Malignant mesothelioma is a highly invasive disease, which originates from mesothelium, such as pleura, peritoneum, pericardium and so on. The most common is malignant pleural mesothelioma, accounting for about 80%,while malignant mesothelioma of the diaphragm is extremely rare[8]. The history of asbestos exposure is closely related to the occurrence of pleural mesotheliomas, but mesotheliomas in peritoneum, liver, diaphragm, and other organs have no obvious relationship with asbestos exposure history[9, 10].On the other hand, although the asbestos has been banned for decades in many countries, epidemiologists predict the malignant mesothelioma epidemic will last past 2040, raising many concerns in public health given its late diagnosis, dismal prognosis, and lack of current effective therapies[11, 12].Malignant mesothelioma can be divided into localized type and diffuse type according to the growth mode, and the prognosis of localized type is slightly better[13]. This patient is a rare case of localized malignant mesothelioma originating from the diaphragm.
These patients typically present with dyspnea in early stages.Then, as disease progresses, patients also complain of chest pain. The diagnosis is often made by thoracentesis as most patients have pleural fluid, which is positive for malignancy in 30% to 50% of patients.Computed tomography (CT) of the thorax and positron emission tomography scans is helpful in characterizing the tumor and its stage[3].The clinical prognosis for malignant mesothelioma is poor. Patients presenting with vague symptoms such as chest tightness and breathlessness should not be overlooked for lung pathology[14]. There was no obvious abnormality in the chest X-ray of this patient for one year. The space occupying of the left diaphragm was not found until the CT was completed before admission.Therefore, combined with the clinical manifestations of patients, early use of CT or MRI to improve chest tomography may be more beneficial to early diagnosis.
Currently, the incidence of primary tumor of the diaphragm is lower compared with that of secondary diaphragm tumor.Studies that explored primary diaphragm tumor previously are mainly case reports, and only a few systematic retrospective studies have been reported.Therefore the data is limited.There is no clear process or guideline for treatment of primary diaphragm tumor because of the low incidence, the various types of the disease, and the complex anatomic structures[15].Surgery is one part of multimodality treatment with resection of the diaphragmatic pleura or complete resection of the diaphragm to achieve macroscopic complete resection[16].When resecting diaphragmatic tumors the margins must be resected until negative even if this requires resection a moderate portion of the diaphragmatic surface.There are many ways to deal with the defective diaphragm in the world, which should be arranged according to the size and data of the defect[17, 18].The eight patients with malignant mesothelioma simply originating from the diaphragm mentioned above were all treated with surgery. Only one of the eight patients died of reexamination and metastasis during the two-year follow-up. One of them also had tumor recurrence during the postoperative follow-up, but the patient regained long-term survival after radiotherapy and chemotherapy.This patient was diagnosed as malignant tumor by thoracoscopy. Therefore, the diaphragm within about 8cm around the tumor pedicle was surgically removed, and the diaphragm patch was used to repair the defect. The patient received regular chemotherapy in the oncology department after surgery, and was followed up for five years, without any recurrence of the tumor, and without any discomfort.
For the symptoms of chest tightness and air tightness, excluding cardiopulmonary diseases, the primary tumor of diaphragm can not be ignored. At the same time, for the malignant mesothelioma of diaphragm, perhaps surgery combined with postoperative regular chemotherapy, patients may be able to obtain a better and longer-term survival.