3.1 Influence of the combination of die movements on the evolution of die wear
The multi-directional forging process of adapter is a complex, non-linear, time-varying rheological process. Combined with the characteristic parts of the adapter and the principle of the existing multidirectional die forging equipment, it is clear that the forging process can be divided into vertical and horizontal forging.In this paper, four schemes (as shown in Table 2) have been designed to study the evolution of the wear of the die carrying the saddle. The dies used in the four schemes are the same type of die, the difference lies in the sequence of movements of the top die and left and right punches and the combination of movements. The actual displacement of the top die is 54 mm and the actual displacement of the left and right punches is 27.17 mm, based on the dimensional requirements of the adapter and taking into account subsequent machining allowances.
Table 2
Different schemes for multidirectional die-forging of the adapter
Programme | Die movement sequence |
1 | The top die is moved until the end of the stroke and the left and right punches are moved until the forging is fully formed. |
2 | The left and right punches are moved until the end of the stroke, then the top die is moved until the forging is fully formed. |
3 | The left and right punches move to the designated position first, the top die starts to move until the end of the stroke, and the left and right punches move until the forging is fully formed. |
4 | The top die and the right and left punches move simultaneously according to the set stroke until the forging is fully formed. |
Figure 5 shows the distribution of die wear on the top die at the end of forging for the four scenarios. As can be seen from the figures below, the degree of wear on the top die varies in the four scenarios and the locations of the wear are not identical, but the greatest wear is found on the adapter face ring belt and is basically symmetrical in distribution. The top die of scenarios 2 and 4 have more wear in the adapter ring band area, followed by scenario 3 and scenario 1 has the least wear. The top and bottom closing of the dies in programme 1 is the first stage of movement. The metal flows mainly along the transverse direction under the extrusion of the top die. The left and right dies are not closed at this time, so there is a large sliding speed between the workpiece metal and the top die and the contact pressure is low, so the wear at this time is low at the saddle face ringband position. At the closing stage of the left and right dies (second stage of movement), the saddle face ringband section of the workpiece has been formed, at which point the metal flow capacity is reduced, the interface pressure increases and wear continues to increase. Programme 2 and 3 are both left and right dies first, during this process the metal flow of the workpiece is mainly in the vertical direction, when the top and bottom dies are closed, the flow of metal is restricted and the friction with the ring belt part of the top die increases, resulting in an increase in the interface pressure and a rise in the amount of wear. In programme 4, where the left and right pounches closing is carried out simultaneously with the top and bottom dies closing, the metal flow is similar to that of programme 2, where the metal flow is influenced by the cavities after the die closing and the increase in interfacial pressure leads to an increase in wear. From the perspective of maximum wear, it can be seen that Programme 2 has a maximum wear of 1.09E-05mm, which is the largest of the four programmes, and is approximately 1.43 times the maximum wear of Programme 1 (7.62E-06mm), Programme 3 (9.86E-06mm) has a maximum wear of approximately 1.29 times that of Programme 1, and Programme 4 (1.07E-05mm) has a maximum wear is approximately 1.4 times that of programme 1.
Figure 6 shows the maximum wear distribution of the left and right punches for the four programmes. It can be seen that the wear areas of programmes 1, 2 and 3 are very similar, and the wear areas of programme 4 are different from the first three programmes. From the location of the wear parts, the wear parts of the left and right punches also show a symmetrical distribution, with the larger wear parts being distributed on both sides of the die and decreasing towards the middle, which is related to the deformation of the metal. From the point of view of the amount of wear, the amount of die wear for the four programmes is increasing in order, with Programme 4 having the highest amount of wear, because the flow of metal in Programme 4 is restricted, with the top and bottom dies and the left and right dies extruding the workpiece at the same time, with the metal flowing vertically and horizontally in a staggered manner, so the value of die wear in Programme 4 is considerably higher than in all the other programmes, and the distribution of wear areas is more uneven.
In order to quantify more accurately the evolution of the die wear during hot forging of the adapter, 45 measurement points were taken along the adapter face annulus of the top die as shown in Fig. 7(b). Figure 7(c) shows the final results of the point trace of the selected measurement points for the four programmes at the end of the hot forging. It can be seen that the evolution of the wear volume is basically the same for all four programmes and is consistent with the distribution pattern shown in Figure (5): the wear areas are unevenly but symmetrically distributed. Overall, Programme 1 has the least amount of wear and tear and Programmes 2 and 4 have more. In all forging programmes, the maximum amount of wear occurs at point 14 and at the location of point 32. The reasons for this phenomenon have already been mentioned in the previous analysis and will not be repeated here. From the edge of the ring belt to the middle of the ring belt, the wear of the die tends to rise and then fall. An analysis of the forging process of the adapter shows that the flow of the metal of the workpiece is limited by the movement of the cavity and the convex die of the die. As a result, the relative sliding velocity between the workpiece metal and the cavity surface remains low in the hard-to-deform area, resulting in a smaller amount of cavity wear in this area. The middle part of the workpiece has less wear due to the restriction of the die cavity, where the metal flow capacity is also poor. As the largest part of the ring belt wear parts, combined with the forging process of the adapter can be seen, this part has been in contact with the workpiece, resulting in the workpiece has been in a large deformation state, the sliding friction brought about by the flow of the workpiece metal makes the interface pressure in a high state for a long time, the amount of die wear here has been increasing.
According to the previous analysis, the multi-directional die-forging solution of programme 1 has a lower amount of wear compared to the other programmes. Figure 8 gives the evolution of the wear of the die with the forging stroke and the distribution pattern on the forging process of the adapter in Programme 1. It can be seen that the wear of the top die expands gradually with the increase of the forging stroke. The main reason for this is that as the stroke increases, the contact area between the adapter part and the top die increases, the contact pressure between the workpiece and the die increases and the flow of metal in the adapter is impeded, leading to an increase in the wear of the top die. At the beginning of the forging stage, wear occurs first on the part of the top die that is in first contact with the workpiece, and increases with the amount of downward pressure, and the wear area begins to spread to the rest of the top die. After the forging process is completed, the top die wear areas are not evenly distributed, but show a roughly symmetrical distribution. The greatest wear is found on the left and right sides of the ring band of the top die (marked by the red line box), with minimal wear in the middle ring band.
The deformation level of 75% in the figure corresponds to the first stage of the adapter forging, i.e. the closing stage of the top and bottom dies, and it can be seen that the maximum wear on the top die is 7.52E-06 mm when the top and bottom dies are completed. The deformation degree of 100% corresponds to the entire forging process of the adapter has been completed. At this time, the maximum wear amount of the top die is 7.62E-06mm. Compared with the top and bottom dies closing stages, the wear amount of the top die in the second stage of forging increases by 1E-07mm. It can be seen that during the multi-directional forging process of the adapter, the wear of the die is mainly concentrated in the top and bottom closing stages, while the wear of the top die also increases in the left and right closing stages, the degree of die wear is much less than in the top and bottom closing stages.
Figure 9 shows the distribution of the wear pattern of the bottom die cavity during the forging of the adapter. Similar to the die wear pattern of the top die, the wear distribution of the bottom die is also basically symmetrical and unevenly distributed on one side. Analysis of the evolution law of the wear part of the bottom die shows that the wear part of the bottom die starts from the position of the bottom top block. With the increase of the pressing amount of the top die, the wear part gradually spreads to the position of the cavity of the bottom die, and the wear amount also increases. The maximum wear on the bottom die is 4.6E-06 mm when the top and bottom dies are closed and 5.32E-06 mm when the entire forging process of the adapter is completed. Compared to the top and bottom die closing stage, the wear on the bottom die during the left and right punches extrusion stage increases by 7.2E-07 mm, an increase of approximately 15.7% of the first stage. At the end of the forging, the greatest wear on the bottom die occurred in the shoulder area (marked by the red box), with a maximum wear value of 5.32 x 10 − 6 mm, while the maximum wear on the top die was 7.62E-06 mm, approximately 1.43 times the maximum wear on the cavities of the bottom die. Considering the structural schematic of the adapter shown in Fig. 1, the machining accuracy of the ring belt part of the adapter face is much greater than the machining accuracy of the rest of the parts, and the requirements for forging accuracy are very high. Therefore, considering all aspects, the amount of wear on the ring belt part of the top die is the key to the life of the forging die and the forming accuracy of the adapter forgings.
3.2 Influence of billet starting forging temperature on die wear distribution
In order to further investigate the effect of temperature on the amount of wear in the forging die of the adapter, the single variable method was used to set different gradients of the starting forging temperature Tw of the workpiece and the preheating temperature Td of the die respectively, as shown in Table 2, while the settings of the remaining parameters were kept in line with Table 1.
Table 2
Finite element simulation temperature gradient settings
Number | Tw (℃) | Td (℃) |
1 | 900,950,1000, 1050,1100 | 250 |
2 | 1000 | 150,200,250, 300,350 |
Figure 10 shows a three-dimensional surface plot of the wear values at the measurement points as a function of the initial forging temperature of the part. As can be seen from the figure, the maximum wear of the top die is negatively related to the starting forging temperature of the workpiece, the higher the starting forging temperature of the workpiece, the lower the maximum wear of the top die. As can be seen from the figure below, when the starting forging temperature is 1100°C, the maximum wear of the die is 7.91E-06 mm. When the starting forging temperature of the billet is 900°C, the maximum wear depth of the die on the adapter is 1.59E-05 mm, which is approximately 200% of the wear at 1100°C. This phenomenon is mainly related to the high temperature stress flow behaviour of the workpiece material. [35] The increase in the initial forging temperature of the workpiece effectively reduces the flow stress of the material, resulting in a reduction in the contact pressure between the adapter forging and the cavity surface of the die and a consequent reduction in the amount of wear, which is consistent with the trend shown in the figure.
As can be seen from Fig. 11, when the initial forging temperature of the workpiece increases from 900°C to 950°C, the maximum wear of the top die decreases by 15.7% and the sliding speed of the metal increases by 28.5%. The increased flow and filling capacity of the metal reduces the difficulty of forming the workpiece and reduces the resistance to forming. As the amount of pressure under the die increases, the interface pressure plays a dominant role in the friction between the workpiece and the die. The increase in the preheating temperature of the workpiece makes it easier for the metal to flow, resulting in a reduction in the interface pressure between the workpiece and the die and a reduction in the amount of die wear. Therefore, the following conclusion can be drawn: in the process of hot forging and forming of adapters, increasing the initial forging temperature of the forging can effectively reduce the amount of wear of the forging dies.
3.3 Influence of die preheating temperature on die wear distribution
In order to ensure the toughness of the die and reduce the risk of early service cracking, the hot extrusion dies are often preheated in actual production. If the preheating temperature is too low, the die material will not be tough enough and the difference between the surface temperature and the internal temperature will cause thermal stress when the die is in service. If the preheating temperature is too high, it will cause the die material to soften in advance, reducing the wear resistance of the surface and shortening the service life of the die. Figure 12 shows a graph of the amount of die wear correlation for different preheating temperatures of the die, it can be seen that the maximum wear of the top die basically shows a positive correlation with the preheating temperature of the die. As the preheating temperature of the die increases, the maximum wear of the top die also increases, which is the opposite of the influence of the initial forging temperature of the workpiece on the amount of die wear. However, when the preheating temperature of the die is increased from 300°C to 350°C, the wear of the die decreases instead. The friction and mutual heat transfer during the forging process lead to an increase in the surface temperature of the die. When the preheating temperature of the die is 300°C, the maximum temperature of the die surface reaches about 465°C, and when the preheating temperature is 350°C, the maximum temperature of the die surface reaches about 500°C. Combining the relationship between the hardness of the die material and the temperature shown in Fig. 4, it can be seen that the hardness of the die increases when the temperature of the die is between 400 and 500°C and therefore the wear of the top die decreases, with the trend shown in the figure.
In addition, the three-dimensional response surface plot in Fig. 13 shows that the maximum wear depth of the top die is 1.05E-05 mm when the preheating temperature of the die is 150°C. As the preheating temperature of the top die increases to 300°C, the maximum wear depth of the top die reaches 1.13E-05 mm, an increase of nearly 7.6% compared to the wear at a preheating temperature of 150°C. The reason for this phenomenon is that the change in die preheating temperature is related to the wear factor K(T) and the hardness factor H(T) of the die. According to Eq. (2) and Eq. (3), K(T) increases with increasing temperature and H(T) decreases with decreasing temperature. It can therefore be concluded that within a certain range, the amount of die wear increases as the preheating temperature of the die increases, but when the preheating temperature of the die exceeds a certain value, the hardness of the die material drops sharply resulting in a sharp increase in die wear. Therefore, from the point of view of reducing the amount of wear, the lower the preheating temperature of the die, the better. Furthermore, the effect of the preheating temperature on the die is less than the effect of the initial forging temperature on the amount of die wear.
Combining the simulation results with the quantitative analysis of the process parameters, the process parameters were optimised with the objective of reducing wear as follows: increasing the billet temperature is conducive to reducing the hardness of the billet, enhancing the fluidity of the billet metal and improving the quality of the filling, although it will cause the surface temperature of the die to rise but overall it will reduce the wear on the surface of the die. From the simulation results, high temperature workpiece should be selected as far as possible, provided that the heating temperature range of the workpiece is met. The simulation results show that the lower the preheating temperature the better it is for reducing wear, and as the preheating temperature rises the effect of increasing wear becomes more and more obvious.
The combined effect of the initial temperature of the workpiece (Tw) and the preheating temperature of the die (Td) on the wear of the die is given in Fig. 14. The overlap of the closed area formed by the parameters in the figure is the area of the optimal solution for the thermal parameters based on the minimum wear of the die. As can be seen from the figure, the optimal thermal parameter solution area is made up of six points, including three points at the start of the forging process and three points at the preheating temperature of the die. When the optimum range is chosen: Tw =1000 ~ 1100℃,Td =150 ~ 250℃ in the thermal parameters for hot forging and forming of forgings, the amount of wear in the die cavity can be effectively reduced. In addition, the figure shows that the amount of die wear during the forging of the adapter is more sensitive to changes in the starting forging temperature of the workpiece compared to the preheating temperature of the die.