Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A combined cardiopulmonary exercise test –echocardiographic study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1617348/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A combined cardiopulmonary exercise test –echocardiographic study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1617348/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Purpose: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), documented in a significant portion of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, has been shown to adversely impact prognosis. In most HCM patients congestive symptoms are consistently elicited by exercise, thus suggesting the need for a provocative test to assess cardiac hemodynamics during effort. Combining cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with echocardiography, we aimed to evaluate the presence of exercise induced pulmonary arterial hypertension (EiPAH), its role in functional limitation and its prognostic significance in a cohort of patients with obstructive and non-obstructive HCM.

Methods: study population included 182 HCM patients evaluated combining CPET and stress echocardiography. Left-ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocities, trans-tricuspid gradient, and cardiopulmonary variables were continuously measured.

Results: Thirty-seven patients (20%) developed EiPAH, defined as systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP)>40 mmHg during exercise. EiPAH was associated with lower exercise performance, larger left atrial volumes, higher LVOT gradient and higher VE/VCO₂ slope. At multivariable analysis baseline sPAP (p<0.0001) and baseline LVOT obstruction (p=0.028) were significantly associated with EiPAH. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed EiPAH was a significant predictor of HCM-related morbidity (Hazard Ratio: 6.21, 95% CI 1.47-26.19; p=0.05; 4.21 ,95% CI 1.94-9.12; p<0.001 for the primary and the secondary endpoint respectively).

Conclusion: EiPAH was present in about one fifth of HCM patients without evidence of elevated pulmonary pressures at rest and was associated with adverse clinical outcome. Diagnosing EiPAH by exercise echocardiography/CPET may help physicians to detect early stage of PAH thus allowing a closer clinical monitoring and individualized therapies

Pulmonary arterial hypertension

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

cardiopulmonary exercise test

exercise induced pulmonary arterial hypertension

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inheritable cardiomyopathy, characterized by cardiac hypertrophy in the absence of an identifiable hemodynamic etiology.¹ Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), can be found in about 11% of HCM subjects and has been shown to adversely impact prognosis.^2–3 According to the classic paradigm, elevation of pulmonary pressures in HCM is attributable to chronic increase of left-sided diastolic pressures, which may be due to multiple concurrent causes, including diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, with or without secondary mitral regurgitation, as well as varying degrees of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.^4–5 In a recently published cohort of 162 obstructive HCM subjects in whom systolic pulmonary artery pressures (sPAP) were measured invasively, however, 11% met the hemodynamic criteria for precapillary PAH, suggesting a concurring role of primary changes in pulmonary vascular resistance at least in a subset of patients.⁶

In most HCM patients, despite normal pulmonary pressures at rest, congestive symptoms are consistently elicited by exercise, suggesting the need for provocative test to assess cardiac hemodynamics during effort. Exercise-induced PAH (EiPAH) is defined by a mean sPAP > 30 mmHg on exercise, measured invasively, in the presence of normal resting pulmonary hemodynamics.^7,8 However, sPAP may now be reliably estimated non-invasively by echocardiography. Previous works on exercise echocardiography have validated a sPAP of 40 mmHg as a cut off for identifying EiPAH.^9,10 Notably, EiPAH has been shown to precede the development of manifest disease in primary PAH and in PAH secondary to connective tissue disease.¹¹ It has also been established that abnormalities in pulmonary hemodynamics are a cardinal feature of exercise limitation in both Heart Failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).¹² However, limited data are available regarding EiPAH and its role in determining functional impairment in HCM.¹³ In the present study, combining cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with echocardiography, we therefore aimed to evaluate the presence of EiPAH, its role in functional limitation and its prognostic significance in a cohort of patients with obstructive and non-obstructive HCM.

Study design and population studied

Between March 2005 and November 2015, 235 patients with HCM referred to our tertiary referral center (Ospedale San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy) underwent combined CPET and stress echocardiography. Diagnosis of HCM was made according to current guidelines (1) based on the demonstration of a hypertrophied (wall thickness ≥ 15 mm), non-dilated left ventricle in the absence of other cardiac or systemic diseases capable of producing a similar degree of hypertrophy. Patients were excluded if they were in permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) or unable to exercise due to advanced age or heart failure (HF) symptoms resulting from the “end-stage” phase of HCM with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%), or if they had prior history of septal myectomy or alcohol septal ablation. Patients with prior documentation of ventricular tachyarrhythmia on effort or exertional syncope were also excluded. In 26 cases sPAP could not be sampled during baseline echocardiographic evaluation, while in 14 additional patients sPAP could not be measured at peak exercise for technical reasons (poor acoustic window). Ten subjects presented baseline sPAP > 36 mmHg, therefore leading to the diagnosis of resting PAH. Therefore, 50 of the initial 235 subjects (21%) were excluded from the present analysis. Three additional patients did not have follow-up visits. Accordingly, the final study population included 182 HCM patients (35% females, mean age 47.5 ± 15.9). All subjects were in sinus rhythm at the time of enrollment.

The study conforms to the principles of the Helsinki declaration and the local institutional review boards approved the study protocol. Study participants gave informed consent to participate.

Exercise echocardiography and cardiopulmonary test

A comprehensive baseline echocardiogram was performed at rest with a Vivid 7 ultrasound system (GE Ultrasound, Norway). Diastolic function was assessed according to current guideline.¹⁴ Symptom-limited CPET was then performed on a bicycle ergometer in the upright position, using a 10 Watt per minute ramp protocol. All patients maintained preexisting pharmacological treatment. Cardiopulmonary variables, oxygen uptake (VO₂ ml/min) and carbon dioxide production (CO₂ ml/min), were continuously measured with breath-by-breath analysis. Prior to each test, the equipment was calibrated using reference gases. Oxygen saturation monitoring was performed by pulse oximetry. Twelve-lead ECG, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at rest and at each exercise step.

An abnormal blood pressure response was defined by either a failure of systolic blood pressure to rise > 20 mmHg or any fall in systolic blood pressure during exercise. Peak oxygen uptake (peak VO₂) was defined as the highest VO₂ level achieved during the final 30 s of the exercise test. The peak VO₂ was expressed as an absolute value per unit of body weight (ml/kg/min) and as percentage of predicted value. Anaerobic threshold (AT) was determined by the V-slope method and by analysis of ventilatory equivalents (VE). Ventilatory efficiency, obtained dividing VE by CO₂ production, reflects the relation between pulmonary ventilation and perfusion during exercise.¹⁵ Exercise was considered adequate if the respiratory gas exchange ratio (RER) exceeded the value of 1.0. During CPET, LVOT velocities and trans-tricuspid gradient were measured during the last minute of each workload step. Non-invasive estimation of PAP was based upon a trans-tricuspid gradient calculated from the maximum velocity (V) of continuous Doppler tricuspid regurgitation taken from multiple views, using the modified Bernoulli formula. Estimated right atrial pressure (RAP) was determined from the size and collapsibility of the inferior vena cava. sPAP is the sum of right ventricular + right atrial pressure.¹⁶ All patients had continuous-wave Doppler assessment through the right ventricle outflow tract to exclude obstruction to flow. Immediately after each gradient was recorded, the degree of systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve (SAM) and mitral regurgitation were assessed in the apical and/or parasternal long-axis views. SAM was graded semi-quantitatively from 2-dimensional images or derived from M-mode recordings using a previously described grading system.¹⁷ At the end of exercise, all patients continued recovery phase standing on the bicycle while LVOT velocities and diastolic function were recorded every minute for 5 minutes. Echocardiographic measurements considered in the analysis were those obtained immediately post-exercise.¹⁸ All data were digitally stored, and measurements were made at completion of each study.

Study Endpoints and Patients follow-up

The primary endpoint for this study was a composite of all-cause death, heart transplantation or aborted sudden cardiac death. Appropriate discharges from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia were considered as sudden cardiac death equivalents. The secondary endpoint was defined as a composite of all-cause death, heart transplantation, aborted sudden cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke or hospitalization for decompensated HF. Follow-up was obtained by clinical visits and/or through telephone contacts. Referring cardiologists, general practitioners, and patients were contacted whenever necessary for further information.

Statistical analysis

All continuous variables were tested for normality using Shapiro-Wilk normality test and are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median [interquartile range (Q1-Q3)] as appropriate. Categorical variables are summarized as absolute frequency (percentage). Group differences were tested using unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney U test or Wilcoxon matched pair signed rank test. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to assess statistical dependence. Association between categorical variables was tested using Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. A p < 0.05 was considered significant. A multivariable regression analysis was then performed to identify the independent association with EiPAH. All variables significantly associated with the relevant outcome at baseline were included in the multivariable model. Cumulative rates of the primary or secondary endpoints were calculated by using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and the log-rank test was used for comparison across the groups.

General cardiopulmonary test and echocardiographic results

CPET results for the 182 HCM patients are summarized in Table 1. On average, they presented a reduced exercise tolerance with a median V0₂ peak 67% [57%-67%]. Mean test duration was 9 ± 3 minutes, with mean peak exercise reaching 90 Watts. Mean RER was 1.1 ± 0.1, with only 17 patients (9%) showing a RER < 1; median VE/VCO₂ slope was 27 [24–29]. The AT was reached in median at 55% of predicted peak VO₂. The blood pressure response was normal in the majority of patients, hypertensive and flat respectively in 6 and 2 patients (3% and 1%). No arrhythmias were recorded during exercise. Stress test was terminated because of exhaustion and/or dyspnea. There were no complications during the tests.

Echocardiographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Most notably, 129 (71%) subjects had some degree of diastolic dysfunction at baseline, with 55 (30%) having a moderate-to-severe dysfunction (grade II/III). At peak exercise, 153 (84%) subjects had evidence of diastolic dysfunction. Median baseline sPAP was 20 mmHg [20 mmHg-25 mmHg], while at peak exercise median sPAP was 25.5 mmHg [25 mmHg-35 mmHg]. Eighty-two patients (44%) presented LVOT obstruction (ΔP ≥ 30mmHg), which was present at rest in 41 patients and provokable in the remaining 41.

Prevalence and correlation of EiPAH with clinical and CPET/echocardiography parameters

Of the 182 study patients, 37 (20%) developed sPAP > 40 mmHg at peak exercise and therefore were considered to have EiPAH. Patients with EiPAH were more often females and were more likely to have LVOT obstruction (median peak LVOT gradient: 68 mmHg [20 mmHg – 100 mmHg] p < 0.001) than the 145 without EiPAH. Overall exercise performance was worse in EiPAH subjects in terms of peak Watts (70 Watts vs 100 Watts, p = 0.006) and exercise duration (8 ± 3 min vs 10 ± 3 min, p = 0.001) (Table 1). EiPAH was associated with higher VE/VCO₂ slope (28 [25–32] vs 26 [22–29], p = 0.005), (Fig. 2) larger left atrial volume index (LAVi) (37 ± 14 ml/m² vs 30 ± 12 ml/m² p = 0.003) and higher prevalence of moderate-to-severe or severe mitral regurgitation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, EiPAH patients had a higher baseline sPAP with respect to non EiPAH (30 [25–35] vs 20 [20–23], p < 0.001) (Table 1). Of the baseline echocardiographic characteristics and CPET parameters associated with EiPAH at univariate analysis (in particular LVOT gradient, VE/VCO2 slope, maximum Watts, baseline sPAP, LAVi and degree of diastolic dysfunction) only baseline sPAP (p < 0.0001) and baseline LVOT obstruction (p = 0.028) were significantly associated with the development of EiPAH in a multivariable model (Table 2).

Table 1: General clinical and instrumental findings.

Parameter	Study population (n=182)	EiPAH (n=37)	No EiPAH (n=145)	P value
Age	47.5 ± 15.9	48.0 ± 15.9	47.4 ± 13.8	0.809
Females, n (%)	64 (35.2)	20 (54.1)	44 (30.3)	0.007
BMI, kg/m²	25.9 ± 4.2	25.9 ± 3.9	25.9 ± 4.2	0.995
NYHA classification, n (%)				0.466
- Grade I	122 (67)	24 (64.9)	98 (67.6)
- Grade II	52 (28.6)	10 (27)	42 (29)
- Grade III	8 (4.4)	3 (8.1)	5 (3.4)
- Grade IV	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
B-Blockers, n (%)	86 (60)	16 (39)	70 (47)	0.40
ACEi, n (%)	21 (12)	6 (15)	15 (10)	0.43
Max LV thickness (mm)	20.88 ± 4.7	20.76 ± 5	21 ± 4.4	0.31
sPAP (mmHg)	20 [20 - 25]	30 [25 - 35]	20 [20 - 23]	< 0.001
Baseline TAPSE (mm)	21.4 ± 4.3	22.1 ± 5.4	21.2 ± 3.9	0.29
Peak sPAP (mmHg)	25.5 [25 - 35]	45 [40 - 49]	25 [25 - 30]	< 0.001
Peak TAPSE (mm)	25.8 ± 4.5	26.6 ± 5	25.6 ± 4.3	0.281
LVEF (%)	67.1 ± 7.6	64.5 ± 7.6	67.8 ± 7.4	0.019
Rest LVOT obstruction, n (%)	41 (22.2)	20 (52.6)	21 (14.3)	<0.001
Peak LVOT obstruction, n (%)	82 (44.3)	28 (73.7)	54 (36.7)	<0.001
Baseline LVOT gradient (mmHg)	10 [7 - 25]	27 [10 - 50]	10 [7 - 18]	<0.001
Peak LVOT gradient (mmHg)	25 [16-60]	68 [20 - 100]	22 [15 – 47]	< 0.001
LAVi (ml/m²)	31 ± 12	37 ± 14	30 ± 12	0.003
LAVi ≥ 34 ml/m², n (%)	59 (33)	40 (28.2)	19 (51.4)	0.008
Baseline mean E/e’	11.6 ± 5	14 ± 6.6	10.9 ± 4.3	0.001
Peak mean E/e’	11.3 ± 4	14 ± 4.2	10.6 ± 3.7	< 0.001
Baseline diastolic dysfunction, n (%)				0.008
- None	53 (29.1)	8 (21.6)	45 (31)
- Grade I	74 (40.7)	10 (27)	64 (44.1)
- Grade II	32 (17.6)	9 (24.3)	23 (15.9)
- Grade III	23 (12.6)	10 (27)	13 (9)
Peak diastolic dysfunction, n (%)				0.039
- None	29 (15.9)	5 (13.5)	24 (16.6)
- Grade I	73 (40.1)	10 (27)	63 (43.4)
- Grade II	52 (28.6)	11 (29.7)	41 (28.3)
- Grade III	28 (15.4)	11 (29.7)	17 (11.7)
Significant MR, n (%)	13 (7)	9 (24)	4 (2.7)	< 0.001
Baseline SBP (mmHg)	125 ± 17	125 ± 17	125 ± 17	0.577
Peak SBP (mmHg)	171 ± 29	164 ± 31	173 ± 28	0.069
RER	1.1 ± 0.11	1.10 ± 0.11	1.09 ± 0.11	0.501
Baseline HR	74 ± 14	70 ± 14	75 ± 13	0.056
Peak HR	125 ± 23	120 ± 24	127 ± 22	0.144
HR reserve (%)	0.64 ± 0.31	0.59 ± 0.23	0.66 ± 0.33	0.249
Watt	90 [70 - 120]	70 [60 - 100]	100 [80 - 120]	0.006
Exercise duration (min)	9 ± 3	8 ± 3	10 ± 3	0.001
Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min)	19 [15 - 23]	17 [14 - 22]	19 [15 - 23]	0.094
Peak VO2 (%)	67 [57 - 76]	67.5 [51.75 76.25]	67 [57.5 – 75.5]	0.867
HR/VO2 (BPM/ml)	12.9 ± 4.1	12 ± 4.1	13.2 ± 4.1	0.269
AT	53 ± 18	52 ± 19	54 ± 17	0.85
VE/VCO2	27 [24 - 29]	28 [25 - 32]	26 [22.2 - 29]	0.005

BMI, body mass index; NYHA, New York Heart Association; ACE-I, Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; LV, left ventricular wall thickness; sPAP, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane excursion; LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction; LAVi, left atrium volume index; LVOT, left ventricle outflow tract; MR, mitral regurgitation; E-wave, Doppler E wave; E/e′, E-wave-e′ wave ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate; VE/VCO2, ventilation/carbon dioxide slope; AT, anaerobic threshold; VO2, Oxygen consumption; RER = respiratory exchange ratio.

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of exercise induced pulmonary artery hypertension.
Variable	Univariate analysis		Multivariate logistic regression
Variable	OR (95% CI)	p-value	OR (95% CI)	p-value
Female	2.70 (1.29–5.64)	0.008
VE/VCO2	1.08 (1.01–1.15)	0.016
LAVi	1.04 (1.01–1.07)	0.005
Maximum Watts	0.98 (0.97–0.99)	0.019
Baseline sPAP	1.37 (1.24–1.51)	< 0.001	1.35 (1.21–1.50)	< 0.001
Baseline mean E/e’	1.11 (1.04–1.19)	0.002
Baseline LVOT gradient	1.04 (1.02–1.06)	< 0.001	1.03 (1.01–1.06)	0.028
Hosmer e Lemeshow test p = 0.065; AUC = 86 (95% CI 77–95); Nagelkerke R² = 53.1%
LAVi, left atrium volume index; LVOT, left ventricle outflow tract; VE/VCO2, ventilation/carbon dioxide slope; sPAP, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure.

Outcome

Mean follow up duration was 6.3 ± 1.9 years. The composite primary endpoint occurred in 8 (4.4%) patients during this time, while the secondary endpoint occurred in 30 (16.5%) (Table 3). During follow up EiPAH was significantly associated with cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality (0.7% vs 8% and 0.7% vs 10.8%; p < 0.001), HF hospitalization (2% vs 13.5%; p < 0.001) and with AF (6.2% vs 21.6%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for age and sex, EiPAH was significantly associated with the occurrence of primary and secondary endpoints (Fig. 1). Multivariable Hazard Ratio (HR) was 6.21 (95% confidence interval 1,47–26,19, p = 0.05) for the primary and 4.21 (95%CI 1.94–9.12, p < 0.001) for the secondary endpoint.

Table 3

Events at 5-year follow-up. During follow up EiPAH was significantly associated with cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, HF hospitalization and with atrial fibrillation.
Event	Total (n = 182)	EiPAH (n = 37)	No EiPAH (n = 145)	P
Composite primary endpoint, n (%)	8 (4.4)	4 (10.8)	4 (2.8)	0.05
- All-Cause death	5 (2.7)	4 (10.8)	1 (0.7)	< 0.001
(Of which CVD death)	4 (2.0)	3 (8.0)	1 (0.7)	< 0.001
- HTx	1 (0.5)	0 (0)	1 (0.7)
- Aborted SCD	2 (1.1)	1 (2.7)	1 (0.7)
Composite secondary endpoint, n (%)	30 (16.5)	13 (35.1)	17 (11.7)	0.001
- Atrial Fibrillation	17 (9.3)	8 (21.6)	9 (6.2)	< 0.001
- Nonfatal MI	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
- Nonfatal stroke	5 (2.7)	0 (0)	5 (3.4)
- HF hospitalization	8 (4.4)	5 (13.5)	3 (2.0)	< 0.001
CVD, cardiovascular death; HTx, heart transplant; SCD, sudden cardiac death; MI, myocardial infarction; HF, Heart failure, EiPAH, exercise induced pulmonary arterial hypertension

The present study assessed the prevalence and clinical significance of PAH occurring in response to exercise in a consecutive cohort of 182 HCM patients. The main findings can be summarized as follows: 1) after excluding patients with baseline sPAP > 36 mmHg (i.e. with resting PAH), one out of five HCM patients with normal estimated pulmonary pressures at rest developed EiPAH; 2) clinical predictors of EiPAH included higher baseline sPAP values and baseline LVOT gradient; EiPAH patients were also more likely to have left atrial dilatation and diastolic dysfunction. 3) EiPAH was associated with impaired functional capacity and predicted adverse outcome, defined by a composite endpoint including all-cause death, heart transplantation, aborted sudden cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke or hospitalization for decompensated HF. The primary endpoint of the study (all-cause death, heart transplantation or aborted sudden cardiac death) was not met, likely due to the paucity of events. Overall, these findings are consistent with – but expand the significance of - prior reports limited to resting PAH in both obstructive and non-obstructive HCM patients, showing a close association with diastolic dysfunction, LVOT obstruction and mitral regurgitation.¹⁹ Conversely, they are at odds with the study by Hatamami et al¹³ in which the degree of mitral regurgitation and LVOT obstruction did not correlate with EiPAH, probably due to an older study population with milder obstructive profile. The novel concept emerging from our study, however, is that static evaluation of hemodynamic balance at rest will substantially underestimate clinical frailty associated with provocable PAH. In the light of our findings, exercise echocardiography coupled with CPET represents an invaluable test to uncover early stages of PAH suggesting pending decompensation.

The mechanisms by which EiPAH develops in HCM remain incompletely understood. Over time diastolic dysfunction and mitral regurgitation due to SAM result in adverse atrial remodeling as elevated left ventricular and atrial pressures are passively transmitted to the pulmonary vasculature. Moreover, LVOT obstruction increases afterload, contributing to elevated left ventricular pressures. Ultimately, structural changes in the pulmonary vasculature of HCM patients may develop from long-standing elevations in left atrial pressures, as seen in other forms of post-capillary PAH.²⁰ Hence, dynamic assessment provided by exercise echo, combined with cardiopulmonary test, represents the most comprehensive approach to elucidate the individual pathophysiological determinants of functional intolerance in HCM patients.²¹

The importance of identifying EiPAH has been increasingly recognized in view of its prognostic role and therapeutic implications in several CV diseases.^22,23 We have now shown this to be the case also in HCM, consistent with a previous study in which EiPAH was an independent predictor of HCM related morbidity.¹³ The only other metabolic indicator associated with HCM was VE/VCO2, a parameter whose importance has already been emphasized in conditions characterized by diastolic dysfunction (i.e. HFpEF) resulting in impaired exercise tolerance, largely due to increased myocardial stiffness with retrograde increase in pulmonary pressures. As a consequence, an elevated VE/VC02 slope should be considered a red flag reflecting the mismatch between pulmonary ventilation and pulmonary perfusion.²³

The present results have clinical implications: HCM patients with normal estimated sPAP at rest should be routinely assessed, particularly when active and complaining of symptoms that cannot be readily explained by instrumental evaluation at rest. The combination of CPET and exercise echocardiography represents the gold standard of functional assessment in this disease, by allowing the simultaneous evaluation of LVOT gradients, diastolic reserve, mitral regurgitation, and pulmonary pressures during various phases of exercise and recovery, as well as VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope. HCM patients manifesting EiPAH should undergo further investigation to understand its mechanisms and should be considered for a careful clinical surveillance in order to optimize pharmacological treatment, plan invasive management when appropriate and prevent disease progression. Conversely, patients who maintain normal sPAP on exercise appear to be at low mid-term risk of heart failure-related events and adverse outcome. Although only a small minority of HCM centers perform simultaneous CPET and exercise echocardiography, such practice should be encouraged in the light of the wealth of information obtainable in individual patients.^24,25 Ideally, serial evaluations over time may increase predictive accuracy: this hypothesis needs systematic assessment in the future.

This was a single-center study, and its interpretation cannot be applied by default to the whole HCM population. The study used echocardiographic estimates of pulmonary pressures: as no invasive measure was obtained, we could not exclude PAH be due to a primary change in pulmonary vascular resistance. Nevertheless, such occurrence appears unlikely in HCM patients, and good agreement between echocardiographic and invasive measures of pulmonary pressures during upright exercise has already been shown among patients with high quality tricuspid Doppler signal.²⁶

EiPAH was present in about one fifth of HCM patients without evidence of elevated pulmonary pressures at rest and was associated with adverse clinical outcome. Diagnosing EiPAH by exercise echo/CPET may help physicians to detect early stage of PAH requiring a closer clinical monitoring and individualized treatment strategies.

Funding: The authors have no source of funding to declare

Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose

Ethical approval: This study had local institutional and ethics committee approval.

Informed consent: All patients provided written informed consent.

Consent to publish: Not applicable.

Ommen SR, Mital S, Burke MA et al (2021) 2020 AHA/ACC guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 162:e23–e106
Musumeci MB, Mastromarino V, Casenghi M et al (2017) Pulmonary hypertension and clinical correlates in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 248:326–332
Ong KC, Geske JB, Hebl VB et al (2016) Pulmonary hypertension is associated with worse survival in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:604–610
Geske JB, Konecny T, Ommen SR et al (2014) Surgical myectomy improves pulmonary hypertension in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 35:2032–2039
Finocchiaro G, Knowles JW, Pavlovic A et al (2014) Prevalence and Clinical Correlates of Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 113:361–367
Covella M, Rowin EJ, Hill NS et al (2017) Mechanism of Progressive Heart Failure and Significance of Pulmonary Hypertension in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail 10:e003689
Tolle JJ, Waxman AB, Van Horn TL et al (2008) Exercise-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 118:2183–2189
Naeije R, Saggar R, Badesch D et al (2018) Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension: Translating Pathophysiological Concepts Into Clinical Practice. Chest 154:10–15
Bossone E, Rubenfire M, Bach DS et al (1999) Range of tricuspid regurgitation velocity at rest and during exercise in normal adult men: implications for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1662–1666
Lewis GD, Bossone E, Naeije R et al (2013) Pulmonary vascular hemodynamic response to exercise in cardiopulmonary diseases. Circulation 128:1470–1479
Voilliot D, Magne J, Dulgheru R et al (2014) Determinants of exercise-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Int J Cardiol 173:373–379
Guazzi M, Naeije R (2017) Pulmonary Hypertension in Heart Failure: Pathophysiology, Pathobiology, and Emerging Clinical Perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:1718–1734
Hamatani Y, Amaki M, Yonezawa R et al (2019) Prevalence, determinants, and prognostic significance of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 35:837–844
Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP et al (2016) Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:1321–1360
Rigopoulos AG, Panou F, Sakadakis E et al (2020) Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Parameters at Three Months After Alcohol Septal Ablation in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy Are Associated With Late Clinical Outcome. Heart Lung Circ 29:202–210
Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L et al (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:685–713
Gilbert BW, Pollick C, Adelman AG et al (1980) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: subclassification by m mode echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 45:861–872
Maron MS, Olivotto I, Zenovich AG et al (2006) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is predominantly a disease of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Circulation 114:2232–2239
Ong KC, Geske JB, Hebl VB et al (2016) Pulmonary hypertension is associated with worse survival in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:604–610
Georgiopoulou VV, Kalogeropoulos AP, Borlaug BA et al (2013) Left ventricular dysfunction with pulmonary hypertension: Part 1: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and definitions. Circ Heart Fail 6:344–354
Re F, Zachara E, Avella A et al (2017) Dissecting functional impairment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by dynamic assessment of diastolic reserve and outflow obstruction: A combined cardiopulmonary-echocardiographic study. Int J Cardiol 227:743–750
Faria CC, Costa S, Hung HS et al (2020) Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure Response to Exercise in Patients with Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: Determinants and Prognostic Value. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 33:550–558
Taylor BJ, Shapiro BP, Johnson BD (2020) Exercise intolerance in heart failure: The important role of pulmonary hypertension. Exp Physiol 105:1997–2003
Magrì D, Santolamazza C (2017) Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Ann Am Thorac Soc 14:S102–S109
Rowin EJ, Maron BJ, Olivotto I et al (2017) Role of Exercise Testing in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:1374–1386
van Riel AC, Opotowsky AR, Santos M et al (2017) Accuracy of Echocardiography to Estimate Pulmonary Artery Pressures With Exercise: A Simultaneous Invasive-Noninvasive Comparison. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10:e005711

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
16 May, 2022
Reviews received at journal
14 May, 2022
Reviews received at journal
09 May, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
04 May, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
04 May, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
04 May, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
04 May, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
04 May, 2022
First submitted to journal
02 May, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A combined cardiopulmonary exercise test –echocardiographic study

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Study design and population studied

Exercise echocardiography and cardiopulmonary test

Study Endpoints and Patients follow-up

Statistical analysis

Results

General cardiopulmonary test and echocardiographic results

Prevalence and correlation of EiPAH with clinical and CPET/echocardiography parameters

Outcome

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1