This study has demonstrated that the designed educational intervention (drama, lecture, question-and-answer session, and educational leaflets) significantly improved knowledge in all domains on breast cancer risk factors, signs and symptoms, breast self-examination and the practice of BSE significantly among adolescent females. The overall knowledge on breast cancer improved after the intervention from 17.2–59.4% (p < 0.001). The greatest improvement was seen in general knowledge about breast cancer from 29.1–72.5% (p < 0.001) and the least improvement in knowledge on BSE from 9.8–22.2% (p < 0.001).
It has been established that the level of knowledge about breast cancer among the youth is inadequate. A close look at the domains pre-education reveals very low scores for general knowledge (29.1%) and features of breast cancer (33.2%), and even lower scores for breast self-examination 9.8%. This is similar to breast cancer knowledge levels in other low and middle income countries (LMIC) such as Nigeria[16, 23], India[24], Bangladesh[15] and Siri Lanka[18]. This phenomenon is however, not restricted to LMIC. Adolescents in developed countries have also been found to be deficient in breast cancer knowledge. College and high school students in the USA have been found to have poor knowledge on breast cancer, its risk factors and BSE, scoring a mean of 13.5 ± 0.33 (high school students) and 15.5 ± 0.32 (college students) out of a total score of 30.[10] This inadequate breast cancer knowledge among the youth worldwide makes a case for the introduction of breast cancer education targeted at adolescents.
This study was innovative in using a multi-tooled approach: first a drama acted out by the students, then a PowerPoint lecture given by doctors, followed by a question-and-answer session and finally breast cancer information leaflets for participants to take home and read. Others have applied various educational methods, all with good results. An hour long lesson has been proven to improve the knowledge base of girls on breast cancer and BSE.[25] A quasi-experimental research carried out among Nigerian adolescents used BSE pamphlets, and testing done 8 weeks later found an increase in BSE knowledge and perception.[26] Another publication from Nigeria demonstrated that a 45–60 minute educational session utilizing PowerPoint, video and demonstration of BSE resulted in a significant improvement in knowledge, attitude and the practice of BSE 8 weeks after intervention.[27] This study utilized students to act out a drama in order to make learning a collaborative experience. Also in Nigeria, a study found peer education to be an effective tool and a cost effective means of breast cancer education among adolescents[16]
The use of peer educators has demonstrated similar success in Egypt.[28] A study carried out among adolescents in Mexican middle schools utilized an educational intervention which included a reading guide that was later discussed at a plenary session. Likewise, this saw significant learning with 53% correct answers pre-intervention increasing to 75% correct answers post-intervention.[29] In Saudi Arabia an all-female team of doctors visiting schools employed a series of short lectures, discussion groups and role playing on the technique of breast examination. They found that not only did the mean knowledge indexes for breast cancer and BSE improve after an educational session, but also some girls (27%) had started practicing BSE over the 6-month period post intervention.[30]
In a comparison of breast health teaching methods, it was found that interactive teaching methods with simulated breast models resulted in higher knowledge retention 4 weeks after the intervention compared to the traditional didactic teaching method. It is noteworthy however, that there was still significant improvement in knowledge in both the traditional didactic and the interactive methods.[12] Indeed, the use of demonstration methods and audio-visual media has been found to be a successful means of breast cancer and BSE education among adolescents.[14] Recently the impact of social media has been explored and the use of youth-targeted YouTube-styled videos has been promising in educating adolescents on the breast cancer risk associated with smoking.[11] These studies all prove that various teaching tools and if possible as was utilized in our study, a combination of teaching methods is effective in achieving learning in breast cancer education.
For breast cancer education to be effective there should be a translation of the knowledge into appropriate health seeking and preventive practices and the appropriate attitude should one detect any breast changes or be diagnosed with breast cancer. For instance, a study done in a Ghanaian University of Allied Health found that at least 70% were aware of breast cancer, mammography and BSE, but this knowledge did not influence their behaviour, as only 43% practiced BSE and 46% of these students felt there was no chance that they might develop breast cancer in the future, while 16% were uncertain of their risk. Not surprisingly, those who felt there was no risk or did not know their risk were less likely to perform BSE than those who perceived some risk.[31] Though the level of breast cancer awareness and BSE awareness in Malaysia was as good as 87.6% and 60.6% respectively, the knowledge on BSE was poor (40.4%).[32] In this study we found that our educational intervention did not change the perception (in 94% of participants) that handkerchiefs/mobile phones placed in a brasier is not a risk for developing breast cancer (p = 0.693). The knowledge that sore/rash is a symptom of breast cancer also did not significantly improve from 66.9–68.3% (p = 0.484). Knowledge on the recommended age at which women are to start screening mammograms also showed minimal improvement from 2.6–5.3% (p < 0.001). This phenomenon is not unique to our study. For instance, the impression that pain and weight loss were not the first symptoms of breast cancer was not corrected after the Nigerian educational intervention.[16]
On the other hand, our intervention did see a significant increase in the number of students practicing BSE 3 months post-intervention from 38.6–44.9% (p = 0.005). Notably, more girls now believed that BC is a curable disease, from 28.8% pre-intervention to 37.9% post-intervention (p < 0.001). Likewise, an educational intervention in the UK was found to have a sustained improvement in breast knowledge and attitudes 3 and 6 months later.[13] A quasi-experimental study in Korea found that a breast cancer educational intervention did improve all aspects of learning a week after the intervention. However, 3 months later breast cancer knowledge and attitude on prevention were sustained but the improvement was not sustained for self-efficacy and behavioural intentions. This was attributed to the ability of short-term interventions to change one’s knowledge but not necessarily the social cognitive factors that would reflect in a sustained behaviour change. Such sustained behaviour changes would take long-term interventions involving several booster sessions.[33]
An innovative educational intervention carried out in Mexico went further to determine the impact on the female relatives of the participants and it was found that there was transference of knowledge so that breast cancer knowledge of relatives at home saw improvement from 55–61% 4 months post-intervention. This demonstrates a potential strategy for public education and change in societal norms.[34] Breast cancer educational programs should be designed to achieve sustained gains in knowledge and long-term behavioural change in the community.
Social media, teachers and electronic media have been found to be the leading sources of information on breast cancer and little from health professionals.[31, 32] Getting already limited and constrained healthcare professionals into every school and every classroom, though desirable, may not be practical. There is a need for innovation in getting cancer education into schools either as part of the curriculum or seasonal school activities. Schoolgirls themselves have concerns about and admit the need for breast cancer education.[35] A case for schools to lead in cancer health education has been made in a commentary by Morse in which he makes reference to the guidelines and scope of such a program drawn up as far back as 1995 by the ACS.[36] The Centre for Disease Control (CDC) also recommends that the youth be taught cancer protective behaviours which include good nutrition, physical activity, human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination and reducing harmful exposures to smoking, alcohol, tanning, certain chemicals, etc.[37]
In Portugal a training program for biology teachers was found to be an effective tool in increasing teachers’ knowledge and perception of cancer and resulted in an increase also in students’ knowledge on cancer. This project covered education in breast, cervical, colorectal and skin cancer.[38] A Cancer Education Partnership Program has been developed in the USA for underserved schools. This introduced children as young as third-grade through to high school to the concept of cancer, exposing them to basic knowledge about cancer risks, prevention, nutrition and more advanced oncology, genetics and biotechnology as they got older.[39] 2020 saw the introduction of health education in UK curricula which includes preventive lifestyles and awareness of cancer screening.[40]
Schools present the perfect opportunity to gain access to a nation’s youth and it should be possible to introduce breast cancer education in schools in Ghana and other LMICs. It would be prudent to train teachers to be the primary source of information. A collaboration between the Health and Education Sectors would be beneficial in organizing training programs and developing materials for the curriculum/syllabus. This need not be restricted to breast cancer but can be extended to other cancers and diseases of public health importance. The schools’ efforts could then be augmented by a team of health professionals from the school locality. These healthcare workers could be given access to schools periodically during awareness months to have a more detailed interaction with students. Our experience on school visits has been characterized by enthusiasm and cooperation both on the side of the school authorities/teachers and the students. We believe that such programs will be a welcome introduction in our schools.