Liver disease caused by HBV infection has resulted in a huge disease burden worldwide, and CHB infection is particularly prevalent in Asia, specifically in China[22–25]. In 2016, the WHO approved the first global health sector strategy for viral hepatitis, with the goal of eliminating viral hepatitis as a major public health threat by 2030 (reducing new infections by 90% and mortality by 65%)[23].
This study shows that the notification rate for new hepatitis B cases in Guangzhou decreased from 158.78 per 100,000 in 2006 to 141.73 per 100,000 in 2020, with an average annual decrease of 1.27%. Although the overall decreasing trend was not statistically significant, joinpoint regression analysis showed that the notification rate showed a short sharp increase from 2006 to 2008, followed by a long-term decrease at an average annual rate of 7.55% from 2008 to 2018 with a statistical significance, and a random fluctuation from 2018 to 2020. The period of rising notification rate from 2006 to 2008 may be because the CISDCP system completed in 2004 was still in the early stage of construction, and the functions of the system and the reporting requirements for medical institutions were not yet perfect. A similar situation emerged when Wang et al. used data from the CISDCP system to analyse the trends in notification and mortality of tuberculosis in China from 2004 to 2019[26]. After 2008, there was a long-term downward trend in the notification rate of hepatitis B in Guangzhou, which can probably be attributed to a series of interventions and the introduction of relevant policies by the Chinese government. The Chinese government has made great efforts to prevent HBV infection. In 1992, a recombinant vaccine was licensed and introduced nationwide for a fee, requiring one dose of hepatitis B vaccine for all births and two additional doses during infancy, with the goal of interrupting perinatal HBV transmission and providing lifelong HBV protection for new-borns. In 2002, China included the hepatitis B vaccine in its Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI), vaccinating free of cost for children aged under 14 years. In addition, from 2009 to 2011, a catch-up campaign was launched for children younger than 15 years, which succeeded in vaccinating nearly 68 million children[25, 27]. With the unremitting efforts of the government and although the notification rate of hepatitis B in Guangzhou has decreased significantly, the rate of 141.73 per 100,000 in 2020 is still significantly higher than some developed western countries, such as the United States, the European Union (EU) countries[28, 29], and Asian countries, including Japan and South Korea[30, 31], and also higher than the national average of 69.05 per 100,000 in 2014[32]. Guangzhou is still under tremendous pressure to achieve the 2030 target set by the WHO.
This study shows a long-term decreasing trend in the notification rates in both gender from 2008 (except for females from 2018 to 2020), except for an increasing trend from 2006 to 2008, possibly because of CISDCP system imperfections. The prevalence is significantly higher in males than in females, although this gender difference has decreased from 2.53 times in 2006 to 1.54 times in 2020, which is consistent with the reports from EU/European Economic Area countries in 2018[29]. The reasons for observing this trend are as follows: studies have shown that the variant oestrogen receptors were expressed more in male than in female HCC patients, leading to speculation that oestrogen may play a role in the protection and defence against HBV infection[33]; secondly, China has implemented universal free mandatory hepatitis B vaccination, thus generating universal resistance in both men and women, which further reduced the gender difference in HBV infection rates.
In addition, this study also found that, except for a significant increase in the notification rate of hepatitis B in both urban and rural areas from 2006 to 2008, which may be because of CISDCP system imperfections, the notification rate in urban areas has been declining at an average annual rate of 7.72% since 2008. However, rural areas showed a brief decline from 2008 to 2012, after which it began to increase at an annual rate of 6.71%. The decline in urban morbidity may be attributed to the benefits of a series of government interventions and policies, such as the EPI, vaccine catch-up campaign, etc. The long-term upward trend in rural areas since 2012 may be attributed to the increasing degree of urban-rural integration with the development of China's economy, which has significantly improved the level of medical care, medical resources, and the convenience of medical care for residents in rural areas; and the gradually increasing living standards, literacy, and awareness of medical care among rural residents. The combination of these factors has contributed to the increase in the diagnostic rate of hepatitis B in rural areas and the rate of medical consultation among the residents, ultimately leading to a yearly increase in the notification rate of hepatitis B. The notification rate of hepatitis B in rural areas exceeded that in urban areas for the first time in 2017, and the gap widened year by year, reaching 1.57 times the rate in urban areas by 2020, which is inconsistent with the significantly higher incidence of acute hepatitis B in urban areas than in rural areas reported in Poland and Norway[34, 35]. Possible explanations are that the incidence of hepatitis B in these countries is low and many of the new cases are immigrants, who mostly live in urban areas[35, 36].
There was an overall decreasing trend in the ≤ 9 years and 10–19 years age groups, and a decreasing trend after 2008 in the 20–59 years age group, except for a spike in the incidence from 2006 to 2008, possibly because of CISDCP system imperfections. This may be primarily due to China's vaccination policy and the improvement of medical care, which effectively blocked mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B. In the group aged ≥ 60 years, after a plateau period from 2008 to 2015, the notification rate of hepatitis B began to decline year by year, for which we cannot give a scientific explanation, and further studies are needed.
Our analysis had several strengths. First, with the continuous improvement of the CISDCP system and the increasingly standardized implementation of infectious disease reporting requirements by medical institutions, the CISDCP system includes almost all new cases of hepatitis B. A study showed that the overall underreporting rate of infectious diseases in Guangzhou is 1.17%, and the total underreporting rate of infectious diseases of category B to which hepatitis B belongs is 0.36%, which would be even lower if only the incidence of hepatitis B is calculated[37]. Second, we included up to 15 years of data in the analysis, which will greatly increase our ability to detect trends in change, and the results will be more consistent. The study also has several limitations. First, from 2006 to 2008, the notification rate for HBV infection showed a sharp increase, which we speculate to be an artefact caused by the inaccuracy of data at the early stage of the system rather than a real trend of change. Second, although the underreporting rate of the CISDCP system was low, the consultation rate of hepatitis B patients was not available. It can be speculated from the yearly increased notification rate in rural areas that there may still be numerous undiagnosed patients without symptoms in rural areas and that the new incidence of hepatitis B may actually be much higher than the notification of this study.