Control of Monomeric Vo’s vs. Vo clusters in ZrO2-x for Solar-Light H2 Production from H2O at High-Yield [millimoles gr-1 h-1]

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1738703/v1

Download PDF

Article

Control of Monomeric Vo’s vs. Vo clusters in ZrO_2-xforSolar-Light H₂ Production from H₂O at High-Yield [millimoles gr^-1 h^-1]

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1738703/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Pristine zirconia, ZrO₂, possesses high premise as photocatalyst due to its conduction band energy edge. However, its high energy-gap is prohibitive for photoactivation by solar-light. Currently, it is unclear how solar-active zirconia can be designed to meet the requirements for high photocatalytic performance. Moreover, transferring this design to an industrial-scale process is a forward-looking route. Herein, we have developed a novel Flame Spray Pyrolysis (FSP) process for generating solar-light active nano-ZrO_2-x via engineering of lattice vacancies, Vo. Using solar photons, our optimal nano-ZrO_2-x can achieve milestone H₂-production yield, >2400 μmolg^-1h^-1 (closest thus, so far, to high photocatalytic water splitting performance benchmarks). Visible light can be also exploited by nano-ZrO_2-x at a high yield via a two-photon process. Control of monomeric Vo vs. clusters of Vo’s is the key parameter toward Highly-Performing-Photocatalytic ZrO_2-x. Thus, the reusable and sustainable ZrO_2-x catalyst achieves so far unattainable solar activated photocatalysis, under large scale production.

Sunlight energy storage to H₂ via photocatalytic water splitting^1,2 bears key advantages, such as high energy-storage capacity of H₂ 141.6 kJ g^− 1 vs. 0.46–0.72 kJ g^− 1 on Li-batteries³. Water photocatalysis to produce H₂ is an inherently green-technology, fully compliant with circular economy⁴. Moreover, maximization of photocatalytic efficiency in tandem with minimized costs for industrial-scale production is mandatory. So far, most literature reports on high-performance photocatalysts (HPP) refer to nanomaterials with focus on performance optimization⁵. Except TiO₂, industrial-scale and cost-effective production of HPP’s remains at its infancy.

Metal oxides can be HPP’s as long as they fulfill certain key criteria: H₂ production and CO₂ reduction, are favored by high conduction band (CB) semiconductors. Pristine zirconia (ZrO₂) has one of the highest CB-edge energies among metal oxides E_CB=-1100 mV vs. NHE. However, its band-gap energy E_g>5eV requires highly energetic photons, i.e., λ < 225 nm, which is prohibitive for solar-light harvesting. In this context, pristine ZrO₂ despite its established uses in technology, e.g. as refracting coating⁶, thermal coating⁷, gas-sensing⁸, fuel cells⁹, Water-Gas-Shift reaction¹⁰, so far, has not been established as a high-performance photocatalyst. Historically, Sayama and Arakawa¹¹ were the first to observe photocatalytic performance of pristine ZrO₂ reporting a rather symbolic H₂-production yield 72 µmol g^− 1 h^− 1 under X-ray irradiation.

Strategies to ameliorate photocatalytic ZrO₂ activity, can include: i) add-atom insertion^12–17 into ZrO₂ crystal, or ii) defects’ creation^18–23. The influence of add-atoms in ZrO₂ has been investigated^12–17, in photocatalytic dye degradation or O₂ evolution. Cerium-doped ZrO₂ (Ce-ZrO₂) can be photoactive in visible λ > 420nm light¹². Erbium-doped ZrO₂¹⁴ allowed band-gap tuning towards solar photons, which contributed to improved Methylene-Blue degradation¹³. Nitrogen¹⁵ and carbon¹⁷ 2p-orbitals can enhance photocatalytic dye degradation via generation of intra-bandgap states. However, in all aforementioned cases, the reported photocatalytic performances, despite improvement, remain by far inferior vs. benchmark photocatalysts, such as TiO₂ which routinely achieves H₂ photoproduction of the order of several [millimoles H₂ g^− 1h^− 1] in typical lab set ups²⁴. So far, the only ZrO₂-based photocatalyst passing the threshold of [millimoles g^− 1h^− 1] is 2.1 mmol H₂ g^− 1 h^− 1 by a N-doped ZrO₂²⁵ .

Without heteroatom doping, generation of reduced states in reducible metal-oxides, such as TiO₂, are decisively beneficial for H₂ photo yield. Examples include the work of Mao et al²³, Naldoni et al²⁶ and our Flame Spray Pyrolysis (FSP)-made black TiO_2 − x²⁷. ZrO₂ is a notoriously non-reducible oxide^28,29, since introduction of Vo’s into the ZrO₂ lattice is not favored energetically^8,15−20, thus specific synthesis methods are needed to achieve reduction of the ZrO₂ lattice. To this direction, the most significant performance has been reported by Sinhamahapatra et al²² and Zu et al³⁰, where defect-rich ZrO_2 − x has achieved production of ~ 0.5 mmolg^− 1h^− 1 H₂ in both cases, however, this is still significantly below that of TiO₂^26,31.

Regarding material synthesis, none of the so far reported ZrO_2 − x synthesis methods were designed to be scalable at industrial level. Specifically, previous ZrO_2 − x synthesis methods include sol-gel¹⁹, hydrothermal²⁰, high pressure/temperature processing^18,21. More efficient methods able to overcome the non-reducibility of ZrO₂ are magnesiothermic²², titaniothermic²³ and lithiothermic reduction³⁰ where an elementary hetrometal M⁰ atom, i.e. Li⁰, Ti⁰, Mg⁰, is used to reduce ZrO₂ and create the desired Vo at high yield. However, all aforementioned synthesis routes include multiple steps and do not always allow facile/reproducible control or tailoring of Vo placement and populations. Particularly, the methods which require heterometal contact on ZrO₂ surface e.g. magnesiothermic, rely on harsh acid washes for removing the leftover hetero-metal oxide, something that mounts questions on how this may impact the state of the catalyst itself²².

Herein we have developed an one-step Flame Spray Pyrolysis (FSP) process for synthesis of solar-light active nano-ZrO_2 − x via engineering of lattice-vacancies, Vo. FSP is eminently suited for synthesis of high crystallinity nano-ZrO₂^32,33, however, the synthesis of ZrO_2 − x has not been reported by FSP. In principle ZrO₂ can possess two families of reduced states: [i] reduced Zr³⁺ centers, and [ii] oxygen vacancies not-located on Zr atoms (Vo’s). Over last decades, Giamello’s group³⁴ has provided valuable insights into the complexity of these reduced states. Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, in combination with quantum chemical calculations^34, they prove that Zr³⁺ centers can create extra energy states right below the E_CB of pristine ZrO₂, (~ 4.5-5.0 eV). Based on all existing evidence, these Zr³⁺ centers are expected to have little effect on the photocatalytic activity of zirconia³⁵. On the other hand, Vo’s can create mid-gap states³⁴ but their role in photocatalytic H₂ evolution has not been explored systematically. Herein, using FSP we have produced libraries of ZrO_2 − x nano catalysts with varying concentrations of Vo’s and identified the optimal configuration, towards high photocatalytic H₂-production efficiency from H₂O. Specific aims of the present work were: [i] to develop a novel industrial-scale FSP method for one-step synthesis of nanosized ZrO_2 − x with controllable population and placement of the O-vacancies (Vo’s). No add-atoms were used, [ii] to optimize the ZrO_2 − x for highly efficient solar light H₂ production, well beyond the current state of the art, i.e., well-above the threshold mmol g^− 1 h^− 1, [iii] to provide a comprehensive understanding of the physicochemical role of Vo, with emphasis on monomeric vs. clusters of Vo’s related to the photocatalytic properties. We present a novel anoxic-FSP process that allows in-situ formation of Vo’s during the primary particle formation step. Using solar photons, the optimal nano-ZrO_2 − x can achieve milestone H₂-production yield, > 2400 µmolg^− 1h^− 1 which is the closest so far to high photocatalytic performance benchmarks. We demonstrate that optimal nano-ZrO_2 − x can be achieved by controlling the monomeric Vo vs. clusters of Vo’s by two routes either during the FSP synthesis or via a short post-FSP oxidation process.

Synthesis of Nano ZrO _2 − x by Anoxic-Flame Spray Pyrolysis. The concept of the novel anoxic-FSP process is outlined in Fig. 1. It consists of a single-nozzle FSP reactor with enclosed flame, where a mixture of Dispersion-gas [O₂ and CH₄] is used to create a reducing reaction atmosphere. In FSP-process³⁵, ZrO₂ particles are formed in three stages (Fig. 1). First, Zr-precursor droplets are sprayed by the FSP nozzle and combusted to generate the primary particles (PP)³⁵. Then, primary particles evolve in the high-temperature area of the flame, i.e. up to 2800 K and form nanometric ZrO₂ particles via sintering of PP’s³⁵. In classical-FSP, used in the majority of lab studies and industry, pure O₂ is used as dispersion gas through the spray nozzle, to form the droplets and primary particles. For example, by adjusting the combustion stoichiometry³⁵ ratio P/D =[fuel/dispersion O₂] = 3/3, we obtain fully oxidized, pristine ZrO₂. In our anoxic-FSP, combustion of CH₄ in the dispersion gas creates reducing agents which, as we show herein, can reduce the primary Zr-particle via formation of Oxygen vacancies (Vo). We also have considered the possibility of the formation of Zr-Hydride states³⁶, however, none of our data support this, thus we do not discuss it further.

In this way, we have produced a library of ZrO_2-x nanoparticles of varying Vo concentrations, see photos in Fig. 2. Herein we have codenamed the particles according to the dispersion [O₂/CH₄] ratio used, (see full details in Table S1 in SI). For example, the material codenamed [3/0.1] has been synthesized using a dispersion gas-mixture of [O₂ flow = 3.0 lt min^-1 and CH₄ flow = 0.1 lt min^-1]. Pristine ZrO₂ is codenamed F.O. for Fully Oxidized, while material [1.3/1.7] was the most reduced. As shown in Fig. 2, going from pristine ZrO₂ (F.O.) towards more reduced particles, i.e. [3/0.1] to [1.3/1.7], induced a change of particle color from crispy-white to pale grey/yellowish [3/0.1] and dark-gray for [1.3/1.7] material. XPS data (Fig. 2d) shows a progressive increase of Vo’s, detected by their characteristic signal at 532 eV^37,38. We have verified that no-carbon deposition is evidenced by Raman data, (Supplementary Fig. S3), thus the observed color changes in the ZrO_2-x materials (Fig. 2), are assigned exclusively to the formation of Vo’s via the anoxic-FSP process. According to XPS, Fig. 2d increased dispersion of the CH₄ in the FSP process, promotes the formation of Vo’s. No Zr³⁺ states are resolved in Zr-XPS data, i.e., only the Zr⁴⁺ doublet was detected (181.9 eV, 184.2 eV) (Supplementary Fig. S4(a-d)).

The DRS-UV/Vis data, (Fig. 2c) show a progressive alteration of the band gaps as evidenced by the absorbance at intra-gap energies of 2.5 to 4.5 eV. All materials exhibit the primary bandgap 5.1 eV (243 nm) typical for monoclinic-ZrO₂^18,20. Fully oxidized ZrO₂ exhibited only the primary bandgap at 5.1 eV with no mid-gap states. Slightly-reduced [3/0.1] exhibited an additional absorbance tail band extending to ~ 3.1 eV. Low concentration of Vo’s, created by 0.1 Lmin^− 1 CH₄, (see XPS data Fig. 2d) [3/0.1], allows absorbance of photons near the middle of the primary bandgap, and creates a pale-yellow color, see photo Fig. 2. Increasing dispersion CH₄ (materials [3/0.2], [2.3/0.7], [1.3/1.7]) causes a monotonous enhancement of the intra-band absorbances and grey-color intensification (Fig. 2c). Experimentally^{18,20,22,23,30} and theoretically^29,34 the intra-band absorbances in the range of 2.8–3.5 eV, can be assigned to electrons being injected from the VB_maximum to approximately the middle of the gap, where extra DOS are made available through the introduction of Vo’s. For example, by removing one oxygen atom, a doubly occupied (diamagnetic) F-center³⁹ can be created inside the bandgap ZrO_2 − x at 3.3 eV³⁹.

Structural Characterization. XRD (Fig. 2a) shows that our FSP-made Zr-particles consisted of monoclinic (m-ZrO₂ in Fig. 2a) and tetragonal (t-ZrO₂ in Fig. 2a) phases, at a ratio [t-ZrO₂]: [m-ZrO₂] = 4:1 and particle sizes 22–29 nm (monoclinic) to 16–20 nm (tetragonal phase) (Table S2). At ambient P, T, ZrO₂ has monoclinic (m) structure with Zr⁴⁺ atoms 7-fold coordinated by O-anions (space group P2₁/c). TEM images, (Fig. 2b, 3), show that all ZrO_2 − X nanomaterials have quasi-spherical shapes, with highly crystalline Miller planes t-{101}. The more reduced ZrO_2 − X nanomaterials show some degree of surface distortion, see Fig. 2b. STEM images (Fig. 3a,b,c) indicate that the particles retain a high degree of crystal quality even at the more reduced ones. In some cases, formation of vacancies could be evidenced in the STEM images, (Fig. 3c). EDX data (Fig. 3) confirm a strong decrease of the Oxygen/Zr ratio in the more reduced [2.7/0.3] and [1.3./1.7] materials. BET analysis (Table S2) shows progressive SSA-decrease upon increase dispersion-CH₄. attributed to increased aggregation of the particles at increased CH_4, i.e. methane creates hotter flames i.e. methane heat of combustion = 50–55 MJ/kg (https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/).

Raman spectra (Fig. 4b) exhibit the vibrational modes from both monoclinic and tetragonal crystal phases^40–43 (Fig. S2 and Table S3) and absence of carbon peaks (Fig. S3). In ZrO_2 − x materials, certain Raman modes are shifted (see Fig. 4b(I-III) and Table S4). More particularly, material [3/0.1] exhibits downshifts of 3 cm^− 1, 6 cm^− 1 and 9 cm^− 1 at 264 cm^− 1, 320 cm^− 1 and 641 cm^− 1 modes respectively (Table S4). Material [2.3/0.7] exhibits downshifts of 5 cm^− 1, 6cm^− 1 at 320 cm^− 1, and 641cm^− 1 respectively (Table S4). Material [1.3/1.7] exhibits downshift of up to 10cm^− 1. Such downshifts can be attributed to tensile stress⁴⁴ effectively lengthening the bonds, see Fig. 4a, i.e. due to loss of oxygen atoms from the lattice. Raman downshifts prevail in the t-ZrO₂ phase; thus, the tetragonal phase is more responsive in the reductive atmosphere in anoxic-FSP. This can be explained by the existence of two different/non-equivalent Zr-O bond conformations in t-ZrO₂⁴⁴ corresponding to 4-coordinated Zr(O_4f), and 3-coordinated Zr atoms (O_3f) respectively⁴⁴. For comparison, the t-ZrO₂ matrix consists solely of O_4f Zr atoms while the m-ZrO₂ matrix consists of both O_4f and O_3f⁴⁴. Accordingly, the present Raman data indicate that removal of oxygen from the ZrO₂ matrices is also non-equivalent, thus is easier to extract oxygen from an O_4f site rather than an O_3f site by 0.1 eV²², therefore it is easier to reduce t-ZrO₂.

Photocatalytic H ₂ Production at [millimole gr^− 1 h^− 1]: Fig. 5a presents the photocatalytic H₂ production from H₂O, for all our ZrO_2 − x materials, under Xenon-illumination. In each panel in Fig. 5a the as-prepared photocatalysts are marked as “a.p”. The time indication in each bar, refers to the post-FSP oxidation-time at 400⁰C (see also XRD data in Fig. S1 in S.I.). First, we discuss the as-prepared ZrO_2 − x materials i.e., see the first bar in each column group in Fig. 5a. Pristine, (F.O.) ZrO₂ was practically non-photoactive in H₂ production, with a yield of 20 µmol g^− 1 h^− 1.

In contrast, a slightly reducing FSP atmosphere, i.e., as-prepared [a.p. 3/0.1], enables an impressive amelioration of H₂ evolution of 1700 µmol g^− 1 h^− 1. This demonstrates that anoxic-FSP can provide as-prepared ZrO_2 − x material exhibiting millimoles per gram per hour H₂ production. Further increase of O₂/ CH₄ ratio impacted negatively the H₂ photogeneration with a tendency towards a steady production near 500 µmol g^− 1 h^− 1 of H₂ for the highly reduced as-prepared materials (see the first bar in each group in Fig. 5a). Soft oxidation by calcination at 400 ⁰C under ambient O₂, exerted a dramatic influence on the H₂-photoproduction: a characteristic bell-shaped dependence was observed for the [3.0/0.2] and [2.3/0.7] materials. The optimum oxidation time was 90min for [2.3/0.7] ZrO_2 − x which, achieved a remarkable yield of 2428 µmol H₂ g^− 1 h^− 1. The best performance of the [3.0/0.2] ZrO_2 − x material was 1500 µmol H₂ g^− 1 h^− 1 (Fig. 5a).

The catalyst with the higher H₂ yield, [2.3/0.7]-90, is highly recyclable, (Fig. S8a), retaining 100% of its activity after two reuses and > 96% after four reuses. XRD (Fig. S8b), shows that the [2.3/0.7]-90 crystal remains intact after 4-uses. Concurrently, DRS-UV/Vis (Fig. S8c), demonstrates that its light-absorbance profile remains also intact. As we discuss hereafter, optimization of monomeric Vo-concentration is determinant for photocatalytic activity. In [2.3/0.7]-90, the monomeric Vo’s is optimized, see EPR and XPS data in Fig. 5d,e, and Fig. S5a,b see also the trends in XPS, EPR for [2.3/0.7] in Fig. 5d,e. After photocatalytic use of [2.3/0.7]-90 material, the monomeric vacancies are not altered, neither the ZrO_2 − x crystal. Thus, the ZrO_2 − x provide a robust reusable photocatalyst.

The data in Fig. 5a demonstrate that there are two options to achieve high-photocatalytic performance ZrO_2 − x materials: either [i] to be prepared at low O₂/CH₄ ratio e.g. [3.0/0.1], or [ii] after a soft post-FSP oxidation of more reduced materials e.g. [2.7/0.3]. Very-high O₂/CH₄ ratio [1.3/1.7] results in highly-reduced ZrO_2 − x which cannot be improved by post-FSP oxidation.

The origins of these trends can be understood by considering the types and populations of the Vo’s in ZrO_2 − x. Figure 5b, d, e indicate a correlation of the H₂ production rates for the [2.7/0.3] ZrO_2 − x catalysts, with the Vo’s detected by XPS, Fig. 5d, and EPR Fig. 5e. The XPS and EPR data show a clear decrease in the population of Vo’s of the [2/7/0.3] material upon oxidation at 400⁰C. Importantly, theoretical simulation of the EPR signals, Fig. 6, allows distinction between Vo-clusters vs. monomeric Vo’s. For example, in [a.p. 2.7/0.3] Vo clusters are prevailed, while in [3.0/0.1] monomeric Vo’s prevail as we can see from percentages in Fig. 6c. Oxidation progressively eliminates Vo clusters towards monomeric Vo’s. This is also evident from the progressive elimination of the deep-grey color, and the changes in the UV-Vis spectra (Fig. S6 in SI). Taking this information into account, the bell-shaped H₂ production trend in Fig. 5b, indicates that a high concentration of O-vacancies, forming Vo clusters, is detrimental to the photocatalytic activity of ZrO_2 − x. Fewer Vo’s are better suited for optimal photocatalytic activity (see trend in Fig. 5a, for [2.7/0.3]). However, further oxidation of Vo’s tends to delimit the photoactivity. This teaches us that a quantitative control of the Vo’s clusters vs. monomeric Vo is necessary, to achieve highly-performance photocatalytic ZrO_2 − x. We consider that this factor was also of pertinence in the magnesiothermically reduced ZrO_2 − x materials ³⁴. Although not noticed by these authors³⁴, inspection of their EPR spectra, shows that these correspond to Vo clusters, which concurs with their limited H₂ production of 506 µmol H₂ g^− 1 h^− 1, resembling our as-prepared [2.7/0.3] material.

The data under visible 405 nm LED irradiation (Fig. 5c), indicate that significant part of photocatalytic H₂ production, at least 70% vs. the solar-light photons, can be excited by visible 405 nm photons (3.1 eV). Taking into account the DRS-UV/Vis data, (Fig. 2c) this can be attributed to the occurrence of the mid-gap states, (Fig. 5f). Theoretical DFT calculations (Fig. S9) show that in ZrO_2 − x, few oxygen vacancies can create mid-gap states, located at energy distances around 3.0 eV^12,45 from both the VB-top and ~ 2.0 eV from the CB-bottom. Thus, in ZrO_2 − x the 3.1 eV photons (405 nm LED) are able to excite two consecutive electron transitions, (Fig. 5f). Increased anoxicity, i.e., as in material [2.3/0.7], enhances the DOS band-tailing (see S.I. Fig. S9 and Fig. 5f). This would increase the probability of two-photon electron photoexcitation via VB◊Vo, and Vo◊CB. These electrons are favorably transferred to the Pt particles, which act as electron collectors i.e. work function of Pt, φ=+0.9eV vs NHE⁴⁶, is favorable for acceptance of electrons from the highly-excited electrons in the CB.

Quantitate analysis of V_O-Clusters vs. monomeric Vo’s, by EPR and XPS

Numerical EPR simulations, dashed lines Fig. 6a, show that monomeric Vo’s were characterized by an inhomogeneous line-shape with linewidth and a rhombic g_monomer-tensor, (Table S5). Vo clusters are characterized by a Lorenz line-shape and and isotropic g_cluster-tensor, (Table S5).

The structural significance of this is: for isotropic EPR signals with low g-anisotropy, a Gaussian line-shape is the fingerprint of the so-called inhomogeneously-broadened S = 1/2 states^47,48 which is indicative of isolated Vo’s, with no-interactions^47,48. Physically, this indicates that in the ZrO_2 − x particles produced under low CH₄-flow e.g. [3/0.1], monomeric isolated Vo^EPR centers are produced. The Lorentz line-shape of the Vo clusters indicates that it originates from Vo centers with spin-exchange and/or fast dipolar interactions. In ZrO_2 − x physically this indicates formation of Vo-clusters upon increasing dispersion-CH₄.

Comparing the XPS data for surface-Vo’s (Fig. 6d) vs. the quantitative data for total-paramagnetic Vo’s, (Fig. 6c and Table S6 in SI), derived from the EPR spectra (Fig. 6b) and their deconvolution in monometer/clusters (see example for [1.3/1.7] in Fig. S7 in SI), we notice a correlation: highly reduced ZrO_2-x, have higher surface-Vo’s, and total paramagnetic Vo’s. Figure 6e provides an overview plot, which shows that optimization of H₂ photocatalysis can be achieved via optimization of V_O-Clusters vs. monomeric Vo’s by two routes: [i] control of FSP anoxicity, or [ii] by soft post-FSP oxidation. This demonstrates that our novel anoxic-FSP process allows facile synthesis of solar-light active nano-ZrO_2-x via engineering of lattice-vacancies, Vo. Control of monomeric Vo vs. clusters of Vo’s is the key-parameter toward Highly-Performing-Photocatalytic ZrO_2-x. The anoxic-FSP process presented here should be easily adaptable to existing industrial-scale FSP reactors. This offers an efficient technology that can be adopted in the future and provide new tools for the design of other families of photoactive nanomaterials via control of oxygen vacancies.

Synthesis of Nanomaterials by FSP. Precursor solution was prepared by dissolving Zirconium (IV) Propoxide (70 wt. % in 1-propanol) in xylene and acetonitrile in a 2.2/1.0 ratio at a concentration of 0.25 M. Then, the solution was fed through a capillary at 3 ml min^-1 and dispersed to a self-sustained oxygen/methane (4 L min^-1 − 2 L min^-1) pilot flame to initiate combustion. An important distinction must be made which leads to the innovation of the presented work. ZrO_2-x materials were prepared by modifying the dispersion feed. While keeping the 3 ml min^-1 dispersion constant, methane gas (CH₄) was fed along with the traditional dispersion gas (O₂). The resulting high temperatures and hydride formation through the decomposition of methane lead to the formation of ZrO_2-x. Furthermore, the protocol of methane injection ensures the formation of bulk defects as the particle is influenced at its early stages of flight, at the primary particle stage. Finally, the pressure drop was fixed at 1.5-2.0 bar, and an additional 10 L min^-1 O₂ sheath was used to aid in particle collection which was made possible by a vacuum pump (Busch V40) and by a glass microfiber filter (GF 6 257, Hahnemühle, Dassel, Germany).

Characterization Techniques. Powder X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) data were collected at room temperature using a Bruker D8 Advance 2theta diffractometer with copper radiation (Cu Ka, λ = 1.5406 A^O) and a secondary monochromator operating at 36 kV and 36 mA. Crystal size is calculated by the Scherrer formula. X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were collected by a surface analysis ultrahigh vacuum system (SPECS GmbH) equipped with a twin Al-Mg anode X-ray source and a multichannel hemispherical sector electron analyzer (HSA Phoibos 100). The base pressure was 2 − 5 × 10^− 9 mbar. A monochromatized Mg Kα line at 1253.6 eV and analyzer pass energy of 20 eV were used in all XPS measurements. The binding energies were calculated with reference to the energy of C_1s peak of contaminant carbon at 284.5 eV. The peak deconvolution was calculated using a Shirley background.

Raman HORIBA-Xplora Plus spectrometer, equipped with an Olympus BX41 microscope. A 785 nm diode laser was used as an excitation source, and the laser beam was focused on the sample with the aid of the microscope. Before measurement, each powder material was softly pressed between two glass plates to form a pellet-like structure. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) adsorption-desorption isotherms were recorded at 77 K using a Quantachrome NOVA touch LX². Outgassing was performed at 80°C for 5h under vacuum, before the measurements. The absorption data points in the relative pressure P/P_o range of 0.1 − 0.3 was used to calculate the specific surface area (SSA).

Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. The X-band electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of ZrO₂/ZrO_2 − x materials were recorded with a Bruker ER200D spectrometer at 77 K, equipped with an Agilent 5310A frequency counter. The spectrometer was running under a custom-made software based on LabView. Adequate signal-to-noise ratio was obtained after 15–20 scans, with a microwave power fixed at 20 mW. The EPR instrumental conditions were as follows: microwave frequency = 9.53 GHz and modulation amplitude = 10 Gpp.

Theoretical Analysis of the EPR spectra. The experimental EPR spectra were simulated using the EasySpin software⁶⁴. A S = 1/2 Spin Hamiltonian was used \(\widehat{H}=\beta \overrightarrow{B}\bullet g\bullet \overrightarrow{S}\) where β is the Bohr magneton, \(\overrightarrow{B}\) is the applied magnetic field, g is the spectroscopic g-tensor and \(\overrightarrow{S}\) the spin angular momentum. The X-band electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra were recorded with a Bruker ER200D spectrometer at 77 K, equipped with an Agilent 5310A frequency counter. The spectrometer was running under a home-made software based on LabView. Adequate signal-to-noise ratio was obtained after 30–50 scans. The EPR instrumental conditions were as follows: microwave frequency = 9.55 GHz, modulation frequency = 50.00 kHz, and modulation amplitude = 10 Gauss peak-to-peak.

Photocatalytic H ₂ evolution procedure. The photocatalytic hydrogen reactions were realized into a double wall pyrex reactor, cooled with tap circulation (T = 25^Ο C). Light source was a Solar Simulator, (Sciencetech, Class AAA, model SciSun-150) with average irradiation intensity of 180 W m^− 2 equipped with a xenon lamp of 150 W and Air Mass filter (1 sun, AM1.5G). As Visible light source was used a Led lamp FireEdge™ FE410 (λ = 405 nm) supplied by Phoseon company, which power intensity was set to be 180 W m^− 2, using a power meter (Thorlabs Inc., USA). In each experiment, 50 mg of the catalyst was suspended into 150 ml water/methanol mixture 20% v/v (final concentration of the catalyst 330 mg L^− 1). Atmospheric O₂ from the suspension was removed, fulfilling the content of reactor with Ar gas (99.9997%) at least 1 h. As Pt source were used the dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate (IV) hydrate complex (H₂Pt₄Cl₆. XH₂O, 99.99%, Αlfa Αesar) which was photodeposited in situ, at the reaction mixture. Qualitative and quantitative monitoring of produced H₂ and CO₂ gases was done via a continuous online GasChromatography System combined with a Thermo-conductive Detector (GC-TCD- Shimadzu GC-2014, carboxen 1000 column, Ar carrier gas⁴⁹.

Post-FSP Oxidation. A ThermaWatt furnace was used, equipped with a tubular Quartz compartment⁵⁰. Oxidations were performed under atmospheric O₂ at temperature 400 \(℃\) and calcination time was varied from 30 min to 120 min through intervals of 30 min.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (H.F.R.I) under the “First Call for H.F.R.I Research Projects to support Faculty members and Researchers and the procurement of high-cost research equipment grant” (grant ΗFRI-1888).

Author contributions

A.M.; Particle synthesis and characterization, writing-original draft, A.Z.; Particle synthesis, Writing-original draft, M.S.; Photocatalytic experiments, Writing – review & editing, S.S. TEM analysis, Y.D.; Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/xxxxxxxxxxx.

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Yiannis Deligiannakis ([email protected]).

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Hwang, J. et al. Perovskites in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Science 358, 751–756 (2017).
Seh, Z. W. et al. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design. Science 355, 4998 (2017).
Fang, H. Challenges with the Ultimate Energy Density with Li-ion Batteries. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 781, 042023 (2021).
Villa, K., Galán-Mascarós, J. R., López, N. & Palomares, E. Photocatalytic water splitting: advantages and challenges. Sustain. Energy Fuels 5, 4560–4569 (2021).
Singh, N., Prakash, J. & Gupta, R. K. Design and engineering of high-performance photocatalytic systems based on metal oxide–graphene–noble metal nanocomposites. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2, 422–439 (2017).
Aksel, C. The microstructural features of an alumina–mullite–zirconia refractory material corroded by molten glass. Ceram. Int. 29, 305–309 (2003).
Clarke, D. R., Oechsner, M. & Padture, N. P. Thermal-barrier coatings for more efficient gas-turbine engines. MRS Bull. 37, 891–898 (2012).
Radhakrishnan, J. K., Kamble, S. S., Krishnapur, P. P., Padaki, V. C. & Gnanasekaran, T. Zirconia Oxygen Sensor for aerospace applications. in 2012 Sixth International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST) 714–717 (IEEE, 2012). doi:10.1109/ICSensT.2012.6461771.
Dhanasekaran, P., Williams, S. R., Kalpana, D. & Bhat, S. D. Boosting efficiency and stability using zirconia nanosphere-held carbon for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. RSC Adv. 8, 472–480 (2018).
Jeong, D.-W., Na, H.-S., Shim, J.-O., Jang, W.-J. & Roh, H.-S. A crucial role for the CeO₂ –ZrO₂ support for the low temperature water gas shift reaction over Cu–CeO₂ –ZrO₂ catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 5, 3706–3713 (2015).
Sayama, K. & Arakawa, H. Photocatalytic decomposition of water and photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide over zirconia catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 531–533 (1993).
Gionco, C. et al. Cerium-Doped Zirconium Dioxide, a Visible-Light-Sensitive Photoactive Material of Third Generation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 447–451 (2014).
Hernández, S. et al. Insights Into the Sunlight-Driven Water Oxidation by Ce and Er-Doped ZrO₂. Front. Chem. 6, 368 (2018).
Gionco, C. et al. Rare earth oxides in zirconium dioxide: How to turn a wide band gap metal oxide into a visible light active photocatalyst. J. Energy Chem. 26, 270–276 (2017).
Sudrajat, H., Babel, S., Sakai, H. & Takizawa, S. Rapid enhanced photocatalytic degradation of dyes using novel N-doped ZrO₂. J. Environ. Manage. 165, 224–234 (2016).
Bugrov, A. N., Rodionov, I. A., Zvereva, I. A., Smyslov, R. Yu. & Almjasheva, O. V. Photocatalytic activity and luminescent properties of Y, Eu, Tb, Sm and Er-doped ZrO₂ nanoparticles obtained by hydrothermal method. Int. J. Nanotechnol. 13, 147 (2016).
Poungchan, G., Ksapabutr, B. & Panapoy, M. One-step synthesis of flower-like carbon-doped ZrO2 for visible-light-responsive photocatalyst. Mater. Des. 89, 137–145 (2016).
Wang, Q. et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen generation on low-bandgap black zirconia (ZrO₂) produced by high-pressure torsion. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 3643–3650 (2020).
Imparato, C. et al. Unraveling the Charge State of Oxygen Vacancies in ZrO_{2– x} on the Basis of Synergistic Computational and Experimental Evidence. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 11581–11590 (2019).
Song, L., Cao, X. & Li, L. Engineering Stable Surface Oxygen Vacancies on ZrO₂ by Hydrogen-Etching Technology: An Efficient Support of Gold Catalysts for Water-Gas Shift Reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 31249–31259 (2018).
Teeparthi, S. R., Awin, E. W. & Kumar, R. Dominating role of crystal structure over defect chemistry in black and white zirconia on visible light photocatalytic activity. Sci. Rep. 8, 5541 (2018).
Sinhamahapatra, A., Jeon, J.-P., Kang, J., Han, B. & Yu, J.-S. Oxygen-Deficient Zirconia (ZrO2 – x): A New Material for Solar Light Absorption. Sci. Rep. 6, 27218 (2016).
Qi, F. et al. Interfacial Reaction-Induced Defect Engineering: Enhanced Visible and Near-Infrared Absorption of Wide Band Gap Metal Oxides with Abundant Oxygen Vacancies. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 55417–55425 (2020).
Solakidou, M., Georgiou, Y. & Deligiannakis, Y. Double-Nozzle Flame Spray Pyrolysis as a Potent Technology to Engineer Noble Metal-TiO2 Nanophotocatalysts for Efficient H2 Production. Energies 14, 817 (2021).
Wang, Y. et al. Novel N-doped ZrO₂ with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity for hydrogen production and degradation of organic dyes. RSC Adv. 8, 6752–6758 (2018).
Naldoni, A. et al. Photocatalysis with Reduced TiO₂: From Black TiO₂ to Cocatalyst-Free Hydrogen Production. ACS Catal. 9, 345–364 (2019).
Fujiwara, K., Deligiannakis, Y., Skoutelis, C. G. & Pratsinis, S. E. Visible-light active black TiO2-Ag/TiOx particles. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 154–155, 9–15 (2014).
Ruiz Puigdollers, A., Schlexer, P., Tosoni, S. & Pacchioni, G. Increasing Oxide Reducibility: The Role of Metal/Oxide Interfaces in the Formation of Oxygen Vacancies. ACS Catal. 7, 6493–6513 (2017).
Pacchioni, G. Numerical Simulations of Defective Structures: The Nature of Oxygen Vacancy in Non-reducible (MgO, SiO₂, ZrO₂) and Reducible (TiO₂, NiO, WO₃) Oxides. in Defects at Oxide Surfaces (eds. Jupille, J. & Thornton, G.) vol. 58 1–28 (Springer International Publishing, 2015).
Zu, D. et al. Black ZrO₂ synthesized by molten lithium reduction strategy for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 103, 4035–4042 (2020).
Sinhamahapatra, A., Jeon, J.-P. & Yu, J.-S. A new approach to prepare highly active and stable black titania for visible light-assisted hydrogen production. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 3539–3544 (2015).
Mädler, L., Kammler, H. K., Mueller, R. & Pratsinis, S. E. Controlled synthesis of nanostructured particles by flame spray pyrolysis. J. Aerosol Sci. 33, 369–389 (2002).
Stahl, J. et al. Comparing Co-catalytic Effects of ZrO_x, SmO_x, and Pt on CO_x Methanation over Co‐based Catalysts Prepared by Double Flame Spray Pyrolysis. ChemCatChem 13, 2815–2831 (2021).
Gionco, C. et al. Paramagnetic Defects in Polycrystalline Zirconia: An EPR and DFT Study. Chem. Mater. 25, 2243–2253 (2013).
Koirala, R., Pratsinis, S. E. & Baiker, A. Synthesis of catalytic materials in flames: opportunities and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 3053–3068 (2016).
Weaver, J. H., Peterman, D. J., Peterson, D. T. & Franciosi, A. Electronic structure of metal hydrides. IV. TiHx, ZrHx, HfHx, and the fcc-fct lattice distortion. Phys. Rev. B 23, 1692–1698 (1981).
Lackner, P., Zou, Z., Mayr, S., Diebold, U. & Schmid, M. Using photoelectron spectroscopy to observe oxygen spillover to zirconia. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 17613–17620 (2019).
Ma, W., Herbert, F. W., Senanayake, S. D. & Yildiz, B. Non-equilibrium oxidation states of zirconium during early stages of metal oxidation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 101603 (2015).
Ricca, C., Ringuedé, A., Cassir, M., Adamo, C. & Labat, F. A comprehensive DFT investigation of bulk and low-index surfaces of ZrO₂ polymorphs. J. Comput. Chem. 36, 9–21 (2015).
Quintard, P. E., Barbéris, P., Mirgorodsky, A. P. & Merle-Méjean, T. Comparative Lattice-Dynamical Study of the Raman Spectra of Monoclinic and Tetragonal Phases of Zirconia and Hafnia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85, 1745–1749 (2004).
AP Naumenko, NI Berezovska, MM Biliy, OV Shevchenko. Vibrational analysis and Raman spectra of tetragonal zirconia. Phys. Chem. Solid State 9, 121–125 (2008).
Kim, B.-K. & Hamaguchi, H. Mode Assignments of the Raman Spectrum of Monoclinic Zirconia by Isotopic Exchange Technique. Phys. Status Solidi B 203, 557–563 (1997).
Hirata, T., Asari, E. & Kitajima, M. Infrared and Raman Spectroscopic Studies of ZrO₂ Polymorphs Doped with Y₂O3 or CeO₂. J. Solid State Chem. 110, 201–207 (1994).
Nye, J. F. & Lindsay, R. B. Physical Properties of Crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices. Phys. Today 10, 26–26 (1957).
Perevalov, T. V. & Islamov, D. R. Atomic and electronic structure of oxygen polyvacancies in ZrO₂. Microelectron. Eng. 178, 275–278 (2017).
Tisdale, W. A. et al. Hot-Electron Transfer from Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Science 328, 1543–1547 (2010).
Portis, A. M. Electronic Structure of F Centers: Saturation of the Electron Spin Resonance. Phys. Rev. 91, 1071–1078 (1953).
Castner, T. G. Saturation of the Paramagnetic Resonance of a V Center. Phys. Rev. 115, 1506–1515 (1959).
Solakidou, M. et al. Efficient photocatalytic water-splitting performance by ternary CdS/Pt-N-TiO₂ and CdS/Pt-N,F-TiO₂: Interplay between CdS photo corrosion and TiO₂-dopping. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 254, 194–205 (2019).
Stathi, P., Solakidou, M. & Deligiannakis, Y. Lattice Defects Engineering in W-, Zr-doped BiVO₄ by Flame Spray Pyrolysis: Enhancing Photocatalytic O₂ Evolution. Nanomaterials 11, 501 (2021).

No competing interests reported.

SIDELIGIANNAKISSciReports2022.docx

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
22 Jul, 2022
Reviews received at journal
23 Jun, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
21 Jun, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
20 Jun, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
17 Jun, 2022
Editor invited by journal
14 Jun, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
14 Jun, 2022
First submitted to journal
08 Jun, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Control of Monomeric Vo’s vs. Vo clusters in ZrO_2-xforSolar-Light H₂ Production from H₂O at High-Yield [millimoles gr^-1 h^-1]

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Results

Discussion

Methods

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1