In the present study, most of the pediatric neurologists who participated (95%) thought that KDT could be sustained during the pandemic period and did not need to be terminated, while less than half (45%) stated that it would be more difficult to start using KDT during the pandemic. Not all centres offer KDT services, and clinicians and dietitians in those that do may be redeployed to assist with other services during the pandemic. There were also concerns regarding the potential risk of exposure to Covid-19 in a hospital setting where infected individuals are treated [2]. For these and similar reasons, pediatric neurologists may have concerns about the initiation of KDT and may even believe that it is not appropriate or practical to start this type of treatment during a pandemic [3]. In this study, few (39%) pediatric neurologists responded that starting KDT instead of a new ASD was the more appropriate option, and 43% believed that the risk of side effects with KDT was lower than with a new ASD.
Coronavirus disease (Covid-19), a new infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has significantly affected the lives of people around the world. It is therefore expected that in some ways maintaining a certain diet during the Covid-19 pandemic would be difficult. Pediatric neurologists and dietitians need to be aware of the challenge of maintaining KDT during the Covid-19 pandemic. Continuing KDT is not only an issue for patients during pandemic times: healthcare providers should help their patients overcome any problems associated with the pandemic by understanding their condition [5].
Post-pandemic, many centres have reported that KDT can be successfully delivered via telemedicine with a creatively initiated, individualized approach and advanced planning. In this vein there are several options available, and all are potentially viable. One option is to continue to admit children to the hospital for classic KDT and use focused education, do not use fasting, use a rapid titration in rate or calories over 24 hours, and provide for a shortened hospital stay through the provision of recorded lectures and/or written materials to enhance learning. The use of recorded or written educational materials could results in a short stay of only 1 or 2 days, for example. The physician can maintain close contact via phone, text, email and/or other electronic means of communication for inquiries and confirmation of the educational experience. A second method is to gradually begin the classic KDT outpatient by using telemedicine visits and training. This approach has been recommended to patients whose caregivers have access to a kitchen scale and other materials, can shop for the required dietary requirements prior to starting the treatment, and who can reliably participate in online training. Online training sessions can also be provided to small groups of 2 to 4 families at a time, provided that all participants agree. Third, MAD is theoretically an excellent option. This diet does not require foods to be weighed, has a reduced risk of hypoglycemia and hyperketosis, is already widely used as an outpatient treatment, is considered safe and effective without fasting, and has many materials and recipes that can be accessed online. The fourth option is to initiate MAD and, if necessary, switch to classical KD. Finally, as long as there is valid insurance coverage, patients with gastrostomy tubes can easily be started on KDT by replacing their normal formula with a ketogenic formula [18]. In the present study, most of the pediatric neurologists had considered using the MAD or Low glisemic index diet therapy (LGIT). 88% knew that MAD does not require weighing food, and the risk of hypoglycemia and hyperketosis is less than classical KDT. Most of them (98%) aware that patients with a gastrostomy tube, the formula could be easily converted to KD, paid for by the insurance and home care services could be used.
Numerous factors related to the continuation of dietary therapy, including finances, logistics, access to low-carb foods, and motivation to follow the diet all play a role in the ability to maintain the diet and all have been affected by the pandemic. With regard to dietary treatments, the cost of foods, supplements, and additional laboratory tests must be considered.
There has been an increase in people facing financial difficulties due to loss of job opportunities during the pandemic [19]. Financial support is recommended for patients who may benefit from dietary therapy. Society as a whole should be made aware of the fact that these types of dietary therapies can be lifesaving to some and that the positive health benefits can be jeopardized by the lack of resources brought on by the pandemic. Avenues of providing financial support to such patients should be sought.
One of the challenges when implementing dietary therapy during the Covid-19 pandemic is the need for laboratory testing [12]. Monitoring of physiological ketosis is useful for classic KDT and is accomplished by measuring daily ketone concentrations in urine or blood samples. Patients who continued this type of diet therapy during the pandemic were not only faced with financial problems, but also faced limited access to food. This occurs when people stock up on low-carb foods needed for diet therapy [20]. If the diet is not strictly adhered to, the general condition deteriorates, increasing the likelihood of seizures, which can lead to impaired immune function and various complications [21]. The increase in seizures and their consequences could potentially lead to increased exposure to Covid-19. Therefore, food intake suitable for the prescribed diet therapy is a critical issue for such patients. It is also important to maintain motivation for diet therapy. A previous article reported that patients or their caregivers may discontinue diet therapy for reasons such as increased levels of anxiety or stress caused by Covid-19 during the pandemic [19].
Most of the pediatric neurologists (73%) who agreed to participate in the study stated that there was no change in their preference for KDT in hospitalized patients (status epilepticus, infantile spasm, etc.) due to the pandemic. KDT in children is a therapeutic option for the acute phase of refractory/super-refractory status epilepticus [22]. The use of this dietary therapy is difficult due to the critical condition of the patients and its tolerability. Optimal management of children receiving this dietary therapy should be ensured from the beginning [23]. When administered properly, the ketogenic diet is tolerated [24], and may result in an increased number of patients achieving seizure-free status over time. Then, proper management of the ketogenic diet is also important in order to avoid the paradoxical phenomenon of worsening seizures [25], known as the rebound effect in some cases. Thus, the initiation and maintenance of dietary therapy is the result of the simultaneous efforts of pediatric neurologists, dietitians, families, and other caregivers.
Despite all this, no studies have been conducted to date on the efficacy and safety of KDT during the pandemic period, and such studies are still needed.
However, KDT follow-up care using telemedicine options also has potential disadvantages. Laboratory and other routine assessments may be more difficult to obtain. The accuracy of patient height and weight measurement is uncertain, and significant technological limitations remain. It is more difficult to conduct a comprehensive neurological examination via telemedicine in patients with fluctuating neurological symptoms, and physicians and health personnel cannot help if the patient has a seizure during the virtual appointment. To start KDT using telemedicine methods requires more work to be done before starting the therapy to ensure patients and caregivers are ready for the first day of the diet. In-depth, detailed information (i.e., to stop the KDT so that the KDT is not enough) can be less personal when done by video call. Ketogenic diet therapy with telemedicine, both in terms of initial start-up and maintenance, may not be suitable for young infants, those at elevated risk for complicated hypoglycemia or metabolic problems, families who do not have access to technology, and families who may not be able to access emergency medical care if necessary [12].
Overall, both initiating and maintaining KDT can continue successfully in a pandemic crisis. It is a very suitable non-pharmacological option for DRE in children and families should not be discouraged or prevented from accessing this type of therapy. In fact, due to advantages provided by telemedicine methods, it could be thought continuing this type of application post-pandemic. The overall opinion, after the results of this research have been considered, is that the development of an appropriate infrastructure (medicolegal) is necessary so that reference centres with experience in KDT can switch to telemedicine applications.