Response of motoneurons to axotomy
The right facial nerve of adult rats was transected at the stylomastoid foramen (Fig. 1a, top), and at a suitable time point each brain was recovered. For immunoblotting, the left facial nucleus (Ct) and right facial nucleus (Op) were cut out from the brainstem (Fig. 1a, bottom), and for immunohistochemistry coronal cryosections of the brainstem were prepared.
Using the brainstem sections taken at 5 d post-insult, we immunohistochemically examined the changes of ChAT and VAchT. The immunohistochemical images showed that ChAT-expressing and VAchT-expressing cells were considerably decreased in the axotFN compared to the control nucleus (ctFN) (Fig. 1b, c). The quantified results indicated that the levels of ChAT and VAchT in the axotFN were decreased to 0.22 ± 0.21 (Fig. 1e) and 0.25 ± 0.07 (Fig. 1f), respectively. These results suggested that the axotomy of the facial nerve led to the downregulation of functional molecules for motoneurons.
Next, to clarify whether the downregulations of ChAT and VAchT were caused by the death of injured motoneurons, we performed Nissl staining (Fig. 1d). The results showed that the number of living motoneurons in the ctFN (Ct) was 133 ± 5 cells and the number in the axotFN (Op) was 127 ± 16 cells (Fig. 1g), indicating that there were no significant changes in the numbers of living motoneurons between ctFN and axotFN at 5 d post-insult. Thus, these results indicated that axotomy of the facial nerve caused the reduction of ChAT and VAchT levels in the injured but surviving facial motoneurons.
Changes and localization of immediate early genes
c-Jun
The levels of c-Jun in the axotFN were examined by immunoblot. The quantified levels of c-Jun in the axotFN were 1.01 ± 0.32, 0.91 ± 0.15, 1.10 ± 0.15, 1.70 ± 0.06, 1.78 ± 0.59, 2.10 ± 0.64, 3.31 ± 0.64, 2.39 ± 0.30, and 1.38 ± 0.26, at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 h, and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 d post-insult, respectively (Fig. 2a, b). Thus, these results indicated that c-Jun in the axotFN was significantly increased from 12 h to 7 d.
To determine which cells increased the level of c-Jun in the axotFN, we immunohistochemically stained brainstem sections taken at 5 d post-insult. The results indicated that the number and the intensity of c-Jun expression were increased in axotFN compared to the ctFN (Fig. 2c). The dual staining with anti-ChAT antibody and anti-c-Jun antibody clarified that the c-Jun was present in the nucleus of anti-ChAT antibody-positive motoneurons (Fig. 2d). These results indicated that c-Jun was enhanced in injured facial motoneurons after the axotomy.
c-Fos
We then analyzed the changes of c-Fos in axotFN by immunoblotting (Fig. 3a). Quantified results of c-Fos in axotFN were 1.08 ± 0.03, 1.03 ± 0.06, 0.97 ± 0.14, 0.97 ± 0.14, 0.96 ± 0.14, 0.89 ± 0.15, 1.00 ± 0.02, 1.06 ± 0.11, 0.97 ± 0.15, at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 h, and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 d, respectively (Fig. 3b).
The immunohistochemical staining indicated that c-Fos was almost equally expressed in both nuclei, and there was no significant difference in c-Fos levels between the nuclei (Fig. 3c). Dual staining method indicated that c-Fos was localized in the nuclei of ChAT-expressing motoneurons (Fig. 3d). Collectively, these results indicated that c-Fos was homeostatically expressed in motoneurons, and the levels were not influenced by the transection.
Changes and Localization of CREB/ATF family
p-CREB and CREB
Immunoblotting indicated that the levels of p-CREB in axotFN were 0.18 ± 0.11, 0.22 ± 0.13, 0.14 ± 0.07, 0.22 ± 0.12, 0.12 ± 0.01, 0.10 ± 0.07, 0.08 ± 0.04, 0.20 ± 0.20, 0.20 ± 0.06 at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 h, and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 d, respectively (Fig. 4a, b, p-CREB). These results indicated that active CREB significantly decreased from 1.5 h to 14 d in the axotFN. The quantified levels of CREB in axotFN were 1.13 ± 0.11, 0.98 ± 0.06, 1.18 ± 0.13, 1.10 ± 0.19, 1.39 ± 0.07, 1.50 ± 0.13, 1.65 ± 0.17, 1.72 ± 0.21, 1.70 ± 0.19 at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 h, and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 d, respectively (Fig. 4a, b, CREB), indicating that the CREB was increased at a later stage (1–14 d post-insult).
The ABC immunohistochemical method showed that p-CREB was stained as large and small points in the ctFN, but the large points were lost and only small points remained in the axotFN (Fig. 4c, p-CREB). The number of small p-CREB-positive points was increased in the axotFN compared to the ctFN. CREB was stained as large points and small points in both nuclei, but there were more small points in the axotFN than the ctFN (Fig. 4c, CREB). Double staining method showed that the large CREB-positive points were consistent with the nuclei of ChAT-positive motoneurons (Fig. 4d), and the small CREB-positive points corresponded to the nuclei of CD11b-positive microglia (Fig. 4d). The CREB-staining was not entirely consistent with GFAP-positive astrocytes (Fig. 4d). Therefore, we can say that CREB is highly activated as p-CREB in normal motoneurons and microglia, but the active p-CREB would be markedly inactivated upon transection of motoneurons.
ATF2
Immunoblotting for ATF2 indicated the levels of ATF2 in the axotFN were 0.93 ± 0.09, 0.95 ± 0.28, 1.07 ± 0.18, 0.96 ± 0.08, 1.02 ± 0.08, 0.82 ± 0.05, 1.03 ± 0.23, 0.94 ± 0.10, 1.05 ± 0.14 at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 h, and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 d, respectively (Fig. 5a, b), implying that motoneuron axotomy did not significantly influence the level of ATF2 in the axotFN.
By the ABC method, ATF2 was observed as large and small points in both nuclei (Fig. 5c). However, we found that there was a greater number of small ATF2-positive points in the axotFN compared to the ctFN, although there was no significant difference in the number of large ATF2-positive points between the axotFN and ctFN (Fig. 5c). Dual staining with ChAT, CD11b, and GFAP antibodies indicated that the large ATF2-positive points were consistent with the nuclei of ChAT-positive motoneurons, and the small ATF2-positive points coincided with the nuclei of CD11b-positive microglia (Fig. 5d), but not those of GFAP-positive astrocytes (Fig. 5d). These results indicated that ATF2 in the motoneurons was not affected by axotomy, but the increase of ATF2 in microglia was associated with the proliferation occurring around injured motoneurons at this time.
Changes of MAPK in the axotomized facial nucleus
p-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2
As shown in Fig. 6a, p-ERK1/2 tended to decrease at 1–14 d in the axotFN. The quantification indicated that the levels of p-ERK1/2 in the axotFN were 0.89 ± 0.08, 1.06 ± 0.07, 1.02 ± 0.08, 0.74 ± 0.05, 0.65 ± 0.13, 0.43 ± 0.08, 0.41 ± 0.12, 0.38 ± 0.03, 0.33 ± 0.01 at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 h, and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 d, respectively (Fig. 6b, p-ERK1/2). These results indicated that p-ERK1/2 was significantly decreased from 12 h to 14 d on the axotFN. The levels of ERK1/2 in the axotFN were 1.01 ± 0.04, 1.02 ± 0.04, 1.02 ± 0.15, 1.01 ± 0.08, 1.31 ± 0.06, 1.31 ± 0.08, 1.55 ± 0.15, 1.82 ± 0.20, 1.44 ± 0.16 at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 h, and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 d, respectively, indicating that ERK1/2 increased at 1–14 d after injury (Fig. 6b, ERK1/2).
Immunohistochemical staining indicated that anti-p-ERK1/2 antibody stained many cells in the ctFN, but the staining of cells was weaker in the axotFN (Fig. 6c, p-ERK). On the other hand, the number of anti-ERK1/2 antibody-positive motoneurons in the axotFN was higher than that in ctFN (Fig. 6c, ERK1/2). The results of double staining indicated that the ERK1/2-expressing cells coincided with ChAT-expressing cells, suggesting that the ERK1/2-expressing cells were motoneurons (Fig. 6d).
p-JNK and JNK
Immunoblotting indicated that the levels of p-JNK in the axotFN were 1.06 ± 0.16, 0.74± 0.28, 0.55 ± 0.04, 0.69 ± 0.16, 0.63 ± 0.02, 0.51 ± 0.09, 0.52 ± 0.13, 0.50 ± 0.17, 0.32 ± 0.18 at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 h, and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 d, respectively (Fig. 7a, b, p-JNK). These results indicated that p-JNK1 was significantly decreased at 6 h to 14 d (Fig. 7B). On the other hand, the level of JNK in the axotFN were 1.03 ± 0.08, 1.06 ± 0.07, 1.02 ± 0.01, 1.07 ± 0.06, 0.70 ± 0.07, 0.66 ± 0.08, 0.70 ± 0. 05, 0.87 ± 0.10, 0.85 ± 0.12 at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 h, and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 d, respectively (Fig. 7a, b, JNK), indicating that JNK in the axotFN was slightly but significantly decreased at 1–5 d.
In immunohistochemical staining, we could see many p-JNK-expressing large structures in the ctFN, but the number of such structures was decreased in the axotFN (Fig. 7c). Dual staining method demonstrated that p-JNK-expressing structures were localized in ChAT-expressing motoneurons (Fig. 7d). These results indicated that JNK1/2 was normally expressed in motoneurons and the levels transiently decreased at 1–5 d post-insult when motoneurons were transected. Most of the p-JNK in the facial motoneurons was p-JNK1, rather than p-JNK2, and the levels were significantly declined at 6 h to 14 d post-insult (Fig. 7a, b).
p-p38 and p38
Finally, we analyzed the changes of p-p38 and p38 in the axotFN (Fig. 8a). Immunoblotting indicated that the levels of p-p38 in the axotFN were 0.79 ± 0.18, 0.43 ± 0.04, 0.49 ± 0.13, 0.64 ± 0.21, 1.36 ± 0.21, 1.65 ± 0.25, 2.21 ± 0.30, 4.11 ± 0.60, 3.40 ± 0.71 at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 h, and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 d, respectively (Fig. 8b, p-p38). These results indicated that p-p38 was significantly decreased from 3 h to 12 h after injury, but then significantly increased from 1 d to 14 d. On the other hand, the levels of p38 in the axotFN were 1.15 ± 0.18, 1.10 ± 0.11, 0.99 ± 0.12, 1.08 ± 0.06, 1.51 ± 0.30, 1.90 ± 0.15, 2.36 ± 0. 17, 1.90 ± 0.07, 1.51 ± 0.08 at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 h, and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 d, respectively (Fig. 8b, p38), indicating that p38 increased significantly from 3 to 14 d post-insult.
The immunohistochemical method indicated that p-p38-positive small cells were enhanced in the axotFN (Fig. 8c, p-p38). On the other hand, anti-p38 antibody stained both large cells and small cells in the ctFN (Fig. 8c, p38), and the number of anti-p38 antibody-positive cells was enhanced in the axotFN (Fig. 8c, p38). Dual staining with anti-p-p38/anti-CD11b antibodies clarified that p-p38 was colocalized with CD11b-expressing microglia (Fig. 9a). On the other hand, dual staining with anti-p-p38/anti-GFAP antibodies indicated that p-p38 staining was not colocalized with GFAP-staining (Fig. 9a).
We next examined which cell types expressed p38 by using double staining method. p38 was detected in both large cells and small cells (Fig. 9b). The p38-expressing large cells coincided with ChAT-expressing cells (Fig. 9b, top panels), suggesting that p38 was present in motoneurons. On the other hand, p38-expressing small cells coincided with CD11b-positive cells (Fig. 9b, medium panels), but not GFAP-positive cells (Fig. 9b, bottom panels), suggesting that p-38-expressing small cells were microglia.
Phosphorylation of p38 and CREB in M-CSF-stimulated microglia
Detection of p-p38 and p-CREB in microglia in the axotFN allowed us to predict that p38 and CREB were phosphorylated by stimulus with microglial mitogen M-CSF. Thus, we examined in vitro whether p38 and CREB in microglia are activated by M-CSF. Immunoblotting showed that p38 and CREB were rapidly phosphorylated by stimulus with M-CSF (Fig. 10a, b). In addition, MSK1 was found to be phosphorylated in M-CSF-stimulated microglia (Fig. 10c). The amounts of b-actin were constant (Fig. 10d). These results strongly suggest that p38, CREB and MSK1 are phosphorylated in proliferating microglia in vivo.