Silica diagenesis in evaporitic environment
Origin of diagenetic silica nodules
Maliva (1987) suggested that quartz crystallizes after dissolution of the anhydrite nodule in the host rock, producing a nodule that consists of solid quartz, with, in some examples, a euhedral crystal-lined central cavity. During silica replacement of the sulphates, the rate of silica precipitation is controlled by anhydrite dissolution and pore fluid chemistry (pH) (Fig. 7) (Demangeon, 1966; Perthuisot et al., 1978; Stamataki, 1989). In the samples studied (Fig. 8), silica replacement began in the outer parts of the anhydrite nodules and proceeded inward displacively towards the centre of the nodules. The replacement of the outer parts of the nodules resulted in a decrease of pore water salinity and pH that enabled silica precipitation (for example Touray and Cheghan, 1984; Maliva and Siever, 1988). The remaining anhydrite was dissolved later after the decrease in pH and dilution of the pore fluids that previously had curtailed inward growth of silica. This situation led to the creation of a central cavity in the nodule, in which other minerals can precipitate. This process implies that the silica replacement was basically controlled by the chemistry of the pore fluids during diagenesis (Henchiri et al., 2015). Moreover, the outer parts of the anhydrite, which are the most altered and leached and implying more dilute conditions (cf. Alonso-Zarza et al., 2002), had lower pH values (> 7 and < 9) that permitted silica precipitation in the form of rims. In contrast, the pH was highly alkaline (> 9) in the innermost parts of the anhydrite nodules. The high pH did not allow the continuation of anhydrite groundmass silicification, and this pH-controlled process was probably responsible for the “geode” features (Tucker, 1976; Maliva, 1987). This model also explains why silicification (or certification) of the anhydrite nodules always proceeded inward and not outward. It is feasible that silica precipitation, in this case, could have been a continuous steady process if the dissolution (or the shifting of alkalinity) of the innermost anhydrite proceeded as fast as the silica-rich fluid was supplied.
According to Schmidt et al. (2001), Pore fluid pH can strongly affect the ratio (Si–O–Si/Si–OH) (i.e. Q4/(Q3+Q2)) through silica-water surface chemistry and silica solubility and precipitation (Knauss & Wolery, 1988; Brady & Walther, 1989; Dove & Elston, 1992; House & Orr, 1992; Berger et al., 1994; Dove, 1994; Mazer & Walther, 1994). The 29Si spectrum intensity is known to decrease with increasing pH (Carroll et al., 2002). Silica dissolution - precipitation may be pH controlled: the quartz geodes may have formed in alkaline high pH conditions that originated from the electrolyte (Berger et al., 1994) and sodium chloride solutions (Dove, 1994) in ambient fluids and evaporites. The resulting silicified groundmasses are predominantly related to pore-water silica supersaturation and the force of crystallization (as defined by Maliva and Siever (1988)) during their formation.
The dense form of the silica rind appears to have precluded any silica diffusion after the pore fluid chemistry-induced barrier to inward growth of the silica. On the other hand, siliceous phases have formed as later mineral phases in the cavities that were produced by the late innermost anhydrite dissolution. This poses the following questions that can be deciphered only by extensive field and laboratory work: why did silica cementation not occlude the entire cavity (without alkalinity constraints) and thus produce silicified bodies that resemble chert nodules (i.e. 9095% chertified)? Was growth of the chert nodule aborted? Gomez-Alday et al. (2002) posed similar questions when considering the origin of quartz geodes in northern Spain.
The direct silicification of sulphate evaporite nodules into silica nodules, like those resulting from carbonate nodules chertification (characterized by high silica replacements percentage exceeding 98 %), seems to be constrained by the chemical barrier existing within evaporitic nodules preventing the entire silicification of nodule. only partial replacements can take place leading to geodic nodules by creation of a <<diagenetic closed system>> (Tucker, 1976; Henchiri and Shimi, 2006) in which, silica inward growth is curtailed.
Pore fluid chemical barrier
Practically, pore water pH can affect strongly the silica precipitation, which, in our case, can be explained by its clear tendency to be pH-controlled during replacement of sulphate evaporites (gypsum/anhydrite nodules). Sulphates and chlorides-rich (NaCl) inclusions and salty connate fluids in the innermost parts of evaporite nodule are responsible for silica curtailed growth and the generation of “geode” feature. Alkaline high-pH conditions in innermost parts of evaporite nodule are interpreted to have resulted largely from the electrolyte (Berger et al., 1994) and sodium chloride solutions (Dove, 1994) included within evaporite bodies in different proportions. These components can provide locally highly concentrated alkaline solutions with pH >9 that can nullify or make silicification difficult. That is what makes differences in silicification patterns and fabrics between the outer and inner parts of some nodules.
Origin of megaquartz variety related to evaporites
As explained above, the incomplete silicification of evaporite nodules can lead to that silica is a difficult mineral to form in high-pH environment chemistry (with some exceptions, i.e. Lake Magadi and Lake Bogoria: microbial-induced silicification (Renault et al., 2002)); thereby the megaquartz crystals, which represent the last silica phase precipitated in direct contact with evaporite phase, were developed probably before the total dissolution of remnant evaporites as indicated by the richness of trapped evaporite inclusions in quartz. The palissade-like megaquartz crystals observed in the inner cavity of geodes may not necessarily express a <<diagenetic relief>> of silicification but it’s rather interpreted as a sign of constrained process, because silica-rich diagenetic fluids in sulphate or Mg-rich environment tend to precipitate the well-developed, single or double terminated euhedral megaquartz variety. Higher alkalinity degrees implies euhedral megaquartz with large facetted crystal variety indicative of low growth rates (Siever, 1962 ; Ernst and Clavert, 1969 ; Maliva and Siever, 1988). In literature, it has been found that the slowest growing crystals are the crystals more likely to be the largest ones. Similar situations with unanswered questions about euhedral shape of quartz are reviewed in Demangeon, (1966); Friedman & Shukla, (1979); Touray & Chegham, (1984); Fabricius, (1984); Maliva, (1987); Eilon et al., (1988); Ulmer-Scholle, (1993); Chafetz & Zhang, (1998); Alonso-Zarza, (2002); El Khoriby, (2005). However, the close association of euhedral megaquartz variety to evaporite or Mg-rich environments suggests that this silica habit variety is the most competent in such environments.
The relationship between silica diagenesis and evaporites is not yet well enough understood. Folk and Pittman (1971) and Gomez-Alday et al. (2002) have reported the well-crystallized euhedral forms of quartz in relation to evaporite to low silica concentrations supply during silicification. Similar situations with non-resolved questions about euhedral shape of quartz in relation to evaporite are reviewed in Table 1. However, the explanation of the close association of euhedral megaquartz variety with evaporate and/or Mg-rich environments is is found in the physical properties of this silica habit (Henchiri et al, 2015) such as its crystallinity degree (Murata & Norman, 1976) and its low specific surface area and ultramicroporosity (Bustillo et al., 1993) that make it the most mineralogically competent and the most chemically resistant in such environments.
Silica supply
Clocchiati and Sassi, (1972) and Beji-Sassi et al., (2001) reported traces of Paleocene-Eocene volcanic/ hydrothermal venting activity (glassy inclusions in quartz crystals) in Gafsa Basin within the phosphorites that underlie the studied sediments near the Oued El Khasfa. This volcanogenic / hydrothermal contribution of silica supply for silica nodule formation, especially during the early diagenetic stages of silicification of the anhydrite nodules, is of major significance. Although dissolved and reworked, most silica of volcanic origin is rapidly altered and transformed into authigenic zeolites (clinoptilolite), as suggested by Sassi & Jacob (1972) and Henchiri (2007).
Silica-rich diagenetic fluid can be supplied through clay mineral diagenesis (i.e. transformation of smectite to hydrous mica or illite according to two possible reaction stoichiometries) as suggested by Towe (1962), Heling (1978), Boles & Franks (1979) and Dietzel, (2000). The host sediments are clay-poor with only minor amounts of smectite and kaolinite. Thus, the provenance of soluble silica is thought more likely to be derived, during late diagenesis, from the pressure solution of silt and sand grains, or from feldspar and mica dissolution in the Oligo-Miocene continental sand, silt and clay-rich formations (Sehib, Beglia and Segui) that overlie the host sediments. Silica-rich fluids moved downwards and reached the host sediments through repeated silica dissolution, transport and repricipitation (Makhlouf et al., 2015).