Synthesis of TPA-2a-SDA and TPA-ester
Synthesis of tris(4-acetylphenyl)amine : In a 250 mL two-neck round bottom flask, triphenylamine (0.5 g, 2.04 mmol) was dissolved in anhydrous dichloromethane (10 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere. Slowly aluminium chloride (AlCl3) (0.84 g, 6.32 mmol) dissolved in dichloromethane (5 mL) was added under stirring, and the whole mixture was cooled to 273 K. Then acetyl chloride (0.5 g, 6.32 mmol) was added dropwise at 273 K. After the addition was complete, and the reaction mixture was stirred and allowed to reach room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was poured into ice water (125 mL), the organic layer was extracted with dichloromethane (3 x 50 mL), dried on MgSO4, collected and evaporated (630 mg, 83%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, ppm): 7.92 (d, 6H, J = 8.6 Hz, Ar), 7.17 (d, 6H, J = 8.6 Hz,Ar), 2.81 (s, 9H, COCH3).
Synthesis of tris(4-carboxyphenyl)amine : Tris(4-acetylphenyl)amine (450 mg, 1.21 mmol) was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (12.5 mL) in a three-neck round bottom flask. Meantime, in a beaker, bromine (0.62 mL, 12.12 mmol) was added dropwise to an aqueous (7.5 mL) solution of NaOH (1.59 g, 40 mmol) cooled by ice bath. After the addition of the bromine solution to round bottom flask, the solution was stirred for 20 min at room temperature. The solution was transferred in a dropping funnel and dropped into the solution of tris(4-acetylphenyl)amine. The mixture was stirred and heated at 313 K overnight. Then, the mixture was cooled at 273 K using an ice bath and saturated under stirring with hydroxylamine HCl to deoxidize the excess of formed sodium bromite (NaBrO2). The solution was acidified by HCl (37%) till pH = 1.5. The pale yellow precipitate was filtered and dried under vacuum. The crude product was recrystallized from acetic acid to afford pure one. (432 mg, 94%) 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, ppm): 7.90 (d, 6H, J = 8.6 Hz, Ar), 7.16 (d, 6H, J = 8.6 Hz, Ar), 12.71 (broad singlet, 3H, COOH).
Synthesis of Tris(4-carbomethoxyphenyl)amine : 50 mL three round bottom flask fitted with a magnetic stirrer and a heating oil bath was charged with tris(4-carboxyphenyl)amine (0.15 g, 0.40 mmol) 5 mL of methanol, and 0.3 mL of H2SO4. The mixture was heated up to 343 K and refluxed for 6h, and finally cooled to room temperature. A green solid Tris(p-carbomethoxyphenyl)amine was obtained after ethyl acetate/brine extraction and evaporation of organic layer. (161 mg, 96%) 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400MHz, ppm): 7.92 (d, 6H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ar), 7.16 (d, 6H, J = 8.4 Hz, Ar), 3.83 (s, 9H, COOCH3).
Synthesis of tris(4-((2-aminoethyl)carbamoyl)phenyl)amine (TPA-EDA) : Flesh ethylene diamine of 20 mL (excess, 0.225 mol) was placed in a 50 mL three flask, and then Tris(4-carbomethoxyphenyl)amine (0.15 g, 0.36 mmol) dissolved in 50 mL methanol in advance was slowly added into the solution through a constant pressure funnel. The mixture was stirred under nitrogen atmosphere at 273 K for 30 min, and then reflux at 343 K for 18h. Excess ethylene diamine was removed by rotary evaporation. The crude product was dissolved in methanol/toluene (1/10 by volume) mixed solvents and re-evaporated to remove the residual ethylene diamine three times. Small amount of methanol was poured into the residual solution and the solution was poured into 1 L of ethylacetate to precipitate the product. Yellowish solid was obtained. (152 mg, 84%) 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, ppm): 8.40 (s, 3H, NHCO), 7.82 (d, 6H, J = 8.6 Hz, Ar), 7.09 (d, 6H, J = 8.6 Hz, Ar), 3.27 (d, 6H, J = 5.9 Hz, CONHCH2), 2.71 (d, 6H, J = 6.4 Hz, CH2NH2).
Synthesis of tris(4-((2-(trideca-4,6-diynamido)ethyl)carbamoyl)phenyl)amine (TPA-2a-SDA) : TPA-EDA (0.1 g, 0.20 mmol), SDA (0.20 g, 1.00 mmol) and 1-Hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBT) (0.16 g, 1.20 mmol) were dissolved in 20 mL of DMF. The reaction mixture was stirred at 273 K for 30min. 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) (0.23 g, 1.20 mmol) and Et3N (0.16 mL, 1.20 mmol) were added into the solution. The solution was warmed up to RT. It was stirred for 24h at 343 K. The reaction mixture was poured into brine and extracted with dichloromethane. The organic layer was washed with water (2 times) and the precipitate which formed on the boundary was filtered off. The organic layer was evaporated and precipitated with hexane. The precipitate was purified by column chromatography two times (dichloromethane: methanol = 19:1 and subsequently dichloromethane: methanol = 9:1). (57 mg, 25%) Matrix-assisted laser absorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectroscopy, m/z 1090.74 [M + Na]+ (Calcd: 1067.62) 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, ppm): 8.47 (t, 3H, J = 5.2 Hz, CONH), 8.07 (t, 3H, J = 5.2 Hz, NHCO), 7.81 (d, 6H, J = 8.5 Hz, Ar), 7.10 (d, 6H, J = 8.6 Hz, Ar), 3.29 (t, 6H, J = 5.8 Hz, NHCH2), 3.21 (t, 6H, J = 5.3 Hz, CH2NH), 2.29 (m, 12H, COCH2, C ≡ CCH2) 1.42 (m, 6H, CH2CH2), 1.29 (m, 6H, CH2CH2), 1.24 (m, 12H, CH2CH2), 0.85 (t, 9H, CH2CH3) 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 150 MHz, ppm): 170.74, 166.04, 135.91, 129.87, 129.34, 123.74, 78.74, 77.57, 38.79, 34.26, 31.09, 28.31, 28.11, 22.40, 18.71, 15.30, 14.33.
Synthesis of tris(4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl)amine : In a 250 mL two-neck round bottom flask, tris(4-formylphenyl)amine (100 mg, 0.30 mmol) and sodium borohydride (50 mg, 1.32 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (40 mL) and ethanol (15 mL). After stirring for 2 h at room temperature, the solution was extracted with dichloromethane and brine. The organic layer was collected and evaporated, which subsequently was precipitated in hexane and filtered. (99 mg, 99%) 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, ppm): 7.21 (d, 6H, J = 8.6 Hz, Ar), 6.91 (d, 6H, J = 8.5 Hz, Ar), 5.09 (t, 3H, J = 5.7 Hz, CH2OH), 4.44 (d, 6H, J = 5.7 Hz, CH2OH).
Synthesis of tris(4-((trideca-4,6-diynoyloxy)methyl)phenyl)amine (TPA-ester) : In a two-neck round bottom flask, tris(4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl)amine (75 mg, 0.23 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane. To the solution, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (4-DMAP) (136 mg, 1.12 mmol), SDA (230 mg, 1.12 mmol) and DCC (230 mg, 1.12 mmol) were added at 0oC, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 16 h. The solution was washed by brine and evaporated. The washed solution was precipitated in hexane to remove urea. After the solution was purified by column chromatography three times, 1) hexane, 2) hexane: ethyl acetate = 1:1 and 3) hexane: ethyl acetate = 1:3 eluents. (46 mg, 23%). Matrix-assisted laser absorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectroscopy, m/z 900.64 [M + H]+ (Calcd: 899.52) 1H NMR (Acetone-d6, 400MHz, ppm): 7.34 (d, 6H, J = 8.7 Hz, Ar), 7.05 (d, 6H, J = 8.7 Hz, Ar), 5.12 (s, 6H, CH2OOC), 2.61 (m, 12H, CH2C ≡ CC ≡ CCH2), 2.23 (t, 6H, J = 6.4 Hz, COCH2), 1.48 (m, 6H, CH2CH2), 1.30 (m, 18H, CH2CH2CH2), 0.88 (t, 9H, J = 6.9 Hz, CH2CH3). 13C NMR (Acetone-d6, 100 Hz, ppm): 170.99, 147.41, 131.07, 129.45, 123.91, 77.86, 75.51, 65.79, 65.55, 65.15, 37.70, 31.09, 29.57, 28.08, 22.29, 18.45, 14.64, 13.40.
Formation of chiral supramolecular helical nanofibers by light.
To irradiate light during the self-assembly, Lumatec SUV-DC-P which had a wavelength range of 280–500 nm and a maximum intensity of 370 nm was used as a light source. To irradiate visible light, a filter with 400 nm of cut-off wavelength was placed in front of the light source. Circularly polarized light was formed by placing a linear polarizer and a λ/4 wave-plate in front of the light source. Samples were placed at 5 cm from the lamp and external light was blocked to precisely investigate the effect of CPL. For dissolution of TPA-2a-SDA, ultra-sonication was applied to the solution of TPA-2a-SDA (1.0 mg∙mL-1) at room temperature, and the solution was cooled to -10 oC while exposing to CPL.
Mathematical models to characterize supramolecular polymerization process.
To investigate the self-assembly behavior of TPA-SDA and TPA-2a-SDA, variable temperature CD measurement was conducted. Non-sigmoidal curves were obtained by plotting the degree of aggregation (\({\alpha }\)agg) against temperature for two monomers, which indicate cooperative supramolecular polymerization process. By fitting the graph with Meijer-Schenning-van der Schoot model, the detailed thermodynamic parameters for self-assembly processes were obtained. We used their elongation regime for fitting of the graph by Eq. 1:
\({\varphi }_{n}\) =\({\varphi }_{SAT}\left(1-exp\left[(-{h}_{e}\right.\right.)\times (T-{T}_{e})/(R\times {T}_{e}^{2}\left)\right])\) (Eq. 1)
In this equation, \({h}_{e}\) means the molecular enthalpy release due to the noncovalent interactions during elongation. T is absolute temperature, \({T}_{e}\) is the elongation temperature and R is the gas constant. \({\varphi }_{SAT}\) is introduced as a parameter to ensure that \({\varphi }_{n}/{\varphi }_{SAT}\) does not exceed unity.
DFT calculation.
The self-assembled structures of the three TPA derivatives were determined using computational based density functional tight binding (DFTB) calculations. To calculate the interaction energy of the self-assembled structures, optimization of the geometries of both the monomer and pentamer structures was conducted35,36. For the initial pentamer structures, the monomers were stacked using a geometrical factor, such as the N-N distance and a rotation angle. Because self-assembled structures have huge numbers of atoms, the DFTB calculation was performed using the DFTB + program. For all DFTB calculations, the 3ob-3-1 parameter was used and the DFTB3-D3H5 method was applied to describe hydrogen bonds better37,38.