3.1 Cutting Force and Temperature
Figure 5 shows the change of feed force, main cutting force, and radial force with the different types of lubrication. The cutting forces of the New-T cutting are the lowest, while the cutting forces of the Dry-T cutting are the biggest. Compared with the Dry-T cutting and the MQL-T cutting, the New-T lubrication cutting force FX decreased by 26.7% and 14.3%, FY decreased by 20.5% and 10.9%, and FZ decreased by 14.5% and 5.9%. It means that the application of the New-T lubrication is superior in reducing cutting force.
Figure 6 indicates the change of cutting temperature with the different types of lubrication. The cutting temperature is 259.3℃, 129.9℃, and 155℃ in the cutting area of the Dry-T cutting, the MQL-T cutting, and the New-T cutting. Due to the action of friction and plastic deformation, three regions will generate lots of heat during the cutting process, as shown in Fig. 7(a) and (b). Arrows of red, yellow, and green represent the direction of heat flow. For the conventional MQL lubrication, the atomized cutting fluid will enter the top of the cutting chip, the back face of the tool, and the cutting transition surface to cool the cutting area [27], as can be seen from Fig. 7(a). However, atomized cutting fluid of the New-T lubrication flows out of the micro-channel and only plays a cooling role in the tool-chip interface, as can be seen from Fig. 7(b). And the amount of cutting fluid for cooling is lower than the MQL-T cutting. Therefore, the cooling effect of the MQL-T cutting is better than the New-T cutting.
3.2 Friction Coefficient and Length of tool-chip contact interface
According to the value of the three-way cutting force, the average friction coefficient of rake face, friction angle, and shear angle can be calculated based on the following formulas [28]:
$$\begin{array}{c}\mu =\text{tan}\beta =\text{tan}\left({\gamma }_{o}+arctan\frac{{F}_{x}}{{F}_{z}}\right)\left(2\right)\end{array}$$
$$\begin{array}{c}\beta =\text{arc}\text{tan}\left(\mu \right)\left(3\right)\end{array}$$
$$\begin{array}{c}\varphi ={45}^{o}-\beta \left(4\right)\end{array}$$
Where \(\mu\) is average friction coefficient at rake face, \(\beta\) is friction angle, \(\varphi\) is shear angle, \({\gamma }_{o}\) is rake angle.
Figure 8 illustrates the average friction coefficient at the rake face of different lubrication types. It can be known from the figure that the average friction coefficient of the New-T lubrication is the lowest, the average friction coefficient of the MQL-T lubrication is next, and the average friction coefficient of the Dry-T cutting is the largest.
This is mainly associated with the amount of cutting fluid entering the tool-chip interface. In the process of the Dry-T cutting, there was no cutting fluid entering the tool-chip interface to form lubrication film in the worn area for cooling and lubricating, then the chips contact with the tool substance directly. Thus, the friction coefficient is the largest. During the MQL-T cutting process, the flowing chips mainly have bulk contact with the tool rake face and are followed by elastic contact just before leaving the contact with the tool, and elastic contact allows slight penetration of the cutting fluid only over a small region by capillary action [29]. Therefore, the atomized cutting fluid is difficult to enter the tool-chip interface to play a role of lubricating and cooling in the vicinity of the main cutting edge, as shown in Fig. 9(a). Some scholars have proved that the capillary axis is perpendicular to the main cutting edge and randomly distributed on the tool-chip contact interface with the flowing of the cutting chip [30, 31]. During the cutting process, capillaries run throughout the whole tool-chip contact interface [32]. Compared with the MQL-T cutting, the New-T cutting can directly supply the atomized cutting fluid to enter the tool-chip contact interface. Assuming that the pumping efficiency of capillaries remains constant. Due to the micro-channel outlet on the rake face, some capillaries passing through the outlet are truncated. This not only shortens the distance between atomized cutting fluid and the main cutting edge but also increases the efficiency of the pump of capillaries and promotes the diffusion of atomized cutting fluid in the worn area of the rake face, as shown in Fig. 9(b).
The friction angle and shear angle of different lubrication method can be calculated by the formulas (2), (3), and (4). The fiction angle of the Dry-T cutting, the MQL-T cutting, and the New-T cutting is 35.67°, 34.25°, and 31.73°. The shear angle of the Dry-T cutting, the MQL-T cutting, and the New-T cutting is 9.33°, 10.75°, and 13.27°.
The formula for the total length of the tool-chip contact is following [33, 34]:
$$\begin{array}{c}{L}_{f}=a\frac{\xi +2}{2}\bullet \frac{\text{sin}\left(\varphi +\beta -{\gamma }_{o}\right)}{\text{sin}\varphi \text{cos}\beta }\left(5\right)\end{array}$$
$$\begin{array}{c}\xi =\frac{{a}_{1}}{a}\left(6\right)\end{array}$$
Where \({L}_{f}\) is the total length of tool-chip contact interface, a is the undeformed chip thickness, \({a}_{1 }\)is real chip thickness, \(\xi\) is the chip thickness coefficient.
Meanwhile, the total length of the tool-chip contact contains the length of the tool-chip contact of the adhesive area and the length of the tool-chip contact of the slide area, which can be calculated by the following formulas [35]:
$$\begin{array}{c}{L}_{f2}={L}_{f}-{L}_{f1}\left(7\right)\end{array}$$
$$\begin{array}{c}{L}_{f1}={L}_{f}\left[1-{\left(\frac{{\tau }_{s}}{{\mu }_{2}{\sigma }_{o}}\right)}^{\frac{1}{\xi }}\right]\left(8\right)\end{array}$$
$$\begin{array}{c}\frac{{\tau }_{s}}{{\sigma }_{o}}=\frac{\xi +2}{4\left(\xi +1\right)}\bullet \frac{\text{sin}\left[2\left(\varphi +\beta +{\gamma }_{o}\right)\right]}{{\left(\text{cos}\beta \right)}^{2}}\left(9\right)\end{array}$$
$$\begin{array}{c}{\mu }_{2}=\frac{{\tau }_{s}}{{\sigma }_{o}}\frac{1}{{\left(1-\frac{\frac{\mu {\sigma }_{o}}{{\tau }_{s}}-1}{\xi }\right)}^{\xi }}\left(10\right)\end{array}$$
Where \({L}_{f2}\) is the length of tool-chip contact of adhesive area, \({L}_{f1}\) is the length of tool-chip contact of slide area, \(\frac{{\tau }_{s}}{{\sigma }_{o}}\) is the dimensionless constant, \({\mu }_{2}\) is the friction coefficient of slide area.
According to the above formulas (8), (9), and (10), the \({\text{L}}_{\text{f}}\) and \({\text{L}}_{\text{f}1}\) are proportional to friction angle and inversely proportional to shear angle and rake angle. Figure 10 indicates that the \({\text{L}}_{\text{f}}\), \({\text{L}}_{{\text{f}}_{1}}\) and \({\text{L}}_{{\text{f}}_{2}}\) have a marked decline due to the application of cutting fluid. Compared with the MQL-T lubrication, the New-T lubrication can directly supply the atomized cutting fluid to enter the tool-chip contact interface to cooling and lubricating, which contributes to the formation of the lubrication film. The value of the friction angle of the New-T lubrication is less than the MQL-T lubrication. Therefore, the length of the tool-chip contact interface of the Dry-T cutting is the longest, and the New-T lubrication is the shortest.
The average friction coefficient of the rake face contains the average friction coefficient of the adhesive area and the average friction coefficient of the slide area, which can be calculated by the formula (10) and the following formula [35]:
$$\begin{array}{c}{\mu }_{1}=\frac{{\tau }_{s}}{{\sigma }_{o}}\frac{{L}_{f1}\left(1+\xi \right)}{{L}_{f}\left[1-{\left(\frac{{L}_{f}-{L}_{f1}}{{L}_{f}}\right)}^{\xi +1}\right]}\left(11\right)\end{array}$$
Due to the adhesive area and slide area of the rake face having different wear patterns, the friction coefficient shows different changing rules under diverse conditions of cutting lubrication. Figure 11 shows the change of the average friction coefficient of the adhesive area and the average friction coefficient of the slide area. Compared with the Dry-T cutting, the friction coefficient of both the adhesive and slide worn area of the MQL-T lubrication decreased significantly. Compared with the MQL-T lubrication, the decrease of the friction coefficient of both the adhesive and slide wear area of the New-T lubrication is more pronounced. It means that the lubrication performance of the New-T lubrication is rather than the MQL lubrication.
3.3 Wear Mechanism
Figure 12 shows the wear surface of the tool tip and the rake face under three lubrication conditions. It can be seen in Fig. 12(a), (b), and (c) that the volume of built-up edge on the tool tip of the Dry-T cutting is the biggest, and the size of the built-up edge on the tool tip of the MQL-T cutting is next, and the size of built-up edge on the tool tip of the New-T cutting is the smallest. This situation is related to the cutting temperature and the lubrication of the cutting fluid. Due to the action of cooling and lubricating of cutting fluid, the volume of built-up edge on the tool tip of the MQL-T cutting and the New-T cutting is relatively minor. However, the size of the built-up edge on the tool tip of the New-T cutting is smaller than the MQL-T cutting, because the cutting fluid of the New-T cutting is easier to enter the regions of the main and auxiliary cutting edge and to play a role of cooling and lubricating during the cutting process.
It can be seen from Fig. 12(d), (e), and (f) that there are a large number of furrows, micropores, and adhesive materials at the worn area of the rake face of the Dry-T cutting. During the MQL-T cutting process, the number of furrows, micropores, and adhesive materials at the wear area of the rake face reduced. While the furrows on the rake face of the New-T cutting almost disappeared, the number of micropores and adhesive materials in the worn area also decreased significantly. The furrows on the worn area are mainly caused by abrasive wear. In the cutting process, providing there is no lubricating and cooling of cutting fluid, it is difficult to form a film on the tool-chip contact interface, which makes the chip and the material of the tool contact directly. In addition, the cutting heat generated by cutting cannot dissipate in time, and the hardness of the rake face will decrease sharply at high temperatures. As a result, when the hard point in the chip across the rake face, many furrows are left in the tool-chip contact interface. The conventional MQL-T lubrication has a better cooling effect during the cutting process, then the hardness of the rake face is less affected by temperature. Therefore, the number of furrows is reduced. There is little difference between the cutting temperature of the New-T lubrication and the MQL-T lubrication, while the New-T lubrication can supply the atomized cutting fluid to enter the tool-chip contact interface directly, then the furrows almost disappear. The micropores and adhesive materials in the worn area are mainly caused by adhesive wear. In the cutting process, the chip’s atoms and the tool’s atoms were adhered to together by the cutting condition of high temperature and high pressure. Because the adhesive point suffers from a strong impact during the cutting process, the cutting strength at a part of the adhesive point is lower than the tool strength, which will be torn from the chip and left at the rake face of the cutting tool. And the cutting strength at the other adhesive point is higher than the tool strength, which will be torn from the tool and taken away by chip flow. Therefore, many micropores and adhesive materials appeared on the worn area of the rake face. Compared with the Dry-T cutting, the number of adhesive points on the worn area of the MQL-T cutting was reduced due to the lubrication film on the tool-chip interface. In the New-T cutting process, because the cutting fluid enters the tool-chip contact interface more efficiently, the formation rate of lubrication film is faster than the MQL-T lubrication. Because the diffusion efficiency of the New-T lubrication is better than that of the MQL-T lubrication, the range of lubrication film formation is bigger than the MQL-T lubrication. Therefore, the number of adhesive points on the tool-chip interface of the New-T lubrication is less than the MQL-T lubrication, so the number of micropores and adhesive materials is less than the MQL-T lubrication. Meanwhile, proving that the lubrication efficiency of the New-T lubrication is better than the MQL-T lubrication.
In a word, the above analysis shows that abrasive wear and adhesive wear are the main wear mechanism for the Dry-T cutting and the conventional MQL-T cutting, while the wear mechanism of the New-T cutting is dominated by adhesive wear.
Due to the influences of mechanical and thermal actions in the tool-chip contact interface, the elements in the cutting fluid will combine with the tool material and penetrate the tool surface. In order to compare the permeability of cutting fluid under the MQL-T and the New-T lubrication conditions, EDS elements analysis of the worn area of two lubrication conditions was implemented by us. Figure 13 and Fig. 14 show the analysis results and the type of elements.
Most of the P and S elements in Fig. 13 are on the outside of the tool-chip contact interface of the rake face, and only a small part of the P and S elements distribute in the vicinity of the main and auxiliary cutting edge. Because the S and P elements are the unique elements of the cutting fluid, indicating that the cutting fluid is difficult to enter the too-chip contact interface to lubricate during the cutting process. However, the number of S and P elements in the vicinity of the main and auxiliary cutting edge are obviously larger in Fig. 14 than in Fig. 13. Consequently, the above analysis illustrates that the permeability of the New-T lubrication is better than the MQL-T lubrication.
Because the cutting material is 45steel, thus, it can be known the effectiveness of these two lubrication methods in resisting adhesive wear by comparing the amount of Fe elements on the rake face. In addition, the cutting fluid is atomized by press air, and the high-speed airflow increases the oxygen concentration around the tool. Due to the high-temperature environment, the tools and the adhesive materials are easily oxidized, then the tool strength will gradually decrease with the deepening of the oxidation degree. Figure 13 shows that Fe and O elements are more abundant in the area of severe wear on the rake face than in the same area of Fig. 14. However, Fig. 14 shows that Fe and O elements are significantly less than Fig. 13 in the area of severe wear on the rake face, and most of them are distributed near the main and auxiliary cutting edge. This phenomenon also proves that the antioxidant performance of the New-T lubrication is better than that of the MQL-T lubrication.
There are some materials in the outlet of the micro-channel shown in Fig. 15(a). Figure 15(b) is the analysis result of the EDS element scanning on this material. It can be known that is the workpiece materials. Figure 16 is the schematic diagram of derivative cutting at micro-channel export. The edge of the micro-channel export can be viewed as the cutting edge of derivative cutting when the chip flows through the micro-channel export, which makes the workpiece material at the bottom of the chip separate by extrusion and friction and forming derivative chips. Derivative cutting will not only wear and destroy the micro-channel export but also adhere to the micro-channel export due to the action of cold welding, blocking the outlet. It is recommended to fillet the edge of the micro-channel outlet to avoid derivatives during the cutting process.