Effects o of N-deficiency on spring shoot growth and dry weight of tea plants
N-deficiency significantly delayed the sprouting of tea shoots. One bud with one leaf, one bud with the second leaf and one bud with the third leaf were delayed by 13, 11 and 13 days, respectively (Table 1). Also, N-deficiency significantly decreased the dry weight of root (Figure 1A), stem (Figure 1B) and leaf (Figure 1C). The higher percent of root DW/shoot DW under N-deficiency showed that root was more sensitive to N-deficiency (Figure 1D).
Table 1
Effect of N-deficiency on the shoot growth of tea plants.
Treatments
|
Date of one bud with the first leaf
|
Date of one bud with second leaf
|
Date of one bud with the third leaf
|
Control
|
8-Mar
|
12-Mar
|
14-Mar
|
N-deficiency
|
12-Mar
|
23-Mar
|
27-Mar
|
Intervals between with the treatments
|
13 days
|
11 days
|
13 days
|
Effects of N-deficiency on total nitrogen content and activities of related enzymes tea plants
NR, NiR, GOGAT and GS were involved in the uptake, ammonification and assimilation in amino acids in plant. Enzyme dynamic measurement found that N-deficiency significantly reduced leaf and root N content (Figure 2A;Figure 3A), the activities of GOGAT (Figure 2D; Figure 3D), NR (Figure 2B; Figure 3B) and NiR (Figure 2C; Figure 3C) in tea leaf and root, whereas remarkably elevated the activities of leaf GS and root GS (Figure 2E; Figure 3E).
Effects of N-deficiency on the contents of chlorophyll and total flavonoids in tea leaves
N-deficiency significantly increased total flavonoids content represented as the UV-absorbing compounds at 270 nm and 330 nm wavelength in tea leaves, but did not change that value at 300 nm wavelength (Figure 2F).
N-deficiency remarkedly decreased Chl a (Figure 4A), Chl b (Figure 4B) and total Chl (Chl a+b) contents (Figure 4C). There was no significant change observed in the ratio of Chl a to Chl b (Chl a/b) (Figure 4D).
RNA-Seq, de novo assembly, transcripts annotation and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identification
Transcript profiles of the RNA-Seq data were analyzed by calculating the reads per kilo base per million reads (RPKM). Twelve cDNA libraries, including three biological replicates for normal nitrogen (CK) leaf (CKL1, CKL2 and CKL3), N-deficiency leaf (NNL1, NNL2 and NNL3), normal nitrogen (CK) root (CKR1, CKR2 and CKR3), N-deficiency root (NNR1, NNR2 and NNR3) were constructed and sequenced. The numbers of raw reads generated from each library ranged from 38,701,550 to 53,027,440. The percentages of clean reads and Q20 (sequencing error rates lower than 1%) were more than 98 and 95%, respectively (Table 2). Here, 77.57%-86.40% of the clean reads were mapped uniquely to the tea genome, and only a small proportion of them were mapped multiply to the genome [1]. The number of known transcripts generated from reference genomes ranged from 26,930 to 29,188, which accounted for 64.37-69.77% of the number of annotated genes in the genome. The RNA-Seq data was deposited in NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) with SRA accession number PRJNA747801.
Table 2
Summary of the RNA-Seq data of the control and N-deficient tea leaves and roots.
Sample and treatment
|
Raw reads
|
Clean reads (%)
|
GC %
|
Q20
|
Q30
|
CKL1
|
44099018
|
43547360(98.75%)
|
44.05%
|
96.28%
|
90.97%
|
CKL2
|
43366334
|
42740292(98.56%)
|
44.16%
|
96.30%
|
91.09%
|
CKL3
|
46852726
|
46505542(99.26%)
|
43.92%
|
96.08%
|
90.59%
|
Average (CKL)
|
44772693
|
44264398(98.86%)
|
44.04%
|
96.22%
|
90.88%
|
NNL1
|
48563670
|
48284164(99.42%)
|
43.18%
|
95.78%
|
90.06%
|
NNL2
|
45788340
|
45540402(99.46%)
|
43.17%
|
95.99%
|
90.44%
|
NNL3
|
38701550
|
38451384(99.35%)
|
43.23%
|
96.19%
|
90.81%
|
Average (NNL)
|
44351187
|
44091983(99.42%)
|
43.19%
|
95.99%
|
90.44%
|
CKR1
|
44600070
|
44324964(99.38%)
|
43.72%
|
95.88%
|
90.28%
|
CKR2
|
42203314
|
41834642(99.13%)
|
43.72%
|
95.77%
|
90.02%
|
CKR3
|
53027440
|
52667716(99.32%)
|
42.97%
|
96.19%
|
91.01%
|
Average (CKR)
|
46610275
|
46275774(99.28%)
|
43.47%
|
95.95%
|
90.44%
|
NNR1
|
45849948
|
45485956(99.30%)
|
43.26%
|
96.13%
|
90.73%
|
NNR2
|
43861456
|
43555094(99.30%)
|
43.08%
|
95.87%
|
90.24%
|
NNR3
|
42040232
|
41564386(98.87%)
|
43.32%
|
95.86%
|
90.21%
|
Average (NNR)
|
43917212
|
43535145(99.13%)
|
43.22%
|
95.95%
|
90.39%
|
In this study, the DEGs between control and N-deficiency were identified with an absolute value of the log2 ratio (|log2(fold change)|) ≥ 1 and a threshold of FDR ≤ 0.05. We obtained 3050 up-regulated and 2688 down-regulated DEGs in tea leaf and 1025 up-regulated and 744 down-regulated DEGs in tea root (Figure 5A; Additional file 2 - Additional file 5). Among these DEGs, the largest number of which was the DEGs with the |log2(fold change)| between 1 to 2, followed by 2 to 5 and 5 to 10, respectively (Figure 5B).
Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis indicated that the biological functions were significantly associated with differentially expressed transcripts. The DEGs in the NNL vs. CKL group separated into three main categories, including 60 GO groups based on biological process, 32 groups based on cellular component, and 39 groups based on molecular function (Figure 6). However, The DEGs in the NNR vs. CKR group separated into three main categories, including 50 GO groups based on biological process, 29 groups based on cellular component, and 34 groups based on molecular function (Figure 7). GO term enrichment analysis showed that 205 DEGs in tea leaf were enriched in seven GO terms based on P < 0.05. In these GO terms, 17 DEGs were enriched in photosystem I (GO:0009522), 9 DEGs were enriched in photosynthesis light harvesting (GO:0009765), 17 DEGs were enriched in chlorophyll binding (GO:0016168), 38 DEGS were enriched in chloroplast thylakoid membrane (GO:0009535, cellular component), 89 DEGs were enriched in transmembrane transport (GO:0055085), 17 DEGs were enriched in protein-chromophore linkage (GO:0018298, cellular component), 18 DEGs were enriched in transmembrane transporter activity (GO:0022857, cellular component), respectively (Additional file 6).
GO enrichment analysis showed that 152 DEGs in tea roots were enriched in 11 GO items (P < 0.05). In these GO terms, 33 DEGs were enriched in extracellular region (GO: 0005576), 27 were enriched in monooxygenase activity (GO:0004497), 15 DEGs were enriched in nutrient reservoir activity (GO:0045735), 24 DEGs were enriched in oxidoreductase activity (GO:0016705), 38 DEGs were enriched in metabolic process (GO:0008152), 16 DEGs were enriched in manganese ion binding (GO:0030145), 31 DEGs were enriched in heme binding (GO:0020037), 30 DEGs were enriched in iron ion binding(GO:0005506), 12 DEGs were enriched in transferase activity (GO:0016758), 6 DEGs were enriched in oxidation-reduction process (GO:0055114), 31 DEGs were enriched in transferase activity (GO:0016740), respectively (Additional file 7). In order to identify the main biological processes and its related DEGs which were involved in tea transcriptomic response to N deficiency, hereafter we will focus our attention on the DEGs that were enriched GO terms with regard to biological processes.
Validation of RNA-Seq results by RT-qPCR
In order to verify the reliability of the RNA-seq results, 31 DEGs were randomly selected from RNA-seq data to perform RT-qPCR analysis. The RNA samples used for the RT-qPCR assay were processed in the same way as the RNA-seq samples. Except for TEA027636.1 and TEA017682.1, the expression patterns of the other 29 selected DEGs were highly consistent with the RNA-seq data, demonstrating that the RNA-seq data were robust and reliable method to isolate and identify N-deficiency responding DEGs in tea leaves (Figure 8).