Ager AA, Evers CR, Day MA, et al (2017) Network analysis of wildfire transmission and implications for risk governance. PLoS One 12:e0172867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172867
Allen CD, Savage M, Falk DA, et al (2002) Ecological Restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems: A Broad Perspective. Ecol Appl 12:1418. https://doi.org/10.2307/3099981
Bagdon BA, Huang C-HH, Dewhurst S (2016) Managing for ecosystem services in northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests using a novel simulation-to-optimization methodology. Ecol Modell 324:11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.12.012
Barros AMG, Ager AA, Day MA, et al (2018) Wildfires managed for restoration enhance ecological resilience. Ecosphere 9:e02161. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2161
Botequilha Leitão A, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59:65–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00005-1
Bottero A, D’Amato AW, Palik BJ, et al (2017) Density-dependent vulnerability of forest ecosystems to drought. J Appl Ecol 54:1605–1614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12847
Bradford JB, D’Amato AW (2012) Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management. Front Ecol Environ 10:210–216. https://doi.org/10.1890/110031
Buyantuyev A, Wu J (2007) Effects of thematic resolution on landscape pattern analysis. Landsc Ecol 22:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9010-5
Cannon JB, Barrett KJ, Gannon BM, et al (2018) Collaborative restoration effects on forest structure in ponderosa pine-dominated forests of Colorado. For Ecol Manage 424:191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.026
Cannon JB, Gannon BM, Feinstein JA, et al (2020) Simulating spatial complexity in dry conifer forest restoration: implications for conservation prioritization and scenario evaluation. Landsc Ecol 8:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01111-8
Churchill DJ, Larson AJ, Dahlgreen MC, et al (2013) Restoring forest resilience: From reference spatial patterns to silvicultural prescriptions and monitoring. For Ecol Manage 291:442–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.007
Cocke AE, Fulé PZ, Crouse JE (2005) Comparison of burn severity assessments using Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data. Int J Wildl Fire 14:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF04010
Collins BM, Everett RG, Stephens SL, et al (2011) Impacts of fire exclusion and recent managed fire on forest structure in old growth Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Ecosphere 2:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES11-00026.1
Corry RC, Lafortezza R (2007) Sensitivity of landscape measurements to changing grain size for fine-scale design and management. Landsc Ecol Eng 3:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-006-0015-7
Covington WW, Fulé PZ, Hart SC, Weaver RP (2001) Modeling ecological restoration effects on ponderosa pine forest structure. Restor Ecol 9:421–431. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2001.94011.x
Covington WW, Fulé PZ, Moore MM, et al (1997) Restoring ecosystem health in ponderosa pine forests of the southwest. J For 95:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/95.4.23
Cushman SA, McGarigal K, Neel MC (2008) Parsimony in landscape metrics: Strength, universality, and consistency. Ecol Indic 8:691–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.12.002
Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH, et al (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0539.1
de Almeida DRA, Stark SC, Valbuena R, et al (2020) A new era in forest restoration monitoring. Restor Ecol 28:8–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13067
Dickinson Y, Pelz K, Giles E, Howie J (2016) Have we been successful? Monitoring horizontal forest complexity for forest restoration projects. Restor Ecol 24:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12291
Eidenshink J, Schwind B, Brewer K, et al (2007) A Project for Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity. Fire Ecol 3:3–21. https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0301003
Fitch RA, Kim YS, Waltz AEM, Crouse JE (2018) Changes in potential wildland fire suppression costs due to restoration treatments in Northern Arizona Ponderosa pine forests. For Policy Econ 87:101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.11.006
Fulé PZ, Covington WW, Smith HB, et al (2002) Comparing ecological restoration alternatives: Grand Canyon, Arizona. For Ecol Manage 170:19–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00759-9
Fulé PZ, Crouse JE, Cocke AE, et al (2004) Changes in canopy fuels and potential fire behavior 1880-2040: Grand Canyon, Arizona. Ecol Modell 175:231–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.023
Ganey JL, Block WM, Jenness JS, Wilson RA (1999) Mexican spotted owl home range and habitat use in pine-oak forest: Implications for forest management. For Sci 45:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/45.1.127
Gleason KE, Bradford JB, Bottero A, et al (2017) Competition amplifies drought stress in forests across broad climatic and compositional gradients. Ecosphere 8:. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1849
Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, et al (2017) Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens Environ 202:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
Grabska E, Frantz D, Ostapowicz K (2020) Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for forest stand species mapping using Sentinel-2 imagery and environmental data in the Polish Carpathians. Remote Sens Environ 251:112103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112103
Hargis CD, Bissonette JA, David JL (1998) The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 13:167–186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007965018633
Hengl T, De Jesus JM, Heuvelink GBM, et al (2017) SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS One 12:e0169748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748
Hesselbarth MHK, Sciaini M, With KA, et al (2019) landscapemetrics: an open-source R tool to calculate landscape metrics. Ecography (Cop) 42:1648–1657. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04617
Hjerpe E, Abrams J, Becker DR (2009) Socioeconomic barriers and the role of biomass utilization in southwestern ponderosa pine restoration. Ecol. Restor. 27:169–177
Huffman DW, Crouse JE, Sánchez Meador AJ, et al (2018) Restoration benefits of re-entry with resource objective wildfire on a ponderosa pine landscape in northern Arizona, USA. For Ecol Manage 408:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.032
Huffman DW, Roccaforte JP, Springer JD, Crouse JE (2020) Restoration applications of resource objective wildfires in western US forests: a status of knowledge review. Fire Ecol. 16:1–13
Huffman DW, Sánchez Meador AJ, Stoddard MT, et al (2017) Efficacy of resource objective wildfires for restoration of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests in northern Arizona. For Ecol Manage 389:395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.036
Hunter ME, Iniguez JM, Lentile LB (2011) Short- and long-term effects on fuels, forest structure, and wildfire potential from prescribed fire and resource benefit fire in southwestern forests, USA. Fire Ecol 7:108–121. https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0703108
Jacobs DF, Oliet JA, Aronson J, et al (2015) Restoring forests: What constitutes success in the twenty-first century? New For. 46:601–614
Johnston JD, Bailey JD, Dunn CJ (2016) Influence of fire disturbance and biophysical heterogeneity on pre-settlement ponderosa pine and mixed conifer forests. Ecosphere 7:. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1581
Kalies EL, Yocom Kent LL (2016) Tamm Review: Are fuel treatments effective at achieving ecological and social objectives? A systematic review. For Ecol Manage 375:84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.021
Kane VR, Bartl-Geller BN, North MP, et al (2019) First-entry wildfires can create opening and tree clump patterns characteristic of resilient forests. For Ecol Manage 454:117659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117659
Kerr JT, Ostrovsky M (2003) From space to species: Ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends Ecol Evol 18:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00071-5
Larson AJ, Churchill D (2012) Tree spatial patterns in fire-frequent forests of western North America, including mechanisms of pattern formation and implications for designing fuel reduction and restoration treatments. For Ecol Manage 267:74–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.038
Li J, Roy DP (2017) A global analysis of Sentinel-2a, Sentinel-2b and Landsat-8 data revisit intervals and implications for terrestrial monitoring. Remote Sens 9:902. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090902
Loberger CD, Theimer TC, Rosenstock SS, Wightman CS (2011) Use of restoration-treated ponderosa pine forest by tassel-eared squirrels. J Mammal 92:1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.1644/10-MAMM-A-321.1
Lowry J, Ramsey RD, Thomas K, et al (2007) Mapping moderate-scale land-cover over very large geographic areas within a collaborative framework: A case study of the Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project (SWReGAP). Remote Sens Environ 108:59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.008
Lydersen JM, North MP, Knapp EE, Collins BM (2013) Quantifying spatial patterns of tree groups and gaps in mixed-conifer forests: Reference conditions and long-term changes following fire suppression and logging. For Ecol Manage 304:370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.023
Marsaglia G, Tsang WW, Wang J (2003) Evaluating Kolmogorov’s distribution. J Stat Softw 8:1–4. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v008.i18
Mast JN, Fulé PZ, Moore MM, et al (1999) Restoration of presettlement age structure of an Arizona ponderosa pine forest. Ecol Appl 9:228–239. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0228:ROPASO]2.0.CO;2
McCauley LA, Robles MD, Woolley T, et al (2019) Large-scale forest restoration stabilizes carbon under climate change in Southwest United States. Ecol Appl 29:e01979. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1979
McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. In: Comput. Softw. Progr. Prod. by authors Univ. Massachusetts, Amherst. Available Follow. web site http//www. umass. edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats. html.
McGarigal K, Wan HY, Zeller KA, et al (2016) Multi-scale habitat selection modeling: a review and outlook. Landsc Ecol 31:1161–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0374-x
McIver JD, Stephens SL, Agee JK, et al (2013) Ecological effects of alternative fuel-reduction treatments: Highlights of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate study (FFS). Int. J. Wildl. Fire 22:63–82
Moore MM, Covington WW, Fulé PZ (1999) Reference conditions and ecological restoration: A Southwestern ponderosa pine perspective. Ecol. Appl. 9:1266–1277
Moore MM, Huffman DW, Fulé PZ, et al (2004) Comparison of Historical and Contemporary Forest Structure and Composition on Permanent Plots in Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. For Sci 50:162–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/50.2.162
MTBS (2017) MTBS Data Access: Fire Level Geospatial Data. In: Monit. Trends Burn Sev. Proj. (USDA For. Serv. Geol. Surv. http://mtbs.gov/direct-download. Accessed 1 Nov 2019
North M, Collins BM, Stephens S (2012) Using Fire to Increase the Scale, Benefits, and Future Maintenance of Fuels Treatments. J For 110:392–401. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.12-021
North MP, Stephens SL, Collins BM, et al (2015) Reform forest fire management : Agency incentives undermine policy effectiveness. Science (80-. ). 349:1280–1281
Povak NA, Hessburg PF, Salter RB (2018) Evidence for scale-dependent topographic controls on wildfire spread. Ecosphere 9:e02443. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2443
Prather JW, Dodd NL, Dickson BG, et al (2006) Landscape Models to Predict the Influence of Forest Structure on Tassel-Eared Squirrel Populations. J Wildl Manage 70:723–731. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[723:lmtpti]2.0.co;2
PRISM Climate Group OSU http://prism.oregonstate.edu
Puhlick JJ, Laughlin DC, Moore MM (2012) Factors influencing ponderosa pine regeneration in the southwestern USA. For Ecol Manage 264:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.002
Reynolds RT, Sánchez Meador AJ, Youtz JA, et al (2013) Restoring Composition and Structure in Southwestern Frequent-Fire Forests: A science-based framework for improving ecosystem resiliency. Gen Tech Rep RMRS-GTR-310 86
Ritter SM, Hoffman CM, Battaglia MA, et al (2020) Fine-scale fire patterns mediate forest structure in frequent-fire ecosystems. Ecosphere 11:e03177. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3177
Roccaforte JP, Fulé PZ, Covington WW (2010) Monitoring Landscape-Scale Ponderosa Pine Restoration Treatment Implementation and Effectiveness. Restor Ecol 18:820–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00508.x
Roccaforte JP, Huffman DW, Fulé PZ, et al (2015) Forest structure and fuels dynamics following ponderosa pine restoration treatments, White Mountains, Arizona, USA. For Ecol Manage 337:174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.001
Rodman KC, Sánchez Meador AJ, Huffman DW, Waring KM (2016) Reference conditions and historical fine-scale spatial dynamics in a dry mixed-conifer forest, Arizona, USA. For Sci 62:268–280. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.15-136
Rodman KC, Sánchez Meador AJ, Moore MM, Huffman DW (2017) Reference conditions are influenced by the physical template and vary by forest type: A synthesis of Pinus ponderosa-dominated sites in the southwestern United States. For Ecol Manage 404:316–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.012
Rutchey K, Godin J (2009) Determining an appropriate minimum mapping unit in vegetation mapping for ecosystem restoration: A case study from the Everglades, USA. Landsc Ecol 24:1351–1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9387-z
Sánchez Meador AJ, Moore MM, Bakker JD, Parysow PF (2009) 108 years of change in spatial pattern following selective harvest of a Pinus ponderosa stand in northern Arizona, USA. J Veg Sci 20:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2893.1999.00142.x-i1
Sánchez Meador AJ, Parysow PF, Moore MM (2011) A New Method for Delineating Tree Patches and Assessing Spatial Reference Conditions of Ponderosa Pine Forests in Northern Arizona. Restor Ecol 19:490–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00652.x
Schultz CA, Jedd T, Beam RD (2012) The Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program: A History and Overview of the First Projects. J For 110:381–391. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.11-082
Schumacher J, Hauglin M, Astrup R, Breidenbach J (2020) Mapping forest age using National Forest Inventory, airborne laser scanning, and Sentinel-2 data. For Ecosyst 7:. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-020-00274-9
Sijtsma K, Emons WHM (2010) Nonparametric statistical methods. In: International Encyclopedia of Education. John Wiley & Sons, pp 347–353
Šímová P, Gdulová K (2012) Landscape indices behavior: A review of scale effects. Appl Geogr 34:385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.01.003
Stanturf JA, Palik BJ, Dumroese RK (2014) Contemporary forest restoration: A review emphasizing function. For Ecol Manage 331:292–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.029
Stephens SL, Collins BM, Biber E, Fulé PZ (2016) U.S. Federal fire and forest policy: Emphasizing resilience in dry forests. Ecosphere 7:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1584
Stevens JT (2017) Scale-dependent effects of post-fire canopy cover on snowpack depth in montane coniferous forests. Ecol Appl 27:1888–1900. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1575
Stevens JT, Collins BM, Miller JD, et al (2017) Changing spatial patterns of stand-replacing fire in California conifer forests. For Ecol Manage 406:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.08.051
SWReGAP (2005) Southwest Regional GAP Analysis Project - Land Cover Descriptions. 250
Tarancón AA, Fulé PZ, Shive KL, et al (2014) Simulating post-wildfire forest trajectories under alternative climate and management scenarios. Ecol Appl 24:1626–1637. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1787.1
Theobald DM, Harrison-Atlas D, Monahan WB, Albano CM (2015) Ecologically-relevant maps of landforms and physiographic diversity for climate adaptation planning. PLoS One 10:e0143619. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143619
Timm BC, McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ganey JL (2016) Multi-scale Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) nest/roost habitat selection in Arizona and a comparison with single-scale modeling results. Landsc Ecol 31:1209–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0371-0
Turner MG, Gardner RH (2015) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: Pattern and process, second edition. Springer New York
Tuten MC, Sánchez Meador A, Fulé PZ (2015) Ecological restoration and fine-scale forest structure regulation in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. For Ecol Manage 348:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.032
Uuemaa E, Mander Ü, Marja R (2013) Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review. Ecol Indic 28:100–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.018
Veblen TT (2003) Historic range of variability of mountain forest ecosystems: Concepts and applications. For Chron 79:223–226. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc79223-2
Waltz AE, Fulé PZ, Covington WW, Moore MM (2003) Diversity in Ponderosa Pine Forest Structure Following Ecological Restoration Treatments. For Sci 49:885–900. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/49.6.885
Wan HY, Cushman SA, Ganey JL (2020) The effect of scale in quantifying fire impacts on species habitats. Fire Ecol 16:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-020-0068-2
Wasserman TN, Sánchez Meador AJ, Waltz AEM (2019) Grain and extent considerations are integral for monitoring landscape-scale desired conditions in fire-adapted forests. Forests 10:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10060465
Weber KT, Yadav R (2020) Spatiotemporal Trends in Wildfires across the Western United States (1950–2019). Remote Sens 12:2959. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12182959
Wickham J, Riitters KH (2019) Influence of high-resolution data on the assessment of forest fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 34:2169–2182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00820-z
Wright MN, Ziegler A (2017) Ranger: A fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. J Stat Softw 77:1–17. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v077.i01
Wu J (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: Scaling relations. Landsc Ecol 19:125–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000021711.40074.ae
Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 17:355–365
Wulder MA, Masek JG, Cohen WB, et al (2012) Opening the archive: How free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat. Remote Sens Environ 122:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.010
Ziegler JP, Hoffman C, Battaglia M, Mell W (2017) Spatially explicit measurements of forest structure and fire behavior following restoration treatments in dry forests. For Ecol Manage 386:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.002