3.1 Scanning Electron Microscopy & Electron Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy
Table 1 shows presence of bismuth element in PA6.6-based composite fi- bers doped with different amount of Bi2O3. Results showed that amount of Bi2O3 in electrospun webs increased as increasing powder concentration in polymer solutions. Besides, Bi2O3 powder was adapted into nanofiber struc- tures by considering SEM analysis of PA6.6/ Bi2O3 nanocomposite fibers.
Table 1. Elemental constituents of samples (wt %)
|
PA6.6/0
|
PA6.6/5
|
PA6.6/10
|
C
|
73.38
|
62.36
|
54.15
|
N
|
14.29
|
17.69
|
15.79
|
O
|
12.32
|
14.16
|
14.61
|
Bi
|
-
|
5.79
|
15.44
|
SEM micrographs of Bi2O3 powder showed that Bi2O3 was layerless material having irregular spherical shapes with uncertain surface uniformity. Particle sizes of Bi2O3 powder changed from 650.4 nm to 1.724 µm and average particle size was found as 1.246 µm. According to SEM images of PA6.6-based webs, nanocomposite fibers were manufactured with/without microparticles. Average fiber diameter of neat PA6.6 nanofibers (PA6.6-0) was 68.25 ± 20 nm. PA6.6/ Bi2O3 nanocomposite fibers with average diameter of 81.5 ± 10 nm and 84.10 ± 12 nm were obtained for PA6.6-5 and PA6.6-10, respectively. Despite of gradual increase in Bi2O3 loading, there is no meaningful or direct relationship between fiber diameter and Bi2O3 weight percentage. Due to continuous and partially beaded nanofiber manufacturing, it was concluded that FA/DCM binary solvent mixture did not satisfactorily contribute to homogeneity of PA6.6 polymer solution containing Bi2O3 but studying on suitable concentration range with these solvents supported nanofiber occurrence [53,54].
Figure 1 shows the SEM images of Bi2O3 powder and PA6.6/ Bi2O3 nano-composite webs.
3.2 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
FT-IR spectra of electrospun webs were examined by considering EDX test results to detect possible bond formation in nanocomposite fibers. In Figure 2, bands at 3296.655 cm−1, 2919.519 cm−1 and 1634.330 cm−1 wavelengths represented stretching vibrations of N-H, CH2 and C=O bonds, respectively. Besides, N-H bending vibration was shown at wavelength of 1634.330 cm−1. Characteristic peaks of PA6.6 nanofibers were consistent with previous studies [55]. Peak intensity of PA6.6/Bi2O3 nanocomposite fibers increased without any shift in characteristic band ranges and these increases were results of an increase in Bi2O3 concentration.
3.3 Differential Scanning Calorimetry & Thermogravimetric Analysis
In Figure 3, DSC results showed that PA6.6/Bi2O3 electrospun webs had similar pattern with little shifts due to increase in Bi2O3 loading. Glass transition temperature (Tg) values of Bi2O3-free PA6.6 sample was consistent with webs electrospun with polymer concentration of 10 % (w) in previous studies and it was reported as 56.44 0C [56-58]. Bi2O3 loaded nanofibers showed higher Tg values with comparison of unloaded ones. DSC thermograms of Bi2O3-free electrospun fiber were relevant with literature but these peaks were shifted and observed at higher temperature values for electrospun fibers containing Bi2O3 micro particles. Electrospinning was performed at room temperature and further process was not applied to surfaces, such as drying in an oven for a while. Therefore, no crystallization would occur during electrospinning. Besides, randomly aligned electrospun fibers were manufactured and perfect alignment of nanofibers were not observed which was a factor triggering crystallization [58]. Tm and Tg values of samples are given in Table 2.
To investigate the effects of Bi2O3 on the thermal stability of nanocomposite web, TGA analysis was performed and weight loss due to thermal degradation was determined. For neat PA6.6 (PA6.6-0), small weight loss was observable above 200 0C due to evaluation of traces of moisture or unreacted monomers and decomposition was available above 350 0C due to decomposition of base polymer to leave residual carbon from polymer backbone [59]. For PA6.6/Bi2O3 nano-composites, onset decomposition temperature increased with corresponding to neat PA6.6 by 5 % and 10 % Bi2O3 loading. Weight loss of loaded samples were seen above 450 0C. This case explained that Bi2O3 doping developed thermal behaviors of samples. % weight loss of samples are given in Figure 4.
3.4 Thickness of Samples
By the help of a digital fabric thickness measurement device, the thickness measurements were taken from five different points of electrospun mats. PA6.6-0 and PA6.6-10 mats were measured as 0.066 mm and 0.108 mm, respectively. In terms of fiber diameter, fineness of PA6.6-based nanofibers was measured between the values of 68.25 nm and 84.10 nm. By taking average fiber diameter into consideration, there was a consistent relationship between Bi2O3 loading and fabric thickness as well as fiber diameter. Bi2O3 loading caused to increase in fiber dia and thereby web thickness of PA6.6-10 was found as higher than that of others. Relationship between thickness and aver-age fiber diameter of mats are illustrated in Figure 5. The average thickness of PES spunbond was also determined by taking five measurements from different points of sample and recorded as 0.192 mm.
3.5 Electrical Characteristics
The electrical resistivity of coated PES spunbonds are illustrated in Figure 6 as a function of fiber diameter. The resistivity of uncoated PES spunbond was measured as 170.535 kΩcm. Coating PES spunbond with undoped PA6.6 nano-fibers (PA6.6-0) increased electrical resistivity with three-and-a-half times and the value was measured as 592.287 kΩcm. Besides, 5 wt% Bi2O3 loading contributed electrical resistance and electrical resistivity of PA6.6-5 coated PES was 5 times higher than that of uncoated PES. The values were determined as 855.917 kΩcm to 949.398 kΩcm for PA6.6-5 and PA6.6-10 coated samples, respectively. Coated PES spunbonds showed more insulating property than uncoated ones. This can be correlated with tortuosity effect of nanofibers collected on PES spunbond and slow discharge of electrical energy in nanofiber layers. It is reported that increase in electrical resistivity was related with polymer type and nanofiber production utilized both Bi2O3 propagation and decisive characteristics’ exhibition in composite structures [60-62]. The resistivity of samples increased with the fiber diameter. Increase in Bi2O3 loading caused thicker fiber manufacturing and this lead to decrease in contact probability of electrospun fibers due tolarge fiber diameter. On the other hand, insulating character of polymer matrix triggered the decrease in resistivity. As a consequence, these two effects contribute to an increase in electrical resistivity as fiber diameter increases [63,64].
Figure 7 shows the electrical conductivity values of samples with different thickness. The thickness of uncoated PES was 0.192 mm whereas PA6.6-10 coated was 0.300 mm. Increase in fiber diameter lead to thicker coating and thereby PES spunbond coated with PA6.6-10 mat with average fiber diameter of 84.10 nm was found as one-and-half higher than uncoated one. Due to insulating character of both polymer matrix (PA6.6 polymer) and filler (Bi2O3) and less contact among nanofibers, a remarkable increase was observed in electrical resistivity. But negligible decrease was also available in electrical conductivity. Coating of PES spunbond with doped or undoped PA6.6 nanofibers caused to a slight decrease in electrical conductivity. The obtained values were 5,864 E-06 S/cm for uncoated PES, 1,688E-06 S/cm for PA6.6-0 and 1,168E-06 S/cm for PA6.6-5 coated PES. PA6.6-0 coating decreased conductivity at a ratio of 71.22 % whereas PA6.6-5 coating of 80.09 %. This case can be explained by absence of perfect contact among electrospun fibers, presence of less fill factor and lack of accurate thickness measurement for electrospun webs. The electrical conductivity of coated samples were slightly higher than that of each other due to high porosity. Besides, in four point probe method, conductivity measurement is based on totalvolume by disregarding spaces among fibers [64,65]. It is expected to obtain considerable decrease in electrical conductivity of an individual electrospun nanofiber.