Testicular tissues histological characteristics of nine samples
Compared with cattle and yaks, the testicular tissues sections of cattle-yak showed that seminiferous tubules were highly vacuolated and the walls became thinner. Opposite with cattle and yak(Fig.1 A,B), the area of the longitudinal section of testis were expanded and there are few germ cells or spermatocytes can be seen in the seminiferous tubules of cattle-yak (Fig.1 C).
Quality control of sequencing data
The raw data of fastq format was removed 3’ adaptors with cutadapt under specific settings parameters. Then the trimmomatic software was used to filter the low-quality reads and clean reads were converted to fasta format. There were 3,192,697 to 6,617,422 unique clean reads generated with filtering the low-quality reads and covering the repeated reads. The GC percentage of these reads was from 46.31% to 49.29%, and all the Q30 values of these reads were surpass to 96%. All the clean data of each sample can be used to reads mapping and further analysis (Table 1).
Table 1. The statistics results of clean data
Sample
|
Reads count
|
Unique count
|
Bases count
|
Average length
|
Q20
|
Q30
|
GC percentage
|
h1
|
12,855,276
|
3,351,413
|
360,561,690
|
28.05
|
97.87%
|
96.54%
|
47.02%
|
h2
|
12,886,450
|
3,783,343
|
367,250,682
|
28.5
|
97.78%
|
96.38%
|
46.35%
|
h3
|
15,070,070
|
4,342,944
|
424,855,422
|
28.19
|
97.76%
|
96.34%
|
46.31%
|
m1
|
10,694,999
|
3,881,169
|
278,614,344
|
26.05
|
97.78%
|
96.40%
|
48.41%
|
m2
|
12,384,809
|
4,380,294
|
331,397,620
|
26.76
|
97.68%
|
96.22%
|
47.51%
|
m3
|
14,831,950
|
5,470,038
|
382,097,489
|
25.76
|
97.72%
|
96.32%
|
47.80%
|
p1
|
13,443,245
|
4,640,237
|
347,901,405
|
25.88
|
97.84%
|
96.52%
|
48.62%
|
p2
|
14,979,305
|
6,617,422
|
392,403,979
|
26.2
|
97.80%
|
96.44%
|
48.67%
|
p3
|
12,329,720
|
3,192,697
|
317,680,881
|
25.77
|
97.82%
|
96.47%
|
49.29%
|
Reads mapping and filtration
Clean reads were mapped to the bovine reference genome, exon sequence and intron sequence. The reads that can be mapped to the reference genome and cannot be mapped to the exon sequence were persevered. In addition, blastn was used to aligned the reads to the Rfam database (rRNA, snRNA, snoRNA, tRNA) and then filtered the mapped reads (Supplementary table1).
The miRNA family and expression level analysis
After filtering the reads that did not belong to miRNAs, the mirDeep2 was used to predict the novel miRNA and secondary structure of miRNAs. After quantification of miRNAs, we analyzed the miRNA family to further understand the function of miRNAs to their target genes (Fig 2). Then these counts were normalized with RPM. The RPM distribution of nine samples can be seen as the RPM boxplot (Fig 3. a). At the same time, we analysis the principal component of nine samples and the cattle, yak and cattle-yak can be divided into H, M and P groups (Fig 3. b). With the miRNA expression levels of each sample, we further analyzed the correlation among three samples in one group and the distance among three groups, the samples of each group were highly relevant and the distance among three groups was obvious (Fig 4).
Differential expression analysis of miRNA among nine samples
The R package edgeR was used to analyze the differential miRNA expression among nine samples with CPM >1, p-value < 0.05, |log2FoldChange|>1. And then the clustering analysis and differentially expression of H vs P and M vs P were then pictured with heatmap (Fig 5). There were 81(47 up-regulated and 34 down-regulated) and 37(16 up-regulated and 21 down-regulated) differentially expressed miRNAs in H vs P and M vs P, respectively (Fig 6). The list of differentially expressed miRNAs can be seen as Supplementary table2. Then, we consolidate the common up-regulated and down-regulated miRNAs of cattle-yak in the merged analysis of H vs P and M vs P (Fig 7). We plan to study the function of common miRNAs to their target genes next step and further understand the mechanism of male sterility.
Functional enrichment and network analysis
With the list of the differentially expressed miRNA of H vs P and M vs P, we use miRanda software to predict their target genes. In H vs P group, there are 6 up-regulated miRNAs and 1 down-regulated miRNA in cattle can be predicted their target genes (Table 2). Besides, M vs P group filtered 2 up-regulated and 3 down-regulated miRNA in yak can target the protein coding genes and further regulate the associated signaling pathways (Table 3). We also observed that bta-miR-7 is commonly down regulated in cattle-yak between H vs P and M vs P, the predicted target genes MYRFL, FANCA, INSL3, USP9X, SHF may play decisive roles in leading to the male-sterility of cattle-yak (Fig 7). After target prediction, we carried out GO and KEGG enrichment analysis to understand the function of the predicted coding genes. With three aspects (molecular function, biological process, cellular component) of GO enrichment, we selected top 10 GO terms to describe the function of these genes, we found that the up-regulated genes of cattle most engaged in the negative regulation of ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process (GO:2000059), positive regulation of cell migration (GO:0030335), thiol−dependent ubiquitinyl hydrolase activity (GO:0036459) and positive regulation of mitochondrial DNA replication (GO:0090297). Besides, KEGG enrichment analysis demonstrated that these target genes most enriched in cell cycle (bta04110), RNA transport(bta03013), PI3K−Akt signaling pathway(bta04151), Focal adhesion (bta04510) pathways. On the other hand, the up-regulated genes in yak are most enriched in the DNA-binding transcription factor activity (GO:0003700), positive regulation of DNA demethylation (GO:1901537), protein deubiquitination (GO:0016579), zinc ion binding (GO:0008270) terms and relaxin signaling pathway (bta04926), RNA polymerase (bta03020) pathways, such the up-regulated GO terms and pathways in cattle and yak may positively participate in the reproductive processes (Fig 8. A-D). With the analysis of miR-7 target genes function annotation, we found these genes enriched in hormone activity, signaling receptor binding and activator activity, molecular function regulator process, Fanconi anemia pathway and relaxing signaling pathway that associated with hormone secretion and signal transduction (Fig 8. E-F). At the same time, we performed Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to annotate and interpret enrichment results of set of DEGs, in order to characterize the function of DEGs more accurately. We found that the gene sets of cattle enriched in the ATP binding, reproduction and developmental process involved in reproduction processes and focal adhesion, olfactory transduction and MAPK signaling pathway in H vs P group. Likewise, the gene sets of yaks are most involved in the ATP binding, DNA binding and reproduction processes, as well as the cytokine receptor interaction and MAPK signaling pathways (Fig 9.) We also found that the positive regulation of cell migration (GO:0030335), negative regulation of cell adhesion (GO:0007162), SMAD2-SMAD3 protein complex processes, PIK3R1 gene, SMAD2 gene, relaxion signaling pathway (bta-04926) and cellular senescence (bta04218) were located in the center of GO and KEGG regulatory network of H vs P DE miRNAs target genes (Fig.10 A-C). Similarly, in the M vs P DE target genes GO and KEGG regulatory network, membrane raft (GO:0045121) process and focal adhesion (bta04510) pathways were in the central location. ITGB3 gene connected many pathways and formed the network, revealed the essential role of this hub genes (Fig.10 D-F). All the enrichment results demonstrated that the male sterility of cattle-yak may associated with lack of the regulation of such processes.
Table 2 The list of differentially expressed miRNA and their target genes of H vs P.
MiRNA id
|
Regulated
|
Target genes
|
bta-miR-122
|
up
|
HFE, CD151, SEMA4D, ADAMTS14,
|
bta-miR-146a
|
up
|
YTHDF2
|
bta-miR-184
|
up
|
EIF2S2, C7H5orf15, STOML2, FGFR1OP,
|
bta-miR-34c
|
up
|
ESPL1, KDM6A, THBS2, BCORL1, ZNF568, ALKAL2,
|
bta-miR-7
|
up
|
MYRFL, FANCA, INSL3, USP9X, SHF
|
bta-miR-93
|
up
|
SUFU, LOC789812, LOC789787, RALGAPA1, SEPHS1, NETO2, TMEM187, USP32, STOX2, RPAP2
|
bta-miR-455-3p
|
down
|
SMAD2, CAMKV, LDAH, GREB1, ANKS6, XRN1, CLEC7A, PIK3R1, PHF7, LOC787074, SPHK2, LINS1, MKRN3, IFIT3, RPAP2, TRPM2, ZNF217
|
Table 3 The list of differentially expressed miRNA and their target genes of M vs P.
MiRNA id
|
Regulated
|
Target genes
|
bta-miR-31
|
up
|
SUPT4H1, TWISTNB, ITGB1BP2, MICAL2, USP34, NR5A2, LOC112445404, DIS3
|
bta-miR-7
|
up
|
MYRFL, FANCA, INSL3, USP9X, SHF
|
bta-miR-193b
|
down
|
BTK, CALU, SLC39A5, GPR61, SLC25A19, USP21, GJC2, POLR3GL, RBFOX3, SERPINB9, ANKRD54, WFIKKN2, ACBD6
|
bta-miR-196b
|
down
|
POC1A, LCAT, IMPDH1
|
bta-miR-34a
|
down
|
HK1, GPAA1, SLA, IRF3, EIF2B4, SERPINB8, GSTT2, TMLHE, SLC13A4, MGC133764, MRTO4, CDK18, FBH1, EXTL1, INPP5K, RIMS2, RGCC, LYPD5, ZNF771, CDC73, GSC, PRSS12, SS18L2, LRRC8E, TNR, BAHD1, ITGB3, NRDE2, NTN5, CYP2D14, ADRB1, SZT2, CCNJL, SIGLEC1, SPEN, LOC530348, RTP3, CRYBG1, TMEM229B, HSPA14, CNNM2, FAM120B, CABIN1, LOC525426, MAP4, C18H19orf84, ATRNL1, STOX2, CHADL, RIMS4
|
3.6 qPCR validation
To confirm the relative expression levels of DE miRNAs and their target genes were consistent with the RNA-seq results, we selected the DE miRNA bta-miR-449a, the target genes FANCA, MYRFL and SHF of bta-miR-7 to perform the qPCR validation. We found that the miR-449a relative expression of cattle-yak was significantly lower than cattle and yak. And the target genes expression levels of FANCA, MYRFL and SHF were significantly up-regulated in cattle-yak, which is consistent with the lower expression of cattle-yak and negative regulation of bta-miR-7(Fig 11).