Descriptive analysis
Descriptive characteristics of the respondents are presented in Table 1. More than half of the respondents were female (61%; n = 477), and more than half were married (78%; n = 609). Most of our older-adult respondents (96.5%; n = 754) reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with their diet, with only 3.5% (n = 27) reporting that they were dissatisfied with their diet. Meanwhile, 48.3% (n = 377) of the study’s sample of older adults reported that their oral health was better than good, and 51.7% (n = 404) reported that their oral health was not good enough. In terms of educational attainment, 8.7% (n = 68) were illiterate, 16.3% (n = 127) had graduated from elementary school, 37% (n = 289) had graduated from middle school, 26.5% (n = 207) had graduated from high school, and 11.5% (n = 90) had graduated from college. The average age of the respondents was 71.33 years (SD = 7.03). Their mean score of depression was 13.18 (SD = 4.41), indicating symptoms of low depression. In addition, the respondents’ average body mass index was 24.68 (SD = 3.2), which according to the World Health Organization criteria was in the normal range. The respondents’ average monthly income was 5271.28 yuan (SD = 4047.2). Their average number of chronic diseases was 1.67 (SD = 1.65), and their mean score for their self-rated health was 3.56 (SD = 0.82).
Bivariate association analyses
Table 2 presents the results of the bivariate tests between the study variables, with depression as the dependent variable. The results revealed that the socioeconomic variables were significantly related to depression in our respondents. Table 2 shows that the elderly adults who were married had a lower level of depression than those who were not married did. It was also found that relatively higher levels of education, higher incomes, higher scores for oral health, greater dietary satisfaction, higher self-rated health scores, and higher body mass index scores were related to lower levels of depression. In addition, age and the number of diseases were found to be positively associated with depression. However, gender was not found to make a difference in depression in our sample.
The mediation analyses
Table 3 presents the conditional indirect effect that oral health had on depression through dietary satisfaction, with moderating by body mass index. The first part in Table 3 shows the effect of oral health on the mediator (dietary satisfaction). The results reveal that relatively better oral health was associated with a higher level of dietary satisfaction (path a; B = 0.06, SE = 0.03, 95%CI [0.01, 0.11]). The second part in Table 3 shows the effect of oral health on depression, after taking into account all of the covariates, mediators, and moderated mediation effects. The results indicated that oral health had a significant direct effect on depression (path c) even after including the covariates, mediators, and moderators (B=-0.22, SE = 0.11, 95%CI [-0.44, -0.01]). The results also revealed that relatively higher dietary satisfaction was related to lower levels of depression (path b; B = − 0.61, SE = 0.15, 95%CI [-0.89, -0.32]). In addition, an interaction effect between dietary satisfaction and body mass index on depression was found to be statistically significant (path d; B = 0.47, SE = 0.15, 95%CI [0.18, 0.76]). Moreover, the number of chronic diseases that a respondent had was found to be positively associated with depression (B = 0.53, SE = 0.10, p = 0.03), whereas income (B=-0.34, SE = 0.16, p < 0.001) and self-rated health (B=-1.21, SE = 0.20, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with depression, and no significant association was found between depression and the other covariates. The R2 was 0.222 in this model, which means that the model explained 22.2% of the variance in depression.
Oral health was found to have a significant total effect, direct effect, and indirect effect on depression, and the results are presented in Table 4 (total effect: B = -0.28, SE = 0.11, 95%CI [-0.501, -0.055], direct effect: B = -0.24, SE = 0.11, 95%CI [-0.460, -0.017], and indirect effect: B = -0.04, SE = 0.02, 95%CI [-0.09, -0.002]). Thus, dietary satisfaction partially mediated the relationship between oral health and depression, and the indirect effect accounted for 14.28% of the total effect.
The moderated mediation analyses
A structural equation model using AMOS software was established, and the details of the moderated mediation model are shown in Fig. 1. The moderating effect of body mass index between dietary satisfaction and depression was significant (path d; B = 0.47, SE = 0.15, 95%CI [0.18, 0.76]). The fit indexes indicated an adequate model fit (CMIN/DF = 2.938, GFI = 0.984, AGFI = 0.953, IFI = 0.939, CFI = 0.936, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.037).
The result of the moderator effect, as visualized by the Johnson-Neyman technique, is shown in Fig. 2. As this figure shows, the effect of dietary satisfaction on depression was moderated by body mass index, and the critical value of the moderating variable was 26.699, which means that when the body mass index was higher than 26.699, the effect of dietary satisfaction on depression was not significant, because the confidence interval contained zero. When the value of body mass index was lower than the critical value, however, the confidence interval did not contain zero, thus indicating that the effect of dietary satisfaction on depression was significant, and the slope of the effect was negative, meaning that the greater the individual’s dietary satisfaction was, the less depressed they would have been. Moreover, the slope of the line for the effect of dietary satisfaction on depression decreased as body mass index increased, indicating that the effect of dietary satisfaction on depression was much greater in people with relatively lower body mass index than it was in people with higher body mass index.