Adaptation on xylose improves glucose-xylose co-utilization and ethanol production in a carbon catabolite repression (CCR) compromised ethanologenic strain

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1672881/v1

PDF

Research Article

Adaptation on xylose improves glucose-xylose co-utilization and ethanol production in a carbon catabolite repression (CCR) compromised ethanologenic strain

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1672881/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Sugar hydrolyzates from lignocellulosic biomass are majorly composed of glucose and xylose that can be fermented to biofuels. Bacteria, despite having the natural ability to consume xylose are unable to consume it in presence of glucose due to a Carbon Catabolite Repression (CCR) mechanism, leading to overall reduced productivity and incomplete xylose utilization due to ethanol build-up. In our effort to develop a strain for simultaneous fermentation of glucose and xylose into ethanol, we deleted ptsG in ethanologenic E.coli SSK42 to make it deficient in CCR and performed adaptive laboratory evolution to achieve accelerated growth rate, sugar consumption and ethanol production. Finally, we performed proteomics study to identify changes that might have been responsible for the observed improved phenotype of the evolved strain.

Results: The parental strain of SSK42, i.e., wild-type E.coli B, did not co-utilize glucose and xylose as expected. After deleting the ptsG gene encoding the EIIBC^Glc subunit of PTS system, glucose consumption is severely affected in wild-type E.coli B. However, the ethanologenic, SSK42 strain, which was evolved in our earlier study on both glucose and xylose, didn’t show such a drastic effect of EIIBC^Glc deletion, instead consumed glucose first, followed by xylose without delay for switching from one sugar to another. To improve growth on xylose and co-utilization capabilities, the ptsG deleted SSK42 was evolved on xylose. The strain evolved for 78 generations, strain SCD78, displayed significant co-utilization of glucose and xylose sugars. At the bioreactor level, the strain SCD78 produced 3-times the ethanol titer of the parent strain with significant glucose-xylose co-utilization. The rate of glucose and xylose consumption also increased 3.4-fold and 3-fold, respectively. Proteome data indicates significant upregulation of TCA cycle proteins, respiration-related proteins and some transporters which may have a role in increasing the total sugar consumption and co-utilization of sugars.

Conclusion: Through adaptive evolution, we have obtained a strain that has a significant glucose-xylose co-utilization phenotype with 3-fold higher total sugar consumption rate and ethanol production rate compared to the unevolved strain. This study also points out that adaptation on xylose is enough to impart glucose–xylose co-utilization property in CCR compromised ethanologenic strain SSK42.

E.coil B

ethanologenic strain

EIIBCGlc

sugar mixture

co-utilization

bioreactor

carbon catabolite repression

adaptive laboratory evolution

The world is facing severe environmental problems due to excessive dependence on fossil fuels and their exhaustive use. Biofuels, especially those derived from lignocellulosic biomass, are considered as preferred option of producing energy because they are sustainable, eco-friendly and do not compete with food (1). A huge amount of lignocellulosic biomass waste (billions of tons) is generated annually worldwide, most of which is either burned or discarded (2). The lignocellulosic biomass is generally consist of 40–50% cellulose, 25–30% hemicellulose, 15–20% lignin and other minor components (3, 4). Biomass can be biologically converted into bioethanol and other economically important products such as lactate, butanol, bioplastic etc. (5–10).

The biomass, after pretreatment and hydrolysis, is left with mainly the mixture of sugars. Glucose and xylose are the two major sugars in this mixure, accounting for ~ 90% of all the sugars (11). The bacteria, like E. coli, has inherent capability of consuming hexoses as well as pentoses, as opposed to commonly used ethanol fermeting yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisieae, which naturally doesn’t have the ability to consume pentose sugars. Therefore, many efforts have been made to engineer these bacteria for ethanol production (12). However, owing to the phenomena of Carbon Catabolite Repression (CCR), the bacteria are only able to consume xylose after they have exploited all the glucose. This preferential sugar consumption strategy increases the total fermentation time and hence the economic burden on product formation at pilot scale. Simultaneous sugar consumption from a mixture of sugars (lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysate) is an efficient strategy for economical product formation (13).

To break the sequential sugar consumption behavior, many strategies, including algorithm-based target identification (14) and ALE-based sugar transporter engineering (16), have been adopted. However, the most widely exploited system for preventing the sequential sugar consumption had been the phosphotransferase system of glucose transport (17–19). Zhou et. al. have reported an increase in lactic acid production in E.coli strain devoid of glucose repression by deleting ptsG gene and performing ALE for improved glucose and xylose consumption (18). After adaptation on glucose the average sugar consumption of 1.04 g/l/h was reported, nevertheless, xylose consumption remained minimal until glucose concentration fell below certain level. Guang Zhao, also made use of a ptsG knockout E.coli strain for the production of valuable aromatic chemical 4-hydroxymandelic acid using a mixture of glucose and xylose (19). Alterthum and Ingram have reported high ethanol production in E. coli using single substrate by heterologous expression of alcohol dehydrogenase and pyruvate decarboxylate from Zymomonas mobilis (12). Nicols et. al., have expressed these two enzymes in a CCR compromised (i.e., ptsG deleted) E. coli strain and demonstrated co-consumption of Glucose, xylose and arabinose for production of ethanol (20). However, the total fermentation time increased from 45 hr in parental strain to 70 hr in CCR compromised strain.

In the current study, we wanted to address the issue of growth delay in the CCR compromised ethanologenic strain for co-fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars. We used E. coli strain SSK42, a derivative of E. coli B, as a platform host for this study as this strain was engineered earlier to produce ethanol without the need of any heterologous genes by modulating the expression of endogeneous pathway (21, 22). The strain was further evolved alternatively on glucose and xylose to improve the growth rate and ethanol productivity on both the sugars (21, 22). In this study, the ptsG gene was deleted in SSK42 to remove the CCR, and the adaptive laboratory evolution was performed to improve the growth and sugar consumption rate of the engineered strain (Fig. 1). Finally, the proteomic study was performed to understand the factors that might have contributed to the enhanced growth and sugar consumtion.

Effect of ptsG deletion on E. coli B and ethanologenic SSK42 strains

The ptsG gene was deleted in the parental E. coli B strain and its ethanologenic derivative SSK42 to evaluate and compare its deletion impact on CCR mechanism in these strains. The sugar consumption behavior of all the strains was determined in minimal media containing a mixture of glucose and xylose (~ 1.5 g/L each sugar) as carbon source. Experiment was performed in screw capped Hungate tubes to maintain micro-aerobic condition. Samples were removed from the tubes every three hours and analyzed for growth, sugars and metabolites as mentioned in methods section.

The wild type E. coli B strain consumed complete glucose within 6 hr of growth, while no significant consumption of xylose was observed under the given condition (Fig. 2a). It was noticed that the strain E.coli B didn’t switch to xylose sugar even after 9 hr of completely consuming the glucose. Upon ptsG deletion, the strain E.coli BΔptsG showed a severely impaired glucose metabolism with only ≈ 0.3 g/L glucose consumed in 15 hr (Fig. 2b). This was not surprising because the most dominant glucose PTS transporter component EIIBC^Glc has been deleted in this strain. The elimination of the carbon catabolite repression due to deletion of ptsG permitted the cells to now consume ≈ 1.2 g/L of xylose in 15 hr at a maximum consumption rate of 0.21 ± 0.02 g/L/hr, with ≈ 0.3 g/L of xylose still remaining in the medium (Table 1, Fig. 2b).

Table 1

Sugar consumption and product formation profiles in the Hungate tube experiment
Parameters of sugar consumption, product formation, and growth during 15 hr of cultivation
Strains	Max. sugar consumption rate (g/L/hr)		Rate of production (g/L/hr)
Strains	Glucose (Time interval)	Xylose (Time interval)	Cells	Ethanol
E.coli B	0.24 ± 0.01 (3–6 hr)	No consumption	0.06 ± 0.00	0.08 ± 0.00
E.coli B ΔptsG	0.02 ± 0.00 (3–15 hr)	0.21 ± 0.02 (3–6 hr)	0.07 ± 0.00	0.05 ± 0.00
SSK42	0.42 ± 0.01 (3–6 hr)	0.44 ± 0.03 (6–9 hr)	0.12 ± 0.00	0.56 ± 0.00
SCD00	0.30 ± 0.02 (6–9 hr)	0.27 ± 0.03 (9–12 hr)	0.05 ± 0.01	0.19 ± 0.02
SCD78	0.22 ± 0.00 (6–9 hr)	0.17 ± 0.01 (3–6 hr)	0.06 ± 0.01	0.24 ± 0.00

The sugar utilization pattern of SSK42 and its ΔptsG derivative (strain SCD00) were relatively better. Similar to E. coli B, the ethanologenic strain SSK42 consumed all the glucose in first 6 hr (Fig. 2c). Nevertheless, it quickly sihifted its metabolism on xylose without any delay and consumed all the xylose in next 6 hr (Fig. 2c), as against E. coli B that could not shift its metabolism even after 9 hr of glucose consumption (Fig. 2a). This behavious of SSK could be due to the fact that it has been adapted using the alternating sugar strategy where the sugar was exchanged (glucose to xylose and vice-versa) with each successive passage (22), which might have helped in switching the metabolism on alternate sugar quickly. However, there was no evidence of co-utilization of glucose and xylose in SSK42 (Fig. 2c). When we analyzed the impact of ptsG deletion in SSK42, we found that the resultant strain SCD00 did not show as drastic effect on glucose utilization as shown by the E.coli BΔptsG, instead it still consumed the glucose first followed by the xylose (Fig. 2d), similar to SSK42. This behavior could also be attributed to the previous passaging of SSK42 strain on alternate sugar (22), which perhaps allowed glucose to get transported inside the cells via other routes beside the glucose specific PTS system. The important observation in the fermentation profile of SCD00 was some degree of co-utilization of xylose (~ 0.4 g/L) in presence of glucose within 9 hr of cultivation (Fig. 2d).

To further confirm the co-utilization ability of SCD00, we cultivated the strain in a bioreactor under controlled condition along with SSK42 as control at 10 g/L of each glucose and xylose. We observed in the bioreactor for the strain SSK42 that the glucose remained as preferred carbon source (Fig. 3a). It first consumed glucose in 18 hr followed by additional 42 hr for xylose consumption. It consumed all the sugar present in 60 hr at an average total sugar consumption rate of 0.38 ± 0.07 g/L/hr without significant co-utilization of the sugars. On the other hand, the fermentation profile of SCD00 indicated a significant co-utilization of both the sugars until about 36 hr of cultivation (Fig. 3b), but took 124 hr to consume glucose to completion while approximately 3.0 g/L xylose still remained in the media (Additional data, Fig. S1). The average total sugar consumption rate achieved by strain SCD00, i.e, 0.16 ± 0.02 g/L/hr, was almost 2.5 times lesser to that of strain SSK42. The individual glucose and xylose consumption rates for strain SCD00 were 0.13 ± 0.00 g/L, each, and for SSK42 were 0.54 ± 0.01 and 0.25 ± 0.00 g/L, respectively. This corresponded to roughly 4 fold decrease in glucose consumption rate and approximately 2 fold decrease in xylose consumption rate due to deletion of ptsG gene in SSK42. As a result of lower sugar consumption rate, the biomass and ethanol productivity also suffered significantly (Fig. 3a and 3b).

Strain SSK42 displayed almost continuous growth till both the sugars were consumed completely (Fig. 3a). On the other hand, the strain SCD00 displayed a biphasic growth pattern, where it exhibited co-utilization until the end of first growth phase (0–36 hrs). The second growth phase (which starts at 60 hr) appears to be primarily on glucose consumption, although xylose consumption was not completely stopped (Fig. 3b). Strain SCD00 could only achieve a maximum optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) of ~ 2 in 96 hr as against an OD₆₀₀ of ~ 3 achieved by strains SSK42 in 48 hr. With respect to ethanol titer, ptsG deletion resulted in more than two times decrease in the final ethanol titer, i.e., the maximum ethanol titers for SSK42 and SCD00 were 7.17 ± 0.28 g/L and 3.10 ± 0.29 g/L, respectively.

Overall, we observed a severe negative impact of ptsG deletion on total sugar consumption, thereby impacting growth and ethanol production. Nevertheless, a major positive impact of ptsG deletion apparent in the engineered strain was the glucose–xylose co-utilization. Co-utilization being the main objective of this study, it was decided to further improve the growth, total sugar consumption and hence the ethanol production of the strain SCD00 via adaptive laboratory evolution. Although consumption of both the sugars was affected by ptsG deletion, the glucose was still consumed before xylose. Hence, we decided to first carry out the adaptation of SCD00 in xylose containing minimal medium.

Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of the strain SCD00

The ptsG deleted engineered ethanologenic E. coli strain, i.e., SCD00, was subjected to adaptation in increasing concentration of xylose (Fig. 1), as xylose consumption rate was slower than glucose.

As mentioned in materials and methods section, the strain SCD00 was first evolved in CSTR at a very slow dilution rate, followed by passaging on agar plate. The strain was then passaged in Hungate tubes (containing 10 ml AM1 medium supplemented with 0.2% xylose) with all the biomass generated being added into the fresh medium every 24 hr. Whole biomass passaging was continued for 14 days with xylose concentration increasing to 0.4% on 8th day of passaging. Due to total biomass transfer to fresh media, the extent of competition is higher even when the spent media is replenished with the fresh one everyday. During the total biomass transfer phase of adaptation (phase I), the specific growth rate of the bacteria kept on declining to as low as 0.01 hr^− 1 and below (Fig. 4). Initial phase of evolution and total biomass transfer (phase I) would have helped to screen out the cells unsuitable for adaptation phase in growth conditions of choice. Bacterial cells which are robust enough to withstand the competition will still grow and take longer to enter stationary phase while less vigorous cells will enter stationary phase early or may simply die. Upon addition of fresh media, stationary phase cells take longer to start dividing again as compared to cells which are already in log phase or early stationary phase. This phase of rapid growth can be utilized to enrich comparatively robust cells in the given conditions for the adaptation experiment. We wanted to use this strategy to screen the healthy cells as a initial step of the adaptive laboratory evolution experiment.

Upon increasing the xylose concentration from 0.2 to 0.4% on 8th day of passaging, there was a slight impact on the specific growth rate (Fig. 4). On the 14th day and onwards, passaging was carried out with 0.1 OD₆₀₀ being inoculated into the fresh medium (Phase II) every day for 41 days. A rapid increase in specific growth rate was observed on 15th day (Fig. 4). We reasoned that, less inoculum being used for next passages resulted in the competition for resources becoming a bit lenient, hence the observed rapid increase in specific growth rate of the mutant bacteria.

The culture was adapted for total of 48 days (including CSTR adaptation), during which the culture has under gone approximately 113 doublings as calculated using the following equation –

$$\mu =\frac{\text{ln}\left({X}_{t}\right)-\text{l}\text{n}\left({X}_{t=0}\right)}{t}$$

$$Doubling time \left({T}_{g}\right)= \frac{0.693}{\mu }$$

Where µ is the specific growth rate, t is the time (hr), X_t is dry cell weight (DCW) in g/L at time t. T_g represents the doubling time or generation time in Equation − 2.

The specific growth rate of the mutant strain remained close to 0.08 hr^− 1 throughout the phase II of the adaptation. We did the sampling on 41st day of tube transfer, which corresponded to approximately 78 generations and this strain was named SCD78. In a separate adaptation experiment, the strain SCD00 was also adapted on glucose followed by xylose for a total of 1200 generations to also improve the growth on glucose. However, it was observed that in this strain, named SCD1200, the carbon catabolite repression system seemed to have overwhelmed again and impacted the co-utilization of sugars (Supplementary Fig. S2), a behaviour worth investigating in future.

Substrate Co-utilization Behavior Of Adapted Strain

Sugar consumption behavior of the adapted strain was determined in a minimal medium containing a mixture of glucose and xylose (1.5 g/L each sugar) as carbon source. Experiment was performed in screw capped Hungate tubes to maintain micro-aerobic condition. Samples were removed from the tubes every three hours and analyzed for growth, sugars and metabolites as mentioned in methods section.

The evolved SCD78 strain doesn’t appear to favor any sugar over the other among glucose and xylose, instead, it consumed all the available sugar within 12 hr by simultaneously consuming both the sugars- glucose and xylose at maximum consumption rate of 0.22 ± 0.00 and 0.17 ± 0.01 g/L/hr respectively with a maximum ethanol production rate of 0.24 ± 0.00 g/L/hr from 6th to 12th hr of fermentation (Fig. 5a). Strain SCD78 produced 23% higher ethanol titer in 12 hr, i.e., 1.68 g/L as compared to that achieved by strain SCD00 in 15 hr (Fig. 2d).

Based on the behavior in the Hungate tube experiment, the evolved strain SCD78 was selected for the bioreactor study under control condition. Strains were cultivated in a sugar mixture containing 10 g/L glucose and xylose each in AM1 minimal medium under controlled conditions as mentioned in method section The strain SCD78 generated by adaptive laboratory evolution of SCD00 showed a significantly improved growth profile as compared to the control SCD00 strain (Fig. 3b and Fig. 5b) (Table 2). It reached an OD₆₀₀ of roughly 3 times that of the control strain, i.e., OD₆₀₀ of 4.2, at 42 hr.

Significant co-utilization was observed in both the strains at the reactor level (Fig. 2b and 5b), as opposed to the Hungate tube experiment where SCD00 strain consumed glucose first with a minimal degree of co-utilization observed (Fig. 2d). Nevertheless, the strain SCD78 rapidly consumed both the sugars simultaneously within 36 hrs at a maximum sugar consumption rate of 0.63 ± 0.07 and 0.66 ± 0.02 g/L/hr for glucose and xylose, respectively. The control strain (SCD00), on the other hand, consumed only about 5.4 ± 0.10 g/l of glucose and about 5.4 ± 0.16 g/l of xylose simultaneously in 48 hr of fermentation. The maximum consumption rate achieved was only 0.23 ± 0.02 and 0.33 ± 0.08 g/L/hr for glucose and xylose, respectively, indicating that strain SCD78 exhibited approximately 2.8 times higher glucose consumption rate and roughly 2 times higher xylose consumption rate.

Table 2

Fermentation parameters of SCD78 vs SCD00 in bioreactor study
Strain	Sugar consumption rate (g/L/hr)			Max. product titer (g/L)		Yield (g product/g total sugar consumed)		% Theoretical yield of ethanol	Max growth rate (g/L/hr)	Max. volumetric ethanol productivity (g/L/hr)
Strain	Total sugar	Glucose	Xylose	Biomass	Ethanol	Biomass	Ethanol	% Theoretical yield of ethanol	Max growth rate (g/L/hr)	Max. volumetric ethanol productivity (g/L/hr)
SCD00	0.26 ± 0.01	0.13 ± 0.00	0.13 ± 0.00	0.72 ± 0.00	3.10 ± 0.29	0.06 ± 0.00	0.29 ± 0.02	55.81 ± 3.92	0.05 ± 0.01 (12–18 hr)	0.15 ± 0.01 (12–18 hr)
SCD78	0.80 ± 0.03	0.44 ± 0.07	0.42 ± 0.01	2.10 ± 0.01	8.99 ± 0.22	0.11 ± 0.01	0.46 ± 0.02	84.35 ± 2.73	0.10 ± 0.01 (18–24 hr)	0.56 ± 0.05 (24–30 hr)

As expected, the strain SCD78 also performed better for ethanol production, with approximately 3 times higher ethanol titer observed after 36 hr of fermentation. Strain SCD00 produced a maximum ethanol titer of 3.10 ± 0.29 g/L with maximum volumetric ethanol productivity of 0.15 ± 0.01 g/L/hr achieved between 12 to 18 hr of fermentation (Table 4). On the other hand, SCD78 produced 8.99 ± 0.22 g/L ethanol with maximum volumetric productivity 3.7 times that of control strain (0.56 ± 0.05 g/L/hr), achieved between 24 to 30 hr of fermentation. The ethanol produced by control strain (SCD00) and SCD78 corresponds to 55.81 ± 3.92% and 84.35 ± 2.73% of theoretical limit. Apart from ethanol, small quantities of acetate and succinate were identified as products formed during fermentation, however no succinate was detected for strain SCD00 (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Proteomic insights of engineered and adapted strains

Deletion of ptsG led to co-utilization of sugars, and further adpatation on xylose not only improved the xylose consumption rate of the evolved strain, but also improved the glucose consumption rate.To understand the reason for these cellular bahvious, a whole cell proteome analysis was done for the strains SSK42, SCD00 and SCD78 to get an insight of the protein expression level. All the three strains were grown in a mixture of glucose and xylose (10 g/l each) in the bioreactor and samples were harvested in the early to mid-log phase of the growth (See methods section).The abundance values for each protein identified were normalized using quantile normalization algorithm and differential expression was compared using software named NormalyzerDE. Only the targets having log₂ fold change of ≥ 2 with P – values ≤ 0.05 were considered for further analysis. All the differentially expressed proteins are mentioned in Table S1 and S2.

a) Comparison of protein profiles of SCD00 with respect to SSK42

Upregulated proteins: A total of 55 proteins were found to be overexpressed in SCD00 in comparison to SSK42 (Fig. 6a and 6b). Interstingly, the major pathways that got upregulated upon ptsG deletion are the energy yielding aerobic pathways. Citric acid cycle appears to be impacted the most since eight proteins belonging to citric acid cycle were significantly overexpressed (Fig. 7a). These eight proteins are FumA (Fumarate hydratase), SdhA (Succinate dehydrogenase subunit), SdhB (Succinate dehydrogenase;Fe-S subunit), SucD (Succinyl Co-A synthetaase subunit α), SucC (Succinyl-CoA synthetase subunit β), SucB (Dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase) and SucA (α-Ketoglutarate decarboxylase). These protein targets indicate up-regulation of TCA cycle flux from 2-oxoglutarate to malate which generate many important precursor metabolites and energy. Second most impacted pathway category is oxidative phosphorylation, followed by pyruvate metabolism and ABC transporters. Overexpression of NuoI (NADH dehydrogenase subunit I), NuoB (NADH dehydrogenase subunit B) and NuoE (NADH dehydrogenase subunit E) indicates the higher activity of NADH: quinone oxidoreductase system, which along with SdhA and SdhB overexpression indicates higher oxidoreductase activity in strain SCD00 compared to SSK42. YqiC (Ubiquinone biosynthesis accessory factor; UbiK) which is involved in biosynthesis of electron carrier ubiquinone pool (23) and HybC (Hydrogenase 2 large subunit) which is also the part of E. coli respiration system were found to be overexpressed by approximately 2 log₂fold. This shows that there is significant re-arrangement in the respiration system related proteins in strain SCD00 as compared to SSK42.

Amino acid recycling proteins also were found to be upregulated. Aspartate ammonia-lyase (AspA) is overexpressed by more than 6 log₂fold. L-aspartate serves as high quality nitrogen source under nitrogen limited conditions and AspA is required to convert L-aspartate into fumarate and ammonia, thereafter, ammonia can serve as a source of precursor for L-glutamine, L-glutamate, nucleotides and amino sugars (24). SdaA (L-serine deaminase I) overexpressed by almost 3 log₂fold catalyzes the conversion of the L-serine into pyruvate and ammonia.

The D-galactose/methyl-galactoside ABC transporter periplasmic binding protein (MglB) showed approx. 6 log₂fold overexpression, suggesting that it can act as a major glucose transporter inside the cell in a strain lacking the main glucose transporter gene ptsG (25, 26), hence an important target for increasing glucose utilization. Two gluconeogenic enzymes, PckA (Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase) and PpsA (Phosphoenol pyruvate synthase), are also found to be significantly overexpressed. Both of these enzyme are reported to be important during diauxy shift of E.coli from glucose to acetate consumption (27). TalB (Transaldolase B), an enzyme of pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) which along with transketolase establishes a reversible link between PPP and glycolysis, is also found to be overexpressed by more than 2 log₂fold. The ptsG deletion also led to overexpression of proteins related to xylose consumption i.e., XylA (xylose isomerase) and XylB (xylulokinase), which along with TalB overexpression indicates higher activity of PPP and supports the co-utlization behavior of SCD00 for xylose and glucose. There is more than 3 log₂fold overexpression of proteins involved in transport and metabolism of ribose sugar such as – D-ribose periplasmic binding protein ([locus_tag = ECB_02650), RbsA (Ribose ABC transporter ATP binding subunit), RbsB (D-ribose ABC transporter periplasmic binding protein) and RbsD (Ribose pyranase). GlpK (Glycerol kinase) was also overexpressed by 4 log₂fold in SCD00. There are reports that GlpK activity is inhibited in presence of un-phosphorylated EIIA^Glc but not the EIIA^Glc-℗ (28, 29). Therefore in the strain SCD00, which is supposed to have most of EIIA^Glc in phosphorylated form i.e EIIA^Glc-℗, it may be possible that GlpK activity is not inhibited and, in addition, 4 log₂fold higher expression of GlpK may help in increasing the total carbon recovery by utilizing the glycerol moiety of phospholipids and triglycerides.

Lon (Lon protease) involved in protein homeostasis and quality control of proteins is found to be upregulated by more than 4 log₂fold. The protein YghZ (L- glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate reductase) is found to be overexpressed by more than 3 log₂fold. It has been hypothesized that, YghZ might have role to play in detoxifying the toxic metabolite L-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and also the methylglyoxal (30). A broad specificity aldehyde dehydrogenase A (AldA; NAD-linked) is also found to be upregulated. It has been re-annotated to succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (31).

Downregulated proteins: A total of 44 proteins were significantly down-regulated, which include the members of glutamate transport and metabolism pathway - GltB (Glutamate synthase subunit) and GltI (Glutamate and aspartate transporter subunit), Fructose PTS transport system - FruA (Fused fructose specific PTS enzymes: IIB/IIC component), FruB (Fused fructose specific PTS: IIA/HPr component), ManZ (Mannose-specific enzyme IID component of PTS), Dld (D-lactate dehydrogenase; FAD-dependent) involved in lactate oxidation to pyruvate and ArgI (Ornitihine carbamoyltransferase I) involved in arginine biosynthesis (Fig. 6b and 7b). Ribosomal proteins like RpsP (30S ribosomal protein S16), RpsO (30S ribosomal protein S15), RpsF (30S ribosomal protein S6), RplR (50S ribosomal protein L18), RplD (50s ribosomal protein L4), RplP (50S ribosomal protein L16), RpmE (50S ribosomal protein L31), RplB (50S ribosomal protein L2), YhbH (Predicted ribosome-associated, σ54 modulation protein) were found to be significantly down-regulated. This could be one of the reason for diminished growth of SCD00 compared to SSK42. It could also be possible that the given amount of ribosomal machinery is enough for the cell and it is in interest of the cell to direact the extra energy for metabolic reshuffling in order to consume maximum sugar up to best of its capabilities. YidA, a promiscuous sugar phosphatase that is able to hydrolyze α-D-glucose-1-phosphate, is downregulated by more than 2 log₂fold (32). Although, another sugar phosphatase, Agp is also found to be overexpressed by more than 2 log₂fold (mentioned above), there are reports that it has 2 times higher K_m (lower affinity) to its substrate as compared to YidA (32). AdhE (aldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase) was also found to be down-regulated by 2.5 log₂fold. ArcB (DNA binding response regulator in two component regulatory system with ArcB and ArcA) is found downregulated. ArcB along with ArcA mediates repression of many aerobic enzymes under anaerobic condition (33). In fact, the absorvation in the previous subsection that many enzymes envolved in TCA cycle and oxidative phosphorylation are upregulated in SCD00 could be due to downregulation of ArcB.

b) Comparison of protein profile of SCD78 with respect to SCD00

Upregulated proteins: Upon comparative proteomics analysis of strains SCD78 with respect to SCD00, a total of 45 proteins were found to be overexpressed (Fig. 6c and 6d). There are 10 proteins which were found to be significantly downregulated in SCD00 compared to SSK42 but are significantly overexpressed in strain SCD78 with respect to SCD00. These proteins include SelB, ArcB, FruB, PepA (aminopeptidase A), YicH (hypothetical protein), Rnr (RNase R), ManZ, SrmB (ATP dependent RNA helicase), YiiT (stress induced protein) and UvrA (excision nuclease A). These proteins may somehow help achieve strain SCD78 the growth advantage over SCD00 which the later lost to SSK42 due to deletion of ptsG. Two proteins, AldA (NAD⁺ dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase) and YjiM, were overexpressed in both the comparison groups signifying the positive correlation with ptsG deletion in strain SCD00 and adaptation in strain SCD78. Franchini et. al. also found AldA to be upregulated in their study on bacterial adaptation in glucose limiting continuous cutltures (34). MaeA (Malate dehydrogenase, NAD⁺- requiring; SfcA), UdhA (Soluble pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase) and MgsA (Methylglyoxal synthase) were found to be overexpressed by more than 3 log₂fold. The overexpression of MgsA and downregulation of GpsA appear to channel the DHAP towards methylglyoxal. Higher amount of methylglyoxal is an indication of accumulation of phosphorylated sugars inside the cell which explains the higher total sugar consumption phenotype of SCD78. Adaptation of SCD00 to generate strain SCD78 appear to equilibrate the reducing power inside the cell, which is exemplified by overexpression of UdhA and Ppk (polyphosphate kinase). UdhA is primarily responsible for reoxidation of NADPH in bacteria (35,36).

Other overexpressed proteins which also appear to be responsible for better growth profile of SCD78 include OpgD (osmoregulated periplasmic glucan synthesis protein) involved in the osmoregulation (40), LolA (Outer-membrane lipoprotein carrier protein), FruK (1-phosphofructokinase) which is essential for utilization of fructose as carbon source, PurF (amidophosphoribosyltransferase) which play critical role in purine de novo biosynthesis, and LplA (lipoate-protein ligase A) required for proper functioning of many crucial enzymes involved in oxidative metabolism using exogenous lipoate. Enzymes involved in the synthesis of amino acids, such as histidine, methionine, leucine, tyrosine and phenylalanine, are also found to be overexpressed in strain SCD78 as compared to SCD00. Downregulation of tryptophan operon repressor (TrpR) also indicate requirement for tryptophan biosynthesis.

Downregulated proteins: Proteins which were significantly overexpressed in SCD00 (as compared to SSK42) but are found to be downregulated in SCD78 (as compared to SCD00) include YqiC, PBP4 (Peptidoglycan DD endopeptidase; encoded by dacB) having both DD-endopeptidase and DD-carboxypeptidase activity and is involved in recycling and remodeling of gram-negative bacterial cell wall and proper separation of daughter cells (37–39), YdcL (predicted lipoprotein), YegU (predicted hydrolase), RbsB (D-ribose transporter subunit), RbsK (Ribokinase) and PspA (Regulatory protein for phage-shock-protein operon). RbsB and RbsK, belonging to RbsDACBK operon involved in ribose utilization, were found to be downregulated by more than 4 log₂fold. It appears that their upregulation due to ptsG deletion in SCD00 has been readjusted during the course of laboratory evolution in SCD78 since these proteins do not have direct role in either xylose or glucose utilization. Other downregulated proteins include PyrI (Aspartate carbamoyltransferase regulatory subunit), GpsA (NAD(P)H-dependent glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase), Lrp (DNA-binding transcriptional dual regulator), YghL (Predicted gluconate transport associated protein), Can (Carbonic anhydrase, YadF) and few other proteins (Table S2). The Can (β class carbonic anhydrase) interconverts CO₂ and biocarnonate. Its expression is particularly required during growth in air, where partial pressure of CO₂ is lower and the requirement of bicarbonate is higher in culture (40).

Carbon Catabolite Repression (CCR) is an intricate regulation system in bacteria, which manages the activity and expression of cellular enzymatic pools in a well-orchestrated manner for efficient sugar consumption and survival in various environmental conditions (41). Glucose-specific PTS enzyme EIIBC (encoded by ptsG) is the membrane-associated subunit of group translocation system of PEP-PTS (Phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system). EIIBC^Glc couples the vectorial translocation to the phosphorylation of the imported glucose molecules (42). It is the phosphorylated form of EIIA^Glc that can act as an adenylate cyclase activator (43–45). It also serves as activating signal for transporters and catabolic enzymes of secondary sugars. Therefore, we hypothesized that a deletion mutant of ptsG will have EIIA^Glc mostly in its phosphorylated form even in the presence of glucose in the culture medium since EIIBC^Glc is the primary acceptor of phosphate moiety from EIIA^Glc. All of the EIIA^Glc-℗ can then be used as an activating signal for transporters and catabolic enzymes of secondary sugars even in the presence of primary sugar glucose in the culture medium.

In this work, we used an ethanologenic strain SSK42 and made it CCR compromised by deleting ptsG encoding the glucose PTS transporter subunit (EIIBC^Glc). The strain SCD00 (ptsG deleted SSK42 strain) displayed significant co-utilization phenotype as compared to the parent strain in a sugar mixture containing 1% glucose and xylose each (Fig. 3b), but at lower sugar concentration glucose is consumed first followed by xylose with some degree of co-utilization still observed (Fig. 2d). The difference in the extent of co-utilization observed at higher and lower sugar concentrations implies that CCR may still be active to some extent even after the deletion of ptsG. Also, there could be cognate transporters that can potentially transport the xylose non-specifically at higher sugar concentration or both the sugars can simply diffuse through the membrane inside the cell along the concentration gradient when present at sufficiently higher concentration. Due to the higher degree of co-utilization observed in strain SCD00, we wished to improve its slower growth to further increase the total sugar consumption in a sugar mixture via the adaptive laboratory evolution strategy.

The strain SCD78, which has undergone approximately 78 generations in ALE on xylose, displays significant co-utilization at higher as well as lower sugar concentration as opposed to un-evolved strain SCD00, which only exhibit significant co-utilization at higher sugar concentration, i.e., 1% glucose and xylose each. Although SCD78 has its glucose consumption delayed by 3 hr compared to un-evolved strain SCD00 in Hungate tube, its xylose consumption has increased by the same duration ( Fig. 2d and 5a). Hence, it can consume total sugar faster than sequential sugars utilizer at low sugar concentrations. The strain SSK42 was earlier evolved on both glucose and xylose media for several generations and maintained on AM1 medium supplemented with xylose only (22) which could explain the rapid switch to xylose consumption after glucose and higher biomass generation. It is also worth noting that there is no significant change in the acetate production profiles of strain SCD78 as compared to the un-evolved control strain at bioreactor level however, there seems an increase in succinate production in SCD78 because no succinate was detected in SCD00 (Supplementary Fig. S3). It is interesting as frdA, which code for fumarate reductase responsible for conversion of fumarate to succinate under anaerobic condition, has been deleted in the SSK42 strain. It may indicate activation of alternative pathway for succinate production perhaps due to the need for NAD⁺ regeneration. Succinate is also produced from succinic semialdehyde (SSA) via the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) shunt via glutamate. Under conditions of low oxygen, succinate can also accumulate due to reversed action of SDH. Considering that we observed overexpression of succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (NAD-linked AldA) in SCD78 in our proteomic studies, both these pathways are possible for succinate production. Strain SCD78 produced 3 fold higher ethanol and biomass as compared to the control, with an ethanol yield of 84.35 ± 2.73% of the theoretical maximum limit as compared to the control (SCD00) which could only achieve an ethanol yield of approximately 55.8 ± 3.92% of the theoretical maximum limit.

The whole cell proteome comparison indicates that ptsG has led to higher flux through the TCA cycle and oxidative phosphorylation in strain SCD00 (Fig. 8). This could be due to the downregulation of the global regulator ArcB, which suppresses the aerobic enzymes expression under oxygen limiting condition. Overexpression of xylose consumption proteins and transaldolase B (TalB) in SCD00 strain also indicates higher PP pathway flux (Fig. 8). These observations along with recycling of aspartate and serine amino acids creates an impression of significant redistribution of metabolite flux to accommodate xylose sugars along with the glucose inside the cell. For generating the energy to sustain the cellular machinery there is an increased respiration capacity particularly NADH:quinone oxidoreductase I system. The downregulation of ABC transporters such as glutamate/aspartate, fructose and mannose ABC transporter could be to save the energy from getting wasted on transporters whose substrate is not even supplied in the culture medium. In absence of a working glucose-PTS system, overexpressed (6 logFC) methyl-galactoside ABC transporter could be responsible for glucose import.

After adaptation on xylose, the observed proteomics changes are not as drastic as for strain SCD00. It could be possible that the final phenotype is not only the result of differential protein expression but some genomic changes might be involved. Some minor but crucial changes which imparted the efficient sugar consumption and better growth profile for strain SCD78 are but not limited to - proper balancing the reducing power inside the cell by interconverting NADH and NADPH, also ATP and ADP, increase in purine de novo biosynthesis, increase in amino acid biosynthesis, overexpression of mannose ABC transporter and further reshaping of TCA cycle flux by overexpressed MaeA (malate dehydrogenase, NAD + requiring) (Fig. 8). Upregulation of ArcA/B regulation system along with better management of reducing power could be the factor responsible for higher sugar consumption, higher ethanol yield and better growth profile of strain SCD78. UdhA has been implicated in restoring the redox balance in the cell by catalyzing the electron transfer from NADPH to NADH (36). The over-expression of UdhA (approx. 3.1 log₂ fold) in strain SCD78 compared to SCD00 could be the consequence of the higher flux through pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) for the need of redox balance being met, i.e., converting excess NADPH to NADH. Higher PPP flux explains the glucose – xylose co-utilization and overall higher sugar consumption rate of strain SCD78 compared to SCD00. Higher sugar consumption requires higher sugar transport and a higher metabolism rate. If the downstream metabolism is slower than required, the phosphorylated sugars may build up inside the cell. Methylglyoxal production is generally considered as a strategy to avoid stress due to the accumulation of phosphorylated sugars inside the cell. Methylglyoxal is extremely toxic to cells, but its controlled expression is viewed as a defense mechanism against the accumulation of phosphorylated sugars inside the cell, which is also deleterious to cell survival (46). The formation of methylglyoxal at levels non-toxic to the cell channels the extra phosphorylated sugars, which would otherwise cause metabolic stress to the cell (46–48). Overexpression of MgsA in SCD78 signifies the presence of a higher amount of phosphorylated sugars as compared to SCD00 (Fig. 8), which to an extent explains the higher sugar consumption rate of strains SCD78. Kim et al. have demonstrated that overexpression of rbsDACBK operon (containing genes for the transport and initial-step metabolism of D-ribose) on multicopy plasmids results in cell death after ribose addition to the media due to methylglyoxal production at lethal levels (49). In line with that observation, we found approximately four log₂fold downregulation of RbsK and RbsB, although MgsA is still overexpressed by more than three log₂fold. It is to be noted that we have not added any external ribose to the culture media. Whether methylglyoxal production is helpful or not is yet to be determined in our case. However, Ingram et al. have already shown that the deletion of MgsA imparts the glucose-xylose co-utilization behavior in a recombinant E.coli strain expressing Zymomonas mobilis ethanol pathway (pdc, adhA, and adhB) (50). The deletion of mgsA can be explored to further improve the ethanol production in strain SCD78.

In conclusion, we found that deletion of ptsG gene can severly impact glucose utilization but pave the way for xylose utulization. Impact of deletion was much more pronounced on the wild type strain E. coli B as compared to the engineered and evolved ethanologenic strain SSK42. Adaptive evolution on xylose as the only sugar, was found to be a helpful strategy to develop a glucose-xylose co-utilizing strain in a minimal media. Finally, the proteomic studies of the engineered and evolved strains provided insights into the phenotypic changes that led to development of a successful co-utilizing strain.

Culture media

All the growth and phenotype determination studies were done in AM1 minimal medium supplemented with a glucose and/or xylose as mentioned in the result section. Composition of AM1 minimal media is as follows: (NH₄)₂HPO₄ − 19.92 mM, NH₄H₂PO₄ − 7.56 mM, KCl − 2.0 mM, MgSO₄.7H₂O − 1.5 mM, betaine HCl − 1.00 mM, FeCl₃.6H₂O − 8.88 µM, CoCl₂.6H₂O − 1.26 µM, CuCl₂.2H₂O − 0.88 µM, ZnCl₂ − 2.20 µM, Na₂MoO₄.2H₂O − 1.24 µM, H₃BO₃ − 1.21 µM, MnCl₂.4H₂O − 2.50 µM and CaCl₂.2H₂O − 1.36 µM (51). For maintaining the cultures on solid media plate, AM1 agar plates containing 20 g/l xylose as carbon source were used. All the strains used in this study were maintained on AM1 agar plates except during phage mediated transduction and regeneration after transformation. In those cases, the associated protocols were followed or LB medium plates with appropriate antibiotic were used. All chemicals used were of analytical grade.

Bacterial strains

Earlier, our group reported the development of an ethanologenic strain named SSK42 through Adaptive Laboratory Evolution (ALE) (22). This strain is a derivative of E.coli B strain. The strain SSK42 has ldhA, frdA and pflB genes deleted and the promoter of pdh operon is replaced with that of gapA gene for constitutive expression in microaerobic conditions. In this study, we further deleted ptsG gene from SSK42 by phage mediated transduction method using the single gene keio knockout strain (JW1087) from CGSC (Yale University, USA), as donor strain and confirmed the knockout on agarose gel electrophoresis after PCR amplification. The strain SCD00 was then adapted (as mentioned elsewhere) to generate strain SCD78, where numbers following the letters denotes the number of doublings the strains have undergone to reach the current status. All the strains used in this study are mentioned in Table 3.

Table 3

Strains used in the study
S.No.	Strain	Description	Reference
1	E.coli B	Wild type	CGSC Strain: 2507
2	E.coli B ΔptsG	E.coli B with EIIBC component of PTS deleted	This study
3	SSK42	E.coli B ΔldhA ΔfrdA ΔpflB ΔPDH promoter : : gapA gene promoter	(22)
4	SCD00	SSK42 with EIIBC component of PTS deleted	This study
5	SCD78	SSK42 ΔptsG; adapted on xylose	This study

Hungate tube culture

Screwcap Hungate tubes of capacity 18 ml with the working volume of the culture as 10 ml were used in the study. After inoculation, the tubes were tightly capped and incubated at 37˚C on a test tube rotator rotating the tubes by 360˚ vertically at 25–30 rpm.

Adaptive Laboratory Evolution (ALE) experiment

All adaptation related work was done in AM1 minimal medium (solid as well as liquid). StrainSCD00 was evolved using a combination of adaptation steps, which are as follows-

Strain was evolved in Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) at a very slow dilution rate, limited by sugar concentration. The Applikon 500 ml capacity bioreactor was used for the purpose with working volume being 300 ml. The air is supplied only in the headspace at 0.03–0.04 lpm to keep micro-aerobic conditions in the bioreactor. Agitation was done using Rushton type impellers at 300 rpm. The pH did not vary much during the fermentation as it remained near the initial value of pH 6.8, because fresh medium is continuously added to the reactor. Xylose was used as sole carbon at 1.0 g/l in the feed. The CSTR was kept running for 7 days at a dilution rate of 0.01 hr^− 1. Sample was obtained from the CSTR after 7 days and stored in the form of glycerol stock at -80 ˚C and the strains was named SCD00_ada. Later, the strain SCD00_ada was passaged on AM1 agar plates (20 g/L xylose) for 10 days and then adapted in Hungate tubes containing AM1 medium supplemented with 2 g/l of xylose. For first 14 days of adaptation in hungate tubes, whole biomass from previous day was added to fresh media each day (xylose concentration increased to 4 g/L on 8th day onwards). For next 27 days, only the culture volume equivalent to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.1 from previous day culture was added to fresh media every day. After neglecting the generations passed on AM1 agar plates, whole duration of adaptation starting with CSTR resulted in approximately 78 generations of the culture. Hence, the strain obtained was named SCD78.

Analytical Assays

Sugars (glucose and xylose) and metabolite – acetic acid, succinic acid, lactic acid and ethanol concentrations were determined using HPLC (Schimazdu) connected with Aminex HPX 87H (300 × 7.8 mm) column and RI detector. The column temperature was maintained at 40 ˚C and 4 mM H₂SO₄ was used as mobile phase at 0.3 ml/min flow rate. Samples were drawn at required time points from bioreactor and immediately filtered through 0.2 µm syringe filters. If required, the appropriate dilutions of filtered samples were prepared in 4 mM H₂SO₄ and 10 µl were injected into HPLC. The quantification of each metabolite was done using reference standards of concentration 1 g/l obtained from Absolute Standards, USA. Culture growth was determined by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) using spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare).

Bioreactor studies

Bioreactor cultivation studies were performed in multivessel fermenter assembly (Multifors from Infors, USA). Each vessel has 500 ml volumetric capacity. For cultivation, the culture was first passaged on AM1 medium agar plates supplemented with 20 g/l xylose as sole carbon source for at least three passages. It was followed by primary culture in Hungate tube with 10 ml AM1 medium supplemented with 20 g/l xylose, incubated at 37˚C at 25 rpm for 12–18 hrs. This tube culture was then used to inoculate the primary fermenter by adding all the tube culture to the fermenter. Primary fermenter was done in 10 g/l of xylose as sole carbon source in 300 ml of culture volume. Primary fermenter was allowed to grow overnight or till the culture reaches an OD₆₀₀ of approx. 2.0. Then, the final secondary reactor was inoculated with an appropriate culture volume from primary fermenter after washing the inoculum with fresh media by pelleting at 4500 rpm for 5 min in a tabletop centrifuge at room temperature. Starting OD₆₀₀ was kept at 0.1 in the final reactor. This reactor had a mixture of glucose and xylose at 10 g/l each as carbon sources. Kanamycin was used wherever necessary at 50 mg/L concentration. Fermenter was maintained at 37 ˚C prior to the inoculation. Primary as well as secondary fermenter cultivation was done at 37 ˚C at 300 impeller rpm. Air was only supplied in headspace at 0.03–0.04 Lpm (liter per minute). Sampling was done at required time points using Supersafe autosamplers supplied with one way valve to prevent accidental contamination of the culture. The samples were immediately filtered through 0.2µm syringe filters and analyzed through HPLC for metabolite and sugars or stored at -20˚C. Also, approx. 1 ml of sample was used to determine the growth by checking the optical density at 600 nm.

Whole cell proteomics

Strains SSK42, SCD00 and SCD78 were grown in bioreactor in presence of sugar mixture comprising of glucose and xylose (10 g/l each sugar) with same strategy as mentioned in the above section. Cultures were grown until early to mid-log phase of growth (OD₆₀₀ of 0.3 to 0.8) which was achieved in 6 to 11 hr. Culture was immediately centrifuged and pellet collected at 4˚C. The pellet was washed twice with cold MQ water and re-suspended in sonication buffer. The sonication buffer included Triton X-100 (1% v/v), sodium chloride (150mM), Tris-HCl pH-7.4 (50mM), EDTA (1mM), PMSF (1mm), Lysozyme (1mg/ml), 1,4-dithiothreitol (1mM) and Phos-stop tablets (anti phosphatases) from Pierce. Cell suspension equivalent to an OD₆₀₀ of 75 to 100 was taken in a pyrex tube and volume was increased to 5 ml (final OD₆₀₀ – 15 to 20) with cold sonication buffer. Culture was maintained on ice all time. Sonication was performed for 3 min with 3 sec on / 5 sec off cycle at 20% amplitude. After effective lysis, lysate was centrifuged at 12000g for 10 min at 4 ˚C in a table top centrifuge and supernatant was collected in Eppendorf tubes. Protein content was determined using BCA kit (G-Biosciences) following the manufacturer’s instruction. A total 50 µg protein was taken per reaction to proceed further for reduction, alkylation and digestion. Appropriate volume of protein sample (lysate supernatant) was diluted with urea (10 M in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution) to a final volume of 150 µl. DTT was added to a final concentration of 10 mM and gently mixed and incubated at 56 ˚C for 45 min. Then, iodoacetamide (200 mM stock in 50mM ammonium bicarbonate) was added to 50 mM final concentration, gently mixed and incubated at room temperature in dark for 45 min. DTT (30 mM final concentration) was added again and incubated at room temperature in dark for 45 min to consume any unreacted iodoacetamide. Calcium chloride (1 mM in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate solution) was added to the reaction to reduce the urea concentration to < 0.5M. Protein solution was then subjected to trypsin digestion. Trypsin from Pierce was used for the purpose, in a 1:50 (w/w trypsin: protein) ratio as suggested by the manufacturer and reaction content was incubated at 37˚C overnight. Two drops of concentrated formic acid were added to lower the reaction pH and stop the trypsin reaction. C18 columns from Pierce were used for sample cleanup before being analyzed on mass spectrometer (Orbitrap Fusion™ Lumos™ from ThermoFisher Scientific).

Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable.

Consent for publication: Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials: The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (52) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD033577 and 10.6019/PXD033577.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding: Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India (Grant no. BT/PR/Centre/03/2011-Phase II).

Authors' contribution: CD and SSY designed this study. CD performed the experiments. CD and SSY analyzed the data. CD and SSY wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments: CD acknowledges the generous financial support via Senior Research Fellowship from Department of Biotechnology (DBT).

Jeswani HK, Chilvers A, Azapagic A. Environmental sustainability of biofuels: a review. Proc R Soc A. 2020 Nov;476(2243).
Hassan SS, Williams GA, Jaiswal AK. Emerging technologies for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2018 Aug;262:310–8.
Kumar AK, Sharma S. Recent updates on different methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks: a review. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2017 Dec;4(1).
Menon V, Rao M. Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: Biofuels, platform chemicals & biorefinery concept. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2012;38(4):522–50.
Esquivel-Hernández DA, García-Pérez JS, López-Pacheco IY, Iqbal HMN, Parra-Saldívar R. Resource recovery of lignocellulosic biomass waste into lactic acid - Trends to sustain cleaner production. J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan;301.
Pratto B, Chandgude V, de Sousa R, Cruz AJG, Bankar S. Biobutanol production from sugarcane straw: Defining optimal biomass loading for improved ABE fermentation. Ind Crops Prod. 2020 Jun;148:112265.
Kawaguchi H, Takada K, Elkasaby T, Pangestu R, Toyoshima M, Kahar P, et al. Recent advances in lignocellulosic biomass white biotechnology for bioplastics. Bioresour Technol. 2022 Jan;344(Pt B).
Mazzoli R. Metabolic engineering strategies for consolidated production of lactic acid from lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2020 Jan;67(1):61–72.
Thygesen A, Tsapekos P, Alvarado-Morales M, Angelidaki I. Valorization of municipal organic waste into purified lactic acid. Bioresour Technol. 2021 Dec;342.
Narisetty V, Parhi P, Mohan B, Hakkim Hazeena S, Naresh Kumar A, Gullón B, et al. Valorization of renewable resources to functional oligosaccharides: Recent trends and future prospective. Bioresour Technol. 2022 Feb;346:126590.
Sànchez Nogué V, Karhumaa K. Xylose fermentation as a challenge for commercialization of lignocellulosic fuels and chemicals.
Alterthum F, Ingram LO. Efficient ethanol production from glucose, lactose, and xylose by recombinant Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989;55(8):1943–8.
Kim JH, Block DE, Mills DA. Simultaneous consumption of pentose and hexose sugars: an optimal microbial phenotype for efficient fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Nov;88(5):1077.
P G, P H, A E, VJ M, R M. Novel approach to engineer strains for simultaneous sugar utilization. Metab Eng. 2013;20:63–72.
Apel AR, Ouellet M, Szmidt-Middleton H, Keasling JD, Mukhopadhyay A. Evolved hexose transporter enhances xylose uptake and glucose/xylose co-utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep. 2016 Jan;6.
Wang M, Yu C, Zhao H. Directed evolution of xylose specific transporters to facilitate glucose-xylose co-utilization. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016 Mar;113(3):484–91.
Nichols NN, Dien BS, Bothast RJ. Use of catabolite repression mutants for fermentation of sugar mixtures to ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;56(1–2):120–5.
Lu H, Zhao X, Wang Y, Ding X, Wang J, Garza E, et al. Enhancement of D-lactic acid production from a mixed glucose and xylose substrate by the Escherichia coli strain JH15 devoid of the glucose effect. BMC Biotechnol. 2016 Feb;16(1).
Li F-F, Zhao Y, Li B-Z, Qiao J-J, Zhao G-R. Engineering Escherichia coli for production of 4-hydroxymandelic acid using glucose–xylose mixture. Microb Cell Fact. 2016 May;15(1).
Nichols NN, Dien BS, Bothast RJ. Use of catabolite repression mutants for fermentation of sugar mixtures to ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2001 561. 2001;56(1):120–5.
Munjal N, Mattam AJ, Pramanik D, Srivastava PS, Yazdani SS. Modulation of endogenous pathways enhances bioethanol yield and productivity in Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:1–12.
Jilani SB, Venigalla SSK, Mattam AJ, Dev C, Yazdani SS. Improvement in ethanol productivity of engineered E. coli strain SSY13 in defined medium via adaptive evolution. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;44(9):1375–84.
Loiseau L, Fyfe C, Aussel L, Chehade MH, Hernández SB, Faivre B, et al. The UbiK protein is an accessory factor necessary for bacterial ubiquinone (UQ) biosynthesis and forms a complex with the UQ biogenesis factor UbiJ. J Biol Chem. 2017 Jul;292(28):11937–50.
Schubert C, Zedler S, Strecker A, Unden G. L-Aspartate as a high-quality nitrogen source in Escherichia coli: Regulation of L-aspartase by the nitrogen regulatory system and interaction of L-aspartase with GlnB. Mol Microbiol. 2021 Apr;115(4):526–38.
Gosset G. Improvement of Escherichia coli production strains by modification of the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system. Microb Cell Fact. 2005 May;4(1):1–11.
Wick LM, Quadroni M, Egli T. Short- and long-term changes in proteome composition and kinetic properties in a culture of Escherichia coli during transition from glucose-excess to glucose-limited growth conditions in continuous culture and vice versa. Environ Microbiol. 2001;3(9):588–99.
Kao KC, Tran LM, Liao JC. A Global Regulatory Role of Gluconeogenic Genes in Escherichia coli Revealed by Transcriptome Network Analysis. J Biol Chem. 2005 Oct;280(43):36079–87.
Novotny MJ, Frederickson WL, Waygood EB, Saier MH. Allosteric regulation of glycerol kinase by enzyme IIIglc of the phosphotransferase system in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1985;162(2):810–6.
De Boer M, Broekhuizen CP, Postma PW. Regulation of glycerol kinase by enzyme IIIGlc of the phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system. J Bacteriol. 1986;167(1):393.
Desai KK, Miller BG. A metabolic bypass of the triosephosphate isomerase reaction. Biochemistry. 2008 Aug;47(31):7983–5.
Reed JL, Vo TD, Schilling CH, Palsson BO. An expanded genome-scale model of Escherichia coli K-12 (iJR904 GSM/GPR). Genome Biol. 2003;4(9):R54.
Kuznetsova E, Proudfoot M, Gonzalez CF, Brown G, Omelchenko M V., Borozan I, et al. Genome-wide Analysis of Substrate Specificities of the Escherichia coli Haloacid Dehalogenase-like Phosphatase Family. J Biol Chem. 2006 Nov;281(47):36149–61.
Iuchi S, Matsuda Z, Fujiwara T, Lin ECC. The arcB gene of Escherichia coli encodes a sensor-regulator protein for anaerobic repression of the arc modulon. Mol Microbiol. 1990;4(5):715–27.
Franchini AG, Egli Correspondence Thomas Egli egli T. Global gene expression in Escherichia coli K-12 during short-term and long-term adaptation to glucose-limited continuous culture conditions.
Sauer U, Canonaco F, Heri S, Perrenoud A, Fischer E. The soluble and membrane-bound transhydrogenases UdhA and PntAB have divergent functions in NADPH metabolism of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2004 Feb;279(8):6613–9.
Canonaco F, Hess TA, Heri S, Wang T, Szyperski T, Sauer U. Metabolic flux response to phosphoglucose isomerase knock-out in Escherichia coli and impact of overexpression of the soluble transhydrogenase UdhA.
Korat B, Mottl H, Keck W. Penicillin-binding protein 4 of Escherichia coli: molecular cloning of the dacB gene, controlled overexpression, and alterations in murein composition. Mol Microbiol. 1991;5(3):675–84.
Dik DA, Fisher JF, Mobashery S. Cell-Wall Recycling of the Gram-Negative Bacteria and the Nexus to Antibiotic Resistance. Chem Rev. 2018 Jun;118(12):5952–84.
Priyadarshini R, Popham DL, Young KD. Daughter cell separation by penicillin-binding proteins and peptidoglycan amidases in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2006 Aug;188(15):5345–55.
Merlin C, Masters M, McAteer S, Coulson A. Why Is Carbonic Anhydrase Essential to Escherichia coli? J Bacteriol. 2003 Nov;185(21):6415.
Deutscher J, Francke C, Postma PW. How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006 Dec;70(4):939–1031.
Meins$ M, Jenos P, Miillera D, Richter& WJ, Rosenbusch$ JP, Erni B. Cysteine phosphorylation of the glucose transporter of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(16):11604–9.
Reddy P, Kamireddi M. Modulation of Escherichia coli adenylyl cyclase activity by catalytic-site mutants of protein IIA(Glc) of the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(3):732–6.
Takahashi H, Inada T, Postma P, Aiba H. CRP down-regulates adenylate cyclase activity by reducing the level of phosphorylated IIA(Glc), the glucose-specific phosphotransferase protein, in Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1998;259(3):317–26.
Park YH, Lee BR, Seok YJ, Peterkofsky A. In vitro reconstitution of catabolite repression in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2006 Mar;281(10):6448–54.
Tötemeyer S, Booth NA, Nichols WW, Dunbar B, Booth IR. From famine to feast: the role of methylglyoxal production in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1998 Feb;27(3):553–62.
Boulanger EF, Sabag-Daigle A, Thirugnanasambantham P, Gopalan V, Ahmer BMM. Sugar-Phosphate Toxicities. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2021 Dec;85(4).
Fraenkel DG. The Accumulation of Glucose 6-Phosphate from Glucose and Its Effect in an Escherichia coli Mutant Lacking Phosphoglucose Isomerase and Glucose 6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 1968 Dec;243(24):6451–7.
Kim I, Kim E, Yoo S, Shin D, Min B, Song J, et al. Ribose utilization with an excess of mutarotase causes cell death due to accumulation of methylglyoxal. J Bacteriol. 2004 Nov;186(21):7229–35.
Yomano LP, York SW, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. Deletion of methylglyoxal synthase gene (mgsA) increased sugar co-metabolism in ethanol-producing Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 2009 Aug;31(9):1389–98.
Martinez A, Grabar TB, Shanmugam KT, Yomano LP, York SW, Ingram LO. Low salt medium for lactate and ethanol production by recombinant Escherichia coli B. Biotechnol Lett. 2007;29(3):397–404.
Perez-Riverol Y, Bai J, Bandla C, García-Seisdedos D, Hewapathirana S, Kamatchinathan S, et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 Jan;50(D1):D543.

No competing interests reported.

AdditionalFile1.docx
Additional file 1-Fig. S1: Sugar consumption, ethanol production and growth profile. Strain SSK42 (A) and SCD00 (B). Growth profile is represented by OD.600nm.Fig. S2: Sugar consumption, ethanol production and growth profile of strain SCD1200 that has been evolved on xylose and glucose in sequence. Sugars concentrations are plotted on left Y-axis while ethanol and optical density are plotted on right y-axis. Optical density represents the growth profile. Data represents the average of two biological replicates.Fig. S3: Metabolite production profiles of strains SCD00 and SCD78. Solid lines represents the strain SCD78 while dotted lines represents the SCD00 strain.Table S1: Differentially expressed protein in strain SCD00 vs SSK42. Only the protein withPValue lesser than 0.05 and log₂fold change of more than ± 2 are represented.Table S2: Differentially expressed protein in strain SCD78 vs SCD00. Only the protein with PValue lesser than 0.05 and log₂fold change of more than ± 2 are represented.

PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
13 Jun, 2022
Reviews received at journal
31 May, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
21 May, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
21 May, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
21 May, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
21 May, 2022
First submitted to journal
19 May, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Adaptation on xylose improves glucose-xylose co-utilization and ethanol production in a carbon catabolite repression (CCR) compromised ethanologenic strain

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Results

Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of the strain SCD00

a) Comparison of protein profiles of SCD00 with respect to SSK42

Discussion

Materials And Methods

Culture media

Bacterial strains

Hungate tube culture

Adaptive Laboratory Evolution (ALE) experiment

Bioreactor studies

Whole cell proteomics

Declarations

References

Competing Interests

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1