The crystal structure of CeO2 and as-prepared samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction as shown in Fig. 1a. All samples exhibited the well-defined diffraction peaks at 28.7o, 33.3o, 47.7o, and 56.6o, which corresponded to the (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes of CeO2 (JCPDS no. 34–0394) [15, 16]. Interestingly, the samples, prepared under the condition that the volume ratios of H2O to EG were 25:5, 20:10, 15:15, and 10:20, showed several new peaks at 17.7o, 24.6o, 30.5o, 35.9o, 43.3o and 44.0o, which were assigned to the (002), (300), (032), (004), (330), and (304) planes of Ce(OH)CO3 (JCPDS no. 52–0352) [17], indicating the formation of CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composite. Besides, the intensity of these peaks increased with the increasing of EG proportion in the solvent, indicating the increasing of Ce(OH)CO3 content in the CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composite. The Ce(OH)CO3 content in the CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composite reached the maximum value at H2O/EG ratio of 10:20. Thus, the content of Ce(OH)CO3 in CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composite could be controlled by adjusting the solvent composition. In the range of the volume ratio of H2O to EG from 25:5 to 10:20, the smaller the volume ratio of H2O to EG, the larger the content of Ce(OH)CO3 in CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composite.
The FT-IR spectra of as-prepared samples were shown in Fig. 1b. The stretching vibration of Ce-O bonds caused a wide band in the range of 500–700 cm− 1 [18], and the absorption peak at 3460 cm− 1 was the stretching vibration of the hydroxyl group [19]. For the CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composites prepared under the condition that the volume ratios of H2O to EG were 25:5, 20:10, 15:15, and 10:20, the broad peaks between 1417 and 1496 cm− 1 were ascribed to the stretching vibration of the CO32− groups [20]. The sharp absorption peaks at 694 cm− 1, 725 cm− 1 and 850 cm− 1 were caused by the bending vibration of the CO32− groups [21]. The XRD and FT-IR results indicated that the samples obtained when the volume ratios of H2O to EG of 30:0, 5:25, and 0:30 were CeO2 while at the other ratios were CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composites.
Figure 2 showed the SEM images of CeO2 and as-prepared samples under different H2O/EG volume ratios. CeO2 displayed apparent 2D layered structure. When the volume ratios of H2O to EG were 30:0 and 25:5, the 2D layered structure was destroyed and a few small particles appeared, which was attributed to the forced hydrolysis of
CeO2. As the amount of EG in the solvent increased, the destroyed layered structure gradually recovered and thickened, and the CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composite showed a pie-like structure with stacked pieces when the volume ratio of H2O and EG was 10:20, then the morphology of the sample was consistent with the CeO2 nanosheets.
Figure 3 are the XRD patterns of the samples prepared at volume ratio of H2O to EG for 10:20 with different temperatures. It was clear that the samples just showed the characteristic diffraction peaks of CeO2, and Ce(OH)CO3 cannot be synthesized when the reaction temperature was lower than 200°C. When the reaction temperature was 200°C, the characteristic diffraction peaks of CeO2 and Ce(OH)CO3 were obvious, indicating the formation of CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composite. The corresponding SEM image was shown in Fig. 4. When the reaction temperature was lower than 200°C, the morphology of the sample had not been destroyed and it was still a 2D layered structure. The sample obtained at 200°C exhibited a pie-like structure with stacked pieces. Based on the above results, it can be deduced that CeO2 undergoes forced hydrolysis under the conditions of high reaction temperature, and the forced hydrolysis of CeO2 is a precondition for the formation of CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composite in this reaction.
In our synthesis set-up, the reaction process of the formation of Ce(OH)CO3 can be proposed. It is actually a dissolution-recrystallization process. For CeO2, it was forced to hydrolyze at high temperature and released Ce4+ which was reduced to Ce3+ by EG. Trivalent Ce3+ was easily changed into Ce(OH)2+ groups. As for EG, it was gradually oxidized to oxalic acid [22], then released carbon dioxide. Then carbon dioxide reacted with water to produce CO32−. Finally, Ce(OH)2+ combined with CO32− to yield Ce(OH)CO3. The reaction can be expressed as follows:
CeO2 + H2O → Ce(OH)4 (1)
Ce(OH)4 \(\leftrightharpoons\) Ce4+ + 4OH− (2)
Ce4+ → Ce3+ (3)
Ce3+ + OH− → CeOH2+ (4)
(CH2OH)2 → CHOCH2OH → CHOCOOH → (COOH)2 → CO2 (5)
CO2 + H2O → CO32− + 2H+ (6)
CeOH2+ + CO32− → Ce(OH)CO3 (7)
Thus the forced hydrolysis of CeO2 (Reaction 1) and the release of Ce4+ (Reaction 2) were crucial for the formation of Ce(OH)CO3 which was the reason why the sample prepared under low reaction temperature or with low water content in the solvent cannot produce Ce(OH)CO3. Besides, Ce(OH)4 cannot be completely ionized to release Ce4+ (Reaction 2). Therefore, the conversion of CeO2 to Ce(OH)CO3 cannot be fully carried out, resulting the formation of CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composite. Due to the similar chemical properties, this method of synthesizing CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composite can be extended to rare earth elements with variable valences.
Figure 5 showed the UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of the samples obtained at 200°C for 24 h with various volume ratios of H2O to EG. The absorbance intensity of CeO2 nanosheets was weak. And there was no response in the visible region for CeO2 nanosheets. After hydrothermal treatment, the obtained samples all showed a weak response in the visible region at the range of 450ཞ800 nm. Besides, the UV-vis spectra of the obtained CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composites were red shifted with respect to the pure CeO2 nanosheets. The above results indicated that CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composites had better visible-light response which was favorable to photocatalytic activities.
The visible-light catalytic activities of the as-prepared samples were evaluated by the degradation of MB after irradiation for 2 hours as shown in Fig. 6. Obviously, 76.87% of MB was degraded over CeO2 photocatalyst. After hydrothermal treatment, the obtained samples all showed enhanced MB removal activity, among which the CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composites prepared at H2O/EG ratios of 25:5, 20:10, 15:15, and 10:20 exhibited better effect. The photodegradation efficiencies of the CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composites increased with the Ce(OH)CO3 content, and the highest photodegradation activity (98.84%) is observed for the CeO2/Ce(OH)CO3 composite prepared at a H2O/EG ratio of 10:20.