1. Kensler KH, Rebbeck TR. Cancer Progress and Priorities: Prostate Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020; 29(2):267-277. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0412.
2. Moe A, Hayne D. Transrectal ultrasound biopsy of the prostate: does it still have a role in prostate cancer diagnosis? Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(6):3018-3024. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.37.
3. Ahdoot M, Wilbur AR, Reese SE, et al. MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(10):917-928. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038.
4. Wagenlehner FM, Van Oostrum E, Tenke P et al. Infective complications after prostate biopsy: outcome of the Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) 2010 and 2011, a prospective multinational multicentre prostate biopsy study. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 521–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.003.
5. Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):713-719. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.059.
6. Bass EJ, Pantovic A, Connor MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy techniques compared to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Sep 21.
doi:10.1038/s41391-021-00449-7
7. Verma S, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, et al. The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer. Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):343-356.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161684.
8. Omer A, Lamb AD. Optimizing prostate biopsy techniques. Curr Opin Urol. 2019 Nov;29(6):578-586. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000678.
9. Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, et al. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1573-0.
10. Pepe P, Garufi A, Priolo G, et al. Transperineal versus transrectal MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy: detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017;15:e33-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.007.
11. Smith JB, Popert R, Nuttall MC, et al. Transperineal sector prostate biopsies: a local anesthetic outpatient technique. Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.008.
12. Kum F, Elhage O, Maliyil J, et al. Initial outcomes of local anaesthetic freehand transperineal prostate biopsies in the outpatient setting. BJU Int. 2020 Feb;125(2):244-252.
doi: 10.1111/bju.14620.
13. Setia SA, Smith J, Cendo D, et al. Outcomes of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy with omission of antibiotic prophylaxis. BJU Int. 2021 Sep 7. doi:10.1111/bju.15590
14. Chiu PK, Lo KL, Teoh JY et al. Sectoral cancer detection and tolerability of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):431-438. doi:10.1038/s41391-020-00293-1
15. Borkowetz A, Hadaschik B, Platzek I, et al. Prospective comparison of transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion biopsy and transrectal systematic biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients. BJU Int. 2018, 121, 53–60. doi:10.1111/bju.14017.
16. Neale A, Stroman L, Kum F et al. Targeted and systematic cognitive freehand-guided transperineal biopsy: is there still a role for systematic biopsy? BJU Int. 2020 Aug;126(2):280-285. doi:10.1111/bju.15092.
17. Elkhoury FF, Felker ER, Kwan L, et al. Comparison of Targeted vs Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men Who Are biopsy-naive: The Prospective Assessment of Image Registration in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PAIREDCAP) Study. JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):811-818. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1734.
18. Urology EAo. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer, 2022.
https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer
19. Skouteris VM, Crawford ED, Mouraviev V, et al. Transrectal ultrasound–guided versus transperineal mapping prostate biopsy: complication comparison. Rev Urol 2018; 20: 19. doi: 10.3909/riu0785.
20. Young R, Norris B, Reeves F, et al. A Retrospective Comparison of Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsies: Experience of a Single Surgeon. J Endourol. 2019 Jun;33(6):498-502. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0170.
21. Islam M, Da Silva RD, Quach A, et al. Are outpatient transperineal prostate biopsies without antibiotic prophylaxis equivalent to standard transrectal biopsies for patient safety and cancer detection rates?A retrospective cohort study in 222 patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2021;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13037-021-00303-8.
22. Sigle A, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Pudimat M, et al. Safety and side effects of transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis. Urol Oncol. 2021 Nov;39(11):782.e1-782.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.016.
23. Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, et al. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Local Anesthesia: Experience with 1,287 Patients. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate, Complications and Patient Tolerability. J Urol. 2019 Jun;201(6):1121-1126.
doi: 10.1097/JU.00000000000000156.