Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by impairments in impulse control, social functioning along with a deficit in emotional awareness and empathy. In this study, nine BPD patiens filled out the demography, Interpersonal Reactive Index(IRI), Toronto Alexithymia Scale 20 (TAS 20), The Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST), and the Borderline Evaluation Severity over Time (BEST) questionnaire. Default mode network (DMN) connectivity was measured using resting-state fMRI before psychodynamic psychotherapy and then every four months for a year after initiating psychotherapy. BPD patients present with aberrant DMN connectivity compared to healthy controls. Over a year of psychotherapy, the BPD patients showed both neuroimaging changes (decreasing nodal degree connection in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and increasing in other cingulate cortex regions) and behavioral improvement in their symptoms and substance use. There was also a significant positive association between the decreased nodal degree in regions of the cingulate gyrus and a decrease in the score of the TAS-20 indicating difficulty in identifying feelings after psychotherapy. In BPD, there is altered connectivity within the DMN and disruption in self-processing and emotion regulation. Psychotherapy may modify the DMN connectivity and that modification is associated with positive changes in BPD behavioral symptoms.
Article
Default mode network connectivity as a possible biomarker for emotional self- awareness improvement in borderline personality disorder
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1609095/v1
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License
Version 1
posted
You are reading this latest preprint version
Default mode network
connectivity
resting-state fMRI
borderline personality disorder
-
Patients with BPD presented with aberrant DMN connectivity compared to a matched healthy control group.
-
After one year of psychodynamic psychotherapy patients with BPD showed Behavioral improvement in their symptoms
-
After one year of psychodynamic psychotherapy patients with BPD showed neuroimaging changes (hypo-connectivity in dACC) along with an increase in emotional awareness.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe mental illness with a relatively high prevalence among the population,1% and 10 to 12% in the clinical outpatient setting 1. It is characterized by impairments in emotion regulation, impulse control, and interpersonal and social functioning 2. They may also have difficulty in comprehending their own feelings also known as alexithymia 3. People with BPDs also show deficits in mentalizing4 and self-awareness 5, two processes that give us the capacity to understand our inner world. Furthermore, individuals with BPD do not merely have problems understanding their own emotions but also understanding and communicating others’ emotions i.e. empathizing 6.
In patients with BPD with disturbed self-image, identity, and empathizing6, resting-state connectivity is abnormal 7. For example, in the study of Wolf 7, patients with BPD had decreased connectivity of the left inferior parietal lobule and the mid-left temporal cortex in the default mode network (DMN). The DMS's interaction within midline regions shapes our sense of self 8. DMN connectivity is also associated with emotional awareness 9. The prognosis of BPD with these neurobiological changes over time is variable. Externalizing symptoms like self-destructive behaviors, impulsive reactions, and aggression tend to decline over time 1011 while internalizing symptoms such as identity confusion and sense of emptiness, which are the primary sources of suffering in these patients, may persist throughout life12. As a consequence, BPD patients are high-utilizers of medical resources. There are no FDA-approved medications for BPD and research in this field is more limited than other psychiatric conditions with similar or even fewer morbidities 1314.
Given the lack of therapeutic medications, the leading treatment choice is psychotherapy. There are various psychodynamic approaches for BPD patients; as many as eight different therapies for the treatment of BPD have been demonstrated to be effective in randomized controlled trials 15. The primary mechanism of change in all psychotherapeutic interventions is improving patients' communication with the external world 16. Despite the modest efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions, there is minimal evidence whether a baseline evaluation of BPD can predict patient response to psychotherapeutic or medical interventions 1718. In addition, research on the impact of BPD psychodynamic psychotherapy on default mode network functioning, empathetic behavior, and emotional awareness is lacking 619.
Below we report on default mode network connectivity patterns in patients with BPD compared to healthy control and their alteration after one year of psychodynamic psychotherapy. We also explored the association of this alteration with improvements in clinical symptoms, emotional awareness, and empathy. We hypothesized that psychotherapy would improve default mode network dysfunction, and that improvement would be associated with improvement in emotional self-awareness (decrease in alexithymia) and emotional communication (empathy).
2.1. Participants
Thirteen patients with BPD referring to clinics and psychiatric wards of Iran University of medical sciences were recruited. The diagnosis was based on a Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic-II (SCID-II) by trained examiners. Patients younger than 18-years-old, or older than 90-years-old were excluded as were patients with a major neurological disorder such as epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, comorbidity with antisocial personality disorder, substance use disorder during the year of study, alcohol or cannabis intoxication, major mood disorder, psychotic disorder, education lower than high school. To be enrolled in the study, patients were required to be stable on their medications for at least one month before recruiting. Participants entered the study after they were fully informed about the one-year duration and the research purpose and completed an informed consent. Four participants dropped out during one year of psychotherapy and they were excluded from the analyses. Nine healthy participants younger than 18-years-old, or older than 90-years-old were excluded as were patients with a major neurological disorder such as epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, comorbidity with antisocial personality disorder, substance use disorder during the year of study, alcohol or cannabis intoxication, major mood disorder, psychotic disorder, education lower than high school. All the research was approved by the ethical committee of the Iran University of Medical Sciences (Ethical code: IR.IUMS.REC.1398.872) and informed consent was taken from all the participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of Helsinki.
2.2. Instruments
2.2.1. Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic-I (SCID I)
This is a semi-structured interview for examination of major axis I psychiatric disorders based on DSM IV criteria. Its reliability and validity in the Persian translation has been established and it’s test-retest reliability is fair to good 2021222324.
2.2.2. Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic II (SCID II)
The Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic-II (SCID-II), carried out as a semi-clinical structured interview, is conducted to diagnose personality disorders based on the DSM IV. The SCID-II shows adequate interrater reliability (from .48 to .98) and good reliability for dimensional diagnosis (from .90 to .98) and internal consistency (.71-.98). The SCID-II questionnaire was translated into Persian but its psychometric investigation is somewhat limited. In one study, the Persion SCID II test-retest reliability was reported at 0.87 25.
2.2.3. The Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)
This scale was first developed to evaluate a wide range of substance use and consequent problems in primary care patients. The ASSIST items were considered easy to answer and were found to be reliable and feasible to administer in an international study. The test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.58 to 0.9. The reliability range for different categories of substances averaged 0.61 for sedatives to 0.78 for opioids2627.
2.2.4. Borderline evaluation of severity over time questionnaire (BEST)
This is a self-report measure that assesses the change and severity of BPD, such as thoughts, feelings, and negative actions over time. It includes 15 items and three subscales on the Likert-like Range 28. Its reliability and validity have been studied in Persian 29.
2.2.5. Interpersonal Reactive Index (IRI)
The IRI is a self-report questionnaire. It assesses four dimensions of empathy, and each subscale (empathic concern, perspective-taking, personal distress, and fantasy) is made up of 7 items.
Participants rate how much an item will describe them on a 5-point Likert scale. (does not describe me well = 0 to represent me very well = 4). The maximum and minimum total scores on this questionnaire are 28 and 0, respectively. This questionnaire has shown relatively good psychometrics with high internal consistency (Alfa Cronbach of 0.68 to 0.79 (Davis, 1983), good reliability for both cognitive (alpha = 0.654) and emotional empathy (alpha = 0.767). Cronbach's Alpha of each subscale ranges between 0.7 to 0.77 (Davis, 1994). Test-retest reliability was reported within 0.62 to 0.8 303132. This questionnaire has been translated into Persian and it’s psychometric properties have been studied extensively 33.
2.2.6. Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20)
This questionnaire evaluates four dimensions of emotional awareness, including difficulty identifying the feeling, difficulty describing feelings, and externally oriented thinking. Its validity and reliability have been studied by Bagby and et al 34 and has shown fairly good reliability and validity in Persian 353637.
2.3. Psychotherapy
Once weekly, patients had a session of therapeutic session emphasizing the Transference Focused Psychotherapy approach. The content of the session was written by the therapist every week. The patient's progression through the year was noted and analyzed. Core concepts of transference and countertransference, defense mechanisms, and signs of emotional communication were highlighted. Each therapist had an individual supervisor. In addition, monthly group supervisory sessions were held to work through the dynamics of the sessions and feelings of being part of a study.
2.4. Procedure
Participants were recruited by convenience sampling among patients referred to clinics and psychiatric wards of the Iran University of Medical Sciences. Those who meet inclusion criteria based on the SCID II interview entered the study. After completing the informed consent, participants filled out the demographic questionnaire, IRI, TAS 20, ASSIST, BEST questionnaire. Then their default mode network connectivity was measured using resting-state fMRI before initiating psychodynamic psychotherapy. After starting psychodynamic psychotherapy, DMN connections were assessed 3 more times with each assessment separated by approximately 4 months (so that including their baseline assessment, the total number of fMRI assessments for each individual was 4). Finally, at the conclusion of their therapy patients again completed the IRI, TAS 20, ASSIST, the BEST questionnaire to monitor any possible changes.
2.5. fMRI acquisition
Multimodal MRI data were collected in a Siemens magnetom Prisma 3T MRI scanner. The resting-state functional MRI images covering the whole brain were obtained with an echo-planar imaging sequence with the following parameters: 240 volumes (8 min and 6 s), axial slices = 32 slices with 3.5 mm thickness, repetition time (TR) = 2000 ms, echo time (TE) = 30 ms, flip angle (FA) = = 90°, voxel size: 3.1×3.1×3.5 mm, the field of view = 200×200 mm, and matrix size = of 64 × 64. T1-weighted structural images were acquired for co-registration of functional images using a sagittal 3D-magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence: TR 1800 ms, TE = 3.53 ms, inversion time(TI) = 1100 ms, FA = 7°, FOV = 256 × 256 mm2, matrix size = 256 × 256, slice thickness = 1 mm, and scan time = 4min and 12 s.
2.6. fMRI Analysis
The analyses consist of five sequential steps that included pre-processing, extracting DMN FC matrix (FCM) based on the automated anatomical labeling (AAL) atlas, thresholding, and binary FCM, constructing binary graph network from binary FCM and extracting graph-theoretical features, and finally comparison and statistical analyses.
2.6.1. Preprocessing
For each subject, Preprocessing of the rs-fMRI data was carried out using statistical parametric mapping (SPM12) and the data processing assistant for resting-state fMRI (DPARSF) toolbox version 4.5 38. Briefly, the following steps were carried out: 1) removing the first 10 volumes of the 240 volumes to allow for magnetization equilibrium; 2) Skull stripping was performed on both functional and structural images to remove non-brain tissue before co-registration of T1 images and functional images for better registration of T1 image to functional space; 3) slice-timing correction; 4) correcting for head movements, which required the images to be realigned with a six-parameter (rigid body) linear transformation. Individual structural images were co-registered to mean functional images; 5) segmentation of T1-weighted images into grey matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); 6) regressing out of 27 nuisance covariates, including signals from WM and, CSF, global signals, and Friston 24 motion parameters; 7) Spatial normalization was done to the standard template Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space; 8) Spatial smoothening with a Gaussian kernel of 6 mm full-width at half-maximum (FWHM_); and 9) Subsequently, a temporal band pass filter (0.01–0.01Hz) was performed to reduce the influence of low-frequency drift and high frequency respiratory and cardiac noise.
2.6.2. Brain functional connectivity matrix (FCM) and Graph construction
For analysis of FC, the seed regions of the default mode network(DMN) were chosen based on a priori knowledge 3940 from the AAL atlas 41 with the DMN regions shown in Table 1. The time series for each region were extracted and then on each pair, the Pearson correlation was used to obtain a correlation matrix for each participant. Based on the correlation matrices, we constructed a weighted brain graph or weighted functional connectivity matrix by using a set of sparsity thresholds ranging from 5–40% with a step of 1% (5 ≤ T ≤ 40). The sparsity threshold represented the proportion of the present connections to the maximum possible connections within the network. This approach included assigning labels 1 to D% (density) of the strongest connections in each network and 0 to other connections. 42. For group comparison, unlike the absolute threshold, the use of proportional thresholds ensures that the network of each group have the same number of nodes and edges42. This makes more meaningful comparisons between the two groups. We described FC with a network density of 5–40%. The Range of 5–40% was chosen for interpretation, because, according to previous reports, this range is in overall consistency with the biological background of the brain functional networks 4344.
|
DMN Regions (or nodes) |
Abbreviation |
|---|---|
|
Left and right Superior frontal gyrus, orbital part |
ORBsub.L, ORBsub.R |
|
Left and right Middle frontal gyrus |
MFG.L, MFG.R |
|
Left and right Inferior frontal gyrus, orbital part |
ORBinf.L, ORBinf.R |
|
Left and right Superior frontal gyrus, medial |
SFGmed.L, SFGmed.R |
|
Left and right Superior orbital frontal gyrus, medial |
ORBsupmed.L,ORBsupmed.R |
|
Left and right Anterior cingulate and Paracingulate gyri |
ACG.L, ACG.R |
|
Left and right Median cingulate and Paracingulate gyri |
DCG.L, DCG.R |
|
Left and right Posterior cingulate gyrus |
PCG.L, PCG.R |
|
Left and right Hippocampus |
HIP.L, HIP.R |
|
Left and right Parahippocampal gyrus |
PHG.L, PHG.R |
|
Left and right Inferior parietal lobule |
IPL.L, IPL.R |
|
Left and right Angular gyrus |
ANG.L, ANG.R |
|
Left and right Precuneus |
PCUN.L, PCUN.R |
|
Left and right Middle temporal gyrus |
MTG.L, MTG.R |
|
Left and right Temporal gyrus pole: middle temporal |
TPOmid.L, TPOmid.R |
|
Left and right Inferior temporal gyrus |
ITG.L, ITG.R |
2.6.3. Graph-theoretical measures
Centrality metrics can determine the importance of each node in a brain network, which makes them appropriate measures to capture the complexity of functional connectivity. Among these metrics, the nodal degree is the most popular measure of centrality since it is directly related to functional connectivity 454647. Furthermore, the nodal degree is shown to have a high correlation with other centrality metrics (betweenness centrality, clustering coefficient, node neighbor's degree, and closeness centrality) 45484950. We calculated the ‘nodal degree’ in DMN regions and compared patients with BPD with the healthy control group.
The ‘nodal degree’ of each node equals the total number of edges that are connected to a node 51 46.
where N is the number of all nodes in the network, aij is the connection value between a pair of nodes (i and j), with aij = 1 when a connection between (i, j) exists, and aij = 0 unless otherwise.
2.6.4. Statistical analyses
A nonparametric permutation test with 10000 resamples was used to evaluate the significance of differences in degree between the HC and BPD groups. The nonparametric permutation test is used to determine whether a measured effect is genuine or is a statistical anomaly due to the randomness associated with the selection of the sample 52. Permutation testing for controlling the nominal type I error is considered acceptable 52. We also used a non-parametric permutation test to assess the significance of the differences between groups (reported as p-values) and to determine the 95% confidence intervals 53.
2.7. Association of nodal degree results with clinical measurements
To determine the relationship between nodal degree results and clinical variables, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated using SPSS 25 (SPSS Inc; Chicago, Illinois). The clinical variables included the empathy, assist, TAS, and best measures. Also, we used paired t-tests to evaluate differences between pre-and post- psychotherapy clinical evaluations.
3.1. DMN alternation in BPD during psychotherapy compared to the HC
3.1.1. Baseline
We first compared the HC and BPD groups at baseline and found that the nodal degree in left and right ACG in the BPD group was less than in the HC group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1.A). Furthermore, the nodal degree in the right DCG was greater in the BPD (baseline) group compared to the HC group (P < 0.05) In other regions of the DMN, no significant difference was found between the HC and BPD (baseline) group.
3.1.2. Four months’ post-psychotherapy onset
The nodal degree was significantly greater in the BPD groups 4 months after psychotherapy, (Phase1) compared to the HC group, in the right PCUN and DCG (P < 0.05). Also, the nodal degree in the left inferior ORB was lesser in the BPD (phase1) group compared to the HC group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1.B).
3.1.3. Eight months’ post-psychotherapy onset
Compared with the HC group, the BPD group, 8 months after psychotherapy (Phase2), showed a significantly greater nodal degree in the right DCG (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the nodal degree in the right ACG and left ANG was less in the BPD (phase2) group compared to the HC group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1.C).
3.1.4. Twelve months’ post-psychotherapy onset
Comparing HC and BPD groups 12 months after the onset of psychotherapy (phase3), the nodal degree in the right ITG in the BPD group was greater than in the HC group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1.D). In other regions of the DMN, no significant difference was found between the HC and BPD (phase3) groups.
3.2. DMN alternation in BPD during psychotherapy compared to the BPD in baseline
In the DMN, the nodal degree was significantly greater in the right ACG in the BPD group 4 months after psychotherapy compared to their baseline (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2.A). In contrast, the nodal degree was significantly less in left ORBinf and right PCG in DMN (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2.A). In the DMN, no significant difference was found between BPD (8 months after psychotherapy) and BPD (baseline). Comparing the baseline to 12 months after psychotherapy in the BPD group, the nodal degree in right DCG and right PCG in the BPD group 12 months after psychotherapy was less than that seen at baseline (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the nodal degree in the right ACG was greater in the BPD group 12 months after psychotherapy compared to baseline (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2.B).
3.3. Alternation nodal degree of ACG, DCG in BPD pre-post psychotherapy
Figure-3. A shows Nodal degree of ACG, DCG, and PCG pre and post psychotherapy. Three major points emerged: 1) nodal degree of DCG and PCG after 12-month psychotherapy were significantly decreased in the BPD group. 2)In contrast nodal degree of ACG in the BPD group after 12-month psychotherapy was significantly increased.3) after 12-month psychotherapy, nodal degree pattern in ACG, DCG, and PCG in BPD group similar to the pattern of nodal degree these regions in the HC group. Figure-3. B shows a schematic brain view of ACG, DCG, and PCG.
3.4. statistical analysis on clinical measurements
We found a significant positive association between the decreased nodal degree of DCG and decrease in the score of difficulty identify feeling subscale of the TAS-20 (R = 0.801, after FDR correction at q < 0.01) after psychotherapy. Results of the dependent (paired) sample t-tests indicated that there were significant differences in the score of Assist, the score of Best, and the score of TAS (difficulty identify feeling subscale) between pre and post psychotherapy (Table 2). Mean values in post psychotherapy for Assist, Best and TAS decreased significantly (P value < 0.05).
|
parameters |
Pre(baseline) Mean ± std |
Post (12 months) Mean ± std |
Mean change(post-pre) |
P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Assist |
13.67 ± 13.51 |
10 ± 10.13 |
-3.67 |
0.021* |
|
Best |
44.00 ± 10.05 |
35.89 ± 9.49 |
-8.11 |
0.008* |
|
TAS(difficulty identifying feeling subscale) |
24.22 ± 5.14 |
18.89 ± 6.22 |
-5.33 |
0.012* |
|
TAS(difficulty describing feeling subscale) |
15.89 ± 4.14 |
13.56 ± 3.36 |
-2.33 |
0.264 |
|
TAS(attention) |
23.00 ± 7.35 |
20.56 ± 3.71 |
-2.44 |
0.458 |
|
Total TAS |
63.11 ± 13.22 |
53 ± 8.57 |
-10.11 |
0.087 |
|
EC (empathic concern) |
16.00 ± 4.12 |
17.11 ± 4.80 |
1.11 |
0.481 |
|
PT(perspective talking) |
14.11 ± 1.9 |
14.44 ± 3.88 |
0.33 |
0.784 |
|
PD(personal distress) |
15.78 ± 5.54 |
17.33 ± 4.53 |
1.56 |
0.391 |
|
F(fantasy) |
14.78 ± 4.66 |
15.56 ± 6.13 |
0.78 |
0.417 |
| *P value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant | ||||
Our study showed that patients with BPD present with aberrant DMN connectivity compared to a matched healthy control group. However, after one year of psychodynamic psychotherapy, they showed neuroimaging changes (hyperconnectivity in ACC and hypo-connectivity in dACC (DCG)) that were associated with behavioral improvement in their symptoms and decreased substance use. We also found that the decrease in dACC connectivity was associated with BPD patient improvement in identifying their feeling.
The BPD patients demonstrated aberrant connectivity including hyperconnectivity in the dACC and hypoconnectivity in the ACC in their DMN before starting psychodynamic psychotherapy. This finding is in line with previous studies that showed abnormal connections in the DMN in patients with BPD 5455. Previous studies showed structural abnormalities in GM in the DMN and frontolimbic circuit 54 and disturbed activity in the regions of the midline core and the dorsal subsystem of the DMN in patients with BPD. These abnormalities are thought to reflect interpersonal emotional communication and emotion regulation difficulties in BPD 55. More specifically, amygdala hyperactivity along with ACC hypoactivity has been proposed as the neural mechanism of emotion dysregulation in negative emotion processes in BPD 5657. ACC abnormal activity suggests a dysfunction in frontolimibic circuitry which suggests a reduced capacity of patients with BPD to effectively activate their PFC during emotional situations leading to hyperlimbic activity and hyperarousal in these situations585960616263. The DMN is also related to emotional self-referential processing 626364, which is markedly affected in BPD. Accordingly, we also observed hyperconnectivity in the dACC. The dorsal portion of the dACC is considered critical for salience detection, attention regulation and cognitive control 65666768697071727374. Furthermore, in emotionally charged situations, there is an interaction between attention and emotion in the dACC 7576. Experimental tasks that direct attention towards emotion engage the dACC 777879. Greater awareness of one's own emotional experiences is associated with greater recruitment of the dACC during emotional arousal. This finding might reflect greater attention to processing emotional information 80. However, in patients with BPD, we found hyperconnectivity of dACC in resting state. This finding, given previous reports on BPD patient ruminations, suggests increased attention to negative social information and enhanced self-referential processing (e.g. retrieval of negative memories of interpersonal events) during the resting state in patients with BPD.
Our results, however, showed that psychotherapy may help to regulate BPD dysfunctional behavior (leading to an increase in ACC and decrease in dACC connectivity). BPD patients showed a reduction in symptom severity over time and a decrease in substance abuse. They also showed less difficulty in identifying their feelings and emotions. These findings were associated with a reduction in dACC hyperactivity. It is possible that psychotherapy creates a secure atmosphere to effectively process traumatic interpersonal events and emotional regulation, resulting in a DMN resting state approaching normal. Our study has some notable caveats. Due to the long course of psychotherapy, we had BPD patient dropouts and our small sample size requires replication with a larger sample size. Furthermore, our exclusion criteria led to the omission of more severe BPD patients.
In conclusion, in BPD, there is altered connectivity within DMN and disruption in self-processing and emotion regulation. Psychotherapy may not only alleviate behavioral dysfunction but also normalizes connectivity within the DMN.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all research participants and the Iranian National Brain Mapping Laboratory (NBML), Tehran, Iran, for providing the data acquisition service.
Author Contributions Statement
S.A. and FS.M. wrote the main manuscript text and contributed to the conception and design of the experiment, and analysis of the data. S.N., H.M., M.E., and J.G. contributed to the idea, design, and development of the experiment and editing of the main manuscript text. N.K. and M.M. collected the data.
Data availability statement
Data can be made available upon reasonable request.
- Ellison, W. D., Rosenstein, L. K., Morgan, T. A. & Zimmerman, M. Community and clinical epidemiology of borderline personality disorder. Psychiatric Clinics 41, 561–573 (2018).
- Edition, F. %J A. P. A. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 21, (2013).
- Nemiah, J. C., Sifneos, P. E. %J P. & psychosomatics. Psychosomatic illness: a problem in communication. 18, 154–160 (1970).
- Bateman, A. W. & Fonagy, P. %J J. of personality disorders. Mentalization-based treatment of BPD. 18, 36–51 (2004).
- Semerari, A., Carcione, A., Dimaggio, G., Nicolò, G. & Procacci, M. %J P. R. Understanding minds: Different functions and different disorders? The contribution of psychotherapy research. 17, 106–119 (2007).
- Harari, H., Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Ravid, M. & Levkovitz, Y. %J P. research. Double dissociation between cognitive and affective empathy in borderline personality disorder. 175, 277–279 (2010).
- Wolf, R. C. et al. Aberrant connectivity of resting-state networks in borderline personality disorder. 36, 402 (2011).
- Qin, P. & Northoff, G. %J N. How is our self related to midline regions and the default-mode network? 57, 1221–1233 (2011).
- Smith, R. et al. Resting state functional connectivity correlates of emotional awareness. NeuroImage 159, 99–106 (2017).
- Kaess, M., Brunner, R. & Chanen, A. %J P. Borderline personality disorder in adolescence. 134, 782–793 (2014).
- Morgan, T. A., Chelminski, I., Young, D., Dalrymple, K. & Zimmerman, M. %J J. of psychiatric research. Differences between older and younger adults with borderline personality disorder on clinical presentation and impairment. 47, 1507–1513 (2013).
- Fonagy, P. et al. ESCAP Expert Article: Borderline personality disorder in adolescence: An expert research review with implications for clinical practice. 24, 1307–1320 (2015).
- Lieb, K., Völlm, B., Rücker, G., Timmer, A. & Stoffers, J. M. %J T. B. J. of P. Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Cochrane systematic review of randomised trials. 196, 4–12 (2010).
- Ripoll, L. H., Triebwasser, J. & Siever, L. J. %J T. T. I. J. of N. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy for personality disorders. 14, 1257–1288 (2011).
- Leichsenring, F., Leibing, E., Kruse, J., New, A. S. & Leweke, F. %J T. L. Borderline personality disorder. 377, 74–84 (2011).
- Fonagy, P., Luyten, P. & Allison, E. %J J. of personality disorders. Epistemic petrification and the restoration of epistemic trust: A new conceptualization of borderline personality disorder and its psychosocial treatment. 29, 575–609 (2015).
- Stanley, B., Perez-Rodriguez, M. M., Labouliere, C. & Roose, S. %J J. of personality disorders. A neuroscience-oriented research approach to borderline personality disorder. 32, 784–822 (2018).
- Perez, D. L. et al. Frontolimbic neural circuit changes in emotional processing and inhibitory control associated with clinical improvement following transference-focused psychotherapy in borderline personality disorder. 70, 51–61 (2016).
- Abbass, A. A. et al. Review of psychodynamic psychotherapy neuroimaging studies. 83, 142–147 (2014).
- Mohammadi, M.-R., Amini, H., Kaviani, H. & Shabani, A. %J I. J. P. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID): Persian translation and cultural adaptation. 2, 46 (2007).
- First, M. B. %J B. R. D. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders. (1997).
- First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M. & Williams, J. B. W. User’s guide for the Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders SCID-I: clinician version. (American Psychiatric Pub, 1997).
- First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M. & Williams, J. B. W. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition. (SCID-I/P New York, NY, 2002).
- SHARIFI, V. et al. RELIABILITY AND FEASIBILITY OF THE PERSIAN VERSION OF THE STRUCTURED DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW FOR DSM-IV (SCID). 6, (2004).
- Maffei, C. et al. Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID-II), version 2.0. 11, 279–284 (1997).
- Group, W. H. O. A. W. %J A. The alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. 97, 1183–1194 (2002).
- Humeniuk, R. et al. Validation of the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST). (2008).
- Pfohl, B. et al. Reliability and Validity of the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (Best): A Self-Rated Scale to Measure Severity and Change in Persons With Borderline Personality Disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders 23, 281–293 (2009).
- Azizi, M. R. et al. Validity and reliability of Persian translation of the Borderline Evaluation of Severity over Time (BEST) questionnaire. 33, 133 (2019).
- Davis, M. H. %J P. & Bulletin, S. P. Empathic concern and the muscular dystrophy telethon: Empathy as a multidimensional construct. 9, 223–229 (1983).
- Davis, M. H. %J J. of personality & psychology, social. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. 44, 113 (1983).
- Davis, M. H. %J J. of personality. The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach. 51, 167–184 (1983).
- Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Lotfi, S., Chen Cognition, Z. %J I. & Personality. Moral affects, empathy, and integrative self-knowledge in Iran. 34, 39–56 (2014).
- Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A. & Taylor, G. J. %J J. of psychosomatic research. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale—I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. 38, 23–32 (1994).
- Bagby, M., Taylor, G. J., Ryan, D. %J P. & Psychosomatics. Toronto Alexithymia Scale: Relationship with personality and psychopathology measures. 45, 207–215 (1986).
- Besharat, M. A. %J I. J. of M. S. Psychometric characteristics of Persian version of the Toronto alexithymia scale-20 in clinical and non-clinical samples. 33, 1–6 (2008).
- Besharat, M. A. %J P. reports. Reliability and factorial validity of a Farsi version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale with a sample of Iranian students. 101, 209–220 (2007).
- Chao-Gan, Y. & Yu-Feng, Z. DPARSF: a MATLAB toolbox for “pipeline” data analysis of resting-state fMRI. Frontiers in systems neuroscience 4, (2010).
- Chiang, S., Stern, J. M., Engel Jr, J., Levin, H. S. & Haneef, Z. Differences in graph theory functional connectivity in left and right temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy research 108, 1770–1781 (2014).
- Ting, C.-M., Ombao, H., Samdin, S. B. & Salleh, S.-H. Estimating dynamic connectivity states in fMRI using regime-switching factor models. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 37, 1011–1023 (2017).
- Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15, 273–289 (2002).
- van den Heuvel, M. P. et al. Proportional thresholding in resting-state fMRI functional connectivity networks and consequences for patient-control connectome studies: Issues and recommendations. Neuroimage 152, 437–449 (2017).
- Fornito, A., Zalesky, A. & Bullmore, E. T. Network scaling effects in graph analytic studies of human resting-state fMRI data. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 4, 1–16 (2010).
- Fornito, A. et al. Genetic influences on cost-efficient organization of human cortical functional networks. Journal of Neuroscience 31, 3261–3270 (2011).
- Oldham, S. et al. Consistency and differences between centrality measures across distinct classes of networks. PloS one 14, e0220061 (2019).
- Bullmore, E. & Sporns, O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10, 186 (2009).
- Amiri, S., Arbabi, M., Kazemi, K., Parvaresh-Rizi, M. & Mirbagheri, M. M. Characterization of brain functional connectivity in treatment-resistant depression. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 111, 110346 (2021).
- Rueda, D. F., Calle, E. & Marzo, J. L. Robustness comparison of 15 real telecommunication networks: Structural and centrality measurements. Journal of Network and Systems Management 25, 269–289 (2017).
- Amiri, S. et al. Graph theory application with functional connectivity to distinguish left from right temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Research 167, 106449 (2020).
- Amiri, S. et al. Brain functional connectivity in individuals with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES): An application of graph theory. Epilepsy & Behavior 114, 107565 (2021).
- Bullmore, E. & Sporns, O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature reviews neuroscience 10, 186 (2009).
- Nichols, T. E. & Holmes, A. P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Human brain mapping 15, 1–25 (2002).
- Mijalkov, M. et al. BRAPH: A graph theory software for the analysis of brain connectivity. PloS one 12, e0178798 (2017).
- Yang, X., Hu, L., Zeng, J., Tan, Y. & Cheng, B. %J S. reports. Default mode network and frontolimbic gray matter abnormalities in patients with borderline personality disorder: a voxel-based meta-analysis. 6, 1–10 (2016).
- Visintin, E. et al. Mapping the brain correlates of borderline personality disorder: a functional neuroimaging meta-analysis of resting state studies. 204, 262–269 (2016).
- Baczkowski, B. M. et al. Deficient amygdala–prefrontal intrinsic connectivity after effortful emotion regulation in borderline personality disorder. 267, 551–565 (2017).
- Silbersweig, D. et al. Failure of frontolimbic inhibitory function in the context of negative emotion in borderline personality disorder. 164, 1832–1841 (2007).
- Kraus, N. & Chandrasekaran, B. %J N. reviews neuroscience. Music training for the development of auditory skills. 11, 599–605 (2010).
- Ruocco, A. C., Amirthavasagam, S., Choi-Kain, L. W. & McMain, S. F. %J B. psychiatry. Neural correlates of negative emotionality in borderline personality disorder: an activation-likelihood-estimation meta-analysis. 73, 153–160 (2013).
- Smoski, M. J. et al. Functional imaging of emotion reactivity in opiate-dependent borderline personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment 2, 230–241 (2011).
- Schulze, L., Schmahl, C. & Niedtfeld, I. %J B. psychiatry. Neural correlates of disturbed emotion processing in borderline personality disorder: a multimodal meta-analysis. 79, 97–106 (2016).
- Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Smallwood, J. & Spreng, R. N. %J A. of the N. Y. A. of S. The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. 1316, 29 (2014).
- Kraus, A. et al. Script-driven imagery of self‐injurious behavior in patients with borderline personality disorder: A pilot FMRI study. 121, 41–51 (2010).
- Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Saxe, R. & Yarkoni, T. %J N. Contributions of episodic retrieval and mentalizing to autobiographical thought: evidence from functional neuroimaging, resting-state connectivity, and fMRI meta-analyses. 91, 324–335 (2014).
- Bush, G., Luu, P. & Posner, M. I. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 215–222 (2000).
- Weissman, D. H., Roberts, K. C., Visscher, K. M. & Woldorff, M. G. %J N. neuroscience. The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. 9, 971–978 (2006).
- Nee, D. E., Wager, T. D. & Jonides, J. Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 7, 1–17 (2007).
- Wager, T. D. & Smith, E. E. Neuroimaging studies of working memory. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 3, 255–274 (2003).
- Dosenbach, N. U. F. et al. A Core System for the Implementation of Task Sets. Neuron 50, 799–812 (2006).
- Seeley, W. W. et al. Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control. 27, 2349–2356 (2007).
- Petersen, S. E. & Posner, M. I. %J A. review of neuroscience. The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. 35, 73–89 (2012).
- Niendam, T. A. et al. Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 12, 241–268 (2012).
- Menon, V. & Uddin, L. Q. Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function 214, 655–667 (2010).
- Menon, V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15, 483–506 (2011).
- Fichtenholtz, H. M. et al. Emotion–attention network interactions during a visual oddball task. 20, 67–80 (2004).
- Carlsson, K. et al. Fear and the amygdala: manipulation of awareness generates differential cerebral responses to phobic and fear-relevant (but nonfeared) stimuli. 4, 340 (2004).
- Lane, R. D., Fink, G. R., Chau, P. M.-L. & Dolan, R. J. %J N. Neural activation during selective attention to subjective emotional responses. 8, 3969–3972 (1997).
- Taylor, S. F., Phan, K. L., Decker, L. R. & Liberzon, I. %J N. Subjective rating of emotionally salient stimuli modulates neural activity. 18, 650–659 (2003).
- Hutcherson, C. A. et al. Attention and emotion: does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films? 27, 656–668 (2005).
- Kim, D.-Y. & Lee, J.-H. Are posterior default-mode networks more robust than anterior default-mode networks? Evidence from resting-state fMRI data analysis. Neuroscience Letters 498, 57–62 (2011).
No competing interests reported.