2.1 Participants
A clinical sample of patients seeking hospitalization or visiting for an inpatient DH crisis was recruited for the study. The diagnosis of Restrictive Anorexia Nervosa was confirmed using the semi-structured interview, SCID-5-CV [38]. The constitution of the clinical group was made according to the following criteria: Inclusion: between 16 and 30 years of age, acute phase of AN, BMI ≥ 12.5 Kg / m2, Time from diagnosis ≥ 6 months; Exclusion: Chronic pathology (time from diagnosis ≥ 10 years), diagnosis of acute psychosis, mental retardation, cognitive impairment, ongoing alcohol or psychoactive substance abuse and/or other conditions that may affect the understanding of the questionnaires and the ability to provide informed consent. Simultaneously, a control group was recruited, which was similar to the clinical group in terms of age and educational attainment. The exclusion criteria for control group were the presence of DCA symptoms, which was evaluated using the Eating Attitudes Scale test (EAT-26) [39]. The sample numerosity has been estimated by G*Power 3.1.9.2 (Düsseldorf, Germany) for two group comparison on an effect size of f .25 (mean), power of 80%, assuming α .05.
Specifically, 29 female clinical participants and 36 non-clinical female participants have been included, with an average age and standard deviation of 19.8 years and 4.1 ds respectively for the first group, and 21 years and 2.4 ds for the second.
2.2 Procedure
Following the recruitment procedure, described above, participants completed the informed consent. Research involved the administration of standardized self-report tests through a special form and, subsequently, of an interview through online platforms, due to the global COVID-19 pandemic. The interview was carried out through an online meeting program and The Relational Anecdotical Protocol method of interviewing was used. This method of interviewing is similar to that of a psychotherapy session transcript analysis, which offers a broad scope of in the study of narratives [40-41]. The administration of the measures took place in similar settings for all groups- individually, with a qualified and experienced psychologist. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed following specific procedures for the Italian version of the Discourse Attributes Analysis Program (DAAP) [42] for the computerized application of the RP linguistic measures. The protocol has been approved by the Department Ethics Committee, where the study was developed.
2.3 Measures
The research consisted of different questionnaires, including the following:
-Socio-demographic questionnaire: a demographic sheet that contains questions regarding gender, age, level of education, marital status, family of origin, current occupation, and whether the individual is currently in psychotherapy and/or receiving pharmacological treatment;
- Profile of Mood of State -POMS [43-44] is a self-report psychological measure of mood states consisting
of a 65-item mood adjective checklist in which each adjective is scored from 0 (absent) to 4 (very much), based on how well each item describes the respondent's mood during a specified time frame (during the past week, including today). Following the standard scoring method for the Italian population, six mood scales are derived: tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor activity, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment. A higher score denotes a higher level of a certain emotion.
- Toronto Alexithymia Scale – TAS-20 [45] a questionnaire that evaluates the presence of clinical or non-clinical alexithymia, and therefore identifies the subjects most at risk of pathology. Three factors emerge from the factor analysis, which correspond closely to the construct: Difficulty in identifying feelings (DIS) and distinguishing between emotions and bodily sensations; and Difficulty in describing feelings (DDS);
- Emotion Regulation Questionnaire -ERQ [46-47]: a self-report questionnaire that includes 10 items and contains two scales corresponding to two different strategies of emotional regulation: cognitive restructuring and repression of the response;
- Linguistic measures of the Referential Process: (see Table 1)
Computerized language measures have been applied to the transcripts of the interviews of the referential process, according to the Multiple Code Theory to which we refer [25]. The following dimensions were used on the narratives and were later coded with support of the IDAAP software (Italian Discourse Attributes Analysis Program) [48], the Italian version of the DAAP [49]. IDAAP is a computerized software that compares any type of text with sets of words by assigning a specific weight, in order to indicate its frequency, compared with specific dictionaries. It allows for the measurement of the emotional intensity of the speech and how much the speaker is connected with the experience they are talking about. These measures are applied for each speaker and for each verbal shift.
The measures used are listed below:
- Italian Weighted Referential Activity Dictionary IWRAD [48] is a list of 9596 frequently used linguistic elements. In addition to ordinary words and contraction parts, the dictionary contains words with a high-frequency function, such as articles, pronouns, and prepositions that are aspects of the generative function of language, usually used without specific intent. IWRAD evaluates language style rather than content, represents unintended aspects of emotional expression, and provides microanalytic tracking of Symbolizing fluctuations within various forms of communicative speech. For a deeper discussion on the method of building a weighted dictionary like IWRAD, see [49].
- The Italian Mean High Weighted Referential Activity Dictionary (MH-IWRAD) is a variable that is calculated using IWRAD scores. It is defined as the Referential Activity Intensity Index, essentially a measure of high intensity of emotional engagement emerging from speech [48]. It indicates the amount by which the IWRAD exceeds the neutral value of 0.5. It is obtained by looking only at the words with IWRAD scores lying above the neutral value and then computing, for only those words, the average IWRAD scores. This is perhaps best understood as a measure of upward oscillations in RA scores.
- The Italian DisFluency Dictionary (IDFD) is a small set of words as well as repeated words, incomplete words, and filled pauses that people tend to use when struggling to communicate [50]. A score on this index corresponds to the proportion of IDFD words present in the speech. High scores typically characterize the arousal phase in which emotional schemas are activating.
- Italian Reflection Dictionary (IREF) [48], a dictionary that contains words about the way people think and communicate thoughts. It includes basic logical words and elements that refer to cognitive, logical, or impaired functions. These elements will probably dominate in the reorganization phase.
- The Italian Sensory Somatic Dictionary (ISensD) is a list of Italian words related to the body and bodily activities, and to sensory processes and/or descriptions of symptoms [29]. The number of ISensD words in a speech sample is a measure of the arousal of bodily, sub-symbolic aspects of emotion schemas.
- The Italian Sum Affect Dictionary (ISAffD) [48] contains Italian words concerning how people feel and communicate feelings directly. It includes emotion labels, functions associated with affective arousal, and words indicating an emotional response, either positive or negative. ISAffD consists of three sub-dictionaries related to domains of affect: positive affect (IPAffD), negative affect (INAffD), neutral affect without a specific valence (IZAffD)
- The Relationship Anecdotal Paradigm (RAP) [51] Interviewees are presented with the following prompt, “Please tell me some incidents or events about an interaction between yourself in relation to another person” (Luborsky, 1998, p. 110), specifying when it occurred, with whom it occurred, something about what the other person said or did, and what happened in the end. Interviewees are asked to tell between 6 to 10 relationship episodes and are free to describe any incidents about any person. Evidence for the validity of the RAP was provided by Barber, Luborsky, Crits-Christoph, & Diguer [52].
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 26 (SPSS version 25). Data is reported as means and standard deviations for continuous variables and as percentages for discrete variables. Student’s t- and Chi-square tests were performed in order to evaluate the homogeneity of the two groups respectively for continuous and discrete variables. The t-test for paired samples was applied to explore differences between two groups for all measures applied and a Cohen’s D effect size was performed. A logistic binary regression predicting clinical and non-clinical groups was performed, using specific linguistic variables as independent variables.