3.1 Characterization of the CaMnGS sample
Figure 1a shows the XRD patterns of CaMn4O8 (CaMn), CaMn4O8–G (CaMnG), and CaMn4O8–G–SiO2 (CaMnGS), respectively.
A crystal structure for CaMn4O8 has now been established. Orthorhombic perovskite structure is seen in CaMn4O8. The (004), (011), (200), (112), (020), (013), (116), and (020) planes in the XRD pattern of mesoporous CaMnGS are connected to various XRD peaks in the XRD pattern. The orthorhombic structure was clearly visible in every pattern in the produced material, with no traces of impurity phases [24].
Figure 1b shows the EDS analysis of CaMnGS that was used to identify its elemental composition.
EDS identified a high concentration of C, O, Ca, Mn, and Si elements, but no additional contaminants. The CaMnGS sample quantitative investigation discovered significant amounts of C (3.47%), O (48.44%), Ca (25.50%), Si (5.9%), and Mn (23.53%), in addition to other elements.
SEM, TEM, and HRTEM images of CaMn4O8 (CaMn), CaMn4O8–G (CaMnG), and CaMn4O8–G–SiO2 (CaMnGS) samples were collected for electron microscopy studies to examine sample morphology, as shown in Fig. 2.
According to the results of TEM and HRTEM images, the self-assembly synthesis yields agglomerated CaMn nanoparticles [25], with an average diameter as indicated in Fig. 2a. When combined with graphene and mesoporous SiO2, as shown in Figs. 2b & c, SEM images of CaMnG and CaMnGS reveal the material’s well-distributed nature. A combination of graphene and mesoporous SiO2 did not affect the CaMn4O8 nanoparticles, as seen by TEM images in Figs. 2e & f. CaMnG and CaMnGS are both confirmed by HRTEM images.
Mesoporous materials are known to exhibit the H2 Type IV isotherm and a Type H2 hysteresis loop in the (0.6 to 0.9) P/P0 range. In the adsorbent, mesopores were discovered to have a pore size distribution of 13.97 nm, confirming the existence of mesopores. XPS analysis was used to determine the surface chemical compositions of the mesoporous CaMn4O8–G–SiO2 (CaMnGS).
Figure 4 shows the Ca, Mn, C, O, and Si results. The CaMn4O8–G–SiO2 (CaMnGS) nanocomposite’s chemical states and surface composition were confirmed using an XPS examination, which was carried out in the lab.
Figure S1a of the Supplementary information shows the XPS analysis of Ca2p that was used to detect the chemical state of Ca in CaMnGS. To distinguish one peak from the other, the Ca2p spectra has two peaks with binding energies of (348.12 and 351.62) eV for Ca2p3/2 and Ca2p1/2 respectively. According to the binding energies of calcium in CaMnGS [26], the Ca2p peaks in the XPS spectrum are consistent. There are two peaks at (641.85 and 654.02) eV for Mn 2p3/2 and Mn 2p1/2, which are characteristic of Mn3+-based materials [27] in Fig. S1b of the SI. This shows that the CaMnGS surface prefers Mn substitution. Figure S1c of the SI shows the C1s spectra exhibit peaks at (284.08 and 289.08) eV that are thought to represent C − C bonding and O − C = O. Figure S1d of the SI, which depicts O1s spectra, shows C − O bonding at 532.02 eV [20]. The presence of SiO2 on the CaMnGS surface is seen in Fig. S1e of the SI at 102.03 eV [22].
Figure 5(a) shows the EIS findings. Due to its high electrical conductivity, CaMn4O8–G–SiO2 (CaMnGS) has a charge–transfer resistance of 25 Ω.
The charge–transfer resistance of CaMnGS was found to be lower than that of CaMn and CaMnG. This suggests that graphene addition significantly increases the electrical conductivity, and therefore, the electrochemical performance in a CaMnGS sample.
As illustrated in Fig. 5b, Raman spectra may be used to study the graphene oxide D and G bands for structural information.
Both of these bands are associated with the out-of-plane breathing mode of the Sp2 atom induced by defects and E2g phonons near the Brillion zone center. The G band is created by the stretching of carbon sp2 atom bonds, whereas the D band is caused by structural disorder [27]. The ID/IG ratio (derived from the intensity of the D and G bands) may be used to describe the graphitic structural disorder in carbon materials. Because of the various functional groups generated during the oxidation of graphite powder, GO has a very disordered structure, as seen in Fig. 5b. The D band is located at 1,352 cm− 1, while the G band is located at 1,596 cm− 1.
3.2. Electrochemical behavior of CMGS
Figure 6 depicts the linear CV curve for the electrochemical behavior of the (a) CaMn4O8–G–SiO2 (CaMnGS), (b) CaMn4O8–G (CaMnG), and (c) CaMn4O8–G–SiO2 (CaMn) in the absence of the Penicillium italicum fungus at 10 mVs− 1.
The maximum peak current shows 6.6 × 10− 1 mA cm− 2 for CaMnGS electrode, while CaMn and CaMnG are found at (2.0 × 10− 3 and 3.0 × 10− 4) mA cm− 2, respectively. According to CaMn, CaMnG, and CaMnGS, the peak current improved in CaMnGS due to the CaMnGS electrode electroconductivity, which was discovered to have further increased by adding graphene and SiO2 to the working electrode surface. It has been shown that graphene and SiO2 work synergistically to enhance electron transport between the redox probe and electrode surface. The electrochemical performance of the CaMnGS working electrode has been significantly improved because of the addition of graphene and SiO2 to the porous structure. In part, this is due to the large surface area of the composite material, and the functional group located there [28].
Exposure to Penicillium italicum fungus reduced the current for CaMn and CaMnG to (1.0 × 10− 4 and 5.0 × 10− 5) mA cm− 2, respectively, as shown in Fig. 7 (a), but Fig. 7 (b) shows that the peak current for CaMnGS electrode decreased to 2.0 × 10− 5 mA cm− 2.
This is due to the CaMnGS electrode SiO2 surface modification, which increases the rate at which electrons move from the electrolytic solution to the electrode. There are chemical and biological components on the CaMnGS surface that drastically restrict the pace at which electrons may be transferred. The study confirmed that CaMnGS electrodes for biosensing must be modified with conductive nanomaterials on the surface to collect the tiniest of biological activity signals. A decrease in current density and an increase in insulating quality are achieved by Penicillium italicum covalently adhering to the electrode surface [28]. For further study, it was decided to build a biosensor to measure the quantitative amount of Penicillium italicum to simultaneously identify the fungus, which is discussed in more detail in the next section.
Chronoamperometry was also used to measure Penicillium italicum fungus, as seen in Fig. 8.
The CaMnGS electrode was utilized to facilitate a suitable reaction, which was then delivered to the electrochemical detection cell for chronoamperometry, together with the various concentrations of Penicillium italicum. As the Penicillium italicum concentration rises, the observed current diminishes. Covalent connections formed between the Penicillium italicum fungus and the biosensor inhibit the movement of electrons from the solution to electrode surface. In terms of linear detection range, low detection limit, and analysis time, the proposed biosensor possesses all of these features, and more [29]. The best biosensor response was discovered at pH 7.0, which is a critical factor in biosensor response. Lower reaction was seen at higher pH values. Biosensor sensitivity was only about half of what it was when the pH level was higher in the acidic range. In the next part, we study pH dependence to determine the suitable pH value.
Because the pH of the electrolyte might affect the peak potential and peak current of the modified electrode, measuring the proton-to-electron ratio involved in the electrode reaction is more advantageous than determining other parameters. Because a change in pH results in a change in the current density of the electrode, the two are related. As a result, the pH range is also critical for biosensors. Figure 9 shows the results of a pH scan performed at a rate of 10 mVs− 1 throughout the pH range (4 to 9).
There is a tiny shift in current density in the pH range (4 − 9), which we can see. During a study of CaMnGS peak currents, it was discovered that pH 7.5 was the most appropriate for biological chemical detection applications.
Additional comparators for evaluating the CaMnGS sensor selectivity included kitchen fungus, bread fungus, and biofilm. An electrode was immersed with a variety of strains of the same concentration, as seen in Fig. 10, to estimate the current density. Penicillium italicum exhibited a lower value when the other two species were injected dropwise, although the value of Penicillium italicum was 5 × 10− 5 mA cm− 2.
The sensor was able to correctly identify Penicillium italicum, as shown by the results. This phenomenon happened due to the hydrogen bonding of Penicillium italicum with mesoporous CaMnGS sensor. Penicillium italicum binds with hydrogen bonding and collapses the electron transfer by blocking the active site. Then any other biological material can’t bind. Detection of the selectivity was carried out after the appropriate pH and thermal states had been established.
Figure 11 depicts the temperature-dependent sensitivity of CaMnGS electrodes to Penicillium italicum.
For the CaMnGS sensor, the sensor sensitivity was evaluated to ensure that the sensor sensitivity of Penicillium italicum was affected by temperature changes. To demonstrate its capacity to detect temperature, the CaMnGS electrode performed well in temperature ranges of (30 to 70) °C. When the temperature rises over 65°C, the Penicillium italicum is eliminated, as shown by our sensor, and the CaMnGS sensor may transfer electrons and enhance the conductivity of the sensor, confirming this. In parallel, the temperature dependency test provides the thermal stability determination and confirmation of the absence or presence of Penicillium italicum. While at 37°C, the current density is 3.0 × 10− 5 mA cm− 2, due to the presence of Penicillium italicum in the sensor, which prevents electron transfer, when the temperature is raised to 65°C, the Penicillium italicum is destroyed, resulting in an increase in the current density to 1.0 × 10− 4 mA cm− 2. As a result, the ideal sensor temperature to detect Penicillium italicum well is (30 to 50) °C [30].