Hospital-acquired infections (HAI) are one of the serious problems of hospitals and medical centers and the most important causes of patients' dissatisfaction during the course of a treatment. HAI or nosocomial infections are defined as cases in which the patient had not been affected at the time of hospitalization or at its incubation period, and acquires it in hospital at least 48 h after admission (Rajakaruna et al. 2017; Marion-Sanchez et al. 2019). These infections, in addition to patients, affect all hospital staff and patients' companions and cause a longer duration of the patient hospitalization and the increase of diagnostic and therapeutic costs (Stone et al. 2005; Rajakaruna et al. 2017). The most common reported nosocomial infections are urinary and respiratory tract infections and cutaneous infections, including surgical and burn wounds. Usually, the clinical strains P. aeruginosa and E. coli cause such infections (Bennett 1974; Mayon-White et al. 1988; Wurtz et al. 1995; Baviskar et al. 2019).
P. aeruginosa acts as an opportunistic pathogen in people with immunodeficiency and burn injuries and is resistant to many chemical antibiotics (Al-Wrafy et al. 2017; Azam and Khan 2019). Some strains of E. coli can also produce gastrointestinal, urinary tract infections and even cause meningitis. This bacterium is the most important cause of urinary tract infections, especially in women (Bélanger et al. 2011; Smith and Fratamico 2017; Mellata et al. 2018). Many strains of this bacterium are resistant to penicillin and cephalosporins by producing beta-lactamase enzymes (Nikolić et al. 2018). Nowadays, one of the most important medical approaches is reducing the duration of the treatment. Since the infectious diseases that are caused by highly drug resistant P. aeruginosa and E. coli strains usually increase the duration of the treatment; in this research, we tried to provide a new alternative compound, derived from a medicinal plant, against the nosocomial infections caused by them.
According to the results of many studies, walnut leaves due to their content in compounds such as juglone and phenolics can be used as an easily available source of natural compounds to inhibit the growth of some bacterial strains. Pereira et al. (2007) reported that walnut leaf aqueous extracts inhibited only the growth of gram-positive bacteria such as Bacillus cereus, S. aureus and Bacillus subtilis but gram-negative bacteria including E. coli, P. aeruginosa and K. peumoniae were resistant to it (Pereira et al. 2007). Fadi Qa'dan et al. (2005) revealed the antimicrobial activity of walnut leaf extracts against Propionibacterium acnes, S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis (Qa'dan et al. 2005). In 2010, Coban and Bivik studied the antimicrobial activity of ethanol extracts of walnut leaves against E. coli, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, B. cereus, Micrococcus luteus, Salmonella typhimirium, S. pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, Bacillus thrungiensis, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas extorquens, Proteus sp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans, Candida glabata, Candida utilis and Candida trophicalis. Their results showed that the ethanol extracts of walnut leaves inhibited the growth of nine gram-positive bacteria and all the examined yeasts but did not show any antimicrobial effect against the three gram-negative bacteria tested (i.e., E. coli, S. pneumonia and S. marcescens) (Biyik 2010). In addition, Sharafati et al. (2011) showed that walnut leaves could be used to inhibit the growth of different gram-positive bacteria responsible for dental plaques and oral hygiene problems (Zakavi et al. 2013).
Despite the aforementioned studies, in 2014, Enitan et al. reported the antibacterial activity of the methanolic leaf extract of Plukenetia conophora Mull. arg. (African walnut) against gram-negative P. aeruginosa and E. coli isolated from urinary tract infections. Using the well diffusion method with 100 µL of extract, they found the highest zone of inhibition for an extract concentration of 200 mg/mL (18 mm for P. aeruginosa and 12 mm for E. coli). For extract concentrations of 150, 100, 50 and 25 mg/mL E. coli did not show any zone of inhibition, while P. aeruginosa did (14, 12, 10 and 8 mm, respectively). The results obtained for P. aeruginosa were similar to that of the present study, while those of E. coli were worst, despite they used 100 µL and we only 20 µL (Table 2) (Enitan et al. 2014). Also, in 2018, Ioana Nicu et al. observed an inhibition zone of 11 mm against P. aeruginosa and of less than 8 mm against E. coli for 200 µL of concentrated extract of walnut leaves. Thus, despite using higher extract concentrations, their results were worse than that of the present study (Table 2) (Nicu et al. 2018). Moreover, Mirza and et al (2019) showed that gram-negative bacteria were more resistant than the gram positive ones to zinc oxide nanoparticles derived from Juglen regia (walnut) leaves (Mirza et al. 2019).
Table 2
Comparison of agar diffusion test results on P. aeruginosa and E. coli in different studies.
[Extract] (mg/L)
|
Test sample
(µL)
|
Inhibition zone (∅mm)
|
Reference
|
P. aeruginosa
|
E. coli
|
5 total phenols (mg GAE/mL)
|
200
|
11
|
〈8
|
Ioana Nicu et al. 2018
|
25
|
100
|
8
|
0
|
Enitan and et al. 2014
|
30
|
20
|
8.6
|
9.2
|
Present study
|
50
|
100
|
10
|
0
|
Enitan et al. 2014
|
20
|
8.8
|
9.8
|
Present study
|
100
|
100
|
12
|
0
|
Enitan and et al. 2014
|
20
|
10.4
|
12.1
|
Present study
|
150
|
100
|
14
|
0
|
Enitan and et al. 2014
|
200
|
100
|
18
|
12
|
Enitan and et al. 2014
|
The antimicrobial activity obtained in present study for the walnut leave extract (Tuyserkan cultivar) suggests its use as an alternative source of treatment against microbial infections caused by P. aeruginosa and E, coli. In conclusion, it is very likely that the synergistic action of this extract and conventional antibiotics will be more effective against the multidrug resistant strains of P. aeruginosa and E. coli.