Proximate composition in fresh and smoked S. lucioperca fillets
The amounts of proximate composition in fresh and smoked S. lucioperca fillets are reported in Fig. 1.
The amounts of proteins in fresh and smoked S. lucioperca fillets. Our data showed that proteins amounts remained stable in fresh fillets during the storage period (Fig. 2.A). Similar trends were observed for cold smoked fillets with and without D. salina (+ 0.5pp and + 1pp) that showing related amounts of proteins. Concerning hot smoking fillets, the amounts of proteins showed significant decreases S. lucioperca fillets especially after 20 and 90 days of storages (p < 0.01). Among the studied period, our results demonstrated significant increases of proteins amounts in all smoked fillets processes as compared to the fresh ones (p < 0.001).
The amounts of lipids in fresh and smoked S. lucioperca fillets. The amounts of lipids in fresh and smoked S. lucioperca fillets showed similar variations during the storage days (Fig. 2.B). Our results revealed significant decreases of lipids in fresh and smoked fillets after 20 and 90 days of storages (p < 0.01). On the other hand, significant increases of the amounts of lipids were recorded in cold and hot smoked fillets containing D. salina as natural antioxidant when compared to the fresh fillets (p < 0.001).
The amounts of total volatile basic nitrogen (TVBN) in fresh and smoked S. lucioperca fillets. The total volatile basic nitrogen in smoked S. lucioperca fillets changed significantly than the fresh ones (Fig. 2.C). Our results demonstrated that the TVBN increases progressively and significantly in fresh and smoked fillets after 20 days (p < 0.05) and remaining highly after 90 days of storage (p < 0.001). When comparing fresh with cold smoked fillets, our data showed that this process significantly decreased the amounts of TVBN especially when S. lucioperca fillets were mixed with + 1pp of D. salina (p < 0.01). Concerning the hot smoking process, similar variations were reported between the fresh and the hot smoked fillets while significant decreases were noted for TVBN amounts in S. lucioperca fillets mixed with + 0.5pp and + 1pp of D. salina (p < 0.001).
Fatty acid composition in fresh and smoked S. lucioperca fillets
According to Table 1, fatty acid composition of fresh fillets showed significant differences during the storage days as evidence by important increases of SFA, MUFA and decreases of PUFA after 20 and 90 days (p < 0.05). Data presented in Table 1 clearly revealed that cold smoking process changed significantly the fatty acids composition of S. lucioperca during the storage days. These changes were noticed by significant increases of SFA, MUFA and PUFA mainly at the first day of storage (p < 0.05), confirming by significant enhancement of their main groups such as C16:0, C14:0, C16:1n-7, C18:1n-7, PUFA n-6, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), arachidonic acid (ARA) and C18:2n-6 (p < 0.05). When zander fillets were mixed with D. salina at + 0.5pp, the amounts of SFA, MUFA increased significantly after 1 and 20 days while PUFA showed significant decrease only after 90 days of storage (p < 0.05). These depletions were appeared principally PUFA n-3, PUFA n-6, EPA, DHA and ARA acids (p < 0.001). Different trends were reported for zander fillets mixed with + 1pp of D. salina(Table 1). Our results showed significant increase of SFA after 1 day and PUFA after 20 and 90 days of storage (p < 0.05). However, MUFA and their principal compound C18:1n-7 decreases significantly with 1.5-fold after long term storage (20 and 90 days).
Table 1
Fatty acid composition of fresh (FF) and cold smoked (CSF) Sander lucioperca with Dunaliella salina as natural antioxidant at different concentrations (+ 0.5pp and + 1pp).
FA
|
FF
|
CSF
|
CSF + 0.5pp
|
CSF + 1pp
|
1 day
|
20 days
|
90 days
|
1 day
|
20 days
|
90 days
|
1 day
|
20 days
|
90 days
|
1 day
|
20 days
|
90 days
|
C14 :0
|
4.65±0.19a
|
5.09±1.12a
|
6.14±1.78b
|
5.72±0.25a
|
7.72±1.12b*
|
8.32±0.67c**
|
5.89±0.25a
|
6.41±1.52b
|
7.92±1.55c
|
6.72±1.05a*
|
7.12±1.78b**
|
8.01±1.23c***
|
C16 :0
|
16.4 ±0.89a
|
20.46±1.52b
|
22.19±2.5c
|
17.65 ±2.14a
|
18.23±1.95b*
|
21.29±1.48c
|
16.5 ±0.87a
|
17.57±2.4b**
|
20.76±2.48c*
|
18.21±1.56a**
|
18.31±2.55b
|
19.73±2.37c
|
C18 :0
|
2.76 ±0.66a
|
4.01±1.73b
|
7.15±3.45c
|
2.92 ±0.78a
|
4.57±0.73c
|
7.89±0.47c
|
3.19±0.78a
|
3.73±0.47b
|
6.37±1.51c*
|
4.22±0.96a***
|
4.27±0.36a
|
6.03±0.58c**
|
Total SFA
|
26.44±2.03a
|
33.97±3.12c
|
40.49±2.30c
|
29.00±3.41a**
|
34.42±3.27b
|
44.19±3.06c***
|
29.2±2.10a**
|
30.98±2.92a
|
40.67±2.94c
|
32.84±2.10a***
|
34.57±3.41a
|
38.78±3.07b
|
C16 :1n-7
|
6.75 ±1.51a
|
8.80±1.55a
|
9.984±2.47c
|
7.82 ±1.51a*
|
9.41±1.59b*
|
12.06±3.02c**
|
6.40±0.46a
|
7.37±1.42b
|
10.12±1.21c
|
5.92±0.47a*
|
6.68±1.25b**
|
9.42±1.36c
|
C18 :1n-9
|
12.23±2.40a
|
15.40±2.05a
|
17.95±3.22b
|
12.85±2.74a
|
13.78±2.02b*
|
16.08±0.87c*
|
13.53±1.13a
|
14.31±3.05b
|
17.31±2.87c
|
12.68±1.41a
|
13.57±2.42b*
|
19.52±2.31c**
|
C18 :1n-7
|
2.90±0.50a
|
4.25±0.58b
|
5.12±2.72c
|
3.51±0.78a*
|
4.12±0.68b
|
6.43 ±0.18c*
|
3.81±0.27a*
|
4.21±0.72b
|
6.87±1.36c*
|
3.36±0.27a
|
3.86±0.58a*
|
4.11±1.27b
|
Total MUFA
|
24.77±2.05a
|
33.23±2.56b
|
40.47±3.67c
|
27.54±2.31a**
|
31.32±3.73b*
|
39.69±2.73c
|
26.72±1.58a*
|
29.70±3.41b*
|
40.03±3.21c
|
24.98±1.23a
|
27.65±2.73b**
|
34.85±3.14c***
|
C18 :2n-6
|
4.68±0.97a
|
5.40±1.96b
|
7.32±1.51b
|
5.69±0.82a*
|
3.78±1.25b***
|
3.02±1.78b***
|
6.32±2.48a**
|
4.92±1.63b
|
3.96±0.69c***
|
7.01±1.57a***
|
5.36±0.44b
|
4.00±0.73c***
|
C20 :4n-6 (ARA)
|
11.24±2.35a
|
12.23±2.65b
|
13.05±2.29c
|
12.44±7.78a
|
11.22±2.42b*
|
11.23±1.65a*
|
9.98±1.75a*
|
7.78±1.57b**
|
9.52±1.38a***
|
10.02±1.41a
|
9.08±1.36b***
|
7.14±0.68c***
|
C20 :5n-3 (EPA)
|
7.93 ±1.46a
|
3.49±0.51b
|
1.22±0.54c
|
8.57 ±1.33a*
|
4.98±1.94b*
|
1.74±2.31a
|
5.67±0.36a**
|
3.98±1.72b
|
3.21±0.42a***
|
6.41±0.51a*
|
5.31±0.87b**
|
4.12±0.35c***
|
C22 :5n-3
|
1.78±0.23a
|
1.27±0.72a
|
0.78±0.06b
|
2.42±0.27a**
|
1.63±0.12a
|
1.02±0,05a
|
1.31±0.68a
|
0.97±0.09b
|
0.98±0.08b
|
1.76±0.21a
|
1.36±0,01a
|
1.02±0.04b
|
C22 :6n-3 (DHA)
|
13.68±2.78a
|
8.78±2.86b
|
1.67±0.57c
|
12.63±2.56a*
|
8.46±1.41b
|
6.98±2.97c***
|
14.85±2.35a*
|
10.37±1.52b**
|
7.21±0.33c***
|
13.78±2.27a
|
12.21±1.41b***
|
9.42±0.84c***
|
PUFA n-3
|
23.39±1.15a
|
13.54±1.09c
|
3.67±0.08c
|
23.62±3.06a
|
15.07±0.76c**
|
9.74±0.63c***
|
21.83±2.58a*
|
15.32±2.13c**
|
11.40±1.30c***
|
21.95±1.61a*
|
18.88±1.24b***
|
14.56±2.33c***
|
PUFA n-6
|
15.92±1.22a
|
17.63±1.11b
|
20.37±1.98c
|
18.12±0.97a**
|
15.00±1.35a*
|
14.25±1.53b***
|
16.30±1.00a
|
12.70±1.18b**
|
13.48±1.27b***
|
17.03±1.22a*
|
14.44±1.37b**
|
11.14±0.51c***
|
Total PUFA
|
42.33±1.32a
|
32.69±2.78b
|
24.09±2.09c
|
45.77±3.02a*
|
33.32±2.78b
|
25.34±3.12c
|
37.86±3.12a***
|
31.99±3.12b
|
26.04±3.07c*
|
43.05±4.08a
|
37.79±2.44b*
|
27.79±3.51b*
|
Results are illustrated as mean ± SD
Difference between FF and CSF conditions are presented at 5% (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).
Difference between the storage days are presented by a < 0.05, b < 0.01 and c < 0.001.
Fatty acid composition in fresh and hot smokedS. luciopercafillets
Comparing fatty acid composition of hot smoked and fresh S. lucioperca was given in Table 2. Results showed that in hot smoked fillets, PUFA were by far the major FA class (between22-46% of total FA) followed by SFA and MUFA that ranged from 28 to 44% and from 27 to 41% respectively. Comparing the fresh and hot smoked fillets, our data revealed significant increases of SFA, MUFA and PUFA mainly during the first day of storage (p < 0.01). Similarly, PUFA n-3 was the major PUFA group and mainly represented by EPA and DHA that showing significant increases by ≥ 1.5-fold up when compared with the fresh fillets. Additionally, PUFA n-6 showed a significant enhancement in hot smoked fillets after 1 day of storage by 25% as compared to the long term storage showing statistical decreases of PUFA n-6 mainly ARA (p < 0.01). Overall, there was a tendency for significant decreases of SFA and MUFA against the increases of PUFA for mixed zander with + 0.5pp and + 1pp of D. salina in comparison to fresh one (p < 0.05).Significant differences were observed for some particular PUFA n-3 as EPA, and DHA acids, showing a statistical increase in zander fillets mixed with + 0.5pp and + 1pp after 20 and 90days of storage when comparing to the fresh ones (p < 0.01). Furthermore, C18:2n-6 the major PUFA n-6 acid tended to increase during the two first storage period (p < 0.01) and decreased significantly after long term storage period by 69% and 21% for fillets mixed with + 0.5pp and + 1pp of D. salina respectively when compared to the fresh one. Concerning the ARA, its amount remained statistically invariable during one and twenty days of storage compared to the fresh fillets, however, significant reductions were observed after 90 days in both storage fillets with graded D. salina.
Lipid peroxidation indices in fresh and smokedS. luciopercafillets
Lipid peroxidation indices comprising PV, TBARS and FFA measured in fresh and smoked S.lucioperca fillets are presented in Fig. 2 (A.B and C). According to our results, significant changes were noted among the studied period and in function of smoking conditions. When comparing fresh fillets among the studied storage period, we observed that PV, TBARS and FFA increased significantly after 20 (p < 0.01) and 90 (p < 0.001) days. Similar variations were reported for cold smoking ad hot smoking fillets as evidence by statistical augmentation of these peroxidation indices mainly after 90 days of storage when comparing to the fresh fillets (p < 0.001).
Additionally, differences between fresh fillets and smoking were recorded showing that these two processes decreased significantly the levels of lipid peroxidation indices (p < 0.05). Also, the addition of + 0.5pp and + 1pp of D. salina in the smoked fillets have significant effect after 20 and 90days of storage showing decreases of PV, TBARS and FFA levels as compared to the fresh fillets (p < 0.01).
Table 2
Fatty acid composition of fresh (FF) and hold smoked (HSF) Sander lucioperca with Dunaliella salina as natural antioxidant at different concentrations (+ 0.5pp and + 1pp).
FA
|
FF
|
HSF
|
HSF + 0.5pp
|
HSF + 1pp
|
1 day
|
20 days
|
90 days
|
1 day
|
20 days
|
90 days
|
1 day
|
20 days
|
90 days
|
1 day
|
20 days
|
90 days
|
C14 :0
|
4.65±0.19a
|
5.09±1.12a
|
6.14±1.78b
|
5.28±0.63a*
|
6.92±1.51b*
|
9.01±1.44c***
|
4.69±0.51a
|
5.08±1.03b
|
6.27±1.07c
|
4.73±0.27a
|
5.27±1.22b
|
6.55±1.43b**
|
C16 :0
|
16.40 ±0.89a
|
20.46±1.52b
|
22.19±2.5c
|
16.98±3.08a
|
17.86±2.44b**
|
22.18±1.55c
|
15.21±2.45a*
|
16.12±2.76b***
|
20.36±1.28c**
|
15.39±2.64a*
|
15.68±2.31a***
|
18.61±1.59b***
|
C18 :0
|
2.76 ±0.66a
|
4.01±1.73b
|
7.15±3.45c
|
3.26±0.92a
|
4.13±0.87b
|
7.41±0.51c
|
3.12±0.84a
|
4.01±0.56a
|
6.81±0.36c
|
3.58±0.72a
|
3.78±0.56a*
|
5.62±0.36b**
|
Total SFA
|
26.44±2.03a
|
33.97±3.12c
|
40.49±2.30c
|
28.66±3.24a**
|
32.90±3.15b
|
44.61±4.05c***
|
26.05±2.54a
|
28.97±2.69b**
|
38.66±3.12c**
|
26.94±3.35a
|
28.29±2.56b**
|
35.58±2.86c***
|
C16 :1n-7
|
6.75 ±1.51a
|
8.80±1.55a
|
9.984±2.47c
|
8.43±1.26a**
|
8.78±1.21a
|
13.76±2.58c**
|
7.21±0.96a
|
7.92±1.26a
|
11.32±2.37c*
|
7.44±0.82a
|
7.66±1.41a
|
9.78±2.57b
|
C18 :1n-9
|
12.23±2.40a
|
15.40±2.05a
|
17.95±3.22b
|
11.46±2.52a
|
12.02±2.15b
|
17.45±2.41c
|
10.23±1.78a
|
11.12±2.27b
|
14.36±2.28c
|
10.51±1.45a
|
10.77±2.31b
|
11.90±2.45b
|
C18 :1n-7
|
2.90±0.50a
|
4.25±0.58b
|
5.12±2.72c
|
4.36±0.89a***
|
4.99±0.38b
|
7.16±0.23c**
|
3.78±0.27a*
|
4.97±0.12b
|
6.46 ±0.47c
|
3.97±0.68a*
|
4.37±0.12b
|
5.86±0.47b
|
Total MUFA
|
24.77±2.05a
|
33.23±2.56b
|
40.47±3.67c
|
27.49±2.72a**
|
29.73±4.21b
|
41.75±2.86c
|
24.34±2.15a
|
27.59±2.76b**
|
36.26±3.12c***
|
25.37±2.68a
|
26.52±2.39b**
|
31.59±3.28b***
|
C18 :2n-6
|
4.68±0.97a
|
5.40±1.96b
|
7.32±1.51b
|
6.21±0.74a***
|
4.21±1.13a
|
2.27±0.14b***
|
7.04±0.66a***
|
6.54±0.76a*
|
4.31±0.21b***
|
7.01±0.66a***
|
6.81±0.15a**
|
6.01±0.18b**
|
C20 :4n-6 (ARA)
|
11.24±2.35a
|
12.23±2.65b
|
13.05±2.29c
|
13.25±2.31a**
|
12.08±1.31b
|
8.97±1.13a***
|
11.78±2.58a
|
11.12±1.26a
|
7.33±1.09c***
|
11.66±2.45a
|
11.36±1.13a
|
10.16±1.19c**
|
C20 :5n-3 (EPA)
|
7.93 ±1.46a
|
3.49±0.51b
|
1.22±0.54c
|
7.12±1.15a
|
5.96±1.26b**
|
1.21±0.27c
|
7.68±1.08a
|
6.96±1.37b***
|
4.95±0.83c***
|
7.51±1.11a
|
7.38±1.78b***
|
6.06±0.27c***
|
C22 :5n-3
|
1.78±0.23a
|
1.27±0.72a
|
0.78±0.06b
|
2.51±0.14a**
|
2.04±0.17a*
|
1.02±0.01b
|
3.07±0.27a**
|
2.47±0.24a**
|
1.64±0.03b*
|
3.05±0.13a**
|
2.81±0.51a**
|
2.51±0.15b***
|
C22 :6n-3 (DHA)
|
13.68±2.78a
|
8.78±2.86b
|
1.67±0.57c
|
12.41±2.22a
|
11.09±1.28b***
|
6.14±2.37c***
|
13.61±2.52a
|
12.79±1.09b***
|
9.26±1.99c***
|
13.87±2.42a
|
13.16±1.28b***
|
12.65±1.37c***
|
PUFA n-3
|
23.39±1.15a
|
13.54±1.09c
|
3.67±0.08c
|
22.06±1.14a
|
19.11±1.67b***
|
8.37±0.78c***
|
24.37±2.08a*
|
22.23±1.53b***
|
15.86±1.47c***
|
24.43±2.69a*
|
23.35±1.31a***
|
21.23±1.70b
|
PUFA n-6
|
15.92±1.22a
|
17.63±1.11b
|
20.37±1.98c
|
19.46±1.42a**
|
16.31±1.27b*
|
11.25±0.99c***
|
18.83±1.66a**
|
17.67±2.04a
|
11.64±1.38c***
|
18.67±0.76a**
|
18.17±1.28a*
|
16.18±1.54b***
|
Total PUFA
|
42.33±1.32a
|
32.69±2.78b
|
24.09±2.09c
|
46.71±4.31a**
|
40.05±3.51b**
|
22.29±2.05c
|
49.29±4.57a***
|
45.80±2.48b***
|
32.19±2.24c***
|
49.37±3.34a***
|
49.17±4.97b***
|
40.89±2.51c***
|
Results are illustrated as mean ± SD
Difference between FF and HSF conditions are presented at 5% (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).
Difference between the storage days are presented by a < 0.05, b < 0.01 and c < 0.001.
Free radical (DPPH) activities in fresh and smoked S. lucioperca fillets
DPPH activities in fresh and smoked S. lucioperca fillers were reported in Fig. 3. Our results showed inhibition of the DPPH activities during 20 and 90 days when compared to the first day of storage in fresh and all smoked fillets (p < 0.001). The important inhibition was recorded after 90 days of storage mainly in cold smoked and hot smoked fillets (p < 0.001). Thus, the results show a positive correlation between the percentage of addition and the antioxidant activity, which proves the effect of polyphenyol on the antioxidant activity.
Because of the large number of nutrients, including protein, long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs), vitamins and minerals, fishes are widely considered as a healthy and balanced diet for dietary uptake. According to the World Health Organization guidelines, it is recommended that fish is consumed two to three times a week in order to prevent life style diseases [10].
Nevertheless, fish is highly perishable since it is extremely vulnerable to oxidation resulting in the development of off-odor and -flavor and subsequent spoilage development [11]. Thus, it is of need to develop or improve preservation and processing techniques to keep a high quality of aquatic products when marketing. The smoking process and the use of D. salina extract can be solution to extend shelf life of fishes.
The increases in proteins and lipids after both cold and hot smoking could be explained by the water loss associated to the evaporation during this mechanism. These data are in line with those of [12]. On the other hand, our experiment showed that proteins amounts remained stable in fresh and in cold smoked fillets during the storage period. Therefore protein in hot smoked fillets decreased after 20 and 90 days of storages. This last finding is mainly due to the autolytic enzymes activities causing spoilage [13]. This decrease in protein, associated with the storage time, could be also explained by the microbial spoilage [14].
Our results revealed decreases of lipids in fresh and smoked fillets after 20 and 90 days of storages. This finding could be attributed to hydrolysis of some lipid fractions [15].
In addition Dunaliella salina increases of the amounts of lipids in cold and hot smoked fillets.
D. salina is a rich source of polyphenols, which have very interesting antioxidant properties. This secondary metabolite could stop lipid degradation of this kind of fish fillets, by eliminating free radicals [16].
Also we evaluated the TVBN which is considered as an important parameter allowing us to evaluate the quality of fish product. Our results demonstrated that the TVBN increases progressively and significantly in fresh and smoked fillets after 20 days and remaining highly after 90 days of storage. Our study is in agreement with the work of [17] who finds that TVBN increased gradually during the period of storage of smoke fish. This may be due to continuous degradation of protein to total volatile base nitrogen. Smoking decreased the amounts of TVBN. In this respect, we must keep in mind that production of dimethylamine, trimethylamine and ammonia is associated to destructive effect of microorganisms and is considered as TVBN [18]. Due to the effect of smoking and D. salina on microorganisms, this combined process lead to decreasing TVBN.
We observed that PV, TBARS and FFA increased after 20 and 90 days of storage. Both cold and hot smoking processes decreased these three parameters. Alternatively, polyphenols of D. salina which is an interesting antioxidant which decreases PV, TBARS and FFA content in smoked (cold and hot) fish fillet. It delays oxidation of lipid due to its polyphenols content. These data are in line with those of [19] which find that Dunaliella salina inhibit lipid oxidation since the first month of storage.
DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate) activity was widely used as an easy way for evaluating antioxidant properties. 90 days of storage in cold smoked group had the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity. The most previous research works deals the smoking treatments as an efficient process for preserving; however, at our knowledge none had studied its antioxidant activity. In this context, smoked fish was noticed to be resistant to oxidative rancidity. Smoking fish generate phenols which has a high antioxidant activity. Difference in phenols content between traditional and non-traditional methods, were not significant. Therefore temperature affected phenols level. So cold smoked fish content more antioxidants and this explained the improvement in DPPH. Whereas, at concentrations below 1 pp of Dunaliella salina polyphenols extract, no improvement was detected (compared to 0,5pp and to control groups) in DPPH activity.
The effect of adding microalgae was shown by [20] when he added 3 species of microalgae in the ingredients of fish burger and showed a positive correlation between the quantity of added microalgae and the activity antioxidant and has also shown that this activity depends on the species of microalgae which have different contents and physico-chemical properties of pigments. The high concentrations of oxygen and light, can cause structural damage to living organisms through the oxidative effect, but this is not the case for microalgae because they are able to protect themselves against this situation by the production of enzymatic antioxidants and not enzymatic. Indeed, microalgae are rich in natural pigments capable of improve the efficiency of the light energy used by microalgae and protect them against solar radiation and related effects.
Overall, fresh S. lucioperca represented a fatty acid profile dominated by the PUFA similar to that of other freshwater species namely Lates niloticus, Mormyrops deliciosus and Hydrocynus forkahlii. The major identified SFA and MUFA were respectively palmitic acid (C16:0) and oleic acid (C18:1n-9) which is in accordance with other studies on aquatic species [2]. In addition, freshwater fish meat is known to contain high levels of MUFA especially oleic acid, which plays significant role in human health [21].
The SFA contents increased significantly after the smoking process for all the tested storage periods and this was closely related to the increases of C14:0, C16:0 and C18:0, which were higher than those of fresh zander fish [1]. The same for most MUFA and PUFA, which was mainly due to water loss by evaporation during both hot and cold smoking [1].
However, the significant decreases in MUFA and PUFA contents can be explained by their oxidation during the smoking process and the storage.
Essential fatty acids namely EPA and DHA are necessary for human well-being, in fact, the American Heart Association recommends taking 500 mg of EPA and DHA per day. Omega-3 acids prevent heart disease and have anti-atherosclerotic effect. They have been proven to reduce mortality of patients with coronary artery disease [22].
In this study, results revealed that (EPA + DHA) contents in both cold and hot smoked zander fish can meet the daily requirements.
Despite their benefits, hot smoked processed products can lead to excessive shrinkage which may decrease the yield and the nutritive value of fish [23]. So, the optimization of time and temperature in smoking process technology is extremely important to ensure a good quality product during storage. For this, natural extracts can be used to reduce the smoking scale time/temperature.
In this study, we hypothesized that the combination of smoking treatment and D. salina extract incorporation on fish fillets could provide a more nutritive final product.
In fact, results showed that it reduced significantly both SFA and MUFA contents and increased polyunsaturated fatty acids and mainly omega-3 and omega-6 (p < 0.05).
Since antioxidants play an important role in food technology due to their usefulness against lipid oxidation, the interest in finding natural sources of antioxidants is increasing and the search for new natural sources is also becoming more important. Nowadays, there is a huge interest in the potential use of marine natural sources to obtain bioactive substances and D. salina extracts seems to be an effective natural antioxidant.
This microalgae is known to have antioxidant effect since it contains high amounts of polyphenols and β-carotene [24]. Some studies compared the free radical scavenging effect of algal extracts of D. salina with some commercially carotenoids and showed that the algal extract showed higher activity than industrial carotenoids [25].
Thus, we can conclude that due to its beneficial fatty acid composition and antioxidant properties, D. salina can be a safe food additive and can be used in food industry due to its functional activities. It can be also used as a new source of essential fatty acids.
The comparison of hot and cold smoking process of fish fillet shows that the hot process is more appropriate because of the higher essential fatty acids level. It should also be noted that the hot smoking process is faster than the cold process.