The efficiency and expression characteristics of foreign gene introduction into plants changes depending on the recipient plant and introduction method. Direct introduction of genes, such as biolistics and floral dip method, has the advantages of not requiring special manipulations and being less expensive, but has disadvantages including appearance of chimeras, requirement of expensive equipment and exhibition of low integration efficiency. A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation based on T-DNA transfer mechanisms has been widely used in plant breeding as a reliable method.
Improvement of plants by foreign gene transfer requires efficient expression of recombinant vectors and development from clones. Introduction of foreign genes through callus has the advantage of being able to perform antibiotics-mediated selection of transformation plants. However, plant regeneration and induction through callus is costly and has the disadvantage that it cannot be introduced into cultivars unable to induce callus. As efficient gene editing techniques such as CRISPR/Cas9 technology are being developed, the combination of efficient gene transfer methods can improve crop breeding.
When primary leaves are drawn from the coleoptile, the leaves that have already formed may be removed, increasing the probability of exposure of undifferentiated meristems. Abdul et al. (2011) obtained transgenic plants by cutting coleoptile of germinated wheat seedlings for the purpose of exposing meristem, and co-cultivating them with Agrobacterium culture. In this case, considering that previously differentiated leaves may interfere with Agrobacterium injection, drawing primary leaf may be considered to be a process to increase efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Although during primary leaf drawing, shoot apical meristem may not be directly exposed, infection due to the penetration of Agrobacterium culture into shoot apical meristem through the cell layers that make up the meristem may be possible. We illustrate the reasons underlying efficiency of this method in two ways.
One reason is that the primary leaf-drawn coleoptile may provide both spatial and temporal environment that supports the introduction foreign gene into shoot apical meristem. In previous methods, Agrobacterium culture was injected by placing Agrobacterium-coated cotton on meristem or spraying them (Wen-fang et al. 2018; Bipinchandra and Anita, 2016).In contrast, in case of Agrobacterium injection through coleoptile, Agrobacterium culture filled in coleoptile can infect meristem, maintaining activity for a relatively long time. Furthermore, infection had been mediated by wetting the shoot apical meristem and Agrobacterium culture (Bipinchandra and Anita, 2016), while our approach would have provided a spatial and temporal environment to support Agrobacterium infection.
Another reason is that wounds occur in meristem during the procedure of drawing primary leaves from coleoptile. In previous methods, shoot apical meristems were exposed artificially to be infected with Agrobacterium culture. In Wen-fang et al. (2018), Agrobacterium was treated to shoot apical meristem after cotyledon formation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), when differentiation may had already occurred. Considering that drawing primary leaves from coleoptile occurs during active cell division phase, and that sense of wound is the first step inducing Agrobacterium infection into plant cells (Yoel et al., 2012), the wound induced during primary leaf drawing may have promoted Agrobacterium infection, resulting in a high transformation efficiency.
In general, despite the fact that transformation by induction and expression regulation of genes of the same species origin is a major concern, the introduction of the AtDREB1A gene into rice has been extensively studied to improve stress tolerance. Karabi et al. (2012) found that overexpression of inserted AtDREB1A gene under the RD29A promoter may enhance drought stress tolerance compared to plants with OsDREB1A or OsDREB1B under the same promoter in rice. On the other hand, under the control of stress-induced promoters such as RD29A in transgenic plants, overexpression of the AtDREB1A gene was found to easily maintain leaf and shoot structure under stress (Karabi et al. 2012). Considering that overexpression of DREB1A transgene contributes to water balance maintenance in transgenic plants (Soumitra et al., 2015) and that the ICE1-DREB1 signaling pathway is well conserved in many plant species (Shan et al. 2014; Ding et al. 2015a, b), expression of AtDREB1A gene under RD29A stress-induced promoter may be a good way to enhance cold tolerance in rice.
In conclusion, the advantage of foreign gene transfer through coleoptile is that it is both simple and cheap method that does not interfere with the normal development of plants and does not require any equipment, depending on natural developmental status of plant. The callus induction and other direct introduction methods based on totipotence of plant cells essentially involve explant culture and introduction of foreign genes into them followed by regeneration of transgenic plant. This process is time consuming and laborious, exhibits low regeneration efficiency and causes unintended mutation. In our results, drawing primary leaves from coleoptile had no negative effect on plant development. This may be a simple method to obtain transgenic plants, increasing the efficiency of introduction and expression of foreign gene.