Seventy-five eyes of 75 RRD patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 36.7 ± 16 months (Range: 14–72 months). Demographics and clinical features were shown in Table 1. Age, gender, lens status, surgery type, endotamponade type and silicone oil retention time were not significantly associated with BCVA at 12 months.
Table 1
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics
| Total n = 75 (%) |
Age | 53.9 ± 17 years (Range: 11–85) |
Gender (M/F) (%) | 41 (54.7)/34 (45.3) |
Duration of Symptoms | 12.8 ± 13.5 days (Range: 1–90) |
Lens Status (phakic/pseudophakic) (%) | 48 (64.0)/27 (36.0) |
Extent of retinal detachment 1 quadrant 2 quadrants 3 quadrants 4 quadrants | 19 (25.3) 34 (45.3) 8 (10.7) 14 (18.7) |
Surgery type (%) PPV PPV + scleral buckle PPV + CEIOL | 47 (67.2) 22 (29.3) 6 (8.0) |
Endotamponde type (%) Silicone oil SF6 C3F8 | 52 (69.3) 1 (1.3) 22 (29.3) |
Silicone oil retention time | 8.3 ± 4.73 months |
CEIOL: cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation; C3F8: perfluoropropane; F: female; M: male; PPV: pars plana vitrectomy; SF6: Sulfur hexafluoride |
Preoperative Factors Affecting Visual Acuity
The mean BCVA preoperatively was 1.35 ± 1.24 (Range: 0-3.7), at postoperative 12th month was 0.66 ± 0.5 (Range: 0-1.6), at last follow-up was 0.58 ± 0.5 (Range: 0-1.6) logMAR. There was a statistically significant increase in BCVA at postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12 months and last visit compared to preoperative BCVA (all p values < 0.001).
Extent of detachment involved one quadrant in 19 (25.3%) patients, two quadrants in 34 (45.3%) patients, three quadrants in 8 (10.7%) patients, and four quadrants in 14 (18.7%) patients. Mean BCVA of these patients at postoperative 12th month visit was 0.41 ± 0.5, 0.67 ± 0.5, 0.55 ± 0.3, 0.96 ± 0.4 logMAR respectively (p = 0.03, post hoc analysis one quadrant detachment vs. four quadrant detachment p = 0.004).
The mean postoperative BCVA was significantly higher in patients who were operated in the first week of their onset of symptoms (Table 2). Twelve patients (16.0%) had VH and 4 patients (5.3%) had PVR at preoperative visits. Patients who were found to have PVR in the initial examination had significantly lower preoperative and postoperative BCVA (Table 2). Preoperative OCT images showed that 34 patients (45.3%) had intact baseline ELM. Preoperative ELM integrity was significantly related to postoperative visual outcome at 12 months (p < 0.001). Preoperative factors affecting visual acuity at postoperative 12 months were shown in Table 2.
Table 2
Preoperative Factors Affecting Postoperative Visual Acuity
| Preoperative BCVA (SD) | P value | POM1 BCVA (SD) | P value | POM3 BCVA (SD) | P value | POM6 BCVA (SD) | P value | POM12 BCVA (SD) | P value |
BCVA (n = 75) | 1.35 (± 1.2) | | 0.79 (± 0.5) | | 0.73 (± 0.5) | | 0.71 (± 0.5) | | 0.66 (± 0.5) | |
Duration of symptoms (Number of patients) | < 7 days before surgery (n = 33) | 1.22 (± 1.2) | 0.231 | 0.68 (± 0.5) | 0.03 | 0.58 (± 0.5) | 0.03 | 0.55 (± 0.5) | 0.01 | 0.53 (± 0.5) | 0.03 |
≥ 7 days before surgery (n = 42) | 1.50 (± 1.3) | 0.91 (± 0.4) | 0.86 (± 0.5) | 0.87 (± 0.5) | 0.81 (± 0.5) |
Preoperative ELM integrity | Intact (n = 34) | 0.67 (± 0.9) | < 0.01 | 0.55 (± 0.4) | < 0.01 | 0.40 (± 0.4) | < 0.01 | 0.40 (± 0.4) | < 0.01 | 0.35 (± 0.4) | < 0.01 |
Absent (n = 41) | 1.91 (± 1.2) | 0.99 (± 0.4) | 0.97 (± 0.4) | 0.93 (± 0.5) | 0.87 (± 0.4) |
Preoperative VH | Present (n = 12) | 2.01 (± 0.8) | 0.04 | 0.94 (± 0.4) | 0.23 | 0.88 (± 0.5) | 0.23 | 1.02 (± 0.5) | 0.02 | 0.92 (± 0.5) | 0.04 |
Absent (n = 63) | 1.22 (± 1.3) | 0.76 (± 0.5) | 0.69 (± 0.5) | 0.64 (± 0.5) | 0.60 (± 0.5) |
Preoperative PVR | Present (n = 4) | 3.50 (± 0.2) | < 0.01 | 1.45 (± 0.3) | 0.01 | 1.60 (± 0) | < 0.01 | 1.30 (± 0.3) | 0.03 | 1.10 (± 0.2) | 0.02 |
Absent (n = 71) | 1.23 (± 1.2) | 0.76 (± 0.4) | 0.67 (± 0.5) | 0.67 (± 0.5) | 0.64 (± 0.5) |
BCVA: Best corrected visual acuity. SD: Standard deviation. ELM: External limiting membrane. VH: Vitreous hemorrhage, POM: postoperative month, PVR: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy. All the visual acuities are in LogMAR. Bold p values are statistically significant. |
In univariate model, preoperative ELM integrity (ß=0.512; p < 0.001), preoperative vision (ß=0.334; p = 0.007) and symptom duration (ß=0.312; p = 0.006) were significantly related to postoperative BCVA at 12 months. However, in multivariate model only preoperative ELM integrity (ß=0.419; p < 0.05) was related to post operative BCVA at 12 months.
Postoperative Factors Affecting Visual Acuity
In univariate model, postoperative 1st month ELM integrity (ß=0.455; p < 0.001), 1st month EZ formation (ß=0.446; p < 0.001), 1st month CIZ formation (ß=0.344; p = 0.005), 1st month foveal bulge formation (ß=0.312; p = 0.002) were significantly related to postoperative BCVA at 12 months.
Postoperative Outer Retinal Changes
The hierarchical structure in ELM, EZ and CIZ restoration was observed in our study. The number of patients who had ELM restoration was the highest at first month postoperatively and was followed by patients who had EZ and CIZ restoration respectively. The numbers of patients with restoration of these outer retinal layers consecutively increased during the follow ups in the first year. ELM and EZ were absent in five (6.7%) patients at postoperative 12 months. These patients did not have an improvement in the outer retinal layers at last visit. CIZ restoration in one more patient and foveal bulge restoration in four more patients were seen at last visit after 12 months (Table 3). There was no significant BCVA increase at last visit compared to 12 months (p = 0.26).
Table 3
Preoperative and Postoperative Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT) Features
N: 75 | Preoperative n (%) | POM1 n (%) | POM3 n (%) | POM6 n (%) | POM12 n (%) | Last visit n (%) |
ELM Disrupted Intact | - 34 (45.3) | 16 (21.3) 37 (49.3) | 14 (18.6) 48 (64.0) | 11 (14.6) 54 (72.0) | 10 (14.2) 60 (80.0) | 9 (12.0) 61 (81.3) |
EZ Disrupted Intact | - | 20 (26.6) 23 (30.6) | 14 (18.6) 38 (50.6) | 17 (22.6) 42 (56.0) | 13 (17.3) 57 (76.0) | 8 (10.6) 57 (76.0) |
CIZ Disrupted Intact | - | 15 (20.0) 10 (13.3) | 21 (28.0) 13 (17.3) | 26 (34.6) 18 (24.0) | 26 (34.6) 25 (33.3) | 28 (37.3) 26 (34.6) |
Foveal bulge | - | 19 (25.3) | 28 (37.3) | 30 (40.0) | 36 (48.0) | 40 (53.3) |
CIZ: cone interdigitation zone; ELM: external limiting membrane; EZ: ellipsoid zone; POM: postoperative month, |
Twelve (16.0%) patients were under the age of 35, and all retinal layers were restored at postoperative 12 months in these patients. Epiretinal membrane was observed in 4 (5.3%) patients at postoperative last visit. Macular subretinal fluid (SRF) was observed in 13 patients (17.3%) at first postoperative visit and resolved in all patients at follow ups. Presence of SRF at first month did not significantly alter postoperative BCVA at 12 months (p = 0.74).
DISCUSSION
Anatomical success rates after surgery for RRD are as high as 90%, but unfortunately functional success might be lower in some patients[3, 4, 6, 9]. In this study, we investigated long term results of RRD surgery, preoperative and postoperative factors affecting visual outcome including SD-OCT features. SD-OCT provides in vivo visualization of retinal morphology in the macula with high resolution. It is helpful to monitor outer retinal changes in follow up of postoperative patients with RRD as it might affect prognosis.
In our study, the mean follow-up period of the patients was 36.7 ± 16 months. Similar studies have shorter follow up periods after surgery[3, 10]. This enabled us to evaluate both functional and OCT results for a longer period of time.
In various studies, it was shown that early surgery (within the first 7 days) for retinal detachment has a positive effect on the visual acuity outcome. Kim et al showed that patients who were operated in 6 days of visual symptom onset had significantly higher postoperative mean BCVA[14]. Williamson et al. also reported that mean postoperative BCVA was higher in patients who were operated in 3 days of symptom onset[3]. Patients who were operated in their first 7 days of complaints had significantly higher 1st, 3rd, and 6th, 12th and last visit BCVA Similarly our study demonstrated that early surgical intervention (< 7 days) had beneficial effect on postoperative visual acuity. This could be explained by photoreceptor damage in retinal detachment after seven days. It was shown in histopathological studies that prolonged detachment causes atrophy and apoptosis in photoreceptors [7, 9, 14, 15].
It was previously shown that extent of retinal detachment was associated with postoperative visual acuity. Williamson et al. and Park et al. found a statistically significant difference between the extent of detachment and the final BCVA[3, 6]. In our study, patients with 4 quadrants of detachment had significantly lower visual acuity at 12 months compared to patients with 1 quadrant detachment. It has been claimed that vitreous levels of transforming growth factor beta-3 (TGFB-3) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) were higher in patients with more extensive retinal detachment, suggesting inflammatory and apoptotic processes[15–18].
Presence of preoperative VH and/or PVR was a poor prognostic factor for BCVA at 12 months in our study. VH and/or PVR negatively affect regeneration of the outer retinal layers in RRD[3, 6, 13, 19–21]. It has been claimed that this may occur due to some mediators secreted and subretinal gliosis during PVR, affecting photoreceptor healing[22].
In this study, multivariate analysis showed that preoperative ELM integrity was highly related to outcome vision. ELM together with Muller cells forms the connection points in photoreceptors, and maintaining these connections is thought to accelerate photoreceptor healing. ELM damage indicates that retinal damage not only affects photoreceptors, but also spreads to the Muller cell layer. Again, duration of macular detachment and extent of detachment affects ELM integrity and restoration[6, 7, 9, 23].
Dell’Omo et al. showed that preoperative ELM integrity is strongly associated with postoperative BCVA similar to our results and they observed ELM restoration in first 6 months after surgery[9]. In our study although most of patients had ELM restoration at their 6 postoperative months, we have also seen restoration after this period. Even though anatomical restoration of outer retinal layers was observed even after 12 months, BCVA did not significantly improve after 12 months. Molecular studies are needed in the future to evaluate outer retinal restoration and it is functional effect.
In various studies, postoperative restoration of CIZ, EZ, ELM integrity and the restoration of foveal bulge positively affected the visual outcome[6–8, 10]. Our results were consistent with the literature. ELM, EZ and CIZ integrity may not be seen in OCT in the first postoperative month, but it was found that outer retinal layer could be formed in subsequent examinations. This shows that the regeneration and organization of the retinal layers may occur in the following months. Restoration of retinal layers can be visualized with OCT and this can be indicator of the functional prognosis.
The hierarchical structure in ELM, EZ and CIZ restoration was observed in our study. The number of patients who had ELM restoration was the highest and was followed by patients who had EZ and CIZ restoration respectively. The numbers of patients with restoration of these outer retinal layers consecutively increased during the follow ups. The EZ shows the inner segments, while the CIZ shows the outer segments. In photoreceptor regeneration, first development of the inner segments and then the outer segments was observed[7, 8, 24]. On the other hand, although the integrity of the outer layers is complete, functional success cannot be achieved in some patients. This may be due to loss of function of photoreceptors. Other cells might replace photoreceptors in the process of healing of outer segments[9].
The integrity of the retinal outer layers in the early postoperative period may be a good indicator of foveal bulge restoration and visual outcome[7, 9]. Foveal bulge is thought to occur due to the inner segments of the cones being wider than the outer segments. The restoration of foveal bulge can be associated with the presence of healthy cone cells. Again, the absence of foveal bulge in the postoperative period can be associated with photoreceptor damage[25–30]. In our study foveal bulge restoration improved visual outcome. In the study of Hasegawa et al., at 7 months follow-up, the restoration of foveal bulge was 28.6%[10].In our study, it was found to be 40% at 6 month follow-up and 48% 12 month visit. All retinal layers had regenerated at the end of the first year in patients less than 35 years of age. The regeneration capacity of retinal layers are considered higher at a young age[31].
The important advantages of our study are the relatively high number of patients and longer postoperative follow-up time compared to similar studies. Preoperative demographic, clinical, imaging findings and postoperative OCT findings of relatively high number of patients were evaluated. Limitations of our study included retrospective design and the fact that symptom duration relied on patient recalling. The OCT findings of the patients were examined in a holistic way, the thickness of isolated retinal layers and the change of these thicknesses during follow-up could not be evaluated. It is known that in a small percentage of cases who underwent retinal tamponade with silicone oil, ganglion cells can suffer a direct damage either from particles of oil that migrate in the retina or from direct contact with silicone[32]. But this toxicity was never clearly associated with visual loss and none of our patients had obvious silicone oil maculopathy or optic neuropathy on exam.
In conclusion, preoperative and postoperative factors can affect functional success in RRD surgery. Retinal outer layer regeneration can continue up to one year postoperatively, sometimes even longer. This regeneration especially first year postoperatively can be related to better functional outcomes. Preoperative ELM integrity and postoperative ELM restoration are main predictors of functional outcome.