Culture Selections and Compatibility study
Five PGPB strains Str-8 (Halomonas desiderata; GenBank accession no. JQ436849), Ldr-2 (Bacillus subtilis; GenBank accession no. JX996197), Fd-2 (Achromobacter xylosoxidans; GenBank accession no. JQ 975414), Art-7 (Burkholderia cepacia; GenBank accession no. KP 198544), Sd-6 (Brevibacterium halotolerans; GenBank accession no. NR042638) were obtained from Crop Protection Division, CSIR- Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow, India. Plant growth-promoting activities of these selected strains have been previously evaluated on various aromatic and medicinal crops (Barnawal et al. 2012; 2013; Maji et al. 2013; Bharti et al. 2015). These selected strains were further characterized for various plant growth-promoting activities such as ACC deaminase production, nitrogen fixation, solubilization of phosphates, IAA, and siderophore production. All the strains were checked for their compatibility with T. harzianum (US Patent No. 6475772).
In vitro testing was performed to determine the compatibility of all PGPBs with T. harzianum by following the method of Singh et al. (2019). Freshly prepared bacterial cultures (24 h old) were streaked at the periphery of a Petri plate, poured with {NA+PDA (1:1)} growth media, and incubated for 24 h at 26±2°C. After one day, 5 mm disc of T. harzianum (5 days old culture) was placed in the centre of the plate and further incubated at 26±2°C for 5 days. The absence of an inhibition zone indicated the compatibility between the bacterial and fungal strains. Each test was independently replicated four times.
Biofilm study
For in vitro biofilm study, compatible microbes were used for the crystal violet assay (Triveni et al.2012; Singh et al. 2019). Three ml of T. harzianum suspension (5 days old) and 5 ml of bacterial culture (2 days old) were mixed in 250 ml broth and incubated for 16 days at 30°C. Fungal-based bacterial biofilm was observed under an LCD microscope US3 model (BR Biochem Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd.) as per the procedure of Alexander (2009).
Preparation of bacterial and T. harzianum inoculums
PGPB strains and T. harzianum were grown separately in nutrient broth (24 h) and potato dextrose broth (7 days), respectively. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation (8,000 x g at 4° C for 10 min), washed thoroughly, and re-suspended in sterilized NaCl solution. The bacterial suspension’s CFU (colony forming unit) count was maintained at 3×108 ml-1 (Bharti et al. 2013). T. harzianum culture was filtered through cheeseclothinto a sterile glass bottle and suspended in sterile saline solution. The spore count has adjusted to approximately 3.0 x 108 spores ml–1.
Glasshouse experiment
The experiments in pots were conducted with O. sanctum cv CIM “Ayu” to assess the effect of selected PGPBs and T. harzianum, either alone or in various combinations, on the growth and secondary metabolite status of plants under saline conditions. Under glasshouse conditions, experiments were conducted in 20 cm tall and 20 cm internal diameter earthen pots filled with a mixture of soil: vermicompost {(3:1); 3 kg pot-1} in a completely randomized block design (CRBD) with 4 replications. Surface sterilization of roots of O. sanctum was done by dipping the roots in NaOCl (4%) for 1 minute, preceded by several washes with sterilized distilled water (SDW) several times. Before planting, roots were dipped for 30 min in microbial cultures, and the remaining culture (5 ml pot-1) was poured into the same pot (Maji et al. 2013). The potting mixture without inoculation served as a control (Bharti et al. 2013; Singh et al. 2019). Plantlets were inoculated with the same microbial cell suspension (3×108 CFU/ml) after 15 days. For pots in the glasshouse that were watered on a regular basis, a temperature of 28 ±2°C and a humidity of 50% were maintained.
Treatments applied were negative control (untreated non-salinized); Positive control (untreated salinized), T. harzianum (Th); Halomonas desiderata (Str-8); Bacillus subtilis (Ldr-2); Achromobacter xylosoxidans (Fd-2); Burkholderia cepacia (Art-7); Brevibacterium halotolerans (Sd-6); Th +Str-8; Th +Ldr-2; Th +Fd-2; Th+Sd-6; Th +Art-7. All the pots were watered three times a week with SDW for the first 15 days after inoculation of cultures and then periodically supplemented with NaCl (salt) solution at concentrations steadily increasing from 50 mM to 500 mM NaCl solution till harvesting. Plants were harvested after 90 days of planting. Negative control plants were not supplemented with saline solution (EC=0.587 mS at 20.5 °C).
Plant growth measurement, electrolyte leakage, and relative water content
Growth parameters like the height of the plant and herb weight (fresh), were recorded after the harvest. Electrolyte leakage and relative water content were also determined by following the methods of Hnilickova et al. (2019) and Medici et al. (2003), respectively.
Photosynthetic pigments
Chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were determined by previously described methods of Lichtenthaler and Buschmann (2001) and Singh et al. (2019). A UV-VIS Spectrophotometer (Spectra Max plus 384) was used to measure absorbance at 665.2, 662.4, and 470 nm.
Proline, Malondialdehyde (MDA), hydrogen peroxide, and sugar content
Proline content in the leaf was determined, as illustrated by Bates et al. (1973). The concentration of MDA, a lipid peroxidation product, was analyzed by the TBA method in leaf samples (Hodges 1999). To determine hydrogen peroxide content, fresh leaf tissues were extracted in TCA (0.5ml; 0.1%), and then centrifuged. H2O2 content was calculated as illustrated by Velikova et al. (2000). The total soluble sugar in leaf samples was determined as described previously by Irigoyen et al. (1992).
Antioxidant enzymatic activities
Leaf tissues were extracted in100 mM phosphate buffer (4 ml; pH: 7.2) using mortar and pestle, as Aroca et al. (2003) reported. After centrifugation (18000xg for 10 min at 4°C), the supernatant was used for evaluating enzyme activity.
Ascorbate Peroxidase (APX): The enzyme’s activity was assessed in a 1ml mixture of potassium phosphate buffer (100 mM; pH: 7.0), hydrogen peroxide (0.5 mM), Ascorbate (5 mM), and enzyme extract. To start the reaction, H2O2 was added, and the reduction in the absorbance was recorded at 290 nm for 1 min (Nakano and Asada 1981).
Catalase (CAT): For assessing the catalase activity method of Aebi (1984) was followed. The activity of CAT was determined by recording the decline in absorbance at 240nm in a reaction mixture containing 10 mM phosphate buffer, 150 mM hydrogen peroxide, and enzyme extract and calculating the rate of decomposition H2O2.
Total protein content: It was calculated using the Lowry et al. (1951) method, and Bovine Serum Albumin was used as a standard.
Total flavonoid and phenol content
Fresh leaves were extracted in 0.5 ml ethanol (80%) thrice and centrifuged. Supernatants were then pooled, and the total phenolic content was calculated using the Folin–Ciocalteu method, as previously reported by Zhang et al. (2006), using gallic acid as a standard. The total flavonoid content was measured using the aluminum chloride colorimetric method described by Chang et al. (2002) and quercetin as the standard.
Measurement of ACC level in the plant tissues
ACC concentrations in root samples were estimated by following Barnawal et al. (2012). Frozen leaf samples were extracted in 80% methanol (5ml) containing butylated hydroxytoluene (2 mg l−1) thrice and samples were pooled. After centrifugation (12000x g for 15 min at 4°C), the supernatants were combined and evaporated using a rotary evaporator. ACC level was estimated by gas chromatography as reported by Barnawal et al. (2012). The supernatant was mixed with 0.1 ml HgCl2 (80 mM) in vials and air tightened with rubber septa. Afterward, sodium hypochlorite solution (0.2 ml) was injected in the vials through septa, shaken well, and incubated for 8 minutes, and analyzed by gas chromatography for ethylene determination (Barnawal et al. 2012; 2013; 2014).
Foliar nutrient uptake
In air-dried samples, sodium, nitrogen, and phosphorous content were estimated by wet digestion with HNO3 + H2O2. The Kjeldahl method was used for nitrogen estimation (Singh et al. 2009). Flow Inject Analyzer (Foss FI- ASTAR 5000) was used for phosphorus and flame photometer for sodium estimation (Singh et al. 2009; 2019).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA method with IBM SPSS Statistics 20 software. Means and standard errors were determined for 4 replicate values, and means were compared using DMRT’s significance level under 0.05. The principal component analysis was applied using XLSTAT 2021.1.1 Addinsoft to reveal the correlation among treatments and parameters.