Based on mass data collected in the past decade, we systematically comb the neurology diseases of children, and divide them into 20 diseases (primary subjects) and 44 subtype diseases (secondary subjects) as shown in Fig. 1 in this paper.
Note that children with neurological diseases mainly suffer from encephalopathy and encephalitis, such as intracranial infection, central nervous system autoimmune disease, encephalopathy, cerebrovascular disease, and hereditary metabolic encephalopathy [7, 8]. In fact, these diseases are rather complex, and the medical level in this direction is still in continuous development. In the process of analyzing neurology diseases and tracing its development, we obtained some meaningful conclusions with theoretical value and gave corresponding suggestions as follow:
(1) In terms of basic characteristics: i) Among the neurological diseases in children, paroxysmal disease is the most common, such as epilepsy and febrile convulsion, and then intracranial infection followed. Apparently, many diseases also have higher incidences, with almost more than 100 cases per year, such as migraine/vascular neuromodulation disorder, facial paralysis, developmental disorder (neuropsychiatric), and neuromuscular junction disease in children. (ii) The average onset age of benign intracranial hypertension is the lowest, which is consistent with its characteristics, with the imperfect blood brain barrier in infants. Noted that the average age of convulsion (others) is close to that of febrile convulsion, suggesting that the two may have similar pathogenesis and epidemiological characteristics. Furthermore, in terms of mean onset age, the situation of intracranial infection of unknown cause is closer to viral intracranial infection rather than bacterial intracranial infection, indicating that a higher proportion of these cases is due to viral intracranial infection. Similarly, the factor, easily misdiagnosed mitochondrial encephalopathy as viral intracranial infection in the past, is also caused by their similar onset ages. Meanwhile, the onset age of central nervous system autoimmune disease is slightly higher than viral intracranial infection’s, suggesting that children beyond school age are more likely to develop secondary autoimmune disease. iii) The ratio of males in most neurology diseases is higher, which influenced by the fact that males outnumber females in the population. Nevertheless, the gender ratio is reversed in most central nervous system autoimmune disease, though this condition is a common phenomenon. iv) LoS for epilepsy (variance of 24.88, much higher than for other paroxysmal disease) varies greatly, which is mainly due to the great heterogeneity. For example, benign epilepsy in children with spike in the central temporal region, as a relatively simple condition, does not require difficult treatment, resulting in relatively low cost. Various epileptic encephalopathies, however, with complex etiology and frequent recurrence, their treatments are hard, which also lead to long hospitalization and high cost. v) Similarly, viral intracranial infection also exists such condition. Mild viral intracranial infection can be self-limited and can be cured without special treatment, but severe viral intracranial infection is disparate, since it may be seriously life-threatening and even secondary to autoimmune encephalitis. The acute critical period involves special means such as gamma-globulin, high dose hormone, plasma exchange and ventilator treatment. Therefore, the hospitalization time and cost of severe viral intracranial infection are also high. It is plausible that severe viral intracranial infection is mostly on the basis of virus infection, secondary immune storm, leading to the aggravation of the condition. However, limited to the current understanding and diagnosis and treatment level, these patients may not find the corresponding diagnostic markers. In this regard, the update of diagnostic methods will help to further confirm the accurate diagnosis of patients at an early stage, make more targeted treatment in time and improve the prognosis [9]. vi) Central nervous immune system disease tends to has longer hospitalization time and higher cost. It cannot be separated the severity of most immune diseases and the use of special treatments such as gamma globulin and plasma exchange in the acute stage; vii) There was no significant difference in LoS and ADHE between the two subtype diseases of hereditary metabolic encephalopathy, even the LoS differs only 0.1 days, which is related to the lack of effective treatment for most genetic diseases. viii) Based on the above results, the weak concentration of onset age of viral intracranial infection not only suggests that it can occur at all ages, but also that some other diseases may be misdiagnosed as it or intracranial infection of unknown etiology. In addition, the age of bacterial intracranial infection is relatively concentrated, reflecting that most clinical patients of this disease are small infants, and a few older children suffer from it mostly related to the factors such as immune deficiency and local structural abnormalities.
(2) It can be seen from the seasonal characteristics that there are great differences in high incidence seasons among different diseases. On the one hand, central nervous system infectious disease is mostly concentrated in the high temperature season, especially in summer, which are related to the growth and spread of viruses and bacteria in a high temperature environment. On the other hand, neuroimmune disease is more common in winter and spring, which is related to the reduction of autoimmune barrier function of the human body in cold conditions. Hence, the following measures effectively improve this situation. For instance, we should effectively strengthen the immune capacity of the body, pay attention to keeping children warm and release policies on central heating in a humid and cold environment in the southern part of China. Of course, in the future, more in-depth studies should be conducted on multi-center, multi-latitude patients for long-term monitoring.
(3) In terms of disease development, the number of hospitalized patients with intracranial infection and encephalopathy has decreased significantly in recent years, while that with most central nervous system autoimmune disease and hereditary metabolic encephalopathy maintains the trend of continuous growth year by year [10]. It is necessary to further explain this phenomenon. i) With the improvement of hygienic conditions, water quality and public health awareness, the number of patients with intracranial infection dwindles constantly. ii) The research on neurological diseases in China started late. In the past, we often misdiagnosed immune encephalitis and hereditary metabolic encephalopathy as viral intracranial infection and atypical bacterial intracranial infection. Nevertheless, medical diagnosis has improved and related diseases have become more detailed in recent years. To be specific, the detection of neuroimmune antibodies has been gradually carried out since 2015 [11] and we have been gradually popularized metabolic screening and genetic testing technology in recent 10 years [12], which lead to the increase number patients correctly diagnosed as central nervous system autoimmune disease and hereditary metabolic encephalopathy respectively. Meanwhile, these measures have effectively reduced the misclassification rate of the disease. They can be one of the reasons for the decrease in the number of patients with viral and bacterial intracranial infection. iii) At the same time, there is a significant decrease in the number of intracranial infection during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially the sudden decline of bacterial intracranial infection. The epidemic has brought a lot of inconvenience to patients' medical treatment, and the isolation at home is related to cutting off the transmission route of bacteria and virus. iv) The ANoP of central demyelinating disease dropped sharply in 2020. This also indicated that more and more patients, diagnosed as central demyelinating disease before, are now finely diagnosed as MOG antibody-associated disorder or anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Obviously, the improvement of diagnostic accuracy is conducive to the refinement of patient treatment plan and long-term management. Furthermore, in recent years, with the improvement of detection technology, medical workers have been discovered and reported new antibodies related to immune encephalitis on and on [13].
(4) Last but not least, for some diseases with only one central distribution trend, they basically have precise treatment plan, and the specific treatment after diagnosis can increase the prognostic value. However, the distributions of some disease characteristics are multicentric, and there is no corresponding precise treatment scheme. So these diseases are usually serious, with long time of admission and high cost. For example, many diseases in viral encephalitis with kinds of etiologies are unclear, and a certain proportion of them are unknown. Therefore, it is expected to improve this dilemma by further technological development.
And some central nervous system autoimmune disease characteristics show non-unimodal phenomenon, indicating that our understanding of these diseases is still limited. Though there have been dozens of immune encephalitis antibodies and the adjustment of clinical diagnosis and treatment plan has been updated accordingly over the past 20 years, many other antibody-specific encephalitis are highly likely to be discovered and diagnosed in the future. It is noted that the disease density distribution chart can give doctors a certain reminder in the refinement of the disease. Especially when the distribution of disease features is polycentric, we need to pay attention to whether the disease can be further classified. It is of great significance for the disease understanding, the adjustment of treatment plan and the improvement of prognosis.