Exoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease: A retrospective single-center study on 388 patients

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1679800/v1

Abstract

Background

Microscopic or endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery represent the standard treatment for Cushing’s disease (CD). At our institution a new exoscopic approach was implemented. After proof of the general use for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery, the aim of this study was to compare the exoscopic 4K3D video microscope with the microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for patients with CD.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis on 388 patients with CD treated in our medical center via microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (MTS) between January 2008 and July 2019 or via exoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ExTS) between May 2019 and May 2021. Parameters investigated included histology, pre- and postoperative MRI with tumor size, pre- and postoperative ACTH and cortisol levels, duration of surgery, perioperative and postoperative complications as well as clinical outcome.

Results

Patients who underwent ExTS in CD experienced a lower incidence of SIADH/Diabetes insipidus (p = 0.0164), a higher rate of remission (p = 0.0422) and a shorter duration of surgery (p < 0.0001) compared to MTS. However, there was no significant difference regarding new postoperative pituitary insufficiency and intraoperative CSF space opening.

Conclusions

We found that ExTS had multiple benefits compared to MTS for tumor resection in case of CD. These results are in line with our previous publication on the general applicability of an exoscope in pituitary surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study proving the superiority of ExTS in CD. These results are promising, nevertheless further studies comparing exoscopic with the endoscopic approach are necessary to finally evaluate the utility of the new technique.

Introduction

Endonasal transsphenoidal surgery remains the standard treatment for Cushing’s disease (CD). The two main operative techniques, consist of microscopic (MTS) and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS). MTS has been the most popular surgical procedure for pituitary adenomas to date. However, in recent years the endoscopic approach has become increasingly popular, as it offers better image resolution with higher magnification and the opportunity for additional surgical exposure if necessary1. Moreover, the endoscopic technique was associated with shorter mean duration of surgery, lower rate of postoperative pituitary insufficiency and other postoperative complications such as diabetes insipidus, a higher incidence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks as well as higher remission rates compared to MTS 13. However, the data regarding postoperative remission rates are inconsistent, as some studies showed no benefit from ETS 46.

An exoscope is a new high-definition digital imaging system, which has recently been successfully implemented in different fields of neurosurgery such as neurovascular, tumor or peripheral nerve surgery and offers better maneuverability, ergonomics, and stereoscopic visualization in comparison to the standard microscope 7–11. First experiences with the exoscopic 4K 3D video microscope (Orbeye, Olympus) for transsphenoidal surgery from our center have already been reported 12. It was shown that among all pituitary surgeries the exoscopic technique seems to be advantageous compared to MTS. In the current study we aim to compare MTS to exoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ExTS) with respect to duration of surgery as well as complication and remission rates for the isolated cohort of patients with Cushing’s disease. The theory was, that this selected collective, comprising relatively small tumors, would make ExTS an ideal approach.

Methods

Patient selection

A total number of 388 patients after 418 transsphenoidal surgical procedures in the treatment of CD were retrospectively analyzed. Surgeries were performed either via MTS between January 2008 and July 2019 or via ExTS between May 2019 and May 2021. CD was defined according to the endocrine society guidelines 13. In unclear cases, central venous sampling like inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) or cavernous sinus sampling (CSS) was required.

Laboratory Studies

Serum cortisol, adreno-corticotropic hormone (ACTH), prolactin (PRL), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone or estrogen, growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and thyroid hormones (fT3 and fT4) were examined preoperatively one day prior to surgery and were drawn on postoperative days one and three as well as on varying postoperative days before discharge.

Radiological Evaluation

Focused sellar MRI exams were performed either in an outpatient setting or inpatient prior to surgery. Tumor size was measured in the preoperative MRI and then classified as micro- (< 1cm), macroadenoma (≥ 1cm and < 4cm) or giant tumor (≥ 4cm). Further, suprasellar, cavernous sinus, sphenoid sinus and clival invasion were evaluated. Preoperative intratumoral hemorrhage was also assessed.

Histological Examination

Intraoperative specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated, embedded in paraffin and then sectioned in 4µm slices according to standard lab protocols and underwent H & E staining as well as periodic acid–Schiff reaction staining. Immunohistochemistry for pituitary hormones (adreno-corticotropic hormone, somatotropic hormone, prolactin, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone); S100 protein; pancytokeratin (KL1 or Ca m 5.2); Tpit expression; mitotic marker phosphohistone-3 (PH3); proliferation marker Ki-67 (MIB-1); and accumulation of tumor suppressor protein p53 were performed using an automated staining protocol (Ventana BenchMark TX, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Tissue specimens were examined by senior physicians of the department of neuropathology at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.

Surgical Procedure

Surgeries were performed by a team of experienced neurosurgeons either via microscopic or exoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Both operative techniques have previously been described 12,14,15. Duration of surgery was defined as incision-suture time.

Statistical Analyses

Clinical data was acquired from the patients’ electronic files via systematic data search. Data is reported as means with standard deviations (SD) for continuous variables, and as frequencies for categorical variables. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed to determine normal distribution. Means were compared using the unpaired t-test when data distribution was normal, or by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test when variables were not normally distributed. For categorical analyses, a chi square test and Fisher’s exact test were used. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical tests and data visualization were performed in GraphPad Prism (Version 8.4.3).

Results

Demographic and Clinical Data

27 of 388 patients had to undergo two repeated surgeries (2 surgeries in 24/27 cases and three surgeries in 3/27 cases). There were 237 females (75.5%) in the MTS group and 58 females (78.4%) in the ExTS cohort. Mean age was 43.4 years (range; 6.3–80 years) and 41.5 years (range: 4.3–72 years), respectively. The MTS group comprised 193 microadenomas, 93 macroadenomas, and two giant tumors. 33 patients showed no visible tumor on MRI and tumor size in preoperative imaging was not available in 21 cases. Preoperative intratumoral hemorrhage occurred in four patients (1.2%). Primary surgeries amounted to 258; 82 patients had underwent prior surgery. Suprasellar invasion was found in 40, cavernous sinus invasion in 83, clival invasion in 5 and sphenoid sinus invasion in 13 cases, respectively.

The ExTS cohort encompassed 43 microadenomas, 20 macroadenomas, 12 patients without detectable tumor and 3 specimen in which tumor size was not available. Preoperative intratumoral hemorrhage was radiologically identified in one patient (1.3%). Sixty patients underwent primary surgery and 18 recurrence surgery. Tumor invasion was present in 23 cases with suprasellar invasion in 10, cavernous sinus invasion in 17, clival invasion in 2 and sphenoid sinus invasion in 3 cases, respectively.

All results are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Patients

Characteristic

MTS

ExTS

Female

237(75.5%)

58(78.4%)

Number of surgeries

340

78

Age in yrs(range)

43.4(6.3–80)

41.5(4.3–72)

Duration of follow-up in months(range)

32.5(0-137)

8.8(0–26)

Tumor size

   

Microadenoma

193

43

Mean tumor size in cm cor/sag/ax

0.47/0.45/0.42

0.59/0.56/0.45

Macroadenoma

91

20

Mean tumor size in cm cor/sag/ax

1.57/1.55/1.44

1.42/1.25/1.19

Giant tumor

2

0

Mean tumor size in cm cor/sag/ax

4.95/3.55/4.4

-

No tumor

33

12

No tumor size available

21

3

Overall mean tumor size in cm cor/sag/ax*

0.74/0.66/0.64

0.69/0.63/0.56

Preoperative intratumoral hemorrhage

4(1.2%)

1(1.3%)

Associated hyperprolactinemia with prolactin levels < 100ng/ml

6(1.8%)

1(1.3%)

Histopathological subgroups according to WHO 2017 Classification

   

Densely granulated corticotrophic adenoma

213

45

Sparsely granulated corticotrophic adenoma

81

12

Crooke’s cell adenoma

4

6

No tumor, Crooke cells

33

12

Adenoma - granulation histologically not specified

9

3

Invasiveness

110

23

Suprasellar invasion

40

10

Cavernous sinus invasion

83

17

Sphenoid sinus invasion

13

3

Clival invasion

5

2

Primary surgery

258(75.9%)

60(76.9%)

Repeated surgery

82(24.1%)

18(23.1%)

MTS = microscopic transsphenoidal surgery; ExTS = exoscopic transsphenoidal surgery; ax = axial, cm = centimeter; cor = coronal; sag = sagittal; yrs = years

Histological Analyses:

Histological examination after the 340 MTS procedures revealed 213 densely granulated corticotrophic adenomas, 81 sparsely granulated corticotrophic adenomas and 4 Crooke’s cell adenoma. In 9 cases the granularity pattern could not be specified. In 33 specimen no tumor could be detected in the histological examination.

Among the 78 patients operated via ExTS we diagnosed 45 densely granulated corticotrophic adenomas, 12 sparsely granulated corticotrophic adenomas and 6 Crooke’s cell adenomas according to WHO 2017 classification. In 3 cases of adenoma, the granulation pattern could not be evaluated. Twelve patients only presented with Crooke’s cells as a sign of hypercortisolemia without tumor.

Follow-up

All patients were scheduled for regular postoperative follow-up exams, which comprised of clinical, laboratory and MRI evaluation. The mean follow up period was 32.5 months (range: 0-137 months) for the MTS cohort and 8.8 months (range: 0–26) for the ExTS group. Ninety-two patients did not attend the recommended postoperative examination at our clinic. On follow-up, radiological and laboratory remission was achieved in 217/388? surgeries. Overall a higher remission rate was achieved after tumor resection via ExTS compared to MTS (81% vs. 66.3%, p = 0.422). Differences were observed after primary surgeries of both microadenoma (95.5% vs 83.7%, p = 0.2000) and macroadenoma (84.6% vs 62.7%, p = 0.1912) as well as for repeated surgery of macradenoma (25% vs 15.4%, p = 0.5384) and transsphenoidal surgery without histologically proven tumor (54.5% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.7120); however, these differences were not statistically significant. No difference regarding remission rates was observed for repeated surgery of microadenoma (50% vs 51.6%, p > 0.9999). Overall, higher remission rates were attained after resection of microadenoma compared to macroadenoma within both the ExTS and MTS groups. The complete comparison is presented in Table 2. For 3 patients, no clinical data was available.

Table 2

Results

Characteristic

MTS

ExTS

p-value

Microadenoma – First surgery

n = 155

n = 33

 

Mean(± SD) duration of surgery in minutes

83.9(± 34)

67.2(± 15.9)

0.0027

Intraoperative CSF space opening

11(7%)

1(3%)

0.6955

Remission

103/123(83.7%)

21/22(95.5%)

0.2000

Diabetes insipidus/SIADH

15(9.7%)

1(3%)

0.3131

New pituitary insufficiency

16(10.3%)

2(6%)

0.7442

Microadenoma – Repeated surgery

n = 38

n = 10

 

Mean(± SD) duration of surgery in minutes

97.7(± 35)

86.5(± 26.9)

0.0625

Intraoperative CSF space opening

7(18.4%)

3(3%)

0.4143

Remission

16/31(51.6%)

3/6(50%)

> 0.9999

Diabetes insipidus/SIADH

5(13.2%)

0

0.5689

New pituitary insufficiency

2(5.3%)

1(1%)

0.5123

Macroadenoma – First surgery

n = 63

n = 16

 

Mean(± SD) duration of surgery in minutes

84.5(± 24.9)

67.8(± 13.6)

0.0191

Intraoperative CSF space opening

7(11.1%)

2(12.5%)

> 0.9999

Remission

32/51(62.7%)

11/13(84.6%)

0.1912

Diabetes insipidus/SIADH

8(12.7%)

0

0.1973

New pituitary insufficiency

11(17.5%)

1(6.25%)

0.4417

Macroadenoma – Repeated surgery

n = 28

n = 4

 

Mean(± SD) duration of surgery in minutes

105.7(± 41.3)

100.3(± 15.5)

> 0.9999

Intraoperative CSF space opening

8(28.6%)

0

0.5497

Remission

4/26(15.4%)

1/4(25%)

0.5384

Diabetes insipidus/SIADH

4(14.3%)

0

> 0.9999

New pituitary insufficiency

5(17.9%)

1(25%)

> 0.9999

All tumors

n = 307

n = 66

 

Mean(± SD) duration of surgery in minutes

87.5(± 34.1)

71.9(± 19.8)

< 0.0001

Intraoperative CSF-leakage

38/304(12.5%)

6(9.1%)

0.5331

Remission

163/246(66.3%)

39/48(81%)

0.0422

Diabetes insipidus/SIADH

33/304(10.9%)

1(1.5%)

0.0164

New pituitary insufficiency

35/304(11.5%)

5(7.6%)

0.5109

No tumor

n = 33

n = 12

 

Mean(± SD) duration of surgery in minutes

110.4(± 45.5)

75(± 30.4)

0.0977

Intraoperative CSF-leakage

2(6.1%)

1(8.3%)

> 0.9999

Remission

9/21(42.9%)

6/11(54.5%)

0.7120

Diabetes insipidus/SIADH

2(6.1%)

1(8.3%)

> 0.9999

New pituitary insufficiency

2(6.1%)

0

> 0.9999

All operations

n = 340

n = 78

 

Mean(± SD) duration of surgery in minutes

90.7(± 36.2)

72.5(± 21.8)

< 0.0001

Intraoperative CSF space opening

40/337(11.9%)

7(9%)

0.5558

Remission

172/267(64.4%)

45/59(76.3%)

0.0939

Diabetes insipidus/SIADH

35/337(10.4%)

2(2.6%)

0.0269

New pituitary insufficiency

37/337(11%)

5(6.4%)

0.2986

n - number of patients, SIADH - Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion

Surgical aspects, Complications and Distinctive Features

Mean duration of surgery was significantly shorter in ExTS compared to MTS (72.5(± 21.8) minutes vs. 90.7(± 36.2), p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses were performed with respect to tumor size, the presence or absence of tumor (in MRI or after histo?) and a history of prior surgeries. Significantly shorter duration of surgery could be observed in all tumor resections (71.9(± 19.8) minutes vs. 87.5(± 34.1) minutes, p < 0.0001), but especially with a predominance in primary surgeries of microadenomas (67.2(± 15.9) minutes vs. 83.9(± 34) minutes, p = 0.0027) and macroadenomas (67.8(± 13.6) minutes vs. 84.5(± 24.9) minutes, p = 0.0191). In CD with absence of histological tumor detection no significant difference in surgical duration could be found between both surgical procedures (75(± 30.4) minutes vs. 110.4(± 45.5) minutes, p = 0.0977).

Intraoperative CSF space opening (9% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.5558) and new postoperative pituitary insufficiency (6.4% vs. 11%, p = 0.2986) were comparable between ExTS and MTS.

The incidence of electrolyte imbalances in the ExTS collective was lower compared to MTS. Other less common postoperative complications after both MTS and ExTS are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3

Other complications after microscopic and exoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.

Complication

Comment

%

MTS

   

1 CN palsy w/ diplopia

CN III

0.3

6 CSF-leakage

1 with meningitis, 1 with ventriculitis, 2 w/ reoperation, and 1 with vp-shunt

1.8

1 abscess

intrasellar

0.3

3 postoperative hemorrhage

1 subdural hematoma, 1 subarachnoidal hemorrhage with vasospasm, bleeding after inferior petrosal sinus sampling

0.6

4 epistaxis

 

1.2

10 required intensive care

Mostly due to electrolyte imbalance

2.9

Endocrinological

11 adrenal crisis

1.3

Other

2 sinusitis, 1 stroke of middle cerebral artery, 2 venous thromboembolism

1.5

ExTS

   

2 epistaxis

 

2.6

1 required intensive care

Due to respiratory insufficiency

1.3

1 CSF-leakage

 

1.3

Endocrinological

1 adrenal crisis

1.3

CN = cranial nerves; op = operation; reop = reoperation; vp-shunt = ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Discussion

Surgical Procedures, Complications and Remission

Here we present the first study comparing the mean duration of surgery, complication and remission rates between MTS and ExTS in CD.

Our results show a statistically significantly shorter mean duration of ExTS compared to MTS. These differences are especially remarkable in primary surgeries of microadenomas and macroadenomas. On the other hand, we did not observe a significant difference between both techniques for tumor recurrence surgeries, which could be explained by the small number of patients in these groups and the manifold variables associated with prior surgeries such as previous operative technique, primary surgeon, extent of resection and complications, which could not be completely accounted for in our analysis.

Interestingly, we could observe a high inconsistency regarding the incidence of complications and remission rate after MTS in the literature 13, 6,16, which can result from batch effects.

Studies with a percentage frequency distribution of micro- and macroadenoma similar to our cohort revealed similar remission rates 1,17. Higher remission presented in other studies may be associated with a higher percentage of microadenomas within these cohorts 2,3,6. Analyses considering microadenomas and macroadenomas separately revealed comparable remission rates with our results 3,4,6. The incidence of new postoperative pituitary insufficiency along with diabetes insipidus were lower after ETS than MTS 2,3,6.

Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (ETS) is a well-established technique in the treatment of CD, especially for invasive adenomas, as it may provide better visualization for suprasellar extension or lateral invasion of the tumor, and it is associated with a lower incidence of new postoperative pituitary insufficiency2,3,6. Data regarding remission and gross total resection (GTR) rates remain incoherent 2,3,6.

ExTS offered postoperative high remission rates comparable with that after ETS, but with a lower rate of postoperative complications such as new hypopituitarism or SIADH/diabetes insipidus and a shorter mean duration of surgery as described in the literature 13, 6,18,19. Based on these results, ExTS may present a further development in the treatment for Cushing’s disease by evolution of the optical possibilities and thus improving the postoperative results.

Study Limitations

Our study is limited partly by the retrospective character of the analysis. Moreover, not all patients were available for follow-up analyses. For three patients, clinical data were not available.

Conclusions

Our study presents the largest available cohort of patients after exoscopic transsphenoidal surgery and confirms the utility of this operative technique in the management of Cushing’s disease as it shows lower postoperative SIADH/diabetes insipidus rates, a higher remission rate and a shorter duration of surgery compared to microscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Additionally, no significant differences between both techniques were observed with respect to postoperative new pituitary insufficiency. These results are in line with our previous publication on the general applicability of an exoscope in pituitary surgery. For Cushing’s disease it might be even more meaningful, due to the relatively small adenomas, which lack the necessity of an endoscopic approach. These first results are very promising; however, further studies comparing with the endoscopic approach are necessary to fully evaluate the utility of the operative technique.

Abbreviations

ACTH adrenocorticotropic hormone

CN cranial nerve

CSF cerebrospinal fluid

CSS cavernous sinus sampling 

ETS endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery

ExTS exoscopic transsphenoidal surgery

FSH follicle-stimulating hormone

GH growth hormone

GTR gross total resection

IPSS inferior petrosal sinus sampling 

LH luteinizing hormone

MRI magnetic resonance imaging

MTS microscopic transsphenoidal surgery

PH3 phosphohistone-3

SIADH syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion

TSH thyroid stimulating hormone

Declarations

Funding

The tumors in the present study were included in the German Registry of Pituitary Tumors, which is sponsored by Novartis Pharma GmbH (Nürnberg), Novo Nordisk Pharma GmbH (Mainz), Phizer Pharma GmbH (Berlin) and Ipsen Pharma GmbH (Ettlingen).

Competing interests

Jörg Flitsch has been a lecturer for Olympus.  

Author contributions

Conception and design: Rotermund, Sumislawski. Acquisition of data: Sumislawski, Rotermund, Ryba, Piffko, Burkhardt, Saeger. Analysis and interpretation of data: Sumislawski, Rotermund. Drafting the article: Sumislawski, Rotermund. Critically revising the article: Rotermund, Aberle, Flitsch, Huckhagel, Burkhardt. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: all authors. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Rotermund. Administrative/technical/material support: Saeger. Study supervision: Rotermund.

Ethics statement

Approval of the study was obtained by the local ethics committee (Ethikkommission der Ärztekammer Hamburg). Informed consent was obtained from all patients (above 16 years old) and their legal guardian(s) (below 16 years of age).  

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.  

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

The authors affirm that informed consent for publication was given by all participants.

Availability of supporting data

Underlining data can be provided upon reasonable request.

References

1. Bora SK, Suri A, Khadgawat R, et al. Management of Cushing’s Disease: Changing Trend from Microscopic to Endoscopic Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:e46-e54. doi:10.1016/J.WNEU.2019.08.165

2. Møller MW, Andersen MS, Glintborg D, et al. Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a single centre study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1). doi:10.1038/S41598-020-78823-Z

3. Broersen LHA, Biermasz NR, van Furth WR, et al. Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pituitary. 2018;21(5):524-534. doi:10.1007/S11102-018-0893-3

4. Broersen LHA, van Haalen FM, Biermasz NR, et al. Microscopic versus endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery in the Leiden cohort treated for Cushing’s disease: surgical outcome, mortality, and complications. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14(1). doi:10.1186/S13023-019-1038-0

5. Pablo A, Sofia B, Maximiliano T, et al. Endoscopic versus Microscopic Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: A Single-center Study. Neurol India. 2019;67(4):1015. doi:10.4103/0028-3886.266241

6. Qiao N. Outcome of endoscopic vs microsurgical transsphenoidal resection for Cushing’s disease. Endocr Connect. 2018;7(1):R26-R37. doi:10.1530/EC-17-0312

7. Kijima N, Kinoshita M, Takagaki M, Kishima H. Utility of a novel exoscope, ORBEYE, in gravity-assisted brain retraction surgery for midline lesions of the brain. Surg Neurol Int. 2021;12. doi:10.25259/SNI_320_2021

8. Muscas G, Battista F, Boschi A, Morone F, della Puppa A. A Single-Center Experience with the Olympus ORBEYE 4K-3D Exoscope for Microsurgery of Complex Cranial Cases: Technical Nuances and Learning Curve. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2021;82(5):484-489. doi:10.1055/S-0040-1719106

9. Göttsche J, Piffko A, Pantel TF, et al. Experiences with a 3D4K digital exoscope system (ORBEYE) in a wide range of neurosurgical procedures. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. Published online February 10, 2022. doi:10.1055/A-1768-4060

10. Vetrano IG, Acerbi F, Falco J, D’Ammando A, Devigili G, Nazzi V. High-Definition 4K 3D Exoscope (ORBEYETM) in Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Surgery: A Preliminary, Explorative, Pilot Study. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;19(4):480-488. doi:10.1093/ONS/OPAA090

11. Fiani B, Jarrah R, Griepp DW, Adukuzhiyil J. The Role of 3D Exoscope Systems in Neurosurgery: An Optical Innovation. Cureus. 2021;13(6). doi:10.7759/CUREUS.15878

12. Rotermund R, Regelsberger J, Osterhage K, Aberle J, Flitsch J. 4K 3-dimensional video microscope system (orbeye) for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021;163(8):2097-2106. doi:10.1007/S00701-021-04762-X

13. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, et al. Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(12):847-875. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00235-7

14. Lüdecke DK, Abe T. Transsphenoidal Microsurgery for Newly Diagnosed Acromegaly: A Personal View after More than 1,000 Operations. Neuroendocrinology. 2006;83(3-4):230-239. doi:10.1159/000095533

15. Rotermund R, Burkhardt T, Rohani Z, Jung R, Aberle J, Flitsch J. Value of early postoperative random growth hormone levels and nadir growth hormone levels after oral glucose tolerance testing in acromegaly. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2018;41:64-70. doi:10.1016/J.GHIR.2018.03.002

16. Joshi SM, Cudlip S. Transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary. 2008;11(4):353-360. doi:10.1007/S11102-008-0094-6

17. Alwani RA, de Herder WW, van Aken MO, et al. Biochemical predictors of outcome of pituitary surgery for Cushing’s disease. Neuroendocrinology. 2010;91(2):169-178. doi:10.1159/000258677

18. Masui K, Wajima D, Aketa S, Nishimura F. Efficacy of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for cushing’s disease: Case series and review of the literature. Neurol India. 2020;68(2):403-406. doi:10.4103/0028-3886.284363

19. Cebula H, Baussart B, Villa C, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease in 230 patients with positive and negative MRI. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159(7):1227-1236. doi:10.1007/S00701-017-3140-1