In this study, we investigated the acute effect of drinking coffee on microcirculation and the thickness of the retina and optic nerve head. The results of our study didn’t show a significant change in neural structural parameters. Peripapillary RNFL thickness did not change significantly following coffee drinking. Although the change in foveal thickness (1.36 µm) was statistically significant, it may not be of clinical significance. Because the axial resolution of Angiovue scans is 3–5 µm that means a 1µm difference between baseline thickness and after coffee drinking thickness may be a measurement error. Although assessments of macular vasculature showed a significant decrement in superficial and deep vessels density at parafovea, vessel densities at the fovea and deep capillary plexus at perifovea showed no significant change. Similarly, there was no significant change in ONH and peripapillary capillary plexus. These findings suggest that the changes in microcirculation trends to the superficial vessels and the farther we go from the parafovea to perifovea and peripapillary area, the less impact we encounter. As we showed, vessel density in the deep capillary plexus significantly decreases at the parafovea, but there is no such significant decrement at the perifovea.
In 2001, Mahmud and Feely showed that caffeine increases arterial stiffness, arterial blood pressure, and peripheral vascular resistance.11 In 2010, Mostofsky et al claimed that coffee increases the risk of an ischemic stroke just immediately after drinking it (within 1 hour), particularly among infrequent drinkers, because the plasma caffeine concentration reaches its peak in this period.12 In 2017, Washio et al showed that although coffee drinking acutely raises arterial stiffness, it doesn’t affect the middle cerebral artery pulsatile stress, so the increased risk of stroke after drinking coffee could be due to other unknown factors.3 This result can be interpreted to the hypothesis that autoregulation plays an important role in preventing pulsatile stress after coffee drinking from large arteries reach to small arteries, arterioles, and capillary beds. Differences in the behavior of the macular vessels and the optic nerve head in response to coffee consumption can be due to different autoregulation responses in these areas. Studies on macular vascular changes in glaucoma indicate a greater impact of this disease on the superficial vascular network.13 It seems that the susceptibility of vessels at macula to the environmental insults and their autoregulation mechanisms are different between the superficial and deep layers.14 ONH and retinal circulation impairment could increase the susceptibility of ganglion cells and nerve fibers to high IOP. It is hypothesized that intraocular pressure (IOP) is not the only determining factor in the development and progression of glaucoma, but retinal nerve fiber and optic nerve head susceptibility to IOP are of the same importance.15, 16 Using laser speckle flowgraphy, Okuno et al, reported an increased blood vessel resistance and a decreased blood flow in the human ONH and choroid-retina in response to oral caffeine consumption.17 In this technique a speckle pattern laser is projected onto the desired area of the retina and a sensor would detect the blurred scattered light coming back from the retina. The square blur rate (SBR) is the value produced in this method to correlate with the retinal blood flow velocity. Unlike Okuno’s study results, we didn’t find a significant change in ONH blood flow in response to coffee consumption. The participants of the Okuno study took a capsule containing 100 milligrams of pure caffeine, but in our study, we used a coffee drink containing 150 milligrams of caffeine. The bioavailability of these two products differs and coffee drink contains many other ingredients which may affect the pharmacokinetics of caffeine. Our purpose was to find out if commercial caffeine-containing drinks could alter ONH and retinal circulation. If we could demonstrate the effect of coffee on retinal circulation in normal individuals with normal ONH blood flow autoregulation, a more significant adverse effect would be expected in patients with impaired ONH blood flow regulation such as in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).18 Then some considerations may be necessary to be taken by glaucoma patients in their daily nutritional habits.
In this study, we showed that there is a significant difference in changes of MSVD between the two genders at parafovea and perifovea. Differences in vasoregulation between males and females could be due to variations in responses of vascular endothelial cells to different vasoactive agents.19
Our study had some limitations. Small sample size, lack of control group and no masking of participants were among these limitations.