This study was a clinical trial, and the statistical population included all married women aged 18–45 years who were referred to health centers in Kerman, a city in the south of IRAN; to receive care and family planning counseling. Then convenience sampling was used for participations who were women under the coercion of spouses in contraception use according to WHO guidelines (refusal of specific contraceptive methods or insistence on a particular type of method or resistance to contraceptive counseling, history of repeated pregnancies, or request for a medical termination, and insistence on tubal ligation or insistence on reversal of tubal ligation) (14). Based on the available sampling, each woman who applied for a contraceptive was asked the WHO guideline questions, and if she was under the pressure of her husband to receive a contraceptive and met the inclusion criteria, she was selected. The purpose of the research was explained to her, and if she were satisfied and willing, she would enter the study.
Sample size: The sample size with a reliability of 1.96 and study power of 85% based on the results of the study by Nabavi et al. (2019) was approximately six people for each group, but 27 people were selected to increase the study capacity and compensate for the loss of samples (15).
Because the samples were divided into three groups, the final sample size was 81 people. The identified women were included in the study if they consented to participate and had the inclusion criteria. Then, all identified persons were randomly divided through a table of random numbers into three groups: control, psychoeducational counseling, and the IMB model.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Married women in Kerman aged between 18 and 45 who were the only spouse of their husbands and whose spouses were present in Kerman during the intervention, had at least one of the criteria for violence against women concerning contraceptive methods according to the checklist of the World Health Organization consented to participate in the study, were literate, had been married for at least one year, had no known mental illness, and had access to a smartphone (due to online education) and the ability to use it, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, absence in two sessions or more of the counseling sessions, and unwillingness to continue participation.
Research Tools
The research tool consisted of demographic information, a checklist for evaluating the contraception method requested by the spouse (World Health Organization), and a special researcher-made questionnaire on contraceptive methods and sexual satisfaction. This questionnaire was prepared based on scientific articles (16-19). The special sexual satisfaction questionnaire examined the contraceptive methods and sexual satisfaction with 48 items. The participants expressed their satisfaction with each item on a five-point Likert scale. The questionnaire was sent to expert professors to assess its validity, and the content validity was also determined quantitatively and qualitatively to determine the content validity of the questionnaire. The content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) were 0.93 and 0.98, respectively, and face validity was confirmed using experts' opinions. The questionnaire was then presented to 30 people from the target group to determine its face validity; then, internal consistency was determined using Cronbach's α (0.855).
Research Implementation
First, the study's objectives were explained to women who met the inclusion criteria, and, if they wished to participate, written informed consent was obtained from them. All three groups completed the questionnaire on sexual satisfaction, specific contraception methods, and contraception type before the intervention, immediately after, and one month after the intervention. The study's objectives were first fully explained to participants to prevent information exchange between group members. Introduction sessions were held separately for each group. Given that information exchange is possible in cyberspace, to prevent information exchange between participants, after dividing them into three groups (control, psychoeducational, and IMB), a time interval of 2 months was considered for each group. First, a pre-test was completed for the control group, and post-tests were done one month later and one month after the initial post-test. Then a pre-test was done for the psychoeducational group; the initial post-test was done after the three virtual counseling sessions in Skyroom; the final post-test was completed one month after the intervention. The total time spent implementing the intervention and completing the questionnaires was six months. In the control group, the clinic midwife provided all routine training. In the intervention group, psychoeducational counseling sessions were held according to a unique package of counseling sessions in three 90-minute online sessions one week apart. In the IMB model intervention group, counseling sessions were held according to a specific package, in 4 online sessions, 120–190 minutes each two sessions per week, and all these sessions were held by the same person (the researcher). Finally, immediately after the intervention and one month later, the participants in the three groups completed the questionnaire in the three groups. The psychoeducational counseling and IMB program packages were designed, prepared, and implemented using various resources (Table 1).
Table 1: psychoeducational counseling content and information–motivation–behavioral model
session
|
Objective
|
Content
|
psychoeducational counseling package
|
First
|
Introduction and awareness
|
Informing people about violent behaviors, teaching contraception methods
|
Second
|
Identifying sexual misconceptions
|
Teaching to improve sexual relations, expressing the importance of sex, talking about sexual misconceptions, extensive training on contraception methods
|
Third
|
Effective communication and assertiveness
|
Assertiveness skill training, communication styles, effective communication skills training
|
information–motivation–behavioral package
|
First
|
Identifying distorted dimensions in sex
|
Defining contraception methods and the benefits and harms of each method, defining spousal violence in contraception, defining sexual satisfaction and sexual satisfaction related to contraception.
|
Second
|
Motivational dialogue
|
Conducting a motivational interview to accept or change the contraception method to make it voluntary and increase sexual satisfaction
|
Third
|
Efficient sexual dialogue with the spouse
|
Improving perceived individual skills and self-efficacy
|
Fourth
|
Activate assertive behaviors
|
Activating avoidance behaviors and improving assertiveness skills by increasing motivation and behavioral skills
|
Data Analysis
216 people were surveyed to participate in the study, of which 135 were either not eligible or unwilling to participate in the study. 81 people were included in the study. By lot, they were divided into 3 groups (one was a control group and two were intervention groups). Since the intervention was performed online and offline, we did not have any sample drop and finally the analysis was performed on 81 people. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 22. Quantitative variables were described by mean and standard deviation, and qualitative variables were defined by frequency and frequency percentage. Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to evaluate the normality of dependent variables (sexual satisfaction and changes in contraceptive methods). Due to the abnormality of data distribution, the Friedman test was used to examine the trend of changes. The nonparametric equivalent of one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, was used for comparison.