± 9.74

0.0001*

VitaminB12(µg/day)

2.86 ± 1.65

4.34 ± 1.85

5.13 ± 1.97

0.0001*

3.68 ± 2

3.61 ± 6.49

5.04 ± 2.26

0.001*

2.85 ± 1.52

4.33 ± 1.89

5.22 ± 1.96

0.0001*

VitaminB6(µg/day)

1.67 ± 0.72

1.93 ± 0.74

2.37 ± 0.84

0.016*

1.87 ± 0.81

1.93 ± 0.79

2.16 ± 0.84

0.007*

1.51 ± 0.61

2.19 ± 0.84

2.30 ± 0.77

0.001*

Folate(mg/day)

273.56 ± 121.72

356.15 ± 164.14

406.98 ± 116.20

0.0001*

328.57 ± 147.89

327.14 ± 165.28

380.73 ± 160.70

0.059

256.49 ± 110.06

385.80 ± 173.29

401.67 ± 150.80

0.001*

VitaminA(RAE/day)

9.89 ± 7.08

10.44 ± 7.25

12.95 ± 6.81

0.960

10.15 ± 7.36

10.63 ± 5.72

12.50 ± 8.01

0.832

8.18 ± 5.23

12.98 ± 8.04

12.42 ± 6.70

0.015*

VitaminE(mg/day)

11.85 ± 6.20

12.93 ± 7.92

14.38 ± 6.24

0.260

11.64 ± 7.70

14.01 ± 6.59

13.53 ± 6.12

0.003*

10.45 ± 6.16

14.98 ± 7.49

14.03 ± 6.26

0.010*

Vitamin D(µg/day)

1.06 ± 0.90

1.58 ± 0.99

2.35 ± 1.90

0.0001*

1.59 ± 1.53

1.27 ± 1.15

2.13 ± 1.49

0.002*

1.08 ± 0.87

1.58 ± 1.30

2.35 ± 1.74

0.0001*

Vitamin K( µg /day)

117.17 ± 65.47

173.23 ± 105.07

171.37 ± 80.21

0.0001*

148.52 ± 78.90

152.71 ± 95.37

160.38 ± 91.60

0.215

119.01 ± 71.81

170.37 ± 99.61

175.19 ± 83.79

0.028*

Calcium(mg/day)

720.34 ± 278.02

970.22 ± 229.44

1435.20 ± 370.68

0.0001*

954.30 ± 385.84

957.16 ± 357.47

1214.20 ± 460.18

0.026*

706.04 ± 244.09

1013.77 ± 239.23

1417.17 ± 386.17

0.0001*

Magnesium(mg/day)

3.25 ± 1.31

3.90 ± 1.49

4.27 ± 1.51

0.002*

3.63 ± 1.25

3.56 ± 1.24

4.24 ± 1.83

0.095

3.03 ± 1.08

4.23 ± 1.50

4.25 ± 1.56

0.004*

Potassium(mg/day)

2678.69 ± 972.78

3419.19 ± 1125.94

4393.13 ± 1181.88

0.0001*

3317.48 ± 1227.34

3371.57 ± 1312.55

3801.56 ± 1316.98

0.096

2579.90 ± 880.50

3648.15 ± 1050.48

4314.36 ± 1276.82

0.0001*

Phosphorus(mg/day)

1054.04 ± 394.26

1339.02 ± 426.89

1720.21 ± 437.61

0.0001*

1264 ± 450.64

1288.12 ± 460.88

1560.74 ± 533.36

0.184

1014.73 ± 352.39

1411.84 ± 408.91

1704.98 ± 462.19

0.0001*

Zinc(mg/day)

7.99 ± 2.91

10.21 ± 3.69

12.18 ± 3.73

0.0001*

9.40 ± 3.76

9.65 ± 3.37

11.33 ± 4.14

0.620

7.73 ± 2.72

10.56 ± 3.48

12.23 ± 3.84

0.0001*

Iron(mg/day)

17.37 ± 6.87

18.73 ± 6.66

20.95 ± 5.09

0.0001*

17.78 ± 5.63

18.45 ± 6.51

20.81 ± 6.70

0.002

15.85 ± 5.99

21.22 ± 6.97

20.32 ± 4.87

0.0001*

Abbreviations: SFA, Saturated Fatty Acid
ªmeans ± SE (standard error)
* p-value result from the analysis of covariance test (ANCOVA) adjusted for energy

The means and standard deviation (SD) of FRS and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease across dairy consumption tertiles are depicted in Tables 5 and 6. Participants in the highest milk consumption category compared to those in the lowest category had the lowest HDL-C (47.83 ± 0.68 vs. 48.01 ± 0.67 P < 0.001), and the highest TAG (111.8 ± 4.79 vs. 103.1 ± 4.69; p = 0.6), LDL-C (83.34 ± 1.46 vs. 77.07 ± 1.43; <0.001 p), TC / HDL-C (3.92 ± 0.08 vs. 3.82 ± 0.08; P = 0.002), and FBS (90.94 ± 0.74 vs. 87.07 ± 0.72; p = 0.001). HDL-C also decreased significantly across tertiles of yogurt, cheese, doogh, total dairy, high-fat dairy, and low-fat dairy intake (47.83 ± 0.68 vs. 48.01 ± 0.67; p < 0.001), but LDL (83.34 ± 1.46 vs. 77.07 ± 1.43; p < 0.001), TC / HDL-C (3.92 ± 0.08 vs. 3.82 ± 0.08; p = 0.002) and FBS (90.94 ± 0.74 vs. 87.07 ± 0.72; 001 / 0 = p) increased.

Table 5

Distribution of Framingham score and its Components among tertiles of milk, yogurt, cheese, and doogh consumption among Tehranin women.

   

Tertiles of milk consumption

 

Tertiles of yogurt consumption

 

Tertile of cheese consumption

 

Tertiles of doogh consumption

 
   

T1 < 40

40 < T2 < 171.42

T3 > 171.42

 

T1 < 67.85

67.85 < T2 < 157.5

T3 > 157.5

 

T1 < 15

15 < T2 < 30

T3 > 30

 

T1 < 20

20 < T2 < 102.8

T3 > 102.8

 

Number

 

121

123

125

 

121

123

125

 

121

123

125

 

121

123

125

 

CVD risk factors

       

P value*

     

P value*

     

P value*

     

P value*

Framingham score

Crudeᵃ

                               

Model 1ᵇ

-1.63 ± 4.34

-1.64 ± 4.84

-0.07 ± 5.10

0.01

-1.17 ± 5.01

-1.66 ± 4.83

-0.49 ± 4.55

0.16

-1.85 ± 4.38

-0.50 ± 5.26

-1.10 ± 4.54

0.06

-1.09 ± 4.33

-1.53 ± 4.68

-0.76 ± 5.40

0.47

Model 2ʰ

-1.06 ± 0.29

-2.04 ± 0.30

-0.26 ± 0.30

< 0.001

-1.06 ± 0.29

-2.04 ± 0.30

-0.26 ± 0.30

< 0.001

-1.06 ± 0.29

-2.04 ± 0.30

-0.26 ± 0.30

< 0.001

-1.06 ± 0.29

-2.04 ± 0.3

-0.26 ± 0.3

< 0.001

TAG(mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

-1.00 ± 0.29

-2.06 ± 0.29

-0.29 ± 0.29

< 0.001

-1.00 ± 0.29

-2.06 ± 0.29

-0.29 ± 0.29

< 0.001

-1.00 ± 0.29

-2.06 ± 0.29

-0.29 ± 0.29

< 0.001

-1.00 ± 0.29

-2.06 ± 0.29

-0.29 ± 0.29

< 0.001

Model 1ᵇ

100.1 ± 49.22

98.73 ± 47.64

111.2 ± 68.4

0.15

100.1 ± 49.22

98.73 ± 47.64

111.2 ± 68.4

0.15

100.1 ± 49.22

98.73 ± 47.64

111.2 ± 68.4

0.15

100.1 ± 49.22

98.73 ± 47.64

111.2 ± 68.4

0.15

Model 2ʰ

102.6 ± 4.72

95.89 ± 4.79

112.1 ± 4.82

0.06

102.6 ± 4.72

95.89 ± 4.79

112.1 ± 4.82

0.06

102.6 ± 4.72

95.89 ± 4.79

112.1 ± 4.82

0.06

102.6 ± 4.72

95.89 ± 4.79

112.1 ± 4.82

0.06

TC(mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

103.1 ± 4.69

95.69 ± 4.75

111.8 ± 4.79

0.06

103.1 ± 4.69

95.69 ± 4.75

111.8 ± 4.79

0.06

103.1 ± 4.69

95.69 ± 4.75

111.8 ± 4.79

0.06

103.1 ± 4.69

95.69 ± 4.75

111.8 ± 4.79

0.06

Model 1ᵇ

174.3 ± 31.56

177.3 ± 30.46

181.7 ± 31.4

0.17

174.3 ± 31.5

177.3 ± 30.46

181.7 ± 31.4

0.17

174.3 ± 31.56

177.3 ± 30.46

181.7 ± 31.4

0.17

174.3 ± 31.56

177.3 ± 30.46

181.7 ± 31.4

0.17

Model 2ʰ

175.8 ± 2.62

174.04 ± 2.65

183.1 ± 2.67

0.04

175.8 ± 2.62

174.04 ± 2.65

183.1 ± 2.67

0.04

175.8 ± 2.62

174.04 ± 2.65

183.1 ± 2.67

0.04

175.8 ± 2.62

174.04 ± 2.65

183.1 ± 2.67

0.04

HDL-C(mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

176.2 ± 2.57

173.8 ± 2.6

182.9 ± 2.62

0.05

176.2 ± 2.57

173.8 ± 2.6

182.9 ± 2.62

0.05

176.2 ± 2.57

173.8 ± 2.60

182.9 ± 2.62

0.05

176.2 ± 2.57

173.8 ± 2.6

182.9 ± 2.62

0.05

Model 1ᵇ

48.26 ± 8.42

51.35 ± 8.93

47.68 ± 6.75

0.001

48.26 ± 8.42

51.35 ± 8.93

47.68 ± 6.75

0.001

48.26 ± 8.42

51.35 ± 8.93

47.68 ± 6.75

0.001

48.26 ± 8.42

51.35 ± 8.93

47.68 ± 6.75

0.001

Model 2ʰ

48.17 ± 0.71

51.48 ± 0.72

47.74 ± 0.72

< 0.001

48.17 ± 0.71

51.48 ± 0.72

47.74 ± 0.72

< 0.001

48.17 ± 0.71

51.48 ± 0.72

47.74 ± 0.72

< 0.001

48.17 ± 0.71

51.48 ± 0.72

47.74 ± 0.72

< 0.001

LDL-C(mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

48.01 ± 0.67

51.55 ± 0.68

47.83 ± 0.68

< 0.001

48.01 ± 0.67

51.55 ± 0.68

47.83 ± 0.68

< 0.001

48.01 ± 0.67

51.55 ± 0.68

47.83 ± 0.68

< 0.001

48.01 ± 0.67

51.55 ± 0.68

47.83 ± 0.68

< 0.001

Model 1ᵇ

75.65 ± 15.4

83.8 ± 16.6

85.55 ± 19.41

< 0.001

75.65 ± 15.4

83.8 ± 16.6

85.55 ± 19.41

< 0.001

75.65 ± 15.4

83.8 ± 16.6

85.55 ± 19.41

< 0.001

75.65 ± 15.4

83.8 ± 16.6

85.55 ± 19.41

< 0.001

Model 2ʰ

77.24 ± 1.44

84.76 ± 1.46

83.24 ± 1.47

0.001

77.24 ± 1.44

84.76 ± 1.46

83.24 ± 1.47

0.001

77.24 ± 1.44

84.76 ± 1.46

83.24 ± 1.47

0.001

77.24 ± 1.44

84.76 ± 1.46

83.24 ± 1.47

0.001

TAG/HDL-C

Crudeᵃ

77.07 ± 1.43

84.83 ± 1.45

83.34 ± 1.46

< 0.001

77.07 ± 1.43

84.83 ± 1.45

83.34 ± 1.46

< 0.001

77.07 ± 1.43

84.83 ± 1.45

83.34 ± 1.46

< 0.001

77.07 ± 1.43

84.83 ± 1.45

83.34 ± 1.46

< 0.001

Model 1ᵇ

2.19 ± 1.36

2.07 ± 1.35

2.38 ± 1.49

0.22

2.19 ± 1.36

2.07 ± 1.35

2.38 ± 1.49

0.22

2.19 ± 1.36

2.07 ± 1.35

2.38 ± 1.49

0.22

2.19 ± 1.36

2.07 ± 1.35

2.38 ± 1.49

0.22

Model 2ʰ

2.24 ± 0.11

2.01 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.08

2.24 ± 0.11

2.01 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.08

2.24 ± 0.11

2.01 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.08

2.24 ± 0.11

2.01 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.08

TC/HDL-C

Crudeᵃ

2.25 ± 0.11

2.00 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.07

2.25 ± 0.11

2.00 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.07

2.25 ± 0.11

2.007 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.07

2.25 ± 0.11

2.00 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.07

Model 1ᵇ

3.76 ± 1.15

3.59 ± 1.07

3.89 ± 0.94

0.08

3.76 ± 1.15

3.59 ± 1.07

3.89 ± 0.94

0.08

3.76 ± 1.15

3.59 ± 1.07

3.89 ± 0.94

0.08

3.76 ± 1.15

3.59 ± 1.07

3.89 ± 0.94

0.08

Model 2ʰ

3.8 ± 0.09

3.51 ± 0.09

3.93 ± 0.09

0.005

3.8 ± 0.09

3.51 ± 0.09

3.93 ± 0.09

0.005

3.80 ± 0.09

3.51 ± 0.09

3.93 ± 0.09

0.005

3.8 ± 0.09

3.51 ± 0.09

3.93 ± 0.09

0.005

FBS (mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

3.82 ± 0.08

3.5 ± 0.08

3.92 ± 0.08

0.002

3.82 ± 0.08

3.5 ± 0.08

3.92 ± 0.08

0.002

3.82 ± 0.08

3.50 ± 0.08

3.92 ± 0.08

0.002

3.82 ± 0.08

3.5 ± 0.08

3.92 ± 0.08

0.002

Model 1ᵇ

86.3 ± 7.72

88.8 ± 9.25

91.1 ± 10.42

< 0.001

86.34 ± 7.72

88.86 ± 9.25

91.16 ± 10.42

< 0.001

86.34 ± 7.72

88.86 ± 9.25

91.16 ± 10.42

< 0.001

86.34 ± 7.72

88.86 ± 9.25

91.16 ± 10.42

< 0.001

Model 2ʰ

87.17 ± 0.72

88.43 ± 0.73

90.86 ± 0.73

0.002

87.07 ± 0.72

88.44 ± 0.73

90.94 ± 0.74

0.001

87.07 ± 0.72

88.44 ± 0.73

90.94 ± 0.74

0.001

87.07 ± 0.72

88.44 ± 0.73

90.94 ± 0.74

0.001

Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular diseases; TAG, Triacylglycerol; TC, Total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar
ªmeans ± SD (standard deviation)
ᵇ model 1 is mean ± standard error, adjust for age, sex, body mass index, energy intake, socio-economic status, smoking, drug intake (diabetes, cardiovascular, BP, high blood lipid, antioxidants, multivitamin, omega 3)
ʰ model 1 is mean ± standard error, adjust for model 1 + physical activity
*P-value result from ANOVA test for crude model, and the analysis of covariance test (ANCOVA) for adjusted models

Table 6

Distribution of Framingham score and its Components among tertiles of low Fat dairy, high Fat dairy, and total dairy consumption among Tehranin women.

   

Tertiles of low fat dairy consumption

 

Tertiles of high fat dairy consumption

 

Tertiles of total dairy consumption

 
   

T1 < 227.49

227.49 < T2 < 362.34

T3 > 362.34

 

T1 < 15.10

15.10 < T2 < 68.71

T3 > 68.71

 

T1 < 280.6

280.6 < T2 < 446.07

T3 > 446.07

 

Number

 

121

123

125

 

121

123

125

 

121

123

125

 
         

P value*

     

P value*

     

P value*

Framingham score

Crudeᵃ

-1.34 ± 5.17

-1.52 ± 5.16

-0.49 ± 4.02

0.20

-0.08 ± 5.64

-1.39 ± 4.42

-1.87 ± 4.11

0.01

-1.43 ± 4.51

-1.24 ± 4.86

-0.67 ± 5.07

0.43

Model 1ᵇ

-1.06 ± 0.29

-2.04 ± 0.3

-0.26 ± 0.3

< 0.001

-1.06 ± 0.29

-2.04 ± 0.30

-0.26 ± 0.30

< 0.001

-1.06 ± 0.29

-2.04 ± 0.30

-0.26 ± 0.30

< 0.001

Model 2ʰ

-1.00 ± 0.29

-2.06 ± 0.29

-0.29 ± 0.29

< 0.001

-1.00 ± 0.29

-2.06 ± 0.29

-0.29 ± 0.29

< 0.001

-1.00 ± 0.29

-2.06 ± 0.29

-0.29 ± 0.29

< 0.001

TAG(mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

100.1 ± 49.22

98.73 ± 47.64

111.2 ± 68.4

0.15

100.1 ± 49.22

98.73 ± 47.64

111.2 ± 68.4

0.15

100.1 ± 49.22

98.73 ± 47.64

111.2 ± 68.4

0.15

Model 1ᵇ

102.6 ± 4.72

95.89 ± 4.79

112.1 ± 4.82

0.06

102.6 ± 4.72

95.89 ± 4.79

112.1 ± 4.82

0.06

102.6 ± 4.72

95.89 ± 4.79

112.1 ± 4.82

0.06

Model 2ʰ

103.1 ± 4.69

95.69 ± 4.75

111.8 ± 4.79

0.06

103.1 ± 4.69

95.69 ± 4.75

111.8 ± 4.79

0.06

103.1 ± 4.69

95.69 ± 4.75

111.8 ± 4.79

0.06

TC(mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

174.3 ± 31.56

177.3 ± 30.46

181.7 ± 31.4

0.17

174.3 ± 31.56

177.3 ± 30.46

181.7 ± 31.4

0.17

174.3 ± 31.56

177.3 ± 30.46

181.7 ± 31.4

0.17

Model 1ᵇ

175.8 ± 2.62

174.04 ± 2.65

183.1 ± 2.67

0.04

175.8 ± 2.62

174.04 ± 2.65

183.1 ± 2.67

0.04

175.8 ± 2.62

174.04 ± 2.65

183.1 ± 2.67

0.04

Model 2ʰ

176.2 ± 2.57

173.8 ± 2.6

182.9 ± 2.62

0.05

176.2 ± 2.57

173.8 ± 2.6

182.9 ± 2.62

0.05

176.2 ± 2.57

173.8 ± 2.60

182.9 ± 2.62

0.04

HDL-C(mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

48.26 ± 8.42

51.35 ± 8.93

47.68 ± 6.75

0.001

48.26 ± 8.42

51.35 ± 8.93

47.68 ± 6.75

0.001

48.26 ± 8.42

51.35 ± 8.93

47.68 ± 6.75

0.001

Model 1ᵇ

48.17 ± 0.71

51.48 ± 0.72

47.74 ± 0.72

< 0.001

48.17 ± 0.71

51.48 ± 0.72

47.74 ± 0.72

< 0.001

48.17 ± 0.71

51.48 ± 0.72

47.74 ± 0.72

< 0.001

Model 2ʰ

48.01 ± 0.67

51.55 ± 0.68

47.83 ± 0.68

< 0.001

48.01 ± 0.67

51.55 ± 0.68

47.83 ± 0.68

< 0.001

48.01 ± 0.67

51.55 ± 0.68

47.83 ± 0.68

< 0.001

LDL-C(mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

75.65 ± 15.4

83.8 ± 16.6

85.55 ± 19.41

< 0.001

75.65 ± 15.4

83.8 ± 16.6

85.55 ± 19.41

< 0.001

75.65 ± 15.4

83.80 ± 16.60

85.55 ± 19.41

< 0.001

Model 1ᵇ

77.24 ± 1.44

84.76 ± 1.46

83.24 ± 1.47

0.001

77.24 ± 1.44

84.76 ± 1.46

83.24 ± 1.47

0.001

77.24 ± 1.44

84.76 ± 1.46

83.24 ± 1.47

0.001

Model 2ʰ

77.07 ± 1.43

84.83 ± 1.45

83.34 ± 1.46

< 0.001

77.07 ± 1.43

84.83 ± 1.45

83.34 ± 1.46

< 0.001

77.07 ± 1.43

84.83 ± 1.45

83.34 ± 1.46

< 0.001

TAG/HDL-C

Crudeᵃ

2.19 ± 1.36

2.07 ± 1.35

2.38 ± 1.49

0.22

2.19 ± 1.36

2.07 ± 1.35

2.38 ± 1.49

0.22

2.19 ± 1.36

2.07 ± 1.35

2.38 ± 1.49

0.22

Model 1ᵇ

2.24 ± 0.11

2.01 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.08

2.24 ± 0.11

2.01 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.08

2.24 ± 0.11

2.01 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.08

Model 2ʰ

2.25 ± 0.11

2.00 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.07

2.25 ± 0.11

2.00 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.07

2.25 ± 0.11

2.00 ± 0.11

2.39 ± 0.11

0.07

TC/HDL-C

Crudeᵃ

3.76 ± 1.15

3.59 ± 1.07

3.89 ± 0.94

0.08

3.76 ± 1.15

3.59 ± 1.07

3.89 ± 0.94

0.08

3.76 ± 1.15

3.59 ± 1.07

3.89 ± 0.94

0.08

Model 1ᵇ

3.8 ± 0.09

3.51 ± 0.09

3.93 ± 0.09

0.005

3.8 ± 0.09

3.51 ± 0.09

3.93 ± 0.09

0.005

3.80 ± 0.09

3.51 ± 0.09

3.93 ± 0.09

0.005

Model 2ʰ

3.82 ± 0.08

3.5 ± 0.08

3.92 ± 0.08

0.002

3.82 ± 0.08

3.50 ± 0.08

3.92 ± 0.08

0.002

3.82 ± 0.08

3.50 ± 0.08

3.92 ± 0.08

0.003

FBS (mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

86.34 ± 7.72

88.86 ± 9.25

91.16 ± 10.42

< 0.001

86.34 ± 7.72

88.86 ± 9.25

91.16 ± 10.42

< 0.001

86.34 ± 7.72

88.86 ± 9.25

91.16 ± 10.42

< 0.001

Model 1ᵇ

87.07 ± 0.72

88.44 ± 0.73

90.94 ± 0.74

0.001

87.07 ± 0.72

88.44 ± 0.73

90.94 ± 0.74

0.001

87.07 ± 0.72

88.44 ± 0.73

90.94 ± 0.74

0.001

Model 2ʰ

87.07 ± 0.72

88.44 ± 0.73

90.94 ± 0.74

0.001

87.07 ± 0.72

88.44 ± 0.73

90.94 ± 0.74

0.001

87.07 ± 0.72

88.44 ± 0.73

90.94 ± 0.74

0.002

Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular diseases; TAG, Triacylglycerol; TC, Total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar
ªmeans ± SD (standard deviation)
ᵇ model 1 is mean ± standard error, adjust for age, sex, body mass index, energy intake, socio-economic status, smoking, drug intake (diabetes, cardiovascular, BP, high blood lipid, antioxidants, multivitamin, omega 3)
ʰ model 1 is mean ± standard error, adjust for model 1 + physical activity
*P-value result from ANOVA test for crude model, and the analysis of covariance test (ANCOVA) for adjusted models

The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of cardiovascular risk factors, in the crude and modified models across total dairy consumption and each of its types, are shown in Tables 79. Subjects with a greater intake of high-fat dairy had higher serum TG levels (OR: 4.47, 95% CI: 1.75, 11.43; P = 0.999), but no association was observed between high consumption of high fat dairy and LDL-C, TC and HDL (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.01, 3.2; P = 0.999, OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.11, 4.84; P = 0.999 and OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.19, 10.08; P = 0.366, respectively). Participants with the highest tertile of milk, yogurt, cheese, doogh, low-fat dairy, and total dairy consumption compared to those in the lowest tertile, did not show a significant link with lower serum levels of TG (OR: 0.05, 95% CI : 0.003, 1.09; P = 0.999), LDL-C (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.01, 3.2; P = 0.999), TC (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.11, 4.84; P = 0.999), and higher serum levels of HDL-C (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.19, 10.08; P = 0.366).

Table 7

Associations of milk, yogurt, and cheese consumption with Framingham risk score and CVD Risk Factors among Tehranian women.

   

Tertiles of milk consumption

 

Tertiles of yogurt consumption

 

Tertile of cheese consumption

 
   

T1 < 40

40 < T2 < 171.42

T3 > 171.42

 

T1 < 67.85

67.85 < T2 < 157.5

T3 > 157.5

 

T1 < 15

15 < T2 < 30

T3 > 30

 

number

 

121

123

125

 

121

123

125

 

121

123

125

 

CVD risk factors

Model

 

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

P trend

 

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

P trend

 

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

P trend

FBS

Crudeᵃ

reference

0.5 (0.18,1.42)

1.5 (0.67,3.4)

< 0.001

reference

2.27 (0.82,6.27)

2.87 (1.07,7.66)

< 0.001

reference

0.14 (0.04,0.46)

0.4 (0.18,0.88)

< 0.001

Adjustedᵇ

reference

0.7 (0.12,4.02)

4.36 (0.77,24.71)

0.999

reference

1.69 (0.35,8.17)

2.95 (0.59,14.61)

0.999

reference

0.2 (0.02,2.06)

0.35 (0.07,1.62)

0.999

TAG(≥ 150 mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

reference

0.47 (0.19, 1.15)

1.56 (0.78, 3.13)

< 0.001

reference

0.87 (0.42, 1.8)

0.71 (0.33, 1.53)

< 0.001

reference

0.73 (0.36, 1.47)

0.74 (0.33, 1.64)

< 0.001

Adjustedᵇ

reference

0.25 (0.04, 1.38)

0.05 (0.003, 1.09)

0.999

reference

0.25 (0.04, 1.38)

0.05 (0.003, 1.09)

0.999

reference

0.25 (0.04, 1.38)

0.05 (0.003, 1.09)

0.999

TC

Crudeᵃ

reference

1.25 (0.66, 2.36)

1.31 (0.7, 2.46)

< 0.001

reference

0.46 (0.23, 0.9)

0.99 (0.55, 1.79)

< 0.001

reference

1.41 (0.77, 2.56)

1.19 (0.6, 2.35)

< 0.001

Adjustedᵇ

reference

0.81 (0.25, 2.61)

0.74 (0.11, 4.84)

0.999

reference

0.81 (0.25, 2.61)

0.74 (0.11, 4.84)

0.999

reference

0.81 (0.25, 2.61)

0.74 (0.11, 4.84)

0.999

HDL-C (˂40 mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

reference

2.05 (0.99, 4.24)

2.08 (1.00, 4.32)

0.659

reference

2.05 (0.99, 4.24)

2.08 (1.00, 4.32)

0.381

reference

2.05 (0.99, 4.24)

2.08 (1.00, 4.32)

0.11

Adjustedᵇ

reference

2.39 (0.63, 8.99)

1.39 (0.19, 10.08)

0.366

reference

2.39 (0.63, 8.99)

1.39 (0.19, 10.08)

0.157

reference

2.39 (0.63, 8.99)

1.39 (0.19, 10.08)

0.350

LDL-C  (> 100 mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

reference

2.09 (0.96,4.56)

1.93 (0.88,4.24)

< 0.001

reference

2.09 (0.96, 4.56)

1.93 (0.88, 4.24)

0.002

reference

2.09 (0.96, 4.56)

1.93 (0.88, 4.24)

< 0.001

Adjustedᵇ

reference

1.34 (0.25, 7.24)

0.19 (0.01, 3.2)

0.999

reference

1.34 (0.25, 7.24)

0.19 (0.01, 3.2)

0.999

reference

1.34 (0.25, 7.24)

0.19 (0.01, 3.2)

0.999

Abbreviations: OR, odd ratios; CI, confidence intervals; TAG, Triacylglycerol; TC, Total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein;
ªmeans ± SD (standard deviation)
ᵇ mean ± SE (standard error) adjusted for age, dietary fiber, socio-economic status, smoking, diseases, and drugs (anti-diabetic, multivitamin and antioxidant supplements
* P values were calculated using logistic regression
** P values resulted from ordinal regression

Table 8

Associations of doogh and total dairy consumption with Framingham risk score and CVD Risk Factors among tehranian women.

   

Tertiles of doogh consumption

Tertiles of total dairy consumption

   

T1 < 20

20 < T2 < 102.8

T3 > 102.8

 

T1 < 280.6

280.6 < T2 < 446.07

T3 > 446.07

 

number

 

121

123

125

 

121

123

125

 

CVD risk factors

Model

 

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

P trend

 

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

P trend

FBS

Crudeᵃ

reference

0.86 (0.31,2.37)

2.12 (0.88,5.13)

< 0.001

reference

0.84 (0.34,2.02)

0.94 (0.39,2.22)

< 0.001

Adjustedᵇ

reference

0.22 (0.02,2.13)

14.11 (1.97,101.03)

0.999

reference

0.71 (0.10,4.75)

2.53 (0.49,13.03)

0.999

TAG(≥ 150 mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

reference

0.63 (0.25, 1.57)

2.1 (1.04, 4.27)

< 0.001

reference

1.48 (0.65, 3.33)

1.99 (0.91, 4.36)

< 0.001

Adjusted

reference

0.25 (0.04, 1.38)

0.05 (0.003, 1.09)

0.999

reference

0.25 (0.04, 1.38)

0.05 (0.003, 1.09)

0.999

TC

Crude

reference

1.19 (0.61, 2.32)

1.89 (1.02, 3.5)

< 0.001

reference

1.9 (1.00, 3.62)

1.58 (0.81, 3.06)

<0.001

Adjusted

reference

0.81 (0.25, 2.61)

0.74 (0.11, 4.84)

0.999

reference

0.81 (0.25, 2.61)

0.74 (0.11, 4.84)

0.999

HDL-C (˂40 mg/dl)

Crude

reference

2.05 (0.99, 4.24)

2.08 (1.00, 4.32)

0.224

reference

2.05 (0.99, 4.24)

2.08 (1.00, 4.32)

0.320

Adjusted

reference

2.39 (0.63, 8.99)

1.39 (0.19, 10.08)

0.302

reference

2.39 (0.63, 8.99)

1.39 (0.19, 10.08)

0.334

LDL-C  (> 100 mg/dl)

Crude

reference

2.09 (0.96, 4.56)

1.93 (0.88, 4.24)

0.044

reference

2.09 (0.96, 4.56)

1.93 (0.88, 4.24)

<0.001

Adjusted

reference

1.34 (0.25, 7.24)

0.19 (0.01, 3.2)

0.999

reference

1.34 (0.25, 7.24)

0.19 (0.01, 3.2)

0.999

Abbreviations: OR, odd ratios; CI, confidence intervals; TAG, Triacylglycerol; TC, Total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein;
ªmeans ± SD (standard deviation)
ᵇ mean ± SE (standard error) adjusted for age, dietary fiber, socio-economic status, smoking, diseases, and drugs (anti-diabetic, multivitamin and antioxidant supplements
* P values were calculated using logistic regression
** P values resulted from ordinal regression

Table 9

Associations of low fat dairy and high fat dairy consumption with Framingham risk score and CVD Risk Factors among tehranian women.

   

Tertiles of low fat dairy consumption

Tertiles of high fat dairy consumption

   

T1 < 227.49

227.49 < T2 < 362.34

T3 > 362.34

 

T1 < 15.10

15.10 < T2 < 68.71

T3 > 68.71

 

number

 

121

123

125

 

121

123

125

 

CVD risk factors

Model

 

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

P trend

 

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

P trend

FBS

Crudeᵃ

reference

0.45 (0.16,1.25)

1.18 (0.53,2.64)

< 0.001

reference

2.32 (0.91,5.91)

1.62 (0.6,4.34)

0.001

Adjustedᵇ

reference

0.28 (0.04,1.99)

2.4 (0.4,14.1)

0.999

reference

1.86 (0.32,10.58)

0.97 (0.16,5.84)

0.999

TAG(≥ 150 mg/dl)

Crudeᵃ

reference

0.29 (0.13,0.64)

0.28 (0.13,0.62)

< 0.001

reference

3.37 (1.29,8.81)

4.47 (1.75,11.43)

0.006

Adjusted

reference

0.25 (0.04, 1.38)

0.05 (0.003, 1.09)

0.999

reference

3.37 (1.29, 8.81)

4.47 (1.75, 11.43)

0.999

TC

Crude

reference

0.75 (0.31, 1.43)

0.66 (0.21, 3.52)

< 0.001

reference

1.38 (0.75, 2.55)

0.93 (0.49, 1.79)

<0.001

Adjusted

reference

0.81 (0.25, 2.61)

0.74 (0.11, 4.84)

0.999

reference

0.81 (0.25, 2.61)

0.74 (0.11, 4.84)

0.999

HDL-C (˂40 mg/dl)

Crude

reference

2.05 (0.99, 4.24)

2.08 (1.00, 4.32)

0.390

reference

2.05 (0.99, 4.24)

2.08 (1.00, 4.32)

0.118

Adjusted

reference

2.39 (0.63, 8.99)

1.39 (0.19, 10.08)

0.240

reference

2.39 (0.63, 8.99)

1.39 (0.19, 10.08)

0.299

LDL-C  (> 100 mg/dl)

Crude

reference

2.09 (0.96, 4.56)

1.93 (0.88, 4.24)

< 0.001

reference

2.09 (0.96, 4.56)

1.93 (0.88, 4.24)

0.010

Adjusted

reference

1.34 (0.25, 7.24)

0.19 (0.01, 3.2)

0.999

reference

1.34 (0.25, 7.24)

0.19 (0.01, 3.2)

0.999

Abbreviations: OR, odd ratios; CI, confidence intervals; TAG, Triacylglycerol; TC, Total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein;
ªmeans ± SD (standard deviation)
ᵇ mean ± SE (standard error) adjusted for age, dietary fiber, socio-economic status, smoking, diseases, and drugs (anti-diabetic, multivitamin and antioxidant supplements
* P values were calculated using logistic regression
** P values resulted from ordinal regression

Discussion

The present cross-sectional study indicated that women who consumed high amounts of dairy products had higher Framingham scores. Regarding the dairy products consumption and CVD risk factors also the link between the consumption of doogh with FBS and high-fat dairy products with TAG was observed. To our knowledge, no earlier studies have applied the FRS to assess the association between total dairy consumption and each type with a 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease. Only one study examined the association of milk consumption with FRS. The current study is the first to offer information on the relationship between total dairy consumption, and each of its types with Framingham score, and risk factors for CVD in women. In this study, we also considered the relationship between the consumption of doogh, which is one of the types of dairy products that are traditionally used in our country.

The FRS is a standard indicator, predicting a 10-year odd of developing CVD in persons who appear to be healthy⁽²⁴⁾. Previous studies have shown that FRS is an appropriate indicator for ranking subjects, and could be applied to examine the relationship between non-clinical factors and health⁽²⁷ ̵ ³¹⁾. FRS considers seven cardiovascular risk factors for its prediction, including age, sex, smoking, blood pressure,, HDL-C, TC, and history of diabetes⁽³²⁾. In the present study, the intake of total dairy and each of its types was directly related to future CVD events. The only study that used the FRS index did not agree with our result. Joo et al. showed that consuming more milk was associated with less FRS in Korean population. They examined only frequency intake of milk consumption with no attention to the amount of intake⁽¹³⁾.

Although so far only one study, as mentioned, has been conducted on FRS and milk consumption, several studies have examined the association of Framingham index components with dairy consumption. But the number of cohort studies that have seen relevance over a long period of time is not large, almost all of them have seen the opposite relationship or have not seen a connection. In the cohort study by Wang et al., it was showed that higher consumption (≥ 3 servings per day or week vs. <1 serving) of yogurt, total dairy, fermented milk products, and skimmed / low-fat milk, was correlated with a 0.2–0.6 mm Hg lower increase in SBP / year, and the extent of this link also decreased over time (i.e. with increasing age) in European population⁽¹²⁾. Heraclides and his colleagues also did not observe any favorable variation in hypertension (HTN) risk in the 1750 participants consuming dairy products, including total dairy, low-fat dairy, high-fat dairy, and fermented dairy after 10 years of follow-up⁽³³⁾. As mentioned, the Heraclides study categorized dairy products only in terms of fat and fermentation or not, did not examine all types of dairy products. Also it used a 5-day food recall to assess dairy intake, which was different from the tools we used. A longitudinal study by Drehmer et al. also found that dairy consumption, particularly fermented dairy, was inversely related to blood glucose and insulinemia measurements in Brazilian adults without diagnosed diabetes⁽³⁴⁾.

In this study, women with higher levels of doogh consumption showed higher serum FBS levels. There is no article on blood sugar and doogh consumption, and also there is no convincing explanation for this connection.

The present cross-sectional study showed that women with higher levels of high-fat dairy consumption had higher serum TAG levels. Similarly, in the study of Machlik et al., the consumption of low-fat cheese had a more favorable relationship with blood lipids than regular-fat cheese. However, this association was only observed with cheese and there was no significant relationship between low-fat yogurt and blood lipid concentration⁽³⁵⁾. Other studies disagreed with our finding. Chiu et al. study showed that a HF-DASH (high-fat dietary approaches to stop hypertension) diet reduced triglycerides compared to a regular dash diet, which in HF-DASH diet low-fat and nonfat dairy products were replaced by full-fat dairy products such as whole milk, cheese, and yogurt⁽³⁶⁾. In the study of Kai et al., there was also no relationship between high-fat dairy consumption and lipid parameters⁽³⁷⁾.

In the present study, we found no significant association between dairy consumption and its types with cardiovascular risk factors including HDL-C, TC, LDL-C, TG / HDL, TC / HDL, and FBS. This finding is consistent with a cross-sectional study performed to evaluate the association between dairy consumption and inflammation and cardiovascular risk factors among 107 elderly people aged 60–78 years. Rashidipour Fard and colleagues observed a higher but insignificant risk of an increase in TC and LDL with higher dairy intake⁽³⁸⁾. In studies with yogurts fermented with different strains of probiotic bacteria, some, but not all, demonstrated favorable influences on blood lipoproteins and lipids⁽³⁹⁾. In the study by Sadeghi et al., an inverse link was found between cheese consumption frequency and cardiovascular risk factors (including HDL-C, LDL-C, TG and FBS). However, this study used qualitative FFQ, which may lead to incorrect classification and underestimation, and provide only a rough estimate of cheese consumption. Moreover, in the study of Sadeghi et al., adjustment was not performed for receiving dietary supplements, and no attention was paid to the fat content of cheese⁽⁴⁰⁾.

In one clinical study, dairy consumption reduced FBS in the normal weight subgroup.In our study, with increasing tertile of dairy consumption, people's BMI increased, which may be a reason not to see a connection. However only men were included in mentioned clinical study⁽⁴¹⁾. In contrast to our study, Huth et al. showed that diets containing higher SF from whole milk increase LDL-C, which, occurred when substituted for unsaturated fatty acids or carbohydrates⁽³⁹⁾. In contrast, an American study found that consuming more dairy foods (whether low-fat or high-fat) was associated with better cardiovascular health. This study used the CHS (Cardiovascular Health Score) index to assess cardiovascular health, the components of which were different from the components we used for cardiovascular health⁽⁴²⁾.

As far as we know, there are limited research on the correlation between dairy consumption among women who are at greater risk for CVD. The use of semi-quantitative FFQ alongside main confounding variables is the prime strength of our current outcomes. We also examined the relationship between consumption of all kinds of dairy and low-fat and high-fat dairy products with CVD risk factors, and Framingham risk score, separately. However, this study has many limitations, which should be considered in subsequent studies. The cross-sectional design of the study did not let us make causal inferences. Thus, prospective assessments are required to specify these causations over longer courses. Dietary intake evaluation was not conducted with the weighted dietary records as a gold status way alongside FFQ. However, the reliability and validity of the FFQ have already been reported. Energy consumption was computed based on FFQ, which can lead to biased results. Our sample population consisted only of women, so we were unable to generalize our findings to both sexes. Eventually, however many major confounders were adjusted, the residual confounders are still possible.

Conclusions

In the present cross-sectional study, women with higher consumption of doogh and high-fat dairy products have greater serum levels of FBS and TAG respectively compared with those with lower consumption. However there was no association between dairy products other than doogh, low-fat and high-fat dairy products with other CVD risk factors. About FRS, intake of total dairy, low-fat and high-fat dairy products was associated with higher FRS. However no correlation was found between other dairy products alone with FRS. Future studies are needed to elucidate the link between dairy consumption and risk factors of CVD to characterize gender differences.

Abbreviations

CVD: cardiovascular disease, FRS: Framingham risk score, FBS: fasting blood sugar, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, TAG: triglyceride, CHD: coronary heart disease, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, IHD: ischemic heart disease, TUMS: Tehran university of medical sciences, FFQ: food frequency questionnaire, TC: total cholesterol, SBP: systolic blood pressure, BMI: body mass index, WHR: waist to hip ratio, SES: socio-economic status, MET: metabolic equivalent task, PA: physical activity, ANOVA: analysis of variance, SFA: saturated fatty acids, SD: standard deviation, HTN: hypertension, DASH: dietary approaches to stop hypertension, HF: high-fat, CHS: cardiovascular health score.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was supported by the Tehran University of Medical Sciences (grant number 99-3-212-50759)

Authors’ contributions

ZS wrote the article. NN performed data analysis and edited the article. LA corresponded and supplied the data of the article. 

Acknowledgments

We thank all those involved and participants for taking part in the present study. 

References

  1. Capewell S, O’Flaherty M. Rapid mortality falls after risk-factor changes in populations. Lancet 2011;378:752– 753.
  2. Sadeghi M, Haghdoost AA, Bahrampour A, et al. Modeling the burden of cardiovascular diseases in Iran from 2005 to 2025: The impact of demographic changes. Iran J Public Health 2017;46:506–516.
  3. Popkin BM. Global nutrition dynamics: The world is shifting rapidly toward a diet linked with noncommunicable diseases. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:289–298.
  4. Zarean E, R. Goujani, G. Rahimian, et al. 2019. Prevalence and risk factors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in southwest Iran: A population-based case-control study. Clinical and Experimental Hepatology 3 (3):224–31. doi:10.5114/ceh.2019.87635.
  5. Azizi F, A. Ghanbarian, M. Madjid, et al. 2002. Distribution of blood pressure and prevalence of hypertension in Tehran adult population: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS), 1999–2000. Journal of Human Hypertension 16 (5):305–12. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1001399.
  6. Sarrafzadegan N, and N. Mohammmadifard. 2019. Cardiovascular disease in Iran in the last 40 years: Prevalence, mortality, morbidity, challenges and strategies for cardiovascular prevention. Archives of Iranian Medicine 22 (4):204–10.
  7. Azizi F, Ghanbarian A, Momenan AA, et al. Prevention of non-communicable disease in a population in nutrition transition: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study phase II. Trials 2009;10:5. 21.
  8. Esmaillzadeh A, and Azadbakht L. Food intake patterns may explain the high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors among Iranian women. J Nutr 2008;138:1469–1475. 22.
  9.  Muga MA, Owili PO, Hsu CY, et al. Association between dietary patterns and cardiovascular risk factors among middle-aged and elderly adults in Taiwan: A populationbased study from 2003 to 2012. PLoS One 2016;11: e0157745. 23.
  10. D’Agostino RB, Russell MW, Huse DM, et al. Primary and subsequent coronary risk appraisal: New results from the Framingham study. Am Heart J 2000;139:272– 281.
  11. Dehghan M, Mente A, Rangarajan S, et al. Association of dairy intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2288-2297.
  12. Wang H, Livingstona K A, Fox C S, et al. Yogurt consumption is associated with better diet quality and metabolic profile in American men and women. Nutr Res. 2013;33(1):18-26.
  13. Joo N-S, Yang S-W, Park Soo-Jung, et al. Milk Consumption and Framingham Risk Score: Analysis of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data (2008–2011). Yonsei Med J. 2016;57(1):197-202.
  14. Bhupathi V, Mazariegos M, Cruz Rodriguez J B, et al. Dairy Intake and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020;22(3):11.
  15. He X, Matam B.R, Bellary S, et al. Chattopadhyay A. CHD Risk Minimization through Lifestyle Control: Machine Learning Gateway. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 5;10(1):4090.
  16. Gidding SS, Lichtenstein AH, Faith MS, et al(2009) Implementing American Heart Association pediatric and adult nutrition guidelines: a scientific statement from the American heart association nutrition committee of the council on nutrition, physical activity and metabolism, council on cardiovascular disease in the young, council on arteriosclerosis, thrombosis and vascular biology, council on cardiovascular nursing, council on epidemiology and prevention, and council for high blood pressure research. Circulation 119:1161–1175.
  17. Dehghan M, Mente A, Rangarajan S, et al. Association of dairy intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2288-2297.
  18. Khalili D, Hadaegh F, Soori H, et al. Clinical usefulness of the Framingham cardiovascular risk profile beyond its statistical performance: The Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Am J Epidemiol 2012;176:177–186.
  19. Elwood PC, Pickering JE, Hughes J, et al. Milk drinking, ischaemic heart disease and ischaemic stroke II. Evidence from cohort studies. Eur J Clin Nutr 2004;58:718–24.
  20. D’Agostino RB, Sr., Pencina MJ, Massaro JM, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk assessment: Insights from Framingham. Global Heart 2013;8:11–23.
  21. Sohn C, Kim J, and Bae W. The framingham risk score, diet, and inflammatory markers in Korean men with metabolic syndrome. Nutr Res Pract. 2012; 6(3):246–53.
  1. Darooghegi Mofrad M, Namazi N, Larijani B, et al. The association of food quality score and cardiovascular diseases risk factors among women: A cross-sectional study. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2019;11(3):237-243.
  2. Mirmiran P,  Hosseini Esfahani F,  Mehrabi Y, et al. Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in theTehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(5):654-62.
  3. Khalili D, Hadaegh F, Soori H, et al. Clinical usefulness of the Framingham cardiovascular risk profile beyond its statistical performance: The Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Am J Epidemiol 2012;176:177–186
  4. Neda Ismailzadeha, Predicting Framingham Cardiovascular Risk and Metabolic Syndrome Using Different Alternative Methods for Measuring Insulin Resistance, Dr. Amir Ziaei, Dr. Asghar Mohammadpour Asl, 1393.
  1. Ford ES, Giles WH, and Mokdad AH. The distribution of 10-year risk for coronary heart disease among US adults: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1791-6.
  2. Artigao-Rodenas L.M., Carbayo-Herencia A.J, Divisón-Garrote J A., et al., Framingham risk score for prediction of cardiovascular diseases: a population-based study from southern Europe. 8(9): p. e73529.
  3. Bozorgmanesh M, F. Hadaegh, and F.J.I.j.o.c.p. Azizi, Predictive accuracy of the ‘Framingham’s general CVD algorithm’in a Middle Eastern population: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. 2011. 65(3): p. 264-273.
  4. Carroll, S.J., Paquet C
    , Howard NJ, et al., Validation of continuous clinical indices of cardiometabolic risk in a cohort of Australian adults. 2014. 14(1): p.
  5. Cook, N.R., Paynter NP, Eaton CB, et al., Comparison of the Framingham and Reynolds Risk scores for global cardiovascular risk prediction in the multiethnic Women's Health Initiative. 2012. 125(14): p. 1748-1756.
  6. Selvarajah, S., Kaur G
    , Haniff J, et al., Comparison of the Framingham Risk Score, SCORE and WHO/ISH cardiovascular risk prediction models in an Asian population. 2014. 176(1): p. 211-218.
  7. Hemann, B.A., W.F. Bimson, and A.J.J.A.H.H.J. Taylor, The Framingham Risk Score: an appraisal of its benefits and limitations. 2007. 5(2): p. 91-96.
  8. Heraclides A, Mishra GD, Hardy RJ, et al. (2011) Dairy intake, blood pressure and incident hypertension in a general British population: the 1946 birth cohort. Eur J Nutr 51, 583–591.
  9. Drehmer M, Pereira MA, Schmidt MI, et al. Associations of dairy intake with glycemia and insulinemia, independent of obesity, in Brazilian adults: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101(4):775-82.
  10. Machlik ML, Hopstock LA, Wilsgaard T, et al. Associations of dairy intake with glycemia and insulinemia, independent of obesity, in Brazilian adults: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 ;101(4):775-82.
  11. Chiu S, Bergeron N, Williams PT, et al. Comparison of the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet and a higher-fat DASH diet on blood pressure and lipids and lipoproteins: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(2):341-7.
  1. Yung Kai SH, Bongard V, Simon C, et al. Low-fat and high-fat dairy products are differently related to blood lipids and cardiovascular risk score. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(12):1557-67.
  2. Rashidi Pour Fard N, Karimi M, Baghaei MH, et al. Dairy consumption, cardiovascular risk factors and inflammation in elderly subjects. ARYA Atheroscler. 2015;11(6):323-31.
  3. Huth P J, and Park K M. Influence of Dairy Product and Milk Fat Consumption on Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Review of the Evidence. Adv Nutr . 2012;3(3):266-85.
  4. Sadeghi M, Khosravi-Boroujeni H, Sarrafzadegan N, et al. Cheese consumption in relation to cardiovascular risk factors among Iranian adults- IHHP Study. Nutr Res Pract. 2014;8(3):336-41.
  1. Tanaka S, Uenishi K, Ishida H, et al. A Randomized Intervention Trial of 24-wk Dairy Consumption on Waist Circumference, Blood Pressure, and Fasting Blood Sugar and Lipids in Japanese Men with Metabolic Syndrome. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2014;60(5):305-12.
  2. Wang L, Manson JE, Buring JE, et al. Dietary intake of dairy products, calcium, and vitamin D and the risk of hypertension in middle-aged and older women. Hypertension 2008;51:1073–9.

Tables

Table 1 is available in the Supplemental Files section.