Table 1.1 showed the population distribution of the Lower Manya Krobo municipality by sub-districts
Table. 1.1 Lower Manya Krobo municipality population distribution by sub-district
SUB DISTRICT
|
POPULATION
|
PERCENTAGE
DISTRIBUTION (%)
|
Odumase
|
28,935
|
27.4
|
Agormanya
|
30,731
|
29.1
|
Kpong
|
24,500
|
23.2
|
Asitey
|
5,703
|
5.4
|
Akuse
|
9,504
|
9
|
Oborpa
|
6,231
|
5.9
|
Total
|
105,604
|
100
|
Table.1.2 Summary of study variables
Distribution of health facilities
Health facilities were classified into two broad areas: Main health facilities and supporting health centers. The main health facilities included hospitals, health centers, and CHPS and the supporting centers include pharmacies and licensed chemical shop.
Table. 1.3 Percentage distribution of categories of health facilities
|
|
|
(%)
|
Main facilities
|
|
|
16(35.55)
|
Supporting centers
|
|
|
29(64.44)
|
Total
|
|
|
45(100)
|
Geographical distribution of health facilities across LMKM
1. Distribution of CHPS compounds
The distribution of CHPS compounds in the municipality showed a major disparity in terms of the distribution of health resources. Sub-districts such as Agomanya and Kpong recorded more than half of the CHPS compound in LMKM. Asitey sub-district had only one CHPS (Ayermesu CHPS) for 5703 habitants and Oborpa sub-district also had one CHPS for 5965 population. Akuse sub-district despite its huge population of about 26,788, only one structured CHPS served the entire population.
2. Distribution of Hospitals and Health Centers across LMKM
There were 2 government hospitals and 1 mission hospital in the municipality. The map in Figure 1.3 displays an uneven distribution of hospitals across the LMKM. The northern and southern part of the municipality also has relatively poor hospital distribution, with virtually no hospital located in the northern sector of LMKM. Kpong sub-district, Oborpa sub-district, and Asitey sub-districts have 1 health center each. The other three sub-districts do not have health centers which happen to be one of the most affordable and accessible health services to the community members.
3. Distribution of pharmacies and chemical shops
Pharmacies seemed to be the most important health support services. Despite its importance, LMKM does not have enough subsequently making them unequally distributed across the municipality. As observed in figure 1.5, the northern and southern parts of the municipality completely lacked pharmacies making access to medication exceedingly difficult. Two of the pharmacies in the municipality were located in Odumase sub-district; one was located at Kpong and another in Agomanya. Almost all the chemical shops were clustered in Agomanya and Odumase sub-districts.
4. Distribution of main health facilities per sub-district
Table 1.4 showed the distribution of the main health facilities by sub-district. CHPS compounds formed most of these facilities followed by health centers. RCH centers and maternity homes were the least with only 1 each found in the Agomanya and Odumase sub-districts, respectively. It was observed that the Kpong, Oborpa and Asitey sub-districts were without hospitals and RCH centers. The number of chemical shops in the LMKM was on the high side compared to other facilities.
Table. 1.4 Distribution of main health facilities per sub-district
SUB DISTRICT
|
No. OF HOSPITAL
|
|
No. OF HC
|
No
RCH
|
No. OF CHPS
|
|
MATERNITY HOME
|
|
TOTAL
|
Odumase
|
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
1
|
3
|
Agomanya
|
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
0
|
4
|
Kpong
|
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
2
|
|
0
|
3
|
Oborpa
|
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
1
|
|
0
|
2
|
Akuse
|
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
1
|
|
0
|
2
|
Asitey
|
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
1
|
|
0
|
2
|
Total
|
|
3
|
4
|
1
|
|
7
|
|
1
|
16
|
5. Distribution of Health facility per population ratio per sub-district
Table 1.5 showed the health facility per population ratio in LMKM per sub-district. In computing the ratios, priority was given to the main health facilities specifically to those with high numbers in the municipality. The ratio for hospitals, health centers, and CHPS compounds was computed and displayed by virtue of the high numbers of CHPS compounds in LMKM relative to hospitals and health centers, the ratio of the population per number of CHPS (15,086:1) was by far better than that of hospitals and by extension health centers.
Table. 1.5 Health facility per population ratio per sub-district
SUB
DISTRICT
|
POPULATION
|
HOSPITALS
|
HC
|
|
CHPS
|
Odumase
|
28,935
|
28,935:1
|
|
26,935:1
|
0
|
Agomanya
|
30,731
|
30,731:1
|
|
0
|
15,366:1
|
Kpong
|
24500
|
0
|
|
24,500:1
|
2042:1
|
Oborpa
|
5965
|
0
|
|
5965:1
|
5965:1
|
Akuse
|
26788
|
26,788:1
|
|
0
|
26788:1
|
Asitey
|
5703
|
0
|
|
5703:1
|
5703:1
|
Total
|
105,604
|
35,201:1
|
|
26,401:1
|
15,086:1
|
6. Distribution of clinical health personnel
The study found that there was a challenge with clinical health personnel distribution in LMKM. For a population of 105,604, there were a total of 285 clinical workers: 9 doctors, 203 nurses, 65 midwives, and 8 physician assistants. Odumase and Akuse had the highest number of health personnel 107 and 91, respectively. Agomanya which was the most populated sub-district had fewer personnel of 47 as compared to 107 for Odumase. The doctor to population ratio of the LMKM stood at 11,734:1, a figure which was significantly less than the regional average of 17,438:1 (Ofosu, 2012). Sub-districts such as Kpong, Oborpa, and Asitey had extremely poor doctor population ratios. The nurse to population ratio in the municipality stood at 520:1, this is significantly better than the regional average which stood at 701:1.
Table. 1.6 Frequency distribution of clinical health personnel in the LMKM
SUBDISTRICT
|
POPULATION
|
DOCTORS
|
NURSES
|
MIDWIVES
|
PHYSICIAN
ASSISTANTS
|
TOTAL
|
ODUMASE
|
28,935
|
3
|
81
|
20
|
3
|
107
|
AGORMANYA
|
30,731
|
2
|
27
|
18
|
0
|
47
|
KPONG
|
24500
|
0
|
16
|
5
|
1
|
22
|
OBORPA
|
5965
|
0
|
9
|
1
|
0
|
10
|
AKUSE
|
26788
|
4
|
63
|
20
|
4
|
91
|
ASITEY
|
5703
|
0
|
7
|
1
|
0
|
8
|
TOTAL
|
105,604
|
9
|
203
|
65
|
8
|
285
|
7. Correlation between population and health personnel
A correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between clinical health personnel and the LMKM population.
Table. 4.12 Pearson’s correlation analysis of clinical health personnel against population
Health Personnel
|
Pearson’s correlation (r)
|
P-value
|
Doctors
|
0.70594
|
0.1170
|
Midwives
|
0.67391
|
0.1422
|
Nurses
|
0.87067
|
0.0240
|
Physician Assistants
|
0.54569
|
0.2627
|
For all categories excluding nurses, there was no significant relationship between the population and the number of doctors, midwives, and physician assistants as p-values 0.1170, 01422, and 0.2627 were recorded, respectively. There was a strong positive relationship between the number of nurses and the population (r = 0.87, p <0.05), implying an increase in population was followed by a corresponding increase in the number of nurses in LMKM.