Materials
Fresh rice bran (Oryza sativa L.) with 8% degree of milling was obtained from a local rice processing factory in Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand. The bran was immediately passed through a 750 µm (20 mesh) sieve to separate foreign materials, packed into a polyethylene bag and stored at -20°C in a freezer. The initial moisture content of the bran sample was determined by AOAC (2000).
Purified soybean oil as the solvent was purchased from a local supermarket (Bangkok, Thailand). The tocol and γ-oryzanol contents in the soybean oil and raw rice bran sample were determined before experimentation.
Chemicals and reagents
Standard tocols including α-tocopherol, δ-tocopherol, γ-tocopherol and γ-tocotrienol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Standard γ-oryzanol was purchased from Tsuno Food Industrial Co., Ltd. (Wakayama, Japan). Methanol (HPLC grade) and n-butanol were purchased from BHD (Poole, UK). All chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade.
Ohmic heating-assisted ultrasound extraction with soybean oil
Ohmic heating was used as a pretreatment to assist ultrasound extraction of tocols and γ-oryzanol from rice bran using soybean oil as a solvent. In previous studies by Loypimai et al. (2009 and 2015), deionized water was sprayed directly into the rice bran sample to increase the 30% (wet basis) moisture content. Each moisturized bran sample (180 g) was ohmically-treated at two levels of electric field strengths (E=100 and 200 V/cm). During ohmic heating of the rice bran, the voltage, current and temperature were continuously recorded using a data logger controller (Digicon, DP-74SD). When the coldest point of the bran reached 105°C, this temperature was held for 1 min before removing the bran from the chamber and cooling to room temperature.
Ohmically-treated bran samples were extracted for tocols and γ-oryzanol by ultrasound using soybean oil as a green solvent (OH-UASO), following the procedure of Loypimai et al. (2020) with slight modifications. Briefly, 40 g of the ohmically-treated bran sample were added to a beaker containing 200 mL of soybean oil. The mixture was then subjected to radiation using an ultrasound (VCX 500 Vibra-CellTM, Sonics & Materials Inc., USA) equipped with a titanium microprobe (diameter 13 mm, length 136 mm, weight 340 g) (model CV334, USA). Parameters including amplitude levels and solution temperature were set at 40% and 65°C, with power of 500 W at 20 kHz following our previous study (Loypimai et al., 2020). During the extraction process, the solution temperature in pulse mode was measured continuously using a probe controller. After ultrasonic extraction, the mixture was filtered twice through a vacuum pump (Buchi, Switzerland) using Whatman No. 4 filter paper and centrifuged at 6,000 x g for 10 min to obtain the enriched oil sample. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Untreated rice bran and bran steamed with an autoclave (ACV-3167 IWAKI) at 115°C were included as controls. The inside temperature of the sample was raised to 105°C, held for 1 min, then removed from the chamber and cooled to ambient temperature. Untreated bran and conventionally treated bran were then subjected to ultrasound soybean oil extraction and defined as UB-UASO and CB-UASO, following the same procedure used for tocols and γ-oryzanol.
Color measurement
Colors of the enriched oils obtained from the different extraction methods were determined using a Colorimeter (Minolta, model CR400, Japan) and calibrated before each analysis with white and black standard tiles. Color readings were expressed following the CIELAB system for L* (darkness to lightness), a* (green to red) and b* (blue to yellow). The L*, a* and b* values were also used to calculate total color change (ΔE).
HPLC analysis for tocols and γ-oryzanol
The solvent (soybean oil), raw rice bran and enriched oils obtained from the different methods were analyzed for tocol and γ-oryzanol contents using an HPLC-PDA apparatus following the method of Gimeno et al. (2001) with slight modifications. Each oil extract sample (0.5 g) was added to 5.0 mL of n-hexane and homogenized for 1 min using a vortex mixer. The mixture was then filtrated through a 0.45 µm nylon syringe filter (Whatman, USA) and separated on a C18 analytical column (Phenomenex 4 µm, C18, 150×4.6 mm) with temperature controlled at 45°C, protected by a security guard column (Phenomenex 4 µm, C18, 50×4.6 mm). The mobile phase solvent under gradient elution was methanol: water: 1-butanol (92: 4: 4 (%v/v)) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min for 12 min. The mobile phase was then changed to methanol: water: 1-butanol (92: 3: 5 (%v/v)) at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min for 25 min. Total gradient run time was 25 min before returning to the initial condition. The eluent band was monitored using a UV absorbance detector set at 292 nm for α-tocopherol, δ-tocopherol and γ-tocopherol and 325 nm for γ-oryzanol. Tocols and γ-oryzanol in the test sample were verified by comparing retention times with the reference standards. The increases in tocols or γ-oryzanol contents in the enriched oils were calculated as follows:

Antioxidant activity analysis
The oil extract was prepared for antioxidant activity analysis following the method reported by Loypimai et al. (2015). Briefly, the sample (1.0 g) was dissolved in 5 mL of mixture solvents (methanol: hexane, 3:2) by placing the mixture on a sonicator (Vibra-Cell™, 130 W, 20 kHz) for 5 min, followed by evaporating in a rotary evaporator to remove the solvent. The residue was then dissolved in 2 mL of methanol and antioxidant activity was analyzed using three different chemical assays based on diverse food system mechanisms.
Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)
DPPH radical-scavenging activity was evaluated using a UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (G10S UV-Vis model, Thermo Fisher Scientific, China). The values were calculated as the concentration of the sample providing 50% of inhibition activity (IC50) (Dasgupta and De, 2004).
Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)
Reducing power of the extract was determined by the capacity to convert Fe3+-TPTZ to a blue-colored Fe2+-TPTZ (Benzie and Strain, 1996). Absorbance was then measured at 539 nm, with results expressed in µmol FeSO4 equivalent/g enriched oil sample.
Total antioxidant capacity (TAC)
TAC assay was determined following the method of Dasgupta and De (2004). The result was expressed as the number of standard synthetic gallic acid equivalent/g enriched oil sample.
Chemical quality analysis
Changes in chemical quality of the enriched oil samples obtained from the different extraction methods during storage at room temperature were determined by AOCS (1997), and results were compared to commercial soybean oil.
Free fatty acids (FFA) were measured by titration of the sample (1.0 g) with alkali and calculated as oleic acid (AOCS Cd 3a-63).
The peroxide value (PV) was determined by titrating the oil sample (0.5 g) with sodium thiosulfate solution (AOCS Cd 8-53).
Thiobarbituric acid (TBA) was measured by heating a 5 mL aliquot of a solution of sample (50–200 mg) in 25 mL 1-butanol with 5 mL TBA reagent at 95°C for 120 min, and reading the absorbance at 530 nm (AOCS, 1997). All determinations were carried out in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using F-test (one-way ANOVA) with a statistical package program (SPSS trial version). Results were reported as mean values and standard deviations from triplicate samples of each treatment for all experiments. Duncan’s multiple range test was performed to determine significant differences between treatments, with statistical significance declared at p<0.05.