Resistance training relieves skeletal muscle atrophy induced by hypoxia via the Akt- FoxO1-MuRF1/Atrogin-1 signaling pathway

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1601629/v1

Abstract

Purpose This study investigated the effects of resistance training at continuous hypoxia in rat skeletal muscles, with a focus on the modulation of Forkhead box protein O1 (FoxO1) signaling by protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) in this process.

Methods In an intervention experiment, male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to simulated hypoxia and subjected to resistance training for four weeks. The biceps of forelimb and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle were isolated for histological observation and biochemical analysis. L6 rat myoblasts were differentiated into myotubes in the cell culture experiment and then subjected to hypoxic conditions with the addition of an Akt activator. The cells were harvested to observe their morphology and determine the expression level of FoxO1 and downstream signaling molecules.

Results Morphological observation showed the wet weight of the EDL and biceps of the upper limb was significantly higher in the hypoxia-training (HR) group than in the hypoxia (H) group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05). Resistance training significantly enhanced Akt expression and FoxO1 phosphorylation (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05) in skeletal muscle. In myotubes activated Akt under 1% O2 conditions, FoxO1 phosphorylation at S256 was up-regulated, while expression of MuRF1 and Atrogin-1 was reduced (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05).

Conclusion Resistance training alleviated skeletal muscle atrophy induced by hypoxia, in which FoxO1 phosphorylated by Akt at the S256 position and down-regulation of E3 ligase MuRF-1 and Atrogin-1 in skeletal muscle.

1. Introduction

It is well known that long-term exposure to hypoxia leads to a decrease of skeletal muscle strength and exercise performance. Early studies on mountaineering reported adaptive changes in skeletal muscle at high altitude environments including a loss of lean body mass, decreased skeletal muscle cross section area (CSA), and motor dysfunction [1]. Alternations in protein metabolism stimulated by hypoxia have been implicated as a major mechanism of muscle wasting. Hypoxia stimulation alters the balance between protein synthesis and protein degradation leading to acceleration in the rate of protein breakdown. A detailed understanding of the signaling pathway involved in skeletal muscle protein breakdown is therefore essential for developing strategies aimed at preventing muscle atrophy and improving exercise performance.

The Forkhead box protein O (FoxO) family is the control switch that regulates the transcription of various genes involved in metabolism [2, 3], cell apoptosis [4], DNA repair [5] and protein degradation [6]. FoxO1 is a member of this family that has been studied because it participates in differentiation of mammalian cells. FoxO1 expression is found to be a negative regulatory factor of type I muscle fibers and leads to impaired skeletal muscle function [7]. In addition, FoxO1 is involved in regulation of muscle proteolysis. Researchers used dexamethasone to construct a model of skeletal muscle atrophy and showed that Akt/FoxO1 was the upstream regulation factor of E3 ligase [8]. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) primarily regulates protein degradation in mammalian cells. The protein to be broken down is labeled by ubiquitin through E3 ligase, and then the protein substrate is targeted by 26S proteasome. Studies have shown that muscle-specific E3 ligase exists in skeletal muscle, including muscle atrophy F-box (MAFbx or Atrogin-1) and muscle ring finger 1 (MuRF1) which are sensitive to changes in skeletal muscle atrophy[9].Activation of the myostatin /TGF-βsignaling pathway after immobilization or denervation promotes the expression of Atrogin-1 and MuRF-1 [10]. Research on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) suggests that FoxO1 may be the key for protein degradation induced by anoxia [11].

It has been reported that Akt (protein kinase B) plays an important role in muscle protein synthesis and degradation. FoxO1 is a downstream target of Akt and has three highly conserved phosphorylation sites (Thr24, Ser 256 and Ser319). Skeletal muscle atrophy is associated with down-regulation of Akt induces the transcription of FoxOs and muscle specific E3 ubiquitin ligases [12]. It is known that exercise can regulate muscle protein synthesis by hormones and transcription factors. Resistance training aggravates skeletal muscle sufficiently and improves testosterone and IGF-1 expression to activate Akt [13]. Akt activation, in turn, inhibits FoxOs function and promotes its movement from the nucleus towards the cytosol, thereby effecting downward regulation factors. Furthermore, Atrogin-1 and MuRF-1 expression is known to be related to FoxO1 phosphorylation. Recent study shows the possibility that up-regulation of Akt and FoxOs phosphorylation may alleviate skeletal muscle atrophy induced by food deprivation [14]. However, there is a lack of research to clarify how Akt-FoxO1 regulates muscle protein balance under hypoxic conditions during resistance training. The current study is the first to establish a rat model of resistance training and hypoxia that can be used to investigate the regulatory role of Akt-FoxO1 in skeletal muscle protein under these conditions.

2. Materials And Methods

2.1 Animals and ethics statement

The study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee at Beijing Sport University. 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats (8 weeks of age) were housed at 22–25℃and 12-h light-dark cycles, with food and water available ad libitum. The animals were divided randomly into four groups and weighed once every day: control group (C group, n = 10), resistance training group (R group, n = 10), hypoxia group (H group, n = 10) and hypoxia resistance training group (HR group, n = 10).

2.2 Hypoxic intervention and resistance training (RT)

The rats in the H and HR groups lived in normobaric hypoxia condition that simulated the environment at a height of 4000m (12.4%O2). The C and R groups acted as controls and were housed in a normal oxygen environment. The rats in the R group trained in a normal environment while the HR group trained in a hypoxic room. We designed and made a 1.2m ladder with a 1 cm grid, which was inclined at 85° against the wall during training. The R and HR groups pre-trained for a week to familiarize them with the climbing ladder. Weights were placed in a Corning tube, with small iron balls and a hook, attached to the tail root of the rat by a rubber belt (Fig. 1B). The rats were trained to climb from the bottom to the top in 10s by gentle stimulation on their tails. The initial load was 50% of their body weight and was increased 10% every other day throughout the 4 weeks of the training period.

Table 1

Training load of R and HR groups 

Day

R group load

HR group load

1

121 g

115 g

3

153 g

145 g

5

188 g

177 g

7

217 g

196 g

9

257 g

234 g

11

294 g

272 g

13

323 g

310 g

15

376 g

353 g

17 ~ 28

422–485 g

395–442 g


2.3 Body composition, muscle wet weight and cross-sectional area (CSA)

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was used to measure the body composition of the rats. 48 h after the last training session, the animals were anesthetized with 3% pentobarbital sodium (3 ml/kg body weight). Parameters measured in the test included body weight, lean body mass, fat mass and the percentage of lean body mass. The rats were sacrificed by drawing blood from the abdominal aorta after the DEXA test. The extensor digitorum longus (EDL), soleus, gastrocnemius and bicipital muscle of forelimb were isolated quickly and weighed, followed by fixation of the muscle in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 ℃. The tissue specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) according to standard protocols and the CSA of each muscle analyzed using Image J software.

2.4 Cell culture experiment

Rat L6 skeletal muscle cells were purchased from ScienCell library. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Gibco. The cells were cultured at 37℃ in high glucose DMEM (10% FBS, penicillin 100 U/ml, and streptomycin 0.1 mg/ml ) at 5% CO2. When the cells had grown to a confluence of 80–90%, the DMEM was supplemented with 2% equine serum, followed by incubation for a further 7–8 days to induce the cells to differentiate into myotubes. The differentiated myotubes were then transferred to a hypoxia chamber (Smarter 118 hypoxia system) maintained at 1% O2, 5% CO2 and 94% N2 for a further 6 h. 1, 3-Dicaffeoylquinic acid is an effective activator of the PI3K/Akt pathway, was added to the medium of the Akt-Act group and regulated to a final concentration at 50µM/L.

2.5 Immunohistochemistry and imaging

Paraffin sections of the skeletal muscle were dewaxed and repaired using citric acid antigen repair buffer. Fluorescence quenching agent was then added dropwise onto the tissue section. After washing in PBS, the sections were incubated overnight in FoxO1-S256 antibody (1:100 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, USA). The sections were then incubated with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h in a dark room. The nucleus was stained with DAPI. L6 cells were grown on glass coverslips and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, followed by washing in PBS and incubation in goat serum for 30 min. The next steps were similar to those used for the tissue sections. The images were captured by laser scanning confocal microscopy and merged with NIS-Elements D image analysis software.

2.6 Western Blotting

EDL and arm biceps muscles from at least six rats tissue were dissected and frozen in a -80℃ ultra cold storage freezer. Total protein was abstracted using RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) supplemented with protease inhibitor and phosphatase inhibitor (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). 30 mg of tissue was crushed using beads suspended in in homogenizer system (Eppendorf, Hamburg Germany) in 300 µl of RIPA buffer at 4℃ for 5 min. The samples were then centrifuged (12000 rpm, 10 min,4℃) and the supernatant isolated. L6 myotubes grown in six wells plates were washed with ice DPBS, followed by drop-wise addition of RIPA buffer into the wells and then left to stand for five minutes. The cell fraction was scraped from the bottom of plate situated in an ice bath and then centrifuged at 12000 rpm at 4 ℃ for 10 min. The protein concentration was measured using a bicinchonininc acid (BCA) kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A 20 µg aliquot of protein of each sample was subjected to SDS-PAGE (4–12% Bis-Tris gel, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and then transferred onto PVDF membrane (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The tailored membranes were then immunoblotted with primary antibodies: PI3K, (1:1000 dilution, Proteintech, Chicago, USA ); Akt (1:1000 dilution, Abcam, Cambridge, UK); FoxO1 (1:500 dilution, Abcam); FoxO1 (S256) (1:1000 dilution, Cell Signaling Technology); MuRF1 (1:2000 dilution, Abcam); Atrogin-1 (1:1000 dilution, Abcam); β-Actin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), and Tubulin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology).

2.7 Antibodies and instruments

PI3K P110 (Alpha) antibody (20583-1-AP) was purchased from Proteintech. Anti-pan-AKT antibody (ab8805), anti-FOXO1 antibody (ab52857), anti-Fbx32 antibody (ab74023), anti-MuRF1 antibody (ab172479) and anti-fast myosin skeletal heavy chain antibody (ab91506) were purchased from Abcam. Phospho-FoxO1(Ser256) antibody (#9461), β-actin (#4970) and α-tubulin antibody (#2144) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. A resistance training ladder was designed and made by our group (Patent number: 201521113887.1).1, 3-dicaffeoylquinic acid was used as the Akt activator and was purchased from MCE (New Jersey, USA).

2.8 Statistical analysis

Images of the immunohistochemistry sections were analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software. The CSA analyses were carried out using Image. J. All values were expressed as mean ± SD. One- or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the effects, in the various experiments. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1 Results of rat body composition after hypoxia and exercise intervention

Table 2 shows the effect of continuous hypoxia exposure and ladder climbing resistance training on the body composition of the rats. Body weight and muscle mass in the H group were significantly lower than in the C group (341.20 ± 16.75 vs. 377.5 ± 10.75 and 226.83 ± 8.33 vs. 260.50 ± 9.35, respectively P < 0.05). Muscle mass was significantly higher in the HR group than in the H group (246.17 ± 4.71 vs. 226.83 ± 8.33, P < 0.05).

Table 2

Results of rat body composition

 

Body Weight (g)

Muscle mass (g)

Fat (g)

Muscle%

Control Group (C, n = 10)

377.5 ± 10.75

260.50 ± 9.35

108.33 ± 18.04

69.19 ± 4.67

Resistance Group (R, n = 10)

376.17 ± 16.87

272.83 ± 6.48

97.33 ± 10.01

72.54 ± 2.09

Hypoxia Group (H, n = 10)

341.20 ± 16.75*

226.83 ± 8.33*

105.67 ± 5.32

67.08 ± 2.55

Hypoxia-Resistance training group (HR, n = 10)

348.80 ± 11.30α

246.17 ± 4.71༆α

93.5 ± 7.79

70.90 ± 1.24

*H group compared with C group, P < 0.05; & HR group compared with H group, P < 0.05

3.2 Wet weight of skeletal muscle

The wet weight of the rat soleus, gastrocnemius, EDL, and forelimb biceps after intervention are shown in Table 3, while Fig. 2 shows the morphological differences in skeletal muscle after hypoxia and resistance training. The wet weight of the EDL and forelimb biceps of the HR group were significantly higher than those in the H group by 6.7% and 7.5% respectively (153.50 ± 6.12 mg vs. 143.83 ± 7.85 mg P < 0.05, 182.17 ± 7.73 mg vs. 169.17 ± 7.28 mg, respectively, P < 0.05).

Table 3

The wet weight of EDL, soleus, gastrocnemius and forelimb biceps

 

Soleus(mg)

Gastrocnemius(g)

EDL(mg)

Biceps(mg)

Control group (C, n = 10)

152.17 ± 9.97

1.94 ± 0.09

165.33 ± 10.59

170.50 ± 6.56

Resistance group (R, n = 10)

168.67 ± 7.71^

1.89 ± 0.17

173.50 ± 8.02

184.67 ± 10.56^

Hypoxia group (H, n = 10)

132.00 ± 8.10*

1.73 ± 0.14*

143.83 ± 7.85*

169.17 ± 7.28

Hypoxia-Resistance training group (HR, n = 10)

131.83 ± 8.66α

1.74 ± 0.11

153.50 ± 6.12

182.17 ± 7.73&

3.3 Cross section area (CSA) of skeletal muscle fibers

As shown in Table 4, the CSA measurements of the gastrocnemius, EDL and forelimb biceps in the H group were significantly lower than in the C group (11.55 ± 1.70 vs. 14.17 ± 2.23 P < 0.05, 12.40 ± 1.34 vs. 15.01 ± 2.06 P < 0.05, 12.35 ± 1.54 vs. 16.97 ± 1.66 P < 0.05, respectively). The CSA of forelimb biceps of the HR group was obviously higher than in the H group (15.02 ± 2.29 vs. 12.35 ± 1.54, P < 0.05), while the CSA of the EDL in the HR group was significantly lower than in the HR group (13.90 ± 1.96 vs. 16.00 ± 2.17 P < 0.05).

Table 4

CSA of skeletal muscle (Unit: 100×mm2).

 

Soleus

Gastrocnemius

EDL

Biceps

Control Group (C, n = 10)

15.72 ± 1.55

14.17 ± 2.23

15.01 ± 2.06

16.97 ± 1.66

Resistance Group (R, n = 10)

16.02 ± 1.89

15.02 ± 1.76

16.00 ± 2.17

17.07 ± 2.57

Hypoxia Group (H, n = 10)

14.25 ± 1.38

11.55 ± 1.70*

12.40 ± 1.34*

12.35 ± 1.54*

Hypoxia-resistance training group (HR, n = 10)

13.60 ± 1.46

13.08 ± 2.99

13.90 ± 1.96α

15.02 ± 2.29

* H compared with C. P < 0.05, & HR compared with H P < 0.05, α HR compared with R P < 0.05

3.4 Analysis results of FoxO1 (S256) protein in soleus, EDL and forelimb biceps

As shown in Fig. 3 and Table 3, there were significant differences in the immunofluorescence reaction of the FoxO1 (S256) protein in the rat soleus, EDL and forelimb biceps among the four groups of rats. Regardless of the soleus, EDL or biceps in the HR group, the level of FoxO1 (S256) expression was higher than in the control group (P < 0.01). The level of FoxO1 (S256) expression of the EDL in the H group was significantly lower than in the C group (P < 0.05). Significant differences in the level of FoxO1 (S256) expression were observed in the EDL and biceps between the HR and H groups (P < 0.05).

Table 5

Analysis results of FoxO1 (S256) integral optical density (IOD)

 

Soleus

EDL

Biceps

Control group

3.26 ± 0.27

8.91 ± 0.08

8.48 ± 0.45

Resistance training group

7.15 ± 0.69^^**

12.02 ± 4.94^^**

10.95 ± 1.97^^**

Hypoxia group

3.83 ± 1.13

6.56 ± 1.52§

7.29 ± 1.12

Hypoxia-resistance training group

4.21 ± 0.65αα

8.75 ± 1.29&

9.35 ± 1.07&

^^ indicates comparison between HR group with C group, P < 0.01, & indicates comparison between HR group and H group, P < 0.05, ** indicates comparison between R group and H group, P < 0.01, § indicates comparison between H group and C group P < 0.05, ααindicates comparison between HR group and R group.

3.5 Relative expression level of MCH, Akt, FoxO1, FoxO1(S256), Atrogin-1 and MuRF-1 in proteins skeletal muscle

The results of the Western blotting tests are shown in Fig. 4. The relative expression level of myosin heavy chain (MHC) protein in the EDL of H group was significantly lower than in the C group (P < 0.05). The relative expression level of FoxO1 (S256) protein in the EDL and biceps in the HR group was significantly higher than in the H group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). In the R group, the relative expression level of Akt in the EDL and biceps was significantly higher than that measured in the C group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01). Akt relative expression level in the biceps of the HR group was significantly higher than in the H group (P < 0.05). The relative expression level of FoxO1 in the EDL and biceps were both significantly higher in the H group than that measured in C group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively). Significantly lower relative expression level of FoxO1 in the EDL and biceps was observed in the HR group compared to that observed in the H group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Atrogin-1 relative expression in the EDL and biceps in the H group was significantly higher than in the C group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). Atrogin-1 relative expression level in the EDL in the HR group was significantly lower than H group (P < 0.01). The H group had a significantly higher relative expression level of MuRF-1 in the EDL and biceps than that measured in C group (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). The relative expression level of MuRF-1 in the EDL of the HR group was significantly lower than that observed in the H group (P < 0.01).

3.6 Activated Akt promotes FoxO1 phosphorylation and alleviated myotubes atrophy.

As shown in image (A), exposure to 1% O2 in the cultures induced rat L6 myotubes atrophy (A2). An IF image of FoxO1 (S256) in myotubes at 1% O2 showed that FoxO1 (S256) extra nuclear expression was lower than that observed at normal oxygen concentrations (A5 and A4). Akt activation alleviated myotube atrophy at 1% O2 (A3). The fluorescence intensity of FoxO1 (S256) outside the extra nucleus in Akt-Act group was higher than that observed in the H group (A6 and A5). MHC relative expression in Akt-Act cells was significantly higher than that measured in hypoxia cells (P < 0.01). The relative protein expression results showed that activation of Akt suppressed FoxO1, Atrogin-1 and MuRF1 expression during hypoxia (Figs. C-E: P < 0.05, P < 0.05 and P < 0.05). In contrast, FoxO1 (S256) relative expression in Akt-Act cells was significantly higher than in hypoxia cells (P < 0.05).

4. Discussion

4.1 Effects of resistance training on skeletal muscle during residence in hypoxia

The morphological results of the current study showed that continuous exposure to hypoxia causd skeletal muscle loss, whereas regular resistance exercises during exposure alleviated muscle atrophy. The molecular mechanism of this process is related to an imbalance between decomposition and synthesis of muscle protein [15, 16]. Recent studies suggested that resistance ladder training blunted the skeletal muscle degradation of hindlimb immobilized rats [17] and age-induced accumulation of connective tissue [18]. There is also evidence that morphological and neuromuscular adaptions can be achieved by high intensity resistance under hypoxia [19]. This process is related to skeletal muscle remodeling. Other evidence suggests that skeletal muscle may lose volume in response to a variety of stimuli such as denervation, suspension fixation and hypoxia. This process is related to protein synthesis and degradation pathways [20, 21].

4.2 Akt-FoxO1-E3 signaling pathway and skeletal muscle atrophy in hypoxia

FoxO is a family of transcription factors which regulate various biological processes in mammalian cells. FoxO1 is one of these factors and regulates cell differentiation, survival, metabolism and has been reported to regulate muscle fiber type transformation and proteolysis [22] [23]. On the other hand, FoxO1 also induces skeletal muscle atrophy by upregulating the expression of the E3-ubiquitine ligase [24]. while another study found that MuRF1 and Atrogin-1 are E3 ligases specifically expressed in skeletal muscle with direct protein polyubiquitination targeting them for proteolysis by the 26S proteasome. It has been reported that atrogin-1 gene knock-out mice have reduced skeletal muscle atrophy induced by denervation [10]. Chiel C et al. showed that muscle atrophy induced by hypoxia is related to the E3 ligases MuRF1 and Atrogin-1 [25]. In addition, another study found that movement type and muscle contraction had different effects on the transcription MuRF1 and Atrogin-1 [26]. For example, the expression of Atrogin-1 in skeletal muscle was shown to be down-regulated after one 6–12 h period of resistance training [25, 27]. The current study demonstrated that for the first time that four-week exposure to a simulated 4000 m (12.4% O2) normobaric hypoxia (12.4% O2) environment induced rats skeletal muscle atrophy in rats, accompanied by up-regulation of FoxO1, Atrogin-1, and MuRF-1. Similar results were reported in a human study that showed eight weeks of muscle atrophy de-training resulted in a decrease in phospho-Akt and an increase of FoxO1 [28]. The results of our study confirmed that resistance training alleviated muscle atrophy induced by hypoxia and that muscle protein breakdown regulated by Akt-FoxO1 played an important role in this process. Yin et al. reported that muscular atrophy in patients with end-stage renal disease was also associated with up-regulation of FoxO1, Atrogin-1 and MuRF-1 [29]. Waddell et al. demonstrated using immunoprecipitation that FoxO1 binds to the MuRF1 promoter in C2C12 myotubular cells, a result that indicates that FoxO1 transcription factor plays a regulatory role in MuRF1 transcription in skeletal muscle [30].

Akt (protein kinase B) has been shown to activate mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) and downstream effectors, with exercise inducing Akt expression and activation in skeletal muscle [31]. In the current study, we showed that regular resistance training induced an increase in Akt expression and production of FoxO1, Atrogin-1 and MuRF-1 in skeletal muscle during hypoxia. A recent study also suggested that aerobic training and resistance training both safely alleviated skeletal muscle atrophy by activating the PI3K/Akt pathway [32]. Regardless of the type of skeletal muscle fiber, ladder resistance training affects skeletal muscle mass by modulating the Akt-FoxO3a pathway [33]. Gombos developed an overload model by removing the synergistic muscles (i.e. gastrocnemius, soleus) of the plantaris muscle in rats which resulted in stimulation of plantaris hypertrophy, associated with increased Akt and suppressed FoxO1 levels [34]. Taken together, these results indicate that Akt activation is the key to inhibiting skeletal muscle atrophy. In our in vitro study were observed using microscopy that 1% hypoxia in cultures induced myotube atrophy, while the results of Western blot tests suggested that exposure to hypoxia induced a decrease in MHC and Akt expression and an increase in FoxO1, MuRF-1 and Atrogin-1 expression in L6 myotubes. These results provide evidence that the Akt-FoxO1-E3 signaling pathway regulates skeletal muscle atrophy induced by hypoxia.

4.3 Phosphorylation of FoxO1 at S256 regulates skeletal muscle atrophy

The activity of FoxO1 is regulated by various post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation, acetylation and ubiquitination [35]. An early study suggested that S256 is an important phosphorylation site in FoxO1 which is an Akt-dependent target that suppresses FoxO1 activity [36]. The S256 site in FoxO1 is a switch to bind 14-3-3 dimers and promote nuclear export. It has been reported that Akt-overexpression in mouse islet cells stimulated FoxO1 phosphorylation at S256 and exerted beneficial effects on beta cells [36]. In the current study, it was obvious that hypoxia exposure inhibited FoxO1 phosphorylation at S256 in skeletal muscle. IF images showed that resistance training stimulated an increase in FoxO1 (S256) expression in the cytoplasm. In vitro, activation of Akt has also been shown to alleviate myotube atrophy during hypoxia, accompanied by an increase in FoxO1 (S256) expression. These results show that resistance training stimulates Akt expression and FoxO1 phosphorylation at S256 in muscle cells.

5 Conclusion

In conclusion, we have established a rat model of resistance training involving ladder climbing that alleviated skeletal muscle atrophy induced by hypoxia. Morphological results showed that four-weeks of exposure to hypoxia resulted in a decrease in muscle mass and CSA. During muscle atrophy, expression of Akt and FoxO1 (S256) decreased, while the expression of FoxO1, MuRF1 and Atrogin-1 increased. In comparison, resistance training every other day effectively reduced this atrophy and stimulated rat biceps and EDL hypertrophy, while Akt and FoxO1 (S256) expression was increased in the group to a greater extent than that observed with hypoxia resistance training. An In vitro study showed that activation of Akt lead to FoxO1 phosphorylation at the S256 site and also inhibited the expression of MuRF1 and Atrogin-1. These results indicate that the Akt-FoxO1 pathway plays an important role in regulating muscle protein during resistance training under hypoxic conditions. Akt activation leads to the nuclear exclusion of phosphorylated FoxO1, which is an important mechanism by which resistance training alleviates muscle atrophy.

Declarations

Funding

This study was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771317). 

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author Contributions

Jiabei Yu and Yang Hu conceived and designed research. Jiabei Yu, Yanchun Li,Tianyu Han, Rongxin Zhu and Pengyu Fu conducted experiments. Jiabei Yu and Yang Hu analyzed data. Jiabei Yu wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the nature of this funding but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics Approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Sports University (Date 2018.12.20 /No. 20180013).

References

  1. Botombekova AB and Zhumaliev A (1977) [Resistance of the skeletal muscles and the myoglobin content in them in high-mountain acclimatized and low-mountain readapted white rats]. Zdravookhr Kirg:31-4.
  2. Ma J, Matkar S, He X and Hua X (2018) FOXO family in regulating cancer and metabolism. Semin Cancer Biol 50:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.01.018
  3. Unterman TG (2018) Regulation of Hepatic Glucose Metabolism by FoxO Proteins, an Integrated Approach. Curr Top Dev Biol 127:119-147. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2017.10.005
  4. Yang YJ, Xu HW and Dai Q (2008) [Progress in regulation of FoxO on cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis]. Sheng Li Ke Xue Jin Zhan 39:362-5.
  5. Obsil T and Obsilova V (2011) Structural basis for DNA recognition by FOXO proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1813:1946-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.11.025
  6. Huang H and Tindall DJ (2011) Regulation of FOXO protein stability via ubiquitination and proteasome degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1813:1961-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.007
  7. Kamei Y, Miura S, Suzuki M, Kai Y, Mizukami J, Taniguchi T, Mochida K, Hata T, Matsuda J, Aburatani H, Nishino I and Ezaki O (2004) Skeletal muscle FOXO1 (FKHR) transgenic mice have less skeletal muscle mass, down-regulated Type I (slow twitch/red muscle) fiber genes, and impaired glycemic control. J Biol Chem 279:41114-23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400674200
  8. Son YH, Jang EJ, Kim YW and Lee JH (2017) Sulforaphane prevents dexamethasone-induced muscle atrophy via regulation of the Akt/Foxo1 axis in C2C12 myotubes. Biomed Pharmacother 95:1486-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.09.002
  9. Rom O and Reznick AZ (2016) The role of E3 ubiquitin-ligases MuRF-1 and MAFbx in loss of skeletal muscle mass. Free Radic Biol Med 98:218-230. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.12.031
  10. McFarlane C, Plummer E, Thomas M, Hennebry A, Ashby M, Ling N, Smith H, Sharma M and Kambadur R (2006) Myostatin induces cachexia by activating the ubiquitin proteolytic system through an NF-kappaB-independent, FoxO1-dependent mechanism. J Cell Physiol 209:501-14. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20757
  11. Pomies P, Blaquiere M, Maury J, Mercier J, Gouzi F and Hayot M (2016) Involvement of the FoxO1/MuRF1/Atrogin-1 Signaling Pathway in the Oxidative Stress-Induced Atrophy of Cultured Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Myotubes. PLoS One 11:e0160092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160092
  12. Léger1 B, Cartoni1 R, Praz1 M, Lamon1 S, Dériaz1 O, Crettenand1 A, Gobelet1 C, Rohmer2 P, Konzelmann1 M, Luthi1 F and Russell1 AP (2006) Akt signalling through GSK-3&#x003b2;,mTOR and Foxo1 is involved in human skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy. Journal of Physiology:923-933.
  13. Ochi E, Ishii N and Nakazato K (2010) Time Course Change of IGF1/Akt/mTOR/p70s6k Pathway Activation in Rat Gastrocnemius Muscle During Repeated Bouts of Eccentric Exercise. J Sports Sci Med 9:170-5.
  14. Goncalves D, Manfredi L, Graça F, Silveira W, Lustrino D, Kettelhut I and Navegantes LC (2015) ß<sub>2</sub>-Adrenergic Agonist Suppresses Foxo Transcriptional Activity by Regulating Foxo1 Phosphorylation but not Acetylation in Skeletal Muscle. The FASEB Journal:LB702.
  15. Li Y, Li Y, Han F, Yu H, Yang T, Guan W and Guo X (2016) The role of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR protein synthesis pathway in the skeletal muscle atrophy induced by COPD. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine:5677-5687.
  16. Burtscher M, Haider T, Domej W, Linser T, Gatterer H, Faulhaber M, Pocecco E, Ehrenburg I, Tkatchuk E, Koch R and Bernardi L (2009) Intermittent hypoxia increases exercise tolerance in patients at risk for or with mild COPD. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 165:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2008.10.012
  17. Son JS, Kim JH, Kim HJ, Yoon DH, Kim JS, Song HS and Song W (2016) Effect of resistance ladder training on sparc expression in skeletal muscle of hindlimb immobilized rats. Muscle Nerve 53:951-7. doi: 10.1002/mus.24940
  18. Guzzoni V, Ribeiro MBT, Lopes GN, de Cassia Marqueti R, de Andrade RV, Selistre-de-Araujo HS and Durigan JLQ (2018) Effect of Resistance Training on Extracellular Matrix Adaptations in Skeletal Muscle of Older Rats. Front Physiol 9:374. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00374
  19. Ramos-Campo DJ, Martinez-Guardado I, Rubio-Arias JA, Freitas TT, Othalawa S, Andreu L, Timon R and Alcaraz PE (2019) Muscle Architecture and Neuromuscular Changes After High-Resistance Circuit Training in Hypoxia. J Strength Cond Res. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003275
  20. Imoberdorf R, Garlick PJ, McNurlan MA, Casella GA, Marini JC, Turgay M, Bartsch P and Ballmer PE (2006) Skeletal muscle protein synthesis after active or passive ascent to high altitude. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38:1082-7. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000222836.66391.35
  21. Przyklenk A, Aussieker T, Gutmann B, Schiffer T, Brinkmann C, Struder HK, Bloch W, Mierau A and Gehlert S (2018) Effects of Endurance Exercise Bouts in Hypoxia, Hyperoxia, and Normoxia on mTOR-Related Protein Signaling in Human Skeletal Muscle. J Strength Cond Res. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002753
  22. Xu M, Chen X, Chen D, Yu B and Huang Z (2017) FoxO1: a novel insight into its molecular mechanisms in the regulation of skeletal muscle differentiation and fiber type specification. Oncotarget 8:10662-10674. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12891
  23. Margolis LM, Berryman CE, Murphy NE, Carrigan CT, Young AJ, Carbone JW and Pasiakos SM (2018) PI3K-AKT-FOXO1 pathway targeted by skeletal muscle microRNA to suppress proteolytic gene expression in response to carbohydrate intake during aerobic exercise. Physiol Rep 6:e13931. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13931
  24. Ajima H, Kai Y, Fujimaki J, Akashi S, Morita A, Ezaki O, Kamei Y and Miura S (2021) Effects of fenofibrate and its combination with lovastatin on the expression of genes involved in skeletal muscle atrophy, including FoxO1 and its targets. J Toxicol Sci 46:11-24. doi: 10.2131/jts.46.11
  25. de Theije CC, Schols A, Lamers WH, Ceelen JJM, van Gorp RH, Hermans JJR, Kohler SE and Langen RCJ (2018) Glucocorticoid Receptor Signaling Impairs Protein Turnover Regulation in Hypoxia-Induced Muscle Atrophy in Male Mice. Endocrinology 159:519-534. doi: 10.1210/en.2017-00603
  26. Kostek MC, Chen YW, Cuthbertson DJ, Shi R, Fedele MJ, Esser KA and Rennie MJ (2007) Gene expression responses over 24 h to lengthening and shortening contractions in human muscle: major changes in CSRP3, MUSTN1, SIX1, and FBXO32. Physiol Genomics 31:42-52. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00151.2006
  27. Mascher H, Tannerstedt J, Brink-Elfegoun T, Ekblom B, Gustafsson T and Blomstrand E (2008) Repeated resistance exercise training induces different changes in mRNA expression of MAFbx and MuRF-1 in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 294:E43-51. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00504.2007
  28. Leger B, Cartoni R, Praz M, Lamon S, Deriaz O, Crettenand A, Gobelet C, Rohmer P, Konzelmann M, Luthi F and Russell AP (2006) Akt signalling through GSK-3beta, mTOR and Foxo1 is involved in human skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy. J Physiol 576:923-33. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.116715
  29. Yin J, Huang J, Yuan W, Gu L, Wang L and Shang M (2014) [The role of Foxo1 and ubiquitin-proteasome system markers in muscle atrophy caused by chronic kidney disease]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 53:31-4.
  30. Waddell DS, Baehr LM, van den Brandt J, Johnsen SA, Reichardt HM, Furlow JD and Bodine SC (2008) The glucocorticoid receptor and FOXO1 synergistically activate the skeletal muscle atrophy-associated MuRF1 gene. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 295:E785-97. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00646.2007
  31. Damas F, Libardi CA and Ugrinowitsch C (2018) The development of skeletal muscle hypertrophy through resistance training: the role of muscle damage and muscle protein synthesis. Eur J Appl Physiol:485-500.
  32. Li-Li F, Bo-Wen L, Yue X, Zhen-Jun T and Meng-Xin C (2021) Aerobic exercise and resistance exercise alleviate skeletal muscle atrophy through IGF-1/IGF-1R-PI3K/Akt pathway in mice with myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00344.2021
  33. Bae JH, Seo DY, Lee SH, Shin C, Jamrasi P, Han J and Song W (2021) Effects of exercise on AKT/PGC1-alpha/FOXO3a pathway and muscle atrophy in cisplatin-administered rat skeletal muscle. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 25:585-592. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2021.25.6.585
  34. Gombos Z, Koltai E, Torma F, Bakonyi P, Kolonics A, Aczel D, Ditroi T, Nagy P, Kawamura T and Radak Z (2021) Hypertrophy of Rat Skeletal Muscle Is Associated with Increased SIRT1/Akt/mTOR/S6 and Suppressed Sestrin2/SIRT3/FOXO1 Levels. Int J Mol Sci 22. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147588
  35. Yamashita A, Hatazawa Y, Hirose Y, Ono Y and Kamei Y (2016) FOXO1 delays skeletal muscle regeneration and suppresses myoblast proliferation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 80:1531-5. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2016.1164585
  36. Gerst F, Kaiser G, Panse M, Sartorius T, Pujol A, Hennige AM, Machicao F, Lammers R, Bosch F, Haring HU and Ullrich S (2015) Protein kinase Cdelta regulates nuclear export of FOXO1 through phosphorylation of the chaperone 14-3-3zeta. Diabetologia 58:2819-31. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3744-z