Evaluation of Quality of Life among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study

doi:10.21203/rs.2.10633/v1

Download PDF

Research article

Evaluation of Quality of Life among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.10633/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 03 Jun, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Urology →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Evaluation of Quality of Life among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study Background: Urinary complications are prevalent among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and evaluating the usefulness of treatment requires a direct measurement of the health-related quality of life (QOL). Therefore, this study was carried out aiming to determine the QOL of patients with MS and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out using multi-stage random cluster sampling method on 603 patients with MS who referred to the neurology clinic of Kashani and Alzahra treatment centers affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. The diagnosis of MS was approved among these patients based on the 2010 Revised McDonald Diagnostic Criteria by a neuroscientist. Data were collected through interviews using the questionnaire standard International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 (MSQOL-54). Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical tests. The significance level was considered to be less than 0.050. Results: The prevalence of LUTS among patients with MS was 84.2%, the prevalence rate of mixed, irritative, and obstructive urinary symptoms was 52.2%, 25.5%, and 6.5%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the combined dimensions of physical and mental health of QOL between the two groups with and without LUTS (P < 0.05). Moreover, logistic regression analysis revealed that there was a higher probability of a urinary tract problem among patients with MS and high EDSS score [0.67 (0.485-0.930), P = 0.02]. Conclusions: Due to the high prevalence rate of mixed LUTS among patients with MS and decrease in QOL, screening and attention to these symptoms are necessary in order to prevent secondary outcomes and improve QOL. Keywords: Multiple sclerosis, urinary symptoms, quality of life

Urology & Nephrology

Multiple sclerosis

urinary symptoms

quality of life

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause of neurological disabilities among young adults and the economically active age group of 20 to 40 years; in addition, the prevalence of its diagnosis among women is almost three times that among men. Today, around 2.5 million individuals suffer from MS around the world.^{[1, 2]} Based on previous studies, the incidence rate of this disease in Iran is estimated to be between 5.3 and 74.28 per one hundred thousand people.^[3]

MS is the most common progressive neurological disorder, causing a wide range of functional limitations, including lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), which are observed in 50-80 percent of patients during the course of the illness and have a dramatic negative impact on patients’ quality of life (QOL) and their ability to execute social roles.^[4,5] Neurogenic LUTS in MS can include urinary incontinence (UI) or urinary retention or a combination of both.^[1,6] LUTS differ to a large extent from one patient to the other^[7] and are accompanied by significant psychological effects and the highest rate of socially debilitating outcomes of MS,^[8] which cause severe limitations in activity levels.^[6] Patients with MS and bladder dysfunction reported that LUTS constrained their daily activities, and the physical and clinical burden associated with MS and UI negatively affected their QOL, causing feelings of shame, depression, skin fragility, and social isolation.^[9] Moreover, LUTS limits their lifestyle choices, and become dependent on caregivers.^[10,11] Furthermore, this complication reduces their participation in health development programs, and hence, the secondary complications of the disease increase and their QOL is further reduced.^[12] LUTS associated with MS significantly increase the economic consequences related to nursing care and incontinence therapies and related urinary infections.^[13] The overall cost of care for bladder complications in the United States, including loss of productivity, has been estimated to be more than 65 billion dollars annually.^[14] In addition, bladder dysfunction has a negative effect on the sexual performance of the patient and is a threat to the upper urinary tract as it can lead to permanent urinary tract disorder; thus, it has been recognized as a health problem among this population.^[14-15] Patients with MS have lower QOL in comparison to the general population, as well as compared to patients with other chronic illnesses. The extensive physical disability of, lack of effective treatment for, and unknown causes of MS are indicative of its negative impact on the QOL of patients.^[16] A longitudinal study showed that the ratio of patients with MS and at least one symptom of bladder dysfunction significantly increased over time both among men and women and had a significant relationship with high levels of physical disability and health-related QOL at any point of follow-up for both men and women with MS.^[17]

It has been shown that a remarkable decrease in QOL is associated with long duration of illness among patients with MS and bladder disorders, indicating the need to identify the signs and symptoms involved in their reduced QOL.^[18] Therefore, due to differences in the incidence rate of bladder dysfunction in different communities, clinical symptoms and bladder disorder, and the demographic characteristics of patients with MS, and the serious impact of these disorders on QOL, the present study was conducted aiming to evaluate the QOL of patients with MS and LUTS.

This cross-sectional study was carried out from 23 August 2017 to 19 April 2016 on 603 patients with MS who referred to the neurology clinic of Kashani and Alzahra treatment centers affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. In this study, the participants were selected using the multi-stage random cluster sampling method and cluster volume was determined in accordance with their population size. The duration of the disease and gender were, respectively, considered as the first and second classes, and the separated number of men and women as clusters. In general, the sample was selected proportional to the sample size for men and women classes using a random number table. Based on the results of a previous study^[18] with the prevalence of urinary symptoms (P = 0.51), 5% accuracy, and 95% confidence interval (CI) and taking into account d = 0.04 and a 10% sample loss, the number of samples was estimated to be 660. Among the selected subjects, 38 and 19 patients were excluded from the study due to their lack of willingness to cooperate and complete the questionnaire, and due to MS relapse and corticosteroid therapy, respectively.

The study inclusion criteria were a definitive diagnosis of MS by a neurologist based on the 2010 Revised McDonald Diagnostic Criteria,^[19] age of above 18 years, admittance to a referral clinic, physical and mental ability to answer questions (lack of physical or cognitive deficiencies causing inability to answer the questions correctly), residing in Isfahan, willingness to participate in the study, and lack of bladder dysfunction for a different cause (before the onset of MS). Moreover, the exclusion criteria included the unwillingness to continue collaboration in the study and complete the questionnaire, MS relapse in the previous month, and treatment with corticosteroids. After sampling using the multi-stage random cluster sampling method and completion of informed consent forms by the subjects, all the data in this study were collected through interviews using a four-part questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire included 6 questions on demographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, educational status, occupation, and economic status). The second part contained 5 questions regarding clinical information (duration of disease, age at the time of diagnosis, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, pattern of clinical course of MS, and type and duration of use of drugs). The third part included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). The IPSS includes 7 specific questions on irritative and obstructive LUTS and an additional question on general satisfaction with the urinary condition which has not been used in the scale scoring. The IPSS questionnaire has been recommended for the preliminary assessment of LUTS.^[20] The scoring system of this questionnaire was based on patient statements and it was not an objective questionnaire. It includes questions about daily urine frequency, urgency, and nocturnal polyuria, reflecting the status of irritative or storage LUTS (maximum score of 15), and incomplete voiding of the bladder, interruption of the urine flow, poor flow of urine, and exerting force at the onset of urination indicating obstructive or voiding symptoms (maximum score of 20). The questions are scored based on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no problem) to 5 (always), and the scoring of the symptoms was based on the frequency scale ranging from 0 to 5. The total score was calculated through summing up the quantitative score of the 7 questions on LUTS (range: 0-35); moreover, scores of 0-7, 8-19, and 20-35 indicate lack of symptoms or presence of mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms, respectively. In this study, the Persian version of the IPSS questionnaire translated by Panahi et al. was used.^[21] They showed that this questionnaire with a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.7, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.87, and Pearson’s product moment coefficient of 0.92 is a valid and reliable scale. The fourth part of the questionnaire included the 54-item Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL-54), of which 18 questions addressed 14 areas specific to patients with MS, including physical performance (10 questions), role limitation due to physical problems (4 questions), role limitation due to mental problems (3 questions), health changes (1 question), social function (3 questions), health threats (4 questions), sexual function (4 questions), satisfaction with sexual function (2 questions), pain (3 questions), energy (5 questions), perception of general health (5 questions), total QOL (2 questions), cognitive function (4 questions), mental well-being (5 questions), and 36 questions addressed general QOL. The questions were scored based on Likert scales with 2 to 7 options. Finally, the QOL score of the patients was determined by the scores considered for the two combined dimensions of physical and mental health. Each question is scored between 0 and 100. The two combined physical and mental health dimensions of QOL were obtained through calculating the specific weight percentage for each final score in each dimension. For all dimensions, higher scores represented a better status. In this study, the Persian version of the MSQOL-54 questionnaire was used which was standardized by Ghaem et al.^[22] with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.962 for the measurement of QOL among patients with MS; they reported that it had appropriate structural characteristics, validity, and reliability.The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistical tests of mean and standard deviation (SD) and inferential statistical tests including chi-square (χ²) test, independent t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and logistic regression in SPSS software (version 18, SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). The significance level was considered to be less than 0.050.

Of the 603 patients with MS, 508 (84.2%) reported LUTS. Mild, moderate, and severe urinary symptoms had a rate of 58.8%, 32.6%, and 6.8%, respectively. The prevalence rate of mixed, irritative, and obstructive symptoms was 52.2%, 25.5%, and 6.5% respectively. Moreover, 15.4% of women and 17.1% of men lacked any LUTS. The prevalence rates of mixed, irritative, and obstructive symptoms were 51.1%, 28.1%, and 4.5% among women and 56.5%, 16.3%, and 10.1% among men, respectively. Chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups in this respect (P = 0.020). The prevalence of LUTS differed significantly between age groups of below or above 30 years and also among individuals with different educational levels. There was no significant difference among subjects with and without LUTS in terms of marital status, economic status, and body mass index (BMI) (Table 1).

Among the patients, 19.7%, 4.6%, and 15.0% of the individuals with, respectively, mild, moderate, and severe disability had no LUTS. In addition, 44.0%, 72.8%, and 75.0% of the patients with, respectively, mild, moderate, and severe disability had concurrent irritative and obstructive symptoms, and chi-square test showed a significant difference among the three groups (P < 0.001). No LUTS were observed among 19.5%, 16.5%, and 9.4% of patients with the illness duration of, respectively, less than 5 years, 5-10 years, and more than 10 years. Moreover, 43.3%, 50.5%, and 67.5% of the patients with the illness duration of, respectively, less than 5 years, 5-10 years, and more than 10 years had concurrent irritative and obstructive symptoms (mixed), and chi-square test indicated a significant difference among the three groups (P = 0.001). No LUTS were observed among 32.1%, 17.4%, and 5.2% of the patients with, respectively, CIS, relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), and progressive MS. Furthermore, 32.1% of the patients with CIS had only irritative symptoms, and 48.1% and 75.0% of the patients with, respectively, RRMS and progressive MS had simultaneous irritative and obstructive symptoms, and chi-square test showed two significant differences among the three groups (P < 0.001) (Table 2).

The mean score of all dimensions of QOL, except for health changes, as well as the combined dimensions of physical and mental health in the LUTS-free group was significantly higher compared to the group with mild, moderate, and severe LUTS. There was a statistically significant difference in all dimensions, except for health changes (ANOVA, P < 0.050), among the four groups (Table 3). Logistic regression analysis also suggested a higher possibility of urinary tract complication among patients with MS and a higher score of EDSS [0.67 (0.485-0.930); P = 0.020] (Table 4).

MS with focal demyelinating lesions at different levels of the central nervous system (CNS) leads to urinary dysfunction.^[23] In the present study, the prevalence of LUTS was high among patients with MS (reaching to more than ¾ of the patients), and 41.3% of patients had moderate to severe urinary symptoms. This finding was similar to the findings of the study by Nakipoglu with an 80.81% prevalence of LUTS and the study by Sammarco with 43% moderate to severe bladder dysfunction among patients with MS.^[13,24] The different estimates reported for the prevalence of LUTS in MS range between 32% and 97%,^[25,26] and the high prevalence of LUTS suggests the complexity of neural control of the function of the bladder and urinary tract and the location and nature of the neural lesions determines the pattern of bladder dysfunction.^[27]

In the present study, more than half of the patients with MS had mixed urinary tract symptoms and the incidence of storage or irritative symptoms was higher in comparison to urination or obstructive symptoms. In the study carried out by Onal et al., the prevalence rate of mixed symptoms among patients with MS (70%) was higher than the irritative (25%) and obstructive symptoms (5%) alone.^[36]In addition, in the cross-sectional study by Ojewola et al., storage or irritative symptoms with an prevalence rate of 48.2% were more common than urination and post-urination symptoms with rates of 36.8% and 29.9%, respectively, in patients with MS.^[29]Reports from western countries have indicated that irritative symptoms (storage phase) are prominent symptoms of the urinary tract, while in eastern countries, the prevalence of obstructive symptoms (voiding phase) is higher than irritative symptoms.^[30]

In addition, in this study, more than half of the men and women reported mixed symptoms, and the prevalence rate of irritative symptoms among women alone and obstructive symptoms among men alone was higher and the difference was statistically significant. In this regard, the study by Sand et al. also indicated that 60% of men and 50% of women with MS had reported mixed symptoms;^[18] however, the results of the study by Aharony indicated that there was no significant correlation between the overall incidence of LUTS and gender.^[31] The results of an investigation on 8284 men and women in China, Taiwan, and South Korea revealed that the prevalence of storage symptoms alone was higher among women compared to men (23.8% versus 12.6%, respectively) and obstructive symptoms alone had a rate of 7.2%.^[32] However, due to the widespread nature of the lesions of the nervous system among patients with MS, numerous levels of control of the function of the bladder and intestine are observed,^[8] and the nature of urination complaints and LUTS varies among patients with MS.^[26] In addition, LUTS change over time along with the dynamic course of MS. Therefore, continuous and regular follow-up assessment is required in patients with MS.^[27]

In the current study, the prevalence of mixed urinary symptoms in patients over 30 years of age (55.1%) was higher than the age group of below 30 years (46%), and the difference was statistically significant. The results of a study showed a high prevalence rate for LUTS among men and women with a minimum age of 40 years and a significant increase in LUTS with age in the general population (at the age of 40-44 years to over 60 years with a prevalence of 49.9% and 69.7%, respectively).^[32] Based on a cross-sectional population-based study, there was a relationship between LUTS and age among women, but not among men, as younger men had a lower prevalence of LUTS in comparison to younger women, and older men had higher LUTS prevalence rate in comparison to older women.^[33] Moreover, another study, a significant positive correlation was found between age and LUTS.^[34]

In the current study, the prevalence of LUTS among patients with an education level of below diploma was higher than those with diploma and university degrees, and the difference was statistically significant. In this regard, the results of a cross-sectional study based on population in Australia did not show a significant positive correlation between LUTS and educational status.^[34]

The present study showed that the prevalence of irritative LUTS was higher in patients with MS with mild disability (EDSS ≤ 3). Nevertheless, the prevalence of mixed LUTS among patients with severe disability (EDSS ≥ 7) was higher than patients with mild to moderate disability and the difference was statistically significant. In the study by Di Filippo, 44% of patients with mild EDSS reported bladder dysfunction and this rate was increased among patients with moderate and severe disability (81%) and EDSS and the severity of corticospinal pathways had a significant correlation with the prevalence of irritative symptoms.^[35] In addition, another study revealed that there was relationship between a high degree of disability and high levels of LUTS.^[36]

Khalaf et al. found that patients with MS with higher degree of disability had higher irritative symptoms (urgency and UI),^[38] and the findings of the study by Onal revealed a weak correlation between EDSS severity and storage, urination, and total scores.^[28] Arhrony found that irritative (storage) symptoms are associated with EDSS and the involvement of pyramidal pathways, but this association is very weak with obstructive symptoms.^[31] In some other studies, there was a direct correlation between the EDSS score and irritative or obstructive symptom score,^[38,39] albeit no relationship was reported between these variables in the studies by Miller and Porru.^[40,41] It seems that the differences in the results of different studies are due to the clinical course of MS which the patients under study were undertaking during the study period. De Carvalho showed that in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMO-SD), the severity of disability was a predictor of bladder dysfunction and detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia (DESD). ^[42]

The present study indicated that the prevalence of irritative LUTS was higher among patients with MS and disease duration of less than 5 years, but the prevalence of mixed LUTS in patients with MS and disease duration of more than 10 years was higher compared to patients with MS and disease duration of less than 5 years and between 5-10 years, and the difference was statistically significant. The results of a study in Brazil showed a weak significant relationship between the duration of the disease and the presence of urinary dysfunction, and the degree of urinary dysfunction increased over the years.^[43] In another study, the duration of disease and higher degree of disability only had a significant relationship with higher levels of urinary symptoms in women.^[13] The review of data from the American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) showed that, with an increase in the duration of disease, the severity and prevalence of LUTS increased, so that on average 35-39% of patients 5-6 years after the onset of the disease, and in contrast, 64% of patients with a 17.1 year history of disease reported LUTS.^[44]

The current study revealed that the prevalence of LUTS was higher in patients with CIS; however, the prevalence of mixed LUTS in patients with progressive MS was higher in comparison to patients with MS with RRMS and CIS, and the difference was statistically significant. De Almedia reported prevalence rates of 63.5% and 100%, respectively, among patients with RRMS and primary progressive MS.^[43]Moreover, a study by Wang et al. showed the lowest OBASS score in patients with CIS.^[23]

In the present study, patients with MS and LUTS symptoms compared to LUTS-free patients had lower QOL scores in all dimensions except for health changes and there was a significant difference in the combined physical and mental health dimensions of QOL between the two groups with and without LUTS. In addition, there was a higher possibility of a urinary tract complication in patients with MS with a higher EDSS score. These results were basically similar to the results of a population-based cross-sectional study in Korea performed on 658 individuals; nearly a quarter (25.5%) of the population with LUTS had lower QOL scores.^[36] In this regard, Wang found that the higher the EDSS score, the higher the possibility of LUTS.^[31] Furthermore, the study by Khalaf et al. suggested that patients with MS with immediate urgency and UI had significantly lower QOL in comparison to patients with MS without these symptoms.^[45]

The strengths of this study included the appropriate sample volume and suitable ratio of men to women based on the proportion of MS prevalence rate in society. Considering the fact that the research was based on patients’ own statements on LUTS, the memory capacity of the subjects to recall their past information was one of the limitations in this study. Moreover, mind obsessions and everyday issues and factors such as fatigue, economic and family issues, or the presence of the inquirer when completing the questionnaire could affect the way in which the participants responded to the questionnaire.

Based on the results of this study, mixed LUTS were the most common type of symptoms and the incidence of mixed LUTS was higher among patients with progressive MS with a duration of more than 10 years and EDSS ≥ 7. In addition, the chance of having a urinary tract disorder was higher among patients with MS and high EDSS score. Moreover, the QOL of patients with MS and urinary tract problem was lower compared to those without a urinary tract problem; hence, screening and attention to these symptoms is necessary in order to prevent secondary outcomes and improve QOL.

MS: Multiple sclerosis; LUTS: lower urinary tract symptoms; QOL: quality of life; IPSS: International Prostate Symptom Score; MSQOL-54: 54-item Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life; EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale; DESD: dysfunction and detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia; CIS: Clinically isolated syndrome; RRMS: Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; NARCOMS :American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis ; OBASS :Overactive Bladder Symptom Score

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences No. 394911. Then, written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication: Not applicable
Availability of data and material: Not applicable
Competing interests: Not applicable
Funding: Not applicable
Authors' contributions; Mrs. FN contributed primarily to the Conception, Design, interview, analyzing, and interpreting the data and writing the manuscript. Dr. VSH contributed in the design, Data interpretation, manuscript writing and editing and supervision and final approval of the version to be published, Dr. MMS and Dr. VH participated in the design and have been involved in Manuscript review and editing, Dr. MMG contributed in designing of the study and statistical analysis, and all authors have read and approve the final version of manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the research project approved with No. 394911. The kind cooperation of the deputy of research of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, deputy chairman of the School of Medicine and its deputy of research, the deputy chairman of Kashani and Alzahra hospitals, the authorities of Kashani and Alzahra hospitals, and the participants of the study is sincerely appreciated

Hickey J. Clinical practice of neurological & neurosurgical nursing: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014
Woodward S, Mestecky AM. Neuroscience Nursing: Evidence-Based Theory and Practice: John Wiley & Sons; 2011
Etemadifar M, Maghzi A-H. Sharp increase in the incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Isfahan, Iran. Multiple Sclerosis Journal 2011; 17(8):1022-7
Mahajan S. T., Frasure H. E. Marrie R. A. The prevalence of urinary catheterization in women and men with Multiple Sclerosis, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2013; 36(6):632-637
Chapple CR, Khullar V, Gabriel Z, et al. The effects of antimuscarinic treatments in overactive bladder: An update of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2008; 54:543-62
Hay-Smith E Jean C, Siegert Richard J, Weatherall Mark, Abernethy David A, Bladder and bowel dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A review of treatment effectiveness 2007; 13( 3):81-89
Hinkl Janice L &Cheever Kerry H, Brunner & Suddarths Text book of medical surgical nursing 2014, 13th edition, Wolters Kluwer Health /Lippincott Williams &Wilkins
Payamani F, Nazari AA, Noktehdan H, Ghadiriyan F, Karami K, Complementary Therapy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis]. Iran Journal of Nursing 2012; 25(77): 12-20. [Persian]
Brucker BM, Nitti VW, Kalra S, Herbert J, Sadiq A, Utomo P, Aponte MM. Barriers experienced by patients with multiple sclerosis in seeking care for lower urinary tract symptoms. Neurourology and urodynamics 2017; 36(4):1208-13
Flowler CI,Panicker JN,Drake M,etal , A Uk consensus on the management of the bladder in multiple sclerosis . Journal Neurol Neurosurg psychiatry 2009; 80:470-477

Kobelt G., Berg J. D. Atherly, Hadjimichael O, Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study in the United States, Neurology 2006; 66(11): 1696–1702
Cello, D.F, Measuring quality of life in palliative care, Semin. Oncolo 1995; 22, 23-81. Aarnoson 1088
Sammarco Anne G, Orasanu Bogdan, Mahajan Sangeeta T,.The Bladder in MS: A Review. Neurol Neurophysiol2014; 5:3
Yousefi Alireza, Shaghaghi Farhad, Dehestani Mehdi, Barghi Irani Ziba , The Relationship between Quality of Life (QoL) and Psychological Capital with Illness Perception in MS Patients , Health Psychology 2012; 1(1) : 1-14
Vodušek DB. Lower urinary tract and sexual dysfunction in neurological patients. European neurology. 2014; 72(1-2):109-15.
Rezapour A, Almasian Kia A, Goodarzi S, Hasoumi M, Nouraei Motlagh S, Vahedi S. The impact of disease characteristics on multiple sclerosis patients’ quality of life. Epidemiol Health 2017;39:e2017008
Nortvedt MW, Prevalence of bladder, bowel and sexual problem among multiple sclerosis patients two five years after diagnosis. Multiple Sclerosis 2007;13 (1) 106-112
Sand PK, Sand RI. The diagnosis and management of lower urinary tract symptoms in multiple sclerosis patients. Disease-a-month: DM 2013;59(7):261-8.
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011;69:292‑302
Denis L, McConnell J, Khoury S, Abrams P, Barry M, Bartsch G, et al. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: the evaluation and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. In: Denis L, Griffiths D, Khoury AT, Cockett K, McConnell J, Chatelain C, et al. Proceedings of the 4th International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. United Kingdom: Plymbridge Distributors, Ltd.1998: 669-684.
Panahi Ali, Bidaki Reza, Mehraban Darab, Rezahosseini Omid. Validity and Reliability of Persian Version of International Prostate Symptom Score. GMJ. 2013;2(1):18-21
Ghaem H, Borhani Haghighi A. The impact of disability, fatigue and sleep quality on the quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2008;11:236-241

Wang T, Huang W, Zhang Y,. Clinical Characteristics and Urodynamic Analysis of Urinary Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis. Chin Med J2016;129:645-50
Nakipoglu G, Kaya A, Orhan G, Tezen O, Tunc H, Ozgirgin N, et al. Urinary dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2009;16(10):1321-4.
De Sèze M, Ruffion A, Denys P, Joseph P-A, Perrouin-Verbe B, group IFN-Ues. The neurogenic bladder in multiple sclerosis: review of the literature and proposal of management guidelines. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2007;13(7):915-28.
Kalsi V, Fowler CJ. Therapy Insight: bladder dysfunction associated with multiple sclerosis. Nat Clin Pract Urol2005; 2(10): 492-501
Panicker JN, Fowler CJ, Kessler TM. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in the neurological patient: clinical assessment and management. The Lancet Neurology 2015;14(7):720-32.
Onal, B., Siva, A., Buldu, I., Demirkesen, O., & Cetinel, B. Voiding dysfunction due to multiple sclerosis: a large scale retrospective analysis. International braz j urol2009; 35(3), 326-333.
Ojewola RW, Oridota ES, Balogun OS, Ogundare EO, Alabi TO. Lower urinary tract symptoms: prevalence, perceptions, and healthcare-seeking behavior amongst Nigerian men. The world journal of men's health. 2016; 34(3):200-8.
Araki, I., Matsui, M., Ozawa, K., Nishimura, M., Kuno, S., & Saida, T. Relationship between urinary symptoms and disease-related parameters in multiple sclerosis. Journal of neurology 2002; 249(8): 1010-1015.
Aharony, S. M., Lam, O., & Corcos, J. Treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in multiple sclerosis patients: Review of the literature and current guidelines. Canadian Urological Association Journal 2017; 11(3-4), E110.
Chapple, C., Castro-Diaz, D., Chuang, Y. C., Lee, K. S., Liao, L., Liu, S. P., & Sumarsono, B. Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in China, Taiwan, and South Korea: results from a cross-sectional, population-based study. Advances in therapy, 2017; 34(8): 1953-1965

Boyle P, Robertson C, Mazzetta C, Keech M, Hobbs F, Fourcade R, et al. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in men and women in four centres. The UrEpik study. BJU international. 2003;92(4):409-14.
Haidinger G, Madersbacher S, Waldhoer T, Lunglmayr G, Vutuc C. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in Austrian males and associations with sociodemographic variables. Eur J Epidemiol 1999; 15: 717– 22
Di Filippo, M., Proietti, S., Gaetani, L., Gubbiotti, M., Di Gregorio, M., Eusebi, P., & Giannantoni, A. Lower urinary tract symptoms and urodynamic dysfunction in clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. European journal of neurology 2014; 21(4), 648-653.
Marrie, R. A, Cutter, G, Tyry, T, Vollmer, T., & Campagnolo, D. Disparities in the management of multiple sclerosis–related bladder symptoms. Neurology 2007;68(23), 1971-1978.
Khalaf K, Globe D, Armstrong E, Malone D, Coyne K. Health-related quality of life among patients with MS and urinary symptoms. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers; June 1, 2012; San Diego, CA
DasGupta, R., & Fowler, C. J. Bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Drugs 2003;63(2), 153-166.
McDougall AJ, McLeod JG. Autonomic nervous system function in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2003; 215(1-2):79-85.
40. Miller H, Simpson CA, Yeates WK: Bladder dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Br Med J. 1965; 1: 1265-9.
Porru, D., Campus, G., Garau, A., Sorgia, M., Pau, A. C., Spinici, G., & Usai, E. Urinary tract dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: is there a relation with disease-related parameters? Spinal Cord 1997; 35(1), 33.
De Carvalho FL, Gomes CM, Apostolos-Pereira SL, Bessa J Jr, Pinheiro M, Marchiori PE, Bruschini H, Srougi M, Callegaro D.Voiding dysfunction in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurourol Urodyn 2016; 35(1):39-43
De Almeida CR, Carneiro K, Fiorelli R, Orsini M, Alvarenga RMP. Urinary dysfunction in women with multiple sclerosis: analysis of 61 patients from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Neurology international 2013; 5(4).
Pintér Alexandra, Cseh Domonkos, Sárközi Adrienn, Illigens Ben M., Siepmann Timo,.Autonomic Dysregulation in Multiple SclerosisInt. J. Mol. Sci 2015; 16, 16920-16952;

Khalaf Kristin M., Coyne Karin S., Globe Denise R., Malone Daniel C., Armstrong Edward P., Vaishali Patel,1 and Jack Burks.The Impact of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 2016, 35:48–54

Table 1. The prevalence of symptoms of bladder dysfunction based on individual variables (age group, marital status, education, and occupation)

LUTS Variables		Lack of LUTS	Irritative (storage) symptoms	Obstructive (voiding) symptoms	Mixed symptoms	P
Sex	Total	95 (15.8)	154 (25.5)	39 (6.5)	315 (52.2)	0.022
	Female	73 (15.4)	133 (28.1)	26 (5.4)	242 (51.1(
	Male	22 (17.1)	21 (16.3)	13 (10.1)	73 (56.5)
Age group (year)	< 30	45 (23.8)	47 (24.9)	10 (5.3)	87 (46.0)	0.003
Age group (year)	> 30	50 (12.1)	107 (25.8)	29 (7.0)	228 (55.1)	0.003
Marital status	Single	35 (18.6)	40 (21.3)	9 (4.8)	104 (55.3)	0.168
Marital status	Married	60 (14.5)	114 (27.5)	30 (7.2)	211 (50.8)	0.168
Education level	Pre-high school degree	12 (8.3)	36 (24.8)	5 (3.4)	92 (63.4)	0.002
	high school degree	30 (14.0)	63 (29.4)	16 (7.5)	105 (49.1)
	College	53 (21.7)	55 (22.5)	18 (7.4)	118 (48.4)
Economic status	Poor	15 (9.9)	39 (25.7)	8 (5.3)	90 (59.2)	0.239
	Moderate	66 (17.1)	100 (25.8)	26 (6.7)	195 (50.4)
	Good	14 (21.9)	5 (23.4)	5 (7.8)	30 (46.9)
BMI (kg/m²)	< 18.5	5 (10.6)	57 (17.4)	26 (15.1)	7 (12.3)	0.866
	18.5-25	12 (25.5)	83 (25.4)	45 (26.2)	14 (24.6)
	25-30	2 (4.3)	23 (7.0)	12 (7.0)	2 (3.5)
	> 30	28 (59.6)	164 (50.2)	89 (51.7)	34 (59.6)

Data was presented as frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. P-values were derived from chi-square test.

LUTS: Lower urinary tract symptoms

Table 2. The prevalence of symptoms of bladder dysfunction based on clinical variables (duration of illness, Expanded Disability Status Scale, and type of multiple sclerosis)

LUTS Variables		Lack of LUTS	Irritative symptoms	Obstructive symptoms	Mixed symptoms	P
EDSS Class	Mild	85 (19.7)	122 (28.2)	35(8.1)	190 (44.0)	< 0.001
	Moderate	7 (4.6)	30 (19.9)	4(2.6)	110 (72.8)
	Severe	3 (15.0)	2 (10.0)	0.0(0.0)	15 (75.0)
Disease Duration (year)	< 5	45 (19.5)	70 (30.3)	16(6.9)	100 (43.3)	0.001
	5-10	35 (16.5)	54 (25.5)	16(7.5)	107 (50.5)
	> 10	15 (9.4)	30 (18.8)	7(4.4)	108 (67.5)
MS Type	CIS	9 (32.1)	9 (32.1)	3(10.7)	7 (25.0)	< 0.001
	RRMS	80 (17.4)	126 (27.5)	32(7.0)	221 (48.1)
	Progressive MS	6 (5.2)	19 (16.4)	4(3.4)	87 (75.0)

EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale;‎ MS: Multiple sclerosis; CIS: Clinically isolated syndrome; RRMS: Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Data was presented as frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. P-values were derived from chi-square test.

Table 3. Comparison of the mean scores of quality of life domains and physical and mental health composite dimensions of quality of life between the four groups with/without LUTS symptoms

QOL domains	NS (n = 95)	Mild (n = 260)	Moderate (n = 197)	Severe (n = 51)
QOL domains	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	P
Physical function	76.52 (27.66)	65.50 (30.18	47.56 (30.90)	37.15 (29.61)	< 0.001
Role limitations due to physical problems	64.21 (42.93)	50.08 (44.61)	26.14 (39.30)	18.62 (34.94)	< 0.001
Role limitations due to emotional problems	55.78 (47.00)	49.35 (46.63)	36.71 (45.22)	22.83 (41.01)	< 0.001
Pain	83.05 (21.10)	76.94 (23.18)	65.43 (27.04)	63.46 (28.50)	< 0.001
Emotional well-being	67.78 (17.93)	62.41 (19.40)	54.03 (21.06)	52.23 (19.02)	< 0.001
Energy	59.49 (18.52)	54.51 (20.28)	44.56 (19.58)	41.96 (20.79)	< 0.001
Health perceptions	63.31 (20.73)	58.25 (20.61)	49.44 (20.06)	47.45 (21.80)	< 0.001
Social function	82.01 (20.02)	79.16 (18.66)	65.35 (24.00)	56.53 (21.81)	< 0.001
Cognitive function	81.47 (20.84)	75.88 (24.54)	68.17 (26.98)	63.52 (26.36)	< 0.001
Health distress	76.31 (23.05)	73.44 (26.48)	60.07 (29.30)	56.86 (25.96)	< 0.001
Sexual function	80.21 (29.32)	70.02 (29.25)	55.96 (33.06)	55.55 (33.18)	< 0.001
Change in health	49.03 (29.37)	48.94 (28.69)	44.41 (29.56)	40.68 (28.70)	0.136
Satisfaction with sexual function	70.61 (31.38)	60.63 (32.06)	51.92 (36.91)	56.81 (34.96)	0.005
Overall QOL	72.61 (15.91)	67.21 (17.94)	58.24 (20.78)	53.65 (23.00)	< 0.001
Physical health composite score	71.08 (18.84)	65.15 (18.03)	50.11 (18.81)	47.03 (19.02)	< 0.001
Mental health composite score	69.02 (17.95)	63.76 (19.82)	53.60 (20.03)	48.25 (19.52)	< 0.001

QOL: Quality of life; SD: Standard deviation; NS: No LUTS symptoms;

P-values were derived from one-way ANOVA.

Table 4. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of patients with multiple sclerosis and urinary problems

Characteristic	Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)	P	Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)	P
Physical health composite dimensions of QOL	1.054 (1.032 to 1.077)	< 0.001	1.03 (0.996-1.07)	0.080
Mental health composite dimensions of QOL	1.034 (1.020 to 1.048)	< 0.001	1.008 (0.982-1.03)	0.540
Age (year)	0.937 (0.906 to 0.968)	< 0.001	0.98 (0.932-1.04)	0.640
Sex	1.186 (0.671 to 2.097)	0.550	2.61 (1.001-6.83)	0.050
BMI (kg/m²)	0.962 (0.907 to 1.020)	0.190	0.95 (0.86-1.04)	0.270
Marital status	0.520 (0.331 to 0.816)	0.004	1.29 (0.15-10.61)	0.810
Educational status	1.642 (1.181 to 2.283)	0.003	1.33 (0.80-2.21)	0.260
Disease duration (year)	0.922 (0.876 to 0.971)	0.002	1.01 (0.935-1.094)	0.770
EDSS	0.648 (0.546 to 0.768)	< 0.001	0.67 (0.485-0.93)	0.020
MS Type	0.782 (0.577 to 1.061)	0.110	1.33 (0.90-1.96)	0.140

QOL: Quality of life; EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale; MS: Multiple sclerosis

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 03 Jun, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Urology →

Editorial decision: Minor revision
27 Nov, 2019
Review #3 received at journal
19 Nov, 2019
Reviewer #3 agreed at journal
09 Nov, 2019
Review #1 received at journal
05 Aug, 2019
Review #2 received at journal
31 Jul, 2019
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
16 Jul, 2019
Reviewers invited by journal
11 Jul, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
11 Jul, 2019
Submission checks completed at journal
21 Jun, 2019
Editor invited by journal
31 May, 2019
Editor assigned by journal
31 May, 2019
First submitted to journal
30 May, 2019

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Evaluation of Quality of Life among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Tables

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1