Orthopedic rehabilitation after computer assisted surgical reconstruction of the mandible using deep circumflex iliac artery grafts – a cross sectional study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1652629/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Orthopedic rehabilitation after computer assisted surgical reconstruction of the mandible using deep circumflex iliac artery grafts – a cross sectional study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1652629/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 09 Jan, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Surgery →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Computer Assisted Design and Computer Assisted Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) has revolutionized oncologic surgery of the head and neck. A multitude of benefits of this technique has been described, but there are only few reports of donor site comorbidity following CAD/CAM surgery.

Methods: This study investigated comorbidity of the hip following deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) graft raising using CAD/CAM techniques. A cross-sectional examination was performed to determine range of motion, muscle strength and nerve disturbances. Furthermore, correlations between graft volume and skin incision length with postoperative orthopedic rehabilitation were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation, linear regression and analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results: Fifteen patients with a mean graft volume of 21.2 ± 5.7 cm³ and a mean incision length of 228.0 ± 30.0 mm were included. Patients reported of noticeable physical limitations in daily life activities (12.3 ± 11.9 weeks) and athletic activities (38.4 ± 40.0 weeks in mean) following surgery. Graft volume significantly correlated with the duration of the use of walking aids (R = 0.57; p = 0.033) and impairment in daily life activities (R = 0.65; p = 0.012). The length of the scar of the donor-site showed a statistically significant association with postoperative iliohypogastric nerve deficits (F = 4.4, p = 0.037). Patients with anaesthaesia of a peripheral cutaneous nerve had a larger mean scar length (280 ± 30.0 mm) than subjects with hypaesthesia (245 ± 10.1 mm) or no complaints (216 ± 27.7 mm).

Conclusions: Despite sophisticated planning options in modern CAD/CAM surgery comorbidity of the donor site following microsurgery is still a problem. This study is the first to investigate comorbidity after DCIA graft raising in a patient group treated exclusively with CAD/CAM techniques. The results indicate that a minimal invasive approach in terms of small graft volumes and small skin incisions could help to reduce postoperative symptomatology.

Trial registration: Retrospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00029066); registration date: 23/05/2022.

mandible reconstruction

deep circumflex iliac artery

comorbidity

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the sixth most common cause of death among all cancer-related diseases ¹ with an increasing incidence, especially in younger patients. ² In 2018, approximately 700,000 new cases and 350,000 deaths due to OSCC were estimated worldwide, making it a global health issue. ³ Especially advanced cases of OSCC need fast and radical treatment to enable adequate long-term survival. ^3–5

In surgical treatment of OSCC, tumor-free resection is aspired and therefore radical surgery is performed. ^3,6 OSCC mostly affects the mandible, ⁷ therefore resections of the mandible are frequently required, leading to large defects of the lower jaw. ⁸ Subsequent plastic reconstruction of the mandible is crucial to enable a proper rehabilitation of the stomatognathic system including mastication, deglutition and speech as well as the aesthetic appearance of the face. ^9–11 The current gold standard in reconstructing bony defects of the mandible are microvascular free flaps. ³

After the introduction of microsurgical techniques, different donor-sites were described for harvesting osteocutaneous free flaps. ¹² The first successful free flap surgery was performed using an autotransplant of omentum to a large scalp defect. ¹³ Hidalgo first described the free fibula flap (FFF) as a microvascular transplant to be used in the head and neck area. ¹⁴ The scapula osteocutaneous free flap (SOFF) and the iliac crest flap supplied by the deep circumflex artery (DCIA) present valuable alternatives for bony reconstruction in maxillofacial surgery and were described shortly after. ^15,16 Depending on the localization and the size of the defect, the choice of specific graft may provide particular advantages in the reconstruction process. The FFF has emerged to be the gold standard in the reconstruction of the mandible. Due to the wide section of dense cortical bone supplied by the fibula, it became indispensable when forming a neo-mandible. ¹⁷ The SOFF, on the other hand, is used preferably for the reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint, as the scapular tip can be used for anatomical replacement of the condylar head. Moreover, by raising the latissimus dorsi muscle, a high volume of soft tissue can be harvested alongside the SOFF. ^18,19 The DCIA graft provides anatomically shaped bone with sufficient vertical height resembling the anatomical form of the mandibular body. ²⁰ Additionally, it offers excellent conditions for subsequent placement of osseointegrating dental implants. ^21,22 Due to its favorable characteristics some authors even proposed the DCIA graft as transplant of choice for reconstruction of the mandible. ^10,11

Due to the widespread use of computed tomography (CT) and computer-assisted image processing, the options for preoperative planning have improved significantly in recent decades. ^23–25 Computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) was introduced to maxillofacial surgery by Hirsch et al. and continuously improved plastic reconstruction in head and neck surgery. ²⁶ By segmentation of the anatomical structures and three-dimensional visualization of the surgical sites, meticulous preoperative planning can be performed using CAD/CAM. Besides mere visualization purposes CAD/CAM transfers the surgical plan into the operation theatre using 3D-printed drilling and cutting guides and can therefore facilitate surgery. ²⁷

Besides considerations focusing on the oncological as well as the functional and aesthetic outcome of the stomatognathic system, comorbidities of the donor-site have to be taken into account. Current literature report controversial results regarding donor-site morbidity after harvesting of DCIA graft and is mostly based on mere reviews of electronic medical records. Chronic pain, gait disturbances and neurosensory deficits are only a few of the known adverse effects described in the context of DCIA graft reconstructions. ^20,28,29 However, to date only few studies investigate donor-site morbidity after CAD/CAM driven DCIA graft harvesting. As CAD/CAM techniques have been in routine clinical use for only a decade and OSCC patients face limited long-term survival rates, data investigating the donor-site morbidity by physical follow-up is difficult to acquire. ²⁰

This study aimed to assess the importance of the graft volume and incision length on postoperative donor-site morbidity in patients receiving a CAD/CAM-driven DCIA graft reconstruction of the mandible. For this purpose, thorough chart review, evaluation of imaging data and postoperative physical examination was performed. The hypothesis of this study was to prove that CAD/CAM-assisted DCIA graft harvesting causes relevant donor-site morbidity and minimal invasive approaches may help to improve the orthopedic outcome of those patients.

This study was conceived in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the ethics committee of the Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Germany (573/19). All participants gave written informed consent for study implementation. The structuring of the manuscript was performed regarding to the STROBE guidelines. ³⁰

Study group

This cross-sectional study investigated donor-site morbidity of patients who received a CAD/CAM-driven DCIA graft reconstruction of the mandible following resection of OSCC in our single tertiary center (Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Center— University of Freiburg, Germany). Patients who underwent CAD/CAM-driven DCIA graft reconstruction of the mandible were identified by thorough review of all electronic patient charts of our clinic and were invited for physical follow-up examination.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Patients included in this study were at least 18 years old, signed a written declaration of consent, could attend an appointment for physical examination and were able to cooperate during physical examination. The period between surgical treatment and physical examination had to be at least twelve months.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients under 18 years of age, patients who did not agree with study implementation and patients with previous surgeries in the pelvic area. Mandible reconstructions due to diseases other than OSCC, secondary reconstructions, or reconstructions which were performed without the use of CAD/CAM-techniques were also excluded.

Preoperative planning procedure

Preoperative planning was performed in collaboration with a technician of the virtual planning vendor (KLS Martin Group, Tuttlingen, Germany) during a web meeting using high-resolution CT scans of the head, neck and pelvis (slice thickness ≤ 1mm). The underlying CT data was segmented and displayed for virtual 3D-visualization. Taking into account the patient-specific anatomy, the resection margins, the section and size of the pelvic used for graft harvesting and, if necessary, osteotomies within the graft were determined (Fig. 1). Afterwards fitting of the planned graft with the resected mandible was virtually assessed. Once planning was complete, sawing and drilling guides and an individual osteosynthesis plate for surgical transfer of the virtual plan and fixation of the graft respectively are designed and manufactured.

Surgical procedure

Surgery was performed under general anesthesia using a two-team approach to reduce surgery time. Team time-out was carried out before surgery. Graft harvesting was always performed by the same team.

Raising of the microvascular DCIA graft

After standardized surgical site skin preparation and application of local anesthesia, a premarked skin incision was made. The abdominal fascia was exposed and incised one fingerbreadth above the inguinal ligament. The deep circumflex iliac artery was located and vessels to the iliac artery were traced. Transection of the externus, internus and transversus abdominis muscle was performed. Subsequently, the externus abdominis muscle, the gluteus medius muscle and the tensor fascia latae muscle were detached from the external side of the iliac crest using a raspatorium (Fig. 2). The 3D-printed cutting guide was placed in the planned anatomical position (Fig. 3). Osteotomies and predrilling of the screw-holes were performed as specified by the guide (Fig. 4). The patient specific osteosynthesis plate was fixated to the bone graft using the predrilled holes (Fig. 5). Afterwards, the iliacus muscle was detached from the iliac surface of the graft. The graft was stored in moist sterile cloths while the vessel remained pedicled, until the graft was needed at the resection site. Once the pedicle vessels were cut, wound closure was performed using sutures to fixate the iliacus, transversus and internus muscle to the iliac fossa first. The externus muscle and the abdominal fascia were sutured subsequently. The suture of the skin was completed with multiple layer sutures of the subcutis and skin.

Data acquisition

After review of all documented surgeries performed at the Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Center— University of Freiburg, Germany in a period between June 2017 and June 2020, patients who underwent CAD/CAM-driven DCIA graft reconstruction of the mandible were identified. All collected data was saved in a Microsoft excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel® Version 16.0, Microsoft Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, USA).

Review of patient charts and imaging data

By reviewing all electronic patient charts, information regarding the hospital stays and therapy was collected (age at the time of surgery, operating time, length of stay at intensive care unit (ICU) and surgical ward, postoperative outcome parameters). Postoperative imaging data was used to determine the volume of the raised DCIA graft. Using an open source software the CT-scan was segmented and the volume of the inserted graft was determined by volumetric measurement of the graft. ³¹

Interviews

Before physical examination a structured interview was conducted by one investigator (TM) using a predefined questionnaire. The questionnaire included questions regarding general health conditions (nicotine or alcohol consumption, autoimmune diseases, diabetes mellitus) and postoperative features of daily life (postoperative pain, intake of analgesics, limitation in daily or physical activities and use of walking aids).

Physical examination

Physical examination was performed by one investigator (TM) on both legs in order to directly compare the operated leg with the unaffected leg. 1.) The range of motion (ROM) of the hip joint was measured using a goniometer and given as angular degrees for the following directions of movement: flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and interior rotation/external rotation. 2.) The muscle strength during hip flexion was determined using the muscle function test according to Janda. ³² 3.) The sensitivity of peripheral cutaneous nerves of the leg and pelvic area (iliohypogastrc, ilioinguinal, genitofemoral and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve) was performed using a cotton bud. Moreover, the length of the scar at the donor-site was determined with a ruler, as it corresponds to the length of the surgical skin incision.

Statistical analysis

The collected data was transferred into the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences ® Version 26.0 for further analysis (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY, IBM Corporation). Variables were tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test and for homoscedasticity using Levene's test where appropriate. Associations between variables scaled ordinal were tested for statistical significance using Spearman's rank correlation. The influence of metric-scaled predictors on equally metric-scaled clinical end points was also examined in the form of multiple linear regression. Group comparisons were performed determining an independent categorical variable and a dependent metric-scaled variable using single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). The influence of age, sex, graft volume, graft diameter, and length of skin incision on donor-site-morbidity was examined using Spearman's rank correlation, multiple linear regression, or analysis of variance (ANOVA). In contrast, for connected samples, the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. The significance level was set to p = 0.05 in all cases.

Study group characteristics

After first review of all documented surgeries in the mentioned period, 38 patients were eligible for study implementation. Six patients were unavailable, two patients could not manage to travel to our clinics for physical examination due to long distances and 13 patients denied study participation. Eventually fifteen patients (five women and ten men) with a mean age of 65.5 ± 10.3 years (minimum: 53; maximum: 84 years) could be included in this study.

Review of patient charts and imaging data

Operating time ranged from 5 to 16 hours, with a mean of 11.8 ± 3.0 hours. Patients stayed at the ICU and the surgical ward for 5.7 ± 3.5 and 25.8 ± 15.0 days respectively. The volume of the raised DCIA graft ranged between 12.1 cm³ and 30.3 cm³ with a mean of 21.2 ± 5.7 cm³. Raising of a soft tissue bulk alongside the DCIA graft was performed in one-third (5/15) of all patients. Harvesting of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) was performed in 12 out of 15 cases. Postoperative development of hernia was detected in three patients. Two patients required revision of surgery during the follow-up period. No complication due to local hematoma of the transplant site wad documented. Local recurrence occurred in one patient. One patient died during the follow-up period.

Interviews

Five patients confirmed regular alcohol consumption, seven patients reported of regular smoking. One patient suffered from diabetes mellitus, two patients of autoimmune diseases. Patients reported of physical limitations in daily life activities for 12.3 ± 11.9 weeks in mean. Athletic activities were impossible for 6 to 115 weeks after surgery (38.4 ± 40.0 weeks in mean). Walking aids were used for 2 to 115 weeks postoperatively (37.1 ± 44.8 weeks in mean). Analgesics were required for a mean of 10.1 ± 6.5 weeks. At the time of examination, patients mostly reported no or low pain sensation of the hip (visual analog scale mean 0.3 ± 0.8). Table 1 gives an overview of anamnestic features regarding general health conditions. Table 2 summarizes study group characteristics investigated by chart review.

Table 1

Anamnestic features regarding general health conditions reported by the patients during interview (SD = standard deviation).
Parameter	Yes	No
Alcohol consumption	5 (33,3%)	10 (66,7%)
Smoking	7 (46,7%)	8 (53,3%)
Diabetes mellitus	1 (6,7%)	14 (93,3%)
Autoimmune disease	2 (13,3%)	13 (86,7%)

Table 2

Characteristics of the study group regarding therapy and postoperative rehabilitation identified by interview, chart review and evaluation of postoperative CT-scans (SD = standard deviation).
Parameter	Mean ± SD	Minimum	Maximum
Length of skin incision in mm	228 ± 29,93	180	280
Graftat volume in mm3	21173,70 ± 5645,75	12133,48	30294,85
Duration of surgery in hours	11,8 ± 3,00	5	16
Duration of in-hospital stay in days	25,80 ± 15,02	4	50
Duration of stay at ICU in days	5,67 ± 3,50	1	11
Impairment in daily life activities in weeks	12,27 ± 11,87	3	52
Impairment in athletic activities in weeks	38,40 ± 39,66	6	115
Duration of the use of walking aids in weeks	37,07 ± 44,76	2	115
Duration of intake of painkillers in weeks	10,14 ± 6,46	4	26
Visual analogue scale at day of examination (no unit specified)	0,33 ± 0,82	0	3

Physical examination

Range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength of the hip joint, as well as neurosensory deficits of the unaffected and operated side were examined and are presented in Tables 3–5. The length of the scar at the graft site amounted 228.0 ± 30.0 mm in mean (minimum: 180mm; maximum: 280 mm).

Table 3

ROM of the hip joint of the surgical and unaffected side and the difference between both sides (SD = standard deviation).
Parameter	Mean ± SD		Maximum
Extension surgical side	7,67 ± 3,20	5	10
Extension unaffected side	7,00 ± 3,16	5	10
Difference in extension	0,00 ± 1,89	(-) 5	5
Flexion surgical side	106,00 ± 11,68	80	120
Flexion unaffected side	116,00 ± 11,98	90	145
Difference in flexion	-10,00 ± 14,88	(-) 50	10
Abduction surgical side	33,00 ± 11,62	20	55
Abduction unaffected side	33,00 ± 12,22	15	55
Difference in abduction	0,00 ± 11,18	(-) 20	5
Adduction surgical side	23,67 ± 6,94	10	35
Adduction unaffected side	24,00 ± 6,60	15	35
Difference in adduction	-0,33 ± 4,42	(-) 10	5
Internal rotation surgical side	17,33 ± 5,63	10	25
Internal rotation unaffected side	22,33 ± 9,23	10	40
Difference in internal rotation	-5,00 ± 5,67	(-) 15	0
External rotation surgical side	30,33 ± 8,34	25	50
External rotation unaffected side	29,67 ± 9,35	5	45
Difference in external rotation	0,67 ± 8,84	(-) 10	20

Table 4

Comparison of the muscle strength of the surgical and unaffected side during flexion of the hip joint given by the total number and proportion of patients (in brackets) with no differences between both sides, weaknesses at the surgical side and weaknesses at the unaffected side (SD = standard deviation).
Motion	No differences	Weakness at surgical side
Extension	13 (86,7%)	2 (13,3%)
Flexion	6 (40%)	9 (60%)
Abduction	9 (60%)	6 (40%)
Adduction	14 (93,3%)	1 (6,7%)
Internal rotation	11 (73,3%)	4 (26,7%)
External rotation	9 (60%)	6 (40%)

Table 5

Comparison of the sensibilitiy of cutaneous peripheral nerves of the surgical and unaffected side given by the total number and proportion of patients (in brackets) with no differences between both sides, hypesthesia at the surgical side and anesthesia at the surgical side (SD = standard deviation).
Peripheral cutaneous nerve	Physiologic sensibility	Hypesthesia	Anesthesia
Lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh	4 (26,7%)	8 (53,3%)	3 (20%)
Genitofemoral nerve	10 (66,7%)	5 (33,3%)	0 (0%)
Iliohypogastric nerve	10 (66,7%)	4 (26,6%)	1 (6,7%)
Ilioinguinal nerve	8 (53,3%)	7 (46,7%)	0 (0%)

Statistical analyses

Parameters acquired by interview

Graft volume significantly correlated with the duration of the use of walking aids (R = 0.57; p = 0.033) and impairment in daily life activities (R = 0.65; p = 0.012). There was no statistical correlation of any patient specific factors with duration of hospital stay, pain sensation or intake of analgesics.

Range of motion

Comparing the ROM of the hip joint of the operated leg with the unaffected leg, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant lower values in flexion (-10.0° ± 14.9°; p = 0.012) and internal rotation (-5.0° ± 5.7; p = 0.006) of the operated leg. There were hardly any differences when examining abduction, adduction, external rotation, and extension (Table 6). The period between surgery and physical examination did not significantly correlate with differences in ROM of the hip joint between the operated and the unaffected leg. Age correlated significantly with differences in extension (R = (-) 0.53; p = 0.042) and abduction (R = 0.656; p = 0.008) between the operated and the unaffected leg. Graft volume was correlated significantly with differences in internal rotation (R = (-) 0,594; p = 0.025) between the operated and the unaffected leg.

Table 6

Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for patient specific factors age (in years), follow-up interval (in weeks), length of skin incision (in cm), graft diameter (in cm), graft volume (in cm³) and difference of ROM of the hip joint between the operated and the unaffected side. Significant values are indicated with * for p ≤ 0.05 and ** for p ≤ 0.01.
Difference of ROM	Age	Follow-up	Skin incision	Graft diameter	Graft volume
In extension (°)	(-) 0,530 *	(-) 0,064	(-) 0,042	(-) 0,255	0,094
In flexion (°)	0,086	(-) 0,193	0,095	(-) 0,135	0,011
In abduction (°)	0,656 **	(-) 0,025	0,32	0,104	0,007
In adduction (°)	0,344	(-) 0,331	(-) 0,244	0,048	0,265
In internal rotation (°)	0,219	0,092	(-) 0,167	0,162	(-) 0,594 *
In external rotation (°)	0,169	0,255	0,378	0,373	(-) 0,408

Muscle strength

In the investigation of muscle strength during flexion if the hip joint according to Janda, the operated leg revealed to be less powerful in all directions of movement, especially during flexion. No statistical correlations could be found between age, sex, graft volume, length of skin incision and muscle strength (Table 7).

Table 7

Evaluation of the differences of muscle strength during flexion of the hip joint between the operated and unaffected side in dependence of patient specific factors age (in years), follow-up interval (in weeks), length of skin incision (in cm), graft diameter (in cm and, graft volume (in cm³) using ANOVA. Significance level of the correlation is given by the according p-value. No significant correlation could be identified.
Difference of muscle strength	Age	Follow-up	Skin incision	Graft diameter	Graft volume
In extension	0.165	0.944	0.53	0.724	0.309
In flexion	0.302	0.333	0.334	0.445	0.092
In abduction	0.689	0.278	0.125	0.795	0.248
In adduction	0.217	0.962	0.098	0.718	0.668
In internal rotation	0.377	0.536	0.07	0.447	0.219
In external rotation	0.342	0.971	0.084	0.138	0.747

Sensitivity of the peripheral cutaneous nerves

Testing the sensitivity of the peripheral cutaneous nerves, reduction in sensation (n = 8), as well as loss of sensation (n = 3) of the lateral cutaneus femoris nerve was noticeable (Table 8). The length of the scar of the donor-site showed a statistically significant association with postoperative iliohypogastric nerve deficits (F = 4.4, p = 0.037). Patients with anaesthaesia of a peripheral cutaneous nerve had a larger mean scar length (280 ± 30.0 mm) than subjects with hypaesthesia (245 ± 10.1 mm) or no complaints (216 ± 27.7 mm).

Table 8

Evaluation of the differences of nerve disturbances at the operated side in dependence of patient specific factors age (in years), follow-up interval (in weeks), length of skin incision (in cm), graft diameter (in cm) and graft volume (in cm³) using ANOVA. Significance level of the correlation is given by the according p-value. Significant values are indicated with * for p ≤ 0.05
Disturbance of sensibility	Age	Follow-up	Skin incision	Graft diameter	Graft volume
Lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh	0.405	0.585	0.437	0.491	0.113
Genitofemoral nerve	0.246	0.191	0.542	0.691	0.777
Iliohypogastric nerve	0.259	0.842	0,037 *	0.28	0.405
Ilioinguinal nerve	0.099	0.369	0.553	0.486	0.119

This study found a significant correlation between the volume of the raised DCIA graft and postoperative use of walking aids and impairment in daily life activities. Moreover, a significant correlation between incision length and neurosensory deficits of the iliohypogastric nerve could be identified. The severity of detected neurosensory deficits correlated with the length of the skin incision: anesthesia of peripheral cutaneous nerves was associated with long skin incisions (280 ± 30.0 mm), whereas patients with hypesthesia and normal neurosensory function had shorter skin incisions (245 ± 10.1 mm and 216 ± 27.7 mm respectively). These results confirm that surgery should be performed as minimally invasive as possible to reduce postoperative donor-site morbidity.

ROM of the hip joint of both legs was investigated during physical examination to quantify the impairment induced by surgery. Flexion and internal rotation were decreased significantly (-10.0° ± 14.9° and − 5.0° ± 5.7 respectively) in comparison to the unaffected leg, while other directions of motion were hardly affected after graft harvesting (Table 2). This shows that raising of DCIA grafts has detrimental effects on mobility of the hip in general and predominantly affects specific motions. As harvesting of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) was frequently performed to obtain an anatomical reconstruction of the mandible (12/15), contraction of muscles originating from the ASIS could cause pain after surgery. Therefore, a significant restriction of flexion and internal rotation may be explained by painful sensations at the ASIS caused by the sartorius and tensor fasciae latae muscle. ³³

ANOVA was used to investigate further relations of ROM with patient-specific factors (Table 6). Controversially older patients experienced pronounced impairment in abduction of the operated leg (R = 0.656; p = 0.008), while age and graft volume correlated with smaller deficits in extension (R = (-) 0.53; p = 0.042) and internal rotation, (R = (-) 0,594; p = 0.025). Even though a recent retrospective study reported no significant correlation between age and donor-site morbidity, ³⁴ general physical impairment of the elderly may reasonably explain a more severe impairment after surgery. Nonetheless, there is no reasonable explanation why older patients, or patients who underwent more extensive DCIA graft harvesting should experience fewer postoperative restriction of ROM. The most likely reason for these contentious results may be the weak validity of goniometric measurements and the small sample size of this study. ³⁵

Investigation of muscle strength equally showed that the performed surgery using CAD/CAM impairs functionality on the operated leg. Especially flexion (60% of patients), abduction (40% of patients) and internal rotation (27% of patients) were weaker in comparison to the opposite leg (Table 7). Likewise, low significance of the results may be explained by the low validity of the applied examination technique and its susceptibility depending on the individual perception of the rater. ^36,37 There was no significant impact of graft volume on measurements regarding ROM and perceived muscle strength of the leg.

In the last two years, three systematic reviews were published summarizing the findings regarding donor-site morbidity after head and neck reconstruction of the last 20 years ^20,28,29. Despite the abundance of existent publications, ^{21,34,38−50} only few studies are available, which investigate the impact of graft volume on donor-site morbidity after mandibular reconstruction using DCIA grafts ^34,51,52. None of them performed physical examinations of patients. In comparison to the average raised bone volume described in literature (15cm³), this study presents a study group with relatively high mean graft volume of 21,17 ± 5,65 cm³. ⁵²

Katz et al. performed a retrospective chart review of DCIA graft patients and could acquire information about the graft volume in 65% of the investigated cases. A mean graft volume of 8.4 ± 6.9 cm³ was found ³⁴. No specifications concerning the applied surgical technique (CAD/CAM vs. conventional surgery) was made. The volume of the bone graft as stated in the reviewed charts was significantly correlated with a longer hospital stay. No correlation of graft volume with functional outcome parameters could be found, due to limited availability of these information by the retrospective study design. This underlines the importance of a post-operative interview and clinical examination, to collect detailed and reliable information. Furthermore, the significance of clinical examinations could be increased, by decrease the influence of the examiner. Valentini et al proposed using electrophysiological measurements to reliably determine the function of peripheral cutaneous nerves ²¹.

Ghassemi et al. performed a prospective interview with a mixed study group receiving vascular and avascular iliac crest grafts without using CAD/CAM-techniques ⁵¹. The correlation between graft volume and postoperative donor-site morbidity was evaluated. Patients with vascularized grafts showed higher graft volumes and were statistically more often exposed to sensible and functional impairment.

As CAD/CAM-techniques have only been part of the clinical routine for ten years, just one other study (Liu et al.) reports of donor-site morbidity in a study population, in which CAD/CAM was used consistently for DCIA graft harvesting. ⁴⁵ Instead of determining graft volume, Liu et al. collected information about the length of the anterior iliac graft and skin incision to investigate the impact of the invasiveness of the surgery on donor-site morbidity. In contrast to our study, no significant correlations could be identified. As the length of the anterior iliac graft is only measured in one dimension, it does not necessarily correlate with the volume of the graft or the invasiveness of the surgery. Thus, the impact of the examined factors may not be detected properly due to methodological drawbacks.

Investigations regarding neurosensory deficits of the pelvis after conventional iliac crest harvesting have been conducted previously ^{34,40,44,45,47,49}. None of the studies found a significant correlation between incision length and neurosensory abnormalities.

The localizations of nerve alterations most frequently stated in literature (iliohypogastric nerve and cutaneous femoral lateral nerve) are consistent with the findings of this study. ^40,44,49 Interestingly, strongly varying frequencies of sensory alterations are reported in literature: While some authors ³⁴ report of only a few patients (2%) and short periods of nerve alterations (< 1 month), others report of a great portion of patients (up to 93%) suffering hyp- or anesthesia in the pelvic region. ⁴⁰ In this study, nerve impairments were found with an incidence of 53%, which is in the middle range of current literature statings. Findings regarding neurosensory deficits may vary due to the heterogeneity of the existent studies: Depending on the applied surgical technique (mono- vs. bicortical, CAD/CAM vs. conventional, microvascular vs. avascular) and study design (chart review vs. questionnaire vs. clinical examination) postoperative deficits may occur with different frequencies and may be detected with varying reliability. Clinical examinations may exhibit more detailed information about the postoperative function of the hip, than mere retrospective chart review. Finally yet importantly, the time of study conduction may influence postoperative findings, as surgical techniques have improved. ⁵³

In general, the small sample size of this study (n = 15) obliges cautious interpretation of the presented results. Anatomical or functional peculiarities of our specific study group may affect statistical analysis, which is why generalizability of our results remains questionable. Advanced investigations with larger study groups may be necessary to reveal the true effect of DCIA graft harvesting on postoperative impairment of the leg.

Modern CAD/CAM-techniques allow a detailed pre-surgical planning process and aim to improve surgical outcomes. Despite sophisticated preoperative planning options, donor-site morbidity was present in our CAD/CAM-study group. A significant correlation of graft volume with the duration of the use of walking aids and impairment in daily life activities was found, suggesting that surgeons should aim for the smallest possible graft volume in preoperative planning. Additionally, in this study minimally invasive surgical approaches appeared to be superior in terms of neurosensory function, as severe nerve deficits were associated with long skin incisions. The clinical examinations performed showed no statistical correlation of graft volume or skin incision length with ROM or muscle strength. However, preliminary evidence of the association between minimally invasive approaches and better orthopedic rehabilitation after DCIA graft harvesting was obtained. Future studies should conduct clinical trials on larger study groups to determine the impact of surgical invasiveness on postoperative morbidity at the donor site.

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Germany (Protocol #573/19)

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).

Availability of data and materials

The data presented in this study is available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy reasons.

Competing interests

There are no competing interest to declare.

Funding

There is no funding to declare.

Authors’ contributions

The author Brandenburg, LS contributed to conception and design, to acquisition, drafted and critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval. The author agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

The author Voss, PJ contributed to conception and design, contributed to interpretation, critically revised manuscript and gave final approval. The author agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

The author Mischkowsky, T contributed to conception and design, to acquisition and gave final approval. The author agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

The author Kühle, J critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval. The author agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

The author Ermer, M critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval. The author agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

The author Weingart, JV contributed to scientific writing, critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval. The author agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

The author Rothweiler, RM critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval. The author agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

The author Metzger, MC critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval . The author agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

The author Schmelzeisen, R critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval. The author agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

The author Poxleitner, P critically revised the manuscript and gave final approval. The author agrees to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy.

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted as part of the doctoral degree in dentistry (Dr. med. dent.) of TM at the Medical Faculty of the University of Freiburg.

Sarode G, Maniyar N, Sarode SC, Jafer M, Patil S, Awan KH. Epidemiologic aspects of oral cancer. Disease-a-Month. 2020;66(12):100988. doi:10.1016/j.disamonth.2020.100988
Du M, Nair R, Jamieson L, Liu Z, Bi P. Incidence Trends of Lip, Oral Cavity, and Pharyngeal Cancers: Global Burden of Disease 1990–2017. J Dent Res. 2020;99(2):143–151. doi:10.1177/0022034519894963
Machiels JP, Leemans CR, Golusinski W, Grau C, Licitra L, Gregoire V. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx: EHNS–ESMO–ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Annals of Oncology. 2020;31(11):1462–1475. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.011
Brandenburg LS, Schwarz SJ, Weingart JV, Metzger MC, Fuessinger MA, Ermer MA. Do Red Blood Cell Transfusions Influence Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Primary Surgery for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021;79(7):1570–1579. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2021.01.040
Brandenburg LS, Metzger MC, Poxleitner P, et al. Effects of Red Blood Cell Transfusions on Distant Metastases of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Cancers (Basel). 2021;14(1):138. doi:10.3390/cancers14010138
Chi AC, Day TA, Neville BW. Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma—an update. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2015;65(5):401–421. doi:10.3322/caac.21293
Sundermann BV, Uhlmann L, Hoffmann J, Freier K, Thiele OC. The localization and risk factors of squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity: A retrospective study of 1501 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46(2):177–182. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2017.10.019
Smith RB, Sniezek JC, Weed DT, Wax MK, Microvascular Surgery Subcommittee of American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. Utilization of free tissue transfer in head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(2):182–191. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2007.04.011
Goh BT, Lee S, Tideman H, Stoelinga PJW. Mandibular reconstruction in adults: a review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008;37(7):597–605. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2008.03.002
Kakarala K, Shnayder Y, Tsue TT, Girod DA. Mandibular reconstruction. Oral Oncology. 2018;77:111–117. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.020
Lonie S, Herle P, Paddle A, Pradhan N, Birch T, Shayan R. Mandibular reconstruction: meta-analysis of iliac- versus fibula-free flaps. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2016;86(5):337–342. doi:10.1111/ans.13274
Schmelzeisen R, Schliephake H. Interdisciplinary microvascular reconstruction of maxillary, midfacial and skull base defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;26(1):1–10. doi:10.1016/s1010-5182(98)80028-0
McLean DH, Buncke HJ. Autotransplant of omentum to a large scalp defect, with microsurgical revascularization. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972;49(3):268–274. doi:10.1097/00006534-197203000-00005
Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84(1):71–79.
Coleman JJ. The Bipedicled Osteocutaneous Scapula Flap: A New Subscapular SystemFree Flap. Published online 1991.
Taylor GI. Reconstruction of the mandible with free composite iliac bone grafts. Ann Plast Surg. 1982;9(5):361–376. doi:10.1097/00000637-198211000-00003
Weyh AM, Fernandes RP. Narrative review: fibula free flap, indications, tips, and pitfalls. Frontiers of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine. 2021;3(0). doi:10.21037/fomm-20-43
Voss PJ, Steybe D, Fuessinger MA, et al. Vascularized scapula and latissimus dorsi flap for CAD/CAM assisted reconstruction of mandibular defects including the mandibular condyle: technical report and clinical results. BMC Surg. 2019;19(1):67. doi:10.1186/s12893-019-0535-3
Rothweiler R, Metzger MC, Voss PJ, Beck J, Schmelzeisen R. Interdisciplinary management of skull base surgery. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021;11(4):601–607. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.09.002
Hilven PH, Vranckx JJ. The Iliac Crest Osteomuscular Flap for Bony Reconstruction: Beast or Beauty? A Reassessment of the Value and Donor Site Morbidity in the CAD/CAM Era. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021;37(8):671–681. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1724129
Valentini V, Gennaro P, Aboh IV, Longo G, Mitro V, Ialongo C. Iliac crest flap: donor site morbidity. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(4):1052–1055. doi:10.1097/scs.0b013e3181abb21d
Schmelzeisen R, Neukam FW, Shirota T, Specht B, Wichmann M. Postoperative function after implant insertion in vascularized bone grafts in maxilla and mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97(4):719–725. doi:10.1097/00006534-199604000-00005
Essert C, Joskowicz L. Chapter 32 - Image-based surgery planning. In: Zhou SK, Rueckert D, Fichtinger G, eds. Handbook of Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. The Elsevier and MICCAI Society Book Series. Academic Press; 2020:795–815. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-816176-0.00037-5
Preim B, Botha C. Chapter 18 - Image-Guided Surgery and Augmented Reality. In: Preim B, Botha C, eds. Visual Computing for Medicine (Second Edition). Morgan Kaufmann; 2014:625–663. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-415873-3.00018-3
Ruprecht A. Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology: Then and Now. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2008;139:S5-S6. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0355
Hirsch DL, Garfein ES, Christensen AM, Weimer KA, Saddeh PB, Levine JP. Use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to produce orthognathically ideal surgical outcomes: a paradigm shift in head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(10):2115–2122. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.02.007
Ahmed KS, Ibad H, Suchal ZA, Gosain AK. Implementation of 3D Printing and Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in Craniofacial Reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. Published online February 14, 2022. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000008561
Gu Y, Ma H, Shujaat S, et al. Donor- and recipient-site morbidity of vascularized fibular and iliac flaps for mandibular reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(7):1470–1479. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.055
Russell J, Pateman K, Batstone M. Donor site morbidity of composite free flaps in head and neck surgery: a systematic review of the prospective literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;50(9):1147–1155. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2020.12.009
Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13(Suppl 1):S31-S34. doi:10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. 3D Slicer as an Image Computing Platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1323–1341. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
Janda V. Manuelle Muskelfunktionsdiagnostik. Urban und Fischer; 2000.
Tsutsumi M, Nimura A, Akita K. Clinical anatomy of the musculoskeletal system in the hip region. Anat Sci Int. 2022;97(2):157–164. doi:10.1007/s12565-021-00638-3
Katz MS, Ooms M, Heitzer M, et al. Postoperative Morbidity and Complications in Elderly Patients after Harvesting of Iliac Crest Bone Grafts. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57(8):759. doi:10.3390/medicina57080759
Ore V, Nasic S, Riad J. Lower extremity range of motion and alignment: A reliability and concurrent validity study of goniometric and three-dimensional motion analysis measurement. Heliyon. 2020;6(8):e04713. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04713
Cerda Vega E, Jerez-Mayorga D, Machado Payer R, et al. Validity and reliability of evaluating hip abductor strength using different normalization methods in a functional electromechanical device. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202248. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202248
Widler KS, Glatthorn JF, Bizzini M, et al. Assessment of hip abductor muscle strength. A validity and reliability study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(11):2666–2672. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01119
Qu X, Zhang C, Yang W, Wang M. Deep circumflex iliac artery flap with osseointegrated implants for reconstruction of mandibular benign lesions: clinical experience of 33 cases. Ir J Med Sci. 2013;182(3):493–498. doi:10.1007/s11845-013-0921-2
Mücke T, Loeffelbein DJ, Kolk A, et al. Comparison of outcome of microvascular bony head and neck reconstructions using the fibular free flap and the iliac crest flap. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(6):514–519. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.01.007
Schardt C, Schmid A, Bodem J, Krisam J, Hoffmann J, Mertens C. Donor site morbidity and quality of life after microvascular head and neck reconstruction with free fibula and deep-circumflex iliac artery flaps. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017;45(2):304–311. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.014
Ling XF, Peng X, Samman N. Donor-site morbidity of free fibula and DCIA flaps. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71(9):1604–1612. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2013.03.006
Sudhakar KNV, Mohanty R, Singh V. Evaluation of Donor Site Morbidity Associated with Iliac Crest Bone Harvest in Oral and Maxillofacial, Reconstructive Surgery. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(6):ZC28-ZC33. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/28688.10053
Rendenbach C, Goehler F, Hansen L, et al. Evaluation of long-term functional donor-site morbidity after deep circumflex iliac crest artery bone flap harvest. Microsurgery. 2019;39(4):304–309. doi:10.1002/micr.30358
Kansy K, Hoffmann J, Alhalabi O, et al. Long-term donor site morbidity in head and neck cancer patients and its impact on quality of life: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;48(7):875–885. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.009
Liu Q, Shao Z, Shang Z. Mandibular reconstruction using the deep circumflex iliac artery free flap: effect of the length of bone harvested on donor site morbidity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57(8):778–781. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.07.011
Zheng L, Wu W, Shi Y, Zhang J. Mandibular Reconstruction With a Deep Circumflex Iliac Artery Flap Using Computer-Assisted and Intraoral Anastomosis Techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(12):2567–2572. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.033
Baqain ZH, Anabtawi M, Karaky AA, Malkawi Z. Morbidity from anterior iliac crest bone harvesting for secondary alveolar bone grafting: an outcome assessment study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(3):570–575. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.09.023
Bettini G, Saia G, Valsecchi S, Bedogni G, Sandi A, Bedogni A. Three-dimensional CAD/CAM reconstruction of the iliac bone following DCIA composite flap harvest. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021;50(1):32–37. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2020.05.014
Gaggl AJ, Bürger H, Chiari FM. A combined superficial inferior epigastric artery flap and vascularized iliac crest flap in the reconstruction of extended composite defects of the posterior mandible and adjacent soft tissue: first clinical results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(2):162–168. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.001
Cariati P, Farhat MC, Dyalram D, Ferrari S, Lubek JE. The deep circumflex iliac artery free flap in maxillofacial reconstruction: a comparative institutional analysis. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;25(3):395–400. doi:10.1007/s10006-020-00930-y
Ghassemi A, Ghassemi M, Riediger D, Hilgers RD, Gerressen M. Comparison of donor-site engraftment after harvesting vascularized and nonvascularized iliac bone grafts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(8):1589–1594. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.013
Kessler P, Thorwarth M, Bloch-Birkholz A, Nkenke E, Neukam FW. Harvesting of bone from the iliac crest–comparison of the anterior and posterior sites. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;43(1):51–56. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.08.026
Kerr RS. Surgery in the 2020s: Implications of advancing technology for patients and the workforce. Future Healthc J. 2020;7(1):46–49. doi:10.7861/fhj.2020-0001

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 09 Jan, 2023

Read the published version in BMC Surgery →

Editorial decision: Major revision
26 Oct, 2022
Reviews received at journal
22 Oct, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
13 Oct, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
25 Jun, 2022
Reviews received at journal
19 Jun, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
02 Jun, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
30 May, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
30 May, 2022
Editor invited by journal
30 May, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
30 May, 2022
First submitted to journal
13 May, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Orthopedic rehabilitation after computer assisted surgical reconstruction of the mandible using deep circumflex iliac artery grafts – a cross sectional study

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Materials And Methods

Study group

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Preoperative planning procedure

Raising of the microvascular DCIA graft

Data acquisition

Review of patient charts and imaging data

Interviews

Physical examination

Statistical analysis

Results

Study group characteristics

Review of patient charts and imaging data

Interviews

Physical examination

Statistical analyses

Parameters acquired by interview

Range of motion

Muscle strength

Sensitivity of the peripheral cutaneous nerves

Discussion

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1