3.1. Characterization of the complexes
3.1.1. FT-IR study
The FT-IR spectra of the investigated azo-ligands and their complexes were studied to characterize the mode of bonding between the metal ion and the ligand (Table S1 and Figs. 1, S2). The IR spectrum of the HL1 free ligand exhibited bands at 3462, 1622, 1499, 1449, 1321 and 1208 cm− 1, which are assigned to νOH, νC=C, νC−C, νN=N, νC−N and νC−O vibrational modes, respectively [23]. The characteristic infrared spectral band of HL1 complexes (Fig. S2) showed a remarkable change in the intensity and slight shift in the position of νN=N bands upon complexation. Besides, the disappearance of the νOH bands in the IR spectrum of the complexes (Fig. S2) suggests the deprotonation of the phenolic OH group. Noteworthy, the broadband appeared in the region > 3300 cm− 1 in the IR spectrum of the HL1 complexes could be attributed to the water of crystallization which is approved later by thermal analysis. Accordingly, HL1 behaves as a bidentate ligand, coordinating via the oxygen atom of the OH group in the naphthalene moiety after a loss of proton and the lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen of the azo group forming a stable six-membered ring. This mode of coordination is supported by the disappearance or lowering in the intensity of the bands due to bonded OH group [24] and the stretching frequency of the azo-group with the simultaneous appearance of new bands in the frequency ranges 608 − 557 cm− 1 and 497 − 371 cm− 1 of νM−O and νM−N, respectively [25].
Likewise, the characteristic νOH band at 3468 cm− 1 for the free ligand HL2 was slightly shifted in all complexes (Table S1 and Fig. 1) indicating the involvement of the OH group in the complex formation without deprotonation. The νC−O band at 1390 cm− 1 in the free ligand exhibited a considerable change in the position and intensity upon complexation indicating the contribution of the carboxylic oxygen in the complex formation [26]. Additionally, the bands due to the scissoring and wagging of the carboxylate group in the range 900 − 600 cm− 1 displayed noticeable changes in their intensities [27]. The band at 1495 cm− 1 of the free ligand spectrum is due to νN=N group in an azobenzene-like structure in a trans configuration [28]. The νN=N band is nearly unaffected through complexation which rules out the participation of the azo group in the chelation. The asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the carboxylate group at 1540 and 1410 cm− 1 respectively [29], appeared clearly in all HL2-complexes, implying the involvement of this group in the chelation moiety. Hence, all HL2-complexes are neutral, where the charge on the central metal ion is balanced by binding to the COO− groups of the coordinated ligands (Fig. 1).
3.1.2. UV-Vis, MS and magnetic susceptibility studies
The UV-Vis. spectrum of the HL1-metal complexes showed three electronic absorption bands at 268, 308–320, 370–478 nm in DMF (Table 1 & Figs. S3-S6). The band at 268 nm is attributed to π→π∗ resulted from the interaction of π-electrons in the conjugated system. Also, the bands in the range 308–320 nm are assigned to n→π∗ developed from the non-bonding electrons on the azo group. However, the intense broad bands in the range 370–478 nm are due to the charge transfer (CT). The room temperature value of µeff of [Ni(L1)2].H2O is zero. This diamagnetic behavior indicates the square planar environment around Ni(II) ion of low-spin type. Moreover, the electronic spectral band at 478 nm of the Cu-HL1 complex, [Cu(L1)2].H2O, could be assigned to 2B1g→2B2g electronic transition which is concealed by the broad CT transition. Besides, the µeff values of 1.85 B.M for [Cu(L1)2].H2O and 2.65 B.M for [Co(L1)2].H2O (Fig. 2) typified the existence of square planar geometry [30, 31].
Furthermore, the electronic absorption spectra of HL2 complexes in DMF, [Fe(HL2)3].H2O, [Co(HL2)2(H2O)2].H2O, [Ni(HL2)2(H2O)2].4H2O and [Cu(HL2)2].2H2O, exhibited different bands, (Table 1). Similarly, the bands at 268–270 nm for these complexes are assigned to π→π∗ transition whereas the bands at higher wavelength, 392–396 nm, are attributed to CT from ligand to metal. The broadness of the CT band obscured the possible d-d transitions of the complexes as 3A2g → 3T1g (P) in the case of Ni (II) in an octahedral field that lies within the same spectral region. The room temperature µeff (Table 1) characterizes the octahedral geometry for all HL2 complexes except [Cu(HL2)2].2H2O complex which has µeff = 1.77 B.M. of square-planar D2h symmetry [30]. Based on the FT-IR, electronic spectra, and magnetic susceptibility, HL2 is verified to have a bidentate nature which binds to the metal ion through two oxygen atoms of OH and the COO¯ groups. The proposed structures of the isolated complexes from the reaction of sodium salt of alizarin yellow GG with metal chloride are given in Fig. 3.
The mass spectral data of the synthesized complexes are collected in Figs. 4 and S7-S12. The molecular ion peaks (M+•) of the synthesized complexes are consistent with their proposed formula. For example, the mass spectrum of [Cu(L1)2].H2O displayed a molecular ion peak at m/z 576.14. The spectrum displayed other peaks at m/z 558.54, 170.29, 154.95 and 77.67 corresponding to the cationic fragments [Cu(L1)2]+, C10H6N2O2+, C10H6N2+ and C6H5+ respectively. Also, the molecular ion peak of [Cu(HL2)2].2H2O complex at m/z 672.05 supports its proposed structure. Moreover, the base peaks of [Cu(L1)2].H2O and [Cu(HL2)2].2H2O complexes with 100% abundance at m/z 126.92 and 286.68 could be assigned to the formula weight of naphthalene and HL2 cations, respectively, (Figs. 4 and S7). Noteworthy, the mass spectra of other complexes are in excellent agreement with their elemental analyses
Table 1 Elemental analysis data, metal content, magnetic moment, (λmax, nm) values and the proposed geometries of the synthesized metal azo-ligand complexes.
Complex*
|
Formula
Mwt.
|
% Calculated / (Found)
|
µeff
B.M
|
λmax
|
Geometry
|
M
|
C
|
H
|
N
|
[Co(L1)2].H2O
|
C32H24N4O3Co
571.49
|
10.31
(10.12)
|
67.25
(67.49)
|
4.23
(4.48)
|
9.80
(9.67)
|
2.65
|
268, 320, 370
|
Square planar
|
[Ni(L1)2].H2O
|
C32H24N4O3Ni
571.25
|
10.27
(10.52)
|
67.28
(67.43)
|
4.23
(4.42)
|
9.81
(9.85)
|
dia.
|
268, 312, 478
|
Square planar
|
[Cu(L1)2].H2O
|
C32H24N4O3Cu
576.10
|
11.03
(11.12)
|
66.71
(66.43)
|
4.20
(4.51)
|
9.73
(9.95)
|
1.85
|
268, 308, 478
|
Square planar
|
[Fe(HL2)3].H2O
|
C39H26N9O16Fe
932.52
|
5.99
(5.69)
|
50.23
(50.06)
|
2.81
(2.64)
|
13.52
(13.67)
|
5.93
|
230, 268, 396
|
Octahedral
|
[Co(HL2)2(H2O)2].H2O
|
C26H22N6O13Co
685.42
|
8.60
(8.87)
|
45.56
(45.80)
|
3.24
(3.53)
|
12.26
(11.97)
|
4.85
|
268, 392
|
Octahedral
|
[Ni(HL2)2(H2O)2].4H2O
|
C26H28N6O16Ni
739.22
|
7.94
(8.05)
|
42.24
(42.11)
|
3.82
(3.66)
|
11.37
(11.12)
|
2.97
|
268, 392
|
Octahedral
|
[Cu(HL2)2].2H2O
|
C26H20N6O12Cu
672.02
|
9.46
(9.70)
|
46.47
(46.22)
|
3.00
(3.27)
|
12.51
(12.37)
|
1.77
|
270, 392
|
Square planar
|
* All complexes are of melting points > 300 ºC |
3.1.3. ESR of Copper (II) Complexes
The room temperature X-band powdered electronic spin resonance of the square planar [Cu(L1)2].H2O derived from HL1 (Fig. 5) showed anisotropic spectrum of rhombic type [32]. The g-values are g1 = 2.639, g2 = 1.788 and g3 = 1.741. The < g > value is equal to 2.056. Here, the deviation of the < g > value from the free electron 2.0032 could be due to the misalignment of local copper (II) environment and the probability of Cu-Cu ion exchange [30]. The R-parameter which is calculated by the relation R = (g2 - g1)/ (g3 - g2) equals to 18.11 (R > 1) implying that the ground state is dz2 [30]. However, the ESR spectra of the square planar [Cu(HL2)2] .2H2O complex derived from HL2 is of isotropic spectral pattern of dynamic or pseudo rotational type of Jahn-Teller distortion (Fig. 5) at giso= 1.85 with A = 333.33 × 10− 4 cm− 1. Isotropic spectrum is common for complexes containing misaligned "tetragonal" axes of magnetically dilute interaction [32]. The observed broadening of the resonance line suggests a heightened magnetic dipole interaction between the paramagnetic centers due to the polymeric nature of this complex [33].
3.1.4. Thermal analysis (TGA, DTA and DSC)
The TGA curves for the investigated azo-ligands and their complexes are collected in Figs. 6 & S13. The thermal decomposition pattern and assignment of the removed species are presented in Tables 2 & S2. A slight difference was discerned between the found and calculated mass percentage which points to the overlapping between some of the successive steps. This overlapping is further supported by the observed DTA peak temperature value, Tm, corresponding to each TGA step temperature range, (Tables 2 & S2). The TGA thermogram of HL1 complexes, [Co(L1)2].H2O, [Ni(L1)2].H2O and [Cu(L1)2].H2O specifies their thermal stability up to ∼200 ºC. The removal of water of crystallization from the complexes starts at low temperatures but extended to ∼ 189 ºC (Fig. S13). This may be attributed to a strong attachment of the outer sphere H2O to the coordination sphere through hydrogen bonds which delays its removal during the thermal decomposition [34].
Generally, the thermal decomposition routes of the complexes proceed in three main stages where the bond between the central metal ion and the ligands starts to dissociate after losing small molecules such as H2O, NO2 and CO2 (Tables 2 & S2). The thermal decomposition of the larger fragment of the ligand is noticed in the second stage which takes place in two steps as in [Fe(HL2)3].H2O or three successive steps as in [Ni(L1)2].H2O case, Fig. S13. The final stage is assigned to the liberation of the rest of the ligands as free radical species ended with metal oxide residue in most cases. Moreover, the formation of metal carbonate as a residue in the thermal decomposition of [Fe(HL2)3].H2O (Fig. 6 and Table 2) supports the bonding of the Fe(III) to the carboxylate group as indicated in the spectral data and similar reported complexes in literature [35].
Table 2 DTA and TGA analyses of HL2-metal complexes
Compounds
|
Type
|
Tm(ºC)
|
Temp. (ºC)
TGA
|
Wt. loss%
|
Removed species
|
Found
|
Calc.
|
[Fe(HL2)3].H2O
|
Exo
|
99.7
|
47.4-155.2
|
12.11
|
11.80
|
H2O, 2NO2
|
204.7-232.8
|
5.10
|
4.93
|
NO2
|
Exo
|
318.5
|
280.2-599.6
|
70.12
|
70.84
|
C38H24N6O6
|
|
|
|
Residue
|
12.67
|
12.42
|
FeCO3
|
[Co(HL2)2(H2O)2].H2O
|
Endo
|
small
|
63.6-158.7
|
7.51
|
7.89
|
3H2O
|
Endo
|
broad
|
239.5–327.0
|
20.57
|
19.84
|
2NO2, CO2
|
Exo
|
379.6
|
353.3-548.4
|
61.19
|
61.34
|
C25H16N4O3
|
|
|
|
Residue
|
10.73
|
10.93
|
CoO
|
[Ni(HL2)2(H2O)2].4H2O
|
Exo
|
88.7
|
34.8–161.0
|
11.86
|
12.19
|
5H2O
|
Exo
|
broad
|
229.4–325.0
|
21.07
|
20.84
|
H2O, 2NO2, CO2
|
Exo
|
355.7
|
325.0-430.3
|
56.99
|
56.87
|
C25H16N4O3
|
|
|
|
Residue
|
10.08
|
10.10
|
NiO
|
[Cu(HL2)2].2H2O
|
Exo
|
106.2
|
40.3-131.4
|
5.42
|
5.36
|
2H2O
|
220.4-333.5
|
20.17
|
20.24
|
2NO2, CO2
|
Exo
|
365.5
|
333.5-439.5
|
62.31
|
62.56
|
C25H16N4O3
|
|
|
|
Residue
|
12.10
|
11.84
|
CuO
|
The DTA curves for the entitled azo-ligands and some of their complexes are presented in Figs. 7 & S14-S17. The DTA Curve for Ni-HL1 complex, [Ni(L1)2].H2O (Fig. 7) exhibits an exothermic peak at 92.0 ºC corresponding to the dehydration of water molecule from the outer sphere of the complex. Two small exothermic steps are observed in the range 293.6-355.6 ºC assigned to the fragmentation of the phenyl groups. The last stage is accompanied by an exothermic peak at 430.3 ºC due to liberation of the naphthalene moieties of the ligand which is ended with the formation of NiO as a final product [36]. Also, the DTA curve for Fe-HL2 complex, [Fe(HL2)3].H2O (Fig. S14) exhibits an exothermic peak at 99.7 ºC corresponding to two TGA steps assigned to dehydration of one water molecule in the atmosphere of the complex, and the loss of 2 NO2. The last step appeared as exothermic peak at 318.5 ºC assigning the liberation of the rest of the ligand which ended with the formation of FeCO3. Further heating above 600 ºC would probably lead to metal oxide formation.
The DSC measurements for HL2 and its Ni-complex, [Ni(HL2)2(H2O)2].4H2O, were carried out under a flow of N2 at a heating rate of 10 ºC min− 1 in the temperature range 25–200 ºC. Apparently, both HL2 and its Ni-complex exhibited distinct transitions from glassy disordered to more ordered crystalline solid phase. HL2 displayed a glass transition temperature, Tg, at 57 ºC (Fig. 8). This temperature represents the change in the heat capacity of the disordered solid without exhibiting any phase transition. However, [Ni(HL2)2(H2O)2].4H2O complex showed a higher glass transition temperature, Tg = 85 ºC, than the free ligand owing to the decrease in the free space of the complex as a result of coordination to the metal ion [37]. The crystallization temperature, Tc, which is indicative of the transition from disordered to crystalline solid, appeared at 135 and 149 ºC for HL2 and its Ni-complex respectively. The melting process of the investigated compounds was not discerned within the studied temperature range (25–200 ºC). The melting temperatures are 274 ºC for HL2 and > 300 ºC for the Ni-complex as measured experimentally by Fisher-Johns melting-point apparatus. The elevated melting point values further support the thermal stability of the synthesized complexes up to at least 300 ºC (Tables 1 and 2).
3.2. Computational analysis
Optimization of the geometrical structures of all studied compounds to their minimum energy values was achieved using the density functional theory (DFT) method of calculation with B3LYP/6-31G basis sets. Electrophilic and nucleophilic regions on the ligand’s surfaces were evaluated aiming to investigate the optimal binding sites for the interactions with metal ions that were proposed experimentally in this contribution. Also, the stability of the square planar and octahedral geometries of complexes was examined by DFT calculations without enforcing symmetry around the metal centers. The yielded data are displayed in Tables 3, S3-S5, Figs. 9–11 &. S18-S22.
3.2.1. Molecular geometry and electronic parameters
The optimization of geometries of HL1, HL2 and their metal complexes by DFT calculation provided different possible conformers with diverse bond angles and bond lengths. The most stable conformers, i.e. the ones with the minimum structural energy, are given in Figs. 9 & S18-S20. The bond lengths of the functional groups of the optimized structure of HL1 are stated in Table S3 as a representative example. Noticeably, the sites of coordination of HL1 with the metal ion in [Cu(L1)2].H2O complex (Table S4) exhibited slight elongation in the bond length relative to the free HL1 (Table S3) as presented in Fig. 9. Besides, Cu(II) in [Cu(L1)2].H2O complex is coordinated to N(20) and N(50) of the azo groups with an average Cu(1)-N bond length of 1.94 Å and O(19) and O(49) with a Cu(1)-O bond length of 1.85 Å. The bond angles in the coordination sphere around Cu(II) are 95.73º and 92.33º for N(20)-Cu(1)-O(49) and N(50)-Cu(1)-O(49) respectively (Table S4). This finding points to the square planar geometry around Cu(II) center, with a small discrepancy of 2–5º from the ideal square planar angles (90º) probably due to the bulkiness of the ligand structure [38, 39]. Moreover, the molecular properties of the studied compounds such as the energies of the highest occupied (EHOMO) and the lowest unoccupied (ELUMO) molecular orbitals (Figs. 10 and S21) as well as the chemical reactivity parameters; electronegativity (χ), electrochemical potential (µ), global hardness (η), softness (S) and electrophilicity index (ω) are shown in Table 3. Generally, the energy gap between HOMO and LUMO is an index for the reactivity of the compounds; such that, molecules with the least energy gap are soft and more reactive towards the metal ions and biological receptors compared to those having high values of energy gap [40]. According to the energy gap values of the studied ligands (Table 3), HL2 is chemically more reactive than HL1. Also, the other calculated molecular parameters; χ, µ, η, S and ω point to the same order of reactivity. Furthermore, the calculated energy gap for the [Cu(L1)2].H2O complex (Fig. 9) is quite small (1.594 eV) and hence, this complex is expected to possess some biological activity. Worth to mention that the low dipole moment of all complexes indicates their higher lipophilicity than the corresponding free ligand [41].
Table 3 The calculated molecular parameters of azo-ligands and the synthesized metal complexes of HL1
Compound
|
Total Energy (Hartree)
|
Dipole moment (Debye)
|
EHOMO (eV)
|
ELUMO (eV)
|
ΔE
(eV)
|
η (eV)
|
S
(eV− 1)
|
µ
(eV)
|
χ
(eV)
|
ω
(eV)
|
HL1
|
-801
|
1.087
|
-5.550
|
-2.004
|
3.546
|
1.773
|
0.282
|
-3.777
|
3.777
|
4.023
|
HL2
|
-1040
|
14.68
|
-2.537
|
-0.832
|
1.705
|
0.853
|
0.586
|
-1.685
|
1.685
|
1.664
|
[Cu(L1)2].H2O
|
-3242
|
0.551
|
-8.531
|
-6.937
|
1.594
|
0.797
|
0.627
|
-7.734
|
7.734
|
37.52
|
[Co(L1)2].H2O
|
-3105
|
0.682
|
-8.566
|
-6.815
|
1.751
|
0.876
|
0.571
|
-7.691
|
7.691
|
33.76
|
[Ni(L1)2].H2O
|
-3111
|
0.591
|
-8.522
|
-6.912
|
1.610
|
0.805
|
0.621
|
-7.717
|
7.717
|
36.99
|
3.2.2. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP)
The preferable sites for electrophilic and nucleophilic chemical interactions of a compound can be predicted by constructing the electrostatic potential map on its surface [42]. The color gradually alters from red which represents the regions with high electron density to blue which indicates the regions with electron deficiency. Figures 11 and S22 illustrate the molecular electrostatic potentials of HL1, HL2 and [Cu(L1)2].H2O complex. For instance, the most negative potential sites in HL1 are N(19) and N(20) of the azo group, whereas, the positive potentials are on the hydrogen atoms of the rings with the most electrophilic site on H(18) (Fig. 11a). In the same manner, the active nucleophilic sites are located on the electronegative atoms O(25), O(28) and O(29) in HL2 (Fig. 11c). Also, the low negative potential on the azo group of HL2 ruled out its possibility of being a site of coordination with the metal ion which is in good harmony with the spectral data of the current research. Finally, constructing MEP for biologically active metal complexes is an important step in drug designing procedure. Allocating the nucleophilic and electrophilic centers may shed light on their possible behavior with the cell membrane of microorganisms [42]. [Cu(L1)2].H2O complex showed a positive electrostatic potential on the metal core whereas the negative potentials are found in the outer region of the complex (Fig. S22).
3.2.3. Molecular docking of complexes
The activity of the synthesized metal complex as possible antipathogenic agents was estimated by molecular docking against three receptors: 1bqb, 3t88, and 4esw corresponding to S. Aureus, E. Coli, and C. Albicans proteins respectively [19–21]. The designated pathogenic micro-organisms are Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi that appear on the surfaces of various objects and cause superficial infections of human skin as well as mucous membranes infections. The docking results are displayed in Tables 4, S6 and Figs. 12 & S23-S27. The investigations revealed a strong inhibition effect of the Cu(II) complex against the targeted proteins. However, a less repressive behavior against the three selected proteins was noticed for the HL1 ligand. Clearly, the presence of Cu metal enhances the interaction effect with the receptors through the short metallic bonds of lengths 2.33, 2.31, and 2.20 Å (Table 4). This close ligand-receptor interaction offered high scoring energy (S) of values − 5.9267, -6.8319, and − 7.3764 kcal/mol respectively. Nevertheless, the interaction with the receptor amino acids also includes ionic bond types involving N(20) and N(50) binding sites of the complex. The accountable binding receptors are Aspartate 216 in 1bqb, Glutamate 50 in 4esw, and Aspartate 197 in 3t88 protein. On the other hand, HL1 showed side-chain donor activity toward acidic receptor (Glutamate 145) in 1bqb and side-chain acceptor activity toward basic receptor (Lysine 62) in 4esw (Fig. S23). Also, the best docking poses (Fig. 12b) revealed high ligand occlusion in the electronic cloud of the protein surface that points to high interaction efficiency and great inhibition activity toward the selected pathogens. The simulated antipathogenic activity of Cu(II) complex is in agreement with similar reported Cu(II) complexes [43, 44] and hence was satisfactory to perform the in vitro biological activity which is displayed below. On the other hand, longer interaction distances with amino acids were observed for the complexes [Co(L1)2].H2O and [Ni(L1)2].H2O which results in less scoring energy compared to [Cu(L1)2].H2O.
Table 4 The docking parameters of HL1 and its metal complexes, against 1bqb, 3t88 and 4esw proteins
Complex
|
Receptor
|
Ligand
|
Receptor
|
Interaction
|
Distance
(Å)
|
E
(kcal/mol)
|
S (kcal/mol)
|
HL1
|
1bqb
|
O (17)
C (23)
|
GLU 145
HIS 144
|
H-donor
π-H
|
3.30
4.44
|
-1.1
-1.3
|
-5.1020
|
4esw
|
N(20)
|
LYS 62
|
H-acceptor
|
3.10
|
-1.7
|
-6.1341
|
3t88
|
6-ring
|
MET 198
|
π-H
|
3.99
|
-0.7
|
-5.9277
|
[Cu(L1)2].H2O
|
1bqb
|
Cu (1)
N (20)
N (50)
|
ASP 216
ASP 216
ASP 216
|
Metal
Ionic
Ionic
|
2.33
2.99
2.87
|
-0.9
-4.5
-5.3
|
-5.9267
|
4esw
|
Cu (1)
N (20)
N (50)
|
GLU 50
GLU 50
GLU 50
|
Metal
Ionic
Ionic
|
2.31
2.67
3.05
|
-1.2
-7.1
-4.2
|
-6.8319
|
3t88
|
Cu (1)
N (20)
N (50)
|
ASP 197
ASP 197
ASP 197
|
Metal
Ionic
Ionic
|
2.20
2.78
2.98
|
-1.4
-6.1
-4.8
|
-7.3764
|
[Co(L1)2].H2O
|
1bqb
|
C (5)
|
GLU 145
|
H-donor
|
3.55
|
-0.7
|
-5.8516
|
4esw
|
N (19)
N (49)
|
GLU 50
GLU 50
|
Ionic
Ionic
|
3.22
2.96
|
-3.1
-4.7
|
-6.6237
|
3t88
|
6-ring
6-ring
|
ILE 174
LEU 236
|
π-H
π-H
|
3.99
3.80
|
-1.0
-0.6
|
-6.3274
|
[Ni(L1)2].H2O
|
1bqb
|
6-ring
6-ring
|
ALA 115
HIS 228
|
π-H
π-π
|
4.13
3.60
|
-0.8
-0.6
|
-6.0332
|
4esw
|
N (19)
N (49)
|
GLU 50
GLU 50
|
Ionic
Ionic
|
3.20
2.92
|
-3.3
-5.0
|
-6.1777
|
3t88
|
N (17)
6-ring
|
ASN 202
LEU 236
|
H-acceptor
π-H
|
3.23
3.69
|
-1.2
-0.8
|
-6.4804
|
3.3. Antimicrobial assay of the synthesized metal complexes
The synthesized metal complexes were screened for their activity of inhibition against one Gram-positive (S. Aureus), one Gram-negative (E. Coli) and two fungi (C. Albicans and A. Flavus) utilizing the diffusion agar technique [9, 16]. The comparison between the inhibition zone diameter values of the synthesized complex with the standard drug values of Amphotericin B & Ampicillin (Table 5) suggests that HL1 complexes possess moderate to significant antibacterial activity towards the tested organisms. Notably, Cu(II) complex showed more inhibitory effects than its free ligand HL1. The superior biological activity of the complexes to the free ligands can be explained by Tweedy’s chelation theory [45], where the chelation between the metal ion and the ligand causes a decrease in the polarity of the chelate by delocalization of the π electrons [46]. The allocation of electrons over the entire complex surface enhances its lipophilicity and hence its penetration capability through the phospholipid bilayer membrane of the biological cells [47]. Moreover, metal ions disturb the transfer of electrons in the electron transport chain by acting as terminal electron acceptors within the microbial cell [48, 49]. No activity was observed against A. Flavus. The yielded data of the isolated [Cu(L1)2].H2O complex proposed its antipathogenic potency against the tested strains. However, the less potency of HL1 could be due to its higher polarity that was predicted theoretically which led to unsuccessful disperse through the bacterial cell wall or probably as a result of inactivation of HL1 by certain bacterial enzymes [50]. Moreover, among HL1 metal complexes, Cu(L1) exhibited the most potent inhibition activity. Clearly, Co(II) and Ni(II) complexes of the same geometries and stoichiometries as Cu(II) complexes showed less potency against the same species, implying the importance of the type of metal and its radius on the biological efficiencies of complexes. Additionally, metal complexes of HL2 displayed less biological activity than the corresponding HL1 complexes which could be attributed to the impact of geometrical and molecular size on the antimicrobial performance. Furthermore, Fe(III) complex was the only compound that exhibited inhibition activity against A. Flavus where the superior behavior could be provoked by the redox activity of Fe(III) complexes which facilitate oxidative cell damage.
Table 5 Antimicrobial activity of the synthesized complexes
Compounds
|
Inhibition zone diameter (mm / mg Sample)
|
C. Albicans
|
A. Flavus
|
S. Aureus
|
E. Coli
|
DMSO
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
HL1
|
15.3 ± 0.2
|
-
|
16.9 ± 0.2
|
12.9 ± 0.4
|
[Cu(L1)2].H2O
|
19.6 ± 0.3
|
-
|
20.3 ± 0.5
|
18.8 ± 0.7
|
[Co(L1)2] .H2O
|
12.0 ± 0.4
|
-
|
16.6 ± 0.8
|
15.1 ± 0.3
|
[Ni(L1)2] .H2O
|
13.2 ± 0.1
|
-
|
19.7 ± 0.8
|
17.9 ± 0.7
|
[Fe(HL2)3].H2O
|
15.1 ± 0.4
|
7.3 ± 0.1
|
17.5 ± 0.5
|
16.2 ± 0.6
|
[Co(HL2)2(H2O)2].H2O
|
11.8 ± 0.9
|
-
|
14.0 ± 0.2
|
15.4 ± 0.6
|
[Ni(HL2)2(H2O)2].4H2O
|
15.7 ± 0.5
|
-
|
14.3 ± 0.5
|
15.9 ± 0.7
|
[Cu(HL2)2].2H2O
|
13.8 ± 1.1
|
-
|
17.5 ± 0.7
|
18.6 ± 0.9
|
Ampicillin
|
-
|
-
|
21.4 ± 0.7
|
25.0 ± 1.0
|
Amphotericin B
|
25.4 ± 0.6
|
17.7 ± 1.2
|
-
|
-
|