Crizotinib combined with bronchoscopic interventional treatment in ALK-positive Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of left main stem bronchus: a case report

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1679421/v1

Abstract

Background Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT), also known as an inflammatory pseudotumor, is a unique type of intermediate soft tissue tumor that commonly occurred in the lung. Its unclear etiology and cellular activity brought about the confusion not only in naming of it, but also in diagnosis and treatment.

Case presentation We reported the case of an 18-year-old male student who suffered from shortness of breath, chest tightness and chest pain. Chest computed tomography scan showed a spherical neoplasm blocking left main stem bronchus. After fiberoptic bronchoscopy procedure, the results of histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis indicated an IMT. The targeted next generation sequencing based genomic profiling of the tumor using formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissue was performed and a EML4-ALK fusion was detected. The patient began to receive Crizotinib, a ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, at a dose of 250 mg twice daily orally. The patient has recovered well after the operation, and no recurrence or metastasis has been found after 12 months’ follow-up.

Conclusion By means of the diagnosis and treatment of this case, the characteristics and therapies of IMT are illustrated. In addition, it also provides a reference for the therapeutic strategy of IMT in the future.

Background

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is an uncommon mesenchymal tumor, that distinguished by prominent myofibroblastic spindle cells, with dense infiltration of plasma cells, lymphocytes, and eosinophils [1]. In the past, lack of sufficient research resulted in non-standard naming, including inflammatory pseudotumor, plasma cell granulomas, xanthogranuloma, fibrous histiocytoma, inflammatory fibrosarcoma and fibroxanthoma, of which inflammatory pseudotumor is most common used, however [2].

Until nearly two decades ago, IMT was defined as a low-grade malignant tumor, instead of benign tumor-like lesions that many scholars thought it as before. In spite of unclear etiology and natural course, IMT is observed to have biologic characteristics of invasion and metastasis. Lung is the most common location of IMT, however, no obvious clinical manifestations and atypical characters of radiologic signs make it difficult to early diagnose unless the pathological histology is performed [3].

In this paper, we report a case of IMT originating in the left main stem bronchus (LMB), aiming to review the imaging features, histopathological characteristics, treatment strategies and prognosis of this uncommon tumor. We present the following case in accordance with the CARE reporting checklist.

Case Presentation

The case was an 18-year-old male student with shortness of breath, chest pain and chest tightness for 1 day. The patient reported a history of smoking 20 cigarettes one day, on average, for one year.

Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed that the lesion with abundant blood supply within the LMB, measuring 14×9 mm in size (Fig. 1). Pulmonary function testing revealed a restrictive pattern with reduced vital capacity to 1.44 L. Super selective angiography showed the tortuosity of branches of bronchial arterial, and the mass in blood supply area stained with contrast agent. In order to dismiss intraoperative bleeding and shrink the lesion, the supper selective bronchial arterial embolization was performed. Subsequent electron bronchoscopy under general anesthesia showed that the opening of the LMB was normal, and a spherical soft tissue mass was observed blocking the lumen about 3 cm from the carina (Fig. 2). The tissue mass was removed out through endoscopic polypectomy with the snare and alligator biopsy forceps.

Pathological diagnosis revealed that the IMT with low-grade malignancy of LMB may be possible. Under the epithelial mucosa of the respiratory tract, there were lots of spindle cell tumors consisting with scattered lymphocytes and foamy histiocytes cells infiltrated (Fig. 3). Immunohistochemical staining results as follows: EMA (-), Vim (+), SMA (-), S-100 (-), CD34 (-), STAT-6 (-), CD99 (-), bcl-2 (-), Ki67 (5%+), SOX-10 (-), ALK (+), Desmin (-), p63 (-), FLI-1 (-), HMB45 (-) and Myo-D1 (-) (Fig. 4). The targeted next generation sequencing (NGS)-based genomic profiling of his tumor using formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue was performed and a EML4-ALK fusion was detected. The patient began to receive Crizotinib, a ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, at a dose of 250 mg twice daily orally. The patient has recovered well after the operation, and no recurrence or metastasis has been found after 12 months’ follow-up.

Discussion

IMT, formerly referred to as one of inflammatory pseudo-tumours, is an infrequent disease, initially reported as a benign lung tumor in 1939. According to the published literatures, lung is the most common site of IMT, accounting for 0.7% of all lung tumors. Moreover, IMT mostly occurs in the lung parenchyma and rarely involve the bronchus. The case of tracheobronchial IMT is relatively rare.

Aetiology of IMT

Currently, it is not absolutely clear about the aetiology and nosogenesis of IMT. It is regarded as a result of the anomalous reparative processes due to the stimulations of inflammation, trauma, surgical injury, human herpesvirus-8 [6, 7], Epstein-Barr virus infection [8, 9] etc. leading to proliferation and differentiation of myofibroblasts being the major elements for the composition of IMT.

Since many prior studies have shown that IMT is closely related to the rearrangement of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene on 2p23 chromosome, the positivity of ALK expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) contributes to the diagnosis of the disease [10]. Lovl et al. [11] analyzed 37 cases of IMT, 70% of which were ALK IHC positive. Up to now, genes fused with ALK in IMT demonstrated contain SEC31A, TPM3, TPM4, TFG, CLTC, FN1, CARS, LMNA and PRKAR1A. Abnormal structural recombination of the ALK gene can result in aberrant activation and expression of ALK, which induces the formation of a chimeric fusion protein, leading to the proliferation of myofibroblasts and hence promote tumorigenesis, progression and metastasis of IMT. Additionally, other genetic abnormalities are gradually confirmed, such as YWHAE-ROS1, TFG-ROS1 and NAB2-PDGFRβ [1113].

Clinical and imaging features in IMT

The clinical manifestations of IMT are lack of specificity, depending on the site of origin and the effects of the mass. Most of pulmonary IMT might be asymptomatic due to peripheral tendency and slow growing, whereas, endobronchial and aggressive/larger parenchymal lesions can cause different symptoms, varying from chest pain, chest tightness, cough, wheeze, hemoptysis and dyspnea to pyrexia, weight loss and general fatigue. Of note, endobronchial lesions may cause neoplastic bronchiostenosi, leading to obstructive pneumonia with cough, sputum production, pyrexia and so on.

The imaging characteristics of IMT are often nonspecific. Chest X-ray is of limited help in confirmation for IMT owing to it poor sensitivity, though occasionally IMT can be detected as an incidental occurrence. The radiological findings of pulmonary IMT in plain chest CT scans commonly shows a soft tissue mass, with well-defined. After the administration of a contrast agent, the lesions present various degrees of enhancement or calcified regions [14]. Invasion to pulmonary hilar structures very often arises from central lesions, whereas, peripheral lesions tend to intrude into pleura. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered to better obtain inner IMT tumor tissue and identify the lesion margin and the relationship of the lesion with vital surrounding organs and tissue structures. However, the application of MRI in pulmonary IMT is of limited, to a great extent, due to the pulmonary structural characteristics, hence few MRI findings have been reported so far. The lack of specificity on imaging features, as well as insufficient radiologic studies results in confusion about distinguishing it with rhabdomyosarcomas, lymphomas and teratomas [15].

Diagnosis of IMT

For diagnosis of IMT, histopathology is considered as the gold standard. The follow latest criteria are formulated by world health organization (WHO) to diagnose IMT [16]: (I) compact or loose fascicles of spindle cells with a predominant infiltration of inflammation cells and a variable fibroid or mucoid stroma; (II) expression of ALK seen in up to 60% of cases. The desirable diagnostic criterion is ALK or other gene reassortments. On the basis of the distribution of myofibroblastic spindle cells, inflammatory cells, and infiltrating features, the pathological classifications of IMT are as follows: (I) a myxoid-vascular type, featuring a mass of immature neovascularization and mucus degeneration interstitial tissues with fascicles of spindle-shaped myofibroblasts and varying amounts of inflammatory cells; (II) a compact spindle cell type, featuring a large number of compact spindle cells with scattered inflammatory cells; and (III) a hypocellular fibrous type, featuring abundant collagen fibers with inclusion of the tumor cells. As is stated above, due to lack of specificity in clinical and imaging features, cytological, histological and immunohistochemical analysis is critical to diagnosis of the IMT.

Immunohistochemical analysis might be more beneficial to discriminate IMT and tumors with analogous histopathology, such as malignant fibrous histiocytoma, sarcomas, lymphomas and spindle cell carcinomas. The expression of ALK accounts for about 50% of cases of IMT, with the help of conventional IHC techniques [17]. Tan et al. [18] elucidate immunohistochemical findings of the 54 patients with IMT, that the positive rate of makers ALK, SMA and Vim were 44.4%, 88.9% and 87.0%. Of note, further studies on ALK IHC-negative cases showed next generation sequencing (NGS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and intercalated antibody-enhanced polymer (iAEP) methods may detect novel ALK fusions [11, 19, 20]. The progression of highly sensitive and dependable detection means of ALK expression and reassortments will be crucial to not only improve diagnostic accuracy but also guide therapeutic strategies and prognostic conditions.

Treatment of IMT

Complete surgical resection of the tumor is the preferred method for treatment of IMT. Also note that surgical strategy should be determined according to the patient’s general condition, size and location of the lesions. Since generally defined as a low-grade malignant tumor, the treatment of pulmonary IMT is similar to lung cancer. For larger lesions or high suspicion of malignant transformation, lobectomy with lymph node cleaning is recommended. As to smaller solitary pulmonary lesions, the specific surgical procedure should be determined based on the intraoperative frozen-section examination.

IMT involving the bronchus is even rarer. The case of the IMT of LMB by Privitera et al. [4] reported involved bronchial sleeve resection for complete removal of the lesion. Oztuna et al. [21] proposed that bronchoscopic resection is a viable alternative in cases of IMT restricted to the tracheobronchial tree. Our case showed that the IMT of LMB was removed out through endoscopic polypectomy with the snare and alligator biopsy forceps. Owing to ALK expression observed through IHC, the case presented in our study has been being treated with Crizotinib 250 mg orally once daily until now. As an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Crizotinib, targeting the ALK, ROS1 and MET tyrosine kinases, is well approved to induce clinically significant responses in non-small cell lung cancer [22, 23]. Additionally, there have been case reports proving that therapy of some cases of ALK-positive IMT with Crizotinib, especially those in which surgery is contraindicated and cases of unresectable lesions, multifocal disease, or postoperative recurrence, could effectively inhibit tumor growth and decrease tumor size [24]. Corticosteroids might be of benefit to children in cases of hilar and mediastinal invasion, yet generally not helpful to adults [5].

Prognosis of IMT

The current studies provide evidence that the tumor size and the quality of surgical resection are the major factor influencing prognosis of IMT. For solitary pulmonary nodules, complete surgical resection confers a favorable 5 and 10-year survival in these patients of 91% and 77.7%, respectively [1]. The tumor size of less than or equal 3 cm is correlated with improved survival [5]. Recurrence rates following complete surgical resection is only 2%, compared to 60% of incomplete resection. Recurrence may occur several years after the initial diagnosis, which underscores the necessity of long-term follow-up, especially those with incomplete resection. The probability of metastatic spread of IMT is less than 5%. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case that was treated with interventional bronchoscopic resection, followed by medical therapy with Crizotinib orally. The patient has been followed-up 12 months without recurrence or distant metastasis.

Conclusion

To sum up, IMT represents an exceedingly rare low-grade malignancy, which most frequently occurs in the lung. Involvement of the bronchus is an even more rare occurrence. Due to the lack of typical clinical manifestations or particular imaging characteristics, diagnosis of IMT primarily depends on histopathology. Although it is generally recommended to perform complete surgical procedures, the combination of endoscopic resection and small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor may be an appropriate oncologic procedure as for a completely endoluminal mass, as in this case.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Ethics Committee of the 961th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from patient's parents for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

None.

Authors' contributions

As the primary thoracic surgeon who treated the patient, ZP initiated and edited the manuscript. WCC reviewed literature and helped to prepare manuscript. LZC collected clinical data and the pathology images of the biopsy of the case. DMX conducted the follow-up of the case. XRX performed the gross examination of the case. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

To our research group at the Laboratory of Research and Evaluation on Life-Saving International for Combat Injury at Sea, who inspired our curiosity in this case.

References

  1. Sagar AES, Jimenez CA, Shannon VR. Clinical and histopathologic correlates and management strategies for inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the lung. a case series and review of the literature. Med Oncol 2018;35:102.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1161-0

  1. Zhang C, Li CJ, Zong WK, Xu ML, Fan GW. One case of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor - a case report. J Can Res Ther 2015;11, Suppl S1:131-3.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.163872

  1. Sagar AES, Jimenez CA, Shannon VR. Clinical and Histopathologic Correlates and Management Strategies for Inflammatory Myofibroblastic tumor of the lung. A case series and review of the literature. Med Oncol 2018;35:102.

http://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1161-0

  1. Privitera S, Hwang DM, Darling GE. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the left main stem bronchus. J Thorac Oncol 2006;1:726-8.

http://doi.org/10.1016/S1556-0864(15)30389-0

  1. Hammas N, Chbani L, Rami M, et al. A rare tumor of the lung: inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Diagn Pathol 2012;7:83.

http://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-7-83

  1. Gómez-Román JJ, Sánchez-Velasco P, Ocejo-Vinyals G, et al. Human Herpesvirus-8 Genes Are Expressed in Pulmonary Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor (Inflammatory Pseudotumor). Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:624-9.
  2. Slavotinek JP, Bourne AJ, Sage MR, Freeman JK. Inflammatory pseudotumour of the pancreas in a child. Pediatr Radiol 2000;30:801-3.

http://doi.org/10.1007/s002470000331

  1. Arber DA, Kamel OW, van de Rijn M, et al. Frequent presence of the Epstein-Barr virus in inflammatory pseudotumor. Hum Pathol 1995;26:1093-8.

http://doi.org/10.1016/0046-8177(95)90271-6

  1. Lewis JT, Gaffney RL, Casey MB, et al. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the spleen associated with a clonal Epstein-Barr virus genome. Case report and review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;120:56-61.

http://doi.org/10.1309/BUWN-MG5R-V4D0-9YYH

  1. Lawrence B, Perez-Atayde A, Hibbard MK, et al. TPM3-ALK and TPM4-ALK oncogenes in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Am J Pathol 2000;157:377-84.

http://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64550-6

  1. Lovly CM, Gupta A, Lipson D, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors harbor multiple potentially actionable kinase fusions. Cancer Discov 2014;4:889-95.

http://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0377

  1. Hornick JL, Sholl LM, Dal Cin P, et al. Expression of ROS1 predicts ROS1 gene rearrangement in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Mod Pathol 2015;28:732-9.

http://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2014.165

  1. Lopez-Nunez O, John I, Panasiti RN, et al. Infantile inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors: clinicopathological and molecular characterization of 12 cases. Mod Pathol 2020;33:576-90.

http://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0406-6

  1. Tan H, Wang B, Xiao H, et al. Radiologic and Clinicopathologic Findings of Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2017;41:90-7.

http://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000444

  1. Zhao J, Han D, Gao M, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the neck with thyroid invasion: a case report and literature review. Gland Surg 2020;9:1042-7.

http://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-355

  1. The WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO Classification of Tumours Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours, 5th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2020.
  2. Tothova Z, Wagner AJ. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-directed therapy in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Curr Opin Oncol 2012;24:409-13. http://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0b013e328354c155
  3. Tan H, Wang B, Xiao H, et al. Radiologic and Clinicopathologic Findings of Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2017;41:90-7.

http://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000444

  1. Takeuchi K, Soda M, Togashi Y, et al. Pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor expressing a novel fusion, PPFIBP1-ALK: reappraisal of anti-ALK immunohistochemistry as a tool for novel ALK fusion identification. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:3341-8.

http://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0063

  1. Siminovich M, Galluzzo L, López J, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the lung in children: anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) expression and clinico-pathological correlation. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2012;15:179-86.

http://doi.org/10.2350/11-10-1105-OA.1

  1. Oztuna F, Pehlivanlar M, Abul Y, et al. Adult inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the trachea: case report and literature review. Respir Care 2013;58:e72-6.

http://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02198

  1. Ou SH, Kwak EL, Siwak-Tapp C, et al. Activity of crizotinib (PF02341066), a dual mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, in a non-small cell lung cancer patient with de novo MET amplification. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:942-6.

http://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31821528d3

  1. Bergethon K, Shaw AT, Ou SH, et al. ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancers. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:863-70.

http://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6345

  1. Gaudichon J, Jeanne-Pasquier C, Deparis M, et al. Complete and Repeated Response of a Metastatic ALK-rearranged Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor to Crizotinib in a Teenage Girl. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2016;38:308-11.

http://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000000498