Perioperative hemodynamics and metabolic parameters
Figure 1B, C shows dynamic changes of MAP and HR throughout the experiment.MAP in the ARDS group was significantly lower than in the Sham at 2 h, 4 h and 8 h, whereas they markedly improved in the TAG + ARDS group at 2 h (p < 0.05). HR was remarkably higher in the ARDS group compared with the Sham at 4 h, 6 h and 8 h and markedly lower under the TAG pretreatment at 6 h (p < 0.05). Table 2 summarizes the oxygenation and metabolic parameters in each group. The PaO2, SaO2, pH levels in the ARDS group were lower than in the Sham, whereas they markedly improved in the TAG + ARDS group (p < 0.001, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively). The PaCO2 in the ARDS group was higher than in the Sham, whereas they significantly reduced in the TAG + ARDS group (p < 0.01).
Effects of TAG on OA-induced lung injury
We established a rat model of OA-induced ARDS to assess whether TAG affects lung injury. As shown in Figure 2A, the lung tissues in the ARDS group showed dark-red congestion, edema, and exudation compared with those in the Sham group. All three signs significantly improved under the TAG pretreatment. Moreover, histological analysis of lung tissues indicated that increased infiltration of inflammatory cells in the alveolar cavity, edema, and interstitial thickening observed in the ARDS group considerably improved in the TAG + ARDS group (Figure 2B). Lung injury score was also significantly lower in the TAG + ARDS group than in the ARDS (2.77 ± 0.40 vs. 4.69 ± 0.20, p < 0.01; Figure 2C). The protein levels in BALF were higher in the ARDS group than in the Sham and were significantly reduced by the TAG pretreatment (6.76 ± 0.61 vs. 12.18 ± 0.89, p < 0.001; Figure 2D). Similarly, the Wet/Dry ratio of lung tissues in the ARDS group was higher than that in the Sham and significantly decreased under the TAG pretreatment (7.80 ± 0.60 vs. 11.39 ± 0.85, p < 0.01; Figure 2E). OI of all animal groups was lower than 300 after establishing the ARDS model and markedly improved in the TAG + ARDS group versus the ARDS (140.30 ± 8.51 vs. 363.30 ± 18.56, p < 0.001; Figure 2F). The PaCO2 level was significantly higher in the ARDS group compared with the Sham and the TAG pretreatment decreased the level (48.09 ± 2.71 vs. 64.22 ± 2.83, p < 0.01; Figure 2G). The pH level was significantly lower in the ARDS group compared with the Sham and the TAG pretreatment increased the level (7.18 ± 0.02 vs. 7.32 ± 0.02, p < 0.01; Figure 2H).
Effects of TAG on ARDS-induced inflammation
To determine whether TAG also affects ARDS-induced inflammation, we performed immunohistochemistry staining and ELISA. The results revealed that more cells were positive for the neutrophil-specific marker MPO in the ARDS group than in the Sham, and their number significantly reduced under the TAG pretreatment (27.49 ± 3.29 vs. 62.25 ± 7.12, p < 0.01; Figure 3A, B). Furthermore, the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 in BALF and lung tissues were higher in the ARDS group than in the Sham, and the TAG pretreatment decreased their levels (62.82 ± 3.53 vs. 74.69 ± 3.89, 56.53 ± 6.89 vs. 77.55 ± 6.63, 38.34 ± 2.56 vs. 45.68 ± 3.11, and 65.83 ± 3.05 vs. 77.56 ± 3.22 for the BALF, respectively, p < 0.05; 44.62 ± 4.22 vs. 65.76 ± 3.72, p < 0.01, 51.74 ± 4.52 vs. 67.68 ± 7.19, p < 0.05, 29.36 ± 1.77 vs. 37.94 ± 2.47, p < 0.01, and 53.22 ± 2.87 vs. 65.00 ± 3.47, p < 0.05 for the lung, respectively; Figures 3C, D).
Effects of TAG on ARDS-induced apoptosis and PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway
We also performed TUNEL staining to detect apoptotic cells in lung tissues (Figure 4A). We found more apoptotic cells in the ARDS group than in the Sham and observed significantly fewer apoptotic cells in the TAG + ARDS group (13.31 ± 2.50 vs. 37.98 ± 7.85, p < 0.01; Figure 4B). In addition, we quantified the expression levels of apoptosis-related and central proteins in the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway with western blotting (Figure 4C). The expression levels of PTEN, Bax/Bcl-2 and Cleaved-Caspase3 were significantly downregulated in the TAG + ARDS group compared with the ARDS, confirming TAG relieves apoptosis (0.45 ± 0.06 vs. 0.87 ± 0.08, 0.88 ± 0.06 vs. 1.36 ± 0.17, 0.63 ± 0.06 vs. 0.87 ± 0.05, respectively, p < 0.01; Figure 4D). Conversely, the TAG pretreatment remarkably upregulated p-AKT/AKT expression (0.64 ± 0.09 vs. 1.06 ± 0.05, p < 0.01; Figure 4D). The RT-qPCR results show that the levels of pten and akt mRNAwere lower than in the TAG + ARDS group compared with the ARDS group (0.59 ± 0.23 vs. 5.87 ± 0.51, p < 0.001, 0.98 ± 0.13 vs. 1.05 ± 0.07, p > 0.05, respectively; Figure 4E). However, TAG pretreatment markedly upregulated level of pi3k mRNA compared with the ARDS group (0.66 ± 0.15 vs. 0.94 ± 0.08, p < 0.05; Figure 4F).
Effects of TAG on ARDS-induced alveolar and endothelial damage
Next, we performed immunofluorescence staining and western blotting to determine whether TAG affects the alveolar structure and the juxtaposed endothelium under inflammatory conditions. We double-stained alveolar epithelial cells for markers of alveolar type Ⅰ and Ⅱ cells (AQP5 and SPC) (Figure 5A). Results show that the expression levels of SPC and AQP5 in the ARDS group were lower than in the Sham but significantly higher on the TAG pretreatment (14.41 ± 4.65 vs. 41.40 ± 4.33, p < 0.01; Figure 5B). We also stained vascular endothelial cells for the vascular marker CD31 and found numerous vascular endothelial cells in the TAG + ARDS group compared with the ARDS (10.76 ± 1.96 vs. 16.88 ± 2.01, p < 0.01; Figure 5C, D). The RT-qPCR results show that the levels of spc, aqp5, claudin4 and keratin8 mRNA are markedly higher in the TAG + ARDS group compared with the ARDS group (0.26 ± 0.09 vs. 0.76 ± 0.12, 0.44 ± 0.06 vs. 0.71 ± 0.05, 0.32 ± 0.06 vs. 0.59 ± 0.05, and 0.48 ± 0.11 vs. 0.72 ± 0.09, respectively, p < 0.01; Figure 5G, 6G).
Effects of TAG on differentiation of alveolar type II cells
The transitional state of alveolar type II cells was marked by Claudin 4 and Keratin 8 (Figure 6A, C). We identified significantly more ATII cells in the transitional state in the TAG + ARDS group than in the ARDS (9.34 ± 2.94 vs. 25.52 ± 3.03, p < 0.01, 6.63 ± 1.45 vs. 27.23 ± 2.51, p < 0.001, respectively; Figure 6B, D). In addition, the expression levels of Claudin 4 and Keratin 8 proteins in the ARDS group were lower than in the Sham but increased under the TAG pretreatment (0.48 ± 0.07 vs. 0.72 ± 0.06 and 0.44 ± 0.06 vs. 0.77 ± 0.05, respectively, p < 0.01; Figure 6E, F).