1. Hull TE, Robertson PB, Steiner JC, del Aguila MA. Patterns of endodontic care for
a Washington state population. J Endod. 2003; 29: 553-6.
2. Akbarzadeh N, Aminoshariae A, Khalighinejad NA, et al. The association between
the anatomic landmarks of the pulp chamber floor and the prevalence of middle mesial
canals mandibular first molars: an in vivo analysis. J Endod. 2017; 43: 1797-801.
3. Berutti E, Fedon G. Thickness of cementum/dentin in mesial roots of mandibular
first molars. J Endod. 1992; 18: 545-8.
4. Abou-Rass M, Frank AL, Glick DH. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the
curved root canal. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 101: 792-4.
5. Saua´ia TS, Gomes BPFA, Pinheiro ET, et al. Thickness of dentine in mesial roots
of mandibular molars with different lengths. Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 555-9.
6. Tabrizizadeh M, Reuben J, Khalesi M, et al. Evaluation of radicular dentin thickness
of danger zone in mandibular first molars. J Dent (Tehran). 2010; 7: 196-9.
7. Olivier JG, García-Font M, Gonzalez-Sanchez JA, Roig-Cayon M, Durán-Sindreu F. Danger zone analysis using cone beam computed tomography after apical enlargement
with K3 and K3XF in a manikin model. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016; 8: e361-e367.
8. Garcia Filho PF, Letra A, Menezes R, Carmo AM. Danger zone in mandibular molars
before instrumentation: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2003; 11: 324-6.
9. Kessler JR, Peters DD, Lorton L. Comparison of the relative risk of molar root
perforations using various endodontic instrumentation techniques. J Endod. 1983; 9:
439-47.
10. Montgomery S. Root canal wall thickness of mandibular molar after biomechanical
preparation. J Endod. 1985; 1: 257-63.
11. Harris SP, Bowles WR, Fok A, McClanahan SB. An anatomic investigation of the mandibular
first molar using micro-computed tomography. J Endod. 2013; 39: 1374-8.
12. Lim SS, Stock CJ. The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filling
compared with step back technique. Int Endod J. 1987; 20: 33-9.
13. Dwivedi S, Dwivedi CD, Mittal N. Correlation of root dentin thickness and length
of roots in mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2014; 40: 1435-8.
14. Raiden G, Koss S, Costa L, et al. Radiographic measurement of residual root thickness
in premolars with post preparation. J Endod. 2001; 27: 296-8.
15. Lee JK, Yoo YJ, Perinpanayagam H, et al. Three-dimensional modelling and concurrent
measurements of root anatomy in mandibular first molar mesial roots using micro-computed
tomography. Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 380-9.
16. Gu Y, Sun C, Wu D, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary
sinus floor using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18: 164.
17. Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, et al. Cone beam computed tomgraphy in endodontics-
a review. Int Endod J. 2015; 48: 3-15.
18. Xu J, He J, Yang Q, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in measuring
dentin thickness and its potential of predicting the remaining dentin thickness after
removing fractured instruments. J Endod. 2017; 43: 1522-7.
19. Isom TL, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC. Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals
after flaring. J Endod. 1995; 21: 368-71.
20. Martins JNR, Ordinola-Zapata R, Marques D, Francisco H, Caramês J. Differences
in root canal system configuration in human permanent teeth within different age groups.
Int Endod J. 2018, 51: 931-41.
21. Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular
and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004;
30: 391-8.
22. Gani OA, Boiero CF, Correa C, et al. Morphological changes related to age in
mesial root canals of permanent mandibular first molars. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014;
27: 105-9.
23. Reis AG, Grazziotin-Soares R, Barletta FB, et al. Second canal in mesiobuccal
root of maxillary molars is correlated with root third and patient age: a cone-beam
computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2013; 39:588-92.
24. Wu D, Zhang G, Liang R, et al. Root and canal morphology of maxillary second molars
by cone-beam computed tomography in a native Chinese population. J Inter Med Res.
2017, 45: 830-42.
25. Johnstone M, Parashos P. Endodontics and the ageing patient. Aus Dent J. 2015,
60: 20-7.
26. ElAyouti A, Dima E, Judenhofer MS, et al. Increased apical enlargement contributes
to excessive dentin removal in curved root canals: a stepwise microcomputed tomography
study. J Endod. 2011; 37: 1580-4.
27. Bryant ST, Dummer PM, Pitoni C, et al. Shaping ability of 0.04 and 0.06 taper
profile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in stimulated root canals. Int Endod J.
1999; 32: 155-64.