Describes the characteristic of the patients from whom H. pylori strains were isolated by histopathology test, molecular identification, and bacterial culturing illustrated in additional file6.
4.1 Cyp2c19*1, *2, and *3 allele distribution
According to our experimental study, frequent allelic polymorphism through cyp2c19 *1(which is the wild type) *2 and *3, denoted for w3 (81%) p≤0.001, was circulated intra total number of enrolled patients. The next were*2 for (13.5%) p-value ≤0.001, w2 (3.1%) p ≤0.75 and *3(2.08%) p ≤0.75.
According to the present study, the frequency of *3 and w2 in distribution were the lowest but more than 1%. Chi-Square (χ2) Statistic analysis reports of cyp2c19 *1 variants distributed in the total patients attended in this work (as the reference group) in comparison to histopathological positive Helicobacter pylori, molecular positive H pylori, and culture positive group considered to be significant p-value≤ 0.001, and in CAM-R strains reported for p= 0.75. cyp2c19 *2 allele-span through mentioned classified groups considered to be significant p-value- ≤ 0.001 and circulation of cyp2c19 *3 within total examined subjects noted for p≤ 0.75.
4.2 Accumulation of cyp2c19 *2 variants among phenotypically and molecular characterized CAM-R strains
Spanning of the cyp2c19 *1, *2, and *3 allelic polymorphism inter culture positive Helicobacter pylori strains demonstrated the prevalence of w3 (70.49%) *2(21.30%) and w2 (4.9%) and *3(3.27%), totally. The dominant allelic-polymorphism through CAM-resistant strains 81.25% was recorded for *2 p-value ≤0.001, and 18.75% for w2 p ≤0.75, respectively. Because of accumulation of rpl22 9bp insertion, rpl22 3bp deletion and the only one A2143C point mutations related to CAM-resistance in *2 PM, and *2 Het-EM metabolizer class; therefore, it is clear that the cross point between the most frequent allele that distributed in CAM-R strains will be *2(81.25%), and w2 for 18.75%. Distribution of w3 and *3 among CAM-resistant strains noted to be zero, Fig 1.
4.3 Characterization of PPIs catabolization pattern within the patients totally
The release of our experiment demonstrated that through the total number of the patients (n=96), there were 81.2% distinct for Homozygor extensive PPIs metabolizer with the allelic pattern of (w3/w3), 6.25% of the patients classified in Het-EM with the allelic pattern of (w2/*2) and the rest of 12.48% have been characterized for poor metabolizer category, with the allelic pattern of (*2/*2) for 10.4% and (*3/*3) for 2.08%. The pattern of (w3/*3) Het-EM was not obviously detected in our experiment.
4.4 Cyp2c19 phenotype distribution between infected individuals
Comparative analysis of the total number of the patients demonstrated that 63/96 histopathological examined patients and 61/96 molecular identified patients were H. pylori positive. Distribution of the Hom-EM (w3/w3), Het-EM (w2/*2) and PM phenotypes in infected individuals by histopathological and molecular tests reports, were ordinarily 65.6%, 9.52%, 19.4% and 70.49%,9.83%, and 19.66%. Poor metabolization pattern within the Histopathological reported H. pylori positive patients were (*2/*2)15.87%, (*3/*3) 3.17% and for molecular identified patients recorded 16.39% for (*2/*2) and 3.27% for (*3/*3).
4.5 PPIs metabolizer phenotype patterns and profile of CAM-resistant
In the manner of cyp2c19 gene dosage profiling between CAM-R strains that circulated through the population with the perspective of personalized therapy; replacement of the drug, duration or drug dosing; first, 35/96 (37%) of the individual phenotypically evaluated Helicobacter pylori positive, that the prevalence of Hom-EM participants (w3/w3), Het-EM(w2/*2) and PM (*2/*2) vs (*3/*3) were reported 48.57%, 17.14%, 28.57 and 5.7 % ordinarily. Already Details of results accumulated in Table 1. In this survey, there was significant coverage between CAM-resistant strains 16/35(37%) and distribution of two phenotypes of PPIs metabolization rate: 62.5% for PM (*2/*2) and 37.5% for Het-EM (w2/*2). The more interesting notification of our results was the accumulation of the total number of the point mutations (A2143C and rpl22 GTG deletion or 9bp insertion) correlated with the CAM-R strains in two phenotypes: PM (*2/*2), and Het-EM(w2/*2). According to our study from (10/16) 62% of poor metabolizer patients were characterized for allelic pattern of (*2/*2); spanning of CAM-R related point mutations noted to be: 1/10 for A2143C, 8/10 for rpl229bp insertion, and 2/10 for rpl22 GTG deletion and 9bp insertion. The molecular pattern of the rest of 6/16 (37%) CAM-R isolates with rpl22 9bp insertion, classified in Het-EM Table 2.