Preoperative and Postoperative Factors Affecting Functional Success in Anatomically Successful Retinal Detachment Surgery

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1591133/v1

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate preoperative and postoperative factors affecting functional success in anatomically successful retinal detachment surgery.

Methods

75 eyes of 75 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) who underwent anatomically successful surgery, from 2014 to 2019 with more than one year follow up were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, ocular examination findings, preoperative and postoperative Spectral Domain Optic Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) images were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

The mean age was 53.9 ± 17 (range: 11–85). The mean follow-up period was 36.7 ± 16 (range: 14–72) months. The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the patients before surgery was 1.35 ± 1.24, and at postoperative 12 months was 0.66 ± 0.5 logMAR. Patients who were operated in 7 days of visual symptoms onset were found to have better visual acuity at the first and subsequent postoperative exams. Preoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), vitreous hemorrhage (VH) and extent of retinal detachment were found to have a negative effect on functional success at 12 months. Regeneration of the outer retinal layers had a positive effect on visual acuity at 12 months but did not significantly increase visual acuity after 12 months. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative external limiting membrane (ELM) integrity was significantly associated with better functional outcomes.

Conclusion

Early intervention, presence of preoperative ELM integrity and restoration of postoperative outer retinal layers positively affected functional success. The presence of preoperative VH, PVR and the extent of retinal detachment had a negative effect on prognosis at 12 months.

Introduction

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) can cause vision impairment in certain cases even after anatomically successful surgery. The incidence of RRD ranges from 5.3 to 12.6 cases per 100,000[1]. In uncomplicated cases, primary anatomical success rates are generally high[24]. Patients who were treated for macula off RRD might have broad range of visual acuity. It is important to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative parameters that could affect the final functional outcome.

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) allows visualizing retinal morphology in detail. In previous studies, the integrity of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and the external limiting membrane (ELM) and the presence of foveal bulge were associated with the final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) [510]. The other factors that were associated with postoperative visual outcome were preoperative visual acuity, age, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), and detachment duration [4, 1113]. However, these prognostic factors demonstrated some differences between studies.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the preoperative clinical and OCT findings that affect postoperative functional and visual improvement at different time points after RRD surgery in a large patient group.

Materials And Method

Charts of the patients who underwent surgery in Istanbul University Medical School Ophthalmology Department between January 2014 and May 2019 due to macula-off RRD were reviewed retrospectively. Study was approved by Medical, Surgical and Drug Research Ethics Committee of Istanbul University Istanbul Medical Faculty. Patients who had successful RRD repair, who showed up to regular follow ups and had SD-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) images at every follow-up were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria included patients with any other ophthalmologic pathology that affects vision, degenerative myopia, non rhegmatogenous etiology, recurrent retinal detachment, ambient opacities hindering imaging, macula-on RRD, history of ocular surgeries except cataract surgery.

Protocol

The demographic characteristics of the patients, BCVA, biomicroscopic examination findings, extent of detachment, detachment location, presence of accompanying PVR, vitreous hemorrhage (VH), and SD-OCT characteristics were recorded preoperatively. Surgical methods, duration of symptoms, central macular thickness, presence of subretinal fluid, ELM integrity, EZ integrity, cone interdigitation zone integrity (CIZ) and foveal bulge formation on SD-OCT at one, three, six, twelve months and at last examination were recorded.

BCVA was evaluated with Snellen chart and was converted to Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) equivalent for statistical analysis. Macula-off duration was defined as the time between surgery and onset of subjective complaints (deterioration of visual acuity, visual field defects, photopsia, and floaters). Preoperative ELM integrity was defined as absent, in cases which the integrity could not be evaluated because of folding, undulation, edema, and/or the cases in which ELM continuity was disrupted[6].

To evaluate retinal morphology, horizontal cross-sectional images by SD-OCT at each visit were analyzed. Retinal layers were defined as intact, disrupted (attenuation, discontinuity or disruption) and absent (total absence of layer) at central fovea. The foveal bulge was defined as an outer segment (OS) length at the central fovea being 10 µm longer than the average OS length at 250 µm temporal and nasal from the central fovea. OCT images were evaluated by two retina specialists who were blinded to patient’s examinations. Findings that were scored differently by two clinicians were discussed, re-evaluated and the final decision was recorded.

Surgical Procedure

Twenty-three gauge pars plana vitrectomy with gas or silicone oil was performed in all patients. Pars plana vitrectomy with additional scleral buckle was indicated in patients with PVR. Patients with visually significant cataracts underwent combined cataract and detachment repair surgery.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 (IBM corp. Armonk, NY, USA) statistics program. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is used to determine distribution of variables in each group. Independent t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests used to evaluate normally distributed data. For non-normally distributed data, Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used. A linear regression analysis was used to estimate the relationship between the potential influencing preoperative factors and BCVA at 12 months. In addition, a linear mixed effects regression model was performed to estimate the relationship between the changes of postoperative factors and the changes of BCVA after surgery. For the results, in the 95% confidence interval, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Seventy-five eyes of 75 RRD patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 36.7 ± 16 months (Range: 14–72 months). Demographics and clinical features were shown in Table 1. Age, gender, lens status, surgery type, endotamponade type and silicone oil retention time were not significantly associated with BCVA at 12 months.

Table 1

Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

 

Total n = 75 (%)

Age

53.9 ± 17 years (Range: 11–85)

Gender (M/F) (%)

41 (54.7)/34 (45.3)

Duration of Symptoms

12.8 ± 13.5 days (Range: 1–90)

Lens Status (phakic/pseudophakic) (%)

48 (64.0)/27 (36.0)

Extent of retinal detachment

1 quadrant

2 quadrants

3 quadrants

4 quadrants

19 (25.3)

34 (45.3)

8 (10.7)

14 (18.7)

Surgery type (%)

PPV

PPV + scleral buckle

PPV + CEIOL

47 (67.2)

22 (29.3)

6 (8.0)

Endotamponde type (%)

Silicone oil

SF6

C3F8

52 (69.3)

1 (1.3)

22 (29.3)

Silicone oil retention time

8.3 ± 4.73 months

CEIOL: cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation; C3F8: perfluoropropane; F: female; M: male; PPV: pars plana vitrectomy; SF6: Sulfur hexafluoride

Preoperative Factors Affecting Visual Acuity

The mean BCVA preoperatively was 1.35 ± 1.24 (Range: 0-3.7), at postoperative 12th month was 0.66 ± 0.5 (Range: 0-1.6), at last follow-up was 0.58 ± 0.5 (Range: 0-1.6) logMAR. There was a statistically significant increase in BCVA at postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12 months and last visit compared to preoperative BCVA (all p values < 0.001).

Extent of detachment involved one quadrant in 19 (25.3%) patients, two quadrants in 34 (45.3%) patients, three quadrants in 8 (10.7%) patients, and four quadrants in 14 (18.7%) patients. Mean BCVA of these patients at postoperative 12th month visit was 0.41 ± 0.5, 0.67 ± 0.5, 0.55 ± 0.3, 0.96 ± 0.4 logMAR respectively (p = 0.03, post hoc analysis one quadrant detachment vs. four quadrant detachment p = 0.004).

The mean postoperative BCVA was significantly higher in patients who were operated in the first week of their onset of symptoms (Table 2). Twelve patients (16.0%) had VH and 4 patients (5.3%) had PVR at preoperative visits. Patients who were found to have PVR in the initial examination had significantly lower preoperative and postoperative BCVA (Table 2). Preoperative OCT images showed that 34 patients (45.3%) had intact baseline ELM. Preoperative ELM integrity was significantly related to postoperative visual outcome at 12 months (p < 0.001). Preoperative factors affecting visual acuity at postoperative 12 months were shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Preoperative Factors Affecting Postoperative Visual Acuity

 

Preoperative BCVA (SD)

P value

POM1 BCVA (SD)

P value

POM3 BCVA (SD)

P value

POM6 BCVA (SD)

P value

POM12 BCVA (SD)

P value

BCVA (n = 75)

1.35 (± 1.2)

 

0.79 (± 0.5)

 

0.73 (± 0.5)

 

0.71 (± 0.5)

 

0.66 (± 0.5)

 

Duration of symptoms

(Number of patients)

< 7 days before surgery (n = 33)

1.22 (± 1.2)

0.231

0.68 (± 0.5)

0.03

0.58 (± 0.5)

0.03

0.55 (± 0.5)

0.01

0.53 (± 0.5)

0.03

≥ 7 days before surgery (n = 42)

1.50 (± 1.3)

0.91 (± 0.4)

0.86 (± 0.5)

0.87 (± 0.5)

0.81 (± 0.5)

Preoperative

ELM integrity

Intact (n = 34)

0.67 (± 0.9)

< 0.01

0.55 (± 0.4)

< 0.01

0.40 (± 0.4)

< 0.01

0.40 (± 0.4)

< 0.01

0.35 (± 0.4)

< 0.01

Absent (n = 41)

1.91 (± 1.2)

0.99 (± 0.4)

0.97 (± 0.4)

0.93 (± 0.5)

0.87 (± 0.4)

Preoperative VH

Present (n = 12)

2.01 (± 0.8)

0.04

0.94 (± 0.4)

0.23

0.88 (± 0.5)

0.23

1.02 (± 0.5)

0.02

0.92 (± 0.5)

0.04

Absent (n = 63)

1.22 (± 1.3)

0.76 (± 0.5)

0.69 (± 0.5)

0.64 (± 0.5)

0.60 (± 0.5)

Preoperative PVR

Present (n = 4)

3.50 (± 0.2)

< 0.01

1.45 (± 0.3)

0.01

1.60 (± 0)

< 0.01

1.30 (± 0.3)

0.03

1.10 (± 0.2)

0.02

Absent (n = 71)

1.23 (± 1.2)

0.76 (± 0.4)

0.67 (± 0.5)

0.67 (± 0.5)

0.64 (± 0.5)

BCVA: Best corrected visual acuity. SD: Standard deviation. ELM: External limiting membrane. VH: Vitreous hemorrhage, POM: postoperative month, PVR: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy. All the visual acuities are in LogMAR. Bold p values are statistically significant.

In univariate model, preoperative ELM integrity (ß=0.512; p < 0.001), preoperative vision (ß=0.334; p = 0.007) and symptom duration (ß=0.312; p = 0.006) were significantly related to postoperative BCVA at 12 months. However, in multivariate model only preoperative ELM integrity (ß=0.419; p < 0.05) was related to post operative BCVA at 12 months.

Postoperative Factors Affecting Visual Acuity

In univariate model, postoperative 1st month ELM integrity (ß=0.455; p < 0.001), 1st month EZ formation (ß=0.446; p < 0.001), 1st month CIZ formation (ß=0.344; p = 0.005), 1st month foveal bulge formation (ß=0.312; p = 0.002) were significantly related to postoperative BCVA at 12 months.

Postoperative Outer Retinal Changes

The hierarchical structure in ELM, EZ and CIZ restoration was observed in our study. The number of patients who had ELM restoration was the highest at first month postoperatively and was followed by patients who had EZ and CIZ restoration respectively. The numbers of patients with restoration of these outer retinal layers consecutively increased during the follow ups in the first year. ELM and EZ were absent in five (6.7%) patients at postoperative 12 months. These patients did not have an improvement in the outer retinal layers at last visit. CIZ restoration in one more patient and foveal bulge restoration in four more patients were seen at last visit after 12 months (Table 3). There was no significant BCVA increase at last visit compared to 12 months (p = 0.26).

Table 3

Preoperative and Postoperative Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT) Features

N: 75

Preoperative n (%)

POM1

n (%)

POM3

n (%)

POM6

n (%)

POM12

n (%)

Last visit

n (%)

ELM

Disrupted

Intact

-

34 (45.3)

16 (21.3)

37 (49.3)

14 (18.6)

48 (64.0)

11 (14.6)

54 (72.0)

10 (14.2)

60 (80.0)

9 (12.0)

61 (81.3)

EZ

Disrupted

Intact

-

20 (26.6)

23 (30.6)

14 (18.6)

38 (50.6)

17 (22.6)

42 (56.0)

13 (17.3)

57 (76.0)

8 (10.6)

57 (76.0)

CIZ

Disrupted

Intact

-

15 (20.0)

10 (13.3)

21 (28.0)

13 (17.3)

26 (34.6)

18 (24.0)

26 (34.6)

25 (33.3)

28 (37.3)

26 (34.6)

Foveal bulge

-

19 (25.3)

28 (37.3)

30 (40.0)

36 (48.0)

40 (53.3)

CIZ: cone interdigitation zone; ELM: external limiting membrane; EZ: ellipsoid zone; POM: postoperative month,

Twelve (16.0%) patients were under the age of 35, and all retinal layers were restored at postoperative 12 months in these patients. Epiretinal membrane was observed in 4 (5.3%) patients at postoperative last visit. Macular subretinal fluid (SRF) was observed in 13 patients (17.3%) at first postoperative visit and resolved in all patients at follow ups. Presence of SRF at first month did not significantly alter postoperative BCVA at 12 months (p = 0.74).

DISCUSSION

Anatomical success rates after surgery for RRD are as high as 90%, but unfortunately functional success might be lower in some patients[3, 4, 6, 9]. In this study, we investigated long term results of RRD surgery, preoperative and postoperative factors affecting visual outcome including SD-OCT features. SD-OCT provides in vivo visualization of retinal morphology in the macula with high resolution. It is helpful to monitor outer retinal changes in follow up of postoperative patients with RRD as it might affect prognosis.

In our study, the mean follow-up period of the patients was 36.7 ± 16 months. Similar studies have shorter follow up periods after surgery[3, 10]. This enabled us to evaluate both functional and OCT results for a longer period of time.

In various studies, it was shown that early surgery (within the first 7 days) for retinal detachment has a positive effect on the visual acuity outcome. Kim et al showed that patients who were operated in 6 days of visual symptom onset had significantly higher postoperative mean BCVA[14]. Williamson et al. also reported that mean postoperative BCVA was higher in patients who were operated in 3 days of symptom onset[3]. Patients who were operated in their first 7 days of complaints had significantly higher 1st, 3rd, and 6th, 12th and last visit BCVA Similarly our study demonstrated that early surgical intervention (< 7 days) had beneficial effect on postoperative visual acuity. This could be explained by photoreceptor damage in retinal detachment after seven days. It was shown in histopathological studies that prolonged detachment causes atrophy and apoptosis in photoreceptors [7, 9, 14, 15].

It was previously shown that extent of retinal detachment was associated with postoperative visual acuity. Williamson et al. and Park et al. found a statistically significant difference between the extent of detachment and the final BCVA[3, 6]. In our study, patients with 4 quadrants of detachment had significantly lower visual acuity at 12 months compared to patients with 1 quadrant detachment. It has been claimed that vitreous levels of transforming growth factor beta-3 (TGFB-3) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) were higher in patients with more extensive retinal detachment, suggesting inflammatory and apoptotic processes[1518].

Presence of preoperative VH and/or PVR was a poor prognostic factor for BCVA at 12 months in our study. VH and/or PVR negatively affect regeneration of the outer retinal layers in RRD[3, 6, 13, 1921]. It has been claimed that this may occur due to some mediators secreted and subretinal gliosis during PVR, affecting photoreceptor healing[22].

In this study, multivariate analysis showed that preoperative ELM integrity was highly related to outcome vision. ELM together with Muller cells forms the connection points in photoreceptors, and maintaining these connections is thought to accelerate photoreceptor healing. ELM damage indicates that retinal damage not only affects photoreceptors, but also spreads to the Muller cell layer. Again, duration of macular detachment and extent of detachment affects ELM integrity and restoration[6, 7, 9, 23].

Dell’Omo et al. showed that preoperative ELM integrity is strongly associated with postoperative BCVA similar to our results and they observed ELM restoration in first 6 months after surgery[9]. In our study although most of patients had ELM restoration at their 6 postoperative months, we have also seen restoration after this period. Even though anatomical restoration of outer retinal layers was observed even after 12 months, BCVA did not significantly improve after 12 months. Molecular studies are needed in the future to evaluate outer retinal restoration and it is functional effect.

In various studies, postoperative restoration of CIZ, EZ, ELM integrity and the restoration of foveal bulge positively affected the visual outcome[68, 10]. Our results were consistent with the literature. ELM, EZ and CIZ integrity may not be seen in OCT in the first postoperative month, but it was found that outer retinal layer could be formed in subsequent examinations. This shows that the regeneration and organization of the retinal layers may occur in the following months. Restoration of retinal layers can be visualized with OCT and this can be indicator of the functional prognosis.

The hierarchical structure in ELM, EZ and CIZ restoration was observed in our study. The number of patients who had ELM restoration was the highest and was followed by patients who had EZ and CIZ restoration respectively. The numbers of patients with restoration of these outer retinal layers consecutively increased during the follow ups. The EZ shows the inner segments, while the CIZ shows the outer segments. In photoreceptor regeneration, first development of the inner segments and then the outer segments was observed[7, 8, 24]. On the other hand, although the integrity of the outer layers is complete, functional success cannot be achieved in some patients. This may be due to loss of function of photoreceptors. Other cells might replace photoreceptors in the process of healing of outer segments[9].

The integrity of the retinal outer layers in the early postoperative period may be a good indicator of foveal bulge restoration and visual outcome[7, 9]. Foveal bulge is thought to occur due to the inner segments of the cones being wider than the outer segments. The restoration of foveal bulge can be associated with the presence of healthy cone cells. Again, the absence of foveal bulge in the postoperative period can be associated with photoreceptor damage[2530]. In our study foveal bulge restoration improved visual outcome. In the study of Hasegawa et al., at 7 months follow-up, the restoration of foveal bulge was 28.6%[10].In our study, it was found to be 40% at 6 month follow-up and 48% 12 month visit. All retinal layers had regenerated at the end of the first year in patients less than 35 years of age. The regeneration capacity of retinal layers are considered higher at a young age[31].

The important advantages of our study are the relatively high number of patients and longer postoperative follow-up time compared to similar studies. Preoperative demographic, clinical, imaging findings and postoperative OCT findings of relatively high number of patients were evaluated. Limitations of our study included retrospective design and the fact that symptom duration relied on patient recalling. The OCT findings of the patients were examined in a holistic way, the thickness of isolated retinal layers and the change of these thicknesses during follow-up could not be evaluated. It is known that in a small percentage of cases who underwent retinal tamponade with silicone oil, ganglion cells can suffer a direct damage either from particles of oil that migrate in the retina or from direct contact with silicone[32]. But this toxicity was never clearly associated with visual loss and none of our patients had obvious silicone oil maculopathy or optic neuropathy on exam.

In conclusion, preoperative and postoperative factors can affect functional success in RRD surgery. Retinal outer layer regeneration can continue up to one year postoperatively, sometimes even longer. This regeneration especially first year postoperatively can be related to better functional outcomes. Preoperative ELM integrity and postoperative ELM restoration are main predictors of functional outcome.

Declarations

Statements and Declarations: The authors declare no funds, grants or other support received during preparations of this manuscript. The Authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author Contributions: Study conception and design were performed by M.E.G and N.K.. Material preparation, data collection were performed by M.E.G. and Z.C. and analysis were performed by M.E.G and M.K.G. The first draft of the manuscript was written by M.E.G. and M.K.G and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Mitry D, Charteris DG, Fleck BW, et al (2010) The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: geographical variation and clinical associations. Br J Ophthalmol 94:678–684. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.157727
  2. Znaor L, Medic A, Binder S, et al (2019) Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD009562. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009562.pub2
  3. Williamson TH, Shunmugam M, Rodrigues I, et al (2013) Characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and their relationship to visual outcome. Eye 27:1063–1069. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2013.136
  4. Kunikata H, Nishida K (2010) Visual outcome and complications of 25-gauge vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; 84 consecutive cases. Eye 24:1071–1077. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.41
  5. Kobayashi M, Iwase T, Yamamoto K, et al (2019) Influence of submacular fluid on recovery of retinal function and structure after successful rhegmatogenous retinal reattachment. PLoS One 14:e0218216. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218216
  6. Park DH, Choi KS, Sun HJ, Lee SJ (2018) Factors Associated with Visual Outcome after Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery. Retina 38:137–147. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001512
  7. Kobayashi M, Iwase T, Yamamoto K, et al (2016) Association Between Photoreceptor Regeneration and Visual Acuity Following Surgery for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:889–898. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18403
  8. Kominami A, Ueno S, Kominami T, et al (2016) Restoration of Cone Interdigitation Zone Associated With Improvement of Focal Macular ERG After Fovea-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Reattachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:1604–1611. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-19030
  9. dell’Omo R, Viggiano D, Giorgio D, et al (2015) Restoration of foveal thickness and architecture after macula-off retinal detachment repair. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:1040–1050. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15633
  10. Hasegawa T, Ueda T, Okamoto M, Ogata N (2014) Relationship between presence of foveal bulge in optical coherence tomographic images and visual acuity after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina 34:1848–1853. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000160
  11. Pastor JC, Fernandez I, Rodriguez de la Rua E, et al (2008) Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Project–report 2. Br J Ophthalmol 92:378–382. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.129437
  12. Schwartz SG, Flynn HW (2008) Pars plana vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Clin Ophthalmol 2:57–63. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s1511
  13. Heimann H, Zou X, Jandeck C, et al (2006) Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 512 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-0026-3
  14. Kim JD, Pham HH, Lai MM, et al (2013) Effect of symptom duration on outcomes following vitrectomy repair of primary macula-off retinal detachments. Retina 33:1931–1937. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182877a27
  15. Lewis GP, Charteris DG, Sethi CS, et al (2002) The ability of rapid retinal reattachment to stop or reverse the cellular and molecular events initiated by detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2412–2420
  16. Kaur C, Foulds WS, Ling EA (2008) Blood-retinal barrier in hypoxic ischaemic conditions: basic concepts, clinical features and management. Prog Retin Eye Res 27:622–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.09.003
  17. Quintyn JC, Brasseur G (2004) Subretinal fluid in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: physiopathology and composition. Surv Ophthalmol 49:96–108
  18. Pollreisz A, Sacu S, Eibenberger K, et al (2015) Extent of Detached Retina and Lens Status Influence Intravitreal Protein Expression in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:5493–5502. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17068
  19. Wickham L, Ho-Yen GO, Bunce C, et al (2011) Surgical failure following primary retinal detachment surgery by vitrectomy: risk factors and functional outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1234–1238. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.190306
  20. de Silva DJ, Kwan A, Bunce C, Bainbridge J (2008) Predicting visual outcome following retinectomy for retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 92:954–958. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.131540
  21. Pastor JC (1998) Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: an overview. Surv Ophthalmol 43:3–18
  22. Charteris DG, Sethi CS, Lewis GP, Fisher SK (2002) Proliferative vitreoretinopathy-developments in adjunctive treatment and retinal pathology. Eye 16:369–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700194
  23. Hoang Q V, Linsenmeier RA, Chung CK, Curcio CA (2002) Photoreceptor inner segments in monkey and human retina: mitochondrial density, optics, and regional variation. Vis Neurosci 19:395–407
  24. Hoshino A, Ratnapriya R, Brooks MJ, et al (2017) Molecular Anatomy of the Developing Human Retina. Dev Cell 43:763–779 e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.029
  25. Gharbiya M, Grandinetti F, Scavella V, et al (2012) Correlation between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings and visual outcome after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina 32:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182180114
  26. Shimoda Y, Sano M, Hashimoto H, et al (2010) Restoration of photoreceptor outer segment after vitrectomy for retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 149:284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.025
  27. Wakabayashi T, Oshima Y, Fujimoto H, et al (2009) Foveal microstructure and visual acuity after retinal detachment repair: imaging analysis by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 116:519–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.001
  28. Nakanishi H, Hangai M, Unoki N, et al (2009) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging of the detached macula in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 29:232–242. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31818bcd30
  29. Schocket LS, Witkin AJ, Fujimoto JG, et al (2006) Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography in patients with decreased visual acuity after retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmology 113:666–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.003
  30. Lai WW, Leung GY, Chan CW, et al (2010) Simultaneous spectral domain OCT and fundus autofluorescence imaging of the macula and microperimetric correspondence after successful repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 94:311–318. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.163584
  31. Shu I, Ishikawa H, Nishikawa H, et al (2019) Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy for young japanese patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the era of microincision surgery: real-world evidence from a multicentre study in Japan. Acta Ophthalmol 97:e736–e741. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14050
  32. Pichi F, Hay S, Abboud EB (2020) Inner retinal toxicity due to silicone oil: a case series and review of the literature. Int Ophthalmol 40:2413–2422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01418-0