Social Media Literacy: Fake News Consumption and Perception of Covid-19 in Nigeria

The emergence of social media in the late 90s as a result of the proliferation of the internet witnessed a new transformation of news production, dissemination, and consumption. The blogosphere has increasingly been popular and appealing to youths, who are so engrossed in the media that they spend much time navigating across various platforms. While social media eases the consumption of online news, it nurtures the spread of fake news leading to damning behaviour, particularly during the period of the Covid-19 pandemic. Despite the mainstream media’s efforts to enlighten people on the safety measures against the disease, the spread of misinformation and disinformation about the pandemic spread through social media tends to undermine adherence to preventive measures advised by health experts. The implication is risky behaviour that can worsen, instead of �attening the curve on the Covid-19. This study, therefore, assesses the ability of youth to detect fake news on social media; the effects of the fake news on their perception of the disease, and; their behaviour toward Covid-19 protocols. An online survey has been conducted using a questionnaire distributed to 108 students of two polytechnics through Facebook and WhatsApp. Descriptive and inferential analyses were run and the result revealed that the students can’t identify fake news though they consume news on social media platforms. It also shows a signi�cant relationship between the fake news consumption, their perception of the Covid-19 pandemic, and de�ance of safety protocols.


Introduction
Media literacy is most needed nowadays than at any other time in the past due to the in ux of multifaceted and complex information disseminated through the Internet, particularly new media platforms.Although those with the requisite literacy and skills are bound to enjoy safe consumption of their ability to discern and disregard fake news, naïve and unguided consumer are prone to the in uence of propaganda.Advancements in Internet technologies over a couple of decades have transformed human communication unprecedentedly.In its novelty days, internet technology was mostly used for security or defence and later extended to banking, media, and a few other sectors (Burton, 2005).
Nowadays, modern technologies changed the way people produced, disseminate, and consume news and information (Shin & Zanuddin, 2019).The invention of minicomputers, tablets, and smartphones, coupled with the proliferation of the internet ushered in social networking websites, like Facebook, WhatsApp Twitter, and other Web2.0 applications (Ahmed & Msughter, 2022).
Unlike mainstream media, the seamlessness of the internet has succeeded in integrating the cyber community in a way that allows the new media users to interact with netizens all over the technologydriven world.Sharing diverse news and information across boundaries, cultures, and identities enhances communication experiences, though has an adverse effect of increasing consumption of misleading fake news, hate speech, provocative comments, and disinformation that can result in con ict and other stinking consequences (Stewart, 2019).The new media embodies multimodality of instruments and contents, portability, high connectivity, diversity of consumption, and high interactivity as features that differentiate them from the old media (Eristi & Erdem, 2017).Burton, (2005) observes six characteristics of the new media including the creation of new textual experiences; the arrival of new ways of representing the world; the development of new relationships between the subject (both users and consumers) and media technologies; creation of new experiences of the relationship between embodiment, identity, and community; new conceptions of the biological body's relationship to technology and media and; the development of new patterns of organization and production.
Since the eruption of Covid-19 in Wuhan China in the eleventh hours of 2019 and its subsequent declaration as a global pandemic due to its rapid spread, there have been information and disinformation about the novel disease on the media, particularly social media has been at the centre stage of spreading multimedia messages across the globe (Bridgman et al., 2020).These social networking sites, on one hand, play a pivotal role in enlightening, informing, educating, and creating awareness about the disease; its causes, and; preventive measures like wearing a mask, social distancing, washing hands and staying at home, on the other hand, it spreads fake news and misinformation (Bridgman et al., 2020).Fake news related to the Covid-19 pandemic is gradually getting much popularity and increasing the threat facing humanity about the unprecedented spread of the virus to virtually all nooks and crannies of the globe irrespective of one's location.Although some of this fake news may be mildly mischievous.They mostly pose a grave threat of misguiding people to rely on baseless and unjusti ed assumptions at the expense of scienti cally proven guidelines offered by experts and in uence people's response to the pandemic (Ahinkorah et al., 2020).
In Nigeria, in the index case of Covid-19 in February 2020, authorities, private organisations, media outlets, and concerned individuals took it as a responsibility to sensitise and enlighten citizens on the disease to cushion the spread of the novel disease.Fake news about the pandemic deluge social particularly on social media including narratives like Corona is a conspiracy, exaggeration of several victims, certain concoctions can cure the disease, Covid-19 is an elitist disease, and coronavirus is spread by 5G network among other misleading information that is inimical to the safety and preventive protocols particularly.In societies where people lack adequate knowledge and skills to detect, identify and discard falsehood.Besides, exposure to disinformation can easily breed wrong perceptions and risky behaviour that undermines the effort put in place to rid our societies of the disease.Martens et al., (2018) suggest that strengthening media literacy may help consumers to better assess the quality of news articles but also shifts the burden of quality control from distributors to consumers.

Purpose And Objectives Of The Study
The aim of this study is to examine social media literacy within the context of fake news consumption and perception of Covid-19 among students of Federal Polytechnic, Mubi and Adamawa State Polytechnics.To achieve this broad aim, the following objectives are set:

Media Literacy And Digital (Social) Media Literacy
Media literacy is a multi-disciplinary terrain cutting across elds of human endeavour including sociology, mass communication, and education; hence the concept is viewed from different standpoints of scholars (Alvermann & Hagood, 2000).It refers to the ability of users to access, evaluate, analyse, integrate, manage, (re)create, synthesize and communicate information for action or transmission through 'on or o ine media (Phuapan et al., 2015).According to Ciurel (2017), media literacy means skills to think critically, analyse, evaluate and consume mediated messages consciously and cautiously.It generally entails the critical examination and understanding of the techniques, technologies, and institutions of media messages for analysis consumption and recognition of media in uences on the audience vis-a-vis societal socio-cultural and economic conditions (Tulodziecki & Grafe, 2012).It also involves the ability to select, analyse, discover, and use mass-mediated messages with due recourse to societal laws, ethics, norms, and values (Suparman, 2019).
The idea of media literacy was born in the 1960s in response to growing skepticism, fear, and resistance to broadcast and mass culture media perceived as agents of reshaping and conditioning peoples' thinking in line with the imposed technological domination.In 1970 and 1980, media literacy was mainstreamed to change that notion to the fact that television and lms are legitimate forms of expression and communication like print media by promoting skills of critical inquiry and analysis at schools, family levels, and other avenues (Hobbs & Jensen, 2009).Initially, the concept was peculiar to mainstream media but extended to digital media with the proliferation of digitised media technology and the internet.Digital media literacy is the ability to access, understand, evaluate and create online communication.Social media literacy also refers to skills and competencies required to enable cybercitizens to access, manipulate and think critically in creating, analysing, disseminating, and consuming content using the available digital technologies in a manner that enhances communication experience and builds seamless communication devoid of risk.It is associated with positive development and empowerment of young people who consume news regularly to be more careful and critical in consuming, producing, and sharing media content using different technologies to promote civic engagement and problem-solving (Shin & Zanuddin, 2019).Social media literacy, a subsection of digital literacy gained popularity as a result of a paradigm shift in communication occasioned by the advent and proliferation of the internet and computer technologies which bolster digitisation of virtually all spheres of human endeavours.However, since the emergence of social networking sites in the 1990s, platforms including globe.com,geocities.com,tripod.com,and six degrees took a stride step further by allowing users to socialize through chat rooms share news and information, and exchange pleasantries with friends and family members (Alassiri et al., 2014).The sites enjoy fast spread and enhancement with many fascinating features for sharing pictures, (live) video, audio, and text.This has invariably triggered a great shake-up that reduced communication to a palm-size device and bred citizen journalism, online news, blogging, etc. Social media also enhanced communication processes and nurtures sharing culture, easy access to news and information, news aggregation opportunities, multiple means of news distribution, and availability of a plethora of real and fake news.The technology realities eased access to information and heighten challenges of fake news distribution and consumption with perilous effects on individual consumers and society at large (Nekmat, 2020).

Social Media Fake News' In uence On Perception
Fake news can simply be referred to as a modern form of propaganda.Baran & Davis, (2012) see propaganda as a communication strategy adopted to propagate speci c ideology, beliefs, opinion and expectations often to in uence people's perception and behaviours through changing the way they conceive themselves and their social environment using mass media outlets.Usually, it is designed and disseminated mostly through media (mainstream and social media) to in uence audiences perception, opinion and conception of a particular matter in order to re ect the certain goals of the propagandist(s) (Courtney, 2018).It is often deliberately spread to promotea de nite political, economic or social motive(Ajakaiye & Dean, 2019).Okoro et al., (2018) categorise fake news into; serious fabrications, hoaxes and humorous.
Although the concept of fake news is relatively new, propaganda enjoyed decades changing proportionately to unfolding global realities.For example the approach was chosen by Hitler and Joseph Goebbels to brainwash Germans unleash a memorable terror against Jews.Proliferation of social networking sites prompted upsurge of fake news in an unimagined degree particularly among platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.Peddlers of the fake news usually exploit the popularity ofsocial media tospread falsehood to spreads across multiple platforms to accomplish their mischievous mission (Pate & Dauda, 2019).Despite decades of its existence, studies suggest that fake news gains more popularity than ever due to prevalence of viable technologies for disseminating various forms of information (Vargo et al., 2017) hence, its adaptation in theU.S. presidential election 2016 has exposed resurgence of the fake news and sparked debates at both scienti c and public domains over its potentiality to in uence social media experiences and important social dynamics (Reuter et al., 2019).
Consumption of fake news usually has a grave adverse effect on individuals and society.The tactical deception underlying the fake news contravenes principles of truthfulness, balance and factuality of ideal news, such messages largely in uence the way people interpret and respond to real news.It also triggers confusion that impedes people's ability to detect and forestall the negative effects of fake news (Shu et al., 2016).Hence a study by Powell, (2018) found that (60.9%) believe "fake news is having a harmful effect on its consumer's well-being by increasing levels of anxiety, damaging self-esteem and skewing their world view."Although, not all fake news are malicious, they are mostly misleading, so that those spread through social networking sites are easily accessed, hence its chances to in uence consumers particularly, those with di culties of differentiating the truth from falsehood (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017).Fake news is a universal phenomenon prevalent in all communities, though its magnitude varies from one country to another.In Nigeria, fake news enjoy wide spread chie y among youth who constitute the largest percentage of the social media users in the country.A report in 2019 indicates that, 95% percent of internet users have engage social media accounts, and 49% percent of the mare youth between the age of 18-35 (NOIPolls, 2019).At this period of Covid-19 pandemic, social networking sites appear to be the most popular channel of spreading news about the disease, hence, fake news peddlers utilise the opportunity to spread unfounded information about the pandemic.Usually, consumption of health related fake news tends to in uence the Nigerians perception of the pandemic (Ugwuanyi, 2017) and any manipulation of perception affects how individuals interpret the world around them and the events that unfold there in (Kastanakis & Voyer, 2014).John B. Watson, argue that the entirety of human action is a conditioned response to external environmental stimuli as against the assertions that, higher mental processes directs human action (Baran & Davis, 2012).Reuter et al., (2019) argue that perception of fake news in uence people's attitudes and shape social media users' experiences and behaviour to a larger degree.Perception constitutes an essential factor for understanding social media messages and responsive behaviour.Although a study shows that the behaviour of social media users who are not interested in reading news are rarely affected by the fake news (Panwar & Arora, 2019).While the prevalence of social fake news among Nigerians is high, frequent exposure to online false information articles impact on news consumption behaviour and capture consumer attention longer than true news particularly when it conforms to their biases (Martens et al., 2018).

Covid-19 Perceptions And Fake News
Covid-19 is a short form Coronavirus disease 2019, a novel disease alias SARS-CoV-2.The disease was discovered rst in Wuhan, Hubei province of China on November 17, 2019 (Amzat et al., 2020), henceforth, it kept spreading within the Chinese and subsequently to the entire world wreaking havoc that left millions of families in the state mourning (Ferguson & Bargh, (2004).The disease is infectious in nature, with symptoms like cough, fever, loss of smell and di culty in breathing (Ahinkorah et al., 2020).It is a communicable disease that spread fast through contact with droplets from particularly the mouth and nose of an infected person, or a surface of the virus carrier and touching mouth, nose, eyes and ears after wards.The unprecedented increase in the number of people tested positive for the disease Worldwide, Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared outbreak of the disease as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (World Health Organisation, 2020).
Nigeria recorded its rst case of Covid-19 case on 27th February, 2020 in Lagos, when an Italian citizen was isolated at point of arrival at the Lagos Airport tested positive for the virus.Similarly, on 8th March, 2020 a Nigerian returnee from Milan was isolated and tested positive for the virus, subsequently, the disease continued to spread throughout the country.Perpetual increase in the disease warranted lock down in phases in the strong holds of the disease and subsequently, the entire country to cushion the spread of the virus.During the quarantine period, o ces, businesses sectors, markets, religious centres, schools, public institutions and spaces were shut down except for essential services (Ahmed & Msughter, 2022).
Since the eruption of the disease, it has been popular on media pages enlightening and educating people on the Pandemic.The Internet, social networking sites have been at the forefront in spread information on the symptoms of the disease, preventive measures and much more about the Coronavirus (Ugwuanyi, 2017).However, the social media have also been used as a channel for spreading fake news about the pandemic which hamper adherence to protocols recommended by health experts.This prevails at the detriment of the concerted efforts of authorities, individuals and sectors to combat the transmission of the Virus among citizens.Agusi et al., (2020) lament that compliance with the NCDC directives has been a challenge as people fail to adhere due to either ignorance, misinformation or complete de ance (Ahinkorah et al., 2020).

Theoretical Framework
Social media is an important tool of conveying news and information to a diverse audience in a multimedia.Advancement and pervasiveness of technologies empowered every one with access to the internet to be originator of multidimensional messages using the available devices for sur ng the internet.Since the outbreak of Covid-19, in the last quarter of 2019, social media play a pivotal role in spreading contents meant to creating awareness and enlightening people about the disease, including the precautionary measures, signs and symptoms of the disease, free toll numbers to call and the disease hotspots amongst other vital information.The openness of social media platforms bolsters in ux of information from mostly anonymous and unauthenticated sources, which fuels dissemination of fake news.
In Nigeria, fake news about Covid-19 is ubiquitous on social media platforms orchestrated largely by youth who are the major users of the sites.Hussain et al., (2019) found that university students are the most dependent on the social networking sites.The narratives underlying the misinformation include psydo-theraphy, falsi cation of the pandemic, blaming 5G network for the spread of the disease, refuting the existence of virus and portraying quarantine and isolation as nancial motivated conspiracies planned by government o cials.The widely popular platforms (WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Telegram) have been the grand conduits for transmitting misinformation through peer2peer sharing, postings, charting and binging.Consumption of Covid-19 related fake news on the sites can have a devastating effect in volatiles societies like Nigeria as it can easily shape the perception of youth in manner that exposes them to the hydra-headed disease (Ugwuanyi, 2017).Moreover, media literacy among the country's' students is nothing to write-home-about.Moscadelli et al., (2020) found that a proper social media literacy is helpful in cushioning the spread of the disease (Jones-Jang et al., 2019) as perceived competence of media literacy leads to greater identi cation of fake news stories (Hussain et al., 2019).Social media literacy in this context is cogent perception shaper, capable of equipping individuals with requisite knowledge and skillsto critically interpret media content for resistance against any harmful in uence of fake news and mediate the relationship between consumption of harmful messages and subsequent decision making (Jones-jang et al., 2019).Hence, social media literacy is a sustentative inoculant against fake news (Banas & Rains, 2015) prevalent on social media.It forestalls the harmful effects of the fake news by enhancing understanding of the Covid-19 to detect ill-motivated information from the plethora of information on the sites.Media literacy inoculates social media news consumers against the harmful in uence of fake news by furnishing them with knowledge and skills for critically interpretation and safe consumption of the diverse news stories deluging the platforms.
The inoculation theory posits that prior-exposure of individual to impending persuasive attack and forewarning them there upon procreates resistance to attack on their perception and attitude, the way body systems of immunised persons resist disease (McGuire, 1961).It suggests that pre-exposure to negative effects of persuasive attack and conversance with facts strengthen resistance and cushion the effects of Fake news.Whereas medical inoculation involves injecting or feeding an individual a weakened form of a disease to enable them develop resistance against the disease, in communication inoculation refers knowledge, skills and competence required to guide critical creation, interpretation, analyses, dissemination and consumption of media messages (Jones-jang et al., 2019).Therefore, at this pandemic period, when all countries are committed to atten the curve on coronavirus, new media literacy is crucial to inoculate social media users against consumption and spread of dangerous fake news that can worsen the situation.An accurate and well-developed health communication tilted towards propagating adherence to safety tips is a key to lives saving during this Covid-19 pandemic crisis as it cushions the spread of the deadly virus (Finset et al., 2020).Inoculation fosters sharing genuine Covid-19 related information on the social networking sites in a manner that shapes understanding for proper argument and counter argument.It triggers scepticism and inquest of the motive and pattern of a story to discern and subdue the threat of spreading dangerously misleading news.Inoculating consumers against fake news bolsters critical thinking ability and proper analysis of Covid-19 related contents on the media for resistance and refutation.

Methodology
The study adopted a descriptive survey research design to guide the study.The population of the study comprises all students of Mubi Polytechnics in Adamawa State.A total of 108 students from Federal Polytechnic, Mubi and Adamawa State Polytechnic were purposively administered a questionnaire via Google form and the data collected were analysed descriptively inferentially using SPSS.The result of the descriptive analyses and T-test analyses were presented and discussed accordingly.Figure 5: The result shows that 40.7% of the respondents agreed while 29.6% strongly agreed that, there are misleading information on the social media, only 5.6% disagree, while 3.7% strongly disagree.20.4% of the respondents did not decide.

Fake news consumption on the social media
In a typical day, how much time do you spend using social media?The result revealed that the respondents most of them subscribes to more than as social media platform and it also reveals that the respondents are heavy social media users as 28.7% of them use the platforms for more than a 5hours daily, 6.5% and 19.4% navigate across social media for 3-4 and 23 hours daily respectively.I prefer reading/watching /listening to news and information posted on social media.The table suggests that, 37.0% agree and 18.5% strongly agree, coronavirus was prepared in a laboratory to target certain countries.While, 18.5% Disagree and 3.7% strongly disagree.22

Discussion Of The Results
Figure1.The demography indicates that the majority of the respondents are male students who constitute 76.9% of the respondents, and female students constitute only 23.1% of the total respondents.
Moreover, Figure 2 shows that most of the respondents are youth between the ages of 18-25 who constitute 80.6% of the respondents (NOIPolls, 2019), which is followed by those between the ages of 26-35 who constitute 14.8% of the total respondents.Those respondents ranging between the ages of 36-45 constitute only 4.6% of the total respondents, while none of the respondents exceeded 45 years.This shows that the social media users are mostly youths as revealed by (Stewart, 2019).
Similarly, nding the social media literacy, which is crucial for recognising and detecting the fake news, the result as presented in Figure 3, revealed that 52.8% and 28.7% check the sources of news content posted on social media.This behaviour of checking the sources of information consumed on social media.The implication is that the respondents' skepticism is informed by an awareness of fake news on social networking sites and the ability to detect such fake news on the platforms.Similarly, gure 4 revealed that 30.6% and 50.0% of the respondents check the date of the news story to make sure the story is relevant and up to date, only 3.7% don't care to check the veracity of the news consumed on social.This tallies with the nding of Kaeophanuek et al., (2018) that most students have the fundamental skills and capacity for properly using digital tools for communication and daily life actions.
Shin & Zanuddin, (2019) found that countering fake news requires critical thinking, evaluation, and judgment of the public who used to be the victims of misleading information.
Moreover, fake news consumption on social media.The result on the news consumption on social media revealed that in Figure 7 25.0% and 57.4% agreed and strongly agrees to have preferred consuming news on social media.Hence, the heavy usage of the social media platforms as indicated in Figure 6 which shows that most of the respondents subscribe to more than a social media platform and 28.7% of the respondents use the platforms for more than 5 hours daily, while 6.5% and 19.4% navigate across social media for 3-4 and 2-3 hours daily respectively.Moreover, despite the preference for news shared through social media platforms and the hours spent on the sites, the respondents are conscious of the prevalence of the fake news spread on social media (Pate & Dauda, 2019).This is evident in Figure 5, which shows that 40.7% and 29.6% agreed and strongly agreed respectively, that, there is misleading information on social media.stressed that concerted efforts of public and private institutions are crucial in tackling fake news.
Vraga & Jacobsen (2020) observe that consumers of online news were able to access unlimited reports about the spreading threat, however, it might be dangerous as some of them are ctitious Moreover, Fake news consumption on social media.The result on the news consumption on social media revealed that in Figure 7 25.0% and 57.4% agreed and strongly agrees to have preferred consuming news on social media.Hence, the heavy usage of the social media platforms as indicated in Figure 6 which shows that most of the respondents subscribe to more than a social media platform and 28.7% of the respondents use the platforms for more than 5 hours daily, while 6.5% and 19.4% navigate across social media for 3-4 and 2-3 hours daily respectively.
Moreover, despite the preference for news shared through social media platforms and the hours spent on the sites, the respondents are conscious of the prevalence of the fake news spread on social media (Pate & Dauda, 2019).This is evident in Figure 5  observes that consumers of online news were able to access unlimited reports about the spreading threat, however, it might be dangerous as some of them are ctitious (Kaeophanuek et al., 2018).
On the contrary ndings in Figure 9 suggests that 37.0% agree and 18.5% strongly agreed that Coronavirus was prepared in a laboratory to target certain countries, While, 18.5% disagree and 3.7% strongly disagree and 22.2% did not decide.Therefore, whereas the result shows that the respondents can identify fake news and often check the veracity of information, their perception that the virus is prepared in a lab to target certain people might be in uenced by either the fake news on the social media as a result of inadequate concerted sensitization efforts.Hussain et al., (2019) observe that students' perception of social media message credibility is a predictor of fake news perception.
The result on Covid-19 perception: The result in Figure 8 revealed that47.2% agreed and 27.8% strongly agreed that Coronavirus is real, while, 8.3% disagreed and 16.7% remained neutral.However, not a single respondent strongly disagrees.However, On the contrary, the ndings in Figure 9 suggest that 37.0% agree and 18.5% Strongly Agreed that Coronavirus was prepared in a laboratory to target certain countries, While, 18.5% disagree and 3.7% Strongly disagree and 22.2% did not decide.Therefore, whereas the result shows that the respondents can identify fake news and often check the veracity of information, their perception that the virus is prepared in a lab to target certain people might be in uenced by either the fake news on the social media as a result of inadequate concerted sensitisation efforts.Hussain et al., (2019) observe that students' perception of social media message credibility is a predictor of fake news perception.The implication of these results revealed that, whereas the respondents believe in the existence of coronavirus, they are skeptical about the source of the disease.

Conclusion
The study examined social media literacy within the context of fake news consumption and perception of Covid-19 in Nigeria.The study established that social media has provided a platform for anyone's voice to be heard, leaving students tasked with the challenge of determining what news to trust.When identifying fake news on social media, young adults are more likely to disregard news stories from sites like Instagram and Snapchat than they would from Twitter and Facebook.Regardless of the site, they get their news from, young adults feel the need to con rm the information they see on social media through other sources.Based on the ndings, the study discovered that those with perceived competence in media literacy lead to greater identi cation of fake news stories.Relevantly, there was a high level of awareness about what constitutes fake news, and this empowered voters to distinguish between fake or factual news and protect themselves against fake news.This meant that though fake news was commonly received via social media like platforms Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter.
Figure 6:The result revealed that the respondents most of them subscribes to more than as social media platform and it also reveals that the respondents are heavy social media users as 28.7% of them use the platforms for more than a 5hours daily, 6.5% and 19.4% navigate across social media for 3-4 and 23 hours daily respectively.
Almansa-mart, (2021) found that whereas citizens are interested in Covid-19 related information, it is distorted with false news spread on social networks as instant messages.Internet affordances promote sharing of fake news related to the Coronavirus pandemic among social media platforms users in Nigeria (Apuke & Omar, 2020).Nekmat, (2020) revealed that cognitive biased in uences users sharing of uncon rmed news on social media.WhatsApp and Facebook are found to be the most common Covid-19 information distribution social media platforms.Reuter et al., (2019) on the other hand, observe that people often interact with fake news without really identifying or knowing it.Shin & Zanuddin, (2019) 1. To examine social media literacy among students of Federal Polytechnic, Mubi and Adamawa State Polytechnics.2. To nd out fake news consumption on social media among students of Federal Polytechnic, Mubi and Adamawa State Polytechnics.3. To ascertain the perception of Covid-19 among students of Federal Polytechnic, Mubi and Adamawa The nding indicates that, 80.6% of the respondents are between the ages of 18 -25, while 14.8% range between the ages of 26-35, and only 4.6% are between the ages of 36-45.Hence, none of the respondents exceeds 45 years.This shows that the social media users are mostly youths.The result of the study revealed that the study are capable of detecting fake news on the social media, with 52.8%, and 28.7% check the sources of news content posted on social media.I usually check the date of the news story to make sure the story is relevant and up to date.6% and 50.0%strongly and agree that, they check the date of the news story to make sure the is relevant and up to date, only 3.7% don't care to check the veracity of the news consumed on social.There are misleading information about Covid 19 on social media.
In the same vein, the results also revealed that the respondents preferred consuming news on social media platforms as 25.0% and 57.4% agreed and strongly agrees to have preferred to consuming news on social media.
The results indicate that 39.8% strongly and 37.0% agreed to have been washing their hands regularly with soap and alcohol base substances to avoid contracting Covid-19.While, 6.5% disagreed and 0.9% strongly disagreed with the statement of hand washing.I stay at home and avoid crowded places to cushion the spread of Covid-19.
Vraga & Jacobsen, (2020))d 29.6% agreed and strongly agreed respectively, that, there is misleading information on social media.Almansa-mart, (2021) found that whereas citizens are interested in Covid-19 related information, it is distorted with false news spread on social networks as instant messages.Internet affordances promote sharing of fake news related to the Coronavirus pandemic among social media platforms users in Nigeria (Apuke & Omar, 2020).WhatsApp and Facebook are found to be the most common Covid-19 information distribution social media platforms.Reuter et al., (2019) on the other hand, observe that people often interact with fake news without really identifying or knowing it.Shin & Zanuddin, (2019) stressed that concerted efforts of public and private institutions are crucial in tackling fake news.Moscadelli et al., (2020)also observed that social media companies have a signi cant role to play in improving, strengthening, and reinforcing their policies against the spread of "fake news", particularly during this period of Covid-19.Vraga & Jacobsen, (2020)