Free sugar intake and associated factors among Sri Lankan preschool children

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1729626/v1

Abstract

Background: Excessive free sugar intake tends to be associated with unpleasant health consequences, such as dental caries and unhealthy weight gain in children, as well as a number of noncommunicable diseases in adults. The WHO suggests that the best method for addressing these issues is to reduce free sugar consumption throughout life, in order to be successful, these measures should be implemented as early as possible. This makes the early formative years of preschool an important point for possible intervention.  To confirm this, baseline information on current sugar intake levels is needed, as well as identification of factors associated with high levels of consumption.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the district of Colombo, Sri Lanka. The probability proportionate to size technique combined with cluster sampling was used to select a representative sample of 813 children aged 04-05-years from 82 preschools. We developed, and validated a quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to assess free sugar consumption. Data on correlated factors were collected from caregivers using a pre-tested self-administered questionnaire.

Results: Based on the data, the daily median (IQR) free sugar intake of preschool children was 57.9 (33.2-95.8) grams/day (approximately to 14.5 (8.3-23.9) teaspoons/day) or 21.1% (12.5%-34.9%) of their daily energy requirements. The WHO recommends limiting sugar intake to less than 5% of total energy intake; however, the current level is fourfold, and 96% of children consume higher percentage of energy from free sugar than recommended.  In terms of total daily sugar consumption, bakery products accounted for 27%, followed by biscuits (15%), and table sugar (15%). Increasing maternal education level significantly reduced sugar intake (p=0.04). Children of other ethnicities ate more sugar than the Sinhala children (p= 0.01). There was higher sugar intake among those who ate while returning from preschool (p<0.001), while watching television (p<0.001), and those who had school-going siblings (p=0.02).

Conclusion: Among preschool children, free sugar consumption levels were very high and most of the children consumed more sugar than is recommended; which warranted urgent actions to curb sugar intake among them.

Introduction

The modern food processing industry has introduced many unhealthy ingredients into the human diet, including a massive amount of free sugar, which presents an increasing challenge to public health, especially in developing countries[1]. A growing body of evidence suggests that excess free sugar plays a dominant role in causing a number of noncommunicable diseases (NCD), including obesity[2][3], diabetes[4][5], cardiovascular diseases[6][7], several forms of cancers[8][9], and dental caries[10][11][12]. Although excess free sugar poses numerous health risks throughout our lives, dental caries and obesity have been identified as the primary consequences in childhood[13][14]. In Sri Lanka, early childhood caries are a major health problem, affecting approximately 63% of five-year-old children[15]. Childhood obesity is also a growing health problem, particularly among adolescents[16]. Therefore, addressing rising rates of NCDs via sugar policy is a key concern, especially in developing countries that are disproportionately affected by this challenge[17]. Sri Lanka is one such context in which addressing the consumption of free sugars in the early years is an important issue that underpins efforts to prevent both dental caries and wider health impacts.

The WHO has issued guidelines that recommend maintaining free sugar intake below 10% of total energy intake throughout life, with the aim of reducing the risk of NCDs in both adults and children, focusing specifically on preventing and controlling unhealthy weight gain and dental caries[13]. In light of the low-quality evidence relating sugar to dental caries, they conditionally recommend that free sugar intake should be reduced to less than 5% of daily energy intake[13]. For this purpose, the World Health Organization (WHO) defines free sugar as "all monosaccharides, and disaccharides added to foods and beverages by the manufacturer, cook or the consumer and sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices and fruit juice concentrates"[13]. In this case, intrinsic sugars, which are present within the cell structures, were not included because of their low bioavailability. If Sri Lanka follows the WHO recommendations, an essential first step would be to establish the current level of sugar intake in the country.

According to current understanding, taking a life-course approach is the best strategy to combat the onset of diet-related chronic diseases[18][19]. Dietary habits in early life are crucial for determining eating behaviours in adolescence and adulthood[20]. As preschool years mark a significant milestone in lifestyle development, shaping children 's eating habits at this early age is relatively easy[20][21]. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess the intake of free sugar among preschool children aged four and five in order to plan interventions and preventive measures for the enormous problem of early childhood caries, with the secondary goal of informing preventive interventions related to wider sugar-related diseases throughout their lifetime. The study had two objectives: first, to describe the level of free sugar intake in a key age group in Sri Lanka and second, to identify factors associated with excessive sugar intake. The second objective was to identify potential determinants of sugar intake habits as a prerequisite to applying health promotion principles aimed at achieving sustainable behavioural changes to curb excessive free sugar intake.

Methods

This study was approved by the ethics review committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo (EC-17-001), and written informed consent was obtained from all caregivers who participated in the study.

Study population and sampling

A preschool-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Colombo District, Sri Lanka. A sample size of 860 was calculated based on a formula for calculating population proportions[22] after adjusting for cluster sampling errors and possible nonresponses. A total of 82 clusters (preschools) were selected from 16 administrative divisions in the district, using a probability proportionate-to-size technique. The study inclusion criteria were pre-schoolers aged four–five years who had been living in the Colombo district from birth, whose primary caregiver was available, and who were not on a special dietary plan. Of the 860 invited, 813 pairs of children and their primary caregivers participated in the study (response rate, 94%).

Study instrument

Study instruments

In the literature, several dietary assessment methods have been used to assess the relationship between diet and disease; among these, the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) has several advantages. Firstly, the FFQ assesses the normal daily intake of particular foods or beverages [23][24] excluding short-term variations related to seasonal changes, special occasions, or illnesses [25][23]. Additionally, this is the only method that allows for retrospective evaluation of dietary data over an extended period[23][26], which makes it helpful for exploring the relationship between sugar intake levels, dental caries status, and the general nutritional status of children. Furthermore, FFQs are relatively simple and easy to administer in large-scale community-based studies, with comparatively little burden on respondents[23].

We collected dietary data using a 67-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and 24-hour dietary record (24hDR) for three days. A food frequency questionnaire was developed for this study using data from 513 preschool children, and food items were selected that contributed 95% to the variation in free sugar intake. It was validated among 108 preschool children against a three-day dietary record and was found to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring free sugar intake. Based on a wide literature search, the researchers developed a questionnaire to assess factors that might be associate with free sugar intake in children. The questionnaire was pretested on 20 preschool children who lived outside the Colombo District.

Data collection

Data were collected in groups of 10 at each preschool. Trained interviewers visited the preschools and administered questionnaires to primary caregivers of the selected children. The investigators gave clear instructions on how to fill out the FFQ based on the child's usual diet during the past three months followed by a practice session. The participants filled out the FFQs themselves while the investigators demonstrated the portion sizes in the PowerPoint presentation. After providing the necessary directions, the 24hDR was distributed for completion at home on one weekend day and two weekdays, which were collected later.

Data analysis

For the purpose of the current study, the researchers compiled a comprehensive sugar composition database for all food and beverage items in the FFQ using standard methods[27][28] because the available food composition databases for Sri Lanka do not provide the sugar content for most sugary foods in the FFQ.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.

  • Data obtained from the FFQ were used to calculate the amount of sugar intake. This was calculated as follows:

Sugar intake from particular = Amount of intake X Frequency of X Free sugar concentration

Food/ beverage item intake of the item

The daily intake of free sugar was calculated by dividing the weekly intake by seven and the monthly intake by 30.4. The total daily intake was calculated by adding the daily sugar intake values for each item.

  • The Three 24hDR were used to calculate the composite frequency of sugar intake. We counted the number of times a child consumed sugary items per day without considering how many items they combined at a time; this was called ‘composite frequency’. The average daily frequency was calculated. For instance, when a child consumed a biscuit, a piece of cake, and milk with sugar at tea time, the frequency was taken as one (as per the FFQ, this would be considered three times).

  • In this study, the total energy intake of participants was used to calculate the percentage of energy intake from free sugar. As this was beyond the scope of this study, the energy requirement of the child was calculated based on age and body weight as a proxy measure. Approximately–04-06-years-old child requires 82 kcal/kg/day[29]. The calculations were performed as follows:

  • To identify the factors associated with sugar intake levels, bivariate analysis was first performed, followed by multivariate analysis using multiple regression models with backward elimination.


Results

The study sample was comprised of 04-05-year-old preschool children; the majority (70%) were four years old (48-59-months). An equal number of girls and boys participated in this study. 

Amount of free sugar intake 

As shown in Table 1, the mean (SD) and median (IQR) amount of free sugar intake were 79 (68.6) g/day and 57.9(33.2- 95.8) g/day (equivalent approximately to 14.5 (8.3-23.9) teaspoons/day), respectively. Free sugar contributed 21.1% (12.5%-35.9%) of total energy intake on average. The median (IQR) composite frequency of sugar intake was four times (2.7-6.1) per day. 

Table 1

 The amount and of free sugar intake among the participants (N= 813)

 

Sugar energy* as a percentage of total energy requirement**

Amount of sugar intake (g/day)

Frequency of sugar intake (times/ day)

Range

0.5-192.3

2.5 - 520.0

0 - 15.8

Mean (SD)

29.0 (25.3)

79.0 (68.6)

4.9 (3.2)

Median (IQR)

21.1 (12.5 - 35.9)

57.9 (33.2 - 95.8)

4.0 (2.7 - 6.1)

*Sugar energy= amount of sugar (g) x 4 Kcal/ g (1g of sugar provides 4kCal of energy)

**Total energy requirement= bodyweight x energy requirement/ kg body weight/ day

***IQ range = Inter-Quartile Range 

The percentage contribution of different sugary food and beverage groups to total free sugar intake

The contribution of each food and beverage group to total free sugar intake is shown in Figure 1. To emphasize excess consumption, biscuits were analysed separately from the other bakery products.

The main contributors to the total intake of free sugar were bakery products (28%), followed by biscuits (15%), and table sugar (15%).

Figure 2 shows the percentage of participants who consumed each food category at least once a month.  

The largest percentage of children consumed desserts (96.8%), followed by biscuits (95.6%) and bakery products (95.6%).

 Factors associated with the amount of free sugar intake 

Multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination was performed after bivariate analysis to identify factors associated with high free sugar intake. As shown in Table 2, the final model retained six predictor variables.

R2 value for the final model was 0.215, indicating a 21.5% variance in the total sugar intake. This model showed an F value of 25.662 with a statistically significant p-value (p< 0.01).

Table 2

An analysis of multiple logistic regression models relating total free sugar intake to the factors associated with it

 

 

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

Beta

t

Sig.

(p)

95% Confidence Interval for B

 

 

B

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

 

(Constant)

69.27

15.979

 

4.335

<0.001

37.8

100.658
  1. Ethnicity

    Sinhala

    Other ethnic groups*

17.27

6.882

0.09

2.51

0.012

3.7

30.8
  1. Maternal education level

   Up to GCE O/L** bellow

   Up to GCE A/L*** above

-9.82

4.792

-0.08

-2.04

0.041

-19.2

-0.4
  1. School-going siblings

   No

   Yes

10.39

4.754

0.08

2.18

0.029

1.1

19.7
  1. Eating while returning from preschool

    No

    Yes

38.46

5.245

0.28

7.33

<0.001

28.2

48.7
  1. Eating while watching TV

   No

   Yes

47.47

7.269

0.25

6.53

<0.001

33.2

61.7
  1. Dental clinic attendance

   No

   Yes

-19.2

5.093

-0.14

-3.78

<0.001

-29.3

-9.3

*Non-Sinhala- Tamil, Moor and others amalgamated

**GCE O/L- General Certificate of Education Ordinary Level (Grade 11)

**GCE A/L- General Certificate of Education Advanced Level (Grade 13)

  1. Predictors- Ethnicity, Religion, Maternal education level, Presence of school-going siblings, eating while coming back from preschool, eating while watching TV, Visited Dental clinics
  2. Dependent variable: Total free sugar intake

R square= 0.215        Adjusted R Square= 0.207

Maternal educational level and dental clinic attendance were significantly and negatively associated with free sugar intake. A child whose mother had obtained at least G.C.E. (advanced level) education was likely to consume significantly less sugar than a child whose mother had obtained up to G.C.E. (ordinary level) (p=0.04). Children who visited a dental clinic at least once had a significantly lower sugar intake than those who had never visited a dental clinic (p< 0.001). 

Ethnicity other than Sinhala (p=0.01), the presence of school-going siblings (p=0.02), eating habits such as eating while returning from preschool (p<0.001), and eating while watching television (p<0.001) were significantly associated with high intake levels of sugar.

As shown in Table 3, free sugar intake from particular groups of sugary foods was significantly related to the regular presence of the same group of foods at home.

Table 3

 The relationship between free sugar intake from different groups of sugary foods and the presence of the same group of foods at home on a regular basis

 

Number

Mean

Median

Significance

Biscuits

 

Sugar from biscuits

 

  Yes

698

12.1

5.8

z=3.77

  No

115

8.3

5.6

p<0.001

Sugar sweetened beverages

 

Sugar from sugar sweetened beverages

 

  Yes

182

8.3

3.7

z=3.55

  No

631

5.6

2.3

p<0.001

Chocolate confectionery

 

Sugar from chocolate confectionery

 

   Yes

201

6.1

2.7

z=3.77

   No

612

4.3

1.4

p<0.001

Fruits

 

Total free sugar

 

  Yes

703

73.9

53.2

z= 1.99

  No

110

83.3

66.3

p=0.04

Total

813

 

 

 

Among those who regularly have biscuits (p<0.001), beverages (p<0.001), and chocolates (p<0.001) at home, sugar intake from relevant items was significantly higher than that of their counterparts. The opposite pattern was observed among children for whom fruits were available at home on a regular basis, who had a significantly lower intake of total free sugar than those who did not (p=0.04). 

Discussion

Among the many other factors, assessing dietary intake is critical for understanding how nutrition plays a role in preventing or promoting diseases. This paper discusses the extremely high intake of free sugar among preschool children in Sri Lankan along with possible associated factors. The limitations of the study include the intrinsic limitations of the methods of dietary assessment used, since both the FFQ and 24hDR rely on memory and are therefore susceptible to overestimations and underestimations. There may be some responder bias in reporting lower levels of sugar consumption because of the fear of being judged as a caregiver. The final multiple logistic regression model explained only 21.5% of the variance in sugar intake. This highlights the need for further research on the wider aspects of sugar consumption. Consistency of foods, timing before bedtime, and other methods can offset the high sugar consumption (such as toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste). It must also be highlighted that the study was undertaken in Columbo, which is just one area of Sri Lanka, which may limit its generalizability. However, the response rate of the survey population is very high.

This is the first study to assess sugar intake in Sri Lanka and is focused on sugar consumption among pre-schoolers. Similar studies are rare in the available literature, with the majority of published studies from other countries examining sugar intake across a variety of age groups, methodologies, and the type of sugar they refer to, which limits meaningful comparisons and analysis. Most published studies have assessed the intake of added sugar. Although the current study focused on free sugar intake, most food and beverage items in the FFQ were processed foods that contained only added sugars (65 of 67 items). The free sugar intake calculated in the present study can be considered comparable to the added sugar intake.

To obtain a sense of Sri Lankan sugar consumption, national sugar availability per capita was the only figure available, at 82.19 g/person/day in 2016[30], which approximately resembles the findings of our study at 79 g/day.

Finnish dietary surveys conducted from to 1998–2003 found that dietary sucrose consumption among 04-year-olds was 53 g/day[31]. Our study population consumed more free sugar than that (79 g/day). These findings are consistent with the findings of a 2020 multicenter European study of free sugar intake among children aged 02-09-years, which identified consumption at 81 g/day for boys and 77 g/day for girls[32].

During the period 2005 to 2008, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of the United States found that on average, preschool-aged boys consumed 13.5% of their calories from added sugars, whereas young girls consumed 13.1%[33]. An analysis of the added sugar intake among 04-13-year-old children in China, Mexico and the USA, conducted in 2018, found that added sugar intake comprised 3% in China, 13% in Mexico and 18% in the USA of total energy intake[34], while we found this measure to be 21.1% for our Sri Lankan preschool population, which is significantly higher than most other contexts above. According to the current study, bakery products, including biscuits, contributed the most to total sugar intake, similar to a study among Chinese children that found that rolls, buns, cakes, and pies contributed most to the added sugar intake. Conversely, two Western countries, Mexico and the United States, reported the highest sugar intake from sugar-sweetened beverages[34], and a European multicenter study found that fruit juices accounted for more free sugar intake, followed by soft drinks and dairy products[32].

Regular availability of a particular food group at home was associated with a higher sugar intake for that food group (Table 4). The findings were similar to those of Patrick and Nicklas (2005)[35], suggesting that children mostly eat what they can get their hands on. A second important finding was that those who had fruits available regularly consumed less sugar than did those who did not. An analogous effect of increased fruit and vegetable intake on sugar intake was demonstrated in earlier studies[36][37][38]. Therefore, public health messages should focus on encourage parents to make healthier alternatives to sugary foods and drinks available to their children at home.

One of the objectives of this study was to compare the level of sugar intake among the study population and the WHO guidelines on free sugar intake[13]. In the current population of study population, majority of children exceeded the recommended intake, 82.7% (n = 672) consumed free sugar exceeding 10% of total daily energy intake, whereas 96.3% (n = 783) consumed more than 5% of their daily calories through free sugars.

Factors associated with the pattern of sugar intake

Local health authorities are seeking methods to curb sugar consumption. Sustainable behavioural changes can be achieved by identifying and addressing the underlying determinants of high sugar intake. This study identified a few of these determinants.

The final model of the multivariate analysis retained only six variables: ethnicity, maternal education level, presence of school-going siblings, eating while returning from preschool, eating while watching TV, and dental clinic attendance (Table 4).

  • Ethnicity: The sugar intake of Sinhala children is lower than that of children from other ethnic groups, mainly Tamils or Moors. Several studies have shown the variation in sugar intake among different ethnicities[35][39].

  • Maternal education level: This is a more important factor in determining child-related behaviours. Increased maternal education leads to a reduction in children’s sugar intake. Several studies supported this finding[39][40].

  • Presence of school-going siblings: Associated with high sugar intake. There is no apparent reason for this association.

  • Eating habits: It was found that Eating at the time of returning from preschool or watching television was associated with high sugar consumption. Children are more likely to consume sugary foods and beverages on these occasions. These two factors together explain a 12.6% variation in sugar intake, which was also proven in previous studies[41][42]. These are essential aspects to highlight when instructing caregivers on sugar-reducing techniques, and caregivers should be encouraged to seek healthier alternatives.

  • Dental clinic attendance: This also showed a negative association between sugar intake and a negative β coefficient. This may be due to their advice in dental clinics, which makes them more concerned about their oral health.

Conclusion

Compared with children in most other countries, the current population consumes egregiously more free sugar, and the majority of children surpass the WHO-recommended sugar intake levels. Therefore, a robust sugar-restriction program is necessary for young children in Sri Lanka. National policies and restrictions are needed to regulate the marketing, production, advertising of sugary foods, reduce the sugar content of food and beverages and appropriately display sugar levels on food labels. To tackle this problem at the local level, we should aim to raise awareness among mothers about sugar and its effects on children’s health, as well as make low/free sugar ready-to-eat food items readily available in the market at an affordable price.

Abbreviations

95% CI- 95% Confidence Interval

FFQ – Food Frequency Questionnaire

24hDR – 24 Hour Dietary Recall

IQR- Inter-Quartile Range

NCD- Noncommunicable diseases

P – probability value

WHO – World Health Organization

Declarations

References

  1. BM P, LS A, SW N. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. 2012 Jan;70(1):3–21. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22221213/
  2. Ludwig DS, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL. Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: A prospective, observational analysis. 2001 Feb 17;357(9255):505–8.
  3. Stanhope KL. Sugar consumption, metabolic disease and obesity: The state of the controversy [Internet]. Vol. 53, Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. Taylor and Francis Ltd; 2016. p. 52–67. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/10408363.2015.1084990
  4. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després JP, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk [Internet]. Vol. 121, Circulation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 1356–64. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185
  5. Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Sautin Y, Nakagawa T, Feig DI, Kang D-H, et al. Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease 13 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/86/4/899/4649308
  6. Johnson RK, Appel LJ, Brands M, Howard B V., Lefevre M, Lustig RH, et al. Dietary sugars intake and cardiovascular health a scientific statement from the american heart association [Internet]. Vol. 120, Circulation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. p. 1011–20. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192627
  7. Yang Q, Zhang Z, Gregg EW, Flanders WD, Merritt R, Hu FB. Added sugar intake and cardiovascular diseases mortality among us adults. 2014 Apr 1;174(4):516–24. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/
  8. Michaud DS, Liu S, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS. Dietary Sugar, Glycemic Load, and Pancreatic Cancer Risk in a Prospective Study [Internet]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/94/17/1293/2519872
  9. Correa P. Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Gastric Cancer. 2003.
  10. Touger-Decker R, van Loveren C. Sugars and dental caries. [Internet]. Vol. 78, The American journal of clinical nutrition. Oxford Academic; 2003. p. 881–92. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/78/4/881S/4690063
  11. Moynihan PJ, Kelly SAM. Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake: Systematic review to inform WHO guidelines [Internet]. Vol. 93, Journal of Dental Research. SAGE PublicationsSage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 2014. p. 8–18. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022034513508954
  12. Sheiham A, James WPT, Sheiham, A., James, W. P. A reappraisal of the quantitative relationship between sugar intake and dental caries: the need for new criteria for developing goals for sugar intake. 2014 Sep 16;14(1):863.
  13. Thomson MAARJ. Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. 2018;57(6):1716–22.
  14. Hayden C, Bowler JO, Chambers S, Freeman R, Humphris G, Richards D, et al. Obesity and dental caries in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. Vol. 41, Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013. p. 289–308. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cdoe.12014
  15. Ministry of Health Sri Lanka. National Oral Health Survey Sri Lanka 2015- 2016 [Internet]. 2018. Available from: http://www.health.gov.lk/moh_final/english/public/elfinder/files/publications/2019/NOHS2015-2016.pdf
  16. Statistics D of C and. Demographic and Health Survey Sri Lanka. 2016;157–84.
  17. Mohammed Shariful Islam S, Dannemann Purnat T, Thi Anh Phuong N, Mwingira U, Schacht K, Fröschl G. Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in developing countries: a symposium report. 2014;10:81. Available from: http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/10/1/81
  18. Lynch J, Smith GD. A LIFE COURSE APPROACH TO CHRONIC DISEASE EPIDEMIOLOGY. 2005 Apr 21;26(1):1–35. Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144505
  19. Darnton-Hill I, Nishida C, James W. A life course approach to diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases.
  20. Birch L, Savage JS, Ventura A. Influences on the Development of Children’s Eating Behaviours: From Infancy to Adolescence. 2007;68(1):s1–56. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19430591
  21. Savage JS, Fisher JO, Birch LL. Parental influence on eating behavior: Conception to adolescence. In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. NIH Public Access; 2007. p. 22–34. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2531152/
  22. Lachenbruch PA, Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S. Sample Size Determination in Health Studies: A Practical Manual. Vol. 86, Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1991. p. 1149.
  23. Shim J-S, Oh K, Kim HC. Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies. 2014 Jul 22;36:e2014009. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC4154347/?report=abstract
  24. Johnson RK. Dietary intake--how do we measure what people are really eating? Vol. 10 Suppl 1, Obesity research. 2002.
  25. Moghames P, Hammami N, Hwalla N, Yazbeck N, Shoaib H, Nasreddine L, et al. Validity and reliability of a food frequency questionnaire to estimate dietary intake among Lebanese children. 2016 Jan 12;15(1):4. Available from: http://www.nutritionj.com/content/15/1/4
  26. García Rodríguez M, Romero Saldaña M, Alcaide Leyva JM, Moreno Rojas R, Molina Recio G. Design and validation of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for the nutritional evaluation of food intake in the Peruvian Amazon. 2019 Dec 19;38(1):1–11. Available from: https://jhpn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41043-019-0199-8
  27. ASEAN Manual of Food Analysis - [PDF Document] [Internet]. Available from: https://vdocuments.mx/asean-manual-of-food-analysis.html
  28. Merchant AT, Dehghan M. Food composition database development for between country comparisons. 2006;5(1):1–8.
  29. Rigo J. Body composition during the first year of life. Nestlé Nutrition workshop series. Paediatric programme. 2006.
  30. Department of Census and Statistics of Sri Lanka. Food balance sheet 2013-2017. 2017. 45 p.
  31. Erkkola M, Kronberg-Kippilä C, Kyttälä P, Lehtisalo J, Reinivuo H, Tapanainen H, et al. Sucrose in the diet of 3-year-old Finnish children: Sources, determinants and impact on food and nutrient intake. 2009;101(8):1209–17.
  32. Graffe MIM, Pala V, De Henauw S, Eiben G, Hadjigeorgiou C, Iacoviello L, et al. Dietary sources of free sugars in the diet of European children: the IDEFICS Study. 2020;59(3):979–89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-01957-y
  33. McGuire, Shelley, Ervin RB, Kit BK, Carroll MD OC. Consumption of added sugar among U.S. children and adolescents, 2005-2008. NCHS data brief no 87. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2012. 2012;3(4):534–000.
  34. Afeiche MC, Koyratty BNS, Wang D, Jacquier EF, Lê KA. Intakes and sources of total and added sugars among 4 to 13-year-old children in China, Mexico and the United States. 2018;13(4):204–12.
  35. Patrick H, Nicklas TA. A Review of Family and Social Determinants of Children’s Eating Patterns and Diet Quality. 2005 Apr 1;24(2):83–92. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15798074/
  36. Bayer O, Nehring I, Bolte G, Von Kries R. Fruit and vegetable consumption and BMI change in primary school-age children: A cohort study. 2014 Feb 7;68(2):265–70. Available from: www.nature.com/ejcn
  37. Epstein LH, Gordy CC, Raynor HA, Beddome M, Kilanowski CK, Paluch R. Increasing fruit and vegetable intake and decreasing fat and sugar intake in families at risk for childhood obesity. 2001;9(3):171–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11323442/
  38. Øverby NC, Lillegaard IT, Johansson L, Andersen LF. High intake of added sugar among Norwegian children and adolescents. 2004 Apr;7(2):285–93. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15003136/
  39. Thompson FE, McNeel TS, Dowling EC, Midthune D, Morrissette M, Zeruto CA. Interrelationships of Added Sugars Intake, Socioeconomic Status, and Race/Ethnicity in Adults in the United States: National Health Interview Survey, 2005. 2009 Aug;109(8):1376–83. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19631043/
  40. Øverby NC, Lillegaard IT, Johansson L, Andersen LF. High intake of added sugar among Norwegian children and adolescents. 2004 Apr;7(2):285–93. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15003136/
  41. Avery A, Anderson C, McCullough F. Associations between children’s diet quality and watching television during meal or snack consumption: A systematic review. 2017 Oct 1;13(4). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28211230/
  42. Olafsdottir S, Berg C, Eiben G, Lanfer A, Reisch L, Ahrens W, et al. Young children’s screen activities, sweet drink consumption and anthropometry: results from a prospective European study. 2013 Nov 20;68(2):223–8. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/ejcn2013234