Prognostic impact of pretreatment T790M mutation on outcomes for patients with resected, EGFR-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1637006/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Prognostic impact of pretreatment T790M mutation on outcomes for patients with resected, EGFR-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1637006/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Many previous studies have demonstrated that minor-frequency pretreatment T790M mutation (preT790M) could be detected by ultrasensitive methods in a considerable number of treatment-naïve, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. However, the impact of preT790M in resected cases on prognosis remains unclear.

Methods: We previously reported that preT790M could be detected in 298 (79.9%) of 373 surgically resected, EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Therefore, we investigated the impact of preT790M on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in this cohort by multivariate analysis. All patients were enrolled from July 2012 to December 2013, with follow-up until November 30, 2017.

Results: The median follow-up time was 48.6 months. Using a cutoff value of the median preT790M allele frequency, the high-preT790M group (n=151) had significantly shorter RFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.25, P=0.045) and a tendency for a shorter OS (HR=1.87, 95% CI: 0.99–3.55, P=0.055) than the low-preT790M group (n=222). On multivariate analysis, higher preT790M was independently associated with shorter RFS (high vs low, HR=1.56, 95% CI: 1.03-2.36, P=0.035), irrespective of advanced stage, older age, and male sex, and was also associated with shorter OS (high vs low, HR=2.16, 95% CI: 1.11-4.20, P=0.024) irrespective of advanced stage, older age, EGFR mutation subtype, and history of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusions: Minor-frequency, especially high-abundance of, preT790M was an independent factor associated with a poor prognosis in patients with surgically resected, EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Non-small cell lung cancer

EGFR mutation

Pretreatment T790M

Resection

Recurrence-free survival

Over the past decade, the treatment paradigm for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved dramatically due to the detection of “druggable” gene alterations and the development of molecular-targeted therapies [1]. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, such as exon 19 deletions (19del) and Leu858Arg point mutations in exon 21 (L858R), are among the most common driver oncogenes in NSCLC. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the recommended first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR-activating mutations and improve survival significantly in those patients. However, most patients received EGFR-TKI therapies eventually develop resistance. The most common mechanism of acquired resistance to first-generation or second-generation EGFR-TKIs, such as gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib, is secondary EGFR T790M mutation, which is observed in 50–60% of acquired resistance cases [2, 3]. Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-TKI that selectively inhibits both EGFR-activating and T790M mutations. Based on the remarkable results of the AURA and FLAURA trials, osimertinib has been approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations as first-line treatment and EGFR T790M-positive patients who had disease progression after prior-line EGFR-TKI treatment [4, 5].

The origin of EGFR-TKI resistance due to T790M mutation is not yet well understood. One of the hypotheses was that a T790M clone as a minor de novo clone preexists in treatment-naïve tumors, and the pretreatment T790M (preT790M) clone is selected and enriched by exposure to EGFR-TKIs [6, 7]. Actually, earlier studies indicated the presence of minor-frequency T790M in pretreatment tumor samples in a small cohort, but detection rates varied from 2–79%, depending on the mutation detection methods and their sensitivities [7–13]. Therefore, we previously conducted a study aimed to accurately detect preT790M and clarify the prevalence of preT790M in a larger cohort that was an EGFR-mutant subset within the Japan Molecular Epidemiology (JME) study cohort, and we reported that preT790M was detected in 298 (79.9%) of 373 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients using the ultra-sensitive droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), the analytical sensitivity of which was approximately 0.001% [14].

In a recent report, the phase 3 randomized ADAURA trial, which investigated the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as adjuvant treatment compared with placebo after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected stage IB to IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC, showed significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) in the adjuvant osimertinib arm [15]. Based on the result, osimertinib as adjuvant therapy for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations has been approved in the United States, China, and the European Union. However, there remain issues with adjuvant EGFR-TKI therapy, such as unclearness of overall survival (OS) benefit, the optimal administration period, cost, and adverse events. Therefore, development of biomarkers that identify high-risk populations for postoperative recurrence are needed to avoid unnecessary treatment. In advanced stage settings, previous researches demonstrated that preT790M was related to poor efficacy or shorter progression-free survival with the early-generation EGFR-TKI treatment [8–10, 12, 13, 16–19]. Moreover, several studies showed that a higher mutant-allele frequency (MAF) of preT790M might have greater impact on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs than the presence of preT790M [12, 13, 17]. These data suggest the negative predictive value of preT790M abundance for the efficacy of early-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Therefore, preT790M could be a potential biomarker candidate to identify patients who may benefit from adjuvant osimertinib treatment. However, the clinical significance or prognostic implications of minor-frequency preT790M in patients with early-stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had undergone surgical resection have not yet been determined.

The JME study is a prospective, multicenter, molecular epidemiology study collecting samples from 876 surgically resected NSCLC cases and examining the somatic mutations to tackle associations between driver oncogenes and smoking and other environmental factors. Molecular profiling of that cohort as the primary endpoint of the JME study has been previously reported [20]. The secondary endpoints of the study were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS analyses (UMIN 000008177). Thus, the follow-up data and clinical outcomes were collected prospectively with the intent to investigate the impact of somatic mutations on RFS and OS for resected NSCLC. In this report, the follow-up data and clinical outcomes, focused on the EGFR mutant cohort of the JME study, are presented, and the impact of preT790M in patients with surgically resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC on RFS and OS is elucidated.

Patients

Eligible subjects from the JME study were pathologically diagnosed NSCLC patients with clinical stage I to IIIB disease (TNM classification version 7) who had undergone surgery for therapeutic purposes. Full details of the study design have been published previously [20]. All patients were enrolled from July 2012 to December 2013. Somatic mutations were analyzed by multiplex-targeted deep sequencing, and mutations in EGFR were also confirmed by PCR methods by an independent clinical laboratory (SRL, Tokyo, Japan). As a result, 373 samples with an EGFR-activating mutation based on the Cycleave PCR method were analyzed by ddPCR in the current JME substudy. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Hospital Organization of Japan. All patients provided written, informed consent before surgery. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Detection of EGFR T790M mutation by droplet digital PCR

The ddPCR was carried out with a RainDrop Digital PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and the details of this procedure have been published previously [14]. Briefly, the duplex assay is based on the concurrent amplification of wildtype and specific mutant sequences in picoliter-sized compartmentalized liquid droplets and measurement of the terminal fluorescence signal from each droplet by flow cytometric techniques.

Statistical analysis

Clinical data, including age, sex, smoking history, pathological stage, history of adjuvant chemotherapy, EGFR mutation subtype, and study findings including preT790M were used for the analysis of the current JME substudy. Fisher’s exact test was carried out for comparison of categorical data. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the survival curves for RFS and OS. Log-rank tests were used to compare the survival curves among the patients by preT790M status. RFS was defined as the period from the date of operation to the date of confirmed recurrence from any cause. Patients that were alive on the date of the last follow-up were censored at the time. All P-values were according to a two-sided hypothesis, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the impact of preT790M on RFS and OS. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software (version 25).

Patient characteristics

In the current JME substudy, 373 EGFR-mutated NSCLC samples were obtained, and all samples could be analyzed for preT790M by ultra-sensitive ddPCR. As reported previously, preT790M was detected in 298 (79.9%) of 373 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients using ddPCR, of which the analytical sensitivity was approximately 0.001%. The preT790M-MAF ranged from 0.009–26.9% (median MAF 0.044%), and most tumors had preT790M-MAF < 0.1% [14].

All 373 patients' clinical and prognostic data were collected prospectively. The data cutoff date for the JME study was November 30, 2017, and the median follow-up time in this study was 48.6 months. The characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. In the current analysis, the median age was 69 years (range 30–92 years), 182 patients (48.8%) were 70 years old or older, 276 (74.0%) were female, 361 (96.8%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, and 93 (24.9%) had a smoking history. The number of patients by pathological stage was 219 patients (56.7%) in stage IA, 71 (19.0%) in stage IB, 43 (11.5%) in stage II, and 40 (10.7%) in stage III-IV. A total of 120 patients (32.2%) received the adjuvant chemotherapy, and of these, 2 patients with stage II and 5 patients with stage III-IV received gefitinib as adjuvant chemotherapy. Regarding EGFR mutation status, 155 patients (41.6%) had 19del, 199 (53.4%) had L858R, and 19 (5.1%) had uncommon mutations.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients according to pretreatment T790M status
Characteristics	Number of patients, n (%)						P
	All (n = 373)		Pretreatment T790M
	All (n = 373)		High (n = 151, 40.5%)		Low (n = 222, 59.5%)
Age Median (range) <70 ≥70	69 191 182	(30–92) (51.2) (48.8)	69 75 76	(37–88) (49.7) (50.3)	69 116 106	(30–92) (52.3) (47.7)	0.67
Gender Male Female	97 276	(26.0) (74.0)	36 115	(23.8) (76.2)	61 161	(27.5) (72.5)	0.47
Smoking Never smoker Smoker	280 93	(75.1) (24.9)	125 26	(82.8) (17.2)	155 67	(69.8) (30.2)	0.0050
Histology Adenocarcinoma Other	361 12	(96.8) (3.2)	144 7	(95.4) (4.6)	217 5	(97.7) (2.3)	0.24
Pathological Stage (7th) IA IB-II III-IV	219 114 40	(58.7) (30.6) (10.7)	84 52 15	(55.6) (34.4) (9.9)	135 62 25	(60.8) (27.9) (11.3)	0.42
EGFR Mt Status Exon21 L858R Exon19 deletion Uncommon	199 155 19	(53.4) (41.6) (5.1)	82 62 7	(54.3) (41.1) (4.6)	117 93 12	(52.7) (41.9) (5.4)	0.92
Adjuvant Chemotherapy No Yes UFT Platinum doublet EGFR-TKI Other	253 120 73 34 7 6	(67.8) (32.2)	98 53 32 18 1 2	(64.9) (35.1)	155 67 41 16 6 4	(69.8) (30.2)	0.37
TP53 Mt Status Wild-type Mutant	304 69	(81.5) (18.5)	130 21	(86.1) (13.9)	174 48	(78.4) (21.6)	0.077
Co-existing except TP53 Mt No Yes	329 44	(88.2) (11.8)	131 20	(86.8) (13.2)	198 24	(89.2) (10.8)	0.52
EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; Mt, mutation; UFT, tegafur-uracil; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; TP53, tumor protein P53.

When tumor samples were classified as having low or high levels of preT790M, using MAF of 0.045% as the cutoff based on the median MAF of 0.044%, that is, low-preT790M was defined as consisting of preT790M-MAF < 0.045% plus preT790M-negative, and high-preT790M was defined as preT790M-MAF ≥ 0.045%, the low group had 222 patients (59.5%), and the high group had 151 patients (40.5%). According to preT790M status, there were no significant differences in preT790M status by age, sex, tumor stage, EGFR mutation status, or history of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, there were significantly more never smokers among patients with high-preT790M than among those with low-preT790M (Table 1).

Impact Of Pretreatment T790m On Rfs

First, RFS was analyzed according to preT790M status. RFS tended to be shorter in patients with preT790M than in those without preT790M (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98–3.15, P = 0.056) (Supplementary Fig. S1A), whereas RFS was significantly shorter in patients with high-preT790M than in those with low-preT790M (HR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.01–2.25, P = 0.045) (Fig. 1A). On univariate analysis, age (≥ 70 years), pathological stage (III-IV > IB-II > IA), and adjuvant chemotherapy (yes) were factors related to shorter RFS. On the other hand, sex, smoking history, and EGFR mutation status did not affect RFS (Table 2). During this observational period, 96 RFS events were occurred.

Table 2

Prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS): univariate and multivariate analyses
Factor	univariate			multivariate
Factor	HR	(95% CI)	P	HR	(95% CI)	P
Pretreatment T790M (ref = Low) High	1.51	(1.01–2.25)	.045	1.56	(1.03–2.36)	.035
Age (ref = < 70) ≥70	1.85	(1.23–2.79)	< .01	1.55	(0.99–2.43)	.056
Gender (ref = Female) Male	1.16	(0.75–1.81)	.50	1.93	(1.06–3.52)	.032
Smoking (ref = Never smoker) Smoker	1.16	(0.75–1.82)	.50	0.87	(0.48–1.59)	.66
EGFR Mt (ref = Exon21 L858R) Exon19 deletion Uncommon	1.03 1.03	(0.68–1.55) (0.41–2.58)	.90 .95	1.02 0.53	(0.66–1.57) (0.20–1.40)	.93 .20
Pathological Stage (7th) (ref = IA) IB-II III-IV	6.05 19.43	(3.51–10.42) (10.80-34.96)	< .00001 < .00001	6.30 25.46	(3.46–11.47) (13.11–49.44)	< .00001 < .00001
Adjuvant Chemotherapy (ref = No) Yes	2.19	(1.47–3.27)	< .001	0.87	(0.55–1.38)	.56

Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher preT790M-MAF (high vs low, HR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.03–2.36, P = 0.035), male sex (male vs female, HR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.06–3.52, P = 0.032), and advanced pathological stage (IB-II vs IA, HR = 6.30, 95% CI: 3.46–11.47, P < 0.00001; III-IV vs IA, HR = 25.46, 95% CI: 13.11–49.44, P < 0.00001) were significantly associated with shorter RFS (Table 2). Older age tended to be related to shorter RFS (≥ 70 vs < 70 years, HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.99–2.43, P = 0.056). According to pathological stage, RFS was shorter in patients with high-preT790M than in those with low-preT790M in stage IB-IV, but there was no significant difference in RFS regardless of preT790M status in stage IA (Fig. 2A-B and Supplementary Fig. S2).

Impact Of Pretreatment T790m On Os

Second, OS was analyzed according to preT790M status. There was no significant difference in OS between patients with and without preT790M (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 0.53–3.27, P = 0.55) (Supplementary Fig. S1B), but OS tended to be shorter in patients with high-preT790M than in those with low-preT790M (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 0.99–3.55, P = 0.055) (Fig. 1B). On univariate analysis, age (≥ 70 years), uncommon EGFR mutation, and pathological stage (III-IV > IB-II > IA) were factors related to shorter OS. On the other hand, sex, smoking history, and adjuvant chemotherapy did not affect OS (Table 3). During this observational period, 38 OS events were occurred.

Table 3

Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS): univariate and multivariate analyses
Factor	univariate			multivariate
Factor	HR	(95% CI)	P	HR	(95% CI)	P
Pretreatment T790M (ref = Low) High	1.87	(0.99–3.55)	.055	2.16	(1.11–4.20)	.024
Age (ref = < 70) ≥70	2.13	(1.09–4.17)	.028	1.79	(0.87–3.69)	.12
Gender (ref = Female) Male	1.12	(0.56–2.26)	.75	1.17	(0.40–3.44)	.77
Smoking (ref = Never smoker) Smoker	1.34	(0.68–2.66)	.40	1.25	(0.43–3.61)	.69
EGFR Mt (ref = Exon21 L858R) Exon19 deletion Uncommon	1.56 3.54	(0.79–3.10) (1.28–9.77)	.20 .015	1.80 3.33	(0.88–3.67) (1.13–9.83)	.11 .029
Pathological Stage (7th) (ref = IA) IB-II III-IV	3.51 9.68	(1.55–7.95) (4.14–22.67)	< .01 < .00001	4.30 12.10	(1.77–10.40) (4.83–30.29)	.001 < .00001
Adjuvant Chemotherapy (ref = No) Yes	1.07	(0.55–2.09)	.85	0.47	(0.22–1.01)	.053

Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher preT790M-MAF (high vs low, HR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.11–4.20, P = 0.024), uncommon EGFR mutation (vs L858R, HR = 3.33, 95% CI: 1.13–9.83, P = 0.029), and advanced pathological stage (IB-II vs IA, HR = 4.30, 95% CI: 1.77–10.40, P = 0.001; III-IV vs IA, HR = 12.10, 95% CI: 4.83–30.29, P < 0.00001) were significantly associated with shorter OS (Table 3). Older age (≥ 70 vs < 70 years, HR = 1.79, 95% CI: 0.87–3.69, P = 0.12) and 19del (vs L858R, HR = 1.80, 95% CI: 0.88–3.67, P = 0.11) tended to have shorter OS, and adjuvant chemotherapy tended to be related to longer OS (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.22–1.01, P = 0.053). According to pathological stage, OS was shorter in patients with high-preT790M than in those with low-preT790M in stage IB-IV, but there was no significant difference in OS regardless of preT790M status in stage IA (Fig. 2C-D and Supplementary Fig. S3).

During this observational period, 92 postoperative recurrence events were recorded. According to the preT790M status, 44 (29.1%) and 48 (21.6%) recurrences were observed in the high- and low-preT790M groups, respectively. Post-recurrence treatments are shown in Table 4.

Table 4

Postoperative recurrence events and post-recurrence treatment
	Number of patients, n (%)						P
	All (n = 373)		Pretreatment T790M
	All (n = 373)		High (n = 151)		Low (n = 222)
Recurrence events Locoregional Distant	92 45 58	(24.7) (12.1) (15.5)	44 21 28	(29.1) (13.9) (18.5)	48 24 30	(21.6) (10.8) (13.5)	0.11 0.42 0.19
Post-recurrence treatment Local therapy Radiation therapy Surgery Systemic therapy Chemotherapy EGFR-TKI Best Supportive Care	24 4 9 53 5		13 1 5 25 1		11 3 4 28 4

Before the current study, many studies reported the predictive impact of minor-frequency preT790M on the efficacy of initial EGFR-TKI treatment or on the prognosis, mainly in advanced stage settings. However, there were few reports regarding the clinical significance of preT790M in patients with resected NSCLC. In this prospective exploratory analysis, minor-frequency preT790M in the resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC samples was shown to potentially affect RFS and OS.

In previous analyses of prognostic factors for resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC, older age, male sex, advanced stage, and smoker were shown to be independent factors associated with a poor prognosis (RFS or OS) in many studies, although the covariates evaluated differed depending on the studies [21–31]. In the current study, multivariate analysis, which considered these previous reports, demonstrated that male sex and advanced pathological stage were correlated with shorter RFS, and older age tended to be associated with shorter RFS. Pathological stage was also correlated with shorter OS, and in fact, pathological stage was the most important factor affecting RFS and OS. There were many reports showing that EGFR 19del was associated with worse RFS or OS than L858R [23, 25, 30], but some studies reported that 19del had better RFS or OS than L858R [27, 32], and others reported that EGFR mutation subtype has no prognostic impact [22]. Therefore, whether the EGFR mutation subtype has an impact on prognosis remained controversial. On multivariate analysis in the current study, there was no significant difference in RFS by EGFR mutation subtype, but 19del tended to have worse OS, and uncommon mutations had significantly worse OS than L858R.

Let us consider the impact of preT790M as a prognostic factor for survival. In the current study using ultra-sensitive ddPCR, the overall detection rate of preT790M was 79.9%, and the T790M-MAF ranged from 0.009–26.9% (median MAF 0.044%). Several previous studies indicated that higher MAF of preT790M might have a greater impact on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs than the presence of preT790M [12, 13, 17]. Therefore, when tumor samples were classified into two groups based on the abundance of T790M-MAF, multivariate analysis demonstrated that high-preT790M was the independent factor related to a poor prognosis (RFS), irrespective of patient background, including pathological stage, age, and sex. A previous retrospective study by Tatematsu et al, which analyzed the incidence of minor-frequency preT790M using competitive allele-specific PCR in 153 surgically resected EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma tissues, the incidence of preT790M was 29.4%, and T790M-MAF ranged from 0.13–2.65% (median MAF 0.20%) [33]. However, in their study, no significant impact of preT790M on RFS was shown. A previous analysis demonstrated that the impact of T790M shifts according to the cutoff level of T790M-MAF [13]. Therefore, differences in analytical sensitivity, the detection rate of preT790M, sample size, and population grouping might result in the differences in the impact of preT790M between their study and the present one. Furthermore, disease stage was the most crucial factor affecting prognosis [21–26, 28–31]. Therefore, it might be important to consider pathological stage in the analysis of clinical significance of minor-frequency preT790M, although the association of preT790M status with patient characteristics was not reported in their study. In fact, the present study showed that higher-preT790M affected RFS in stage IB or more advanced disease, but it seemed unlikely in stage IA. On the other hand, Gao et al analyzed clinical outcomes of coexisting T790M in a surgically resected, EGFR-mutated NSCLC cohort using the Amplification Refractory Mutation System, of which the analytical sensitivity was known to be generally 1% [34]. Their study also demonstrated that RFS of patients with coexisting EGFR T790M was significantly shorter than of those without T790M mutations, and according to the stage, this tendency was observed not only in stage IB-IIIA, but also in stage IA. Greater T790M-MAF, which could be detected by routine clinical genotyping tests, might affect RFS even in stage IA, although ultra-low-level preT790M was thought not to have an impact on RFS in stage IA.

The above-mentioned study by Tatematsu et al also did not show a significant effect of preT790M on OS in surgically resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC [33]. However, in the current study, multivariate analysis demonstrated that preT790M was the independent factor related to a poor prognosis in patients with resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC, irrespective of patient background including pathological stage, age, EGFR mutation subtype, and history of adjuvant chemotherapy. According to pathological stage, high-preT790M showed no prognostic impact in stage IA, but OS in high-preT790M tended to be shorter in stage IB or more advanced settings, as well as in the RFS analysis. To the best of our knowledge, the present research is the first to show that preT790M has a significant impact on OS in resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC in a larger cohort.

In metastatic stage settings, the appearance of T790M mutation after resistance to initial EGFR-TKI treatment (acquired T790M) has been reported to be associated with a good prognosis in the patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC [35, 36]. On the other hand, positivity or high-abundance of preT790M has been demonstrated to be associated with poor efficacy of initial EGFR-TKI treatment or a poor prognosis [8–10, 12, 13, 16–19]. In the same way, the present study demonstrated that high-abundance of preT790M was correlated with poor RFS and OS in patients with early-stage NSCLC who had undergone surgical resection. These results suggest that clinical features are likely to be different between preT790M and acquired T790M [19]. A basic research study found that the acquisition of T790M was associated with a slowdown in tumor growth, which might underlie the good prognosis of EGFR-mutated NSCLC with acquired T790M [37]. However, the reason why patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC harboring preT790M appear to have a poor prognosis has not yet been elucidated, even though the tumor harbors a low-level amount of T790M clones and has undergone surgical resection. This is a subject for future investigation.

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with completely resected stage II-IIIA and a subset of stage I NSCLC according to the results from large, randomized trials and meta-analyses that have demonstrated a significant OS benefit [38, 39]. However, whether driver mutation-positive patients with resected stage NSCLC also benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy had not been accurately clarified. In particular, for patients with resected NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, given the role of EGFR-TKIs in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC, many clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in the adjuvant setting [40–45]. Most trials demonstrated that adjuvant treatment using first-generation EGFR-TKIs can decrease the risk of recurrence and prolong DFS compared to placebo or chemotherapy, but these DFS advantages did not always translate to OS [46, 47]. A meta-analysis that evaluated the role of EGFR-TKIs as an adjuvant therapy for patients with completely resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC demonstrated that, compared to mono chemotherapy, early-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy had a superior DFS benefit, but did not show a significant OS benefit, whereas treatment with EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer DFS and OS compared to mono chemotherapy [48]. Therefore, these data suggested that it was necessary for the prolongation of DFS and OS in patients with resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC not only to add EGFR-TKIs as adjuvant treatment, but also to perform standard adjuvant chemotherapy as much as possible. On multivariate analysis in the current study, it was observed that OS in the patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy tended to be better than in those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

The ADAURA trial demonstrated significant improvement of DFS in the adjuvant osimertinib arm (HR for disease recurrence or death, 0.17 [99% CI, 0.11–0.26] in patients with stage II to IIIA disease, and 0.20 [99% CI, 0.14–0.30] in patients with stage IB to IIIA disease) [15]. In that trial, administration of standard postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed, but not mandatory, although the DFS benefit from osimertinib was documented regardless of whether patients undergone adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on the present study findings, high-preT790M was an independent factor related to a poor prognosis for both RFS and OS in stage IB or more advanced stages. Though the basic correlation between poor prognosis and minor-frequency preT790M in resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC has not yet been elucidated, because osimertinib is expected to be effective for T790M, the efficacy of osimertinib for the population harboring potential preT790M might have resulted in the marked improvement of DFS in the ADAURA trial. Therefore, the addition of adjuvant osimertinib to standard adjuvant chemotherapy might also be expected to have a greater impact on improving OS. The NeoADAURA (NCT04351555) trial, investigating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutated resectable NSCLC, is ongoing. If translational research assessing minor-frequency T790M before osimertinib and after surgery could be conducted, the clinical significance of treatment of preT790M might be elucidated.

The limitations of the current study include the relatively short observation period and the low number of recurrence and death events, which results in a lack of statistical power, although the current study was the largest prospective trial, and the prognostic information was collected exactly. The number of patients in Stage I, especially stage IA, who have good prognosis because of the progress of diagnostic techniques and developments in improved surgical techniques was considerably large, which resulted in decreased incidences of recurrence and death. Therefore, further validation in a larger cohort might be needed for analysis of the prognosis for stage IB or more advanced settings.

The current prospective, multicenter, observational study showed that a higher mutant-allele frequency of pretreatment T790M in patients with surgically resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC was associated with poorer RFS, independent of male sex, advanced pathological stage, and older age, and was also associated with worse OS, independent of EGFR mutation genotype, advanced pathological stage, older age, and no adjuvant chemotherapy.

NSCLC

non-small cell lung cancer

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

19del

exon 19 deletions

L858R

Leu858Arg point mutations in exon 21

TKI

tyrosine kinase inhibitor

preT790M

pretreatment T790M

ddPCR

droplet digital polymerase chain reaction

DFS

disease-free survival

MAF

mutant-allele frequency

RFS

recurrence-free survival

overall survival

hazard ratio

confidence interval

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Hospital Organization of Japan (UMIN 000008177). All patients provided written, informed consent before surgery. All methods in this study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

All authors declare no potential conflicts of interest related to the submitted work.

Funding and Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the participants and their advisors who were involved in this study. This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Japanese National Hospital Organization Multi-Center Clinical Research for Evidence-Based Medicine (H23-EBM-01), Japan.

Author’s contributions

TK, MW, and YK provided the concept, TK acquired fund, and TK, SI, MA, AT, AK, CK, NY, and YK acquired study participants, samples or data. MW and YK designed and performed the experiments. YM analyzed the data. YM drafted the manuscript, and YK proofread and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Yoshiya Matsumoto: [email protected]

Tomoya Kawaguchi: [email protected]

Masaru Watanabe: [email protected]

Shun-ichi Isa: [email protected]

Masahiko Ando: [email protected]

Akihiro Tamiya: [email protected]

Akihito Kubo: [email protected]

Chiyoe Kitagawa: [email protected]

Naoki Yoshimoto: [email protected]

Yasuhiro Koh: [email protected]

Howlader N, Forjaz G, Mooradian MJ, Meza R, Kong CY, Cronin KA, Mariotto AB, Lowy DR, Feuer EJ: The Effect of Advances in Lung-Cancer Treatment on Population Mortality. N Engl J Med 2020, 383(7):640–649.
Yu HA, Arcila ME, Rekhtman N, Sima CS, Zakowski MF, Pao W, Kris MG, Miller VA, Ladanyi M, Riely GJ: Analysis of tumor specimens at the time of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy in 155 patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2013, 19(8):2240–2247.
Campo M, Gerber D, Gainor JF, Heist RS, Temel JS, Shaw AT, Fidias P, Muzikansky A, Engelman JA, Sequist LV: Acquired Resistance to First-Line Afatinib and the Challenges of Prearranged Progression Biopsies. J Thorac Oncol 2016, 11(11):2022–2026.
Mok TS, Wu YL, Ahn MJ, Garassino MC, Kim HR, Ramalingam SS, Shepherd FA, He Y, Akamatsu H, Theelen WS et al: Osimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2017, 376(7):629–640.
Soria JC, Ohe Y, Vansteenkiste J, Reungwetwattana T, Chewaskulyong B, Lee KH, Dechaphunkul A, Imamura F, Nogami N, Kurata T et al: Osimertinib in Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2018, 378(2):113–125.
Godin-Heymann N, Bryant I, Rivera MN, Ulkus L, Bell DW, Riese DJ, 2nd, Settleman J, Haber DA: Oncogenic activity of epidermal growth factor receptor kinase mutant alleles is enhanced by the T790M drug resistance mutation. Cancer Res 2007, 67(15):7319–7326.
Inukai M, Toyooka S, Ito S, Asano H, Ichihara S, Soh J, Suehisa H, Ouchida M, Aoe K, Aoe M et al: Presence of epidermal growth factor receptor gene T790M mutation as a minor clone in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 2006, 66(16):7854–7858.
Maheswaran S, Sequist LV, Nagrath S, Ulkus L, Brannigan B, Collura CV, Inserra E, Diederichs S, Iafrate AJ, Bell DW et al: Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. N Engl J Med 2008, 359(4):366–377.
Rosell R, Molina MA, Costa C, Simonetti S, Gimenez-Capitan A, Bertran-Alamillo J, Mayo C, Moran T, Mendez P, Cardenal F et al: Pretreatment EGFR T790M mutation and BRCA1 mRNA expression in erlotinib-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations. Clin Cancer Res 2011, 17(5):1160–1168.
Su KY, Chen HY, Li KC, Kuo ML, Yang JC, Chan WK, Ho BC, Chang GC, Shih JY, Yu SL et al: Pretreatment epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation predicts shorter EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor response duration in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012, 30(4):433–440.
Fujita Y, Suda K, Kimura H, Matsumoto K, Arao T, Nagai T, Saijo N, Yatabe Y, Mitsudomi T, Nishio K: Highly sensitive detection of EGFR T790M mutation using colony hybridization predicts favorable prognosis of patients with lung cancer harboring activating EGFR mutation. J Thorac Oncol 2012, 7(11):1640–1644.
Costa C, Molina MA, Drozdowskyj A, Gimenez-Capitan A, Bertran-Alamillo J, Karachaliou N, Gervais R, Massuti B, Wei J, Moran T et al: The impact of EGFR T790M mutations and BIM mRNA expression on outcome in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with erlotinib or chemotherapy in the randomized phase III EURTAC trial. Clin Cancer Res 2014, 20(7):2001–2010.
Lee Y, Lee GK, Lee YS, Zhang W, Hwang JA, Nam BH, Kim SH, Kim JH, Yun T, Han JY et al: Clinical outcome according to the level of preexisting epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation in patients with lung cancer harboring sensitive epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Cancer 2014, 120(14):2090–2098.
Watanabe M, Kawaguchi T, Isa S, Ando M, Tamiya A, Kubo A, Saka H, Takeo S, Adachi H, Tagawa T et al: Ultra-Sensitive Detection of the Pretreatment EGFR T790M Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with an EGFR-Activating Mutation Using Droplet Digital PCR. Clin Cancer Res 2015, 21(15):3552–3560.
Wu YL, Tsuboi M, He J, John T, Grohe C, Majem M, Goldman JW, Laktionov K, Kim SW, Kato T et al: Osimertinib in Resected EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2020, 383(18):1711–1723.
Dong Y, Zhou Z, Wang J, Ma L, Liu Z, Wang Y, Song J, Zhang S, Che N: Origin of the T790M mutation and its impact on the clinical outcomes of patients with lung adenocarcinoma receiving EGFR-TKIs. Pathol Res Pract 2019, 215(5):946–951.
Matsumoto Y, Sawa K, Fukui M, Oyanagi J, Yoshimoto N, Suzumura T, Watanabe T, Kaneda H, Mitsuoka S, Asai K et al: Predictive impact of low-frequency pretreatment T790M mutation in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Lung Cancer 2020, 139:80–88.
Ding D, Yu Y, Li Z, Niu X, Lu S: The predictive role of pretreatment epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation on the progression-free survival of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther 2014, 7:387–393.
Liu Y, Sun L, Xiong ZC, Sun X, Zhang SL, Ma JT, Han CB: Meta-analysis of the impact of de novo and acquired EGFR T790M mutations on the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving EGFR-TKIs. Onco Targets Ther 2017, 10:2267–2279.
Kawaguchi T, Koh Y, Ando M, Ito N, Takeo S, Adachi H, Tagawa T, Kakegawa S, Yamashita M, Kataoka K et al: Prospective Analysis of Oncogenic Driver Mutations and Environmental Factors: Japan Molecular Epidemiology for Lung Cancer Study. J Clin Oncol 2016, 34(19):2247–2257.
Kim YT, Seong YW, Jung YJ, Jeon YK, Park IK, Kang CH, Kim JH: The presence of mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor gene is not a prognostic factor for long-term outcome after surgical resection of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2013, 8(2):171–178.
Takamochi K, Oh S, Matsunaga T, Suzuki K: Prognostic impacts of EGFR mutation status and subtype in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017, 154(5):1768–1774 e1761.
Hayasaka K, Shiono S, Matsumura Y, Yanagawa N, Suzuki H, Abe J, Sagawa M, Sakurada A, Katahira M, Takahashi S et al: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation as a Risk Factor for Recurrence in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2018, 105(6):1648–1654.
Kim H, Lee HJ, Hong H, Kim YJ, Kim KG, Jeon YK, Kim YT: The prognostic implications of EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement for the long-term outcomes of patients with resected lung adenocarcinomas. Thorac Cancer 2019, 10(7):1619–1627.
Suda K, Mitsudomi T, Shintani Y, Okami J, Ito H, Ohtsuka T, Toyooka S, Mori T, Watanabe SI, Asamura H et al: Clinical Impacts of EGFR Mutation Status: Analysis of 5780 Surgically Resected Lung Cancer Cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2021, 111(1):269–276.
Lee YJ, Park IK, Park MS, Choi HJ, Cho BC, Chung KY, Kim SK, Chang J, Moon JW, Kim H et al: Activating mutations within the EGFR kinase domain: a molecular predictor of disease-free survival in resected pulmonary adenocarcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2009, 135(12):1647–1654.
Isaka T, Nakayama H, Yokose T, Ito H, Miyagi Y, Matsuzaki T, Nagata M, Furumoto H, Nishii T, Katayama K et al: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations and Prognosis in Pathologic N1-N2 Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2016, 102(6):1821–1828.
Nose N, Sugio K, Oyama T, Nozoe T, Uramoto H, Iwata T, Onitsuka T, Yasumoto K: Association between estrogen receptor-beta expression and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in the postoperative prognosis of adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27(3):411–417.
Koh Y, Jang B, Han SW, Kim TM, Oh DY, Lee SH, Kang CH, Kim DW, Im SA, Chung DH et al: Expression of class III beta-tubulin correlates with unfavorable survival outcome in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2010, 5(3):320–325.
Okamoto T, Kitahara H, Shimamatsu S, Katsura M, Takada K, Fujishita T, Suzuki Y, Morodomi Y, Tagawa T, Maehara Y: Prognostic Impact of EGFR Driver Mutations on Postoperative Disease Recurrence in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Anticancer Res 2016, 36(6):3057–3063.
Zhi Q, Wang Y, Wang X, Yue D, Li K, Jiang R: Predictive and prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers in resectable adenosqamous lung carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7(40):64798–64809.
Liu WS, Zhao LJ, Pang QS, Yuan ZY, Li B, Wang P: Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in resected lung adenocarcinomas. Med Oncol 2014, 31(1):771.
Tatematsu T, Okuda K, Suzuki A, Oda R, Sakane T, Kawano O, Haneda H, Moriyama S, Sasaki H, Nakanishi R: The detectability of the pretreatment EGFR T790M mutations in lung adenocarcinoma using CAST-PCR and digital PCR. J Thorac Dis 2017, 9(8):2397–2403.
Gao X, Zhao Y, Bao Y, Yin W, Liu L, Liu R, Yu Z, Zhou X, Shuai J: Poor Prognosis With Coexistence Of EGFR T790M Mutation And Common EGFR-Activating Mutation In Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2019, 11:9621–9630.
Oxnard GR, Arcila ME, Sima CS, Riely GJ, Chmielecki J, Kris MG, Pao W, Ladanyi M, Miller VA: Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutant lung cancer: distinct natural history of patients with tumors harboring the T790M mutation. Clin Cancer Res 2011, 17(6):1616–1622.
Matsuo N, Azuma K, Sakai K, Hattori S, Kawahara A, Ishii H, Tokito T, Kinoshita T, Yamada K, Nishio K et al: Association of EGFR Exon 19 Deletion and EGFR-TKI Treatment Duration with Frequency of T790M Mutation in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer Patients. Sci Rep 2016, 6:36458.
Chmielecki J, Foo J, Oxnard GR, Hutchinson K, Ohashi K, Somwar R, Wang L, Amato KR, Arcila M, Sos ML et al: Optimization of dosing for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with evolutionary cancer modeling. Sci Transl Med 2011, 3(90):90ra59.
Pignon JP, Tribodet H, Scagliotti GV, Douillard JY, Shepherd FA, Stephens RJ, Dunant A, Torri V, Rosell R, Seymour L et al: Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26(21):3552–3559.
Hamada C, Tanaka F, Ohta M, Fujimura S, Kodama K, Imaizumi M, Wada H: Meta-analysis of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur-uracil in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23(22):4999–5006.
Goss GD, O'Callaghan C, Lorimer I, Tsao MS, Masters GA, Jett J, Edelman MJ, Lilenbaum R, Choy H, Khuri F et al: Gefitinib versus placebo in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the NCIC CTG BR19 study. J Clin Oncol 2013, 31(27):3320–3326.
Kelly K, Altorki NK, Eberhardt WE, O'Brien ME, Spigel DR, Crino L, Tsai CM, Kim JH, Cho EK, Hoffman PC et al: Adjuvant Erlotinib Versus Placebo in Patients With Stage IB-IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (RADIANT): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol 2015, 33(34):4007–4014.
Pennell NA, Neal JW, Chaft JE, Azzoli CG, Janne PA, Govindan R, Evans TL, Costa DB, Wakelee HA, Heist RS et al: SELECT: A Phase II Trial of Adjuvant Erlotinib in Patients With Resected Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019, 37(2):97–104.
Zhong WZ, Wang Q, Mao WM, Xu ST, Wu L, Shen Y, Liu YY, Chen C, Cheng Y, Xu L et al: Gefitinib versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant treatment for stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) EGFR-mutant NSCLC (ADJUVANT/CTONG1104): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2018, 19(1):139–148.
Li N, Ou W, Ye X, Sun HB, Zhang L, Fang Q, Zhang SL, Wang BX, Wang SY: Pemetrexed-carboplatin adjuvant chemotherapy with or without gefitinib in resected stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations: a randomized, phase II study. Ann Surg Oncol 2014, 21(6):2091–2096.
Yue D, Xu S, Wang Q, Li X, Shen Y, Zhao H, Chen C, Mao W, Liu W, Liu J et al: Erlotinib versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant therapy in Chinese patients with stage IIIA EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EVAN): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Respir Med 2018, 6(11):863–873.
Huang Q, Li J, Sun Y, Wang R, Cheng X, Chen H: Efficacy of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the Adjuvant Treatment for Operable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer by a Meta-Analysis. Chest 2016, 149(6):1384–1392.
Raphael J, Vincent M, Boldt G, Shah PS, Rodrigues G, Blanchette P: Adjuvant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Clin Oncol 2019, 42(5):440–445.
Tang W, Li X, Xie X, Sun X, Liu J, Zhang J, Wang C, Yu J, Xie P: EGFR inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for resected non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations. Lung Cancer 2019, 136:6–14.

No competing interests reported.

SupplementaryAppendix.docx

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
03 Jun, 2022
Reviews received at journal
29 May, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
20 May, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
19 May, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
19 May, 2022
Editor invited by journal
13 May, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
13 May, 2022
First submitted to journal
09 May, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Prognostic impact of pretreatment T790M mutation on outcomes for patients with resected, EGFR-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Patients

Statistical analysis

Results

Patient characteristics

Impact Of Pretreatment T790m On Rfs

Impact Of Pretreatment T790m On Os

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1